A Tanker's-eye View Of The Land Raider | Warhammer 40k

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 92

  • @atankersview
    @atankersview  Рік тому +14

    Hope everyone enjoys this one! Lets make the community strong! Check out JoJo's work you legends!
    JoJo's Links!
    www.myminifactory.com/de/users/J0J0?show=tribe
    instagram.com/filamentio/
    facebook.com/Filamentio/about

    • @filamentio
      @filamentio Рік тому +2

      Big Thank you for your love ❤🎉

  • @BR4IN1N4J4R
    @BR4IN1N4J4R Рік тому +16

    I'd actually love to see your take on the Mastodon troop transport. It's big, it's chonky, and it's dumb as a brick. It's adorable and deserves more love than it gets

    • @atankersview
      @atankersview  Рік тому

      It is on my list. You'll see it in probably a month or so battle brother

  • @krieger7510
    @krieger7510 Рік тому +62

    The thumbnail is a bit odd, I don’t remember the land raider would have a demolisher cannon and a siege shield just like the vindicator variant for the rhino.

    • @alexh3974
      @alexh3974 Рік тому +23

      Rarer FW varrient, a Dark angel specialist model of the Land raider.
      Built for siege and intense urban combat.
      Theirs a whole list of less comman kinds, including, command, mortor, MLRS, and other modifications that have spring up over 10k years.
      Its the primary heavy armour planform for Marines, and also has a much larger sibbling called the Spartan, and Marstadon, that same genetics only much larger.

    • @Stop_Gooning
      @Stop_Gooning Рік тому +5

      There's a bunch of variants made by Forge World over the years.
      I like the flamethrower one.

    • @hammer1349
      @hammer1349 Рік тому +1

      ​@@alexh3974 I don't think it's dark angels specific. I think chapters like the Red Scorpions have used the land raider achilles

    • @bradsimpson8724
      @bradsimpson8724 Рік тому +6

      @@hammer1349 That's not an Achilles. The tank depicted in the thumbnail is the Land Raider Ares, a variant used specifically by the Dark Angels while hunting the Tribunal on Murun. The design was submitted to the Mechanicus, but has not yet been sanctioned, making it specific to the Dark Angels and their successor chapters.
      It does kinda resemble an Achilles at first glance, though.

    • @hammer1349
      @hammer1349 Рік тому

      @Brad Simpson ah yeah now I remember. The achilles swaps the dozer shield and demolisher cannon for a thunderfire cannon and extra front armour while keeping the same multi melta sponsons

  • @falsehero2001
    @falsehero2001 Рік тому +4

    It probably because the Land Raider was one of the first…vehicles…GW came up with for 40K that it’s so competent. Back when Games Workshop was relatively small and the mad lads running the place at the time were geeked out on historical war machines. If I remember correctly, many of those guys would leave GW to go on and create Warlord Games and their bevy of historical war games. (Can I get a fact check on that from somebody?)

  • @filamentio
    @filamentio Рік тому +7

    Thank you for your support and mentioning my work, I'm sure there are just the right people in your community to help me create new tanks :D

  • @Erikreaver
    @Erikreaver Рік тому +5

    Tanker's View Vtubering ain't something I would have expected, hah! Always nice to see you post a vid. Again putting forth my request for the ork Battlewagon, even though you wouldn't find much standardisation lorewise, we know GW put out one kit and that's gonna be the base. Imperial Armour 8 has some deec quasi-technical sheets, and I think you could see parallels to IRL vehicles easy enough. Also, still hoping for that flame tank video!

  • @urbypilot2136
    @urbypilot2136 Рік тому +12

    One variant of the Land Raider foregoes the troop transport capability to mount 3 set of twin-linked lascannons, and an extra pair of individual lascannons per side where the side doors would normally be. For a total of eight anti-armor barrels, the Terminus Ultra might just be up there in your definition of what a tank is.

    • @yeetleskeet854
      @yeetleskeet854 Рік тому

      Are lascannnons any good in an anti infantry role? I say this because the terminus ultra seems more of a tank hunter

    • @urbypilot2136
      @urbypilot2136 Рік тому

      @@yeetleskeet854 That is indeed the Terminus Ultra's designated role. It's the "tank destroyer" of the Land Raiders. Lascannons are usually useful against TEQs, which tend to have small model counts per units anyway. So a Terminus Ultra with all its lascannons could situationaly be used against heavy infantry.

