Judge Mathis remind me how much me and my daddy used to watch his show and laugh 5 days a week. He passed away from Covid at 81 in October last year. Rest Easy Bishop we love you ‼️❤️❤️❤️❤️‼️
I agree. This was supposed to be a business transaction and both parties should have went over the terms. Had agreement and signed off on it. This way she would have known what it was and could have said no before agreeing to it. A case would have been clearly valid then of he truly misrepresented. Then again I also understand where he is coming from. She promotes herself very sexually so he thought she would have been fine with it. He was mislead in a way but she was too. But if he told her it was a swing party she should have gotten clarification, looked it up or something.
Judge missed this one. Defendant said that he informed "her team" that it was a "freak nature party". It was up to them to get a clarification of the nature of the event, if they didn't understand what kind of party it was. However, they did not. UA-cam her video, she appears to be a perfect fit for this type of party. It seems like her brand is about "freakdom", this could have helped her build her brand. Like the defendant said, "She's a freak of nature, I brought into a room full-a-freaks. I don't see what the problem was." Judge might be calling Yella Yella to smoke some weed and get "rated".
I peeped how Judge Mathis mentioned the man J Prince who is from TX and a boss down there and in the industry! Yella Yella may be connected to him and Judge Mathis favored her in this case. He knew better. The defendant should have won. Or, just dismiss the case.
@@dbabies82 she's right he was being himself even though I don't like his personal stuff I still respected him because he was himself the lady act like a school teacher in court but she's a singing stripper trying to play ignorant 😭❤️🖤💚
Yeah I think it’s ultimately that she would liked to have been notified of the nature of the party, but with slogans like that I’m not understanding why you’re selling sex but also repulsed by it
I looked her up as soon as I saw her stage name. Mind you the case was still playing as i was doing so. Hadnt listened to her music but the thumbnail of her video proved how easily the defendant would believe it would be ok to book her for such event.
Her ig page screams Adult Activities Of Any Kind. For her to come here acting like she was flabbergasted by his request is ludicrous. Her deep throat video with the yellow balloon alone was all i needed to see.
@@mrshappilymarried1 Right. I think the defendant should have brought pictures and clips of her videos because the judge was definetly blinded by the fact it was a swingers party. Ig both parties were deceived so if anything the case should have been dismissed especially when you cant claim ignorance in the court of law.
She can keep her brand the way she want but that doesn't mean for someone to take advantage of that an bring her in without telling exactly what the place is about... would you be ok with someone getting raped because of the way they dressed so you do not that a woman or man can say no at anytime...it was a about business
@@virtuoussoulhealer3644 true ❤️🖤💚 I'm all for sisters but in this case sista is singing in her bra and panties and have a nerve to get upset when others were more freakier than she was😭❤️🖤💚
@@elizimmer3838 No lol. Actually that sort of logic usually gets people charged with sexual harassment or assault charges lol. "Well on her instagram she's sexual and she raps about sex so I assumed she would like this". Gtfo lmao
I remember someone in the music industry said, “ whatever you portray yourself to be in this industry you will be tested on. “ This young lady certainly learned that. I feel judge Mathis should’ve ruled in favor of the defendant.
Nah , I can’t even respect that - because if you know I’m an artist , why wouldn’t you tell me , Half the entertainers dress half naked during their shows , but he wouldn’t try that shit with them . 🤦🏾♀️
The only thing I disagree with is really her team should’ve asked more questions. I almost feel like it should’ve been a wash on both sides but idk all the facts
Agreed, you can't have it both ways. A freak of nature includes sometimes being around other freaks. Her team should've found out more about the party.
I think he made the wrong judgement. Her page advertises sex though. She naked on her page so it was only right for the booking. He shouldn’t have loss the case. Redo
@@quitau9699 I agree.. He should’ve look at her page to see what she advertise before making his judgement and he should’ve held her management responsible. The defendant said twice that he had told her management that it was a swingers party.
A contract for a performance is just that. It was her manager's responsibility to research the defendant & his business. He paid her $1000 deposit of $3500 & she wins $5,000 in court? She did not fulfill her contractual obligation. She wasn't entitled to a dime more.
i agree w the defendant… yes as an artist, despite her image, she is allowed to decline events but there was no contract and no clarification on her end, all she cared about was getting paid
She can have the brand she has and still have boundaries and be told what she’s getting into. Just because someone says they’re a freak doesn’t mean you can do whatever you want with/to them. She 100% should’ve been told what was going to happen because she should’ve had the opportunity to CONSENT to it with full knowledge.
EXACTLY, I don’t know why people think artists who may be on the risqué side aren’t allowed to have boundaries, just like most corn stars won’t be down with some rando on the street asking to grope them. EVERYONE DESERVES RESPECT. You made my point completely
@@adrianacwc8693 yes exactly! people think just because you’re sex positive means you always have to be. that’s just not the case, and even sex workers have boundaries and things they don’t like/want to do! To expect even someone who labels themselves a “freak” to be fine with literally everything is so wrong.
I don't think that her boundaries were compromised. I feel like we're missing some information from management. She said 90% were naked so 10% weren't. He said that the crowd was allowed to express themselves freely, so those that wanted to be naked were and those that didn't weren't. Yes, she can have boundaries, but her management team is responsible for knowing these things and informing her not the venue. As he said he was only able to talk to them.
HER TEAM IS AT FAULT! They are in charge of making sure the venue is conducive for the artist. They are the first point of contact, which requires them to investigate every engagement.
If the entire audience will be naked you should definitely give that disclaimer before booking talent. However, the plaintiff set herself up for alllll kinds of foolishness branding herself the way she does.
So you sell sex talking about rating sex parts. You go to a party that’s of that nasty nature and that’s offensive? Stop selling it then! That’s ignorant!!!! Both of them are degrading if one is!
