Real Lawyer Reacts to It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia - McPoyle v. Ponderosa (Bird Law!)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
  • ⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! legaleagle.lin... ⚖️
    Charlie, Dennis, Mac, and Frank get involved with Bill Ponderosa, a defendant in a civil suit for putting bath salts in the milk at Liam McPoyle’s wedding to his sister Maureen. Liam McPoyle teams up with The Lawyer to sue Bill Ponderosa for his lost eye; old grievances resurface. At the climax, Charlie tries to cross examine Royal McPoyle, the McPoyle family’s bloodthirsty pet Pocono Swallow. Uncle Jack. The Lawyer. Bill and Maureen Ponderosa. The entire McPoyle clan. Bird law. McPoyle vs. Ponderosa: THE TRIAL OF THE CENTURY
    Stay until the end for my Legal Realism Grade!
    New episodes weekly! Subscribe here:
    www.youtube.co...
    You can find more Real Lawyer Reacts Here (including my reaction to Suits, Better Call Saul, A Few Good Men and tons more): goo.gl/42fKce
    ★ A Few of My Favorite Things★
    (clicking the links really helps out the channel)
    Custom Suits: legaleagle.lin...
    Ties: fave.co/2ImLY9I
    Tie Clips/Bars: amzn.to/2WIQ6EE
    Pocket Squares: amzn.to/2UfsKtL
    ▶ Why Indochino Suits? (50% off Premium Suits + free shipping) [legaleagle.lin...]: Off-the-rack suits NEVER fit right. Indochino makes fully custom suits that fit perfectly using any material I want, with all of the options I want. And they cost 1/3rd of what normal suits costs. I’ve purchased them with my own money for years, so I’m thrilled they are now a sponsor.
    ▶ Why Ties from TheTieBar? (Free shipping on orders over $50) [fave.co/2ImLY9I]: Normal ties are too fat. Skinny ties are too skinny. So these days I only wear ties that are exactly 2.5” wide. They are fashionable without being hipster. You see them in all of my videos. TieBar ties are perfect, come in every color I want, and never cost more than $19.
    ▶ Why these Tie Clips? [amzn.to/2WIQ6EE]: It’s really hard to find affordable tie clips that are the right size (1.5”), look good, and are great quality. These tie bars are all three. Plus the 3-pack gives a variety of styles. They pair perfectly with 2.5” ties from TheTieBar (above).
    ▶ Why these Pocket Squares? [amzn.to/2UfsKtL]: I like my pocket squares perfectly, well, square. Like straight-out-of-Mad-Men square. The only way to do that is with a stiffer material that keeps its shape. I’ve exhaustively tried dozens of pocket squares, and these are by far the best. It’s how I get the perfectly flat pocket square you see in my videos.
    --------------------------------------------------
    I’m sorry, sir, but I am the best bird lawyer in the world.
    I get asked a lot about whether being a practicing attorney is like being a lawyer on TV. I love watching legal movies and courtroom dramas. It's one of the reasons I decided to become a lawyer. But sometimes they make me want to pull my hair out because they are ridiculous. Today I'm taking a break from teaching law students how to crush law school to take on lawyers in the movies and on TV. While all legal movies and shows take dramatic license to make things more interesting (nobody wants to see hundreds of hours of brief writing), many of them have a grain of truth.
    This is part of a continuing series of "Lawyer Reaction" videos. Got a legal movie or TV show you'd like me to critique? Let me know in the comments!
    All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
    Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!
    ========================================================
    ★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ
    ★ More vids on Facebook: ➜ / legaleaglereacts
    ★ Stella’s Insta: / stellathelegalbeagle

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8 тис.

  • @emilycox8551
    @emilycox8551 5 років тому +16685

    Objection: doesn't the name Legal Eagle mislead the jury into believing that you are, in fact, familiar with bird law and the ins and outs thereof

    • @brit2667
      @brit2667 5 років тому +775

      It implies that instead of experiencing the lifestyle of an eagle, he in fact is an eagle

    • @sirgallahad4
      @sirgallahad4 5 років тому +262

      Intervention!

    • @Charok1
      @Charok1 5 років тому +182

      He has a background in Bird Law! Harvey Birdman!

    • @patrickking5835
      @patrickking5835 5 років тому +82

      Your honor, in light of this recently discovery I would ask for a mistrial. If not then I would implore you to fire yourself because you are unable to be unbiased.

    • @dominicsynnock4028
      @dominicsynnock4028 5 років тому +64

      thats a very niche part of bird law, I think you'd need to demonstrate a more in depth knowledge of bird law to be able to claim familiarity with it.

  • @ucanquoteme7404
    @ucanquoteme7404 5 років тому +9068

    Where are these fake hands I keep seeing mentioned in this episode? I only see Uncle Jack's big, masculine hands. Hands that tell a story of greatness. Hands perfect for wrestling with nephews.

    • @seamusmchooligan9212
      @seamusmchooligan9212 5 років тому +167

      Ucann QuoteMe That last line made me spit o.j. on my phone screen. Well done!

    • @TheOldAmishMan
      @TheOldAmishMan 5 років тому +208

      @@seamusmchooligan9212 No it didn't. You did that on purpose, for clout.

    • @alandockery9592
      @alandockery9592 5 років тому +24

      This post pleases Kek. His blessings be upon you.

    • @mgoad08
      @mgoad08 5 років тому +31

      I'm going to stop you there, are you just going to sit there and talk about your hands for a while?

    • @arturarouck17
      @arturarouck17 5 років тому

      i guess you didn't look

  • @christiedt9818
    @christiedt9818 3 роки тому +4180

    Objection: The fact that the writers got EVERYTHING wrong suggests they had to know enough to know what was correct.

    • @GG-bw3uz
      @GG-bw3uz 2 роки тому +271

      Kinda right. Our teacher once gave us an MCQ test in which you had to answer every, every question wrong and the winner would get an iPAD. This was one of those days in which these devices were newly introduced and were all the rage. Dumb as I was, I sadly still didn't pass the test. :P

    • @josephmatthews7698
      @josephmatthews7698 2 роки тому +295

      Yeah its pretty clear the whole point of this episode was to lampoon how ridiculous courtroom dramas are and they did it perfectly.

    • @0Onyx13
      @0Onyx13 2 роки тому +113

      Absolutely, I remember a saying that it's nearly impossible for a student to get all wrong answers on a true/false test, and if someone achieves it, it's more likely that they knew all the answers and marked the wrong ones by choice than pure chance.

    • @Mordecrox
      @Mordecrox 2 роки тому +25

      Like one old strip of Beetle Bailey where sarge is at first proud of him finally devoting himself to study the military regiment, Bailey answers he needs to know the rules to better know how to skirt\break them

    • @undergroundmonorail
      @undergroundmonorail 2 роки тому +13

      @@0Onyx13 is that a real saying or have you mixed it up with a plot point from into the spiderverse :P

  • @flywillis5684
    @flywillis5684 3 роки тому +2441

    It's so interesting watching a non-Sunny watcher getting dropped in after a decade of running gags have been established

  • @Taurickk
    @Taurickk 5 років тому +3052

    Objection: Claiming those are fake hands is speculation. Jack has big hands, they are definitely real hands

    • @CrabJock
      @CrabJock 5 років тому +138

      His hands tell a story...of greatness.

    • @JackKellyBastardMan
      @JackKellyBastardMan 5 років тому +26

      Thank you!

    • @sydstowe6163
      @sydstowe6163 5 років тому +41

      He has man hands, not baby hands

    • @kylemagaro231
      @kylemagaro231 5 років тому +31

      And the man had to go through the horror of his hand spontaneously coming off. We gotta cut him a break.

    • @sandwedge
      @sandwedge 5 років тому +49

      NOBODY LOOK, NOBODY LOOK

  • @RRRRobbbb
    @RRRRobbbb 5 років тому +5675

    This guy clearly went to Harvard, but doesn't know a thing about Bird Law.

