Scientist, "We don't know what it is, but we can detect it." "So we are going to call it this new thing, and say that it is still science, yay." Ok, get outtta Dodge with this stuff, seriously? The song Black Star by Lustmord is more believable at this point.
@@RunToEternity They can't even detect dark matter. The spiral arms of galaxies rotate faster than they should according to the current understanding of gravity, so scientists theorized a new type of matter that doesn't interact with electromagnetic energy, but still has mass, to account for the extra gravity needed for the spiral arm rotation velocity. It is inductive logic, which is fine, but it isn't testable yet. People talk about dark matter as if it has been proven real, and I haven't seen anything to suggest that. Maybe it is, or maybe the theory of gravity is wrong at that scale, much like Einstein improved on Newton's theory. I don't think scientists like to admit that as a possibility.
Dark matter can be glimpsed in what we know as the void, but truly observed in the true void or space between Galaxies. Thats why its very hard to prove. As we do the information changes, needing new proof again. Super massive black holes are just a collection and massing of dark stars that eventually do form what can be considered a singularity, or a natural galactic recycling machine. Dark stars are just collapsed stars that had the right mass and chemistry to form something even denser than a neutron star. Personally im not sure dark matter, dark stars, and black holes are even correlated but understanding all three and how theyre related would answer questions beyond mans current scope.
The human knowledge about Dark Matter is like ants not knowing that there's superheated plasma behind a glass bulb near them, that there's molten lava beneath them, that there's large oceans surrounding huge landmasses far far away from their humble mounds, that there's a huge ball of plasma giving energy to every life on a planet they're living in... and that there's giant creatures walking by near them not knowing and not seeing that could one day step on their tiny bodies.
Yep. We really don't know much beyond apples and gravity. Ask a quantum physicist what we know about the quantum world, they'll tell you we know very little. We might know what we don't know, which is a great start, but we truly, honestly, and demonstrably know very little in regards.to the very big and the very little.
I do, but I wouldn’t solve Nobel prize worthy shit for my undergrad or a phd to be able to claim an appeal to authority; but they might just give me an honorary degree yet 🥱🧐🤣
We are learning new information about the universe by leaps and bounds , though relatively we know very little . We know a lot more than we did just a few decades ago .
@@jimmcdougall9973Science fundamentally is observational. It grinds my gears when people don't actually understand what science and the scientific method are.
@@jimmcdougall9973 Replace that last "theory" in your comment with "hypothesis". By definition a theory must be tested in some way, if it hasn't it's a hypothesis.
0:30 - Supermassive black holes don't 'literally hold galaxies together'. Unlike the sun in the middle of our solar system, which keeps our local planets 'anchored' in stable local orbits, the effects of gravity drop off significantly at the distances that occur between stars in a galaxy, and that gravitational 'exertion' is not nearly enough to keep a galaxy together. This is one of the factors that is the basis for the search for 'dark matter', as an explanation for why galaxy sized structures move cohesively and maintain relative position, because the gravity of the known mass doesn't have force effect to explain this, or come even close to it, at galaxy scale distances. It's worth remembering that while our sun's mass constitutes 98 percent of the total mass in our solar system, which explains its oppressive effect on the rest of our local planetary masses, even the largest supermassive black holes we know of, that are vast single stellar bodies dwarfing everything else, are still only a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percent of the total mass in their galaxy's combined mass, so that differential combined with the significantly longer distances between objects in a galaxy, mean it has very little gravitational effect on the stars not immediately adjacent to them. 13:20 - Okay, this makes no sense. If 'dark stars' are in fact visible, because, as stated earlier in this video, they excite surrounding 'normal' matter to such a degree that they actually outshine whole galaxies, wouldn't that then mean that we'd be able to easily determine if dark stars were forming or active in a region in our own galaxy, because, well, they would be shining with a luminosity of a billion stars? I mean, that would be an indicator so obvious to measure, that it would be practically visible to the naked eye, let alone to precision instruments designed to measure such variables.
I understood your second concern as "maybe these aren't stars, they're more like tiny sparks of dark matter." But he does use the word star several times. There's a number of grammatical concerns I have even without the massively misleading title.
God holds us in his right hand God is bigger than our universe He created all things .. each solar system came into being through black holes by the power of God
it’s amusing to think that while we’re searching for extraterrestrial life, some channels are just trying to find life in their view counts! “You Won’t Believe What NASA Found on Mars!” might as well be followed by “Spoiler: It’s Just a Rock!” equally terrifying..
It once was thought it must be God. When scientist would reach a point they can't figure out. I assume we'll figure it out before 2050... Least I hope.
9:03 The galaxies were bright because of a thing called black hole stars these “stars” their size were not controlled by gravity so it had no gravitational barrier to stop them from growing even after the star goes supernova and a black hole is supposed to take its place it still grows so a black hole is inside this star and it’s growing and decreasing every day they shine brighter than any other star in the whole world I remind you this was in the early universe so maybe it’s not dark matter that created black holes it might be these stars as maybe it didn’t have the hydrogen to sustain its nuclear fusion so the black hole gained power and became super massive because these stars were like none after.We still don’t know how these stars died so that’s just a theory a Space theory thanks for reading.
0:28 "Their unfathomable gravitational pull literally holds galaxies together." Um, no. The two masses can have a correlation, but the galaxy almost always outweighs the central SMB (in the Milky Way) by a large factor. The SMB Sagittarius A* being only 0.00037 *percent* of the Milky Way's total mass.
You forgot to mention that the combined gravity from the galaxy and the SMB is still not enough to hold the galaxy together... this is where the idea of dark matter comes from. It's the final piece needed to hold galaxies together
Fringe cases aside, the fact is that supermassive black holes are not the thing holding the vast majority of observed galaxies together. I had to stop 30 seconds into the video to come down to the comments, hoping there was a small community gathered that knows how galaxies work. I'm glad I made it here😊
UA-cam needs its own community notes style fact checking for videos. Who knows how many people who watched this actually bothered going to the comments.
There's a problem with your train of thought ... Thoughty2. The reason that exceptionally large stars will collapse down into black holes is because the accumulation of iron building up in the cores of these large stars also build up gravitational force inside the core. For those who are not big into astrophysics every fusion reaction upto iron produces more energy than the reaction consumes. When you try to fuse iron it takes energy from the system so it's basically the end of the line as far as star fusion goes. Now as the core gets larger and larger it will eventually reach a point where the gravity of the core exceeds two specific pressure points. If the gravitational force exceeds electron degeneracy pressure then the electrons of atoms get forced into the nucleus and you end up with a neutron star. However, if the gravitational force builds fast enough and it also exceeds neutron degeneracy pressure then the neutrons in the core get ripped apart and the entire thing collapses down into a black hole. In your example of dark stars undergoing WIMP annihilation there is energy produced but there isn't a concentration of mass. So the is no gravitational build up. So a black hole won't form because there isn't a way for matter (or dark matter) to exceed neutron degeneracy pressure and collapse. I don't argue that dark stars couldn't exist. I'm just saying that the mechanism you described isn't going to compress matter to the point it will collapse down on itself. So if these 'dark stars' behave according to how you describe them then they are not the source of supermassive black holes.
Q. Re gas cloud collapse, the video stated that for the gas cloud to collapse it needed to cool, this struck me as odd. Surely, yes to a point a cooling gas will 'collapse' until gravity takes over & then on it's collapsing it's getting hotter due to being compressed & friction. I also don't understand why stars are not all relatively similar sized initially as they presumably all achieve fusion at similar conditions then blow off excess gas so how do high mass stars exist.
The type of Star that always scared me was the hypothetical “zombie” stars that might have existed in the early universe. Stars whose insides became black holes, but the outer parts were large enough and were sustained by the heat generated by the inner black holes accretion disc to actually stay alive for a while. It’s scary to think how the star would appear normal but was hiding a monster inside in place of its core.
I've missed you man, you were the one who led me to enjoy space related stuff during my high school days. It's been a while and you suddenly popped up again in my algorithm. Love your videos!
