Smug Kane uses the word 'confusion' twice in her weird 'explanation'. I think the only person confused is her. You can't run 10 meters over the mark if the umpire hasn't called play-on. It isn't a complicated rule.
It's a regular occurrence for players to continue over the mark/straddle the ball/tackle the opposition after a mark has been taken, if they are still waiting for the umpire's call. Usually there is no 50 metre penalty paid in those circumstances
@@josshlegg8647 maybe a couple of steps with momentum. Not 2 players totally ignoring that the umpire has blown his whistle twice for a mark and still running at the player.
Laura's explanation made zero sense. Literally night and day, no blurred lines, it's always been a 50, even during this confusing phase of umpiring. Laura made a stupid comment and Eddie blindly followed.
He does not change direction. The steps he takes after the mark are in momentum and in line with the direction he was running to mark the ball. @@josshlegg8647
lol and if you can't see that he most obviously played on and only stopped once he saw he was going to get caught then you sir are watching the wrong game.
@@MikinGarage The fact that he may or may not have played on is irrelevant. The umpire whistled the mark and didn't call play on, at that point as soon as the pies players run over the mark (two of them did) it is 50.
@@Tosicc567 that was not momentum his body language says it all when a player has momentum and wants to stop they arch back and put there hand or hands up he continued on saw the collingwood player then decided to stop suddenly. exactly the umpire didn't call play on thats the whole point the AFL are saying that is what should have originally been done.
Two Collingwood players entered the protected area, both cribbed the mark, one held the player. 50 metre penalty according to the rulebook. You can also hear the umpire call "hold" after paying the mark, then he didn't have the guts to enforce the 50 metre penalty rule. Then this condescending justification which is blatantly wrong! The AFL is in a downward spiral 🌀⬇🌀⬇🌀
this season is actually atrocious , if you told someone 10 years ago this is how controversial the game would be and how stupid the umpiring system would be , they’d think you was on the gear.
The problem is there's too many rules that can contradict other rules. They've literally made the game an umpires call, which is ridiculous. Rules like if it's the push in the back or 'protecting space', it's up to the umpire to decide what he wants to pay! Stupid game now.
The big problem is that umpires will not pay free kicks against Collingwood in front of their goal. They allow Collingwood to play as they like when they are close to goal. This occurs over and over again in the crucial parts of close games.
Plenty of bad things happen for and against both teams your just blinded by hatred look at Collingwood getting a bad call against freo bet u forgot that hapoened
The officiating or over-officiating is making the game difficult to watch. It’s fine to say that mistakes are made, but games are being decided by horrendous calls every week it seems. And the AFL’s refusal to ever admit any wrongdoing or a mistake creates further division and frustration. The amount of influence umpires are having on the game makes it extremely unpalatable to viewers. Remove the stand rule, remove the 6-6-6 rule, understand that tackles are “dangerous” by intent and accidents/injuries will happen.
Contrary to what the thumbnail says, Laura Kane is not there to serve the fans. She is there to shoehown her politics into every aspect of the sport. The first and most noticeable things she has implemented been to remove players weights and police player and coach language on field. Both entirely unrelated to the sport and are ideologically motivated.
Yes. She is a DEI woke feminist, who obviously never played any sport, and is having her revenge. I’m also furious about the player weights etc. The AFL have to drop the woke crap and get an ex male player into Kane’s position. Dillon is also useless. Where do they find these fool$ … 🤡😵💀
The problem is that they justify bad decisions with absolutely crap excuses that then makes the umpires think “so my bosses think that’s a good call, I’ll keep doing it”. They bring in the damn insufficient intent rule which NONE of the umpires have enough game awareness to properly understand. A guy trying his best to keep the ball in going forward will be penalised then a minute later someone will stand over the ball and let it roll across the line or just run it straight over to avoid holding the ball and that’s fine. Its idiotic.
She talks more about the poor pies players being confused lmao The umpire didnt call play on, rule is its a fifty. The players know this and stopped with shocked looks. The umpires never make calls based on if a player is "confused" Laura Kane is an absolute joke. With her logic every single fifty call shouldnt be paid because the player is confused, you think player that kick the ball away dont think its their free kick? Shes a bloody joke and has no place talking on calls with her lack of knowledge. Also that umpire that got the Dunkley call wrong continues to do that, he is known for it. How tf is he still getting games, drop them until they get better and learn. Players get dropped for not performing, why are umpires so protected??
