Global warming is exactly what Rogan said it wasn't, propaganda for profit of certain private interests. The science for manmade global warming is not there AT ALL There is no historical correlation between co2 levels and climate in Earth's 550M+ years of life giving climate history. Co2 has been over 1,000% higher than now for millions of years and no "runaway warming," It has been triple what it is now and we have had glaciation and ice ages, Did the laws of physics suddenly change or was there suddenly an agenda to build a centralised technocracy run by the elite that rules by diktats such as Net Zero? If you ask a climate scientist why there was no runaway warming when Co2 was massively higher than now they say because solar radiation was lower, inadvertently admitting that the Sun drives climate not Co2 levels. Imagine that, the huge ball of fire in the sky that provides all our heat is responsible for warmer and cooler cycles and not a cow farting, crazy! As for Net Zero, just do the maths and it is a blatant scam. In the UK our puppet Gov is forging ahead with the globalist agenda, UN Replacement Migration and UN Agenda 2030 as dictated by Davos and the WEF. Reaching Net Zero in the UK at catastrophic cost to our standard of living and national security will reduce Co2 by 1 part in 1 million at best! Atmospheric Co2 0.04% UK global Co2 less than 1% = 0.0001% of atmosphere! Meanwhile China, who the people who tell us we must give up everything in the West to save the planet left exempt from carbon taxes etc, produce more Co2 than the whole of US and Europe combined! Better still they invested heavily in the Chinese economy once that unlevel economic playing field had been achieved (China producing heap good with cheap energy The Western industry crippled) and moved their factories from Europe and the US to China which had China build thousands more dirty coal plants to keep u with demand! So while I follow the science, the Global warming brigade follow the money. It is funny Rogan got called a right wing conspiracy nut for daring to question these false paradigms by his own lefty serpents, I think helped wake him up and start applying more critical thinking instead of regurgitating establishment propaganda.
Climate is everchanging and humans are the dominant species on Earth, of course they have an effect on their environment so the expression "Climate change" is true if taken in the literal sense of the word... humans are not however these demigods they like themselves to think of as to be masters of the Earth... the bullshit is just propaganda for the 5 federal environmental agencies and hundreds of state agencies that have budgets in the billions of dollars every year and who get a lot of lobbyists money too... at this point they're just bloodsucking leeches on the government...
@@PolitikPolitik-fh2qc You haven't watched this video, right? Joe said it, climate change is not a matter of OPINION, it's a matter of data, facts and science. And yes, since he is living in Texas and elites like Trump and Musk are part of his circle, he changed some of his opinions, but I dare you to show me where he denies the man made climate change. Because he doesn't. He changed his tune about the question if there is a clima change without humans, but he never denied the impact of human energy production on the planet and his environment.
Joe is the goat of interviewers imo. he doesn't give a fuck about any BS, and makes it clear, left or right when he doesn't agree or let shit go without challenge.
I will be quick to say that “I don’t know. I’m not a scientist”. Climate is always changing. The argument is weather or not humans have caused the temperature rise. My opinion is that there is no way for us to know how much damage we have caused, but all this argument does is establish blame. Instead without blame I try to do as little damage to the environment as possible. Including, trying to minimize the amount of new stuff that I purchase. Buy quality things that will last my lifetime and more. Try and certainly not succeed but try to not buy items that are manufactured in a bad acting, polluting country. I drive well maintained used vehicles because a new car has a massive carbon footprint before it even leaves the dealership. I believe the answer is everyone taking accountability and not some people telling others how to live. And yes, Joe has had climate scientists on and is closer to Candace’s opinion now.
When I was in elementary school we were told that the planet was cooling and there was a coming ice age. Then the great environmental concern was acid rain, and we were told about this hole in the ozone layer that was going to cause the planet to warm. Now we no longer say the planet is cooling, I haven't heard acid rain mentioned in decades and the hole in the ozone layer is almost gone. Forgive me for not spending a fortune on an electric car, investing in windmills, and wanting to suffer rolling blackouts in the summer like our friends in California because they are relying on "green energy". You can argue that the planet is warming, but how much of that is caused by man, and how much of an affect are the proposed environmental standards going to have. Sorry, I'm not willing to go broke and give up on the internal combustion engine to save the planet.
They thought the planet would cool because of excessive smog reflecting sunlight, so we reduced smog and that problem went away. Acid rain was a problem, and so we further reduced chemicals we spew into the atmosphere, and the problem of acid rain went away. The hole in the ozone layer is healing because we banned air conditioning coolants that destroy ozone and required innovation in less harmful ones. Now, the atmosphere is retaining heat because of excessive carbon and methane, and that's making climates shift hotter and creating more chaotic weather patterns. You forgot about asbestos (caused tons of COPD and lung cancer), lead paint (caused tons of brain damage), and leaded gasoline exhaust (caused high rates of violent crime, especially in urban areas with more gasoline vehicles). We banned those, and now things are better. But now, somehow trapping carbon and curbing methane is a bridge too far. Those dirty libs who were right about all that other stuff are suddenly somehow wrong about contemporary global climate change. You're a regular Don Quixote, my dude. Only a donkey like yourself calls a wind turbine a "windmill".
Technically we've already been through two maybe three so called apocalypses and we're still very much still here and the damn world isn't on fire. The only actual real concern as far as anything close to a "apocalypses" is if yellowstone erupts. That fucker goes off it will actually cover the world. doubt it'll kill off the human race but it'll make global warming a complete after thought.
@@ricksundberg5659 They seem to have switched after the Soviet Venus landings. They felt that global warming went crazy and heated the planet to 900 degrees and feared the same thing might happen on Earth.
The issue of acid rain was largely due to the sulphides being ejected into the from manufacturing and coal power plants. Regulations and new technology was put into place to reduce the emissions which helped stop the issue of acid rain. The issue with ozone layer was the release of chlorofluorocarbons being released into the air through refrigerants and aerosols. Regulations and technology was put into place to reduce emissions and aerosol use and the spread of the hole in the ozone layer was eventually slowed, then stopped and is now in the process of regenerating itself. Through cores done on glaciers, ice packs at the poles, lake beds and even tree growth, they’ve proven that the average annual temperature is rising at a higher rate than other cyclical periods of the current ice age we are in since the start of the Industrial Revolution where we started to see an increase in the pollutants being put into the environment and the exponential increase in the human population. This increase in average annual temperature effects the interactions of the ocean and atmosphere which results in greater extremes and frequencies of weather events that we are currently seeing.
exactly. Joe was calling his bluff. no pissing contest. Not sure ive ever seen Joe engage in one of those unless its with real friends whos he's engaging in comedic banter with.
The guy was like a snake..A weak snake at that!!...He didn't offer up anything similar but JR should offer up his program??.And its something worthwhile at that! What a troll!
As a child of the 60’s since the early 70’s environmentalist have been telling us the world is coming to an end every couple of years. Guess what? I’am still here.
It's like most topics out into the political spectrum, and the best way to hide a lie. You bury it in observable truth. Is it changing ? Yes, obviously. Are we causing it ? No. We are affecting weather patterns by changing where the emissions occur. Move it from here to China, it immediately affects their weather. Causing a chain reaction. Change one, it causes the others to change as well. Can we fix it ? No. If we could, solar and windmills, would be the last choice for alternative energy sources.
Well we can see it is getting warmer, we changed a lot to close the ozon, many species of animals have gone extinct and many or following. Nobody told you that there would be a day that suddenly life is over. It's a slow process. The average human seems to be only capable of thinking in extremes...
@ California environmentalist killed of more wildlife and polluted the air more in the last two weeks due their policies. So maybe it time to take a step back and rethink a few things
I remember the government lying to us. When I was a child in the 70s saying we would be out of oil in 10. It was Florida will be gone in 10 years. But here it is 2025 Florida still here and we've had plenty of oil.