0:29 - Black holes do NOT hold galaxies together. Even if a black hole is one billion solar masses, the Milky Way galaxy (and many others) have an average of 100-200 billion stars across 100,000 light years. No black hole that we know of actually keeps more than a few stars in orbit around it, and certainly not anywhere near a whole galaxy. The reason a galaxy appears to rotate about is center is because the center is so densely packed with celestial object, the galaxy's center of gravity is very close to the center of the galaxy. The individual objects in each galaxy revolve around the center of gravity of the system (with the presence of dark matter/energy).
@@thefacelessone74 no...although also kind of yes...depending on what you mean exactly...the galaxy is held together by the cumulative effect of all the mass within it, with the black hole happening to be at the center of that mass, likely forming due to the high density of matter
@b3n5-ck7fs supermassive blackholes are the central mass. That's just a fact. How much their gravity holds the galaxy together idk the math on that man it's probably not even accurate.
@@b3n5-ck7fs indeed, that's what they said. the initial starts are held in place by the black hole. The overall gravitational affect is brought about by the slow collection of stellar objects and the mass those onjects add to the whole system rather than the black hole being the gravitational center.
I am NOT knocking scientists, but it amazes me how confidently and absolutely *some* speak when - to no fault of their own, really - they ARE simply presenting assumptions and guesses [rather than simply saying, "Well, based on we think we know, this is our best hypothesis right now"].
Those are the ones that pop science programs/articles love to quote. science journalism doesn't like measured language and caveats, they want "WOW THE GOD PARTICLE"
Bear in mind we're not listening directly to the scientists who are researching this topic, rather we're getting this information second, third, maybe fourth-hand and with every iteration, the new conveyor of that information puts their own spin on it. I imagine the scientists on this project are more like, "Well, we found this interesting bit of data. We're not sure what exactly what it is, but we hypothesize this, this, this, or this...." but when we get that information, it suddenly becomes, "Scientists believe they've discovered Dark Stars!!!!!" It's a journalism thing.
@@thatjeff7550 As an environmental engineer I am trained to translate scientific findings into practical application and so I know one should always look into the original source, but alas, most people do not. I get so sick and tired of MSM doing exactly this "journalism thing" when it comes to their climate indoctrination scheme.
I'm surprised this team isn't expanding on their idea and suggesting that all black holes are or began as dark stars. If their idea is that these stars would be invisible and very tightly compacted, but would be able to heat up the gases surrounding them, that matches black holes. When no gas surrounds them, they are invisible and their presence is only indicated with gravitational effects. Like with the SMBH Sag A* - S2 was one of the main stars that proved there was a supermassive object at the center of the galaxy. The time lapses are really telling. At the time, Sag A* was invisible as it didn't have an accretion disc around it. Edit: a typo
@@Katharoni exactly. If it were discovered, like the title said, it wouldn’t be a theory. It would have been found and proven-and that MIGHT be terrifying…I don’t know after wasting my time with this video.
@@prufrock1977 well to be fair, gravity, evolution and relativity are all still called theories despite being very well established as universal facts, mostly because our understanding of them still develops over time, but I grt what you mean.
@prufrock1977 Its important to understand what "theory" means in relation to science: "A well-established explanation for natural phenomenon, supported by a large body of evidence from repeated testing and observation" This is almost the opposite of what theory means *outside* of scientific purposes. It's important to understand the difference in usage, as that's specifically how many grifters and conspiracy theorists fool others - equating any of their own "theories" as equal to a scientific theory. Im sure you can see the dangers there. Have a great weekend!
That bit about supermassive black holes holding galaxies together is almost certainly not true. the mainstream view is that dark matter is what actually holds galaxies together. Even if you aren't convinced by that, supermassive black holes are typically not massive enough relative to their host galaxies to play the role implied here.
and they feed upon the stars that get too close - spewing out (recycling) & regurgitating the excess back out into the universe. It's just one big recycling plant really.
I am positive you have been following England right? I am sure you know of William the Conqueror in the Norman dynasty? So next time you wave your flag, understand *that* is your black hole.
"Black" or secret projects. A government isn't going to put, "black projects" or "black operations" in the budget or list them in expenses, they get buried. That's why people find things like $50k hammers or £30k screwdrivers. Or it was just embezzled. Simple 🙂
@dmo848 Drivers pay approximately 30% of the cost of building, maintaining and policing our roads. They pay nothing towards the massive health care costs of pollution and sedentary lifestyles. In many jurisdictions they pay nothing toward the massive cost of climate change they cause. You're getting a free ride. That explains where a lot of your tax dollars go.
(Lyrics) Ooh baby, don't you know I suffer? Ooh baby, can you hear me moan? You caught me under false pretenses How long before you let me go? Ooh You set my soul alight Ooh You set my soul alight Glaciers melting in the dead of night (ooh) And the superstars sucked into the supermassive (you set my soul alight) Glaciers melting in the dead of night And the superstars sucked into the (you set my soul) (Into the supermassive) I thought I was a fool for no one Ooh baby, I'm a fool for you You're the queen of the superficial And how long before you tell the truth? Ooh You set my soul alight Ooh You set my soul alight Glaciers melting in the dead of night (ooh) And the superstars sucked into the supermassive (you set my soul alight) Glaciers melting in the dead of night And the superstars sucked into the (you set my soul) (Into the supermassive) Supermassive black hole Supermassive black hole Supermassive black hole Supermassive black hole Glaciers melting in the dead of night And the superstars sucked into the supermassive Glaciers melting in the dead of night And the superstars sucked into the supermassive Glaciers melting in the dead of night (ooh) And the superstars sucked into the supermassive (you set my soul alight) Glaciers melting in the dead of night And the superstars sucked into the (you set my soul) (Into the supermassive) Supermassive black hole Supermassive black hole Supermassive black hole Supermassive black hole (Muse)
I just saw this in my recommended, the last time I watched one of your videos was around was 8 years ago when I was around 12-13 years old. You were one of the biggest reasons I fell in love with science.
Dark stars don't exsist, The composition of elements where different in the early universe. So the amount of hydrogen and Helium was different, it also meant they where massive and the amount of energy they could generate is probably also no longer very common, So these early stars if clustered together could create very large blackholes surrounded by other corpses of supernova, and when they merged they probably created SMBH, with enough stellar gas surrounding it, that is probably how early galaxies where formed as well.
Well I'm glad we have such an esteemed astrophysicist here to clear that up in a UA-cam comment section. Who knew all those other scientists could be so wrong.
You always present your videos with passion and attention, but i really love it when they are space videos! It just the way you speak you can tell you are really into the mystery of it all
I'm still undecided on whether Dark Matter truly exists or not. Dark matter has never been observed. There is strong evidence for it to account for gravitational observations, but we could just need better equations for gravity on galaxy wide scales. It makes sense to me for it to exist, but without observing it, I don't like just assuming it exists.
My thoughts exactly....its all gravity, they always talk about the Great Attractor, what about the infinite amount of galaxies/black holes/and matter way out there pulling everything.....
Well, they do, and we know a thing or two about it. You can calculate the mass that it practically swallowed by changes in its Schwarzschild radius accordingly. Stuff that goes in will also shortly burst out Roentgen radiation before it finally disappears beyond the event horizon, that's the dying scream of matter, so to say.
0:28 Random mistake here, supermassive black holes don't hold galaxies together, their mass is usually tiny compared to all the stars. Haven't watched the rest of the video to look for more mistakes, a simple one like that at the beginning is damning.
The title should have given it away tbh lol. Really finding a new type of star that is "terrifying" would be something you'd hear about from more than just this dumbass. Hence, he talks about nothing related to the title for the first 5m lol
but iw wouldnt hold this channel to any sort of respectable "science knowledge" in the first place, this youtube content creator is not a phd in astronomy or even an astrophysicst student. they are just making money on youtube
You know, it's also quite strange how the black holes are in the center of a galaxy, because, the effect of gravity falls off over distance, if you're far away enough, and are moving away, even if you and that object were the only 2 things in the universe, you wouldn't eventually come back to it. Hmnn... what was I talking about again?...