    • @clairetuttle7319
      @clairetuttle7319 5 років тому +285

      Bird Law in this country is not governed by reason

    • @broken12smiles
      @broken12smiles 5 років тому +248

      You don't learn about bird law in Harvard. It's a terrible law school.

    • @adrock1011
      @adrock1011 5 років тому +117

      Perhaps he has the brains of a donkey?

    • @soygato2722
      @soygato2722 5 років тому +63

      adrock1011 And we can't have donkeys in court.

    • @NORTEskXIV
      @NORTEskXIV 5 років тому +6

      i know. Its disgraceful

  • @robcranston6030
    @robcranston6030 4 роки тому +4825

    I love hearing a real lawyer actually say “bird law” it means we won on some small level 😂

    • @Matty80822
      @Matty80822 4 роки тому +52

      never been more proud of that becuz salmonella

    • @chrismichael9556
      @chrismichael9556 3 роки тому +36

      Bird Law belongs to Charlie Kelly 😅

    • @jordam200
      @jordam200 3 роки тому +70

      It's only a matter of time before bird law is on the Bar Exam

    • @slashismyhommie8182
      @slashismyhommie8182 3 роки тому +32

      If Legal Eagle hasn't done it before, he should do the World Series Defense episode from Always Sunny.

    • @heathenqueen6468
      @heathenqueen6468 3 роки тому +11

      "We"...? You mean the birds? 🤣

  • @mlmn3080
    @mlmn3080 4 роки тому +2821

    It's just really beautiful seeing someone unfamiliar with Sunny jumping right into the thick of it

    • @brians7901
      @brians7901 3 роки тому +110

      Just made a similar comment. The best thing is his utter confusion

    • @M0053yfate
      @M0053yfate 3 роки тому +106

      I just hope we get a "hero, or hate crime?" verdict lol

    • @xXJerry202Xx
      @xXJerry202Xx 3 роки тому +13

      @@M0053yfate that was one of the best episodes 😂😂

    • @henrywarren5634
      @henrywarren5634 3 роки тому +37

      He missed all the inside jokes and probably thought it was just weird and random

    • @richy1988
      @richy1988 3 роки тому +11

      WILL SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN THE HANDS

  • @toughluck8012
    @toughluck8012 5 років тому +2067

    Didn't even cover the scene where the hand flew off 🙄 how am I supposed to know how legally accurate that scene was

    • @jlupus8804
      @jlupus8804 5 років тому +211

      Yeah, I wanna know the consequences of throwing off my fake hands in the middle of court.

    • @toughluck8012
      @toughluck8012 5 років тому +59

      @@jlupus8804 exactly. I'm glad someone else relates

    • @Lantutt202
      @Lantutt202 5 років тому +68

      or when the judge calls paddy’s pub for the next case

    • @neenjaturtle
      @neenjaturtle 4 роки тому +91

      Clearly he's respecting the fact that Uncle Jack asked nobody to look.

    • @larrymcjones
      @larrymcjones 4 роки тому +46

      NOBODY LOOK! NOBODY LOOK!

  • @jasonkersey89
    @jasonkersey89 3 роки тому +2294

    Between Maureen being a cat, the fake hands, bird law and so much more, this would be a WILD and confusing episode for someone unfamiliar who hasn't seen more episodes of Always Sunny.

    • @richy1988
      @richy1988 3 роки тому +103

      And then we go "JUDGE THIS BASED ON COMMON SENSE AND LAW, DO IT"

    • @badbadbeans6659
      @badbadbeans6659 3 роки тому +10

      Even for someone who had. Still hate this episode.

    • @jamesthomas9619
      @jamesthomas9619 3 роки тому +30

      I feel like this guy literally never heard of this show before this segment

    • @KaregoAt
      @KaregoAt 2 роки тому +93

      @@badbadbeans6659 Hate?? It's fantastic!

    • @maxbracegirdle9990
      @maxbracegirdle9990 2 роки тому +43

      @@badbadbeans6659 Boo. This is one of the best episodes of the season it's in and maybe even the seasons around it. What don't you like about it??

  • @xXLoonoeXx
    @xXLoonoeXx 5 років тому +750

    This lawyer clearly doesn't drink any fight milk, he's not fighting like a crow, he's fighting like bastard man.

    • @brysfirstprize6469
      @brysfirstprize6469 5 років тому

      He needs Riot Juice

    • @angryjoe4939
      @angryjoe4939 5 років тому +2

      Grease Fire aye The Siamese Dream pic

    • @bathoryaria4127
      @bathoryaria4127 5 років тому +3

      Very nice display picture. One of the best albums ever.

    • @xXLoonoeXx
      @xXLoonoeXx 5 років тому +2

      Love Gestapo Agreed, incredibly happy that they're going to release a new album

    • @angryjoe4939
      @angryjoe4939 5 років тому

      Grease Fire Hell Yeah

  • @AnikanAndrew31
    @AnikanAndrew31 Рік тому +502

    He cut out the best part, where Uncle Jack points his finger and his fake hand comes flying off, as he’s screaming, “nobody look, nobody look, nobody look!” 😂🤣🤣

    • @mollusckscramp4124
      @mollusckscramp4124 Рік тому +23

      I know! I was waiting for that 😂

    • @HeisMertz_
      @HeisMertz_ Рік тому +40

      Hey I thought Uncle Jack requested a motion to strike the fake hands comment from the record!

  • @Calilou52
    @Calilou52 5 років тому +2825

    Never heard of bird law? Yeah this dude definitely aint a real lawyer. Bird law is the first thing you learn in law school, everyone knows that

    • @BaalsMistress
      @BaalsMistress 5 років тому +76

      Objection, the topic is not Bird Law, but Bird Lore.

    • @originalsugarcake
      @originalsugarcake 5 років тому +87

      In most countries, bird law is taught at bird law school, which is separate from normal law school.

    • @jesusnthedaisychain
      @jesusnthedaisychain 5 років тому +33

      Don't you dare besmirch his honor, lest you find yourself in a duel. That's just my legal advice for you.

    • @Calilou52
      @Calilou52 5 років тому +8

      Don't you dare besmirch his honor, lest you find yourself in a duel. That's just my legal advice for you.

    • @clintlarvenz2570
      @clintlarvenz2570 5 років тому +7

      And here I thought it was Tree law...

  • @Lil_Gorgon
    @Lil_Gorgon 5 років тому +1489

    Of course the REAL issue is that you can't examine 2 witnesses at the same time, not that Charlie asked an ornithologist to speak bird parseltongue

    • @trifontrifonov4297
      @trifontrifonov4297 3 роки тому +46

      To be fair not the dumbest/fake professional witness testimony that has been accepted in an American court.

    • @steveomac385
      @steveomac385 3 роки тому +28

      @@souler__ no it specifically only allows you to communicate with serpents...

    • @steveomac385
      @steveomac385 3 роки тому +8

      @@souler__ um no you're wrong. You should Google before making such dumb comments.

    • @catra195
      @catra195 3 роки тому +10

      I like how no one is congratulating Carl for making it from a on the beat street cop to a Judge. Guess they don't like seeing a black man rise

    • @daftbanna7202
      @daftbanna7202 2 роки тому +1

      @@souler__ You're so wrong 😭

  • @gazblackheart4596
    @gazblackheart4596 5 років тому +692

    He wasn't prepared for the nonsense he was about to view lol.

    • @nf4866
      @nf4866 5 років тому +50

      And he dove straight into the deep end.

    • @gazblackheart4596
      @gazblackheart4596 5 років тому +43

      yea but long time viewers just kinda get used to the madness he was just like wtf is going on

    • @ChaosTheory9
      @ChaosTheory9 5 років тому +14

      Yeah didn’t even start from season 1 just straight into the absurd ness of the later seasons! Lmao!