I agree, while I understand her wanting to be respected as a woman, she should be more responsible with her brand. She’s grown she knows what type of image she’s portraying
Not at all, who you choose to represent yourself yes. Most prevalent female artists are sexual in some way, why is her representation of herself any different?
She misrepresented her services 😂 her first words to judge Mathis was “drop your pants and let me rate ya.” She misled and misrepresented him, she could’ve left she chose to stay and didn’t complete the performance. How is he wrong? 😂
She misrepresented herself by selling sexually. I’m with him thinking she’d be OK with the crowd if she’s with “freak of nature “ and have songs called “Bend me over”, and “Drop your pants and let me rate you” 🙄
Like facts! Judge Mathis was wrong with this judgment! She talking about she performs for Mother's Day events and such. 🙄 Like bish, I'm not letting you sing no ish called "Bend Me Over" for my darn mama. 🙄
A persona of sexual fiend is not consent to be in an unexpected environment full of naked strangers. That can be intimidating and scary. Most people sell sex for a regular lifestyle. That doesn't make her a freak and it doesn't give others the right to treat her anyway because, "she was asking for it, she presents like a freak. She should have assumed." Because people shouldn't assume. You need to get consent no matter how perverted you think the other person is.
@@kookiecat2803 no one said anything about consent . All she did was perform . It’s not like they told her she had to be naked .?She literally tells ppl to drop their pants so she can rate them . Violation goes both ways . You can’t go around violating other ppl then get upset that you have to perform infront of “freaks”. We grown , hold ppl accountable .
@@ChocLC Consent is the main argument here when you're employed to do a job and you're not told the people will be naked, which can be sexual harassment. It's different in the porn industry to tell customers to pull down your pants. Imagine a stripper doing it for example, it's not a demand and it isn't a violation as they aren't forcing anything. They also aren't cornering someone naked I might add. You also imply there's zero issue in this case saying it should be dismissed. It's clear the defendant is wrong for hiring a sex worker to dance and not telling her all the guests will be naked. Again, this is a person's career. They're still a regular human being and most people, especially women, would be uncomfortable around a bunch of naked strangers. "We grown" lol you really don't sound like it. Bit naive to think it's ok to treat someone any type of way because their career is sexual; and yes, you do think that because you believe this case should have been dismissed.
Her motto is to " drop your pants down and let me rate ya." You know how bad that sounds? Body positivity isn't just for women; it's for men as well. I appreciate her being an independent black female singer, but her motto....yeeeessh.
where us the degrading in this so if someone promotes themselves as a stripper gets booked as one then gets offened becwuse they where asked to strip???? lol smh
Judge Mathis was off here. She promoted herself as a freak being down for whatever. Her slogan is drop your pants, let me rate you…. Yet is appalled when pants were dropped 🤣😂
Artistry has boundaries. She's selling a fantasy like any other provocative artist. She's not selling the actual services or watching people service each other.
@@shalundapilot222 But the boundary ends at the music or at the video. Now if her videos featured actual nood people, that's a whole different story - but I highly doubt her videos did. You have to meet people where they are - not abuse or exploit whatever boundary they've already set.
Judge didn’t ask the plaintiff once about allegedly having been informed by her management team; she also didn’t deny it. Looking at the way she presents herself I can understand why he would have thought she’d be a good fit. Her single cover is her deep throating a microphone.
@AshyrahASMR You missed the point entirely. This has nothing to do with judging her character; It’s about the promoter for a sexually charged party/event, booking a sexually charged musician. The question is whether or not the plaintiff was informed, and the defendant stated repeatedly that her management team was notified. Her “promiscuity” doesn’t even factor in, just the comfort level with her own sexuality, and her representation indicates that she is very comfortable. It’s sensible that he thought she’d gel. That’s not sex-shaming, it’s inductive reasoning. I hope you can actually process what was stated and draw better conclusions next time.
@AshyrahASMR That was a reach. I'm sure her brand is what got her booked for that gig, not necessarily her music. I'm from htown and her name has been in no music conversations, but that's beside the point. She should've done the contracted job and then left. How is she so professional, but can't do her job? And he's even crazier booking her for $3500, and now having to pay even more. I would appeal and not give her another dime. Lame asf.
The deal was NOT fulfilled.... He said several times he had to talk to her team, not her... Her team should have explained that to her!! Judge you are wrong on this!!
That’s like having a song called “bring them guns out” and be surprised when people bring em out at your show. BRANDING is intentional.. Strategic even.
That’s not a good analogy. There’s a lot of rappers who sing about guns and they always have em in there vids, but you don’t see fans toting guns at there shows
@@andallthatfunjazz2496 the tongue has the power of life and death and how you carry yourself is indicative of the energy you will attract. The analogy may have been too dense for you, beloved.
After I researched her via Google I can see why he was confused. I wouldn't have taken things a step further by having people there completely nude. More communication was needed amongst the defendant & her team.
Dude came in cleaner than a doctor before surgery. 😂 He made some great points, but he should've given full disclosure about his audience. They weren't just naked, they were performing sex acts IN FRONT OF THE SINGER. 😳
Her IG page definitely suggestive and will make it seems like she's into that type of partying. If your brand name is "Freak of Nature" and you're telling men to "drop em and let me rate cha" I can see why he would invite her or book her for one of those types of parties. Reminds me of Ronnie from the Player's Club.
