How to stop mass shootings
Вставка
- Опубліковано 31 лип 2024
- 60.5% of all shooters have a mental issue and a sign of crisis
31.4% of all shooters are under 26 years old
11.6% of all shooters are under 26 & got their gun(s) legally
4.65% of all shooters meet the previous criteria and shot up a school k-12,
private, or college
Despite only making up 4.65% they are responsible for 17% of all mass shooting deaths.(Most under 18 years old)
98.4% of mass shootings happen inside of GUN FREE zones
www.theviolenceproject.org/ma...
**numbers are from the data on the website current as of Feb.26 2020**
If you support this idea then please share this video with others, especially your State Representatives and or Senators.
If you have feedback please leave a comment, or send it to me privately on Instagram-- chuckyboi_vi
______________
This is not the final form of this bill everything here is open to question and further consideration.
The Stop Mass Shootings Act
Section 1 - Waiting Periods for Firearms Purchases:
(a) All purchases of firearms through any Federal Firearms License (FFL) dealer shall require a waiting period of six (6) weeks from the date of purchase before the buyer can take possession of the firearm.
(b) Exceptions: The waiting period may be waived if the buyer can present three (3) signatures from individuals who are able to own firearms attesting to the buyer's fitness to safely operate and store a firearm.
(b.1) Co-signers: If a person co-signs on a buyer being fit to own a firearm and the buyer uses said firearm in any crime within the original six-week waiting period or commits a mass shooting after the waiting period, all three (3) co-signers shall be held partially accountable for the crime(s) and shall no longer be able to buy, own, or live with firearms. This liability can be waived if the cosigning party reports that this person is dangerous, and the firearms are taken from the original owner either by family/friends or local police until the threat subsides.
(c) Psychiatric Evaluation: If the buyer chooses to wait six (6) weeks, they shall be required to undergo a psychiatric evaluation before receiving the firearm. If the evaluation determines that the person has any mental health issues, they must obtain three (3) signatures attesting to their fitness to own a firearm before receiving said gun.
(d) Exceptions: Any individual with a license to carry or more extensive training (Police, Military) can skip the entire 6-week waiting period immediately.
Section 2 - Basic Gun Safety Education for Buyers:
(a) All FFL dealers shall check buyers for general knowledge of basic gun safety.
(b) If a buyer cannot display basic gun safety, they shall be required to take a lesson in gun safety before being able to purchase a firearm.
(c) Exceptions: Any individual with more extensive training or a license to carry can skip this process.
Section 3 - Private Sale Loophole opened in Section 1:
(a) Any individual under the age of 25 trying to purchase a gun through a private sale shall be required to meet the seller at an FFL dealer to verify the buyer has a basic understanding of gun safety as well as to start the transfer process.
(b) All buyers under the age of 25 shall be required to go through the same 6-week waiting period as stated in Section 1, and they shall be required to obtain three (3) signatures before they can take possession of the firearm.
(c) The FFL dealer shall oversee holding the firearm until the waiting period is over and shall be allowed to charge a predetermined fee for the transfer and holding of the gun. The FFL dealer shall not keep any record of the seller or the firearm outside of what is required to hold the gun during the waiting period.
Section 4 - Accountability for Gifting Firearms:
(a) If any recipient of a firearm commits any crime with said firearm, the individuals who gave them the gun shall be held partially accountable for the crime.
(b) If the recipient is still living with the gifters of the gun when the crime is committed, then the gifters shall be held accountable.
(c) If the recipient no longer lives at home but is under the age of 25, then the gifters shall still be held accountable.
(d) Additionally, if a child steals a gun from their parents and commits a crime the parents or guardians should be held partially accountable as well.
Section 5 - 98% of shootings are in gun free zones:
(a) Any citizen should be allowed to conceal carry a firearm anywhere they go, and should be encouraged to do so if they have higher levels of training and or a conceal carry license
(b) It will be up to the property owner(s) if open carry is allowed, though it is not encouraged.
00:00 Intro
04:50 Section 1
09:13 Section 2
10:53 Section 3
14:50 Section 4
18:08 Section 5
23:10 How to help
Lakewood church
Kansas City chiefs
chucky for president
Not yet not yet lmfao we can save that 2032
Good information No Cap 👍🏽🔥👍🏽..