    • @magtovi
      @magtovi 5 років тому +8

      "This is getting weird"

    • @ChaosTheory9
      @ChaosTheory9 5 років тому +4

      Marcus Middleton why explain them?! Don’t you know? His hands...tell a story....

  • @Willy_the_gunslingin_studentOD
    @Willy_the_gunslingin_studentOD 3 роки тому +260

    I would 100% allow this entire case to go through to the end. It's too important for the advancements of bird law

  • @CGINFINITY
    @CGINFINITY 5 років тому +1596

    Yeah but let's say you and Charlie Kelley go toe to toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor.

    • @heeres_johnnyy_2179
      @heeres_johnnyy_2179 4 роки тому +101

      Clearly you know nothing about the law and have a tenuous grasp on the English language in genaral

    • @DojoTheJo
      @DojoTheJo 4 роки тому +103

      Uh, Fillibuster.

    • @Euronymooose
      @Euronymooose 4 роки тому +29

      @@DojoTheJo he's pleading the fifth

    • @CGINFINITY
      @CGINFINITY 4 роки тому +25

      Clearly this man is also versed in bird law, or why else would he be called legal eagle. I rest my case.

    • @parmesancheese1052
      @parmesancheese1052 3 роки тому +2

      @@heeres_johnnyy_2179 I've never cringed so hard before until I read your comment, holy shit.

  • @prodajie
    @prodajie 5 років тому +670

    A big part of Always Sunny's comedic formula involves an ever growing discography of recurring in-jokes with with audience. The bird law gag goes back to an earlier season and was fairly well established by this point. The hands gag is based on the character having small hands and being hyper sensitive about it. I love this absurd show to death.

    • @KyleHarrisonRedacted
      @KyleHarrisonRedacted 5 років тому +20

      Like Arrested Development in many ways. My brother would get blitzed to watch AD, and be unamused when he couldn't remember even the most basic of references.
      Not everything is better enjoyed high lmao

    • @prodajie
      @prodajie 5 років тому +37

      @Kyle Harrison, Good call. AD broke the mold. The 1st 3 seasons are pure gold. Before bird law there was "bob loblaw's law blog".

    • @dynamichunter843
      @dynamichunter843 5 років тому +7

      The recurring joke/gag theme really gets me to love shows like Sunny. Same thing happened when I watched Trailer Park Boys!

    • @memento7979
      @memento7979 5 років тому +1

      @@dynamichunter843 BOTTLE KIDS!

    • @dralenvan
      @dralenvan 5 років тому +1

      @@dynamichunter843 TPB was, just like Always Sunny, a beautiful constant impending trainwreck.

  • @henryasselin123
    @henryasselin123 5 років тому +1853

    Why does he keep saying Charlie's uncle is wearing fake hands? Clearly he just has large manly hands

    • @Willskull
      @Willskull 5 років тому +63

      IKR?! I wish he would put his hands over mine so it would look bigger

    • @TalynStormcrow
      @TalynStormcrow 5 років тому +15

      Slander!

    • @bubbadagger
      @bubbadagger 5 років тому +9

      Can i....see those hands again? Just for a quick....

    • @airlopez21
      @airlopez21 5 років тому +12

      Very masculine indeed.

    • @joshhout7143
      @joshhout7143 5 років тому +7

      Henry Asselin "my hands tell a story"

  • @panthastaa34
    @panthastaa34 4 роки тому +103

    I just absolutely love the fact Guillermo Del Toro plays Papi McPoyle

    • @demian5631
      @demian5631 2 роки тому +15

      Holy shit, he actually does!

  • @Protagoras614
    @Protagoras614 5 років тому +1259

    OBJECTION!!! Bird law did not originate in this episode, it had been talked about by Charlie for many years prior to this episode. The episode in question, "McPoyle vs. Ponderosa: The Trial of the Century ", was the culmination of a long running joke with roots going all the way back to October 18, 2007 when Charlie Kelly first began his law practice in the episode "Mac is a Serial Killer" and as early as September 17, 2009 in the episode "The Gang Exploits the Mortgage Crisis" Charlie Kelly Esq. revealed that he had found his niche in the legal community and had begun to specialize in the area of Bird Law.

    • @katiekeenan
      @katiekeenan 5 років тому +69

      Jack Bonar Sustained! Charlie Kelly has mentioned his knowledge of Bird Law repeatedly previous to this episode. FIGHT MILK CAWW

    • @celia9112
      @celia9112 5 років тому +5

      Great research!

    • @Kickflips22
      @Kickflips22 5 років тому +3

      Well done

    • @duncanshepherd1631
      @duncanshepherd1631 5 років тому +42

      This episode was great, but it's built on so many references and callbacks that you can't only watch this one in a bubble

    • @MrMitchFish
      @MrMitchFish 5 років тому +22

      This is why sunny is so great. They take a small joke or personality trait and build on it in a hilarious way. Like maureen being a cat more, Charley's uncles insecurity with his hands etc, all mentioned before but much more subtly.

  • @gabiluch87
    @gabiluch87 5 років тому +803

    "It's all ridiculous, it doesn't seem relevant at all and it's a 100% improper" That pretty much sums up "It's always sunny" quite perfectly

  • @Logai74
    @Logai74 5 років тому +819

    I can’t trust a lawyer with such small hands.

    • @AsadtheTutor
      @AsadtheTutor 5 років тому

      OVERRULED. Men with small hands can be magical.

    • @fulcrumthebrave5715
      @fulcrumthebrave5715 5 років тому +18

      @@AsadtheTutor False. Men with small hands are evil and cannot be trusted. Much like men who wear tunics.

    • @mrmann44
      @mrmann44 5 років тому +2

      😂😂😂

    • @SLAUGHTERAMA
      @SLAUGHTERAMA 5 років тому +1

      Objection.
      Men with small hands are fine. It's men with small feet that are Satan's footsoldiers leading the innocent to Hell.

    • @AtheistsAreActuallyTheistsProo
      @AtheistsAreActuallyTheistsProo 5 років тому +9

      He's got a really strong jawline so I trust him

  • @jullcepts8780
    @jullcepts8780 Рік тому +121

    I think the most realistic part of the episode is the judge acknowledging how ridiculous and how much of a waste of time that all was

    • @kieranhair37
      @kieranhair37 9 місяців тому +2

      Actually, the most realistic part to me was them bringing drugs into court. Where I live at least, you almost never get searched. Even if you set off the metal detector, they just make you take your belt off. As long as you don't set it off a second time, they assume you've got nothing bad on you. So I call BS on him saying you're "very likely to get searched."

  • @dragonfurry69
    @dragonfurry69 5 років тому +397

    OBJECTION: You should have saved this for an April Fool's Day video and talked about how right Charlie is on bird law. A wasted opportunity if you ask me.

    • @MikeAsbestos
      @MikeAsbestos 5 років тому +12

      I think he wanted people to stop with the bird law stuff

    • @ZetroiLP
      @ZetroiLP 5 років тому +2

      Havery Birdman for april fools

    • @MikeAsbestos
      @MikeAsbestos 5 років тому +4

      @Peteto Chibs He can revisit it on April Fool's and withdraw his present statements. Talk about the way Charlie revolutionized argument and threw the judge for a loop, and that having his case thrown out was a clear act of discrimination against the divine practitioners of bird law

    • @kaitzi
      @kaitzi 5 років тому

      @@MikeAsbestos If so, that backfired

  • @halwakka504
    @halwakka504 5 років тому +517

    Watching someone experience Always Sunny for the first time by jumping right to an episode in season 11 and trying to make sense of it is a riot. Rule #1 is to never, ever, try to make sense of any of it.

    • @zayaplaya1
      @zayaplaya1 5 років тому +29

      Hal Wakka I’m not even sure he realized that this was a comedy

    • @KW-if9wp
      @KW-if9wp 5 років тому +6

      You can make sense of the tiny hands if you’ve seen it before.