    • @XD-sc4ix
      @XD-sc4ix Рік тому

      ​@@yeetleskeet854and even then there's like five variants of the land raider geared towards anti-infantry

  • @inductivegrunt94
    @inductivegrunt94 Рік тому +23

    The Land Raider is a really great transport and battle tank. But the track design being a backwards version of the same origin of the Leman Russ Tank is my biggest gripe with it. It's strong, heavily armored, modular, and so much more. Except for the fact it wouldn't be able to handle rough terrain with that track design. Great tank, huge glaring problem.

  • @tflwulf69
    @tflwulf69 Рік тому +1

    MY fave 40k tank...after watching a few of your previous vids and few other YT vids I thought you were just jumping on the 40k fan train...but then you said land's raider so you did really look into it. Kudos to you.

  • @michaeloyaski7602
    @michaeloyaski7602 Рік тому

    Finally found your second channel Tony. Loved watching your videos on the Greatest treaded warriors of Mankind the Bolos. Since you have a second channel now, I was able to build a scratch built MK. 2 Bolo. My future build project is to built a plastic model of my own Bolo from a story I've been working on and off with. Hope to read read novel when its finished.

  • @thorshammer7883
    @thorshammer7883 Рік тому

    I found this pretty interesting Sci Fi worldbuilding RP verse called "Ancerious Galactic" by a artist called EmperorMyric. I looked at some his ships and boy do they look very armed and pretty dang huge.
    There is even alot of art for tanks and other vehicles in verse.
    They look like their navy and ground forces can fight the Warhammer 40k factions head to head in direct battlefields.

  • @stephenjdutton
    @stephenjdutton Рік тому +2

    I've never understood why GW opted to place the main guns behind the side hatches, which is why I've always assembled mine to put them in the forward position and the hatches behind. Part of this could just be habit though. I've been in the hobby long enough to remember the previous land raider kit that mounted the las cannons forwards.

    • @alexh3974
      @alexh3974 Рік тому

      Plus mount thr guns forward, you can use the weapons as cover. Gove you a wider front width to shelter behind.

  • @akumaking1
    @akumaking1 Рік тому +13

    Hi. How you been?
    Have you considered exploring the Warhammer Fantasy vehicles like the Imperial Steam Tank or the Chaos Dwarf Iron Daemon? (The in-game models from Total Warhammer would be useful for a view).

    • @atankersview
      @atankersview  Рік тому +7

      Its on the list battle brother

    • @SnowLeopard784
      @SnowLeopard784 Рік тому +1

      I second this notion... maybe even that one Dwarf tank from Blood Bowl too.

    • @MrConna6
      @MrConna6 Рік тому +1

      @@SnowLeopard784 thats not a tank thats a lawn roller 😂

    • @filamentio
      @filamentio Рік тому

      i support this idea :D

  • @MrConna6
    @MrConna6 Рік тому +1

    I forget about the suicide doors, I always build them the other way round because they have the same attachment ports

  • @Ulani101
    @Ulani101 Рік тому +2

    Let's not forget potential spalling through the assault ramp door gaps.

  • @uria3679
    @uria3679 Рік тому +6

    Will the Titan tank from the EDF games be on your list

  • @sunshadow7XK
    @sunshadow7XK Рік тому

    Good on you for getting a partnership! Bit less of an arse-tearing than expected tbh

  • @SiegeTF
    @SiegeTF Рік тому +1

    IFV passengers chanting in...
    Current year: 'Napalm sticks to flesh.'
    Far Future: 'Promethium sticks to ceramite.'

  • @dwanejohnson7359
    @dwanejohnson7359 Рік тому +4

    You should cover the Bolo tanks of the Dinochrome Brigade

    • @jlokison
      @jlokison Рік тому +3

      He did, 3 weeks ago.