Weather has not changed drastically since you were a kid. There are not anymore tornadoes in 2024 then there were in 1960. There are not anymore hurricanes in 2024 then there were in 1970. In the 1960's the technology to predict and track tornados and hurricanes was not as advanced as the doppler weather radar of 2024. So we are able to track more of these weather events in 2024 then we could in the 50;s 60's and 70's. Giving the appearance of increases in weather anomalies.
Nah, I'm with Joe on the "week of programming" The guy was taking piss thinking that he could match those stakes. Sometimes people do need a reality check.
Please react to Guy Sebastian- no reason to stay ( the voice performance) he is an Australian artist and this performance is out of this world, he sings with so much emotion and passion. You could feel everything that he’s singing about.
she literally stating how she've seen it changed drastically just in here life time. And her sentiment isn't the only one. I grew up CT my whole life and i can see these changes as well
The Steven Crowder argument was oberblown on how heated it was. It was ony about 10 minutes while the interview was nearly 4 hours long. They easily moved onto a different topic and got calm throughout the rest of the episode. Joe Rogan also went onto Steven's show afterwards.
Britt. We are still technically in an ice age. The world is going to get way colder before it gets warm enough to worry about. The reason we dont have winters like we used to is because the north and south poles are consistently changing. Also if global warming is real then how have states in the south of the US starting to get freezing weather. 🥶
Climate change catastrophists are no different than a disheveled man holding a sign on the street corner that says: "The end is Nigh". The climate is changing, has changed, and will forever change in periods longer than a lifetime - people all have examples of climate change because of this fact. But what we do is forget from generation to generation... and those who stand to gain from this, do. The changing climate is something we can adapt to if only we were truthful about it.
Regarding climate change: 1) if coastal cities are at risk, why are beach houses so expensive and sort after? Wouldn't they be worthless in a few years? 2) we are coming out of a 12k year ice age cycle, meaning the climate is warming. 3) there seem to be massive natural methane deposits that have recently started to leak and methane is apparently worse than co2 for warning, so yikes. 4) people in power who push this hard, their private life seems to not care how much their private plane produces, amongst other things.
What is your point though. Because these 4 things you said kind of conflict with each other. Beach houses are expensive because people value living close to the beach. That's a simple answer. And clearly people don't take climate change seriously, believe in it and neither do we know when the sea level will rise. It's not a simple calculation. Yes the ice age cycle, but that is less accurate information than simply having statistics of average temperature in the passed years. And yes people in their private life don't always match their public stance. But whether they do or do not match, it does not change the fact whether climate change is real or not.
What? Your post doesn't make much sense. I mean, if you can't understand why beach houses are so expensive when there's a risk that they'll be part of the ocean in the near future, I highly doubt you have the mental capacity to even begin to understand the subject, which your questions prove, by the way. You're missing a lot of basic knowledge and the intelligence to process this information.
If evidence that reinforces or validates your argument exist, you should indeed present it. That's a good thing. The only people not on board with that are the people who love to argue for the sake of arguing.
On Christmas eve in 1977 in the southern tier of NY, we had a snowstorm so heavy that minimum measurements were 3 feet, just over night! As a child through the 70, a teen through the early to mid 80s, Christmas was always a very snowy holiday. Through the winter we'd get negative temperatures that kept rivers and dams thickly frozen over for months, and we didn't see grass until April. On Christmas day in 1994, I stepped outside to a 64-ish degree day, very green grass, and not a snowflake in sight. Since then, we've had way warmer winters, and in the last three years, we've barely had any snow at all. Strangely, on May 8th & 9th in 2020, we had snow blizzards strong enough to create whiteout visibility. Just one week before this we had clear sunny skies and 75 degrees. And one week after this strange snowy event we had very clear and sunny skies and 80sum degrees. Why the drastic change in weather or climate here in the Southern Tier? And what does this mean for future generations? Who best to answer this question? Climate Scientists or politicians who are very much not Climate Scientists? And what does a Climate Scientist have to gain in lying about the results of their studies? What does a politician have to gain about lying to their constituents? I'm more likely to believe a scientist over a politician regarding something like this.
Who pays the "Climate scientists"? Who funds their organizations? Who has international programs manipulating weather across whole regions of the planet? How far are the poles shifting each year? How much has solar activity increased the last decade? What brought us into the inter-glacial period and out of the last ice age 13,000 years ago? Those are the questions you should look into.
@@NickJayy212 So, ignore all the lies and deceptions from politicians just to satisfy your narrative. Gotcha. There's no point in looking at this holistically because what good could come of that.
In the billions of years of history of the earth, there have been numerous "ice ages" and with each ice age, there is a "warm-out" from said ice age...some scientists believe we're still warming out from the last ice age 25000 yrs ago and it might continue to warm for hundreds if not thousands of years to come.
We're currently in what's called an interglacial period, named the Holocene epoch, a more moderate temperature section of the current ice age, which is known as the Quaternary Period (which also includes the Pleistocene epoch). The fact that we still have polar ice caps proves we're still in an ice age.
It comes down to this: 1. Rich man or poor? - the answer is rich 2. Athletic man or a grub? - the answer is athletic 3. Athletic rich man or athletic poor man? - the answer is athletic rich I rest my case.
He literally says not to judge in Matt. 7:1. However, that doesn't mean we can't identify someone who is doing something wrong but we would be more like a witness.
Here's my take on the climate thing: the data clearly shows that the climate changes over time. I had a good conversation with my physics professor who was doing climate modeling for his phd, and his take was that there is so much data, that's about as clear as you're going to get on climate consensus. How much the WEATHER (big difference here that ill get into) is changing due to human activity is too complex of a question to answer, just like exactly how much impact one person has on the economy as a whole; and due to this, its generally a bad idea to advocate for governments to push for a complete overhaul of the entire economy in unrealistic time frames with no alternative fuel source and infrastructure in place to facilitate that change. We aren't gonna legislate our way out of climate change and its a fools game to try. Does that mean we should neglect the environment and not be responsible caretakers of our home? Absolutely not, but we do need to have a much more clear idea of the problem before we attempt to fix it, lest we mess it up worse, and if there's one thing the government is good at, its creating a problem where there is none in order to give itself more power to deal with that problem, and any power utilized by the government carries an implicit threat of force. Comply, or else. Ultimately, governments are awful at preventing humanitarian problems, and more often than not is the cause behind them. What we, as a society, and as one of the most powerful logistic enterprises ever created as a nation, ARE good at is overcoming mother nature. Sure natural disasters happen, and sea levels are rising and that will cost money, work, and lives to overcome, but coastal damage isn't an insurmountable problem and there's a big difference between climate change and weather pattern differences over small periods of time (climate models generally take thousands to millions of years, versus weather patterns changing over periods of dozens to hundreds of years), and the fact that the average American can't tell the difference is both a failure of the education system, as well as something politicians, green energy corporations, and big tech capitalize on to enrich and empower themselves. Another important point is that even if we did try to fix it through heavy handed government enforcement, what about the rest of the world? China and India aren't going to invest the untold trillions of dollars it would take to completely overhaul their infrastructure to a "more green" energy source, and they'd certain love to see us shoot ourselves in the foot trying to do so, because, hey, more cheap fuel for them right? Good luck on getting the whole of humanity to get on board with fixing the planet, most of us can't even keep our house in order, much less our local community. There's bigger fish to fry, and climate change should be much lower on the list of things we needs to address as a society than it is. I could go on and on on this topic, it's on of those things where it's too complex to boil down to a simple question of "Do you believe in climate change?", because the question is so vague, any answer given is necessarily vague and doesn't encompass all of the things that the climate affects. Sorry brit, I spent so long typing, I skimmed through the rest of the video. I've seen most of those conversations and half of them are either morons or grifters, and the other half were conversations that could have gone a lot better. Not interested in flat earth, skip, not interested in nutritionists taking jabs at each other skip, saw the conversation with Matt Walsh, and I think there's something to be said for his stance on gay marriage violating the sanctity of marriage, mainly that he's entitled to his opinion as a Christian, but again its kind of a terrible gotcha question where if you so much as insinuate something anti-gay, you're a bigot and aren't worth listening to. I can simultaneously think that homosexuality is a sin in the Christian tradition, and think that it should absolutely be allowed in a government that professes to value Religious freedom. I have a sibling who has had difficulty with identifying their sexuality, and it doesn't make one bit of difference to me who they choose to love, so long as that love is expressed healthily and is reciprocated in kind. The anti -pot argument was a fail on both parties part, with Crowder continually professing to not know enough to have an opinion, and joe continually misinterpreting his not wanting to debate the issue as flat out, "you're wrong, it should be banned" disagreement. Skip. Milo eventually had a huge change of heart with regards to Christianity as well has his own homosexuality some time after this, from what I remember, but I don't follow him closely enough to say more, and some of his takes are pretty out there. A lot of these guests a just rage bait. Skip. Paul Stamets (not sure if i spelled that right) is an interesting character, but I gotta take anything someone who regularly ingests hallucinogens' with a grain of salt. If remember correctly he was the one that came up with the stoned ape theory, and if it understand it correctly, I think it might have some merit, but what do I know? The Tyson one could have been handled better. I think I understand why Tyson was trying to say; He's question the nature of the prevalence of sadism in warriors culture, and it's a topic worth exploring, I just think that Joe isn't the person to ask on this because Joe doesn't experience sadistic pleasure in conquering his opponents, or at least, hasn't for a long time (although he has mentioned that you have to have a ruthless, "I'm going to take your head off" mindset when he was fighting professionally.) He trains as a matter of discipline and self defense, not as a way to exorcise his demons. Jordan Peterson has some good lectures on the topic in his Personality and it's Transformations Lectures from his University teaching days, and I highly encourage checking those out; they were really eye opening to me and a fascinating insight into psychology. Wow I didn't mean to write that much.