    • @austiniscoolduh
      @austiniscoolduh 5 років тому +3

      @@zayaplaya1 LOL he definitely didnt

    • @honeypuff93
      @honeypuff93 5 років тому

      Lol you are so right.

    • @liggerstuxin1
      @liggerstuxin1 5 років тому +7

      Start from season one my friend. You will not be disappointed.

  • @marcusobrien9355
    @marcusobrien9355 5 років тому +2532

    Season 12 episode 6. "Hero or hate crime" awesome episode about lottery ticket ownership with an arbitrator. Take a look

    • @ryanturner6097
      @ryanturner6097 5 років тому +90

      That's my absolute favorite episode

    • @mgoad08
      @mgoad08 5 років тому +19

      DO IT!!!!

    • @donutmultiverse
      @donutmultiverse 5 років тому +20

      Agreed. Fantastic episode.

    • @marcsorensen1184
      @marcsorensen1184 5 років тому +43

      Definitely a great episode..My personal favorite may be The Gang Goes to the Jersey Shore. Dee getting her hair ripped out and Dennis puking on the ride...then smoking angel dust. The boardwalk is definitely not a magical place haha

    • @realleon2328
      @realleon2328 5 років тому +30

      @@marcsorensen1184 not to mention the ever important rum ham

  • @paulamontoya4942
    @paulamontoya4942 3 роки тому +107

    Jack's self conscious about having small hands as a running joke and since the beginning of the series Charlie has wanted to be a lawyer and says he is versed in birdlaw 😂

    • @resistanceisfutile520
      @resistanceisfutile520 Рік тому +10

      Lol when they took the picture together and Jack put his hands beneath the other lawyers hands pretending they were his.😂 comedic golds.

  • @themadplotter
    @themadplotter 5 років тому +1839

    I don't trust this lawyer, how big are his hands?

    • @ErdTirdMans
      @ErdTirdMans 5 років тому +114

      They look considerable, but I don't buy it. I think he had someone lay their hands on top of his for this video.

    • @Luka1180
      @Luka1180 5 років тому +6

      They seem the same size as mine.

    • @StormDatIsApproaching
      @StormDatIsApproaching 5 років тому +29

      And more important, do his hands tell a story?

    • @adamperrine6867
      @adamperrine6867 5 років тому +41

      LMFAO! The best part is when Uncle Jack throws his hand across the room and runs away screaming "NOBODY LOOK, NOBODY LOOK!!" Like nobody saw it

    • @doxenking3899
      @doxenking3899 5 років тому +24

      On the contrary. His hands are big, I think we should settle.

  • @beeble2003
    @beeble2003 5 років тому +1193

    I'm glad that your biggest problem with trying to get evidence from a bird is that there's already one witness on the stand and you can't examine two witnesses at the same time. That was my biggest problem with it, too.

    • @e22ddie46
      @e22ddie46 5 років тому +65

      The next scene is wonderful too. Where the penn professor says he can't speak with birds and Charlie feels his is misled.

    • @neotenken
      @neotenken 5 років тому +3

      My same thought!

    • @Loseirdo
      @Loseirdo 5 років тому +25

      He's referring to the ornithologist, not the bird. Charlie is questioning the ornithologist while he is neither on the stand nor under oath, which is improper. In order for the ornithologist to provide testimony, he would have to be called as a witness.

    • @markvanpopering4598
      @markvanpopering4598 5 років тому +17

      The ornithologist was functioning as a translator, not a witness. I think he would have to,be considered a witness while stating his background though.

    • @troodon1096
      @troodon1096 4 роки тому +2

      Well, also birds can't testify in court (or out of court either, because well, they're birds).

  • @juliancordova5851
    @juliancordova5851 5 років тому +588

    Objection: Bird law originated in a much earlier episode. I believe "The Gang Exploits the mortgage crisis". Edit: Do My Cousin Vinny

    • @Awecyan32
      @Awecyan32 5 років тому +12

      Yup

    • @danjones2164
      @danjones2164 5 років тому +50

      Filibuster

    • @345Taco
      @345Taco 5 років тому +23

      Good call Jabroney

    • @Sam_on_YouTube
      @Sam_on_YouTube 5 років тому +10

      @@danjones2164 That's not how you filibuster. This is how you filibuster.

    • @Sam_on_YouTube
      @Sam_on_YouTube 5 років тому +2

      That's not how you filibuster. This is how you filibuster.

  • @drgonzo305
    @drgonzo305 2 роки тому +121

    You absolutely right, never bring drugs into court. If you have to have drugs in court you should take all the drugs before entering. This way while your waiting on your trial it should give them all time to kick in and should be going strong by the time your case comes up.

    • @tabora_
      @tabora_ 11 місяців тому +2

      🤣🤣 I was gonna say "no shit Sherlock", but you had me in the first half

  • @browndd
    @browndd 5 років тому +301

    Charlie Kelly doesn't have a law degree mainly because he can't read. But he is however the best god damn bird lawyer in the world.

    • @sandwedge
      @sandwedge 5 років тому +13

      He'll adapt.

    • @browndd
      @browndd 5 років тому +6

      @@sandwedge The warthog will take him under his wing and teach him to swim with the sharks.

  • @ericstaples7220
    @ericstaples7220 5 років тому +312

    Bird Law was a running joke that blew up into a full blow episode. It didn't originate in this episode. What makes it really funny is watching the evolution of the joke.

    • @youtubeuser2188
      @youtubeuser2188 5 років тому +22

      The whole episode calls back to the two part wedding episode and Jacks’ long running hand insecurities.

    • @andrewmunds1221
      @andrewmunds1221 5 років тому

      Eric Staples that’s what makes this show so great is that there’s so many running jokes, if you haven’t watched it from the start it won’t be as enjoyable. He said he was confused at multiple points whereas I found it hilarious

  • @drewneedsmoresleep6680
    @drewneedsmoresleep6680 5 років тому +719

    This man, this charlatan pretends to be an expert yet knows nothing, NOTHING about Bird Law. How dare he comment on what is the greatest example of Bird Lawyering ever recorded. Thumbs down!

    • @MrGruzefix
      @MrGruzefix 5 років тому +4

      @The Coward Liberius Hearsay! Overuled!

    • @dustinsmith2021
      @dustinsmith2021 5 років тому +7

      Yeah this legal, "eagle", displays many characteristics of a buttlicker.

  • @sparrow420500
    @sparrow420500 3 роки тому +193

    I want legal eagle to watch more of the show, so he can understand everything the gang has put this lawyer through. Only then will his demeanor and attitude make sense. Over the course of the show they have pushed this poor guy so far that he starts taking cases for free as long as those cases are against the gang.

    • @JakeKoenig
      @JakeKoenig Рік тому +7

      I don't want to watch this humorless Captain Obvious trudge his way through any more Sunny episodes while telling us that **news flash** the trial scenes aren't realistic and don't comply with legal proceedings. Thanks guy, we had no idea! 😮
      Comedy is clearly wasted on this jabroni.

    • @jezpeep538
      @jezpeep538 Рік тому +23

      @@JakeKoenig you willingly clicked on this video, we would be more better without you.

    • @Rob_Cary
      @Rob_Cary 7 місяців тому +2

      How are so many people in the comments mad at the commentator? Lol. This is not a TV show reaction channel. It is obvious that the only reason any Sunny episodes are being reacted to is because it relates to his field. No, he's not going to get the inside jokes lol. My god.

  • @prodajie
    @prodajie 5 років тому +504

    We're both men of the law. You know. We get after it. You know, we
    jabber jaw, we go tit for tat. We have our little differences. But at
    the end of the day, you win some, I win some, and there's a mutual
    respect left over between us. Now, let's say you and I go toe-to-toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor.

    • @ChaosTheory9
      @ChaosTheory9 5 років тому +22

      Proda Jie any respect that you’re feeling that’s coming from me is a mistake on your part!

