love how they interpreted the "centaurs are better with bow and arrow" as "they have more skill in archery" rather than the obvious "they have both hands free"
They also don't have a torso-sized object right infront of their face. You could (relatively) accurately ride a horse and fire a bow if you clamp your legs onto the sides of a horse
Ok so do the humans HAVE to be on horses, or can there be bros in the back standing up firing arrows? The question says "humans on horses" but if it's a war you'd think humanity would do everything they could to win. Also what kind of humans? Cus some of the best horse archers in history come from the Central Asian Steppe, so if it's those guys vs Centaurs I think it's pretty even
@skeleton Have you ever read about Mongolian horse archers? Those bastards were insane. I highly doubt a centaur could beat them simply because they don't have to manage a horse. Also, archers most certainly had plenty of experience firing on the move. Humanity may have not been as advanced, but that doesn't mean they were idiots. If archers only ever fought from a standing position, they would be killed very quickly. If I remember correctly, archers could actually do "inhuman" things with their skill. Shooting multiple arrows into separate targets with all arrows fired at once. Extremely long-distance shots. Even curving the trajectory of the arrow to shoot behind walls, which is a far more specific use than it sounds. It's not even close to a right angle unless you specially make the arrows themselves, and I don't think this part has been recorded as used in a real battle.
@@TheCrateOfLemons Learning to hit a target while walking/running is easier than learning to shoot while riding a horse. Also...no. Historical archers did not shoot multiple arrows at once, or curve them around walls. They weren't magic, and they weren't Legolas. European longbow archers fired volleys from a mostly standing position, like you see people in the 1700s using muskets while lined up. Modern trick archers can do very impressive things, but they have much lower draw-weight bows, and fire arrows that might not make it through even the light cloth armor that the worst equipped soldiers would have.
Also, that centaurs are moving their own bodies rather than controlling a separate creature while trying to aim and shoot. It’s just a smaller mental load.
This video is the perfect encapsulation of how the Adventure Zone works. Starts dumb; gets fun; ends as a logical narrative with an engrossing plot twist. Powerful.
Trenches and people in the trees also will fuck with centaurs. Also I love that one minute Griffin’s like “whoa it’s racist assume they eat oats” and then later points out they’d only need to eat apples. Oof
Likely the most effective form of battle against centaurs would be hit and run tactics, skirmishes, trench warfare, and the usage of mining shafts/underground caves, as a centaur likely being over 8 feet tall, would be unable to use cramped 2-4 ft tall mine shaft and cave entrances that humans could easily bend over and crawl into. Secondly, as a centaur would theoretically be of the same proportions as a horse, but with a human torso in place of a horses head, attacks from behind would be crippling and likely fatal, without medical attention from another centaur, as their arms would not be able to reach past their rib cages. Thirdly using tactics similar to the Vietcong humans would easily be able to dig tunnels under centaur camps/cities and destroy them from the inside out. As well as the fact that simple traps, such as a mere hole in the ground, would permanently incapacitate a centaur, as they have no way of removing weight from an injured limb over long periods, which means they cannot recover from broken legs. And finally simple trenches such that were used in WW1 with the addition of ballistae and archers in place of machine guns, the centaurs would be virtually unable to wage full frontal assaults on human camps/outposts rendering melee combat pointless, and with humans being smaller and much more maneuverable than GIANT HORSE PEOPLE, humans could easily post themselves on mountaintops, treetops, and deep pike/spear filled trenches resulting in the centaurs being unable to attack any human camps, outposts, cities/towns, as well as rendering the speed and archery capabilities of the centaurs next to useless. Also, horses are sometimes very defensive, even as much so as dogs, and a horses kick, either with their front legs or with their powerful hind legs, are capable of dealing killing blows to all but the biggest or most agile of creatures including other horses/centaurs.