Portnoy is the founder of Barstool Sports. Barstool Sports is an American blog website and digital media company headquartered in New York City that publishes sports journalism and pop culture-related content.
REgarding climate change, there's a few factors that are largely ignored. One is that the Sun undergoes several cycles that affect the Earth's temperature. IIRC, the shortest is 11 years, and the longest is over 2000. If all or several of those are at peak at the same time, we're definitely going to feel it. Another is that in Dec. 2021-Jan. 2022, an underwater volcano near Tonga erupted for almost a whole month. Continuously spewing water heated to several thousand degrees into the atmosphere, into the jet stream, screwing up the pattern of that jet stream as it spread the steam around the planet. Then, at the end, it exploded with enough force to punch right through the jet stream, through the atmosphere, and into space. This will affect the climate of the whole globe until at least 2038. Last point, they keep harping on the ice caps melting. Those have been melting for 14,000 years already. The polar ice cap used to reach all the way to the Canada-US border. There was no Arctic coastline until 2000 years ago. We only started really paying attention in the early Seventies, and now we freak out about every square mile that melts.
Climate scientists agree that we are contributing to climate change. The issue is that there is no consensus on what that impact is. The data on severe weather events is not long enough to draw accurate conclusions. We have data that shows storms in the 19th century were worse than today. Crowder is a conservative podcaster/ pundit. I don't agree with a lot of his positions and I consider myself a conservative.
@@iand654456 if hypothetically, climate scientists were able to conclude that humans had no impact on climate change, would those scientists continue to get funding for their research?
@@srdgrantAbsolutely. There are lots of people who would pay a lot of money for good studies on that. Source: my mother is a retired atmospheric scientist who used to contract for NASA. And if I can inject some opinion here, your comment seems profoundly ignorant of how science happens or how it gets funded . Do you have anything to offer to the conversation?
@srdgrant umm just trace the money. Before you ask that question you should follow the money. That goes for most climate science. There are some that are not funded by the wrong companies. As I stated above humans are contributing to climate change. No scientists deny this. However like I said above there is not enough data on weather patterns to say with any certainty that we are experiencing severe weather from climate change. There were hurricanes in the late 1800s that were more powerful than any we have had in the past 50 years.
Funny you should mention Peter Pan and Robin Williams. Robin Williams WAS Peter Pan in the movie Hook! If you ever start movie reactions, I highly recommend it. It's a great cast with a hearfelt message!
It's not that they're putting stuff in portabella mushrooms. The theory is that they're just not good for you and can be bad for you if not cooked well enough. What I've heard people say is that the mafia owns the largest portabella mushroom farms, and they threatened him if he came out with negative commentary on their cash crop. There's a whole rabbit hole to go down on that story, and I'm not sure what's at the end of it.
Yes, we knew the Earth is a globe for a long time based on science, and a few Flat Earthers just changed their minds by going on "The Final Experiment" trip to Antarctica recently.
I agree. When I was a teenager we'd get a couple feet of snow every year. Now nothing. This winter we are breaking records for the freezing weather. Right now it's 15 degrees in Pennsylvania. Feels like 5. Hello from PA USA 🇺🇸 💖 ❤❤
Here's the only question you need to ask about trans people in sports to determine if its fair or not. How many woman born trans men compete in male sports? If any how many are even successful at competing?
Please react to more norm MacDonald! Your videos reacting to him so far have been hilarious and my favorite by far, there's plenty more compilations and segments of him doing jokes on UA-cam that we'd love to see
Fun fact though that Joe eventually goes back on this feeling. I believe I recently heard him say that the earth has gone through many changes and that it’s not true.
I don’t have a strong opinion, but I look down on Joe for acting like he knows she’s wrong. No he doesn’t know we are effecting the environment, he only knows what he’s been told, so no different than her opinion. None of us can really know if humans are effecting that or if it would have happened naturally, we can’t actually test it! 4:48
You forgot that there is something as simple as data about average temperature, amount of tornado's and storms? You think scientists just put their cheeks in the sky and pull information out of that? There is data, LOL....
Stephen Crowder is a conservative Christian political commentator. He also does segments called "Change my mind". Where there will be some controversial topic and he will invite people to sit down and have a long conversation on the topic. And they can try and change his mind. His tshirt said " Jesus is risen - change my mind." Meaning he believes Jesus rose from the dead.
People honoring Judeo-Christian values do sit with all types. You hate the sin, and love the sinner. That's the value that leads to a greater society. It isn't an abandonment of beliefs and rules. It isn't an acceptance of perversions. It's knowing that all have fallen short of an ideal that we should strive for together. Jesus gave grace to people who needed to know a better way to live. He also judged those who unjustly judged others. Some cultures say there is no ultimate good, and some say that good is killing dissenters like a cancer. I think that the genuine Judeo-Christian culture elevates us all. I'm not defending Milo completely, but I see where he is coming from.
The weather always changed during the time of the conquest of the Aztec we had over 50 hurricanes a year hit Florida and sunk there treasure fleets of the Key West There was so many there was a Wrecker industry in Key West , Their was a string of the Coast of Lighthouse
Joe said to Candace, why have an opinion on something you know nothing about? Human-caused climate change is not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of data, facts and science. We can argue that climate change is occurring on Earth without human involvement, but we cannot argue that we are accelerating this process and directly and measurably changing the planet through our use of fossil resources, i.e. energy production.
Interesting, Joe's podcast are 3 plus hours long as a rule and when Joe first interviewed Jordan Peterson, Joe told Jordan at the end of the podcast that Jordan was the most important and best podcast he ever did, period! Now this was a few years ago and when Jordan did Joe's podcast it literally launched Jordan's career to what it is today!
The problem with the climate climate change issue is, we would have to give up everything. There are a lot of climate activists out their flying private Jets and buying beachfront property. And you don't hear anybody protesting China or India who are the biggest contributors. And the climate is constantly changing. I don't think humans contribute as much as people push. Although we need to do as much as we can without shutting down the economy. And we are. But some countries aren't doing the thing about it.