    • @user-ns3vs3bp3e
      @user-ns3vs3bp3e 5 років тому +5

      Proda Jie nah just challenge him to a duel

    • @slightlycrookedworkshop
      @slightlycrookedworkshop 5 років тому +9

      Filibuster

    • @maxwellcatlett3653
      @maxwellcatlett3653 5 років тому +5

      I feel like I’ve made myself perfectly redundant

    • @mjtingle1
      @mjtingle1 5 років тому +3

      I don't believe you have a firm grasp on law. I honestly dont think you have a realistic grasp on the English language.

  • @bryceolomew
    @bryceolomew 4 роки тому +569

    Objection: ‘Bird Law’ was first referenced in ‘The Gang Exploits the Mortgage Crisis’, season 5.

    • @agny369
      @agny369 3 роки тому +60

      Filibuster ?

    • @bswezea
      @bswezea 2 роки тому +26

      Request for motion to sustain the objection of the filibuster in question by way of people versus parakeet.

  • @keeKeeConnolly
    @keeKeeConnolly 5 років тому +2394

    You literally look like "fancy lawyer man" in It's Always Sunny

    • @seanboland4671
      @seanboland4671 5 років тому +156

      He's got five years until the gang finds him

    • @cupris
      @cupris 5 років тому +58

      I need to see his hands

    • @malcolmsaxton2028
      @malcolmsaxton2028 5 років тому +2

      He does!!!

    • @Juggalotus253
      @Juggalotus253 5 років тому +16

      Extra bonus points because he's wearing a woman's suit jacket like Michael Scott.

    • @TheHawkins455
      @TheHawkins455 5 років тому +22

      @@Juggalotus253 that's funny cause I feel like he has a bit a jim and the lawyer from the show mixed in his looks. And you bring michael Scott's women suit into this lol

  • @jtlieser5821
    @jtlieser5821 3 роки тому +57

    I personally love the scene at the end where after the judge kicks them out he reads his next case and they turn around and take their seats again.

    • @1LostMind
      @1LostMind 3 місяці тому +1

      I believe that case was about the scheme they pulled in the charlie work episode

  • @JackKellyBastardMan
    @JackKellyBastardMan 5 років тому +447

    I don't see any fake hands in this video. Just a bunch of people with real, very normal-sized hands.

  • @misterjive273
    @misterjive273 5 років тому +585

    Nevertheless, Charlie Day is still the best goddamn bird lawyer who has ever lived.

    • @AsadtheTutor
      @AsadtheTutor 5 років тому +5

      SUSTAINED

    • @abyssinia4ever
      @abyssinia4ever 5 років тому +1

      Clearly u haven't heard of the genius Harvey Birdman.

  • @Telruin
    @Telruin 5 років тому +169

    "There are a lot of problems here..." is a good summary of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia.

    • @westberryjim
      @westberryjim 5 років тому +5

      "What is going on here?"

    • @kaitzi
      @kaitzi 5 років тому +1

      @@westberryjim Let's just move past it

  • @Uniscorn123
    @Uniscorn123 3 роки тому +70

    "I give this episode an F"
    Okay, well . . . Filibuster 💁🏻‍♂️

    • @benderman1
      @benderman1 3 роки тому +6

      Do you even know what that means?

    • @BigBrezzy
      @BigBrezzy 3 роки тому +6

      @@benderman1 Yup.

    • @TheBestSam42
      @TheBestSam42 7 місяців тому

      @@benderman1I plead the 5th

  • @WannabeCanadianDev
    @WannabeCanadianDev 5 років тому +678

    >Me, most of the time watching LegalEagle. "This is interesting and fascinating information about a field I am curious about."
    >Me, watching LegalEagle watching Always Sunny: "His obvious suffering amuses me."

  • @GobiLux
    @GobiLux 5 років тому +1149

    It's fun to see somebody who has never watched Always Sunny watch an episode and try to make sense of it!

    • @davidramirez6896
      @davidramirez6896 5 років тому +26

      GobiLux it sounds like he thinks this is a show about a bird lawyer

    • @metalmayhem3622
      @metalmayhem3622 5 років тому +78

      It's frustrating to me, because Sunny is such a developed show. (Like; not knowing what's with the fake hands.)

    • @doctoroctos
      @doctoroctos 5 років тому +13

      It was less entertaining than expected.

    • @redrob6026
      @redrob6026 5 років тому +18

      There is no chance of making sense of always sunny.

    • @Riddlemt
      @Riddlemt 5 років тому +13

      @@redrob6026 It makes perfect sense if you've watched the whole series. Fantastic piece of art.

  • @nickzardiashvili624
    @nickzardiashvili624 5 років тому +422

    I think this lawyer has a case, guys. I mean, his hands are very big and imposing.

    • @InquisitorClock
      @InquisitorClock 5 років тому +34

      His big, strong hands. Hands that tell the story of a man...

    • @Atem_in_the_streets
      @Atem_in_the_streets 5 років тому +13

      I'm intimidated by him

    • @RAE10182504
      @RAE10182504 5 років тому +7

      Great now I'm looking at his hands now! So large!

  • @wesleyfleming7383
    @wesleyfleming7383 2 роки тому +75

    Bird law comes in through out the show. The first time bird law is mentioned is in the mortgage crises episode. It opens with Charlie and Dennis arguing about whether or not you can keep a hummingbird as a pet

  • @StefanLopuszanski
    @StefanLopuszanski 5 років тому +240

    OBJECTION! Those are his real, large, and massive hands. He isn't compensating or wearing anything to make his hands appear larger than normal.

    • @DooMedSean
      @DooMedSean 5 років тому

      NOBODY LOOK! NOBODY LOOK!

  • @pbthirteen
    @pbthirteen 5 років тому +285

    This guy obviously doesn’t understand a thing about birdlaw

  • @Anton-os5lk
    @Anton-os5lk 5 років тому +2362

    "Legaleagle"
    its bird law

    • @kharilester
      @kharilester 5 років тому +61

      You are an unrecognized genius.

    • @JuanPablo-sh9dr
      @JuanPablo-sh9dr 5 років тому +62

      Bird Up

    • @jimbojones1848
      @jimbojones1848 5 років тому +23

      @@JuanPablo-sh9dr ranch me up brotendo

    • @Arcademan09
      @Arcademan09 5 років тому +7

      @@JuanPablo-sh9dr Bird Up? Fuck that, it's all about Snail Down!

    • @jakejonas7366
      @jakejonas7366 5 років тому +4

      Bro....mind blown

  • @ComputerFaceOne
    @ComputerFaceOne 4 роки тому +196

    I love this guy and his videos. That being said, he's trying to analyze the realism in It's Always Sunny and it's killing me LOL

    • @jamesthomas9619
      @jamesthomas9619 3 роки тому +17

      Are you saying Dennis isn't a god?

    • @tomz5704
      @tomz5704 2 роки тому +17

      @@jamesthomas9619 objection: GOLDEN GOD

    • @JakeKoenig
      @JakeKoenig Рік тому

      This is the first video of him that I've ever watched.
      This is the last video of him that I'll ever watch.
      He's kind of a humorless dipshit, if we're being honest. So jot THAT down.

    • @TKize777
      @TKize777 Рік тому +5

      I AM UNTETHERED AND MY RAGE KNOWS NO BOUNDS

  • @peakyswan7719
    @peakyswan7719 4 роки тому +143

    Fun fact: Rob McElhenney who plays Ronald "Mac" Mcdonald appeared on Law & Order in the episode "Thrill" in 1997, where he plays the character "Joey Timon". A character that testifies against his friend Dale "Tagger" Kershaw. Further strengthening the claim that Ronnie is in fact, a rat.

  • @TheSrawsome
    @TheSrawsome 5 років тому +588

    What a crazy episode for someone who has never watched Always Sunny to watch. lmao

    • @JZH10000
      @JZH10000 5 років тому +24

      @@KathyAAllen what are you even trying to say right now

    • @TheSrawsome
      @TheSrawsome 5 років тому +42

      I'm not sure if they're calling the video dumb, or the people commenting? Either way, I disagree.
      This particular ep of Always Sunny is just SO full of long-running gags (for example Bird Law does NOT originate from this ep) that I couldn't imagine watching it without any context.