MY THOUGHT EXACTLY DON'T KNOW WTF SHE THINKS SHE DEEP THROAT A MICROPHONE SHE A FREAK OF NATURE PULL Your PANTS Down LET ME RATE YA A SONG Called BEND ME OVER WHY WOULDN'T HE THINK THAT SHE BE DOWN WITH A SWINGERS PARTY SHE A RECORDING ARTIST l THE Industry BE LOoking FOR THAT I Hate To Say It BUT The Industry Gone WANT Her To SWING With Them BECAUSE THEY WORSE Than DUDe And SHE SINGING ABOUT ANd Promoting WHAT The Industry ALL ABOUT DUH
Her Ig page and her music has nothing to do with the promoter failing to disclose that the patrons were gonna be naked and having sex in cages. I do agree that she may want to switch up her brand or get a better management team if she doesn’t want to be solicited as a FREAK. Lol
I’m a spoken word artist In Baltimore and was hired to do a set at a MUSEUM in an upscale area on Light St. I go in to do my thing and all of a sudden some of the ppl come from somewhere in the back NAKED and some had on body paint. Now most of the ppl were dressed but there were quite a few who were totally naked. I did what I came for and got gone afterward. I was shocked but I didn’t skip a beat. Collected my coins and thought about how gross it was that they had naked behinds on public fabric couches and chairs. 🤢🤮 I was repulsed but I rolled with it and made a mental note to not touch or sit on anything. I also got home and laughed at how many of them should’ve just put on their clothes. 😂 Much braver than me I tell you that, and braver than they shoulda bn! 🤣 I also did a birthday party/barber shop grand opening and after my set while waiting for my balance due strippers pop up in the room and started doing the most. 🙄 I excused myself from the main room area where the “performance“ was going on, collected my coins, and left. Ppl are really strange birds out here. I don’t even do ratchet material so Idk if it was the calm and class before the ass or what thought process was going on! 🥴
Her manager should have been brought in as a witness. I think both parties have valid points and it would have been helpful to know what her manager communicated to her beforehand.
This was ridiculous. The artist promotes herself a certain way, was booked for a venue accordingly, then she’s totally shocked by what was going on in there? This guys verdicts have been off for a while.
Her IG is literally of her in skimpy outfits and her bragging about her deep throat game. . .you advertise a certain lifestyle then get mad when people hire you thinking you really about that lifestyle
The way I cackled at her introduction. What the heck?! Out of curiosity I looked for her music. Her song goes hand and hand with his swingers party. 🤣 I can see why he thought she was the perfect performer for his event.
She full of crap…her page she portrays herself as an absolute slore and yet wants to be respected as a wholesome performer. She was in the environment conducive with what she portrays
She got that $1000… I disagree with the judge on this one. She ALSO misrepresented herself. “Freak of Nature” has such a wide wide meaning and they both should have been clear with each other what they each would and wouldn’t be doing under the “freak” umbrella. She got paid for 2 songs and she broke the contract to perform.
Thats what happens when you make a bad contract. Simple . You cant argue that in court because Thats literally the purpose of a contract.. id like to be paid for my time too . He should be grateful she performed. She woulda won this case without performing.
Nah, I'm not with Mathis on this one. Luckily the show pays out on all these judgements so ol buddy didn't really lose any money but just logically this shit doesn't make sense. Mr. 2 Times just a regular promoter? Nobody knows him in that area? Her and her team had no prior knowledge of this guy? He even says that she didn't do any promo on her page. Could that be because she isn't obligated, wasn't paid to, and just lazily didn't care to....Sure..possibly. But does it make more sense that whoever runs her page knew this would be a swingers event and didn't want her regular fans attending because they may have been put off by it? Furthermore, she just showed up and went from the vehicle to dressing room backstage blindfolded and hurried and then escorted to the stage where she was blindsided by the sea of nude bodies? Her team stayed close by her side and was just as shocked to see the debauchery at hand. Or does it make more sense that her and/or her team saw the nude people well ahead of her going on stage and she was well aware what was going on before even taking the stage? Its possible that she was unaware before attending but her team certainly knew and maybe convinced her to go on stage for atleast a song so she can 'claim' she fulfilled the contractual agreement and get her money. There is no way as a small time local artist you get $3500 for showing up and doing two songs (if that). People come to a swingers party to swing, they don't give af initially what struggling artist is performing. She had the $1000 deposit already, personally I dont feel she deserves anything outside of that for what she contributed. However, for performing two songs out of the five expected then I think she should get a little under half of the remaining $2500, so say another $1000. Freak of Nature, Pull ya Pants down and let me Rate Ya; Bend Me Ova, swingers event...makes sense to me.
She already had it in her mind to perform 2 songs because that what was on the flyers and she kept saying that ... so her and her team knew what she was doing
@@samwhite8677 Most songs are like 3 mins, so your telling me this girl couldn't even do a 15 min set (3x5) for $3500. She finessed a bag and played victim to Mr Mathis.
This is comedy gold !!!!! This guy needs his own tv show hosting these swinger parties !
She dates Dennis Rodman 😂
Comedy gold! 🤔 NOT! He's trying to hard to be funny but He's not funny at all
Judge Mathis remind me how much me and my daddy used to watch his show and laugh 5 days a week. He passed away from Covid at 81 in October last year. Rest Easy Bishop we love you ‼️❤️❤️❤️❤️‼️
❤️
@@Weareloved3 ❤️❤️❤️
Bless your heart 💝
RIP Bishop! 🙏🏽🙏🏽
Thank you all what lovely people you are. Blessings to you all and I pray God favor you all 💞💞🙏🏾🙏🏾
She wasn't asked to swing, she was asked to perform songs.
Exactly, judge wrong on this one.
Yes
Freak of Nature should drop her ass ... She is a fraud LOL
Somebody preach the Gospel, she wasn't paid to participate she was compensated to entertain bottom line
She Also Wasn't Booked To Watch People Have Sex While PreforminG..... Give Me The "Full" Details, And Let Me Make My Own ChoiCe !
She thought she was a “freak of nature” until she met some real freaks😂…This is why you use contracts while engaging in business transactions.
🤣🤣best comment
I agree. This was supposed to be a business transaction and both parties should have went over the terms. Had agreement and signed off on it. This way she would have known what it was and could have said no before agreeing to it. A case would have been clearly valid then of he truly misrepresented.