Just a thought. It's very possible that there is nothing out there, because we can only see the past. If we were to travel 4.5 billion light years away, we could then look at the birth of our planet.
I saw Muse live in 2002 with 2 support bands for £15. Origin of Symmetry tour. I got a backstage pass during it. Went backstage. Was told Matt Bellamy was too wasted to come backstage though, and was passed out on the tour bus. I drank one free can of beer, then went home..
I like how the second "i" in "Visible" at 2:42 is edited in over the "a" of "Visable". Such a small thing but it looked so weird and stood out so much, that i couldn't concentrate on anything he said.
Hey, Thoughty2 - I turn 42 tomorrow! I've watched you since the original RIF videos, and still get a little jolt of dopamine when I see you're posted something. Cheers from the Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA!
Mrs Richards: "I paid for a room with a view !" Basil: (pointing to the lovely view) "That is Torquay, Madam ." Mrs Richards: "It's not good enough!" Basil: "May I ask what you were expecting to see out of a Torquay hotel bedroom window ? Sydney Opera House, perhaps? the Hanging Gardens of Babylon? Herds of wildebeest sweeping majestically across the plains?..." Mrs Richards: "Don't be silly! I expect to be able to see the sea!" Basil: "You can see the sea, it's over there between the land and the sky." Mrs Richards: "I'm not satisfied. But I shall stay. But I expect a reduction." Basil: "Why?! Because Krakatoa's not erupting at the moment ?"
Thought2! How do I give you details of a mystery that needs solving? There is a street in a town called Knutsford and the houses number from 40 - 44 missing the number…42!! No one seems to know why, not even the council. Could you please find out? I am a huge fan by the way!! Xxxxx
But are invisible still. So are they black holes then with extreme gravitational masses releasing constant energy exciting the matter maybe that is the exact reason for galaxies speeding up and getting tighter unproportionally
This is definitely a theory, this could also be a black hole or something else, but the fact that a dark star can be the brightest thing in existence is crazy. It's still too strange, so "to be configured" is where it belongs right now.
I remember reading about the possible existence of dark stars about 30 years ago, so I seriously doubt those three people first came up with that theory.
This is the first video I've watched from you, but I had to verify this wasn't ai, cause your voice is just amazing. I have a pretty deep voice, but yours is so smooth and clear.
Not quite. Antimatter and matter colliding annihilates the other, but antimatter is fine with itself the same as any lump of random matter. WIMPs annihilate each other. The result is almost identical but the difference is worth mentioning. By this model, a dark matter reactor is fueled only by dark matter. An antimatter reactor needs antimatter and some other form of matter (it doesn't really matter what it is) to annihilate. Both would have HUGE energy output, but theoretically a dark matter reactor would be significantly easier to find fuel for. Right now we have to make antimatter synthetically, which takes significant energy to do. Unless I'm mistaken, we haven't observed antimatter in large, naturally occurring quantities as of yet either.
@@Seqan01 we haven't observed antimatter in large, naturally occurring quantities as of yet becauase we can't yet reach the dilithium mines on Rura Pente. But we can't yet reach the dilithium mines on Rura Pente because we don't yet have large enough quantities of antimatter to power our warp drives. Its a quantum quandary.
Black holes aren't dark matter because they're made of regular matter that's been compressed way beyond anything we can normally imagine. Like if the Moon suddenly turned into a black hole, it would shrink to just 0.22 millimeters in diameter, but it would still be the same Moon - just squished down to an insane level. That’s why its gravity is so strong. Think of it like this: Moon turns into a black hole -> now it's 0.22 millimeters in diameter but with the same mass as the Moon, except now all that gravity is focused in that tiny space, making it way more intense. Dark matter, though, is something totally different. We can’t see it, and it doesn’t act like normal matter - it only shows up through its gravity. Black holes are still regular matter, just super dense, and we can actually detect them by how they mess with light and stuff around them. The light gets warped around the black hole because of its intense gravity, and the event horizon is the point of no return where nothing, not even light, can escape.
@@hobowithawaterpistol9070it’s true, dark matter acts very differently to black holes. Dark matter is practically everywhere, and adds to the gravity balance needed to keep galaxies together otherwise things would fly apart. Like spinning on a roundabouts super fast. Your body wants to fly off of it.
Here's a thought to consider - because photons travel at the speed of light, time and distance do not exist for them. That means from the perspective of a photon, the moment one is created it instantly hits something and is adsorbed regardless of how far or long it's traveled. That's relativity for you. Also consider that on beaches all over the world there are naked, sweaty Germans looking like large, pink, semi-deflated and wrinkly balloons, covered in lint. Ruining the experience for EVERYONE ELSE, including many photons who's only existence is: Sun->Sweaty German arse... or worse!
Leave the Germans alone! They've had a pretty rough time over the last century or so, and need a bit of break from being criticized, especially with respect to their skin colour and levels of sweatiness.
I just love how "science" can sometimes make up stories (theories) and sort of run with it and cement it until it somewhat becomes truth that everyone runs with...am talking about the origin of virtually everything. "We don't understand how supermassive blackholes form but we know that enormous cloud of primordial gas, where hydrogen and helium were commonplace...when these collapse, they normally form starts. But..." That sounds pretty cool if you think about it BUT...I mean truthfully, what makes that different from mythical stories?
I have a hypothesis that dark matter can be explained with an antimatter distribution in the core of stellar objects. It anhilated instantly, the gamma rays form a k-ring mostly, the energy still atributes to gravity, but the energy thresholds determine that the observable anhillation energy past the surface of the sun shifts below plank values. So we have all the variables to balance and distribute, and figuring out the process by which the gamma rays are confined can help with figuring out cold fusion. Possibly qgp
Has anyone ever questioned if the Big Bang was the start of our galaxy and not the start of the universe? Since you said a huge amount of energy would be required to make it?
I still like the idea that dark matter/energy comes from the big bang where positive matter and anti-matter collided creating two flows of time. Our positive universe has a bit of the positive matter that avoided the anti-matter, being pushed away with half of the dark matter by the reaction of the explosion, with the remaining bits of anti-matter that avoided the positive matter are pushed in the opposite direction.
As you rightly pointed out, the gravitational force from visible matter alone isn’t enough to explain how galaxies maintain their structure. This is precisely why scientists propose the existence of dark matter, an invisible substance providing the extra gravitational force needed to hold galaxies together.
Patterns and repetitions in nature are key to understanding black holes. Whether you think they are whirls around a collider, like a tornado, or a dark star, like a gas giant that is no longer a star but a plantery system; black holes are compacted either by low pressure or a gaint dark existence, or both and with a portal to something like a plank's constant of mega gravity! Almost like Saturn's belt, further the drum orbital seen like a light beam from the centre of darkness; the 'higgs boson' remains a strange portal between subatomic magnetism and neutrons of matter. The first two orbitals are locked, you cannot add to their event horizon! Can you only attract dark matter sometimes, or gas giants, then other asteroid belts!
Black holes are not stars but collapsars. They are in a similar classification as neutron stars (pulsars and magnetars) and white dwarfs. Stars (in their cores or shell burning, like Betetguese), fuse the nucleii of lighter elements to heavier elements, like hydrogen to helium (as in the core of the sun) .
Supermassive black holes doesn't hold galaxies togheter. It's a common misconception, but the actual range where their gravitational pull is significant is very, very small compared to the radius of a galaxy.
If we're trying to learn more about Dark Matter and Energy we need to stop putting all the focus on gravitational waves. Electromagnetic waves are just as powerful if not more powerful than gravity. Electromagnetism can be Sooooooooooooo powerful it rips the Iron(Fe, 26) from our blood though the skin and all. If our basis is this matter and energy is responsible for the increased acceleration of the Universe Like Electromagnetic poles fits that bill better than gravity.
There's also no reason to assume that there is only one type of dark matter. Some types might be some that strongly interacting with other dark matter types that are either weak against us or non interacting entirely. There could be an entire cosmology that doesn't directly interact with us.