    • @dwanejohnson7359
      @dwanejohnson7359 Рік тому

      @@jlokison awesome, thanks for the heads up. I will look that up and watch it tonight

  • @trevorfarrar2502
    @trevorfarrar2502 Рік тому

    i know i said this before, but i love the mil word you use, so simple but funny

  • @lordtomlluckrahthegreat9014
    @lordtomlluckrahthegreat9014 Рік тому +1

    The way I see it, the Land's Raider can't be classified by any modern standards.
    It's not quite an MBT, an SPG or an APC but, at the same time, it has qualities that are reminiscent of all previously mentioned vehicle types.
    If I was held at gun point and asked to classify it, I'd have to go with "heavy IFV" or "assault transport tank". But, really, the best answer is to simply put it in it's own category: "Land Raider"

    • @XD-sc4ix
      @XD-sc4ix Рік тому

      What does SPG stand for?

    • @lordtomlluckrahthegreat9014
      @lordtomlluckrahthegreat9014 Рік тому

      @@XD-sc4ix "Self Propelled Gun".
      "SPG" is sort of a broad term for vehicles that carry great firepower in the form of, often, a single great weapon or weapons system. To do this, such vehicles typically lack a turret, machineguns and (not always) any kind of armor all together, to the point they can actually be considered to be guns on wheels/tracks. Because of this, SPGs will usually act as artillery, though more broadly, as non-frontline units.
      Real world examples of SPGs usually carry howitzers, mortars and multi-tube rocket launchers as their primary and only armament. It's worth noting that vehicles armed with anti-tank missiles and high velocity cannons (specially missiles, in the modern era) are more specifically considered to be "Tank Destroyers", and these vehicles will usually also have armor and machineguns, as they see much more frontline use, and some tank destroyers will even have turrets, making some of them very similar to tanks in appearance. "Self Propelled Anti Aircraft Guns" (or "SPAAG", for short) are usually armed with SAM (surface to air) missiles or an array of heavy calibre autocannons, chainguns or machineguns loaded primarily with air-bursting, incendiary or simply explosive ammunition (before there were missiles, long range AA work was done by huge guns firing heavy flack rounds at large groups of aircraft; at the same time, missiles will be made obsolete by potent lasers at some point in the future) and these kinds of vehicles almost always have turrets, but no armor or machineguns (they instead use camouflage, radars and ECM systems for protection; additionally, SPAAGs armed with many autocannons make the use of machineguns redundant, while missile SPAAGs often operate so far away from the frontline that they seldom need machineguns).
      As for examples in WH40k: the Basilisk, Medusa, Griffon, Thunderer, Whirlwind and Vindicator are all simple SPGs. Things like the Hydra and Hunter are SPAAGs. The Laser Destroyer, Leman Russ Vindicator and Shadowsword are tank destroyers.
      And this is a classification of classic space marine vehicles by modern standards, plus a Land Raider variant which I think would fit in that category, even if all Land Raider are overweight and overkill in any:
      ATV/Recon: Land Speeder, Attack Bike, Assault Bike.
      APC: Rhino, Land Raider Crusader.
      IFV: Razorback, standard Land Raider.
      MBT: Predator Destructor.
      SPG: Whirlwind, Vindicator (and the Thunderfire Cannon, sort of, thought it more of a fancy "field artillery piece"), Land Raider Helios and Land Raider Ares.
      Tank Destroyer: Predator Annihilatior, Laser Destroyer Vindicator, Land Raider Terminus Ultra.
      SPAAG: Hunter.
      As an unrelated note, there are many Flamer/Melts/Toxic Tanks in WH40k that also cannot be classified with standard methods. Historically speaking, tanks armed with flamers were variants of regular tanks, so they were still considered to be tanks since they had turrets with cannons and machineguns (flamethrowers were usually hull-mounted), and they would perform regular tank missions. More recently, the TOS-1 has been conceived to be a dedicated flamethrower vehicle though, more generally, it is an SPG. I guess Hellhounds are SPGs, even though they look like tanks, since they lack cannons.

  • @thorshammer7883
    @thorshammer7883 Рік тому +11

    Pretty good design which is surprising for GW. They should have kept the blueprints in records on Terra and multiple production worlds not just centralize all the records on one world away from the capital and also not kept contingency copies of the records. That's pretty foolish and shortsighted in hindsight.
    For the next tank review what do you think of Terrain Seige Tanks from Starcraft and Metal Gears from the Metal Gear series?