Then again I also understand where he is coming from. She promotes herself very sexually so he thought she would have been fine with it. He was mislead in a way but she was too. But if he told her it was a swing party she should have gotten clarification, looked it up or something.
Yeeesssss😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂🤦🤦
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Prefect example of " if you not about that life don't rap about it."
The dumbest thing I’ve ever heard
😅💯💯
🤣🤣🤣
You hear me!!? 😂😂😂
Judge missed this one. Defendant said that he informed "her team" that it was a "freak nature party". It was up to them to get a clarification of the nature of the event, if they didn't understand what kind of party it was. However, they did not. UA-cam her video, she appears to be a perfect fit for this type of party. It seems like her brand is about "freakdom", this could have helped her build her brand. Like the defendant said, "She's a freak of nature, I brought into a room full-a-freaks. I don't see what the problem was." Judge might be calling Yella Yella to smoke some weed and get "rated".
🤣🤣
But he didn’t state that in the contract
Spot on. She found her niche. She misrepresented herself with that bait and switch
I peeped how Judge Mathis mentioned the man J Prince who is from TX and a boss down there and in the industry! Yella Yella may be connected to him and Judge Mathis favored her in this case. He knew better. The defendant should have won. Or, just dismiss the case.
The defendant is a cool ass dude by the way 😊😊😊!!
How you gon call yourself “the freak of nature, drop your pants and let me rate you” and then get mad you got booked for a freak party..?!🤦🏽♀️
@🕸 RealDealSpill 1037 🕸 if that’s not an oxymoron idk what is 😂
😆😂🤣 I know right
N in that order!
Yea but at least tell me so I can be prepared that's all I ask for. Ion wanna walk in and see a whole lot of old parts
I just looked at her page….she’s still at it!!! Lmaooo!!!
I like this dude. He's cool and unapologetically "himself!"
he's ignorant and disrespectful asf towards that lady.
He also throws sausage parties
@@dbabies82 lol I wouldn't say he was really disrespectful, she said take'em down and let her rate them. He was tryna help
True ❤️🖤💚 and judge Mathis robbed him, the lady was acting like she was a Sunday school teacher in church but she's a singing stripper😭❤️🖤💚
@@dbabies82 she's right he was being himself even though I don't like his personal stuff I still respected him because he was himself the lady act like a school teacher in court but she's a singing stripper trying to play ignorant 😭❤️🖤💚
"If you catch me smoking that's not me that's my wife!" 🤣🤣💪🏽💯
“Drop ya pants and let me rate ya” but you’re offended to be at a swingers party? GIRL BYE.
I was confused by what exactly offended her, with lyrics like that😳🤔
Hahahaha
Yeah I think it’s ultimately that she would liked to have been notified of the nature of the party, but with slogans like that I’m not understanding why you’re selling sex but also repulsed by it
😹😹😹😹 right!.
Hypocritical... then when someone drops their pants FOREAL she sue them🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
I looked her up as soon as I saw her stage name. Mind you the case was still playing as i was doing so. Hadnt listened to her music but the thumbnail of her video proved how easily the defendant would believe it would be ok to book her for such event.
Her ig page screams Adult Activities Of Any Kind. For her to come here acting like she was flabbergasted by his request is ludicrous. Her deep throat video with the yellow balloon alone was all i needed to see.
@@mrshappilymarried1 Right. I think the defendant should have brought pictures and clips of her videos because the judge was definetly blinded by the fact it was a swingers party. Ig both parties were deceived so if anything the case should have been dismissed especially when you cant claim ignorance in the court of law.
Maybe there in this together
Same thing i did ran to IG while playing episode
Yall know what she is
This guy is suave, self aware and very emotionally intelligent
Blessings to them
She needs to change her brand and likeness because it fits the party he booked for her. She could have “rated” everybody there.
The whole damn party. He had some black widow podcast shit going on
lmaooo not rate everybody there oh my clutching my pearls lol
Exactly
She can keep her brand the way she want but that doesn't mean for someone to take advantage of that an bring her in without telling exactly what the place is about... would you be ok with someone getting raped because of the way they dressed so you do not that a woman or man can say no at anytime...it was a about business
@@alisacharles6348 Her agent should have check what the event was
I would have dismissed this case. If he didn’t speak to her directly, I would have needed testimony from the management
I agree
Mane
True ❤️🖤💚
My thoughts exactly
@@virtuoussoulhealer3644 true ❤️🖤💚 I'm all for sisters but in this case sista is singing in her bra and panties and have a nerve to get upset when others were more freakier than she was😭❤️🖤💚
I would've never expected his voice to sound like it does!
I agree with the defendant. You present yourself in a certain manner, it’s open to interpretation.
@AshyrahASMR He lost one random case with one judge. With most, he gets a free win.
@@elizimmer3838 No lol. Actually that sort of logic usually gets people charged with sexual harassment or assault charges lol. "Well on her instagram she's sexual and she raps about sex so I assumed she would like this". Gtfo lmao
@@elizimmer3838 you sound slow🤦🏾♂️ most judges would’ve ruled in the plaintiffs favor
Lol facts
@@saintmichaelgrayson9641 that is not validate
I remember someone in the music industry said, “ whatever you portray yourself to be in this industry you will be tested on. “ This young lady certainly learned that. I feel judge Mathis should’ve ruled in favor of the defendant.
yep
Ms Fake
Facts
Faka faka.lol....
Nah , I can’t even respect that - because if you know I’m an artist , why wouldn’t you tell me , Half the entertainers dress half naked during their shows , but he wouldn’t try that shit with them . 🤦🏾♀️
I like how “you have a song called ‘bend me over’?” And then “do you need a paternity test” scrolls on the screen 🤣
😂😂😂😂
Yeah I noticed that too.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Same here 😅
The only thing I disagree with is really her team should’ve asked more questions. I almost feel like it should’ve been a wash on both sides but idk all the facts
I’m betting her team only saw their share of that $3500 and nothing else
Her ig page speaks volumes and she should have lost this case hands down.