Galaxies, even our's spin solely because of the gravitational & electromagnetic waves moving around Sagittarius-A Star are Sooooooooooooo powerful they pull the rest of the galaxy around them. Without Sagittarius-A Star our galaxy wouldn't spin and we wouldn't be possible. These thangs are scary but also we should love and respect these bodies. They give our Sun and Solar System that energy & The Sun takes 90% of that and channels it to us. Hey, we're monster big fish too. We redistribute the energy to our Luna. Every movement is based on the gravitational and electromagnetic waves of a bigger body. Sooooooooooooo you see energy isn't created or destroyed. When you burn a piece of paper you don't create the energy. You used heat to make fuel and Oxygen(O, 8) change its energy state. The burning releases photons, heat and other stuff Sooooooooooooo the energy is changed, not destroyed. And the matter is easier. Sooooooooooooo when you burn the paper, the paper changes to ash and gasses. The matter is not destroyed its just changed it's physical state.
"Picture an early universe filled with these colossal invisible stars..."
Um, I can't.
"Picture an early universe filled with colossal chains of whales and petunias endlessly circling each other in intricate patterns ... also invisible."
wait i’m confused i thought the reactions between dark matter cause large amounts of light so wouldn’t the stars be visible
bro just said can you see a ghost?
Try.
@@CannibalMukbang if you can picture invisible things than you aren't picturing invisible things
Before it gets renamed:
We've just found a new type of star and it's terrifying
lol
fr
Get a life
43 minutes in and it's still called that
Thanks, needed this. Only noticed later on that all the titles changed an hour or two later from release.
"We just found a new type of star" "The concept of dark stars is mere speculation"... So we HAVEN'T found a new type of star 👀
Thanks
Scientist, "We don't know what it is,
but we can detect it."
"So we are going to call it this new thing,
and say that it is still science, yay."
Ok, get outtta Dodge with this stuff, seriously?
The song Black Star by Lustmord is more believable at this point.
@@RunToEternity They can't even detect dark matter. The spiral arms of galaxies rotate faster than they should according to the current understanding of gravity, so scientists theorized a new type of matter that doesn't interact with electromagnetic energy, but still has mass, to account for the extra gravity needed for the spiral arm rotation velocity. It is inductive logic, which is fine, but it isn't testable yet. People talk about dark matter as if it has been proven real, and I haven't seen anything to suggest that. Maybe it is, or maybe the theory of gravity is wrong at that scale, much like Einstein improved on Newton's theory. I don't think scientists like to admit that as a possibility.
Dark matter can be glimpsed in what we know as the void, but truly observed in the true void or space between Galaxies. Thats why its very hard to prove. As we do the information changes, needing new proof again. Super massive black holes are just a collection and massing of dark stars that eventually do form what can be considered a singularity, or a natural galactic recycling machine. Dark stars are just collapsed stars that had the right mass and chemistry to form something even denser than a neutron star. Personally im not sure dark matter, dark stars, and black holes are even correlated but understanding all three and how theyre related would answer questions beyond mans current scope.
Yeah this is exactly what I wanted to comment. Sick of the clickbait bullshit titles. Thoughty2 has become a typical loser on UA-cam.
The human knowledge about Dark Matter is like ants not knowing that there's superheated plasma behind a glass bulb near them, that there's molten lava beneath them, that there's large oceans surrounding huge landmasses far far away from their humble mounds, that there's a huge ball of plasma giving energy to every life on a planet they're living in... and that there's giant creatures walking by near them not knowing and not seeing that could one day step on their tiny bodies.
Giant creatures?
This.... Lmao stay gold buddy
@@She-Jinpingthat's us and, probably, other animals
People
You alright?@@She-Jinping
So basically, we really don’t know squat about the universe.
Yep. We really don't know much beyond apples and gravity. Ask a quantum physicist what we know about the quantum world, they'll tell you we know very little. We might know what we don't know, which is a great start, but we truly, honestly, and demonstrably know very little in regards.to the very big and the very little.
I do, but I wouldn’t solve Nobel prize worthy shit for my undergrad or a phd to be able to claim an appeal to authority; but they might just give me an honorary degree yet 🥱🧐🤣
Exactly. We just be guessing yo.
Pretty much
We are learning new information about the universe by leaps and bounds , though relatively we know very little . We know a lot more than we did just a few decades ago .
“Hey, 42 here.”
Well it is the answer to everything
Literally how I hear it
@@Kweerdaddy because thats what he's saying.
@@ChronoSonder36Why would he say 42? He’s saying Thoughty2 it’s just his accent
@@Toaster-of_random veritasium
"This idea, while still speculative" is a far cry from "found a new type of star"
Yeah, and I don't know why they would be "terrifying" anyway.
Science is speculative.
@@jimmcdougall9973Science fundamentally is observational. It grinds my gears when people don't actually understand what science and the scientific method are.
@@jimmcdougall9973
Replace that last "theory" in your comment with "hypothesis". By definition a theory must be tested in some way, if it hasn't it's a hypothesis.
@@jimmcdougall9973 My dad works for Nintendo and he said NASA is gay
10:27 lol the scientific community looks at 6-18 pixels and says it doesn’t have the swirly features of a galaxy
0:12 - "..MUSED upon supermassive black holes" hahah that was a good one
I thought I was the only one ancient enough to get that reference 😂
@@himwiththehair8118 You must be older than me(63), that went straight over my head.😕
@@Al8miniumwhoosh
Glad I'm not the only one who caught that!
For those wondering Muse is a band that made the song "supermassive black hole" they got a lot of good music you should look it up.
0:30 - Supermassive black holes don't 'literally hold galaxies together'. Unlike the sun in the middle of our solar system, which keeps our local planets 'anchored' in stable local orbits, the effects of gravity drop off significantly at the distances that occur between stars in a galaxy, and that gravitational 'exertion' is not nearly enough to keep a galaxy together. This is one of the factors that is the basis for the search for 'dark matter', as an explanation for why galaxy sized structures move cohesively and maintain relative position, because the gravity of the known mass doesn't have force effect to explain this, or come even close to it, at galaxy scale distances.
It's worth remembering that while our sun's mass constitutes 98 percent of the total mass in our solar system, which explains its oppressive effect on the rest of our local planetary masses, even the largest supermassive black holes we know of, that are vast single stellar bodies dwarfing everything else, are still only a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percent of the total mass in their galaxy's combined mass, so that differential combined with the significantly longer distances between objects in a galaxy, mean it has very little gravitational effect on the stars not immediately adjacent to them.
13:20 - Okay, this makes no sense. If 'dark stars' are in fact visible, because, as stated earlier in this video, they excite surrounding 'normal' matter to such a degree that they actually outshine whole galaxies, wouldn't that then mean that we'd be able to easily determine if dark stars were forming or active in a region in our own galaxy, because, well, they would be shining with a luminosity of a billion stars? I mean, that would be an indicator so obvious to measure, that it would be practically visible to the naked eye, let alone to precision instruments designed to measure such variables.
Yapatraon
I understood your second concern as "maybe these aren't stars, they're more like tiny sparks of dark matter."
But he does use the word star several times. There's a number of grammatical concerns I have even without the massively misleading title.
@@Apeboy782 not his fault ur a dipshit lmfao
God holds us in his right hand
God is bigger than our universe
He created all things .. each solar system came into being through black holes by the power of God
@@LarryFain-y9w For you, that means something, for me, it means nothing. A fool saying foolish things.
4:46 to skip the sponsor read
Lmao found this while scrolling perfect timing thanks
Thanks
Thank you kind sir
Muah
Brilliant
it’s amusing to think that while we’re searching for extraterrestrial life, some channels are just trying to find life in their view counts! “You Won’t Believe What NASA Found on Mars!” might as well be followed by “Spoiler: It’s Just a Rock!” equally terrifying..
It seems like for every problem we encounter in space scientists are like : "Ah! Dark Matter" 😅
Or a bunch of strings
It really does feel like a cop out some days
Same with "Nano technology" in movies?
It once was thought it must be God. When scientist would reach a point they can't figure out. I assume we'll figure it out before 2050... Least I hope.