The trouble, I feel, with this is that it doesn't take into account the mobile nature of centaur populations combined with their enormous capacity for moving heavy weights very quickly. While your points about undermining centaur cities/camps is an excellent one, it also assumes that the centaurs have permanent settlements; the trouble with tunneling is that it's a slow process, and because of their horse bodies, centaurs don't have any immobile population; even infants would be able to move long distances with relative ease. Combine that with the fact that centaurs can haul any kind of siege artillery or other large scale weaponry that humans can haul using horses, likely at greater speeds and defensability due to the lack of needing to coordinate a separate animal, and I would still give the advantage to the centaurs. Even with trenches, there's nothing to say centaurs couldn't build their own catapults or trebuchets with which to launch casks of flammable oil or tar into the human fortifications, while they themselves are sufficiently mobile that traditional siege technology wouldn't functionally work against them; siege weapons only work on stationary populations. This is not to discredit your points! They're all very good. They just rely on centaur populations staying in one place, which I don't see why they would do
somewhat interesting trivia. the reason centaurs are good at bow and arrow. "Man on horse capable of firing bow, while horse is moving" was the absolute apex of military technology until the crossbow got invented. you could not beat Archer Who Can Gallop Away When You Run At Him. it was not possible. a guy whose title was Genghis Khan conquered most of the human race in his lifetime by virtue of discovering an army of cut-rate half-assed centowers can beat several times its weight in non-centaur military forces.
You have a good point, but I would submit this to your consideration: skilled mounted archers are able to turn around on their saddles and shoot backwards. Centowers would be incapable of that.
Vincent Laflamme oh yeah, definitely. but it's theorized that's the place legends of centaurs came from in the first place: Man Riding Horse Shooting Arrow as something that was CLEARLY supernatural and not just, y'know. man riding horse, shooting arrow.
@@xalrath Also, I'd think that centaurs would be much stronger and therefore more capable of wielding larger weapons. Their horsey hearts would be able to pump much more blood around their bodies, so what a big, powerlifting, bodybuilding frame looks like to us is probably pretty lean for centaurs. Plus, their human part is mounted on top of a core of horse body. If you've ever taken a martial arts lesson, pretty much the first thing they teach is to use your whole body when you move, not just your arms - so, even if the arms *weren't* any stronger than a normal human soldier's arms, the centaur would still have a steadier, solid base. I dunno, all of that might be BS, but I just have a strong feeling that centaurs would be way, way stronger than even the fittest human soldiers. And, if they're stronger, they can wield huge polearms, but also way more powerful bows, with far longer range than human bows. Even if the humans really dug in with pike squares, the centaurs could just snipe them off from a distance, knowing that the only weapons that could possibly reach them would be siege engines (and there's no reason to think that the Centaurs couldn't build siege of their own). And if the humans gave chase and went on the offensive, the centaurs would still win because they have the better mobility. The only way I see humans winning is if they have a defensive position with a height advantage, so that the centaurs won't out-range them, or if they've managed to trick the centaurs into crossing terrain that is very bad for hooves, but fine for human feet.
The Chinese had crossbows when Genghis was conquering them. The horse archer was the greatest warrior in the world pretty much up until the invention of the gun.
@@pianofish8572 Well, not really. Sure they were hard to kill, but they could not effectively hold ground on their own not effectively besiege a walled settlement. Siege technology was as much if not more of a reason for the success of Mongol conquest ad much as horse archery. Additionally, heavy infantry can very effectively take arrow fire, and foot archery allows more power and range than mounted archery.
the reason why I said centowers are better at bows and arrows is that they have full control over their lower halves, ergo more stability and control, ergo more precision. shooting from horse back is very difficult, I'd imagine, but for centowers, not so much.
@@heliveruscalion9124 They were just good archers, but in a specific context most archers don't train in. People keep talking about them as if they were magically skilled. Mongols cannot in any believable circumstance beat a centaur archer that is of equal training in archery. They have the same amount, if not even greater amount of training in the specific context they are shooting in, since they can't stop being centaurs, but in addition also has greater control over the horse portion of their bodies. The reason the Mongols were scary was because they could move fast while still firing. As grounded archers, they would be evenly matched with archers of equivalent training. Now imagine the mongols, but greater control over the horse part, meaning more complex formations, no horses bucking their riders, no horse head in the way. The horse part moves exactly in the way that fits best for archery, no inaccurate commands from the rider. On a surface fit for horses, they would be deadly.
you guys are ignoring the fact that centaurs only have one field of view. A horse running blind even over a relatively ideal flat surface is not going to be in a good position and will likely injure itself, and a centaur with a human head will have a single narrower field of view, making it harder to shoot and move simultaneously than for a mounted archer for whom the horse is on more of an autopilot.
on the other hand, horseback archers learn how to sort of ride out the uppy downy part of riding a horse, whereas you can't escape your own vibrations if it's your body.
3:15 Even if the horse doesn't directly fight, it could still be a wild card because there is a fucking horse running around like crazy because it is freaked out by all the fighting. That is still a ton of meat running around and kicking.
