@@adamsamuel8593 Even Pandya and Afridi were entertaining and more entertaining than Lara for sure. The biggest was Sehwag. But none had the perfection and artistery which Sachin had. He mastered the bat lightyears ahead of anyone else.
Sometimes I feel Naseer Hussain , Ramiz Raza and Harsha Bhogke are the only cricket observers and commentators who speak the truth no matter what. They dont 'seduce' to any player even if the player is getting the more runs than anyother player of the time. Then we have likes of Shastri , Manjrekar , Kapil Dev , Mark from Australia who appease and try to get personal admiration or liking from the cricketrs and dont do their jobs honestly.
No doubt Sachin was talented player, but he played for himself than the team, like many other in Indian team then. And we fools prayed for his century than a win for the team.
Test cricket is real cricket. If we keep Sir Don out of the context, then Sir Garfield sobers , Sunil Gavskar and LARA are the best batsmen in the Test. The innings these guys played against quality bowling attack and under pressure which Sachin never played. Sachin never played under pressure. Sachin never win matches in Test. His second inning run chase Avg is very very poor which shows he is not mentally tough and Gutsy player like Gavaskar, LARA, Steve Waugh and other Gr8s. No one (great cricketers) have said sachin is all time Gr8 except Few Indian cricketer of Sachin's friends and Team mates. All Gr8s have put Lara above sachin becz the innings Lara played in Test cricket which sachin never played . Sachin can only dream about it. We INDIAN People are just spectator and do not have cricketing knowledge. We just see country cricket and dont follow world cricket. We do not know what happened in the past who played... how they played. Against which bowling attack. We hv zero knowledge of cricket. have anyone seen Sir Garfield sobers batting ( I mean on You tube) ? How he is batting? How he scored runs? His shots? He is natural like Lara. Do you people know he has scored 365 runs ? Hit 6 sixes in an over. have anyone seen Gavaskar 221 innings at oval 1979 chasing 437 in fourth innings? The match end up with draw with 2 wickets remaining. Sunil Gavaskar was 8th wicket and only few overs remaining to close the fifth day, Do you know he made 14 centaury against west indies killer fast bowling attack MARSHAL HOLDING ROBERS GARNER? Except Sunil Gavaskar No one stood in front of them in that era . Hope we spectator know these west indies bowlers.. have anyone seen Lara's match winnings 153 against Australia (Mcgrath, Gillespi, Shane Warn) in 4th innings? from 91 for 5 wickets, he did 200 runs partnership wit last 5 players and win the match with one wicket remaining ( Hats off to Walsh for playing 4 balls of Gillespi and gave Lara a chance). One can only dream such a innings. There are many such innings these guys hv played in TEST. All I cannot put here. Go and search on you tube. Go and see them first then I am sure u people will think differently with cricketing mind and not by heart. Show me sachin's a single innings (like these guys played )where he played and win test match in 2nd innings run chase except one against Pakistan 139 which he got out playing a stupid shot when only 15 runs required and 4 wickets in hand. Now Don't say his back was paining. No excuse please. Scoring 100 or 1000 century is not imp but how you scored, in which situation u scored that is imp. Wisden cricket hv not considered his single century out of 100 in their top list. Sachin completely failed. Thanks god Lara played in the same era in which sachin played so we came to know the huge gap between the gr8 lara and sachin. Sachin is light year behind lara. LARA u r GENIUS. Many Many love to the Gr8 LARA from India.
I respect Nasser deeply for hsi knowledge, talent and forthrightness, but I disagree with his opinion that Sachin is the greatest batsman to have played the game. That accolade has rested solely with Sir Donald George Bradman ever since he made his debut in first class cricket, in the 1920's. Until a batsman shows the kind of consistency that fetches 29 Test hundreds in 80 innings, there will be no challenger. BTW I am Indian and a year elder to Sachin.
You are an Indian and the fact that you cant digest that Sachin is the greatest batsman of all times is understandable cuz Indians really dont know if how to respect their heroes as Ian Chappel would say and i agree with him. Records and Consistency are mere biproducts of several factors like conditions , rules of the game of the time , Quality of bowlers of the time and several more that a batsman faces. The only true Parameter to judge the greatness of any batsman is the command he has over his bat , ability to play shots at will level of skill and talent and no doubt Sachin was lightyears ahead of anyone in all these.
@@applesupport3331 Nasser Hussain is also Indian so we could argue that he is partisan, as most of the Indian diaspora is. That aside, anybody is entitled to pass informed judgement. And if anybody who is acquainted with Bradman's stats still considers somebody else better, then they simply have a personal axe to grind. As for your childish argument " rules of the game of the time , Quality of bowlers of the time and several more", then every batsman, including the great Sutcliffe, Hammond and Hutton would also have averaged 100 or thereabouts. The fact is, only one batsman ever did and that was Bradman. That is why he remains pre-eminent.