Earth is currently in the Quaternary Ice Age. We are currently in an interglacial period called the Holocene epoch, which is a warmer phase of the ice age. We should keep getting warmer for a long time, as we've been going through this for 2 1/2 Million years. As plant life continues to thrive (which we are greener than we've ever been in hundreds of years), the oxygen in the air will start to cool the planet into another Ice age, which could be millions of years from now.
FACT is that we have EVERYTHING in our faces these days. We live in the safest era in history and that’s a fact. But that’s hard to believe for ONE simple reason. Same thing with the weather. Weird occurrences have ALWAYS happened and that’s a fact. 1 guess why more people are more likely to freak about now than any other time in history. Mass histeria is Nothing if not extremely profitable.
No, give them their own leagues, and let them compete against each other. Hormone depletion does not change bone structure, arm, lengths, lung capacity, and a period of other things. Some that have competed, and we then disqualified to compete, we’re given the opportunity to compete in unit six competition, and would not compete. If they don’t want to compete in a fair competition, then they don’t want to compete.
I think that’s exactly the point. Not having the education to make a definitive statement. I’ll trust in the people that do. As Joe says 87% of scientists. I can look at the evidence and say there’s clearly evidence of something. I’ll trust in those that have the education and do the studies.
Is it at all possible that the studies are paid for and influenced by people with an agenda and will profit from a desired outcome of said research? Someone could easily say that 87% of scientists have been corrupted.
Why does Joe have to be so confrontational to the guy who wants to do JRE’s programming? Because that guy is one of those many many sneaky little weasels who wants to dip into Rogan’s Kool-Aid. And since Rogan has dealt with so many of those sneaky people over the years it’s very understandable for him to shut those greedy weasels down like that. It’s a bit cringe but the guy asked for it. Props to Rogan for putting dude in his place. And when it comes to the “fungus expert” at the end of the video, I think it would be better to refer to him as a “psilocybin mushroom expert.” And yes, it’s a super interesting and enlightening episode of the JRE. It’s actually the episode that introduced me to Joe Rogan.
Probably the best one was when he interviewed Sanjay Gupta from CNN during the whole covid thing when they were making Joe look green and all kind of stuff Saying ivermectin was horse medicine.
The earth has had 6 recorded ice ages. Guaranteed to be much much more but as long as humans have had the ability to log and keep records, there have been 6.
We are coming out of a mini ice age. The ocean levels are not rising. The highest level of CO2 on the planet was 3500 ppm during the Jurassic period and right now it’s at 400.
100 yrs is a blip in the history of earth. temperatures have flucuated since beginning of time. we had ice ages. and we will have more of them. short term temps trend are up, long term nothing out of ordinary. believe in science and statistics
Joe ain’t afraid to say shit. And you saying you don’t have enough info to have an opinion is the perfect way to say it. Easy as that. Some ppl always gotta have an opinion on shit.
I didn't think Rogan refusing to bet his programming on TPS was big dogging at all. It's a ridiculous thing to ask for as a bet. The other guy would need to put up millions in cash for that to be worth it.
Hello Mrs. Britt. I hope all is well with you and yours! Well, concerning climate change, there's been studies that show that The amount of carbon in the air is very minor. And is nowhere near danger levels. But all in all, you have 2 things going on. Well is our government, Well, not just our government but quite a few governments do what they call "cloud seeding". This is a method of weather manipulation which is causing the weird weather pattern. Secondly, the weather is doing what is supposed to do. When I was in school over 30 years ago they were saying that the world was going to freeze over in half. If not, most of America would be under ice.
I am very curious how the Grand Canyon was formed. How did the river create dead-end canyons? How did a river carve through higher elevations? Why is it a mile down from the surface? The Mississippi river displaces a lot of land yet is not a mile down from the surface.
I grew up in the 80s and the weather was the same as it is now I live in Alabama my kids grew up in the early 2 thousands the weather was still the same
Matt Walsh was absolutely right about gay marriage. Marriage for gays could have been called anything else under the law that could invoke the same meaning without using the religious term of marriage. It could have been a union of some other name. They specifically adapted the term marriage to diminish what it means to the church. They could have had their union by law without attacking the church.
I asked grok: Perceived Impact: From the perspective of those who hold a traditional Christian view of marriage, the legal recognition of same-sex marriage as "marriage" can indeed be perceived as an assault on their religious beliefs or traditions. This perception stems from the fact that for them, marriage has a specific, sacred meaning that they see as being altered or co-opted by secular law. Religious vs. Civil Marriage: The key here is the distinction between religious marriage and civil marriage: Religious Marriage: Within Christianity, or any other religion, marriage can retain its traditional definition within religious contexts. No one is altering the religious ceremony or doctrine unless a specific denomination chooses to do so. Civil Marriage: The term "marriage" in a legal context can be seen as a public institution that has evolved with societal values. When the law uses "marriage" for same-sex couples, it's defining a civil contract, not a religious one. Consequences of Legal Definitions: When civil law adopts the term "marriage" for same-sex unions, it does indeed lead to a situation where: Public discourse and legal documents use one term for what was traditionally two different concepts for some religious groups. This can lead to feelings of marginalization or cultural erasure among those who see marriage as strictly between a man and a woman from a religious standpoint. Cultural Conflict: This situation highlights a cultural conflict where: One group feels their religious identity and practices are being encroached upon by secular definitions. Another group sees the term "marriage" as rightfully theirs in the realm of civil rights, reflecting equality under the law.
Climate change is certainly happening but the severity and solutions are all over the place. Most of the time when people rail about climate change it is to get people to do something that is a total placebo.
The Earth can't be flat otherwise cats would have knocked everything off the edge by now.
Mhmm. These are the real facts nobody talks about. 😸
😂😂😂😂😂 good one.
Joe Rogan has changed his stance on climate change since the interview with Candace a few years ago.
Which is good he was accepting of better opinions
Global warming is exactly what Rogan said it wasn't, propaganda for profit of certain private interests.
The science for manmade global warming is not there AT ALL
There is no historical correlation between co2 levels and climate in Earth's 550M+ years of life giving climate history.
Co2 has been over 1,000% higher than now for millions of years and no "runaway warming,"
It has been triple what it is now and we have had glaciation and ice ages,
Did the laws of physics suddenly change or was there suddenly an agenda to build a centralised technocracy run by the elite that rules by diktats such as Net Zero?
If you ask a climate scientist why there was no runaway warming when Co2 was massively higher than now they say because solar radiation was lower, inadvertently admitting that the Sun drives climate not Co2 levels.
Imagine that, the huge ball of fire in the sky that provides all our heat is responsible for warmer and cooler cycles and not a cow farting, crazy!
As for Net Zero, just do the maths and it is a blatant scam.
In the UK our puppet Gov is forging ahead with the globalist agenda, UN Replacement Migration and UN Agenda 2030 as dictated by Davos and the WEF.
Reaching Net Zero in the UK at catastrophic cost to our standard of living and national security will reduce Co2 by 1 part in 1 million at best!
Atmospheric Co2 0.04%
UK global Co2 less than 1% = 0.0001% of atmosphere!
Meanwhile China, who the people who tell us we must give up everything in the West to save the planet left exempt from carbon taxes etc, produce more Co2 than the whole of US and Europe combined! Better still they invested heavily in the Chinese economy once that unlevel economic playing field had been achieved (China producing heap good with cheap energy The Western industry crippled) and moved their factories from Europe and the US to China which had China build thousands more dirty coal plants to keep u with demand!
So while I follow the science, the Global warming brigade follow the money.
It is funny Rogan got called a right wing conspiracy nut for daring to question these false paradigms by his own lefty serpents, I think helped wake him up and start applying more critical thinking instead of regurgitating establishment propaganda.