Guild of Free Action DnD war horses have spooked all the time. Napoleon couldn’t get the horses to charge the lines at Waterloo since they formed squares. It’s pretty easy historically.
If you want to see Bojack horseman on steroids go look up a equiceph from dungeons and dragons 3.0 edition. Or if you want to see to see Bojack horseman on crack go look up the Tikbalang from Pathfinder bestiary 4.
Juice making solid, intelligent comments about war tactics coupled with the fact he keeps saying cEnTaUhOurs as he explains himself is just fucking incredible
think about this: an army of centaurs would only have to feed themselves, but an army of humans AND horses needs to feed both soldiers and horses, so centaurs would be able to have more supplies
Pomlithe if not more due to the fact that in battle they have to both have to feed movement and battle energy Where ever they went they would be tired from travel/ also horses are less durable than most animals you break their leg they’re done
Pomlithe that’s why the humans have the bonus they’re not worn out by travel (as they’re on horse back) And a centaur would be out if the game if it breaks a leg was the point I was trying to make
they kind of gloss over why centaurs would be better with a bow and arrow. they kind of just, think it's a lore thing, but in reality it makes sense from a physiological standpoint. think about it. if you're riding a horse, and trying to fire an arrow at the same time, you have to account for the horse's movements and your balance on the horse and everything. if you're a centaur, however, you only have to account for YOUR OWN movements, and you're, y'know, attached to the horse parts so it's easier to aim.
I know this is two years ago but I am disappointed no one mentioned how deadly horse kicks can be. Now imagine a human level intelligence purposefully using said kicks and being tactical about their hooves and kickin. Im team centaur.
yeah but the centaur isn't carrying a human on his back. he's just carrying the extra weight of however much more a centaur's human part weighs vs a horse head. Also if your horse gets tired, and you walk, you have just left your horse behind.
I believe there was a case of a horse in WW2 that was delivered supplies between camps in the middle of a battlefield and continued to do so even after its rider was killed and it had been wounded. I dont know how much that pertains to a horse continuing to fight after the rider dies, but it's an interesting story nonetheless
something i've noticed with the mcelroy brothers is that they act like apples and sugar cubes are what horses eat most of the time, instead of pasture (grass and plants on the ground) and hay. i guess it might be part of their joke and i have only recently learned about horses, but yeah.
Personally I would assume that the reason a centaur is great with bow and arrows is that they have a single solid body balanced on 4 horse legs as opposed to a man attempting keeping himself steady atop a horse whilst drawing his bow. A centaur has full control over his speed and how quickly he will reach the enemy so he knows how far to try and shoot the arrow while on the move
"The bond between man and horse is strong." - Someone somewhere **Horse gets hit with arrow** Horse: "A'ight, I'm just going to head up outta here. Fuck y'all, peace!"
Humans would win, and for one simple reason: A centaur wouldn’t be able to siege a castle. Small doorways, stairs, and a lack of ladder climbing prowess would mean the centaurs wouldn’t be able to capture strongholds we made. Wait why do I even care?
What I love most about this bit is that even the suggestion that the question itself limited humans in what they can do was seen as a betrayal of humans, as if they decided what the question-asker wanted to know. Yeah, I'm sure giving the centaurs the advantage in this purely hypothetical exercise is gonna doom us all. "Hey, I think the question was specifically about humans limited to horses" "How dare you side with the centaurs?!"
I mean, centaurs would be jacked as hell, if they have the same strength ratio from legs to arms that we have, they could fold a car like paper, horses are strong af. But a human could just climb a tree or enter a hole, they don't need to deal 100% of the time with the horse part
My husband asked "what if the human part of a centaur came off and it has to struggle to get oats while dead? " Should i trade my husband in for a new one?
“It takes a special kind of horse” *gets flashbacks of playing Skyrim when I was 12 when my horse kicked the shit out of a wolf to help distract it when I killed another one*
No idea why I'm here three years later BUT: Centaurs would have made better archers in a fantasy setting. They've got a higher vantage point to ensure line of sight and accuracy, high mobility, quiver space for DAYS on that horse meat, and most importantly but least mentioned, they're taller. Even if a Centaur wasn't magically or mythically stronger than a man, being taller means more distance between arm and ground, so a Centaur could have wielded a truly massive longbow that wouldn't have been usable for a normal man unless he were somehow 9 feet tall. In short, hypothetical training, types of equipment and technology, and setting aside, from a purely from a mechanical perspective, the average centaur would almost certainly make a far better archer than the average man.