So players are supposed to anticipate and guess what the umpire might do, and put all their attention to the umpires. As opposed to the game itself, the ball and the opposing players. And players are told to play to the whistle and do what the umpire says. Well what happens when the umpires don't know what to do, second guess and do nothing? This game is a shambles and the AFL is a joke of a league. Thank God it's only us Aussies that have to suffer through this torture
In what world does Bailey Scott run off his line? The kid is a RIGHT footer, why would he run off his line to wheel onto his LEFT foot in the dying seconds of a match?? Seriously some people are football illiterate, particularly Eddie, who only sees through a black and white lens.
Ross is wrong about umpiring clarification. Not all decisions and mistakes are equal. AFL needs to explain howlers, and own the ones they got wrong. His comments came after the Suns match, where his side won because of the howler paid against Mac Andrew in the final minute. Of course he didn't want the AFL to admit they got that one wrong lol
Why is Damo running cover so hard for the touched goal? Its clear as day even on grainy footage it was touched and hes still pretending theres not enough evidence to overturn the decision. So if that isnt enough evidence then what is? Does his hand have to bend back? His forarm? Does he have to smother the ball?!
I don't want to call her a clown but her explanation is laughable... When you look at all the 50 meter panalties paid this year... this one is 10 times worse than most of them... There are swings & rounabouts in games with umpiring decisions... That was as poorly umpired as you will see
She is a 🤡 though. A woke, DEI 🤡 here to ruin our game. Hell, she knows nothing about the game. Pretty sure she never played at the highest level, and she wouldn’t want her weight publicized, so now we can’t see the AFL players weights either. Get rid of Kane and get a real (male) footy person in this most important position …
I am 100% on board with what Ross Lyon said. The media and the fans will continue to debate umpiring decisions regardless of what the afl says, so there isn’t any point in them making comments on specific umpiring decisions. It probably only makes the discussion worse
It’s taking the fact away that Collingwood were 54 points down. There’s mistakes by umpires every week and north only won the week before due to the umpires favouring them
The cameras are pathetic. The frame rate and clarity are poor for such a wealthy league with access to the worlds best technology. Having said that, even with shitty cameras, you can see fingers going back.
Let's not forget, she has never played this sport before.... We have someone who has never kicked a football competitively now deciding and dictating on rules. This game is gone
DEI Kane needs to be sacked and an ex male champion player needs to be appointed to the position before she bans tackling next. Just pathetic, this woke AFL … 🤡😵💀
What a week kneed mob you are. It was clearly a 50m penalty. Don't be intimidated by Eddie - say what you know to be true. "The first mistake was play-on should have been called". But it wasn't !!!!!!!
Sport across the word has gone to the dogs ever since women began to be intertwined with men in all areas of the game, someone needs to put their foot down and let them know their place.
Silly Eddie. What ever happened to the actual fact that nothing is a MARK until the bloody umpire actually BLOWS the whistle and calls a mark. Not up to any player to ANTICIPATE!
In a perfect world 🌎 I would agree. But the world isn't perfect. During the Essendon drugs scandal, the AFL didn't serve the people, and they won't serve them today. AFL is interested only in self-preservation rather than integrity and accountability. That's all
When the AFL says they are "not changing a rule, they are reinterperating" mid season (as with holding the ball) that tells you all you need to know. They will just go with the loudest voices on an issue, not necissarily the right ones.
Eddie your assessment is wrong on the 50m, it is going to lead to player undermining the whistle and it's going to be another club that feels the over correction. The game is 360 degree game, the player momentum into the mark led to him being off the line, when the player is unsure they are going to be paid the mark, they need to be prepared to play-on. Its not "it should of been play-on" , the mark is to reward the player with an unimpeded kick, similiarly the rules of stand is about speeding up the movement of the football and the defensive players ran over the mark!! Knowingly, It not a tacky to player ran back from the mark when told to stand So the next who is running with the flight of the football or come in from the side and marks, because there momentum takes them off the line, it's play on? You and I both know that not the case AFL having media people on the pay book looks so bad went they are clearly gagged, Damo
Umpiring has cost the Crows 8 points ( vs Essendon 24 , vs Sydney 23 ) and a finals appearance. There is no accountability despite admissions of wrong doing.
