The info of the video is really valuable. I have watched all your videos and lately they are lacking some energy! I closed my eyes during the explanation at some point, so keep it up :) Just a tiny piece of advice because I think that with your RhinoInside knowledge you are the guru of it by far.
Hi! Very well explained. Is there a way to remove direct shapes? Or rename them somehow? I work with timber houses and import my trusses as .IFC. After i import the IFC i bind the link so I can move trusses independently. The geometry from the link converts to "generic models: direct shape". However, if the trusses gets modified and i want to import them and bind the link again i get an error message saying that the names of the new direct shapes clashes with the old ones, and the old ones will be used. This causes my truss-geometry to look like the old, unmodified ones. Or look like a forest after a hurricane. This worked without any problems in revit 23 so I think this is a side-effect of a feature of revit 24.
The info of the video is really valuable. I have watched all your videos and lately they are lacking some energy! I closed my eyes during the explanation at some point, so keep it up :) Just a tiny piece of advice because I think that with your RhinoInside knowledge you are the guru of it by far.
Hi!
Very well explained.
Is there a way to remove direct shapes? Or rename them somehow?
I work with timber houses and import my trusses as .IFC.
After i import the IFC i bind the link so I can move trusses independently.
The geometry from the link converts to "generic models: direct shape".
However, if the trusses gets modified and i want to import them and bind the link again i get an error message saying that the names of the new direct shapes clashes with the old ones, and the old ones will be used.
This causes my truss-geometry to look like the old, unmodified ones. Or look like a forest after a hurricane.
This worked without any problems in revit 23 so I think this is a side-effect of a feature of revit 24.
great explanation. thanks for sharing!
it's funny how Rhino inside documentation for Revit is better than Autodesk documentation for Revit....
any chance uploading RVT? i’m curious of system family version of your column