Climate is everchanging and humans are the dominant species on Earth, of course they have an effect on their environment so the expression "Climate change" is true if taken in the literal sense of the word... humans are not however these demigods they like themselves to think of as to be masters of the Earth...
the bullshit is just propaganda for the 5 federal environmental agencies and hundreds of state agencies that have budgets in the billions of dollars every year and who get a lot of lobbyists money too... at this point they're just bloodsucking leeches on the government...
@@PolitikPolitik-fh2qc You haven't watched this video, right? Joe said it, climate change is not a matter of OPINION, it's a matter of data, facts and science. And yes, since he is living in Texas and elites like Trump and Musk are part of his circle, he changed some of his opinions, but I dare you to show me where he denies the man made climate change. Because he doesn't. He changed his tune about the question if there is a clima change without humans, but he never denied the impact of human energy production on the planet and his environment.
@@PolitikPolitik-fh2qc exactly
Joe is the goat of interviewers imo. he doesn't give a fuck about any BS, and makes it clear, left or right when he doesn't agree or let shit go without challenge.
That’s old Joe 😂😂😂
I will be quick to say that “I don’t know. I’m not a scientist”. Climate is always changing. The argument is weather or not humans have caused the temperature rise. My opinion is that there is no way for us to know how much damage we have caused, but all this argument does is establish blame. Instead without blame I try to do as little damage to the environment as possible. Including, trying to minimize the amount of new stuff that I purchase. Buy quality things that will last my lifetime and more. Try and certainly not succeed but try to not buy items that are manufactured in a bad acting, polluting country. I drive well maintained used vehicles because a new car has a massive carbon footprint before it even leaves the dealership. I believe the answer is everyone taking accountability and not some people telling others how to live. And yes, Joe has had climate scientists on and is closer to Candace’s opinion now.
😂😂😂THE CLIMATE SCAM 😂😂😂
When I was in elementary school we were told that the planet was cooling and there was a coming ice age. Then the great environmental concern was acid rain, and we were told about this hole in the ozone layer that was going to cause the planet to warm. Now we no longer say the planet is cooling, I haven't heard acid rain mentioned in decades and the hole in the ozone layer is almost gone. Forgive me for not spending a fortune on an electric car, investing in windmills, and wanting to suffer rolling blackouts in the summer like our friends in California because they are relying on "green energy". You can argue that the planet is warming, but how much of that is caused by man, and how much of an affect are the proposed environmental standards going to have. Sorry, I'm not willing to go broke and give up on the internal combustion engine to save the planet.
They thought the planet would cool because of excessive smog reflecting sunlight, so we reduced smog and that problem went away. Acid rain was a problem, and so we further reduced chemicals we spew into the atmosphere, and the problem of acid rain went away. The hole in the ozone layer is healing because we banned air conditioning coolants that destroy ozone and required innovation in less harmful ones.
Now, the atmosphere is retaining heat because of excessive carbon and methane, and that's making climates shift hotter and creating more chaotic weather patterns.
You forgot about asbestos (caused tons of COPD and lung cancer), lead paint (caused tons of brain damage), and leaded gasoline exhaust (caused high rates of violent crime, especially in urban areas with more gasoline vehicles). We banned those, and now things are better.
But now, somehow trapping carbon and curbing methane is a bridge too far. Those dirty libs who were right about all that other stuff are suddenly somehow wrong about contemporary global climate change.
You're a regular Don Quixote, my dude. Only a donkey like yourself calls a wind turbine a "windmill".
I grew up with these similar statements by "scientists".
Technically we've already been through two maybe three so called apocalypses and we're still very much still here and the damn world isn't on fire. The only actual real concern as far as anything close to a "apocalypses" is if yellowstone erupts. That fucker goes off it will actually cover the world. doubt it'll kill off the human race but it'll make global warming a complete after thought.
@@ricksundberg5659 They seem to have switched after the Soviet Venus landings. They felt that global warming went crazy and heated the planet to 900 degrees and feared the same thing might happen on Earth.
The issue of acid rain was largely due to the sulphides being ejected into the from manufacturing and coal power plants. Regulations and new technology was put into place to reduce the emissions which helped stop the issue of acid rain.
The issue with ozone layer was the release of chlorofluorocarbons being released into the air through refrigerants and aerosols. Regulations and technology was put into place to reduce emissions and aerosol use and the spread of the hole in the ozone layer was eventually slowed, then stopped and is now in the process of regenerating itself.
Through cores done on glaciers, ice packs at the poles, lake beds and even tree growth, they’ve proven that the average annual temperature is rising at a higher rate than other cyclical periods of the current ice age we are in since the start of the Industrial Revolution where we started to see an increase in the pollutants being put into the environment and the exponential increase in the human population. This increase in average annual temperature effects the interactions of the ocean and atmosphere which results in greater extremes and frequencies of weather events that we are currently seeing.
The climate is definitely changing, just like it always has. The question is how much of that is caused by humans
He was around sinners in order to get them to change their ways
People think loving is condoning and they are wrong.
Plus a lot of times with his friends they're all high and on shrooms. lol
I think Joe was saying that his programing is priceless to him.
exactly. Joe was calling his bluff. no pissing contest. Not sure ive ever seen Joe engage in one of those unless its with real friends whos he's engaging in comedic banter with.
The guy was like a snake..A weak snake at that!!...He didn't offer up anything similar but JR should offer up his program??.And its something worthwhile at that! What a troll!
As a child of the 60’s since the early 70’s environmentalist have been telling us the world is coming to an end every couple of years. Guess what? I’am still here.
Funny the mental asylum closed in the 70 so we got crazy ecolo science
The great barrier reef ain't doing so well though, it's not all about you.
It's like most topics out into the political spectrum, and the best way to hide a lie. You bury it in observable truth.
Is it changing ? Yes, obviously.
Are we causing it ? No. We are affecting weather patterns by changing where the emissions occur. Move it from here to China, it immediately affects their weather. Causing a chain reaction. Change one, it causes the others to change as well.
Can we fix it ? No. If we could, solar and windmills, would be the last choice for alternative energy sources.
Well we can see it is getting warmer, we changed a lot to close the ozon, many species of animals have gone extinct and many or following. Nobody told you that there would be a day that suddenly life is over. It's a slow process. The average human seems to be only capable of thinking in extremes...
@ California environmentalist killed of more wildlife and polluted the air more in the last two weeks due their policies. So maybe it time to take a step back and rethink a few things
I remember the government lying to us. When I was a child in the 70s saying we would be out of oil in 10. It was Florida will be gone in 10 years. But here it is 2025 Florida still here and we've had plenty of oil.
I heard it was California that would be gone. Oh boy.
BLIND BOXING WOULD BE INCREDIBLE!!!
Weather has not changed drastically since you were a kid. There are not anymore tornadoes in 2024 then there were in 1960. There are not anymore hurricanes in 2024 then there were in 1970. In the 1960's the technology to predict and track tornados and hurricanes was not as advanced as the doppler weather radar of 2024. So we are able to track more of these weather events in 2024 then we could in the 50;s 60's and 70's. Giving the appearance of increases in weather anomalies.
Nah, I'm with Joe on the "week of programming" The guy was taking piss thinking that he could match those stakes. Sometimes people do need a reality check.
Please react to Guy Sebastian- no reason to stay ( the voice performance) he is an Australian artist and this performance is out of this world, he sings with so much emotion and passion. You could feel everything that he’s singing about.
The weather hasnt changed drastically. We just see a short time of weather.
she literally stating how she've seen it changed drastically just in here life time. And her sentiment isn't the only one. I grew up CT my whole life and i can see these changes as well
The Steven Crowder argument was oberblown on how heated it was. It was ony about 10 minutes while the interview was nearly 4 hours long. They easily moved onto a different topic and got calm throughout the rest of the episode. Joe Rogan also went onto Steven's show afterwards.
Iliza Shlesinger dropping the "yeah so what, I've had my mom on my podcast" was great. Joe wanted to flip so bad when it happened.