One thing to consider about centaurs and archery is that, unlike a mounted soldier, a centaur doesn't have the horse head in the way and could thus effectively use a longbow, (rather than a bow short enough to move over the horse's head if you need to shoot something in front of you or on your other side) which would be a big advantage on its own. If you add in the extra stability with the horse part being a part of your body rather than a completely separate animal, the difference is pretty substantial.
CENTOWERS
Trojan horse?
This was making me imagine hulking fucking centaurs
senthours*
Sin Towers
I was thinking Sin Towers. Lol.
love how they interpreted the "centaurs are better with bow and arrow" as "they have more skill in archery" rather than the obvious "they have both hands free"
They also don't have a torso-sized object right infront of their face. You could (relatively) accurately ride a horse and fire a bow if you clamp your legs onto the sides of a horse
Ok so do the humans HAVE to be on horses, or can there be bros in the back standing up firing arrows? The question says "humans on horses" but if it's a war you'd think humanity would do everything they could to win. Also what kind of humans? Cus some of the best horse archers in history come from the Central Asian Steppe, so if it's those guys vs Centaurs I think it's pretty even
@skeleton Have you ever read about Mongolian horse archers? Those bastards were insane. I highly doubt a centaur could beat them simply because they don't have to manage a horse. Also, archers most certainly had plenty of experience firing on the move. Humanity may have not been as advanced, but that doesn't mean they were idiots. If archers only ever fought from a standing position, they would be killed very quickly. If I remember correctly, archers could actually do "inhuman" things with their skill. Shooting multiple arrows into separate targets with all arrows fired at once. Extremely long-distance shots. Even curving the trajectory of the arrow to shoot behind walls, which is a far more specific use than it sounds. It's not even close to a right angle unless you specially make the arrows themselves, and I don't think this part has been recorded as used in a real battle.
@@TheCrateOfLemons Learning to hit a target while walking/running is easier than learning to shoot while riding a horse. Also...no. Historical archers did not shoot multiple arrows at once, or curve them around walls. They weren't magic, and they weren't Legolas. European longbow archers fired volleys from a mostly standing position, like you see people in the 1700s using muskets while lined up. Modern trick archers can do very impressive things, but they have much lower draw-weight bows, and fire arrows that might not make it through even the light cloth armor that the worst equipped soldiers would have.
Also, that centaurs are moving their own bodies rather than controlling a separate creature while trying to aim and shoot. It’s just a smaller mental load.
the fact that they can have a serious debate with actual logic and still pronounce "centaurs" wrong absolutely amazes me
Lightupheelies that’s the one thing?
It's a hard K
Sin Towers?
@josie * theyre intentionally pronouncing it wrong. Lol
"Horse head human body"
That's Bojack and he's clinically depressed.
Oh no it just reminds me of Pam body garf head and garf head Pam body
At least he is horse hung(rim shot plays) I'll see myself out.
This video is the perfect encapsulation of how the Adventure Zone works.
Starts dumb; gets fun; ends as a logical narrative with an engrossing plot twist.
Powerful.
This bit is also referenced in Story and Song, when they have to fight a centaur. Ouroboros!
and the question was sent in by Drew DAVENPORT...
@@hubberducky no u
A centaur can tie a jacket around their waist and still have it draped over their shoulders...
where would Centaurman wear his cape?
I love how seriously the boys are discussing this
No one:
Griffin: Centaughwrs
Sin towers
WE NEED TO STOP MAKIMG MIXUPS IN GOD'S CHIPOTLE
Basil Ortiz we are all mixups in God’s Chipotle...
Trenches and people in the trees also will fuck with centaurs.
Also I love that one minute Griffin’s like “whoa it’s racist assume they eat oats” and then later points out they’d only need to eat apples. Oof
9:20 "my ability to get off a horse is the only thing separating me from centaurs" dying.
Likely the most effective form of battle against centaurs would be hit and run tactics, skirmishes, trench warfare, and the usage of mining shafts/underground caves, as a centaur likely being over 8 feet tall, would be unable to use cramped 2-4 ft tall mine shaft and cave entrances that humans could easily bend over and crawl into.
Secondly, as a centaur would theoretically be of the same proportions as a horse, but with a human torso in place of a horses head, attacks from behind would be crippling and likely fatal, without medical attention from another centaur, as their arms would not be able to reach past their rib cages.