With the Brisbane tackle, had the opposition player done something silly and thrown out his head and hit his head people would say that it was a sling and a bad tackle. I don't think there's that much between that tackle and the Harley Reid tackle in execution, though the outcomes were different. Just to be clear I think it's a good fair tackle, and I think the opposition player did the correct safe thing as well.
Bring Dani Laidley in for Football boss. At least she played the game at its highest standards. Having some moronic woman in charge is just another knife in the back to the game.
The game is simply too hard to Umpire. Its literally near impossible. The AFL have changed the rules to make the game faster to yield more goals to then serve more paid advertisements to the viewers. They need to slow the game down to make it easier to umpire.
@@bdawg3942 putting time, effort and money into political nonsense while producing absolutely nothing on field. Someone should tell North that nobody wants to be lectured by a loser.
That’s pretty much the email I sent them. If you didn’t vote yes, the club apologised on it not going through. I said I voted No ( my choice) but you’re happy to take my membership $$’s each year. I also added…Nth Melb fc aren’t exactly the pinnacle of success , so you really shouldn’t be trying to influence anyones political decisions 👎! ❤️🌈🤮
Bartel always complaining about decisions that didn't go North's way. Complains about North player touching Crisp's kick for a goal. Nick Larkey took a mark over the goals/points line in the 1st quarter that led to a goal from 5 metres out. Review showed it. Decision wasn't overturned.
Eddie must realise we know he is defending Laura when she has made no sense whatsoever on this. I actually felt bad for her. It was a clear 50 metre penalty. The problem with Eddie and the AFL PR team is they think the public are stupid and that they are smarter . No one likes a patronising person and Eddie is certainly that
Absolutely no point in asking for an opinion from Eddie that involves Collingwood. If it was the same situation reversed he would have seen it as a categorical mistake against Collingwood, hysterical it cost Collingwood the game, asking for umpire heads. Umpire gets to call play on, not opposition players. So from now on Eddie is ok with players making the decision to ignore the umpire, decide for themselves what they think and there should be no penalties.
The game is played to the whistle. Like an Offside in the NFL, if you guess right it looks great but if you anticipate incorrectly, well you get penalised.
For all the complaining about the non 50m penalty for North no one mentions the 50 not paid to Daicos in the last quarter- he was paid a free and then Stephenson shoves him over - that has always been 50
Ross Lyon nails it perfectly. Why is one free kick different to another where there are bad calls during a game. Everyone cries about it only if its at the end of a close game and only when it involves collingwood, yet you never hear a whimper when collingwood get rolled by bad calls. There is a lot of problems with all this. TOO many umpires. Since they brought in 4 umpires they dont know if they are coming or going and they always look at each other to say to pay this and that. Its almost like they rely on the senior umpire to make the hard calls. Mass producing umpires is like mass producing volks wagons or mass producing pretty much anything. The quality diminishes. If you all want better umpiring, first the rules have to be fixed as the rules over the last 5 yrs alone are some of the most stupid rules to exist and not even umpired properly. The stand rule is so broken. Players with the ball dont even kick over the mark. They can be standing 5-10mtrs off the mark and there is no play on, yet the man on the mark cant move. This is the AFLs answer to speeding up the game. AFL footy has the worst rules in any global sport with so many grey areas and rules with clauses within clauses and it needs to go back to 2 or maybe 3 umpires. The more umpires, the more interpretations of the same rule will be played out. Even goal umpires dont even make solid calls as they rely on the video when its clear to see and boundary umpires are no better half the time, when all they have to do is run up and down and throw a ball now and then. The afl mass producing umpires and this is the end result. Glenn James is still one of the best umpires the game has had and he pretty much umpired games on his own. If ppl really want to be pedantic with the rules then you can take a really close look at running before bouncing. Seeing that 15m is required for both running without a bounce and kicking to a teammate to be paid a mark. How many ppl can honestly say that players are mostly running too far as when you see a kick paid with pissy little 10m kicks yet players run much further than the kicks that are paid marks. If you pay a mark that barely goes 15m then players should be penalized for running that same distance without a bounce, but they never are unless they are running about 30m. Not to mention players allowed to run off the mark outside the boundary when having a shot on goal, yet called play on when they barely move off the mark when having a set shot in front. Even hitting the post is a point when the rules stipulate that the ball has to cross the line. WHY. If it hits the post then its technically play on if it bounces back in play as it clearly hasnt crossed the line. I could pick out so many more. The whole system is now broken. And dont anyone go crying and complaining about Laura. You were all kissing her ass when she had Maynard front the tribunal last year and wanted him suspended when the MRO cleared the matter but she brought it forward and now you all turn on her and many still go on about even to last week. My god footy followers are a fickle lot. But after following this game for 50yrs, ppl need to get their head out of their ass as bad calls in umpiring is and always has been part of the game. It happens with every team every week, so dont you all go crying that its collingwood because your own team gets its fair share of good and bad calls. It is what it is, you win some, you lose some. What needs to be done is reduce the interpretations of each rule on the field and having more umpires just makes it worse. They were called white maggots in the 80s for a reason. And the 80s also had a term called whinging poms, but crikey this country has a plague of whingers.