True ❤️🖤💚 that meant she doesn't get extra
Agreed, you can't have it both ways. A freak of nature includes sometimes being around other freaks. Her team should've found out more about the party.
She shouldn't have won. She smoked before she got there, I think he was up front enough.
She should have her management make specific stipulations in her contract about expectations in the future.
I think he made the wrong judgement. Her page advertises sex though. She naked on her page so it was only right for the booking. He shouldn’t have loss the case. Redo
@@quitau9699 absolutely
@@quitau9699 I agree.. He should’ve look at her page to see what she advertise before making his judgement and he should’ve held her management responsible. The defendant said twice that he had told her management that it was a swingers party.
Sounds like a good idea
@@quitau9699 Is she NAKED or is she scantily clad?
He giving me Plies vibes! She thought she was a freak and got freaked out 😅🤣😂😂😂
She sold everything his party represented. He was not in the wrong, her manager was.🤷♂️
right her manager made agreements on her behalf eithout informing his client
agreed
Her manger represents her so if their wrong she's wrong
They either didn't ask enough questions or they didn't tell her everything that was told to them
Still not how it works. You throwing an event you be clear with what you are doing and expecting
A contract for a performance is just that. It was her manager's responsibility to research the defendant & his business. He paid her $1000 deposit of $3500 & she wins $5,000 in court? She did not fulfill her contractual obligation. She wasn't entitled to a dime more.
i agree w the defendant… yes as an artist, despite her image, she is allowed to decline events but there was no contract and no clarification on her end, all she cared about was getting paid
This brotha smooth and slick talking lol 😂 he got game
That’s that H Town talk
I mean based off her Instagram I’m confused as to why she’s here to sue 🥴
What’s the Instagram 😂😂😂
😂
15 minutes of fame probably and promotion
@@Afrocreolebombshelle I agree
@@foreverever9001 just search yella yella
She can have the brand she has and still have boundaries and be told what she’s getting into. Just because someone says they’re a freak doesn’t mean you can do whatever you want with/to them. She 100% should’ve been told what was going to happen because she should’ve had the opportunity to CONSENT to it with full knowledge.
It’s crazy to me how this comment only has one like
EXACTLY, I don’t know why people think artists who may be on the risqué side aren’t allowed to have boundaries, just like most corn stars won’t be down with some rando on the street asking to grope them. EVERYONE DESERVES RESPECT. You made my point completely
@@adrianacwc8693 yes exactly! people think just because you’re sex positive means you always have to be. that’s just not the case, and even sex workers have boundaries and things they don’t like/want to do! To expect even someone who labels themselves a “freak” to be fine with literally everything is so wrong.
I don't think that her boundaries were compromised. I feel like we're missing some information from management. She said 90% were naked so 10% weren't. He said that the crowd was allowed to express themselves freely, so those that wanted to be naked were and those that didn't weren't. Yes, she can have boundaries, but her management team is responsible for knowing these things and informing her not the venue. As he said he was only able to talk to them.
You can’t have it both way. You’re either a freak of nature or not.
HER TEAM IS AT FAULT! They are in charge of making sure the venue is conducive for the artist. They are the first point of contact, which requires them to investigate every engagement.
Swinging alone should have demanded more questions
Facts they should always vet the venue prior to the engagement and prior to the artist arrival the night of...
If the entire audience will be naked you should definitely give that disclaimer before booking talent. However, the plaintiff set herself up for alllll kinds of foolishness branding herself the way she does.
The way she choices the brand herself doesn't change the fact the defendant left out a pretty integral part of what would be going on at that event.
@@ishy6875 preachhhhh
You couldn't be more correct Tiffanie, you hit the nail on the head.
@@ishy6875 agreed. everyone here was wrong. we needed to see her management
No her IG her videos she no different then the swinging but she should sue her manager not get on tv so u can get Fame to her nasty 🤢
Both of them need to make a movie together!!!
So you sell sex talking about rating sex parts. You go to a party that’s of that nasty nature and that’s offensive? Stop selling it then! That’s ignorant!!!! Both of them are degrading if one is!
Thank you sir.
Amen
I agree, while I understand her wanting to be respected as a woman, she should be more responsible with her brand. She’s grown she knows what type of image she’s portraying
They both are fools! 😐
Logic
This is why you should be careful about how you choose to represent yourself.
Bingo!
Not at all, who you choose to represent yourself yes. Most prevalent female artists are sexual in some way, why is her representation of herself any different?
Exactly. Just because Cardi B/CityGirls/etc, does it, doesn't mean everybody has to do it.
True!
@Tasia You can add them too. Nobody's above it.
She misrepresented her services 😂 her first words to judge Mathis was “drop your pants and let me rate ya.” She misled and misrepresented him, she could’ve left she chose to stay and didn’t complete the performance. How is he wrong? 😂
“I’m just tryna… digest this” lmao.,. I felt the same way 😂😂
She misrepresented herself by selling sexually. I’m with him thinking she’d be OK with the crowd if she’s with “freak of nature “ and have songs called “Bend me over”, and “Drop your pants and let me rate you” 🙄
🤓😌Well..🤭🤣😭😭😭😭
Ya got a valid point there I guess she's a undercover freak 🤣..
@@HERBJ77 😂
Like facts! Judge Mathis was wrong with this judgment! She talking about she performs for Mother's Day events and such. 🙄 Like bish, I'm not letting you sing no ish called "Bend Me Over" for my darn mama. 🙄
Yup…. She definitely bares some responsibility.
Judge Mathis: "Ok we'll start with you."