Britt. We are still technically in an ice age. The world is going to get way colder before it gets warm enough to worry about. The reason we dont have winters like we used to is because the north and south poles are consistently changing. Also if global warming is real then how have states in the south of the US starting to get freezing weather. 🥶
Why don’t any women want to transition and compete against men. 🤔
they do one transitioned to compete in boxing or mma and got destroyed..
Climate change catastrophists are no different than a disheveled man holding a sign on the street corner that says: "The end is Nigh". The climate is changing, has changed, and will forever change in periods longer than a lifetime - people all have examples of climate change because of this fact. But what we do is forget from generation to generation... and those who stand to gain from this, do.
The changing climate is something we can adapt to if only we were truthful about it.
Back in 1990 I lived in Alpharetta, GA and I remember swimming in the apartment complex outdoor pool in March. So it was warm then. lol
If global warming is right , how has the farmers almanac been right for my entire life as a farmer ?
Weather changes. Always has. Always will.
You’re drinking the Kool-Aid!!!!!😳
Weather throughout time has had pattern changes. It’s not a bad thing. It all eventually comes back around.
Regarding climate change:
1) if coastal cities are at risk, why are beach houses so expensive and sort after? Wouldn't they be worthless in a few years?
2) we are coming out of a 12k year ice age cycle, meaning the climate is warming.
3) there seem to be massive natural methane deposits that have recently started to leak and methane is apparently worse than co2 for warning, so yikes.
4) people in power who push this hard, their private life seems to not care how much their private plane produces, amongst other things.
What is your point though. Because these 4 things you said kind of conflict with each other.
Beach houses are expensive because people value living close to the beach. That's a simple answer. And clearly people don't take climate change seriously, believe in it and neither do we know when the sea level will rise. It's not a simple calculation.
Yes the ice age cycle, but that is less accurate information than simply having statistics of average temperature in the passed years.
And yes people in their private life don't always match their public stance. But whether they do or do not match, it does not change the fact whether climate change is real or not.
What? Your post doesn't make much sense. I mean, if you can't understand why beach houses are so expensive when there's a risk that they'll be part of the ocean in the near future, I highly doubt you have the mental capacity to even begin to understand the subject, which your questions prove, by the way. You're missing a lot of basic knowledge and the intelligence to process this information.
If evidence that reinforces or validates your argument exist, you should indeed present it. That's a good thing. The only people not on board with that are the people who love to argue for the sake of arguing.
No because as a data analyst it can be manipulated easy. Just because data exist does not make it reliable
@9:40 "JESUS IS RISEN"
On Christmas eve in 1977 in the southern tier of NY, we had a snowstorm so heavy that minimum measurements were 3 feet, just over night! As a child through the 70, a teen through the early to mid 80s, Christmas was always a very snowy holiday. Through the winter we'd get negative temperatures that kept rivers and dams thickly frozen over for months, and we didn't see grass until April.
On Christmas day in 1994, I stepped outside to a 64-ish degree day, very green grass, and not a snowflake in sight. Since then, we've had way warmer winters, and in the last three years, we've barely had any snow at all. Strangely, on May 8th & 9th in 2020, we had snow blizzards strong enough to create whiteout visibility. Just one week before this we had clear sunny skies and 75 degrees. And one week after this strange snowy event we had very clear and sunny skies and 80sum degrees.
Why the drastic change in weather or climate here in the Southern Tier? And what does this mean for future generations? Who best to answer this question? Climate Scientists or politicians who are very much not Climate Scientists? And what does a Climate Scientist have to gain in lying about the results of their studies? What does a politician have to gain about lying to their constituents? I'm more likely to believe a scientist over a politician regarding something like this.
Who pays the "Climate scientists"? Who funds their organizations? Who has international programs manipulating weather across whole regions of the planet? How far are the poles shifting each year? How much has solar activity increased the last decade? What brought us into the inter-glacial period and out of the last ice age 13,000 years ago? Those are the questions you should look into.
@@NickJayy212 So, ignore all the lies and deceptions from politicians just to satisfy your narrative. Gotcha. There's no point in looking at this holistically because what good could come of that.
@@HailinBlue no, if you looked into the answers to those questions, they'd point right at the politicians. And not just ours, either.
In the billions of years of history of the earth, there have been numerous "ice ages" and with each ice age, there is a "warm-out" from said ice age...some scientists believe we're still warming out from the last ice age 25000 yrs ago and it might continue to warm for hundreds if not thousands of years to come.
We're currently in what's called an interglacial period, named the Holocene epoch, a more moderate temperature section of the current ice age, which is known as the Quaternary Period (which also includes the Pleistocene epoch).
The fact that we still have polar ice caps proves we're still in an ice age.
Barstools is a sports social media thing.
It comes down to this:
1. Rich man or poor? - the answer is rich
2. Athletic man or a grub? - the answer is athletic
3. Athletic rich man or athletic poor man? - the answer is athletic rich
I rest my case.
Jesus is the ultimate judge, he would say those things. Have you read the whole Bible? Jesus never says to not judge. Christ is King!
He literally says not to judge in Matt. 7:1. However, that doesn't mean we can't identify someone who is doing something wrong but we would be more like a witness.
@@rivera2030 Actually we are taught as Christians to use a righteous judgement.
Here's my take on the climate thing: the data clearly shows that the climate changes over time. I had a good conversation with my physics professor who was doing climate modeling for his phd, and his take was that there is so much data, that's about as clear as you're going to get on climate consensus. How much the WEATHER (big difference here that ill get into) is changing due to human activity is too complex of a question to answer, just like exactly how much impact one person has on the economy as a whole; and due to this, its generally a bad idea to advocate for governments to push for a complete overhaul of the entire economy in unrealistic time frames with no alternative fuel source and infrastructure in place to facilitate that change.
We aren't gonna legislate our way out of climate change and its a fools game to try. Does that mean we should neglect the environment and not be responsible caretakers of our home? Absolutely not, but we do need to have a much more clear idea of the problem before we attempt to fix it, lest we mess it up worse, and if there's one thing the government is good at, its creating a problem where there is none in order to give itself more power to deal with that problem, and any power utilized by the government carries an implicit threat of force. Comply, or else. Ultimately, governments are awful at preventing humanitarian problems, and more often than not is the cause behind them.
What we, as a society, and as one of the most powerful logistic enterprises ever created as a nation, ARE good at is overcoming mother nature. Sure natural disasters happen, and sea levels are rising and that will cost money, work, and lives to overcome, but coastal damage isn't an insurmountable problem and there's a big difference between climate change and weather pattern differences over small periods of time (climate models generally take thousands to millions of years, versus weather patterns changing over periods of dozens to hundreds of years), and the fact that the average American can't tell the difference is both a failure of the education system, as well as something politicians, green energy corporations, and big tech capitalize on to enrich and empower themselves.
Another important point is that even if we did try to fix it through heavy handed government enforcement, what about the rest of the world? China and India aren't going to invest the untold trillions of dollars it would take to completely overhaul their infrastructure to a "more green" energy source, and they'd certain love to see us shoot ourselves in the foot trying to do so, because, hey, more cheap fuel for them right? Good luck on getting the whole of humanity to get on board with fixing the planet, most of us can't even keep our house in order, much less our local community. There's bigger fish to fry, and climate change should be much lower on the list of things we needs to address as a society than it is.
I could go on and on on this topic, it's on of those things where it's too complex to boil down to a simple question of "Do you believe in climate change?", because the question is so vague, any answer given is necessarily vague and doesn't encompass all of the things that the climate affects.