@@vampr20ranger don't hold your breathe, humans only have 5 senses as the basis to understand existence
“We think we found a new type of star. It’s terrifying and I have a weird sex thing for a telescope”
weirdo
@@LXGHTMANE_ew
LMAOOOO
what do you mean by that???
Well that's a new sentence
Bro. Stop calling a telescope sexy.
You’re gonna invent a new R34
my magnification is bigger.
Sims have been woohooing in backyard observatories since forever. Telescopes are already sexy.
Don't challenge them. You know you can't win😂
@@LisSolitudinousah yes commenting three times
@@EdgarCheung-jt7xk that's a common problem with YT...I didn't even know it commented 3 times, until you replied xD
9:03 The galaxies were bright because of a thing called black hole stars these “stars” their size were not controlled by gravity so it had no gravitational barrier to stop them from growing even after the star goes supernova and a black hole is supposed to take its place it still grows so a black hole is inside this star and it’s growing and decreasing every day they shine brighter than any other star in the whole world I remind you this was in the early universe so maybe it’s not dark matter that created black holes it might be these stars as maybe it didn’t have the hydrogen to sustain its nuclear fusion so the black hole gained power and became super massive because these stars were like none after.We still don’t know how these stars died so that’s just a theory a Space theory thanks for reading.
0:28 "Their unfathomable gravitational pull literally holds galaxies together."
Um, no. The two masses can have a correlation, but the galaxy almost always outweighs the central SMB (in the Milky Way) by a large factor. The SMB Sagittarius A* being only 0.00037 *percent* of the Milky Way's total mass.
Correct, it is even speculated that dark matter holds galaxies together like a sort of cosmic superglue.
You forgot to mention that the combined gravity from the galaxy and the SMB is still not enough to hold the galaxy together... this is where the idea of dark matter comes from. It's the final piece needed to hold galaxies together
it does help a bit near the center tho (some elliptical galaxies are held together by a central black hole if it is small enough)
Fringe cases aside, the fact is that supermassive black holes are not the thing holding the vast majority of observed galaxies together. I had to stop 30 seconds into the video to come down to the comments, hoping there was a small community gathered that knows how galaxies work. I'm glad I made it here😊
UA-cam needs its own community notes style fact checking for videos. Who knows how many people who watched this actually bothered going to the comments.
There's a problem with your train of thought ... Thoughty2. The reason that exceptionally large stars will collapse down into black holes is because the accumulation of iron building up in the cores of these large stars also build up gravitational force inside the core. For those who are not big into astrophysics every fusion reaction upto iron produces more energy than the reaction consumes. When you try to fuse iron it takes energy from the system so it's basically the end of the line as far as star fusion goes.
Now as the core gets larger and larger it will eventually reach a point where the gravity of the core exceeds two specific pressure points. If the gravitational force exceeds electron degeneracy pressure then the electrons of atoms get forced into the nucleus and you end up with a neutron star. However, if the gravitational force builds fast enough and it also exceeds neutron degeneracy pressure then the neutrons in the core get ripped apart and the entire thing collapses down into a black hole.
In your example of dark stars undergoing WIMP annihilation there is energy produced but there isn't a concentration of mass. So the is no gravitational build up. So a black hole won't form because there isn't a way for matter (or dark matter) to exceed neutron degeneracy pressure and collapse. I don't argue that dark stars couldn't exist. I'm just saying that the mechanism you described isn't going to compress matter to the point it will collapse down on itself. So if these 'dark stars' behave according to how you describe them then they are not the source of supermassive black holes.
you have the best description, but I'm no expert
He is no scientist, making these types of videos with scraps in terms of knowledge, just for money.
When I fart it forces neutrons into electrons and sparks like lightning ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
so the annihilation is not generating anything that could count towards building mass? .. really wimpy..
Q. Re gas cloud collapse, the video stated that for the gas cloud to collapse it needed to cool, this struck me as odd. Surely, yes to a point a cooling gas will 'collapse' until gravity takes over & then on it's collapsing it's getting hotter due to being compressed & friction.
I also don't understand why stars are not all relatively similar sized initially as they presumably all achieve fusion at similar conditions then blow off excess gas so how do high mass stars exist.
The type of Star that always scared me was the hypothetical “zombie” stars that might have existed in the early universe. Stars whose insides became black holes, but the outer parts were large enough and were sustained by the heat generated by the inner black holes accretion disc to actually stay alive for a while. It’s scary to think how the star would appear normal but was hiding a monster inside in place of its core.
Oh god imagine if our Sun turned out to be one
@@bwayagnes not possible.
Stars by themselves are no less monsters, if we think about it - a gargantuan place with nuclear fusion explosions every where.
I've missed you man, you were the one who led me to enjoy space related stuff during my high school days. It's been a while and you suddenly popped up again in my algorithm. Love your videos!
0:29 - Black holes do NOT hold galaxies together. Even if a black hole is one billion solar masses, the Milky Way galaxy (and many others) have an average of 100-200 billion stars across 100,000 light years. No black hole that we know of actually keeps more than a few stars in orbit around it, and certainly not anywhere near a whole galaxy. The reason a galaxy appears to rotate about is center is because the center is so densely packed with celestial object, the galaxy's center of gravity is very close to the center of the galaxy. The individual objects in each galaxy revolve around the center of gravity of the system (with the presence of dark matter/energy).
yeah they do its like a chain reaction... ( ( ( ( ) ) ) )
@@thefacelessone74 no...although also kind of yes...depending on what you mean exactly...the galaxy is held together by the cumulative effect of all the mass within it, with the black hole happening to be at the center of that mass, likely forming due to the high density of matter
Maybe. But I appreciate your confidence.
@b3n5-ck7fs supermassive blackholes are the central mass. That's just a fact. How much their gravity holds the galaxy together idk the math on that man it's probably not even accurate.
@@b3n5-ck7fs indeed, that's what they said.
the initial starts are held in place by the black hole. The overall gravitational affect is brought about by the slow collection of stellar objects and the mass those onjects add to the whole system rather than the black hole being the gravitational center.
I am NOT knocking scientists, but it amazes me how confidently and absolutely *some* speak when - to no fault of their own, really - they ARE simply presenting assumptions and guesses [rather than simply saying, "Well, based on we think we know, this is our best hypothesis right now"].
Those are the ones that pop science programs/articles love to quote. science journalism doesn't like measured language and caveats, they want "WOW THE GOD PARTICLE"
Bear in mind we're not listening directly to the scientists who are researching this topic, rather we're getting this information second, third, maybe fourth-hand and with every iteration, the new conveyor of that information puts their own spin on it. I imagine the scientists on this project are more like, "Well, we found this interesting bit of data. We're not sure what exactly what it is, but we hypothesize this, this, this, or this...." but when we get that information, it suddenly becomes, "Scientists believe they've discovered Dark Stars!!!!!" It's a journalism thing.
@@thatjeff7550 It is not just a [journalism thing], look carefully at the public statements of these scientists.
@hillstrong715 can't you and @thatjeff7550 both be right on that subject? I mean both Journalists and Scientists do those sort of thing.
@@thatjeff7550 As an environmental engineer I am trained to translate scientific findings into practical application and so I know one should always look into the original source, but alas, most people do not.
I get so sick and tired of MSM doing exactly this "journalism thing" when it comes to their climate indoctrination scheme.
"When WIMPs Collide" could be the title of a 1950s science fiction movie.
Or a news story of two nerd gangs in Silicone Valley about to pull slide rules on each other.🤣
Or the name of a hit song from a powerman 5000 cover band
“Willie the wimp and his Cadillac coffin!”
Or to illustrate the difference of "When Two Tribes Go To War"
@@tinkerstrade3553 Surely this is about nerds at CERN.
I'm surprised this team isn't expanding on their idea and suggesting that all black holes are or began as dark stars. If their idea is that these stars would be invisible and very tightly compacted, but would be able to heat up the gases surrounding them, that matches black holes. When no gas surrounds them, they are invisible and their presence is only indicated with gravitational effects. Like with the SMBH Sag A* - S2 was one of the main stars that proved there was a supermassive object at the center of the galaxy. The time lapses are really telling. At the time, Sag A* was invisible as it didn't have an accretion disc around it.