    • @Terwilligrrr
      @Terwilligrrr 5 років тому +1

      Fancy seeing you here...

    • @Kevthestoner
      @Kevthestoner 5 років тому +17

      @@TheSrawsome , +1 to this, basically every single joke in this episode from the bird law, to the cat lady, to Charlie thinking hes a lawyer, and even the guys big fake hands, are all long running jokes, so im guessing this episode pretty much makes no sense outside of the context lol.

    • @Theunfathomable0
      @Theunfathomable0 5 років тому +5

      That’s what I was gonna say I was just like ...wow he must be soooo confused

  • @funsponge9099
    @funsponge9099 5 років тому +397

    Objection: this mans hands are far too small he couldn't know anything about the law

    • @TGPDrunknHick
      @TGPDrunknHick 5 років тому +26

      You know what they say about men with tiny hands. Horrible Lawyers.

  • @madisonwaycaster9832
    @madisonwaycaster9832 3 роки тому +62

    Objection: I believe this episode was purposefully breaking all of these legal boundaries as a method of absurdist humour.

  • @rubidium3718
    @rubidium3718 4 роки тому +1066

    This basically seems like an actual judge was called to the show, not informed of anything, and that those were his actual reactions.

    • @muppetoverlord2013
      @muppetoverlord2013 4 роки тому +151

      Reginald VelJohnson is very much an actor

    • @WoodstockProd
      @WoodstockProd 4 роки тому +38

      Muppet Overlord that was Reginald VelJohnson? I didn’t even recognize him

    • @WoodstockProd
      @WoodstockProd 4 роки тому +5

      Goah Way I know who he is, I just didn’t recognize him as the judge

    • @saysHotdogs
      @saysHotdogs 4 роки тому +18

      Except that’s Daddy Winslow so...

    • @jagpro91
      @jagpro91 4 роки тому +18

      That's Sgt. Al Powell.

  • @austinglugla
    @austinglugla 5 років тому +178

    Objection: If you were better read on the nuances of bird law, this would of received a much higher grade.

  • @TurdFergusson318
    @TurdFergusson318 5 років тому +479

    Bird law originated in “The Gang Exploits The Mortgage Crisis” episode.

  • @buckb6976
    @buckb6976 3 роки тому +31

    I love that the Legal Eagle waves his hands around when he talks. I also love that he gave the trail an "F" even though he reached the same conclusion as the judge.

  • @harrymcarthur9989
    @harrymcarthur9989 5 років тому +448

    OBJECTION- you're just jealous of the big hands

  • @Sleeepy.
    @Sleeepy. 5 років тому +1202

    Very obviously you don't understand just how good at law Charlie Kelly is. I'll do you a favor and pull some of his better quotes on legal subjects.
    "Listen buddy, I know a lot about the law and various other lawyerings. I'm well educated, well versed, I know that situations like this, real estate wise, they're very complex."
    "I'll take that advice into cooperation alright? Now what's say you and I go toe-to-toe in bird law and see who comes out the victor."
    "Okay well uh... Filibuster."

    • @chickencurry420
      @chickencurry420 5 років тому +67

      "Heretofore document had... dry ink! For... at least many forknights"

    • @MayorOfMidland
      @MayorOfMidland 5 років тому +43

      "Look, we all have hot plates we want to get back to."

    • @JackBeddows
      @JackBeddows 5 років тому +22

      Are you sure some of those aren't Trump quotes? They're almost indistinguishable from Charlie Kelly quotes.

    • @kevincarlos973
      @kevincarlos973 5 років тому +13

      4 THE MARE

    • @tedrusted
      @tedrusted 5 років тому +27

      "Hummingbirds are legal tender."

  • @RoryStarr
    @RoryStarr 5 років тому +567

    They would love that they got an F. The joke that ties the episode together is people who only know law from TV serials decide they can be lawyers. Like most episodes of the show, they are subverting and satirizing various television tropes. That it gets everything wrong was truly their goal.

    • @blegh33
      @blegh33 5 років тому +6

      Wah wah look at me mr smarty pants analysing shit no one asked for wah wah i am so smart im gonna explain the joke to everyone so that its no longer funny waaaah

    • @laurenw3300
      @laurenw3300 4 роки тому +4

      Came here to say the same thing! Exactly!!

    • @nf4866
      @nf4866 4 роки тому +17

      @@blegh33 calm down

    • @JK-zt8wk
      @JK-zt8wk 4 роки тому +3

      @Fats Waller Makes him more smarter*

    • @TheBigShaun100
      @TheBigShaun100 4 роки тому +7

      In order to get everything wrong, you have to know what is right then avoid it.

  • @rahullulla352
    @rahullulla352 2 роки тому +48

    LegalEagle: For portrayal of civil law I give this a F
    Me: For portrayal of bird 🐦 law I give this an A+

  • @Marrrrrzy
    @Marrrrrzy 5 років тому +469

    You totally besmirched him and he demands satisfaction.

    • @Marrrrrzy
      @Marrrrrzy 5 років тому +5

      @Kyle Blank 🙊

    • @Maddie-bb4xg
      @Maddie-bb4xg 3 роки тому +1

      at least it wasn’t in front of a jury of his own peers

  • @KnightsaysNi
    @KnightsaysNi 4 роки тому +541

    Objection: Final grade should be a "C-" as the judge DID throw the case out, although not as soon as he should have done.

    • @QemeH
      @QemeH 4 роки тому +26

      Then I want my C- for writing "A is clearly crazy and gets nothing" on my last law exam after reading the facts of the case :)
      I was right, yet I got an F...

  • @Headshots4Hope
    @Headshots4Hope 5 років тому +297

    If the grade is based on "legal realism", then that F is absolutely warranted, and that's the whole point of this episode. It shows what happens when a gang of narcissists is unleashed in a court proceeding. The result = madness.

    • @Smokecall
      @Smokecall 5 років тому +7

      We Finally see what it takes to be in a courtroom and perForm a Full on F rating of being a good lawyer.
      Only thing that would maybe it get a D- is the Judge but that would outweigh what both lawyers got so wrong

    • @QuasiELVIS
      @QuasiELVIS 5 років тому +9

      What would really happen is they'd all get thrown out in about 5 seconds.

    • @e22ddie46
      @e22ddie46 5 років тому +2

      I'm curious what the other legal episodes get. Especially since I think IASIP is at its actual best when they go out in non-fringe elements of society and the lawyer is my favorite side character I think.

    • @jakobbokaj123
      @jakobbokaj123 5 років тому +1

      except a court would never go along with it, they would all be thrown out very quickly.

    • @thomasca
      @thomasca 5 років тому +1

      Well yes and no. He was also saying they never would have even gotten to court and that everything else was ridiculous too.

  • @JamesBeam420
    @JamesBeam420 2 роки тому +14

    Ok, so about bird law. I once had an issue where birds made a nest in my chimney. Birds were flying into my house, wrecking havoc.
    The first company I called to take care of the situation basically said " Nothing we can do, it's bird law, we can't remove them."
    So basically they told me that the birds now owned my house.
    I called another guy and got it taken care of pronto, but I'll never forget the first person telling me that basically bird law meant the nest in my chimney was illegal to disrupt, and that the birds now owned my property. Lol.

  • @supersizesenpai
    @supersizesenpai 5 років тому +293

    Am I the only one who had a huge cartoonish grin on their face when they saw he was covering one of the funniest episodes of "Its always sunny"? lol

    • @kevinjohnson1139
      @kevinjohnson1139 5 років тому +26

      *Blackprince*
      Watching a lawyer trying to make sense of *It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia?* Priceless.