Why is it anticipated that the ump shouldv called play on? He marked it, so he calls a mark not play on ,,wtf,, barret a north supporter bags them the most along with hutchy
The AFLs woke, diversity hire of this woman is the real problem here. As long as Barrett remains employed in this capacity I will no longer watch this program. As for McGuire oh my good having him involved in Collingwood commentary is a recipe for disaster.
If you listen to just the audio of the umpire mic, you will hear that another umpire that was outside the screen actual calls play on as soon as Scott marks it. Then the umpire that was in the scree blows the whistle.
no. The umpire says "pay it", and the players would not have heard it given the crowd noise. But the officiating ump blows the whistle twice and calls mark. The Pies players were caught up in their own frenzy and ran 300m over the mark lol. You're never allowed to do that. One player can't do it, let alone 2. Entire footy world has said it was 50m except AFL that don't want to admit mistake and biased nuffies.
Smug Kane uses the word 'confusion' twice in her weird 'explanation'.
I think the only person confused is her. You can't run 10 meters over the mark if the umpire hasn't called play-on. It isn't a complicated rule.
yes, and she struggles to say error........ Pauses, and says "error .... if you will"
It's a regular occurrence for players to continue over the mark/straddle the ball/tackle the opposition after a mark has been taken, if they are still waiting for the umpire's call. Usually there is no 50 metre penalty paid in those circumstances
@@josshlegg8647 maybe a couple of steps with momentum. Not 2 players totally ignoring that the umpire has blown his whistle twice for a mark and still running at the player.
She just needed to come out with four words 'The decision was wrong.' Full stop. The end. No more patronising waffle.
Barrett is such an afl shill. Refuses to say the touched goal was wrong so he doesn't upset his buddies higher up, pretty disappointing
haha thats what i just said too
eddie is just as bad. Because it benefitted collingwood he defends Laura Kane but if it was against them he would be calling for her to be sacked
Don’t forget he literally is employed by the AFL. Just works for their media arm
You know the old saying don’t bite the hand that feeds you
all AFL media is - you think the ABC journo who broke the Hawthorn racism investigation story is getting a press pass to AFL games?
Wow Eddie agrees with the explanation which works for collingwood 🤯
Laura's explanation made zero sense. Literally night and day, no blurred lines, it's always been a 50, even during this confusing phase of umpiring. Laura made a stupid comment and Eddie blindly followed.
Yea strange. McGuire is a Collingwood stooge. I can’t stand Collingwood
If that 50m call went against Collingwood instead of North, Eddie would not be so calm I can guarantee that.
Correct. And all the non-Coll fans would be laughing and praising AFL for letting Collingwood lose..
@TheMissiIe Magpies have had their fair share of good calls, bad calls, and non calls that potentially have cost games and the four points.
Eddie so biased, why would he play on backwards, clearly momentum.
Except he went sideways by about 3 metres...Play on is usually called after much less than that
He does not change direction. The steps he takes after the mark are in momentum and in line with the direction he was running to mark the ball. @@josshlegg8647
Of course this grub agrees with the explanation.
Yes he’s pathetic.
The most obvious 50m penalty you will ever see. If you don't think that's 50m, then you are watching the wrong game.
lol and if you can't see that he most obviously played on and only stopped once he saw he was going to get caught then you sir are watching the wrong game.
I think ultimately the right outcome occurs because the kick is like 4 metres. This one is fine for mine.