My high school was shot up during my senior year and I lost a friend of mine, so I was ready to approach this with maximum cynicism as a stranger on the internet. I've spent a considerable amount of time dealing with depression and mental health as a result of the trauma. As I've become relatively familiar with psychiatric healthcare, I would be curious to know the diagnostic history of the 89% of mentally distressed shooters. How many of them were diagnosed Before the event, and how many of them were diagnosed during proceedings, possibly in attempts to secure a plea bargain?
I agree with the education point though, while I would rather just avoid gunstuff altogether, my dad was a marine so I just happened to learn all about safe firearm handling as a kid. I feel like its one of those taboo topics that needs to be addressed similarly to stuff like sex and drugs. most of us are involved with em, none of us want to talk about em with a clear head.
I feel conflicted about the gun free zone point, but I have to admit it makes sense. I do think it would be worth including carefully balanced penalties or fines if the weapon is poorly concealed, as that provides an unstable individual with an opportunity to grapple for it, and a general disruption of comfort for many. I grew up in a rural area, so I know half of the kids had a pocket knife on em, and nobody got in trouble for it unless they were a flashy dipshit. I think it would be better replace "gun free zones" with something to the tune of "Protected space" where violent crimes can be prosecuted with much harsher penalties. This would serve to offer the symbolic "protection" offered under current policies, while removing the 'fish in a barrel powertrip' allure from prospective shooters.
Regardless of the points I've poked around, I really appreciate how much time and consideration you've put into all of this, and I'm glad there's folks like you voting (that is Not something I say lightly)
Thank you for the feedback! And the perspective! Something needs to change literally anything changing could be better than what has happened. The “folks like you voting” was funny cause I always say “I can’t believe they can vote” lmao. I have submitted this to every government representative above me, including local to the Oval Office. I have received no feedback or responses other than one phone interview of which I was later ignored. I don’t know how many more children and people have to be killed like this before someone makes a change.
I'm honestly not against it. I'm heavily pro 2nd amendment. This overall helps the general majority while still keeping guns "legalized"
Great work!
I do wonder who's eligible to give out these signatures/voucher that's my only concern.
Can you elaborate on your question? Are you referring to the co signers?
@@thechuckyboi1438 yes the co-signers
@@nukelotide2151 the idea is that only other people eligible to buy guns would go to the the FFL and go through the regular background check process.
If they get through that then they can be considered for a co-signing of someone else.
I’m an instance where you are want to sign for someone in another state then we would have to create a process that the original FFL could do it online or maybe the co-signers local FFL could communicate with the purchasers FFL
Edit: does that clarify your question?
Pretty good points.
I don't live in the US. I've kind of always wanted to live there but immigration and visa policies are just an insanity so never even tried.
To then deal with potential racism, lack of basic healthcare and now the rampant gun violence.
So great ecosystem to start a business (is it still tho?... SVB😅), but to a very big cost.
My thoughts on the last one on the Gun free zone....
Since I don't live in the US, my views are only external so obvious apologies if they are a bit biased.
My theory and opinion on the US gun problem, is:
1- Industry: Gun industry is huge and it accounts for billions of dollars in the economy. Being a 300million population you gotta have a complex economy otherwise people would be without work.
And even as a shitty gun industry as it is right now, it helps to give work to people as it creates thousands of required positions. From permit controllers, gun manufacturers, technicians, instructors, etc.
You get the idea.
So the gun industry is not a bad thing. It's just that wackos with guns end up killing innocent people.
2- Military: Building on industry, having a wide range of manufacturers, and people who become private gun experts, it also helps the military to keep a local and steady supply of guns and people to consult on perhaps new techniques and technology that sometimes is developed privately. (Some do get military contracts)
At economies of scale, since you can sell guns locally, it also helps to mass produce them, reducing the price/cost of manufacturing, as otherwise it would be very expensive, potentially leaving your military too slow to react.
3- Geopolitical power: I've always seen that the largest excuse for guns in the US is that they just want to maintain their status as dominant power in the world.
Even if by some absurd reason some country was able to reach mainland US for an invasion, then it would also have to deal with an armed population, with the full breath of even assault weaponry. So you don't f*ck with them. Beating the US military is a big challenge, to then have to deal with an armed population that will definitely not behave as military so they can be much less predictable and harder to control than traditional military.