Edit: a typo
0:34 you thought we wouldn't notice..
I don't get it
@@achannelherebetter stay that innocent, it's fine 😊
It doesn't have to do with innocence, I also don't get it @@AntitheistHuman
Bro is onto nothing 💀
I'm like the dirtiest minded possible and I don't get it
Don't use the word "terrifying" in your captions, all of us have come to associate that with click bait videos that are infesting UA-camd.
This was a clickbait video. There is no evidence being offered.
@prufrock1977 Literally, the title says that this type of star was discovered but it's entirely hypothetical. Shit like this is so god damn annoying
@@Katharoni exactly. If it were discovered, like the title said, it wouldn’t be a theory. It would have been found and proven-and that MIGHT be terrifying…I don’t know after wasting my time with this video.
@@prufrock1977 well to be fair, gravity, evolution and relativity are all still called theories despite being very well established as universal facts, mostly because our understanding of them still develops over time, but I grt what you mean.
@prufrock1977 Its important to understand what "theory" means in relation to science:
"A well-established explanation for natural phenomenon, supported by a large body of evidence from repeated testing and observation"
This is almost the opposite of what theory means *outside* of scientific purposes.
It's important to understand the difference in usage, as that's specifically how many grifters and conspiracy theorists fool others - equating any of their own "theories" as equal to a scientific theory. Im sure you can see the dangers there.
Have a great weekend!
That bit about supermassive black holes holding galaxies together is almost certainly not true. the mainstream view is that dark matter is what actually holds galaxies together. Even if you aren't convinced by that, supermassive black holes are typically not massive enough relative to their host galaxies to play the role implied here.
NASA has secretly been traveling in and out of black homes for years! That’s how we got Super glue!
and they feed upon the stars that get too close - spewing out (recycling) & regurgitating the excess back out into the universe. It's just one big recycling plant really.
@@tjwright-df2cu Maybe Earth is right in the galaxy’s landfill, and the real Utopia is far, far away!
7:40 for anyone just clicking in
Another unexplained black hole is our Government’s use of our tax money 🤔🇬🇧🙏♥️
I am positive you have been following England right? I am sure you know of William the Conqueror in the Norman dynasty? So next time you wave your flag, understand *that* is your black hole.
"Black" or secret projects. A government isn't going to put, "black projects" or "black operations" in the budget or list them in expenses, they get buried. That's why people find things like $50k hammers or £30k screwdrivers.
Or it was just embezzled.
Simple 🙂
I jus wanna know where the road money goes🤷 or toll booths. Where is that money
Not in your country though 😂
@dmo848 Drivers pay approximately 30% of the cost of building, maintaining and policing our roads. They pay nothing towards the massive health care costs of pollution and sedentary lifestyles. In many jurisdictions they pay nothing toward the massive cost of climate change they cause. You're getting a free ride. That explains where a lot of your tax dollars go.
This guy would make a great school science teacher. "How the bloody hell..." LOL. He's great at adding humour to his videos.
(Lyrics)
Ooh baby, don't you know I suffer?
Ooh baby, can you hear me moan?
You caught me under false pretenses
How long before you let me go?
Ooh
You set my soul alight
Ooh
You set my soul alight
Glaciers melting in the dead of night (ooh)
And the superstars sucked into the supermassive (you set my soul alight)
Glaciers melting in the dead of night
And the superstars sucked into the (you set my soul)
(Into the supermassive)
I thought I was a fool for no one
Ooh baby, I'm a fool for you
You're the queen of the superficial
And how long before you tell the truth?
Ooh
You set my soul alight
Ooh
You set my soul alight
Glaciers melting in the dead of night (ooh)
And the superstars sucked into the supermassive (you set my soul alight)
Glaciers melting in the dead of night
And the superstars sucked into the (you set my soul)
(Into the supermassive)
Supermassive black hole
Supermassive black hole
Supermassive black hole
Supermassive black hole
Glaciers melting in the dead of night
And the superstars sucked into the supermassive
Glaciers melting in the dead of night
And the superstars sucked into the supermassive
Glaciers melting in the dead of night (ooh)
And the superstars sucked into the supermassive (you set my soul alight)
Glaciers melting in the dead of night
And the superstars sucked into the (you set my soul)
(Into the supermassive)
Supermassive black hole
Supermassive black hole
Supermassive black hole
Supermassive black hole
(Muse)
VERy much needed!!
Uh...
Yep glad to see he's on his game, barely a few seconds in and there's the Muse ref! LOL!
LOL you made science nasty :p
someone has WAY too much time on their hands lol
I just saw this in my recommended, the last time I watched one of your videos was around was 8 years ago when I was around 12-13 years old. You were one of the biggest reasons I fell in love with science.
Timestamp 1:02, you should have had Brian May there too.
Dark stars don't exsist, The composition of elements where different in the early universe. So the amount of hydrogen and Helium was different, it also meant they where massive and the amount of energy they could generate is probably also no longer very common, So these early stars if clustered together could create very large blackholes surrounded by other corpses of supernova, and when they merged they probably created SMBH, with enough stellar gas surrounding it, that is probably how early galaxies where formed as well.
Well I'm glad we have such an esteemed astrophysicist here to clear that up in a UA-cam comment section. Who knew all those other scientists could be so wrong.
Grammar please and don't act like that is a fact because it's only theoretical just like all the content of this video.
@@NevG27 I follow other scientific channels as well, this is a theory that is not that unknown...
1 of what feels like millions of models
or maybe they got so big they exploded....seeding the infinite universe with all the materials to form more
Not saying: "Without further Odoo, lets get back to the video" should be a crime.
It’s spelt ADO
100% agree
@@Fryzzi thanks. Unfortunately, I’m a bit of a grammar Nazi
You always present your videos with passion and attention, but i really love it when they are space videos!
It just the way you speak you can tell you are really into the mystery of it all
excuse me what is the last photo from? 14:04
It's called the butterfly nebula. I don't know it's scientific name 😅.
Thanks@@MoughithROUIS
@@MoughithROUIS THANK YOU
NGC 6302
I'm still undecided on whether Dark Matter truly exists or not. Dark matter has never been observed. There is strong evidence for it to account for gravitational observations, but we could just need better equations for gravity on galaxy wide scales. It makes sense to me for it to exist, but without observing it, I don't like just assuming it exists.
Kind of like the “modern audience” and Hollyweird lol
Dark Matter and Dark Energy is just physicists way of saying they have no clue what's going on.
I thought that there was a new theory of an electric universe instead of gravity holding the universe together electrical force is the glue.
When all else fails blame it on the "black guy." LOL 🤣🤣🤣
Dark matter is a placeholder description for a problem that hasn't been solved yet.
Let's call it "Death Star-Class Star", maybe?
I'm down with that.
Yngwie class star. Black Star solo.
I’ll see myself out
Agreed 👍
The problem is the name will not stand the test of time. Black Hole -> Massive BH -> Super Massive BH -> Hyper Massive BH -> Chuck Norris BH.
Well, we do you that it's no moon..😂
What a throw back!!!! I haven’t seen your content in years!!! I’m so glad you’re back in my feed!!
Cool idea: supermassive black holes collect more mass via gravitational pull
You think it's strong enough to pull in our current Democratic hopeful?
@@amylarson3958what
My thoughts exactly....its all gravity, they always talk about the Great Attractor, what about the infinite amount of galaxies/black holes/and matter way out there pulling everything.....
@@amylarson3958 DEMOCRACY?
Well, they do, and we know a thing or two about it. You can calculate the mass that it practically swallowed by changes in its Schwarzschild radius accordingly. Stuff that goes in will also shortly burst out Roentgen radiation before it finally disappears beyond the event horizon, that's the dying scream of matter, so to say.
0:28 Random mistake here, supermassive black holes don't hold galaxies together, their mass is usually tiny compared to all the stars.