    • @danielm.595
      @danielm.595 Рік тому +1

      "pretty foolish and shortsighted"
      The Imperium in a nutshell

  • @theanathema3062
    @theanathema3062 Рік тому

    Yessss, next, we must do the predator tank, or the sister’s organ missile launcher tank

  • @BrotherCaptain36
    @BrotherCaptain36 Рік тому

    Even Bolo's became tractors after retirement. Remember that time one gassed all the skaven?

  • @R17inator
    @R17inator Рік тому +1

    I would be interested to see your take on some StarCraft vehicles, like the Siege Tank, Diamondback and Cyclone.

  • @Nostroman_Praetor
    @Nostroman_Praetor Рік тому +2

    As someone who is currently struggling to make their Rhino work on the tabletop, do you think you could make a Rhino/Predator video?

  • @TheManofthecross
    @TheManofthecross Рік тому +1

    you should do the battalion wars battle station and other veachiles in there.

  • @roguecarrick816
    @roguecarrick816 Рік тому

    The land raiders the gun carrier of the astartes. What gun? Doesn't matter, pick one. Actually most of the first born armor is like that. You look at it & you can tell what the original metal box was it's just got various aftermarket parts like a striker brigade.. my favorite land raiders probably the one where they mounted a mortar & multimeltas on it then went looking for the most ridiculous armor they could find to clad it in. The result is the Achilles, a land raider that eats enemy armor at close quarters or drops to who it may concern over walls at a distance & still finds room for 6 astartes in that hull. Have we got the rhino circus yet?

  • @SnowLeopard784
    @SnowLeopard784 Рік тому +2

    Remember. Twin linked guns are a bad thing.
    Unless the guns are so small you're practically garuanteed to hit any target larger than a human at 300 paces.

    • @Erikreaver
      @Erikreaver Рік тому +2

      'Cept it kind of makes sense in universe when you consider the technoretards don't actually know how things work half the time, so they might not have the ability to at least mass produce larger variants, so slapping two of the things you can make and feed makes a bit more sense!

    • @tarektechmarine8209
      @tarektechmarine8209 Рік тому

      I want to argue that they may have slight range of motion just enough to get the guns in about the same area, or just set convergence at a certain distance. But that would be coping. On the other hand they would both have use for more bullets and already have a machine spirit doing separate guns each of which will have it's own array of smaller targeting and such. Same problem with wing mounted weapons on astartes aircraft, I just gave them something to rotate on under the wing, at least that would be the smart idea for them considering counter measures from missiles in 40k seem to be advanced not discounting the armour most of the aircraft have.

  • @voin5371
    @voin5371 Рік тому +3

    If I may make a recommendation for your next vehicle, I think you may be interested in the Astraeus, a more unique variant compared to the likes of the Baneblade and seeing your possible opinions on Titans could be fun.

  • @DB8ed
    @DB8ed Рік тому

    I loved that Canyonero reference!

  • @davidmiddleton7958
    @davidmiddleton7958 Рік тому

    The Land Raider is an awesome all rounder. Tank, troop transport, mobile communications hub. The Land Raider variants also have nothing to apologise for. Regretfully, Tau rail rifles can make a mess of them!

  • @dominicvucic8654
    @dominicvucic8654 Рік тому

    It's also got an artillery variant

  • @wojciechagodzinski4886
    @wojciechagodzinski4886 Рік тому +3

    My proposal for next video.
    We all agree that Battlefild 2042 not good game (speaking very gently)
    M1A5 is very cool tank design, especially since it turned out to be very similar to AbramsX technology demonstrator.

  • @Jazzious88
    @Jazzious88 Рік тому +1

    Want to have a conniption, Look up the Malcador. Oy Ve

  • @alexanderwhite298
    @alexanderwhite298 Рік тому +1

    You should do a episode on the baby magnum from heavy object anime.

    • @atankersview
      @atankersview  Рік тому

      That would result in so many ball jokes. Im in.

  • @nookzerdaoudidi5869
    @nookzerdaoudidi5869 Рік тому +2

    do the AT-TE next.

  • @Spacefrisian
    @Spacefrisian Рік тому

    What about doing a tankers a view on the Type 61 tank from Gundam?

  • @Valandar2
    @Valandar2 Рік тому

    What about the Eldar Falcon grav tank?