This renders the US very hard to invade unless a huge attack takes place.
Which is precisely the "No gun free zone" policy, just at a different scale.
If anyone wanted to forcefully invade a place, is much easier to do where there is no resistance as you say. So if shooters see the potential for unpredictable and strong resistance, it might be a big deterrent for many of these cases, as they would be shit scared to even try, as they know there will be someone waiting. (Or might not, but just instilling the doubt in them might suffice to deter them - it becomes a poker game, where even a bluff can make someone fold)
----
Good points. I'd also add harsher penalties. Like legit bring back death penalty for serious mass shooters and gun offenders. There is zero need to waste taxpayer money in maintaining scumbags in jail.
Rehab and reinsertion programs are for those who struggle and have a genuine desire for good.
There is always a point of no return and any mass shooter definitely crosses that line. They should be held accountable.
Again, something like this would send a strong message. Indonesia, Singapore and other countries have harsh penalties including death penalty.
Risking electric chair, hanged, or executed by shooting probably doesn't appeal to anyone. F*ck lethal injection, it's so expensive that is barely used, and they give a soft goodbye for someone who violently took the lives of possibly many others. They should be ready to die in the same way their victims did.
And to clarify, I don't believe in the eye-for-an-eye, but I do believe in strong accountability and dealing with the consequences of their choices and actions.
Thanks for the comment,
Yes there is definitely a huge economy around guns and that’s why the “ban guns movement” wouldn’t work because so many people make so much money on it
With this solution I think it could keep those jobs in place but also make it harder for crazy people to get them.
I agree on the death penalty for extreme cases like these the only reason I didn’t include it is because that is a real controversial thing and I wouldn’t want to sink the whole ship for that point.
But I really do appreciate all the thought and time you put into your response, thank you again!
Can a co-signer sign for an unlimited amount of gun purchases?
In California there is a 30 day waiting period for gun purchases of a certain category. Would this be increased to 42 days?
Thanks for the video
Yes the co signer could sign for any amount they will be accepting the risk of that person(s) commiting a crime though.
I do appreciate you pointing out that potential loophole.
The amount of time for the waiting period is up in the air I guess it’s actually irrelevant because if you just made it a requirement to get signatures or a psychiatric evaluation then the waiting period wouldn’t serve any purpose.
That just occurred to me typing that thank you for your comment
@@thechuckyboi1438 Another thing I am thinking is the rules/laws don't have to be perfect. We can get something out sooner and make changes if things are not working as expected, as opposed to doing nothing waiting for the perfect set of rules. Thanks for making this video again
@@gregrivera9079 I definitely agree with you I would like to see more rapid change, just any change at all really.
The reason I want to nail down these details is because when you submit a bill to become a law it goes through a committee first before seeing any floor.
Their job is to review the wording and format it properly so the representatives can understand it completely.
If you submit an incomplete idea they fill in the blanks and it usually becomes politically charged one way or another so when it hits a floor for review it already is shoved aside.
I believe if I mail down the details enough when I submit it there will be such little wiggle room that they will only be able to format it and not add/remove things in the name of “formatting”
You know what, good on you for thinking about this pragmatically rather than just repeating the Republican mantra that "all gun laws are unconstitutional". The laws are pretty relaxed as is, yet we still have lots of gun violence and accidents. Personally I think you should be required to take a gun safety course before buying your first gun. Also, get rid of tax stamps for suppressors and short barrel rifles, you should be able to buy suppressors in a store and walk out like in Europe.
Thank you for your support! I personally agree and I believe those changes will come in time, a lot of the laws restricting those items come from false representation of those items but that is a problem I’d like to address once this one is handled.
I think it is very important to be able to see your personal beliefs and also societal beliefs because if we can’t agree on anything nothing will ever get better. And kids are dying regardless of what their parents personal beliefs are. Thanks again for your comment and watch out for future short form videos on the subject!
@@thechuckyboi1438 well my rationale with removing those item restrictions is not only common sense but also to use them as a bargaining chip to get Republicans on board with the deal. That's just how politics is, unfortunately. Two sides that never agree on almost anything.
@@schm147 so you believe that this idea needs to cater to more republican beliefs before it could be supported by the masses?