Sorry brit, I spent so long typing, I skimmed through the rest of the video. I've seen most of those conversations and half of them are either morons or grifters, and the other half were conversations that could have gone a lot better. Not interested in flat earth, skip, not interested in nutritionists taking jabs at each other skip, saw the conversation with Matt Walsh, and I think there's something to be said for his stance on gay marriage violating the sanctity of marriage, mainly that he's entitled to his opinion as a Christian, but again its kind of a terrible gotcha question where if you so much as insinuate something anti-gay, you're a bigot and aren't worth listening to. I can simultaneously think that homosexuality is a sin in the Christian tradition, and think that it should absolutely be allowed in a government that professes to value Religious freedom. I have a sibling who has had difficulty with identifying their sexuality, and it doesn't make one bit of difference to me who they choose to love, so long as that love is expressed healthily and is reciprocated in kind.
The anti -pot argument was a fail on both parties part, with Crowder continually professing to not know enough to have an opinion, and joe continually misinterpreting his not wanting to debate the issue as flat out, "you're wrong, it should be banned" disagreement. Skip.
Milo eventually had a huge change of heart with regards to Christianity as well has his own homosexuality some time after this, from what I remember, but I don't follow him closely enough to say more, and some of his takes are pretty out there. A lot of these guests a just rage bait. Skip.
Paul Stamets (not sure if i spelled that right) is an interesting character, but I gotta take anything someone who regularly ingests hallucinogens' with a grain of salt. If remember correctly he was the one that came up with the stoned ape theory, and if it understand it correctly, I think it might have some merit, but what do I know?
The Tyson one could have been handled better. I think I understand why Tyson was trying to say; He's question the nature of the prevalence of sadism in warriors culture, and it's a topic worth exploring, I just think that Joe isn't the person to ask on this because Joe doesn't experience sadistic pleasure in conquering his opponents, or at least, hasn't for a long time (although he has mentioned that you have to have a ruthless, "I'm going to take your head off" mindset when he was fighting professionally.) He trains as a matter of discipline and self defense, not as a way to exorcise his demons. Jordan Peterson has some good lectures on the topic in his Personality and it's Transformations Lectures from his University teaching days, and I highly encourage checking those out; they were really eye opening to me and a fascinating insight into psychology.
Wow I didn't mean to write that much.
The Eddie Bravo interview from this clip was wild.
Portnoy is the founder of Barstool Sports. Barstool Sports is an American blog website and digital media company headquartered in New York City that publishes sports journalism and pop culture-related content.
Joe is protecting his business
not a argument, just a old fashion debate, each to their own.
REgarding climate change, there's a few factors that are largely ignored. One is that the Sun undergoes several cycles that affect the Earth's temperature. IIRC, the shortest is 11 years, and the longest is over 2000. If all or several of those are at peak at the same time, we're definitely going to feel it.
Another is that in Dec. 2021-Jan. 2022, an underwater volcano near Tonga erupted for almost a whole month. Continuously spewing water heated to several thousand degrees into the atmosphere, into the jet stream, screwing up the pattern of that jet stream as it spread the steam around the planet. Then, at the end, it exploded with enough force to punch right through the jet stream, through the atmosphere, and into space. This will affect the climate of the whole globe until at least 2038.
Last point, they keep harping on the ice caps melting. Those have been melting for 14,000 years already. The polar ice cap used to reach all the way to the Canada-US border. There was no Arctic coastline until 2000 years ago. We only started really paying attention in the early Seventies, and now we freak out about every square mile that melts.
And the poles are shifting ~35 miles per year as of now.
New subscriber and I absolutely love you ❤❤❤
I'm sure our friends in the UK would surely agree with your take on other religions and their values.
Yeah, I hear Islam is all about loving your neighbor..........
Climate scientists agree that we are contributing to climate change. The issue is that there is no consensus on what that impact is. The data on severe weather events is not long enough to draw accurate conclusions. We have data that shows storms in the 19th century were worse than today. Crowder is a conservative podcaster/ pundit. I don't agree with a lot of his positions and I consider myself a conservative.
Oh, ok.gotcha!
@@iand654456 if hypothetically, climate scientists were able to conclude that humans had no impact on climate change, would those scientists continue to get funding for their research?
Weather is highly variable. Much better evidence of climate change is ocean acidification.
@@srdgrantAbsolutely. There are lots of people who would pay a lot of money for good studies on that. Source: my mother is a retired atmospheric scientist who used to contract for NASA. And if I can inject some opinion here, your comment seems profoundly ignorant of how science happens or how it gets funded . Do you have anything to offer to the conversation?
@srdgrant umm just trace the money. Before you ask that question you should follow the money. That goes for most climate science. There are some that are not funded by the wrong companies. As I stated above humans are contributing to climate change. No scientists deny this. However like I said above there is not enough data on weather patterns to say with any certainty that we are experiencing severe weather from climate change. There were hurricanes in the late 1800s that were more powerful than any we have had in the past 50 years.
Funny you should mention Peter Pan and Robin Williams. Robin Williams WAS Peter Pan in the movie Hook! If you ever start movie reactions, I highly recommend it. It's a great cast with a hearfelt message!
Hope you and the fam are doing well 💯
It's not that they're putting stuff in portabella mushrooms. The theory is that they're just not good for you and can be bad for you if not cooked well enough. What I've heard people say is that the mafia owns the largest portabella mushroom farms, and they threatened him if he came out with negative commentary on their cash crop. There's a whole rabbit hole to go down on that story, and I'm not sure what's at the end of it.
Yes, we knew the Earth is a globe for a long time based on science, and a few Flat Earthers just changed their minds by going on "The Final Experiment" trip to Antarctica recently.
No ,one person is always right! We all fall short in the eyes of the lord .
I agree. When I was a teenager we'd get a couple feet of snow every year. Now nothing. This winter we are breaking records for the freezing weather. Right now it's 15 degrees in Pennsylvania. Feels like 5. Hello from PA USA 🇺🇸 💖 ❤❤
There is a literal place on earth where you can set you're feet onto and see its not flat. Its called Antarctica and 24hr sun.
Here's the only question you need to ask about trans people in sports to determine if its fair or not. How many woman born trans men compete in male sports? If any how many are even successful at competing?
Please react to more norm MacDonald! Your videos reacting to him so far have been hilarious and my favorite by far, there's plenty more compilations and segments of him doing jokes on UA-cam that we'd love to see
We should be more worried about the pollution of the water and soil
I'm not even religious, but when she said "would Jesus write your comment?!" that hit me hard...
Fun fact though that Joe eventually goes back on this feeling. I believe I recently heard him say that the earth has gone through many changes and that it’s not true.
I don’t have a strong opinion, but I look down on Joe for acting like he knows she’s wrong. No he doesn’t know we are effecting the environment, he only knows what he’s been told, so no different than her opinion. None of us can really know if humans are effecting that or if it would have happened naturally, we can’t actually test it! 4:48
You forgot that there is something as simple as data about average temperature, amount of tornado's and storms? You think scientists just put their cheeks in the sky and pull information out of that? There is data, LOL....
How do we explain changes? Urbanization has huge effect on LOCAL clima and how you percieve the clima in you surrounding.
That T-shirt you were asking about says "Jesus is Risen"
Stephen Crowder is a conservative Christian political commentator. He also does segments called "Change my mind". Where there will be some controversial topic and he will invite people to sit down and have a long conversation on the topic. And they can try and change his mind. His tshirt said " Jesus is risen - change my mind." Meaning he believes Jesus rose from the dead.
People honoring Judeo-Christian values do sit with all types. You hate the sin, and love the sinner. That's the value that leads to a greater society. It isn't an abandonment of beliefs and rules. It isn't an acceptance of perversions. It's knowing that all have fallen short of an ideal that we should strive for together. Jesus gave grace to people who needed to know a better way to live. He also judged those who unjustly judged others. Some cultures say there is no ultimate good, and some say that good is killing dissenters like a cancer. I think that the genuine Judeo-Christian culture elevates us all. I'm not defending Milo completely, but I see where he is coming from.