@@MikinGarage you are aware of momentum right? He ran sideways back to the mark as soon as he could, the umpire didnt call play on so its a fifty
@@MikinGarage The fact that he may or may not have played on is irrelevant.
The umpire whistled the mark and didn't call play on, at that point as soon as the pies players run over the mark (two of them did) it is 50.
@@Tosicc567 that was not momentum his body language says it all when a player has momentum and wants to stop they arch back and put there hand or hands up he continued on saw the collingwood player then decided to stop suddenly. exactly the umpire didn't call play on thats the whole point the AFL are saying that is what should have originally been done.
Two Collingwood players entered the protected area, both cribbed the mark, one held the player. 50 metre penalty according to the rulebook. You can also hear the umpire call "hold" after paying the mark, then he didn't have the guts to enforce the 50 metre penalty rule. Then this condescending justification which is blatantly wrong! The AFL is in a downward spiral 🌀⬇🌀⬇🌀
The whole of the West is in a downward spiral let’s be honest.
What is "cribbed"?
The game is well on the journey to being unwatchable.
AFL knows it's only North. So they don't really care. Hence why LK was happy to come out with that absolute dross of a reason.
What is "dross"?
The AFL is a joke at this point.
Put a chic in charge. What do you expect. Waste of space.
Bloody blow the whistle. They blow it a million times a game and can't blow it with less than a minute to go!
Summed it up perfectly. Patronising. Getting sick of watching AFL.
damo wearing his afl cap and not saying it was touched,
when we just saw the clip again and his finger bent back.
this season is actually atrocious , if you told someone 10 years ago this is how controversial the game would be and how stupid the umpiring system would be , they’d think you was on the gear.
The problem is there's too many rules that can contradict other rules. They've literally made the game an umpires call, which is ridiculous. Rules like if it's the push in the back or 'protecting space', it's up to the umpire to decide what he wants to pay! Stupid game now.
The big problem is that umpires will not pay free kicks against Collingwood in front of their goal. They allow Collingwood to play as they like when they are close to goal. This occurs over and over again in the crucial parts of close games.
That's why the magpies have won only 1 GF in 14 years !
Plenty of bad things happen for and against both teams your just blinded by hatred look at Collingwood getting a bad call against freo bet u forgot that hapoened
Damian cant tell that ball was touched? Time to visit specsavers.
Laura said, the initial mistake 'if you like'. No Laura, the mistake the umpire made was...
Give it away Kane. Pathetic explanation. You’re no good in that role so step aside. Of course Eddie agrees with it because it’s Collingwood
The officiating or over-officiating is making the game difficult to watch. It’s fine to say that mistakes are made, but games are being decided by horrendous calls every week it seems. And the AFL’s refusal to ever admit any wrongdoing or a mistake creates further division and frustration. The amount of influence umpires are having on the game makes it extremely unpalatable to viewers. Remove the stand rule, remove the 6-6-6 rule, understand that tackles are “dangerous” by intent and accidents/injuries will happen.
Contrary to what the thumbnail says, Laura Kane is not there to serve the fans.
She is there to shoehown her politics into every aspect of the sport. The first and most noticeable things she has implemented been to remove players weights and police player and coach language on field. Both entirely unrelated to the sport and are ideologically motivated.
Now that's fact so correct bro 100%
Yes. She is a DEI woke feminist, who obviously never played any sport, and is having her revenge. I’m also furious about the player weights etc. The AFL have to drop the woke crap and get an ex male player into Kane’s position. Dillon is also useless. Where do they find these fool$ … 🤡😵💀
The problem is that they justify bad decisions with absolutely crap excuses that then makes the umpires think “so my bosses think that’s a good call, I’ll keep doing it”. They bring in the damn insufficient intent rule which NONE of the umpires have enough game awareness to properly understand. A guy trying his best to keep the ball in going forward will be penalised then a minute later someone will stand over the ball and let it roll across the line or just run it straight over to avoid holding the ball and that’s fine. Its idiotic.
Umpires should be held accountable like any other employee would
Tell me you’re incompetent in your job without telling me !
Laura I would Resign if that is your explanation !
