Conversation with Ruth Bader Ginsburg: US Supreme Court Justice Live at UChicago
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 чер 2024
- The original live stream of this video is available on UChicago's Harris School of Public Policy's Facebook Page here: / 412236976096383
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will visit the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy on Sept. 9 for a conversation hosted by Harris Public Policy Dean Katherine Baicker, who will award Justice Ginsburg the 2019 Harris Dean’s Award. The award is given annually to an exceptional leader who has championed analytically rigorous, evidence-based approaches to policy, and who is an example for the next generation of policy leaders and scholars.
Dean Katherine Baicker hosts a conversation with Justice Ginsburg and presents her with Harris School of Public Policy Dean’s Award. Full Story: news.uchicago.edu/story/us-su...
0:00 - Program Begins
0:33 - Welcome from Hilarie Koplow-Mcadams
4:07 - Dean Katherine Baicker Introduction of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
4:45 - How has the court changed?
8:05 - RBG Friendship with Justice Scalia
11:55 - RBG on Justice John Paul Stevens' constitutional amendments
13:30 - Has the trajectory of women’s rights evolved over the last 40 years as you would have imagined it?
34:34 - Is U.S. Law as it stands able to deal with corporations and their power, or is there a need for law to adjust to our modern reality?
42:30 - Has the current political climate changed your mind on lifetime court appointments?
➡ Subscribe: bit.ly/UCHICAGOytSubscribe
About #UChicago:
Since its founding in 1890, the University of Chicago has been a destination for rigorous inquiry and field-defining research. This transformative academic experience empowers students and scholars to challenge conventional thinking in pursuit of original ideas.
#UChicago on the Web:
Home: bit.ly/UCHICAGO-homepage
News: bit.ly/UCHICAGO-news
Facebook: bit.ly/UCHICAGO-FB
Twitter: bit.ly/UCHICAGO-TW
Instagram: bit.ly/UCHICAGO-IG
University of Chicago on UA-cam:
/ uchicago
***
ACCESSIBILITY: If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please email digicomm@uchicago.edu.
What if we were more like RBG and Scalia? What if we could disagree and still show respect and dignity to our friends across the aisle.
That's why I believe RBG would approve of ACB. They both respected & appreciated Scalia. Amy interned for Scalia.
I remember when Justice Ginsburg was having her confirmation hearings and I was watching due to recuperating from a broken hip. What a great intellectual mind and so compassionate. She will be greatly missed and thanks Justice Ginsburg for your service to this country. RIP
I am so grateful for interviews like this and will scour UA-cam for as many of these gems 💎 as there might be. RIP RBG.
Disagreed with the majority of the decisions I have read by her and she is still one of the most inspiring justices I know of.
RIP RBG You will be missed.
R.I.P. Ruth you were a T O W E R I N G figure in our lives. We mourn you like the hero of our nation that you were.
UA-cam Moderator I’m sorry
You were an amazing woman for our times. Thank you for all you have done for us in this great country. You will be missed . RIP Justice RBG.
My heart is broken... you are a force,
a bright warm light to us all.
Ruth May you rest in eternal power as you did on earth. We will continue to push as you taught us to.
We love and honor you forever and always..... love a little Jewish girl ❤️
LOVE YOU, RUTH!
i love you Justice Ruth... please guide us from above
Bless her delightful heart and great mind and lived life with kindness and wisdom.
Even tho we disagree I hope Justice Ginsburg gets better no one should die of cancer !! Much respect !!
Fly high Notorious RBG 😭😭😭😭 you will be so greatly missed. Thank you for all you have done for our nation 💖
What a brilliant mind. RBG was a feminist who believed in true equality. She often was an advocate for equal parenting. Contrast that with the present breed of radical feminists who only want rights but no responsibilities. Thanks for enriching our lives, RBG
Thank you Justice RBG for always being stable or your convictions
"All Gram wanted is for her to survive".....thanks from this grandma Ruth......K-SHE 95 LOVES A REAL ROCKER
It's eerie to think about how she passed away roughly a year from this talk. Make all of your days count. No one knows when it's their turn to go.
THANKS YOU
Thanks for posting this excellent interview. RIP, RBG!
BEAUTIFUL RUTH!
👑 on the supreme court rip ruth bader
Fantastic interview!
RIP Ruth. You strived to give us peace. Now you deserve to rest!
She helped women kill their babies. What peace are you referring to
Justice Ruth Ginsberg is my greatest Hero's. She a living proof that with determination, everything is possible.
Think again. All is about to change.
"Thankyou, *Ms. Ruth B. Ginsberg; for the, numerous years of inspirations. May, Our Heavenly Father; spare you, Ms. Ruth B. Ginsberg, with more years of, good Health!"
Yours Truly,
Vernese Eilene Butler
Tragically God decided to take her into his presence. RIP RBG a tiny woman but Titan in the law.