Plaintiff: "Ok, Yeah. I'm an artist I go by Yella Yella"
😂😂
I’m surprised he didn’t dismiss the case. If you present yourself to the world as a freak of nature, then that’s how they’re gonna perceive it.
A persona of sexual fiend is not consent to be in an unexpected environment full of naked strangers. That can be intimidating and scary.
Most people sell sex for a regular lifestyle. That doesn't make her a freak and it doesn't give others the right to treat her anyway because, "she was asking for it, she presents like a freak. She should have assumed." Because people shouldn't assume. You need to get consent no matter how perverted you think the other person is.
I feel like she meant freak as in weirdo, a freak of nature is just someone who stands out like circus “freaks”
@@katerakatera4951 how when she says freak of nature drop your pants and let me rate ya
@@kookiecat2803 no one said anything about consent . All she did was perform . It’s not like they told her she had to be naked .?She literally tells ppl to drop their pants so she can rate them . Violation goes both ways . You can’t go around violating other ppl then get upset that you have to perform infront of “freaks”. We grown , hold ppl accountable .
@@ChocLC Consent is the main argument here when you're employed to do a job and you're not told the people will be naked, which can be sexual harassment. It's different in the porn industry to tell customers to pull down your pants. Imagine a stripper doing it for example, it's not a demand and it isn't a violation as they aren't forcing anything. They also aren't cornering someone naked I might add. You also imply there's zero issue in this case saying it should be dismissed. It's clear the defendant is wrong for hiring a sex worker to dance and not telling her all the guests will be naked. Again, this is a person's career. They're still a regular human being and most people, especially women, would be uncomfortable around a bunch of naked strangers. "We grown" lol you really don't sound like it. Bit naive to think it's ok to treat someone any type of way because their career is sexual; and yes, you do think that because you believe this case should have been dismissed.
Her motto is to " drop your pants down and let me rate ya." You know how bad that sounds? Body positivity isn't just for women; it's for men as well. I appreciate her being an independent black female singer, but her motto....yeeeessh.
Sounds awful…. Sounds like drop your pants let me violate you!
And the second one was "Bend me over" 🤷♀️🤦
She talked ish about rating something in them👖, got there and👀👖down and got scared and changed her tune!!🤷🏿♀️
🤣🤣🤣 SMH. Right
I mean you can comprehend her motto, so if you don’t want to, don’t lol
Judge should have told her open your eyes when your in my court room!
That was a sharp suit. Well made!
This is the MOST unique case of Judge Mathis I have seen thus far. Funny, awkward and degrading all at the same time.
He’s handling it so professional🤗🤣
And don't forget entertaining! 😉
where us the degrading in this so if someone promotes themselves as a stripper gets booked as one then gets offened becwuse they where asked to strip???? lol smh
😂😂😂😂
She degrades herself and a self proclaimed freak. That’s all on her, I don’t blame him
VH1 needs to give Mr2Timez a show! 😆
Facts
Mr_TakinWinnersonly
Listennnn lol because he gone bring the viewers & the swingers 🤭 I’ve been trying to find his @ because I know he has to be popular
Judge Mathis was off here. She promoted herself as a freak being down for whatever. Her slogan is drop your pants, let me rate you…. Yet is appalled when pants were dropped 🤣😂
Artistry has boundaries. She's selling a fantasy like any other provocative artist. She's not selling the actual services or watching people service each other.
@@The-Mediator exactly it’s entertainment
💀💀💀💀
@@shalundapilot222 But the boundary ends at the music or at the video. Now if her videos featured actual nood people, that's a whole different story - but I highly doubt her videos did. You have to meet people where they are - not abuse or exploit whatever boundary they've already set.
🤦♀️🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
“That sounds DEGRADING and OFFENSIVE” while he’s trying not to laugh 😂😂😂
Everybody's a freak until they actually meet one.
Judge didn’t ask the plaintiff once about allegedly having been informed by her management team; she also didn’t deny it. Looking at the way she presents herself I can understand why he would have thought she’d be a good fit. Her single cover is her deep throating a microphone.
Wow, that’s nasty. I wonder if her parents approve.
JM be wayyy off and he she gonna get 5k at that?
@AshyrahASMR You missed the point entirely. This has nothing to do with judging her character; It’s about the promoter for a sexually charged party/event, booking a sexually charged musician. The question is whether or not the plaintiff was informed, and the defendant stated repeatedly that her management team was notified. Her “promiscuity” doesn’t even factor in, just the comfort level with her own sexuality, and her representation indicates that she is very comfortable. It’s sensible that he thought she’d gel. That’s not sex-shaming, it’s inductive reasoning.
I hope you can actually process what was stated and draw better conclusions next time.
Just outright tacky!
@AshyrahASMR That was a reach. I'm sure her brand is what got her booked for that gig, not necessarily her music. I'm from htown and her name has been in no music conversations, but that's beside the point. She should've done the contracted job and then left. How is she so professional, but can't do her job? And he's even crazier booking her for $3500, and now having to pay even more. I would appeal and not give her another dime. Lame asf.
The deal was NOT fulfilled.... He said several times he had to talk to her team, not her... Her team should have explained that to her!! Judge you are wrong on this!!
She definitely did not fulfill her contract. It was a straight breach of contract.
the fact that if you listen there’s one part where she admitted it was as she suspected
the team should've been in the court room
Facts
Facts
He is so funny where can we find him...he needs to be on TV and I'm looking to dance so where is he at?!??
Mr_takinwinnersonly
IG
Mr 2x
The funniest episode so far!😂😂😂 I enjoyed the show. That gentleman is hilarious!!!
This man has a great voice.....
4:40 "How much"
Judge Mathis over there looking diabolical
(He wanna book Yella Yella lol)
The defendant should've won. He was making excellent points.
I agree, but the Judge leans toward women a lot of times...