    • @supersizesenpai
      @supersizesenpai 5 років тому +2

      @@kevinjohnson1139 it really is i couldn't stop laughing.

    • @treborrrrr
      @treborrrrr 5 років тому +2

      When I saw the title and throughout the entire video :D Also felt nice to wash away some of the stink of the last season.

    • @spencerfalzy
      @spencerfalzy 5 років тому +2

      Blackprince I TOTALLY SUGGESTED IT YAY

    • @badoli1074
      @badoli1074 5 років тому +3

      After 30 seconds i was like "This ain't going to be graded anywhere beyond an F..." :D
      He's got beautiful hands though, i think we should settle...

  • @thomasburnell9613
    @thomasburnell9613 5 років тому +1670

    What's with the video of Sweet Dee and the snake?

  • @GonzoShitcock
    @GonzoShitcock 5 років тому +532

    This lawyer is getting overwhelmed with the complete and utter insanity that is "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia"...😂😂😂😂

    • @davechildress4235
      @davechildress4235 5 років тому +2

      Makes you wonder what he would say about Perry mason

  • @CaptainTrips560
    @CaptainTrips560 Рік тому +12

    Imagine if they let LegalEagle guest star as himself to challenge Charlie on Bird Law

  • @EarlofCrawford
    @EarlofCrawford 5 років тому +659

    Objection! Are you licensed to practice Bird Law? I think NOT sir.

    • @juansantos-lq2kz
      @juansantos-lq2kz 5 років тому +40

      I'll allow it because he's got a nice tie. Continue, Counselor.

    • @masterdimsen
      @masterdimsen 5 років тому +33

      Overruled; His name is LegalEagle

    • @dr.jackbright963
      @dr.jackbright963 4 роки тому +11

      Is he allowed to practice African or European swallow law?!

  • @EradicatorJones
    @EradicatorJones 5 років тому +155

    Objection! Legal Eagle did not go through Discovery (previous episodes, episodes after this one) before proceeding to watch this video, therefore he has no relevant information to dispute any of the claims and results of this episode. Sandbagged himself.

  • @generalkenobihellothere7389
    @generalkenobihellothere7389 5 років тому +62

    Objection! Bird law has its origins several seasons prior in a barroom argument concerning whether Dennis own a hummingbird as a pet. As you know he cannot because bird law is not governed by reason.

  • @austintyler7901
    @austintyler7901 3 роки тому +80

    Don't know which is more impressive: that this guy didn't continue riding the wave of one of his most highly viewed episodes, or, that It's Always Sunny scared this guy from ever touching it again with a 10ft pole.

    • @reillymcwriting
      @reillymcwriting 2 роки тому +10

      Which sucks, world series defense would have been AMAZING to watch.

    • @megabladechronicles962
      @megabladechronicles962 2 роки тому +4

      Not necessarily, he did two other episodes

    • @alastorcorvus
      @alastorcorvus Рік тому +3

      wrong, he did Dennis Reynolds: The Cereal Defense and recently, Hero or hate crime?

    • @austintyler7901
      @austintyler7901 Рік тому

      @AlastorCorvus you notice how my comment is from 2 years ago?
      Hope you enjoyed your momentary "well actually" internet boner.

  • @coughee2701
    @coughee2701 5 років тому +530

    The fake hands are explained in earlier episodes, specifically Season 6, Episode 2 "Dennis Gets Divorced". Basically, Jack is very insecure about his small hands. So in the episode you're watching, he's wearing fake, big hands.

    • @ianhinkle2863
      @ianhinkle2863 5 років тому +15

      Agree but I thought it was because they foreshadow that he molested Charlie Kelly when he was a kid. Am I wrong?

    • @daphnesullivan2107
      @daphnesullivan2107 5 років тому +19

      @@ianhinkle2863 his very large fake hands have nothing to do with that. Uncle Jack's hand insecurity has been played out in a couple episodes. Like the one op said and when they talk about gun laws on tv with Frank. Its debatable if charlie was molested or not but it's got nothing to do with his hands

    • @ianhinkle2863
      @ianhinkle2863 5 років тому +3

      No totally agree but I also feel like it's just another thing in the show that's like hidden thing, and how he "touched Charlie " Wasn't saying you were wrong sir. Just wanted to share that, and kinda confirm. Been since I've watched the series

    • @daphnesullivan2107
      @daphnesullivan2107 5 років тому +10

      @@ianhinkle2863 yea but i just feel like they weren't too subtle about charlie being touched by uncle jack. Like the episode where he wants to move back into his mom's and he tells jack that family members dont wrestle and that he stayed awake all night . The hands likely have nothing to do w charlie being abused but that is something to think about haha :-)

    • @mujje
      @mujje 5 років тому +6

      Jack has probably touched charlie and other kids and think that its his hands that is the problem and not the act itself. Thats what i think the reason is. He says in one epi that his hands are ugly or something of that kind. But yeah i have "wrestled" with charlie when they shared room when he was a kid.

  • @CallUNexTuesday
    @CallUNexTuesday 5 років тому +197

    I *LOVED* this very serious looking man trying to make sense of the crazy that is It's Always Sunny. 😂

    • @AS-zc8mr
      @AS-zc8mr Рік тому +1

      is total nonsense

  • @9mmplantain323
    @9mmplantain323 5 років тому +358

    “Everybody keeps asking if I know anything about bird law”
    “I don’t have any idea what that is”
    Priceless!!!

  • @patrickhaley1312
    @patrickhaley1312 Рік тому +3

    "I don't think Charlie Kelly has passed the bar" Joke's on you he can't even read! I love this by the way.

  • @lpnp9477
    @lpnp9477 5 років тому +35

    My favourite part is how flabbergasted you are, like you're watching a real court proceeding play out and you're just like "oh no"

  • @larocagreyjoy7637
    @larocagreyjoy7637 5 років тому +301

    Im really offended this pseudo lawyer calls himself legal eagle, yet I couldn't find anybird law in his videos, except this classic example to wich he seemed to be completely unaware

    • @matthewk.5118
      @matthewk.5118 5 років тому

      Kathy I’m about 95% sure the first OP was being sarcastic.... On the topic of having time to watch movies, he probably has the weekends off, so he records raw footage of him viewing a couple movies/shows and has an editor do the editing. It’s ridiculous for you to think that he does everything on this channel, especially since you think his job is stressful.

  • @h.b.1247
    @h.b.1247 5 років тому +427

    OBJECTION!
    ....um.......i was under the impression you knew about bird law. Legal....EAGLE
    please change your name to LegalLandAnimal because from one law expert to another, you dont want to commit 15 U.S. Code § 54 - False advertisement
    Yeah.....didnt think so

    • @dustinsmith2021
      @dustinsmith2021 5 років тому +1

      Total buttlicker move from this guy.

    • @jeffc5974
      @jeffc5974 5 років тому +10

      Objection, you failed to start your post with "objection."

    • @213213yoyo
      @213213yoyo 5 років тому

      @JZPotter SUSTAINED

    • @lavamatstudios
      @lavamatstudios 5 років тому

      @@213213yoyo SUSTAINMENT OVERRULED

    • @WasteFaced
      @WasteFaced 5 років тому +5

      regular lawyers are always clueless in regard to bird law. it requires an extra two years of study and most are too lazy or stupid to finish it. charlie is a class act

  • @nakeempinnock4145
    @nakeempinnock4145 3 роки тому +19

    This episode deserves an A, cause while none of what they were doing was realistic or allowed, at the end of the episode the judge throws the case out because of what they were doing and how unrealistic that it was

  • @jivecjedkin
    @jivecjedkin 5 років тому +255

    I'll just regress because I feel like I've made myself perfectly redundant.

    • @nc0607
      @nc0607 5 років тому +14

      Leo Nards Bro ill take that advice into cooperation

    • @edawg0
      @edawg0 5 років тому +9

      "Yes ya have"

    • @corymerle8738
      @corymerle8738 5 років тому +3

      Looked for comment, found comment.