Laura Kane, clearly someone who knows AFL. Well suited in the AFL department under head of Umpiring Stephen McBurney. Two absolute clowns
Laura Kane has no idea what she’s talking about, the rule is there to stop defensive players anticipating the play on and stopping the flow of play
She talks more about the poor pies players being confused lmao The umpire didnt call play on, rule is its a fifty. The players know this and stopped with shocked looks. The umpires never make calls based on if a player is "confused" Laura Kane is an absolute joke. With her logic every single fifty call shouldnt be paid because the player is confused, you think player that kick the ball away dont think its their free kick? Shes a bloody joke and has no place talking on calls with her lack of knowledge. Also that umpire that got the Dunkley call wrong continues to do that, he is known for it. How tf is he still getting games, drop them until they get better and learn. Players get dropped for not performing, why are umpires so protected??
The real issue here is that the stand rule sucks and let's get rid of it.
The game has been shocking to watch for years. Umpires, players and fans have no idea what has happened to thr game in the last ten or so years..
Eddie is such a loser!!!! 😂 How predictable can one be. He’s so biased re: pies he’s now on Laura Kane’s side 🤣🤣🤣
can you imagine Eddie if the jumpers were opposite
So players are supposed to anticipate and guess what the umpire might do, and put all their attention to the umpires. As opposed to the game itself, the ball and the opposing players. And players are told to play to the whistle and do what the umpire says. Well what happens when the umpires don't know what to do, second guess and do nothing?
This game is a shambles and the AFL is a joke of a league. Thank God it's only us Aussies that have to suffer through this torture
In what world does Bailey Scott run off his line? The kid is a RIGHT footer, why would he run off his line to wheel onto his LEFT foot in the dying seconds of a match?? Seriously some people are football illiterate, particularly Eddie, who only sees through a black and white lens.
You are not allowed to run over the mark, regardless of if the umpire calls it or not. Confusion by opposition is not an excuse.
Good old Barrett, the spinless weasel
Ross is wrong about umpiring clarification. Not all decisions and mistakes are equal. AFL needs to explain howlers, and own the ones they got wrong. His comments came after the Suns match, where his side won because of the howler paid against Mac Andrew in the final minute. Of course he didn't want the AFL to admit they got that one wrong lol
The AFL has ruined the sport.
Why is Damo running cover so hard for the touched goal? Its clear as day even on grainy footage it was touched and hes still pretending theres not enough evidence to overturn the decision.
So if that isnt enough evidence then what is? Does his hand have to bend back? His forarm? Does he have to smother the ball?!
I don't want to call her a clown but her explanation is laughable... When you look at all the 50 meter panalties paid this year... this one is 10 times worse than most of them... There are swings & rounabouts in games with umpiring decisions... That was as poorly umpired as you will see
You just defined a clown bro. Thats what she is. Literally.
Ok I’ll call her a clown. The afl is so woke. Why are there so many birds 🦅 getting involved in our once great game. Get lost please
She is a 🤡 though. A woke, DEI 🤡 here to ruin our game. Hell, she knows nothing about the game. Pretty sure she never played at the highest level, and she wouldn’t want her weight publicized, so now we can’t see the AFL players weights either. Get rid of Kane and get a real (male) footy person in this most important position …
Yeah he played on running the wrong way Eddie, suprised he couldnt work tazzy into his answer the muppet
Why does she think it should have been play on.
Eddie you would have been sooking like you normally do if it was the other way around
You sook every time Collingwood wins dude lololololol 😁😁😉😎👊
I am 100% on board with what Ross Lyon said. The media and the fans will continue to debate umpiring decisions regardless of what the afl says, so there isn’t any point in them making comments on specific umpiring decisions. It probably only makes the discussion worse
Look at the umpire he blows his whistle and signal's a mark simple
It’s taking the fact away that Collingwood were 54 points down.
There’s mistakes by umpires every week and north only won the week before due to the umpires favouring them
Laura Fonzie Kane. I was wrrrrrr, wrrrrrr, wrrrrrrroooo🙄
The cameras are pathetic. The frame rate and clarity are poor for such a wealthy league with access to the worlds best technology. Having said that, even with shitty cameras, you can see fingers going back.
Gopro with 360p resolution gaffer taped to the goal post ...total joke
Let's not forget, she has never played this sport before....
We have someone who has never kicked a football competitively now deciding and dictating on rules.