@@tryarunm "A personal axe to grind" yes , tell that to Hanif Mohammad - The first Little Master of Cricketing world who said and I quote " I have watched both Bradman and Sachin play , to me Sachin is way ahead of Sir Don in batsmanship" . Also he was a Pakistani and not someone from Indian Daispora somewhere abroad. Dont get blinded by stats. Sachin's stats are noway reflecting his skills and abilities. They are quite "poor" considering the amount of command he has on the cricketing bat. Even Today's pakistani player Azhar Ali has got a Triple Century which many legends of the game havent. Stats can never give the complete info about the greatness of a player.
@@applesupport3331 You are just argumentative, arent you? Illogical and unreasonable. You wouldnt make sense even to a mental case. Are you Indian, Support?
Nasser, what is the matter with you? Tomorrow you will say that Ashwin bowls faster than Dale Steyn. Get a grip on yourself, son. There are millions of gullible fools out there who worship you. And for God's sake do not taint the legacy of SIR Donald Bradman by comparing him to some Maharashtrian Bombay batsman who would rather see his team lose than give away his own wicket in that very team's cause.
😂😂😂😂sir Don Bradman you kiddin' me...bitch???.Do you know the ball speed at which Bradman played those days😂😂😂kids nowadays would clear the boundary easily,if they had some one to bowl to them at that lowwwww medium pace.
Nassar always gives honest feedback for all players. Great admiration for Sachin.
biggest name in cricket now and ever....
One of the most brilliant commentator and England's best captain for me. Amazing spokesperson and wonderful to hear
Naseer has described Sachin as the best. He can play both attacking and defensive game
What a perfect little interview. Nasser was perfect
One of the most intelligent captain
Ankit vij england can win tournaments with current team
Sachin is the best playest ever..!!
Brian Lara was more entertaining. Even Kohli more entertaining.
@@adamsamuel8593 Even Pandya and Afridi were entertaining and more entertaining than Lara for sure. The biggest was Sehwag. But none had the perfection and artistery which Sachin had. He mastered the bat lightyears ahead of anyone else.
@@applesupport3331 they cant see class, may be they never experience it
Sometimes I feel Naseer Hussain , Ramiz Raza and Harsha Bhogke are the only cricket observers and commentators who speak the truth no matter what. They dont 'seduce' to any player even if the player is getting the more runs than anyother player of the time. Then we have likes of Shastri , Manjrekar , Kapil Dev , Mark from Australia who appease and try to get personal admiration or liking from the cricketrs and dont do their jobs honestly.
Nasir so great praises another great.
Very first! Sachine is great good hearted person!
Himler Sphere true
Naseer , a true gentleman
Oh My God !!!
thanks sir few good words to god
Well done, Vladimir.
100....100s man...getting a hundred in International game is one thing and getting 100 100s is another...
Sachin was lucky to play the greatest bowlers, wasim, waqar, akhrar, mc grath, mcdonald, pollack, ambrose, walsh, anderson, broad
But I feel vice Versa..
They were lucky to have played against Sachin 🔥
nazeer speaks so highly abt sachin. both are great.
Lovely comments. The genuine admiration shows through, sans the gushing adulation.
Great nasser.
Honest comment Naseer
I think sachin would have played white ball,red ball pink yellow orange green blue black ball every color with same dominance
No doubt Sachin was talented player, but he played for himself than the team, like many other in Indian team then. And we fools prayed for his century than a win for the team.
Nasser and Athers -- the greatest since Mr. Benaud and Mr. Greig
Vladimir Putin :'D
Future Freak I thought same and opened.
Hehehe-spot on.
😂😂😂
Nasser is a gem
For a second I thought, Why is Putin talking about Sachin!!
putin did his homework....specially after Sharapova incident :P
😅
very good commentator and great analysist.
Wonderful...
nasser hussain was born in chennai,india
Just for a second.. I thought Putin praising Sachin 😅
Test cricket is real cricket. If we keep Sir Don out of the context, then Sir Garfield sobers , Sunil Gavskar and LARA are the best batsmen in the Test. The innings these guys played against quality bowling attack and under pressure which Sachin never played. Sachin never played under pressure. Sachin never win matches in Test. His second inning run chase Avg is very very poor which shows he is not mentally tough and Gutsy player like Gavaskar, LARA, Steve Waugh and other Gr8s.
