Though Kant eschewed the use of examples to illustrate his arguments (7+5=12 notwithstanding), I appreciate their use in this series of videos and find them to be helpful aids to understanding. I also finally see clearly, I think, the dialectic of Kant (Copernican Revolution) to Hegel (theory precedes practice) to Marx (practice precedes theory).
The summary of the full argument at the end served as a great recap to the more in-depth sections, and tied everything together nicely. What a great video!
Thank you - a very clear and concise explanation of the Kant’s remarkable theory. It’s not easy to summarise such a complex theory but this video does it extremely well.
I just found your channel! I'm probably going to binge watch all your videos when I turn in my last paper before summer! Ik heb zo'n voorgevoel dat je Nederlands bent haha. Het accent heeft iets herkenbaars. Top kanaal dit! je hebt een extra sub!
What an amazing content, I'd love to watch more of these about the next concepts in the book, but it seems like you stopped, what happened? Do you think in coming back and continuing the series?
Thank you so much! If I might ask, why did you watch the video(s), why was it helpfull to you? What kind of journey are you on? 😁 Its amazing to me that there are other people that want watch these videos like I love to do, that there are people that want to watch 20 minutes of abstract philosophy haha 🙂
@@eversbrothersproductions1476 philosophy isn't exactly my filled. But i have been recently watching some explainations of Lacanian theory bcs i wanted to apply it on advertisment analysis. Then I found your videos which are very dinstinguished in thier structre. I hope that your channel get more followers. And i hope that you will keep producing. thank you again.
Thanks for your comment! And I apologise that there has been some time without uploads, but we are working on some new videos! Some on capitalism, some on nietzsche and some on Schopenhauer/Lacan. So see you soon! 😊
0:15 seeing and sensibility are not the same thing. Sensibility comes first, seeing comes later. Kant is not at this point speaking of perception of objects, not even of photons. The act of a photon striking the eye awakens the sensibility into action.
A single photon hitting your eye rouses our dormant sensibility. The sensibility, through its forms of time and space, structures the raw data of many photons. Only after the concepts of the understanding can we see something specific like a shiny light or a red ball.
I have to admit i burst into laughter near the end of this video as it truly dawned on me what the implications are of all this. We don't really know what anything is 😂 we only know what an object's relation to us and other objects is, not what it actually is. As i watched this video i was looking at my clock as an example. The clock is not actually a clock in itself it is only a clock when i use it to tell the time. To my dog it is just a round thing on the wall
"We don't really know what anything is." That's not what Kant is saying. Videos such as this one only lead people down the wrong path to comprehending Kant.
For now it is. I am working on a video that reconstructs Fichte's philosophy following Kant. After that I will also make a video on Kant's morality that he discusses in his critique. However, the most interesting stuff about idealism is already in these videos. If you have something specific that you would like to see in a video please let us know, than I will look at it 😊
Let's play amateur physicist and pretend physics needs us to explain the ontological significance of physics through circular, juvenile word games based upon intellectually shallow arguments ("I lost count, so it's synthetic!"). Modern "philosophers" are narcissistic historians.
Though Kant eschewed the use of examples to illustrate his arguments (7+5=12 notwithstanding), I appreciate their use in this series of videos and find them to be helpful aids to understanding. I also finally see clearly, I think, the dialectic of Kant (Copernican Revolution) to Hegel (theory precedes practice) to Marx (practice precedes theory).
The summary of the full argument at the end served as a great recap to the more in-depth sections, and tied everything together nicely. What a great video!
Thank you so much, that means a lot! 😁
Thank you - a very clear and concise explanation of the Kant’s remarkable theory. It’s not easy to summarise such a complex theory but this video does it extremely well.
What a beautiful channel. Upload again brother
This is a good explanation of Kant's philosophy.
Putting it here for algo to notice this. You deserve more subscribers.
your videos are like brain-refreshers through this algorithm thank you for making them
You deserve more subscribers for the effort you put into these videos. Thanks so much again.