Haven't watched the rest of the video to look for more mistakes, a simple one like that at the beginning is damning.
The title should have given it away tbh lol. Really finding a new type of star that is "terrifying" would be something you'd hear about from more than just this dumbass. Hence, he talks about nothing related to the title for the first 5m lol
true!!
but iw wouldnt hold this channel to any sort of respectable "science knowledge" in the first place, this youtube content creator is not a phd in astronomy or even an astrophysicst student. they are just making money on youtube
But they're at the center of galaxies, right?
You know, it's also quite strange how the black holes are in the center of a galaxy, because, the effect of gravity falls off over distance, if you're far away enough, and are moving away, even if you and that object were the only 2 things in the universe, you wouldn't eventually come back to it.
Hmnn... what was I talking about again?...
4:41 I will Odoo that 💀
without further Odoo
Just a thought. It's very possible that there is nothing out there, because we can only see the past. If we were to travel 4.5 billion light years away, we could then look at the birth of our planet.
Muse reference ftw 😎🤘
I'm a metal guy, been to hundreds of concerts.... but Muse live is the best show I've ever seen.
I saw Muse live in 2002 with 2 support bands for £15. Origin of Symmetry tour. I got a backstage pass during it. Went backstage. Was told Matt Bellamy was too wasted to come backstage though, and was passed out on the tour bus. I drank one free can of beer, then went home..
14:33 Also Thanks👍
10:50 I'm dead 😂
The fact we all know this without moving an inch is amazing
Thats what math is for...
I like how the second "i" in "Visible" at 2:42 is edited in over the "a" of "Visable". Such a small thing but it looked so weird and stood out so much, that i couldn't concentrate on anything he said.
Just like the floating 'e' in "Average" over the 'a' of "Avarage" lol. I think it was at 0:34.
Maybe the dark star is the friends we made along the way
Hey, Thoughty2 - I turn 42 tomorrow! I've watched you since the original RIF videos, and still get a little jolt of dopamine when I see you're posted something. Cheers from the Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania, USA!
Happy Birthday 🎉❤
@@missteeshemah580 Thank you... that's nice to hear.
Fun fact: If you were instantly thrown away at the speed of light the day you're born, you would've reached Capella (Alpha Aurigae) star by now.
Love the poconos! Northern Pa is so beautiful and different from southern pa
@@QuestishBen Yeah, had a black bear come up next to me on the porch last week.
I just discovered this Channel and is amazing🤩👍🏻 Thanks for such an extraordinary work!!
Damn, the universe continues and always will continue to amaze us beyond our imagination
Mrs Richards: "I paid for a room with a view !"
Basil: (pointing to the lovely view) "That is Torquay, Madam ."
Mrs Richards: "It's not good enough!"
Basil: "May I ask what you were expecting to see out of a Torquay hotel bedroom window ? Sydney Opera House, perhaps? the Hanging Gardens of Babylon? Herds of wildebeest sweeping majestically across the plains?..."
Mrs Richards: "Don't be silly! I expect to be able to see the sea!"
Basil: "You can see the sea, it's over there between the land and the sky."
Mrs Richards: "I'm not satisfied. But I shall stay. But I expect a reduction."
Basil: "Why?! Because Krakatoa's not erupting at the moment ?"
You have a beautiful ai voice Dr bot
@@Charlie-f4q4o THANKS YOU MUST BE THE VILLAGE IDIOT I'VE HEARD SO MUCH ABOUT IF YOU THINK I'M A BOT OR YOU HEARD A VOICE OF ANY KIND YOU FRIED FISH !
@@Charlie-f4q4o YOU MUST BE THE VILLAGE IDIOT IF YOU THINK I'M A BOT OR YOU HEARD MY VOICE WHILE READING A COMMENT !
@@Charlie-f4q4o YOU MUST BE THE VILLAGE IDIOT IF YOU THINK I'M A BOT OR YOU HEARD MY VOICE WHILE READING A COMMENT !
WELL SAID FRED !YOU MUST BE THE VILLAGE IDIOT IF YOU THINK I'M A BOT OR YOU HEARD MY VOICE WHILE READING A COMMENT !
"that's denser than Amber Heard's dog" 😂😂 00:49
3:00 we know that this thing that we cannot measure or quantify totally makes our math equations work
Thought2! How do I give you details of a mystery that needs solving?
There is a street in a town called Knutsford and the houses number from 40 - 44 missing the number…42!! No one seems to know why, not even the council. Could you please find out?
I am a huge fan by the way!! Xxxxx
They had different team members stick up the house numbers and the one with 2 was off sick that day.
40 took half of 42 and 44 took another half~
Nope, 42 was assigned, to thoughty2 here
@@michaelooi9848 damn that flew over my head 😂😂
The meaning of the Universe
Super massive black holes are created by cops with shotguns.
How did you get off of UA-cam Kids?
@@Smokasaurus Rehab, support groups and love
I’m so confused on how you got to this conclusion
What do dark stars look like? " oh they blisteringly bright and would have outshone a galaxy"
Yea... good choice of name guys very helpful
But are invisible still. So are they black holes then with extreme gravitational masses releasing constant energy exciting the matter maybe that is the exact reason for galaxies speeding up and getting tighter unproportionally
Dark stars were found in the 1970s by Crosby, Still, and Nash.
Just a reminder - David Bowie already made a song about Blackstar 8 years ago 🙂
Radiohead did it in 95
You should also mention that a dog's intellectual abilities are a representation of their owner😂😂😂 0:45
🤢
I'm a cat person but I don't hate dogs, or people who own dogs.
You're just a bad person.
Is that why you're holding a prehistoric hedgehog? They're dumb as soup. :D
😂😂
This is definitely a theory, this could also be a black hole or something else, but the fact that a dark star can be the brightest thing in existence is crazy. It's still too strange, so "to be configured" is where it belongs right now.
0:49
"They are denser than Amber Heard's dog."
Probably based on "My dog stepped on a bee"
😂
😂😂
Crosby, Still and Nash discovered dark stars back in the 1970's.
And they published their work under the title "Suite: Judy Blue Eyes".
what about quasi stars
Yip, a lot of 60's & 70's bands were seeing dark stars - nowt to do with physics....
was that before or after they fried their brains on drugs?
@@bowzerthedog1130 During.
0:49 I just didn't see this coming lol
I'm gonna go with Einstains thought process here:
Q: "Does it make sence?"
A: "Abserlutely not!"
The real star is my father for me..
Fathers are great. Mine just turned 72 today 😃
They sure are. Mine just turned like twelve beer bottles empty today evening.
I'll make sure to tell him that for you
@@Kjubanator -Wine into water?- Your father: Beer into glass.
Is that a rapper?
New Super villain with power over gravity: "My name is Super MAssHole"
Justice League: "Name checks out"
I remember reading about the possible existence of dark stars about 30 years ago, so I seriously doubt those three people first came up with that theory.
A quick search confirms it en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_star_(Newtonian_mechanics)
A dark star was mentioned in the original Star Trek series, I think during the episode, Tomorrow Is Yesterday
This is the first video I've watched from you, but I had to verify this wasn't ai, cause your voice is just amazing. I have a pretty deep voice, but yours is so smooth and clear.
4:20 whats the song
In the 1970s, Crosby, Still, and Nash made the discovery of black stars.
A collective of vibrations in the air that causes what we perceive as music
@@Toaster-of_random what's the music
@@tariffictypist7372 the music is a collection of vibrations
So, dark matter is antimatter?
I want my warp drive dammit! 😂
Dark matter is not antimatter. Antimatter is just matter particles with the opposite charge.
No anti matter is observable and we've created ever so small amounts on earth.
Not quite. Antimatter and matter colliding annihilates the other, but antimatter is fine with itself the same as any lump of random matter.
WIMPs annihilate each other. The result is almost identical but the difference is worth mentioning. By this model, a dark matter reactor is fueled only by dark matter. An antimatter reactor needs antimatter and some other form of matter (it doesn't really matter what it is) to annihilate.
