According to materialism there is no such thing as an "restless heart", but on the other hand, according to them, there are also no limits imposed by any Natural Order, because the human being is his own creation, so any limit is artificial. Wouldn't the latter automatically imply an infinite quest to satiate and calm the human heart (i.e. no limit is satisfactory, as they are all artificial)? and wouldn't that be implying a "restless heart"?. But a "restless heart" without any hope, since if at least there were a Natural Order imposed by God, it implies that we are able to develop ourselves until we can fulfill that order, something that is finally achieved in the Heaven, with God .. So, there are only two alternatives: 1. Materialism -> "restless heart" ad infinitum 2. God/logos -> temporary "restless heart" (only the pilgrimage on Earth) ..
This idea of separate rationalities has many echoes today with modern intersectional theory
The idea of the "failed revolution" is similar to some ideas regarding the emergence of the early church in Christianity and Caliphate in Islam
How is that? can you please elaborate or provide some references to read about it?
According to materialism there is no such thing as an "restless heart", but on the other hand, according to them, there are also no limits imposed by any Natural Order, because the human being is his own creation, so any limit is artificial. Wouldn't the latter automatically imply an infinite quest to satiate and calm the human heart (i.e. no limit is satisfactory, as they are all artificial)? and wouldn't that be implying a "restless heart"?. But a "restless heart" without any hope, since if at least there were a Natural Order imposed by God, it implies that we are able to develop ourselves until we can fulfill that order, something that is finally achieved in the Heaven, with God ..
So, there are only two alternatives:
1. Materialism -> "restless heart" ad infinitum
2. God/logos -> temporary "restless heart" (only the pilgrimage on Earth) ..
The middle way often seems to be the answer, not an extreme position or alternative.
Materialism leads to individuality and relativism?