Thirdly using tactics similar to the Vietcong humans would easily be able to dig tunnels under centaur camps/cities and destroy them from the inside out. As well as the fact that simple traps, such as a mere hole in the ground, would permanently incapacitate a centaur, as they have no way of removing weight from an injured limb over long periods, which means they cannot recover from broken legs.
And finally simple trenches such that were used in WW1 with the addition of ballistae and archers in place of machine guns, the centaurs would be virtually unable to wage full frontal assaults on human camps/outposts rendering melee combat pointless, and with humans being smaller and much more maneuverable than GIANT HORSE PEOPLE, humans could easily post themselves on mountaintops, treetops, and deep pike/spear filled trenches resulting in the centaurs being unable to attack any human camps, outposts, cities/towns, as well as rendering the speed and archery capabilities of the centaurs next to useless.
Also, horses are sometimes very defensive, even as much so as dogs, and a horses kick, either with their front legs or with their powerful hind legs, are capable of dealing killing blows to all but the biggest or most agile of creatures including other horses/centaurs.
Best comment. I'm sorry I can only like once. . . Do you play the dungeons and the dragons?
@@andy10121984 No I dont play, but I do watch Critical Role, what about you?
@@Blade-qe3uy every weekend. it's the game i wish every other game was more like it.
Nonono. Centaurs can't really climb. Just exploit their inability to move vertically.
The trouble, I feel, with this is that it doesn't take into account the mobile nature of centaur populations combined with their enormous capacity for moving heavy weights very quickly. While your points about undermining centaur cities/camps is an excellent one, it also assumes that the centaurs have permanent settlements; the trouble with tunneling is that it's a slow process, and because of their horse bodies, centaurs don't have any immobile population; even infants would be able to move long distances with relative ease. Combine that with the fact that centaurs can haul any kind of siege artillery or other large scale weaponry that humans can haul using horses, likely at greater speeds and defensability due to the lack of needing to coordinate a separate animal, and I would still give the advantage to the centaurs. Even with trenches, there's nothing to say centaurs couldn't build their own catapults or trebuchets with which to launch casks of flammable oil or tar into the human fortifications, while they themselves are sufficiently mobile that traditional siege technology wouldn't functionally work against them; siege weapons only work on stationary populations.
This is not to discredit your points! They're all very good. They just rely on centaur populations staying in one place, which I don't see why they would do
This might be one of the greatest segments of MBMBaM. They completely forgot about the microphones and were just into the topic.
y'all sleeping on the fact that 2 centaurs that are best friends have the power of 4 centaurs
I love how much Griffin changed sides the whole argument
“We got to promise them liberty, we got to promise them freedom”
What’s up everybody, I think HORSES should VOTE!
"horse body, horse neck, human head"
MY HORSE PRINCE???
somewhat interesting trivia. the reason centaurs are good at bow and arrow.
"Man on horse capable of firing bow, while horse is moving" was the absolute apex of military technology until the crossbow got invented. you could not beat Archer Who Can Gallop Away When You Run At Him. it was not possible. a guy whose title was Genghis Khan conquered most of the human race in his lifetime by virtue of discovering an army of cut-rate half-assed centowers can beat several times its weight in non-centaur military forces.
You have a good point, but I would submit this to your consideration: skilled mounted archers are able to turn around on their saddles and shoot backwards. Centowers would be incapable of that.
Vincent Laflamme oh yeah, definitely. but it's theorized that's the place legends of centaurs came from in the first place: Man Riding Horse Shooting Arrow as something that was CLEARLY supernatural and not just, y'know. man riding horse, shooting arrow.
@@xalrath Also, I'd think that centaurs would be much stronger and therefore more capable of wielding larger weapons. Their horsey hearts would be able to pump much more blood around their bodies, so what a big, powerlifting, bodybuilding frame looks like to us is probably pretty lean for centaurs. Plus, their human part is mounted on top of a core of horse body. If you've ever taken a martial arts lesson, pretty much the first thing they teach is to use your whole body when you move, not just your arms - so, even if the arms *weren't* any stronger than a normal human soldier's arms, the centaur would still have a steadier, solid base.
I dunno, all of that might be BS, but I just have a strong feeling that centaurs would be way, way stronger than even the fittest human soldiers. And, if they're stronger, they can wield huge polearms, but also way more powerful bows, with far longer range than human bows. Even if the humans really dug in with pike squares, the centaurs could just snipe them off from a distance, knowing that the only weapons that could possibly reach them would be siege engines (and there's no reason to think that the Centaurs couldn't build siege of their own). And if the humans gave chase and went on the offensive, the centaurs would still win because they have the better mobility.