  • @გიორგიმოსაშვილი-ო3დ

    Time to have a US marine playing the sax on top of a Bradley

  • @terrynewsome6698
    @terrynewsome6698 Рік тому

    Can you do the battletech rommel?

  • @almirria6753
    @almirria6753 Рік тому +1

    Bump to the top

  • @demoncore5342
    @demoncore5342 Рік тому

    What would you say to the Starcraft siege tank?

  • @darienevans6229
    @darienevans6229 Рік тому

    I can imagine this being used as a tractor and a tank if the wildlife is very hostile.

  • @asdfjoe123
    @asdfjoe123 Рік тому +1

    GW does IFVs right? Unloading your infantry squad out the side doors, or worse yet, out the front, and into the kill funnel? Yeah, that's NOT right.

  • @StevenSattler-k6u
    @StevenSattler-k6u Рік тому

    Accelerator cannons?

  • @kevinkocher9347
    @kevinkocher9347 6 місяців тому

    armor hunter?

  • @boxfoxscoot1614
    @boxfoxscoot1614 Рік тому

    next up tankers view reviews the ork tanks

  • @maddlarkin
    @maddlarkin Рік тому +1

    Unless they've changed the lore, the reason for the lack lf Landraiders is actually dumber than your usual 40k tech stagnation, at the height of the Heresy things, well, things weren't going well, supply couldn't meet demand so Big E decreed all Land Raiders should be reserved for Adeptus Astartes, which makes a kind of sense they were the primary fighting force with the Imperial Army seen very much as a support and garrasioning formation, thing is when Big E got shanked and ended up a glowing corpse on The Golden Throne, there just wasn't anyone senior enough to countermand his order and he didn't remember to mention it in his final instructions to Dorn while he wired him up to the Throne, so in theory there are massive, country sized production lines for Land Raiders just not being used as although the STC is fully avaliable Big E said marines only (and foe some reason Girleman didn't think to erase that particular rule from the docket after his return, although in fairness poor lads had a lot on his mind)
    He probably should though, just imagine a turreted version mass produced to replace or supplement the russ, broadly similar weapons capabilities, better sensor suite with Machine Spirit assisted targeting and a better level of all round armour protection and turn of speed. Even if the ones palmed off on the Guard weren't to the same spec's or production quality it would still be a pretty big step up from the Russ

  • @themalcontent100
    @themalcontent100 Рік тому +1

    God help you if you chose an ork vehicle to examine.

  • @carsandsports123
    @carsandsports123 Рік тому

    Baal predator is similar but hatches behind the guns, ramp in the rear, and i belive is a tank. Wish you actually said why land raidera cant be tanks as im not familar with the definition

    • @atankersview
      @atankersview  Рік тому

      Its an infantry fighting vehicle, because it carries troops and provides them with fire support to hold ground. A tank is meant to break through defenses and take ground, it cannot hold it.

  • @jamesm783
    @jamesm783 Рік тому

    Here's a ... Tank? from the MS Gundam universe that's pretty interesting. I'd like to see your thoughts on the various incarnations of the Guntank
    ua-cam.com/video/hsbd-tlMZkk/v-deo.html

  • @katathoombs
    @katathoombs Рік тому +2

    Language!
    (I like it. That's all.)

  • @milanondrak5564
    @milanondrak5564 Рік тому

    I think this tank would be an easy target on a modern battlefield and wouldn't be very impressive against real modern tanks.

  • @bearbrigadier9570
    @bearbrigadier9570 Рік тому

    comment

  • @RiffSilverthe1andonly
    @RiffSilverthe1andonly Рік тому +1

    The Vtuber looks so durpy lmao

  • @jtjames79
    @jtjames79 Рік тому +2

    Sacred Cow Shipyards sucks. That guy is way way way too full of himself.
    Please don't be like him and try to be some sort of debunking science communicator.
    Stick to your strengths and just tell us what a tanker thinks.
    Always remember to be humble even if your persona isn't, particularly if your persona isn't, and everything will go well.

  • @ryanreyes4622
    @ryanreyes4622 Рік тому

    The Big E should have known these angsty stages were coming he had like 29000 years of seeing angsty teens fuck up the universe yet he though his sons would be above it.

  • @solvdrage1456
    @solvdrage1456 Рік тому

    Military content Vtuber. ZOmg. Really good video.