  • @MrKola-xt7tp
    @MrKola-xt7tp 5 років тому +152

    I question your credentials sir. I'm also doubting you have the adequate hand size to be a lawyer.

    • @bobbyb6053
      @bobbyb6053 5 років тому +4

      i'm sure this guy has no idea about bird law...

  • @Tetrodome
    @Tetrodome 5 років тому +188

    OBJECTION: As someone who seems to have nicely-sized hands, you would never appreciate the hardships endured by Jack Kelly and his tiny hands.

    • @twilightgardenspresentatio6384
      @twilightgardenspresentatio6384 5 років тому +5

      Tetrodome tiny hands? He has huge man hands- and I didn’t look when he said not to. I’m a good nephew

  • @MegaScytheman
    @MegaScytheman 5 років тому +509

    in bird court, the prosecution has the BIRDen of evidence

  • @somekid3893
    @somekid3893 4 роки тому +408

    I have no objection, but I do have a pretty interesting question for you:
    How would you write a law scene or drama that is so consistantly and specifically inaccurate that any lawyer could immediately tell that the author has an intimate understanding of court procedures?

    • @ablestarofficial8117
      @ablestarofficial8117 2 роки тому +1

      Study.

    • @mjolnirsoul9214
      @mjolnirsoul9214 2 роки тому +28

      the simpsons, Lionel Hutz

    • @matthewmcguire224
      @matthewmcguire224 2 роки тому +8

      This scene itself lol

    • @givepeaceachance940
      @givepeaceachance940 Рік тому +3

      Objection: it’s a logical fallacy to suggest that an unrealistic script implies the writers understand what is realistic in the first place. It could be simple ignorance. But I’ll admit if you assume they are intelligent writers they have some limited knowledge of court procedure. By no means can you assume they are experts or had expert help without evidence.
      Court is adjourned

    • @ArDeeMee
      @ArDeeMee Рік тому

      The judge doesn’t use a gavel, he uses a rubber ducky?

  • @David-bz7pi
    @David-bz7pi 5 років тому +153

    I legit laughed at the “what they got right” portion. Wood panels on the walls, lol

  • @TheActualJae
    @TheActualJae 4 роки тому +19

    Objection!! The judge, eventually, had the correct reaction to a completely invalid case and argument. Since the case was thrown out, it was, it seems to me, the only legal action that actually happened in this case. Ergo, all legal actions taken in this episode were done correctly, there were no errors in legal procedure and this episode should have gotten an A.

  • @MrBeastsHiddenWorld
    @MrBeastsHiddenWorld 5 років тому +63

    LegalEagle: "This is not normal at all."
    Always Sunny in summary.

  • @gypsylee333
    @gypsylee333 5 років тому +295

    Objection, bird law originated way before this episode, it started when they discuss if it's legal to own a hummingbird as a pet, and is brought up in many episodes, truly not a real fan

    • @williamblackfyre4866
      @williamblackfyre4866 5 років тому +11

      Hummingbirds are illegal tender.

    • @gypsylee333
      @gypsylee333 5 років тому +21

      @@williamblackfyre4866 I'm not saying I agree with it, but bird law in this country isn't governed by reason

    • @koi404
      @koi404 4 роки тому +3

      Well Duh. He doesn't watch the show

    • @nickamalfitano3613
      @nickamalfitano3613 3 роки тому

      Kitten mittens and D*ick towel was the first reference, I believe.

    • @craigstoner2632
      @craigstoner2632 3 роки тому

      @@gypsylee333 its like theyve winged it!

  • @hewhodrums
    @hewhodrums 5 років тому +171

    Reynolds vs. Reynolds: The Cereal Defense would've been a much better episode to review

    • @LegalEagle
      @LegalEagle  5 років тому +102

      It fares a lot better. Oh no, did I let the cat out of the bag?

    • @tianasweet8663
      @tianasweet8663 5 років тому +16

      @@LegalEagle Yaaaay! can't wait until you see it!! And cant wait to see your vid on it

    • @the_nikster1
      @the_nikster1 5 років тому +5

      omg yes! do that one next please :)

    • @Eightsixseven23224
      @Eightsixseven23224 5 років тому +6

      @@LegalEagle well I don't know why you would put Maureen in a bag?

    • @JohnEOtherSide
      @JohnEOtherSide 5 років тому +1

      I was thinking the whos gotta do the dishes episode. Not a court room exactly, but it is funny as hell.

  • @jasonbell4226
    @jasonbell4226 3 роки тому +37

    As a law enforcement official who is in court frequently and with Sunny being my favorite show of all time, I am saddened that I just discovered this channel. Good work council! And bird law is real 😊

  • @Neopopulist
    @Neopopulist 5 років тому +561

    I wouldn't trust someone who doesn't know shit about bird law, this guy isn't very well versed I'd have to say. Doesn't even understand why he has fake hands... Get a load of this guy!

    • @Abde47
      @Abde47 5 років тому +39

      How dare you question Uncle Jack's big masculine hands?
      His hands tell a story of greatness. If you take a look at his right hand...

    • @frankzhang7529
      @frankzhang7529 5 років тому +19

      NOBODY LOOK! NOBODY LOOK!

    • @ucanquoteme7404
      @ucanquoteme7404 5 років тому +11

      I don't know where you see fake hands. All I see are big, masculine hands. Hands that tell a story of greatness. Hands that are perfect for wrestling with nephews.

    • @Somerandomperson-hl1kt
      @Somerandomperson-hl1kt 5 років тому

      ThirdWorldEuroTrash is this a hate comment? Then I say this: >:(

    • @rockoutwithyourckout
      @rockoutwithyourckout 5 років тому +2

      🤝💰 📷✋✋🏻 “We’re lawyers!” 🤚🏻🤚📸

  • @dirtystockcardriver
    @dirtystockcardriver 5 років тому +461

    Let's say you and I go toe to toe in bird law and see who comes out the victor....

    • @aaronmontane7224
      @aaronmontane7224 5 років тому +3

      TylerR_41 I don’t think you and me will do anything of that sort.

    • @John-lw7bz
      @John-lw7bz 5 років тому +5

      Just wondering is A-a-ron wrong for using "me" in that sentence instead of "I"

    • @kiddN4TURAL
      @kiddN4TURAL 5 років тому +3

      Yes. He should have used I. Here's an easy way to tell whether "I" or "me" is correct in a sentence - remove the other party. In this case that would leave "I don't think me will do anything of the sort" which, unless you are a cartoon caveman, is not something you would ever say. You WOULD, however, say that "I don't think I will do anything of the sort, hence "I" is correct.

    • @DJWarwing
      @DJWarwing 5 років тому +5

      Ok well...
      filibuster

    • @rerecycled7507
      @rerecycled7507 5 років тому +1

      @@John-lw7bz I could ask you that very same question.

  • @fuzzwuzz6541
    @fuzzwuzz6541 5 років тому +384

    This tiny hand lawyer cannot be trusted..

    • @rogergoza3180
      @rogergoza3180 5 років тому +5

      fuzz Wuzz a sensible man I see

    • @emonoglesby
      @emonoglesby 5 років тому

      Nice one

    • @ToshJury
      @ToshJury 5 років тому +1

      He has big hands, can you not see his big, real hands?

    • @emonoglesby
      @emonoglesby 5 років тому

      @EmmaBean yeah crazies party is my uncle's name is Jack Kelly and my name is Charles aka charlie

    • @fuzzwuzz6541
      @fuzzwuzz6541 5 років тому

      Tosh Jury it’s an inside joke from sunny in Philadelphia

  • @digitalphoenix72
    @digitalphoenix72 6 місяців тому +2

    Im positive that "bird law" actually began at an episode in season 3 or 4... this episode is just when they took the "bird law" into a full episode of him in court trying to it. But he had been claiming to be an expert in bird law for years at this point😂