The only way I see humans winning is if they have a defensive position with a height advantage, so that the centaurs won't out-range them, or if they've managed to trick the centaurs into crossing terrain that is very bad for hooves, but fine for human feet.
The Chinese had crossbows when Genghis was conquering them. The horse archer was the greatest warrior in the world pretty much up until the invention of the gun.
@@pianofish8572 Well, not really. Sure they were hard to kill, but they could not effectively hold ground on their own not effectively besiege a walled settlement. Siege technology was as much if not more of a reason for the success of Mongol conquest ad much as horse archery. Additionally, heavy infantry can very effectively take arrow fire, and foot archery allows more power and range than mounted archery.
Do you think love can bloom... even on the battlefield?
Neigh... whinny.
I think about this MBMBAM all the time
the reason why I said centowers are better at bows and arrows is that they have full control over their lower halves, ergo more stability and control, ergo more precision. shooting from horse back is very difficult, I'd imagine, but for centowers, not so much.
To be honest, the Mongols were pretty great horse archers
@@heliveruscalion9124 They were just good archers, but in a specific context most archers don't train in. People keep talking about them as if they were magically skilled.
Mongols cannot in any believable circumstance beat a centaur archer that is of equal training in archery.
They have the same amount, if not even greater amount of training in the specific context they are shooting in, since they can't stop being centaurs, but in addition also has greater control over the horse portion of their bodies.
The reason the Mongols were scary was because they could move fast while still firing. As grounded archers, they would be evenly matched with archers of equivalent training.
Now imagine the mongols, but greater control over the horse part, meaning more complex formations, no horses bucking their riders, no horse head in the way. The horse part moves exactly in the way that fits best for archery, no inaccurate commands from the rider. On a surface fit for horses, they would be deadly.
you guys are ignoring the fact that centaurs only have one field of view. A horse running blind even over a relatively ideal flat surface is not going to be in a good position and will likely injure itself, and a centaur with a human head will have a single narrower field of view, making it harder to shoot and move simultaneously than for a mounted archer for whom the horse is on more of an autopilot.
Wait... Are you saying that you are, in fact, the Yahoo commenter cited by Griffin in the course of this discussion?!
on the other hand, horseback archers learn how to sort of ride out the uppy downy part of riding a horse, whereas you can't escape your own vibrations if it's your body.
"Every day is a gift, that's why it's called the present"
i love this boi
master oogway from kung fu panda said that
My dad says that
“Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the present.”
- Master Oogway / Eleanor Roosevelt
3:15 Even if the horse doesn't directly fight, it could still be a wild card because there is a fucking horse running around like crazy because it is freaked out by all the fighting. That is still a ton of meat running around and kicking.
Horses that are used for combat are trained not to get spooked. War horses.
@@andy10121984 war horses? You mean warses.
Guild of Free Action DnD war horses have spooked all the time. Napoleon couldn’t get the horses to charge the lines at Waterloo since they formed squares. It’s pretty easy historically.
Guild of Free Action DnD lol.....ok.
hmm. boobytrap your horses with a dead-man's switch. if you are de-horsed without shutting it off manually, it explodes.
Lord of the Rings: The Cen-Towers.
i love how the question insinuates that swords and spears are fantasy
this was the first full mbmbam episode i had listened to, after being a fan of taz and monster factory for years prior. this bit instantly sold me.
You guys are overlooking Elephant husbandry
Isn't "horse head, human body" Bojack Horseman?
Dorothy DeCann lol it kind of is
Oh boy
or, just Horseman, ;-)
If you want to see Bojack horseman on steroids go look up a equiceph from dungeons and dragons 3.0 edition. Or if you want to see to see Bojack horseman on crack go look up the Tikbalang from Pathfinder bestiary 4.
And guess what Bojack Horseman is? A furry. It all comes back to furries
Juice making solid, intelligent comments about war tactics coupled with the fact he keeps saying cEnTaUhOurs as he explains himself is just fucking incredible
I don't know that I ever really appreciated what a journey this was
listening to this AFTER watching Centaurworld hits different
think about this: an army of centaurs would only have to feed themselves, but an army of humans AND horses needs to feed both soldiers and horses, so centaurs would be able to have more supplies
Kenyatta Mancini then you hit their supplies when you launch an attack
But centaur’s totally gotta use more energy, since they have Man Brain on Horse AND Man Body. So it’s possible that they use the same energy.