Nope, she may make provocative music however she wasn't informed that a bunch of orgies were to take place in cages and stuff
All he needed to show was her ig page
@@Phantomnovelty so what she SALES sex
She went to perform for an audience and she didn’t finish the job agreed upon…manager should of been more involved; where is the team?
For $3500 she should’ve put some shades on and rocked the show.
Or take him to court and get $5000
@@Iwant-truth boom 🤯 all money ain’t good money
JM was wrong. He stated he spoke with her team. It was her teams responsibility to ask the right questions and make sure she was good.
She is trying to get in the wrong business if she has issues with performing at that kinda party.
EXACTLY
Truth
Exactly and the name too
Wrong!!
She coulda had that money on repeat, minimum once a month! Word of mouth spreading her music. SMH....dumb
He misunderstood nothing...
"Drop your pants and let me Rate ya"
Sounds pretty kinky to me
That’s like having a song called “bring them guns out” and be surprised when people bring em out at your show. BRANDING is intentional.. Strategic even.
That’s not a good analogy. There’s a lot of rappers who sing about guns and they always have em in there vids, but you don’t see fans toting guns at there shows
@@andallthatfunjazz2496 the tongue has the power of life and death and how you carry yourself is indicative of the energy you will attract. The analogy may have been too dense for you, beloved.
@@kertisgrande literally none of that matters, he still should’ve asked for her consent
After I researched her via Google I can see why he was confused. I wouldn't have taken things a step further by having people there completely nude. More communication was needed amongst the defendant & her team.
I am with the defendant on this one.
brotha was comedy gold with his slick talking lmao
Me too this time...like how the hell you a "freak of nature" but out here acting like she a deaconess .
@mr_takinwinnersonly
@@MzStarlett5 freakiness has limits that was too much and then she said they was in cages going activities nah run her the money she performed
This situation needs to be in a movie 🤣
Dude has an amazing smile 💜
Dude came in cleaner than a doctor before surgery. 😂
He made some great points, but he should've given full disclosure about his audience.
They weren't just naked, they were performing sex acts IN FRONT OF THE SINGER. 😳
You usually have to pay extra for that. Lol
@@TopherGrant 🤣🤣🤣
Love this guy...I'm 67 Blk female a Oakland native and I grew up seeing Pimps and Players..this guy is truly a business man.
😂😂😂
Isn’t that what a swinger party is though?
I can’t even finish the video JM had me spit out my drink writing down “ drop your pants and let me rate ya” 😂😂😂😂😂
Her IG page definitely suggestive and will make it seems like she's into that type of partying. If your brand name is "Freak of Nature" and you're telling men to "drop em and let me rate cha" I can see why he would invite her or book her for one of those types of parties. Reminds me of Ronnie from the Player's Club.
Ronnie would’ve been about her paper tho..😂 This yella heffa is a fraud!
Drop your pants and we will rate ya? Judge Mathis was like ok, like had no comment 🤣🤣🤣
Even Doyle was quiet 😂😂😂
This is the perfect time where "if you get stage fright, picture everyone naked🤣" would've applied
I can only imagine what was going through her head when she seen this
She has every right to be selective. That said, she seems kind of prudish to be advertising all that freakiness.
A fake persona like ALL the rest of the entertainment industry
@@kayshawnsimmons6822 It’s made MILLIONS for the likes of Cardi B, Nikki Minaj, and Megan The Stallion. Sex sells, I don’t blame her for selling it
Agreed
He owes her nothing..she started..Judge Judy would have not paid her
MY THOUGHT EXACTLY DON'T KNOW WTF SHE THINKS SHE DEEP THROAT A MICROPHONE SHE A FREAK OF NATURE PULL Your PANTS Down LET ME RATE YA A SONG Called BEND ME OVER WHY WOULDN'T HE THINK THAT SHE BE DOWN WITH A SWINGERS PARTY SHE A RECORDING ARTIST l THE Industry BE LOoking FOR THAT I Hate To Say It BUT The Industry Gone WANT Her To SWING With Them BECAUSE THEY WORSE Than DUDe And SHE SINGING ABOUT ANd Promoting WHAT The Industry ALL ABOUT DUH
It’s 2022 I feel like nowadays , judges need tech on hand . He could have looked her up and seen what she promoted . Simple
💯💯💯
Her Ig page and her music has nothing to do with the promoter failing to disclose that the patrons were gonna be naked and having sex in cages. I do agree that she may want to switch up her brand or get a better management team if she doesn’t want to be solicited as a FREAK. Lol
his voice is hilarious, felt like I was watching a on going commercial 😭😭😭😭🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I’m a spoken word artist In Baltimore and was hired to do a set at a MUSEUM in an upscale area on Light St. I go in to do my thing and all of a sudden some of the ppl come from somewhere in the back NAKED and some had on body paint. Now most of the ppl were dressed but there were quite a few who were totally naked. I did what I came for and got gone afterward. I was shocked but I didn’t skip a beat. Collected my coins and thought about how gross it was that they had naked behinds on public fabric couches and chairs. 🤢🤮 I was repulsed but I rolled with it and made a mental note to not touch or sit on anything. I also got home and laughed at how many of them should’ve just put on their clothes. 😂 Much braver than me I tell you that, and braver than they shoulda bn! 🤣 I also did a birthday party/barber shop grand opening and after my set while waiting for my balance due strippers pop up in the room and started doing the most. 🙄 I excused myself from the main room area where the “performance“ was going on, collected my coins, and left. Ppl are really strange birds out here. I don’t even do ratchet material so Idk if it was the calm and class before the ass or what thought process was going on! 🥴
You are 100% professional. And you are definitely right...there are some...unusual characters out there.