Both would have HUGE energy output, but theoretically a dark matter reactor would be significantly easier to find fuel for. Right now we have to make antimatter synthetically, which takes significant energy to do. Unless I'm mistaken, we haven't observed antimatter in large, naturally occurring quantities as of yet either.
@@Seqan01 we haven't observed antimatter in large, naturally occurring quantities as of yet becauase we can't yet reach the dilithium mines on Rura Pente. But we can't yet reach the dilithium mines on Rura Pente because we don't yet have large enough quantities of antimatter to power our warp drives. Its a quantum quandary.
11:10 - thank you for enabling subtitles. I heard that dark stars are "BRAT" and was very confused. XD
"BRAT"? That's just the WURST
...now I feel like one with mustard & Sauerkraut yum! 😋
Thoughty changed up a lottttt i remember the nerdy looking version 😭 I’ve been MIA for a while this is a nice surprise lol love it 🙌🏾‼️
I love the way you added a picture of propagandist extravagant, Neil deGrasse Tyson. As close-minded in individual as I've ever heard.
what are you talking about? You are a moron lol
how close-minded is he compared to your average flat earther or moon landing denier?
Or your average evangelical Christian? Indeed, the notoriously close-minded Neil Tyson. I have an odd feeling something else is going on here...
Let me guess, you're upset because he denies aliens on earth?
@@TheSlayer117 😉
'Denser than Amber Heards dog" 😂😂😂 Brilliant.
ok so i found 1 person.... that comments this, i dont get someone explain plz lol
Perhaps Black Holes are Dark Matter!
Black holes aren't dark matter because they're made of regular matter that's been compressed way beyond anything we can normally imagine. Like if the Moon suddenly turned into a black hole, it would shrink to just 0.22 millimeters in diameter, but it would still be the same Moon - just squished down to an insane level. That’s why its gravity is so strong. Think of it like this: Moon turns into a black hole -> now it's 0.22 millimeters in diameter but with the same mass as the Moon, except now all that gravity is focused in that tiny space, making it way more intense.
Dark matter, though, is something totally different. We can’t see it, and it doesn’t act like normal matter - it only shows up through its gravity. Black holes are still regular matter, just super dense, and we can actually detect them by how they mess with light and stuff around them. The light gets warped around the black hole because of its intense gravity, and the event horizon is the point of no return where nothing, not even light, can escape.
@@SilentKnightXXVIIs that a matter of fact?
@@hobowithawaterpistol9070it’s true, dark matter acts very differently to black holes. Dark matter is practically everywhere, and adds to the gravity balance needed to keep galaxies together otherwise things would fly apart. Like spinning on a roundabouts super fast. Your body wants to fly off of it.
It’s a quark star.
The blacker the hole the darker the matter
Thanks
Everytime I watch a video about space I realise just how small and insignificant I am lol
I think understanding quantum physics is more easier than understanding what the goal of this video is this all about😡
More easier?
@@timothyeichinger3592Yes, very more easier.
goal?
Here's a thought to consider - because photons travel at the speed of light, time and distance do not exist for them. That means from the perspective of a photon, the moment one is created it instantly hits something and is adsorbed regardless of how far or long it's traveled. That's relativity for you.
Also consider that on beaches all over the world there are naked, sweaty Germans looking like large, pink, semi-deflated and wrinkly balloons, covered in lint. Ruining the experience for EVERYONE ELSE, including many photons who's only existence is: Sun->Sweaty German arse... or worse!
Leave the Germans alone! They've had a pretty rough time over the last century or so, and need a bit of break from being criticized, especially with respect to their skin colour and levels of sweatiness.
I just love how "science" can sometimes make up stories (theories) and sort of run with it and cement it until it somewhat becomes truth that everyone runs with...am talking about the origin of virtually everything. "We don't understand how supermassive blackholes form but we know that enormous cloud of primordial gas, where hydrogen and helium were commonplace...when these collapse, they normally form starts. But..." That sounds pretty cool if you think about it BUT...I mean truthfully, what makes that different from mythical stories?
This channel has been missing from my feed for years.. good to see you again... not sure if I miss the mustache and suspenders..
I have a hypothesis that dark matter can be explained with an antimatter distribution in the core of stellar objects. It anhilated instantly, the gamma rays form a k-ring mostly, the energy still atributes to gravity, but the energy thresholds determine that the observable anhillation energy past the surface of the sun shifts below plank values. So we have all the variables to balance and distribute, and figuring out the process by which the gamma rays are confined can help with figuring out cold fusion. Possibly qgp
Been watching you for a bit now, great stuff keep it up!
Has anyone ever questioned if the Big Bang was the start of our galaxy and not the start of the universe? Since you said a huge amount of energy would be required to make it?
I still like the idea that dark matter/energy comes from the big bang where positive matter and anti-matter collided creating two flows of time. Our positive universe has a bit of the positive matter that avoided the anti-matter, being pushed away with half of the dark matter by the reaction of the explosion, with the remaining bits of anti-matter that avoided the positive matter are pushed in the opposite direction.
Danke!
As you rightly pointed out, the gravitational force from visible matter alone isn’t enough to explain how galaxies maintain their structure. This is precisely why scientists propose the existence of dark matter, an invisible substance providing the extra gravitational force needed to hold galaxies together.
Patterns and repetitions in nature are key to understanding black holes.
Whether you think they are whirls around a collider, like a tornado, or a dark star, like a gas giant that is no longer a star but a plantery system; black holes are compacted either by low pressure or a gaint dark existence, or both and with a portal to something like a plank's constant of mega gravity! Almost like Saturn's belt, further the drum orbital seen like a light beam from the centre of darkness; the 'higgs boson' remains a strange portal between subatomic magnetism and neutrons of matter.
The first two orbitals are locked, you cannot add to their event horizon!
Can you only attract dark matter sometimes, or gas giants, then other asteroid belts!
The universe is the equivalent of that one friend you thought you knew but are actually more secretive than you think
Black holes are not stars but collapsars. They are in a similar classification as neutron stars (pulsars and magnetars) and white dwarfs. Stars (in their cores or shell burning, like Betetguese), fuse the nucleii of lighter elements to heavier elements, like hydrogen to helium (as in the core of the sun) .
I love watching your channel. I always find it interesting and informative! ❤
Supermassive black holes doesn't hold galaxies togheter. It's a common misconception, but the actual range where their gravitational pull is significant is very, very small compared to the radius of a galaxy.
LOVE your videos Thoughty, keep 'em coming please!
The animations in this video are absolutely stunning. If you produce them yourself, then very well done, indeed.
If we're trying to learn more about Dark Matter and Energy we need to stop putting all the focus on gravitational waves. Electromagnetic waves are just as powerful if not more powerful than gravity. Electromagnetism can be Sooooooooooooo powerful it rips the Iron(Fe, 26) from our blood though the skin and all. If our basis is this matter and energy is responsible for the increased acceleration of the Universe Like Electromagnetic poles fits that bill better than gravity.
There's also no reason to assume that there is only one type of dark matter. Some types might be some that strongly interacting with other dark matter types that are either weak against us or non interacting entirely. There could be an entire cosmology that doesn't directly interact with us.
Galaxies, even our's spin solely because of the gravitational & electromagnetic waves moving around Sagittarius-A Star are Sooooooooooooo powerful they pull the rest of the galaxy around them. Without Sagittarius-A Star our galaxy wouldn't spin and we wouldn't be possible. These thangs are scary but also we should love and respect these bodies. They give our Sun and Solar System that energy & The Sun takes 90% of that and channels it to us. Hey, we're monster big fish too. We redistribute the energy to our Luna. Every movement is based on the gravitational and electromagnetic waves of a bigger body. Sooooooooooooo you see energy isn't created or destroyed. When you burn a piece of paper you don't create the energy. You used heat to make fuel and Oxygen(O, 8) change its energy state. The burning releases photons, heat and other stuff Sooooooooooooo the energy is changed, not destroyed. And the matter is easier. Sooooooooooooo when you burn the paper, the paper changes to ash and gasses. The matter is not destroyed its just changed it's physical state.