Pomlithe if not more due to the fact that in battle they have to both have to feed movement and battle energy
Where ever they went they would be tired from travel/ also horses are less durable than most animals you break their leg they’re done
@@matthewcranford5912 I mean, yeah, but... why wouldn't the same be true of centaurs? If they got horse body, they got horse weakness.
Pomlithe that’s why the humans have the bonus they’re not worn out by travel (as they’re on horse back)
And a centaur would be out if the game if it breaks a leg was the point I was trying to make
i don't know how to pronounce centaur anymore
Sen-tor
Sen-tar
sen-tau-rrrrrrrrr
son-too-wers
they kind of gloss over why centaurs would be better with a bow and arrow. they kind of just, think it's a lore thing, but in reality it makes sense from a physiological standpoint. think about it. if you're riding a horse, and trying to fire an arrow at the same time, you have to account for the horse's movements and your balance on the horse and everything. if you're a centaur, however, you only have to account for YOUR OWN movements, and you're, y'know, attached to the horse parts so it's easier to aim.
I know this is two years ago but I am disappointed no one mentioned how deadly horse kicks can be. Now imagine a human level intelligence purposefully using said kicks and being tactical about their hooves and kickin. Im team centaur.
"Every day is a gift, that's why it's called the present" really got me. Was not prepared for that kind of life-changing motivation in this debate.
"Oh yes, oats me dawg" had me gasping for air
People could last longer. Cuz if the horse is tired you can walk. If you're tired your can ride. When a centuars out of stamina they're done.
Veronica Swihart humans have some of the best stamina of every animal species
Why can the human and horse walk when the human is tired but the centaur can't walk when it's tired?
yeah but the centaur isn't carrying a human on his back. he's just carrying the extra weight of however much more a centaur's human part weighs vs a horse head. Also if your horse gets tired, and you walk, you have just left your horse behind.
i’m deathly terrified of horses, but if i were ever to own a horse, i would *absolutely* name it murderbiscuit
14:59 this causes that cursed dating sim
I believe there was a case of a horse in WW2 that was delivered supplies between camps in the middle of a battlefield and continued to do so even after its rider was killed and it had been wounded.
I dont know how much that pertains to a horse continuing to fight after the rider dies, but it's an interesting story nonetheless
They’re taking this question so seriously it’s hilarious 😂 I love these guys
Sugar cuuubes
Why were ladders never mentioned?
Ladders Ban to OP. But yea we have Serious verticality that they can't match
I have never seen a horse with a human on them climbing a ladder.
centaurs could theoretically build and use stepladders, just not rung ladders. and they'd have to be _fucking_ beefy to support their weight.
this is the most important thing these boys have ever discussed on the show
This is one of their best questions ever.
I regularly come back to this just for the opening, like, twenty seconds
We need this talk on 60 seconds
What is with the McElroy brothers and messing up the names of magical creatures and sticking with it?
It's funny and they like making people laugh.
Oh no, they didn't know about joe when this came out...
oh no cause its made up bullshit?
I’m so proud of these precious boys for trying their best and figuring out the *correct* answer to this question 😊
it's so rare a subject is equally fun to take seriously and goof on.
@@KairuHakubi yee XD
that held-in travis laugh... oh my god. i've replayed it 8 times
centaʊr
have centaurs ever felt anger 2?
8:08 equestrianage
Okay, but can I also point out that Centaurs also can't really climb? Just build super well armed towers. It's not like they can just grapple hook up.
Like didn't they make great swords to cleave the legs off of horses, if humans could dismount they win
This helped me get up this morning, thank you
The way he says ‘sugar cubes’ has destroyed me
this is my new go-to get to know you question
something i've noticed with the mcelroy brothers is that they act like apples and sugar cubes are what horses eat most of the time, instead of pasture (grass and plants on the ground) and hay. i guess it might be part of their joke and i have only recently learned about horses, but yeah.
There's a reason why you don't give these boys a few seconds to think, too much brain charge.
I can't stop coming back to this.
at a certain point of this clip they start radiating serious Garfield Monstrosity vibes
"sometimes i can sense a smile in you" sounds exactly like something my old therapist would say
“Cen-tower”
Oof. That Joe Biden joke did not age well.
yeahhh
Don’t worry, it just keep aging worse
I came here to comment the same thing, it actually is so much worse...