The weather always changed during the time of the conquest of the Aztec we had over 50 hurricanes a year hit Florida and sunk there treasure fleets of the Key West There was so many there was a Wrecker industry in Key West , Their was a string of the Coast of Lighthouse
reading this comment section is sometimes hard. rly enjoy your reactions britt. much love from germany
Jesus wouldn't type anything cause he didn't have a cell phone 😎
The problem with climate change is the grift. Paying more taxes to the government won't change a damn thing
Joe said to Candace, why have an opinion on something you know nothing about? Human-caused climate change is not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of data, facts and science. We can argue that climate change is occurring on Earth without human involvement, but we cannot argue that we are accelerating this process and directly and measurably changing the planet through our use of fossil resources, i.e. energy production.
Interesting, Joe's podcast are 3 plus hours long as a rule and when Joe first interviewed Jordan Peterson, Joe told Jordan at the end of the podcast that Jordan was the most important and best podcast he ever did, period! Now this was a few years ago and when Jordan did Joe's podcast it literally launched Jordan's career to what it is today!
The problem with the climate climate change issue is, we would have to give up everything. There are a lot of climate activists out their flying private Jets and buying beachfront property. And you don't hear anybody protesting China or India who are the biggest contributors. And the climate is constantly changing. I don't think humans contribute as much as people push. Although we need to do as much as we can without shutting down the economy. And we are. But some countries aren't doing the thing about it.
Earth is currently in the Quaternary Ice Age. We are currently in an interglacial period called the Holocene epoch, which is a warmer phase of the ice age. We should keep getting warmer for a long time, as we've been going through this for 2 1/2 Million years. As plant life continues to thrive (which we are greener than we've ever been in hundreds of years), the oxygen in the air will start to cool the planet into another Ice age, which could be millions of years from now.
Joe's show now has a completely different vibe.
People will state opinion as fact and have zero awareness of that, as you can see.
So snow cancels school and you wonder about global warming?
Weather is not climate.
i miss the days when joe was an equal opportunity confronter. if he had steven crowder or candace owens on now, he would just blow smoke all day.
FACT is that we have EVERYTHING in our faces these days. We live in the safest era in history and that’s a fact. But that’s hard to believe for ONE simple reason. Same thing with the weather. Weird occurrences have ALWAYS happened and that’s a fact.
1 guess why more people are more likely to freak about now than any other time in history.
Mass histeria is Nothing if not extremely profitable.
No, give them their own leagues, and let them compete against each other. Hormone depletion does not change bone structure, arm, lengths, lung capacity, and a period of other things. Some that have competed, and we then disqualified to compete, we’re given the opportunity to compete in unit six competition, and would not compete. If they don’t want to compete in a fair competition, then they don’t want to compete.
I think that’s exactly the point. Not having the education to make a definitive statement. I’ll trust in the people that do. As Joe says 87% of scientists. I can look at the evidence and say there’s clearly evidence of something. I’ll trust in those that have the education and do the studies.
Is it at all possible that the studies are paid for and influenced by people with an agenda and will profit from a desired outcome of said research? Someone could easily say that 87% of scientists have been corrupted.
Why does Joe have to be so confrontational to the guy who wants to do JRE’s programming? Because that guy is one of those many many sneaky little weasels who wants to dip into Rogan’s Kool-Aid. And since Rogan has dealt with so many of those sneaky people over the years it’s very understandable for him to shut those greedy weasels down like that. It’s a bit cringe but the guy asked for it. Props to Rogan for putting dude in his place. And when it comes to the “fungus expert” at the end of the video, I think it would be better to refer to him as a “psilocybin mushroom expert.” And yes, it’s a super interesting and enlightening episode of the JRE. It’s actually the episode that introduced me to Joe Rogan.
Surviving barstool is probably the biggest thing on UA-cam rn. A show of barstool employees playing the game show survivor for $250000
Probably the best one was when he interviewed Sanjay Gupta from CNN during the whole covid thing when they were making Joe look green and all kind of stuff Saying ivermectin was horse medicine.
The earth has had 6 recorded ice ages. Guaranteed to be much much more but as long as humans have had the ability to log and keep records, there have been 6.
Awesomeness
Cadence doesn't believe in dinosaurs, that's all I have to say
Britt could talk about dance and music for a couple of hours.
You should look up the global warming crisis because it’s one of the most scientific studies ever! 😊
Jesus Christ isn't-on otherside; yourself, song, acceptance were all I saw when- I died.
GOD only controls the weather!!
We are coming out of a mini ice age. The ocean levels are not rising. The highest level of CO2 on the planet was 3500 ppm during the Jurassic period and right now it’s at 400.
100 yrs is a blip in the history of earth. temperatures have flucuated since beginning of time. we had ice ages. and we will have more of them. short term temps trend are up, long term nothing out of ordinary. believe in science and statistics
Joe ain’t afraid to say shit. And you saying you don’t have enough info to have an opinion is the perfect way to say it. Easy as that. Some ppl always gotta have an opinion on shit.
The fungus expert is real interesting
If anyone knows anything about how scientists get their money,you would understand why so many go along with the narrative
Genesis 8:22 - "While the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, shall not cease.”
I didn't think Rogan refusing to bet his programming on TPS was big dogging at all. It's a ridiculous thing to ask for as a bet. The other guy would need to put up millions in cash for that to be worth it.
Eddie and Joe are guys who talk shit and so does portnoy. That’s what dudes talking shit looks like.
Hello Mrs. Britt.
I hope all is well with you and yours! Well, concerning climate change, there's been studies that show that
The amount of carbon in the air is very minor.
And is nowhere near danger levels. But all in all, you have 2 things going on. Well is our government, Well, not just our government but quite a few governments do what they call "cloud seeding". This is a method of weather manipulation which is causing the weird weather pattern. Secondly, the weather is doing what is supposed to do. When I was in school over 30 years ago they were saying that the world was going to freeze over in half. If not, most of America would be under ice.
Ask yourself how the grand canyon was formed. Or the next time a volcano erupts go stop it.Guess what. We're still here!!
I am very curious how the Grand Canyon was formed.
How did the river create dead-end canyons? How did a river carve through higher elevations?
Why is it a mile down from the surface? The Mississippi river displaces a lot of land yet is not a mile down from the surface.
I grew up in the 80s and the weather was the same as it is now I live in Alabama my kids grew up in the early 2 thousands the weather was still the same
Matt Walsh was absolutely right about gay marriage.
Marriage for gays could have been called anything else under the law that could invoke the same meaning without using the religious term of marriage.
It could have been a union of some other name. They specifically adapted the term marriage to diminish what it means to the church.
They could have had their union by law without attacking the church.
I asked grok:
Perceived Impact: From the perspective of those who hold a traditional Christian view of marriage, the legal recognition of same-sex marriage as "marriage" can indeed be perceived as an assault on their religious beliefs or traditions. This perception stems from the fact that for them, marriage has a specific, sacred meaning that they see as being altered or co-opted by secular law.
Religious vs. Civil Marriage: The key here is the distinction between religious marriage and civil marriage:
Religious Marriage: Within Christianity, or any other religion, marriage can retain its traditional definition within religious contexts. No one is altering the religious ceremony or doctrine unless a specific denomination chooses to do so.
Civil Marriage: The term "marriage" in a legal context can be seen as a public institution that has evolved with societal values. When the law uses "marriage" for same-sex couples, it's defining a civil contract, not a religious one.
Consequences of Legal Definitions: When civil law adopts the term "marriage" for same-sex unions, it does indeed lead to a situation where:
Public discourse and legal documents use one term for what was traditionally two different concepts for some religious groups.
This can lead to feelings of marginalization or cultural erasure among those who see marriage as strictly between a man and a woman from a religious standpoint.
Cultural Conflict: This situation highlights a cultural conflict where:
One group feels their religious identity and practices are being encroached upon by secular definitions.
Another group sees the term "marriage" as rightfully theirs in the realm of civil rights, reflecting equality under the law.
Climate change is certainly happening but the severity and solutions are all over the place. Most of the time when people rail about climate change it is to get people to do something that is a total placebo.