This is fascinating, but I am a bit confused by one thing, hopefully you can explain. The 'er' in service used to be pronounced as /ɛr/ in earlier forms of English (and presently in some parts of Scotland) but in your dialect, you seem to pronounce it as /ɝ/. How come you split this sound up, as if the E and the R were separate sounds? These letter-forms in the Latin alphabet do not determine how the language is spoken; there are unfortunately many illiterate but perfectly fluent speakers. Also, would this system work with an alternative writing system for English, such as Shavian? Thank you greatly
Thank you for your question. What I have noticed so far in Western languages which use Roman letters is that written letters are leading mostly. Of course pronouncements give different emphasises. Mostly they just give idea what is leading the final interpretation while the foundation remains the same. The first E here is blend in with the round R and the last one isn't even heard. I kept it save for me while investigating words and languages for getting more experience with what I know. Perhaps you can suggest an investigation of a different word or writing which you know beforehand exactly what to interpret what you got. These Roman letters were invented in the same way as astrological signs and were founded showing specific directions that could be used in multiple ways. Of course alphabets like Shavian, which I didn't know, were probably used as a tool to understand and recognise specific sounds better. Some of the letters might be pretty helpful to remember and distinct them from each other. I don't know how good they were as a whole or system. If there is a very specific combination that intriges you, please tell me about it.
PS to be more specific: in the numerological order R connects itself to time always, while E is about starting timings, so whether you have the E or not in that case does not even make a difference. In logic they are used together always. R is used here as "ER" anyhow. The 'round R' emphasizes this even more. They blend as a significant orientation in timing even more.
This is fascinating, but I am a bit confused by one thing, hopefully you can explain. The 'er' in service used to be pronounced as /ɛr/ in earlier forms of English (and presently in some parts of Scotland) but in your dialect, you seem to pronounce it as /ɝ/. How come you split this sound up, as if the E and the R were separate sounds? These letter-forms in the Latin alphabet do not determine how the language is spoken; there are unfortunately many illiterate but perfectly fluent speakers.
Also, would this system work with an alternative writing system for English, such as Shavian?
Thank you greatly
Thank you for your question. What I have noticed so far in Western languages which use Roman letters is that written letters are leading mostly. Of course pronouncements give different emphasises. Mostly they just give idea what is leading the final interpretation while the foundation remains the same. The first E here is blend in with the round R and the last one isn't even heard. I kept it save for me while investigating words and languages for getting more experience with what I know. Perhaps you can suggest an investigation of a different word or writing which you know beforehand exactly what to interpret what you got. These Roman letters were invented in the same way as astrological signs and were founded showing specific directions that could be used in multiple ways. Of course alphabets like Shavian, which I didn't know, were probably used as a tool to understand and recognise specific sounds better. Some of the letters might be pretty helpful to remember and distinct them from each other. I don't know how good they were as a whole or system. If there is a very specific combination that intriges you, please tell me about it.
PS to be more specific: in the numerological order R connects itself to time always, while E is about starting timings, so whether you have the E or not in that case does not even make a difference. In logic they are used together always. R is used here as "ER" anyhow. The 'round R' emphasizes this even more. They blend as a significant orientation in timing even more.