No one (great cricketers) have said sachin is all time Gr8 except Few Indian cricketer of Sachin's friends and Team mates. All Gr8s have put Lara above sachin becz the innings Lara played in Test cricket which sachin never played . Sachin can only dream about it. We INDIAN People are just spectator and do not have cricketing knowledge. We just see country cricket and dont follow world cricket. We do not know what happened in the past who played... how they played. Against which bowling attack. We hv zero knowledge of cricket.
have anyone seen Sir Garfield sobers batting ( I mean on You tube) ? How he is batting? How he scored runs? His shots? He is natural like Lara. Do you people know he has scored 365 runs ? Hit 6 sixes in an over.
have anyone seen Gavaskar 221 innings at oval 1979 chasing 437 in fourth innings? The match end up with draw with 2 wickets remaining. Sunil Gavaskar was 8th wicket and only few overs remaining to close the fifth day, Do you know he made 14 centaury against west indies killer fast bowling attack MARSHAL HOLDING ROBERS GARNER? Except Sunil Gavaskar No one stood in front of them in that era . Hope we spectator know these west indies bowlers..
have anyone seen Lara's match winnings 153 against Australia (Mcgrath, Gillespi, Shane Warn) in 4th innings? from 91 for 5 wickets, he did 200 runs partnership wit last 5 players and win the match with one wicket remaining ( Hats off to Walsh for playing 4 balls of Gillespi and gave Lara a chance). One can only dream such a innings.
There are many such innings these guys hv played in TEST. All I cannot put here. Go and search on you tube.
Go and see them first then I am sure u people will think differently with cricketing mind and not by heart.
Show me sachin's a single innings (like these guys played )where he played and win test match in 2nd innings run chase except one against Pakistan 139 which he got out playing a stupid shot when only 15 runs required and 4 wickets in hand. Now Don't say his back was paining. No excuse please.
Scoring 100 or 1000 century is not imp but how you scored, in which situation u scored that is imp.
Wisden cricket hv not considered his single century out of 100 in their top list. Sachin completely failed.
Thanks god Lara played in the same era in which sachin played so we came to know the huge gap between the gr8 lara and sachin.
Sachin is light year behind lara.
LARA u r GENIUS.
Many Many love to the Gr8 LARA from India.
Nasir you beauty in com box
I respect Nasser deeply for hsi knowledge, talent and forthrightness, but I disagree with his opinion that Sachin is the greatest batsman to have played the game. That accolade has rested solely with Sir Donald George Bradman ever since he made his debut in first class cricket, in the 1920's. Until a batsman shows the kind of consistency that fetches 29 Test hundreds in 80 innings, there will be no challenger. BTW I am Indian and a year elder to Sachin.
Bradman is overrated. Sobers Richards Lara Sachin All Better.
You are an Indian and the fact that you cant digest that Sachin is the greatest batsman of all times is understandable cuz Indians really dont know if how to respect their heroes as Ian Chappel would say and i agree with him. Records and Consistency are mere biproducts of several factors like conditions , rules of the game of the time , Quality of bowlers of the time and several more that a batsman faces. The only true Parameter to judge the greatness of any batsman is the command he has over his bat , ability to play shots at will level of skill and talent and no doubt Sachin was lightyears ahead of anyone in all these.
@@applesupport3331 Nasser Hussain is also Indian so we could argue that he is partisan, as most of the Indian diaspora is. That aside, anybody is entitled to pass informed judgement. And if anybody who is acquainted with Bradman's stats still considers somebody else better, then they simply have a personal axe to grind.
As for your childish argument " rules of the game of the time , Quality of bowlers of the time and several more", then every batsman, including the great Sutcliffe, Hammond and Hutton would also have averaged 100 or thereabouts. The fact is, only one batsman ever did and that was Bradman. That is why he remains pre-eminent.
@@tryarunm "A personal axe to grind" yes , tell that to Hanif Mohammad - The first Little Master of Cricketing world who said and I quote " I have watched both Bradman and Sachin play , to me Sachin is way ahead of Sir Don in batsmanship" . Also he was a Pakistani and not someone from Indian Daispora somewhere abroad. Dont get blinded by stats. Sachin's stats are noway reflecting his skills and abilities. They are quite "poor" considering the amount of command he has on the cricketing bat. Even Today's pakistani player Azhar Ali has got a Triple Century which many legends of the game havent. Stats can never give the complete info about the greatness of a player.
@@applesupport3331 You are just argumentative, arent you? Illogical and unreasonable. You wouldnt make sense even to a mental case. Are you Indian, Support?
I thought it was putin😂
Nasser, what is the matter with you? Tomorrow you will say that Ashwin bowls faster than Dale Steyn. Get a grip on yourself, son. There are millions of gullible fools out there who worship you. And for God's sake do not taint the legacy of SIR Donald Bradman by comparing him to some Maharashtrian Bombay batsman who would rather see his team lose than give away his own wicket in that very team's cause.
'Playing It My Way' that could be the motto of every Bombay batsman from Vijay Merchant on. All they play for is themselves.
My dear he is better than Bradman as well.bradman never faced world class bowler
😂😂😂😂sir Don Bradman you kiddin' me...bitch???.Do you know the ball speed at which Bradman played those days😂😂😂kids nowadays would clear the boundary easily,if they had some one to bowl to them at that lowwwww medium pace.
I know broad n Anderson go long way u see he goes