Sal Sanchez just like him
With every week it gets worse
Personally I would assume that the reason a centaur is great with bow and arrows is that they have a single solid body balanced on 4 horse legs as opposed to a man attempting keeping himself steady atop a horse whilst drawing his bow. A centaur has full control over his speed and how quickly he will reach the enemy so he knows how far to try and shoot the arrow while on the move
hear me out, centaur with a siege weapon mounted on its horse butt
What if the centowers that were sent too far back in time are actually the ancestors of humans and horses?
That was the plot of Gall Force.
imo this is the best question ever on mbmbam
this might be my fav mbmbam bit of all time
Centowers will win until Gandalf shows up.
The malicious laughter at 11:07 is just 👌👌👌
This is the plot of Centaurworld
"The bond between man and horse is strong." - Someone somewhere
**Horse gets hit with arrow**
Horse: "A'ight, I'm just going to head up outta here. Fuck y'all, peace!"
this is the bit that got me into mbmbam
Y'all forgot spears and other polearms
Humans would win, and for one simple reason: A centaur wouldn’t be able to siege a castle. Small doorways, stairs, and a lack of ladder climbing prowess would mean the centaurs wouldn’t be able to capture strongholds we made. Wait why do I even care?
This is the real answer.
i felt relief
yeah well humans wouldn't be able to reach the high shelves in centaur houses, so there!
What I love most about this bit is that even the suggestion that the question itself limited humans in what they can do was seen as a betrayal of humans, as if they decided what the question-asker wanted to know.
Yeah, I'm sure giving the centaurs the advantage in this purely hypothetical exercise is gonna doom us all.
"Hey, I think the question was specifically about humans limited to horses"
"How dare you side with the centaurs?!"
I mean, centaurs would be jacked as hell, if they have the same strength ratio from legs to arms that we have, they could fold a car like paper, horses are strong af. But a human could just climb a tree or enter a hole, they don't need to deal 100% of the time with the horse part
I don’t want Joe Biden anywhere near my back.
why?
That should totally be a DnD character, a horse avenging its rider
t s ó l a r i a well roleplayed cavalier?
Beeeaaaaannnns
My husband asked "what if the human part of a centaur came off and it has to struggle to get oats while dead? "
Should i trade my husband in for a new one?
CallMeFreakFujiko right now
This is Centaurworld
“It takes a special kind of horse” *gets flashbacks of playing Skyrim when I was 12 when my horse kicked the shit out of a wolf to help distract it when I killed another one*
No idea why I'm here three years later BUT: Centaurs would have made better archers in a fantasy setting. They've got a higher vantage point to ensure line of sight and accuracy, high mobility, quiver space for DAYS on that horse meat, and most importantly but least mentioned, they're taller. Even if a Centaur wasn't magically or mythically stronger than a man, being taller means more distance between arm and ground, so a Centaur could have wielded a truly massive longbow that wouldn't have been usable for a normal man unless he were somehow 9 feet tall. In short, hypothetical training, types of equipment and technology, and setting aside, from a purely from a mechanical perspective, the average centaur would almost certainly make a far better archer than the average man.
Can't believe they didn't mention that if a Centaughr dropped their bow or whatever, they would be unable to bend down and pick it up.
nah you kneel down, grab it with the horse-wrist, and pull it up to where the human arm can grab.
One thing to consider about centaurs and archery is that, unlike a mounted soldier, a centaur doesn't have the horse head in the way and could thus effectively use a longbow, (rather than a bow short enough to move over the horse's head if you need to shoot something in front of you or on your other side) which would be a big advantage on its own. If you add in the extra stability with the horse part being a part of your body rather than a completely separate animal, the difference is pretty substantial.
I lost it at the human/centower team-up train of thought. XD
By the nature of the question, wouldn't any human espionage have to have the horse as a participant to be a valid wartime tactic in this scenario?
A horse can still see where it's going when the rider is aiming a bow, a centaur can only do one or the other
What a trip!
Centaouers
O A T S M E D O G
Me: */clicks on video
Video: 17+ minutes
Me: Aw shit, here we go again
god’s chipotle
g
god’s
chipotle
People on horse back will have a disadvantage with any weapon because they have to hold the rains while centaurs have their hands free x
Ooooooooh, you're going into literal "Yahoo" territory (Gulliver's Travels)