I love everything about your videos and I hope you're able to continue making them.
Thank you for this video. This theory is one of my favorites because it feels easy to verify in my own experience.
It's very informative and knowledge provoking effort. Some of my conceptual confusions are addressed in Video. Thanks a lot.
I just found your channel! I'm probably going to binge watch all your videos when I turn in my last paper before summer!
Ik heb zo'n voorgevoel dat je Nederlands bent haha. Het accent heeft iets herkenbaars.
Top kanaal dit! je hebt een extra sub!
Thank you so much! Ik ben blij dat je er wat aan hebt! 😁
Brilliant as usual. You need to boost your subscribers
Great work!
What an amazing content, I'd love to watch more of these about the next concepts in the book, but it seems like you stopped, what happened? Do you think in coming back and continuing the series?
Thank you.
Your videos are infinitely helpful
Thank you so much! If I might ask, why did you watch the video(s), why was it helpfull to you? What kind of journey are you on? 😁
Its amazing to me that there are other people that want watch these videos like I love to do, that there are people that want to watch 20 minutes of abstract philosophy haha 🙂
@@eversbrothersproductions1476 philosophy isn't exactly my filled. But i have been recently watching some explainations of Lacanian theory bcs i wanted to apply it on advertisment analysis. Then I found your videos which are very dinstinguished in thier structre.
I hope that your channel get more followers. And i hope that you will keep producing.
thank you again.
Thanks. Very understandable😊
Great video my Lacanian brethren haha!
Bros, new stuff? Anytime soon? Miss your regular uploads
Thanks for your comment! And I apologise that there has been some time without uploads, but we are working on some new videos! Some on capitalism, some on nietzsche and some on Schopenhauer/Lacan. So see you soon! 😊
@@eversbrothersproductions1476 Awesome! Looking forward to it!
@@eversbrothersproductions1476 Great news. Love your work.
0:15 seeing and sensibility are not the same thing. Sensibility comes first, seeing comes later. Kant is not at this point speaking of perception of objects, not even of photons. The act of a photon striking the eye awakens the sensibility into action.
A single photon hitting your eye rouses our dormant sensibility.
The sensibility, through its forms of time and space, structures the raw data of many photons.
Only after the concepts of the understanding can we see something specific like a shiny light or a red ball.
It probably takes a few hundred photons to eventually create a basic image in the mind.
excellent video
I have to admit i burst into laughter near the end of this video as it truly dawned on me what the implications are of all this. We don't really know what anything is 😂 we only know what an object's relation to us and other objects is, not what it actually is. As i watched this video i was looking at my clock as an example. The clock is not actually a clock in itself it is only a clock when i use it to tell the time. To my dog it is just a round thing on the wall
Just love your comment haha 😄
it's not even a round thing on the wall
@@jonathanwoodvincent 8 months later and with further diving into philosophy i agree 😂
at least there's Don Pullen for you: ua-cam.com/video/ZjLQB7AI2Po/v-deo.html&ab_channel=DonPullen-Topic @@TheGiantMidget
"We don't really know what anything is." That's not what Kant is saying. Videos such as this one only lead people down the wrong path to comprehending Kant.
if i go for a walk without a purpose then can be no wrong turn!
Is this the last video on Critique?
For now it is. I am working on a video that reconstructs Fichte's philosophy following Kant. After that I will also make a video on Kant's morality that he discusses in his critique. However, the most interesting stuff about idealism is already in these videos. If you have something specific that you would like to see in a video please let us know, than I will look at it 😊
@@eversbrothersproductions1476 A video on Antinomies would be interesting.
I don't why this is still a thing.
"we can reconstruct a whole world in our minds." That's not what Kant said.
一切皆有定数
More or less
@@benquinneyiii7941 More!
Let's play amateur physicist and pretend physics needs us to explain the ontological significance of physics through circular, juvenile word games based upon intellectually shallow arguments ("I lost count, so it's synthetic!"). Modern "philosophers" are narcissistic historians.
Cry more 🐒
Bro you lost😭😭