She was a brilliant mind, a living legend. During her long life, she's been through some hard stuff, but she never played anything down, she never wavered, she told the truth. She stood for human rights. The rights of all the American people. Regardless of who they are. In one word: She stood for justice. I guess that's what our president had in mind when he said truthfully:« She was an amazing woman, whether you agree or not.»ua-cam.com/video/24QKYig1prU/v-deo.html
I m big fan of Justice Ginsburg but may always agree with her ruling.The lady is some tuff cookie and few her legal intellect .
So sad but I hope her legacy doesn't get lost in political discourse in history.
I'll miss you mama Ruth
God Bless you, your chair
is waiting for you in Haven..
Dear Robert Johnson:
I’m going to preface my comments with the fact that I really like Justice Ginsberg, and I strongly agree with her on removing gender bias in our laws. But you don’t have to listen to her for too long to see that she is also playing the game of, “let’s get even.“
I understand that in the main stream public domain justice Ginsburg can do no wrong and she he is the perfect person. But in fact she is like the rest of us, not perfect in her judgment, and this is a strong argument against the concentration of any kind of power, one human over another, which is my main mantra.
So now I make a case against her flawed judgment. Possibly this is a capital crime but I will do it anyway!
Starting at 27:05, regarding the European court of justice ruling on “roughly” equal candidates for a job, where one is a man and the other is a woman, the ruling was that the woman should be selected every time because of implicit bias, therefore she was likely better qualified, therefore the female candidate should always get the job. Justice Ginsburg sees this as just fine, but it is a moral and logical fallacy.
The claim I make is against the notion that in every single case implicit bias exists, and always against the woman. Where is the evidence for this in contemporary times? Certainly it existed in many situations in the past, but in the present? It is impossible to conceive uniform and prevailing prejudice always against women in our present times.
Recently I was with One of my best friends, a male manager who hires a lot of people and it was clear to me after listening to him that he favors women for promotion and hiring when they are physically attractive - that came through loud and clear Even though he was presenting himself as the most fair and best manager ever.
It seems we need a law that when there are two candidates, and one is an attractive female and the other is an ugly guy, we should always choose the ugly guy because of implicit bias. What about that justice Ginsburg?
Justice Ginsburg was on the right track when she talked about the symphony and how the best way to hire was to listen to the musician candidates playing behind a curtain so that you could not see them. Of course this is the right thing to do, and I myself have long advocated for this approach.
Justice Ginsburg was a very smart person and Often she was fair and just in her rulings, yet, she was far from good enough to wield so much power (The same for the rest of the justices by and large - I can only endorse those who do not want to wield power, the likes of justice Scalia).
The obvious right thing to do when two candidates are so called “ roughly equal in qualifications“ is to flip a coin.
And that sums up my opinion of the legal system. As a male, I prefer the flip of a coin rather than “get even justice.”
I conclude with this: I don’t have to prove that justice Ginsburg operated on a “ get even” policy. Almost every news report regarding her great career concludes with her own statement, “how many female justices on the Supreme Court is enough? Answer: 9 (all of them)”. While she says this rather jokingly, we know the main point of any joke is it’s core truth. You can just see it in her that she resents the fact that the court was all male for most of 200 years, and now we need 200 years of “get even.”
I rest my case for all eternity!
Deutsche Untertitel wäre klasse ...
Imagine a world without pity parties!! NO? ok
Rest In peace Ruth Bade Ginsburg
I'd like to understand why the USSC doesn't make many decisions on cases originating from the UCMJ.
Opinions are like a__h____s everybody has one.
"Anger is not a useful emotion" - is it not now? She voted for abortions...We need to vote to have a limited term for Supreme judges. NO "GOOD BEHAVIOR" BULLSHIT! YOU SHOULD NOT BE A SUPREME COURT JUDGE FOR LIFE!!!
Repugnikkkans could not even wait for RGB's body to cool down and they are already fighting over replacing her? Such a shame. At least they could have waited until after her burial. What's the rush?
wow !
Supreme Court Justice of the United States Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Be a lady and be independent.
Not too good design
I wonder what birth control will look like now...
Why would they ride an elephant? We need someone as intelligent and sensitive as Ruth Ginsburg for animal protection.
What about when the law is just wrong and you cede half of Oklahoma to a Native American tribe so that you can let murderers go free?
It was always theirs. All of the country was always theirs.
@Z Tar Mexico? The indigenous. Canada? The indigenous. Italy? The Romans. Which currently rule Italy so ?
@Z Tar The only difference is, over here, the indigenous are still alive. Suffering, but they're alive and without any reparations
Do you know what native is?
As a Chickasaw and an Oklahoman. The tribes are sovereign. The deal/treaty was to provide the land as a reservation. It was then taken. The case you’re talking about will open up new cases, I’m sure, that will possibly allow convicts to go free (only time will tell), but it also helps start correcting one of America’s original sins by returning the shitty real estate that was given to us.