😂
I’m sorry but the “calm and class before the ass” has me in tears!! 😂😂😂😂
@@JasmineTiya I was trying hard to make it make sense. 🤣🤣🤣
@JasmineTiya I screamed lmaooooooooo
She said everybody at the party was funky!!!🤦🏾♀️💀😂🤣🤢
Lol
I remember seeing this on tv when it aired. I was lmao when the judge was like, “drop your pants and we’ll do what?” 🤣🤣🤣
Her manager should have been brought in as a witness. I think both parties have valid points and it would have been helpful to know what her manager communicated to her beforehand.
This was ridiculous. The artist promotes herself a certain way, was booked for a venue accordingly, then she’s totally shocked by what was going on in there? This guys verdicts have been off for a while.
I’ve never heard of ANYBODY having a swingers party in real life 🤣🤣🤣
Everybody wants to be a freak until it's time to get freaky.🤣🤣
Lmao.
Lmao
Lmfaoooooo
😅😅😭
I'm in the lifestyle and I've had so many women swear they're freaks but turn saintified after I told them about the lifestyle. 😆
Her IG is literally of her in skimpy outfits and her bragging about her deep throat game. . .you advertise a certain lifestyle then get mad when people hire you thinking you really about that lifestyle
Lmao.
Facts
I love this man.
He's handsome with a nice suit & nice voice. That's all, just giving a innocent compliment.
Lol
I think she knew what she signed up for. She’s good for reality tv thats about it.
I think if she would’ve been paid in full before she performed there wouldn’t have been a problem.
All she had to say is "I am like most artist, I don't do what I say" Its called faking it until you make it your honor.
No one is saying how smooth homeboy is. Sheesh.
I love him..my kind of guy..
More like a low budget pimp with a bad neck
@@terrencehicks7554 😭
It takes a village to raise this child and bring you this smile!!
Smooth because he is slick.# Free game#
The defendant sounds like he's preaching his story.
It take a village to raise a child and bring a smile 😭😭😭 imma use that
Please do
@mr_takinwinnersonly
Good Lord, his smile is Magickal !
Mr_takinwinnersonly
The way I cackled at her introduction. What the heck?!
Out of curiosity I looked for her music. Her song goes hand and hand with his swingers party. 🤣 I can see why he thought she was the perfect performer for his event.
He has a point. He has a lovely lovely smile. She needs to clean up her advertisement. No droping pants matter.
"I don't know if you have ever been to a swinging party."
"Nooooo!"
He definitely tried to catch JM up, lol.
I loved him
I'll bet he got his number on the low. I'll bet that party was off the chain.
@@lees3117 😂 😂 😂
She full of crap…her page she portrays herself as an absolute slore and yet wants to be respected as a wholesome performer. She was in the environment conducive with what she portrays
You can be a slore and respected lol
dude needs a TV show of his own.
She went on stag and preformed so she enganged in the contract she cant just say no now
He hired her to play a party. She refused to play that party.
End of story... unless the party was illegal and it wasn't.
Omg, how does this child even see what's directly in front of her with those batwings on her eyes?
This was BS she was the one misrepresenting
Agree
Judge is a simp
Hate to bring it up but judge Mathis does this with every black man going against the girl. I hate bringing up race but u can check every case
“You catch me smoking, that’s my wife you just think it’s me” 😂 Judge is hilarious
😅😅😭
I was looking for this comment because I thought I was the only one heard that 😅😂💪🏽💯
I Knew the Judge Hit The Blunt from Time to Time!
“If you catch me smokin weed, thas my wife” 😂😂
She got that $1000… I disagree with the judge on this one. She ALSO misrepresented herself. “Freak of Nature” has such a wide wide meaning and they both should have been clear with each other what they each would and wouldn’t be doing under the “freak” umbrella. She got paid for 2 songs and she broke the contract to perform.
Thats what happens when you make a bad contract. Simple . You cant argue that in court because Thats literally the purpose of a contract.. id like to be paid for my time too . He should be grateful she performed. She woulda won this case without performing.
Nah, I'm not with Mathis on this one. Luckily the show pays out on all these judgements so ol buddy didn't really lose any money but just logically this shit doesn't make sense. Mr. 2 Times just a regular promoter? Nobody knows him in that area? Her and her team had no prior knowledge of this guy? He even says that she didn't do any promo on her page. Could that be because she isn't obligated, wasn't paid to, and just lazily didn't care to....Sure..possibly. But does it make more sense that whoever runs her page knew this would be a swingers event and didn't want her regular fans attending because they may have been put off by it? Furthermore, she just showed up and went from the vehicle to dressing room backstage blindfolded and hurried and then escorted to the stage where she was blindsided by the sea of nude bodies? Her team stayed close by her side and was just as shocked to see the debauchery at hand. Or does it make more sense that her and/or her team saw the nude people well ahead of her going on stage and she was well aware what was going on before even taking the stage? Its possible that she was unaware before attending but her team certainly knew and maybe convinced her to go on stage for atleast a song so she can 'claim' she fulfilled the contractual agreement and get her money.
There is no way as a small time local artist you get $3500 for showing up and doing two songs (if that). People come to a swingers party to swing, they don't give af initially what struggling artist is performing. She had the $1000 deposit already, personally I dont feel she deserves anything outside of that for what she contributed. However, for performing two songs out of the five expected then I think she should get a little under half of the remaining $2500, so say another $1000. Freak of Nature, Pull ya Pants down and let me Rate Ya; Bend Me Ova, swingers event...makes sense to me.
Exactly! All facts!
👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
She already had it in her mind to perform 2 songs because that what was on the flyers and she kept saying that ... so her and her team knew what she was doing
@@samwhite8677 Most songs are like 3 mins, so your telling me this girl couldn't even do a 15 min set (3x5) for $3500. She finessed a bag and played victim to Mr Mathis.
His smile ❤❤
"Drop ya pants let me rate ya" but please sir, I'm a respectable individual so please do not drop your pants. WTH is this girl talking about lol
😂😂😂😂