This game is gone
DEI Kane needs to be sacked and an ex male champion player needs to be appointed to the position before she bans tackling next. Just pathetic, this woke AFL … 🤡😵💀
Everyone in the afl hierarchy needs to be sacked and start again from scratch. It’s become so corrupt it’s starting To feel like the nba or fifa
What a week kneed mob you are. It was clearly a 50m penalty. Don't be intimidated by Eddie - say what you know to be true. "The first mistake was play-on should have been called". But it wasn't !!!!!!!
Yet no one mentions the howler non-paid holding the ball right in front of Pies' goal earlier in the game. Swings and roundabouts.
Did you see Lloyd trying to keep the smirk of his face 😅
Eddie this guy is the biggest flog no idea. Just talks talks and talks we all just turn off. No idea.
Eddie is so full of it... 😂
Sport across the word has gone to the dogs ever since women began to be intertwined with men in all areas of the game, someone needs to put their foot down and let them know their place.
Laura Kane should go into politics
She’d be surrounded by other useless, overpaid fool$. Perfect for her. Just as long as she’s on the backbench … 🤡😵💀
how does an AFL coach not know that a free kick can change the momentum of games completely at that is why some are more important than others?
Silly Eddie. What ever happened to the actual fact that nothing is a MARK until the bloody umpire actually BLOWS the whistle and calls a mark. Not up to any player to ANTICIPATE!
In a perfect world 🌎 I would agree. But the world isn't perfect. During the Essendon drugs scandal, the AFL didn't serve the people, and they won't serve them today. AFL is interested only in self-preservation rather than integrity and accountability. That's all
Never forget what the AFL did to Fitzroy (a founding member), then prop up vacuous creations like Gold Coast and GWS.
Yes people are starting to work out this amateurish AFL organization.
@@paulkyriakopoulos3444 I worked it out years ago.
@@paulkyriakopoulos3444 I figured this out Long ago
When the AFL says they are "not changing a rule, they are reinterperating" mid season (as with holding the ball) that tells you all you need to know. They will just go with the loudest voices on an issue, not necissarily the right ones.
why do the afl feel like they have to justify every bad decision. just stfu, stop the bs.
Umpiring isnt that difficult and there is 4 of them. Stop making excuses.
Eddie your assessment is wrong on the 50m, it is going to lead to player undermining the whistle and it's going to be another club that feels the over correction.
The game is 360 degree game, the player momentum into the mark led to him being off the line, when the player is unsure they are going to be paid the mark, they need to be prepared to play-on. Its not "it should of been play-on" , the mark is to reward the player with an unimpeded kick, similiarly the rules of stand is about speeding up the movement of the football and the defensive players ran over the mark!! Knowingly,
It not a tacky to player ran back from the mark when told to stand
So the next who is running with the flight of the football or come in from the side and marks, because there momentum takes them off the line, it's play on? You and I both know that not the case
AFL having media people on the pay book looks so bad went they are clearly gagged, Damo
Bit soft now days, nahhh eddy it is just a call that involved the pies
I hate that they don't review touched anymore, we have seen multiple goals since the procedure change been given which are obviously touched
Touched should be gotten ridden of all together, if none of the umpires pick it up in real time. More goals is better for the game …
Lloyd is on every one of these shows
Umpiring has cost the Crows 8 points ( vs Essendon 24 , vs Sydney 23 ) and a finals appearance. There is no accountability despite admissions of wrong doing.
I know, I was there. And it happened right in front of moi. Right. In front. Of moi!
50 metres every day of the week
The one great weakness the game has is many of the rules are not specific, they are interpreted.
Even with that explanation that’s a 50 m on the technicality it should’ve been a 50 m penalty
That would have been 50m, 20 years ago, let alone the jokes they are consistently paying them for today.
With the Brisbane tackle, had the opposition player done something silly and thrown out his head and hit his head people would say that it was a sling and a bad tackle.
I don't think there's that much between that tackle and the Harley Reid tackle in execution, though the outcomes were different.
Just to be clear I think it's a good fair tackle, and I think the opposition player did the correct safe thing as well.
Dunkley and Harley's tackles are entirely different lol. Harley's reckless, Dunkley perfect execution and technique.
@@imalwaysright I think it's subjective.
The difference is the outcome more than anything.
@@smoothbeak No, the difference is the force and the follow through. Night and day.
@@smoothbeak they're objectively different. It's subjective saying they're the same.
Bring Dani Laidley in for Football boss. At least she played the game at its highest standards. Having some moronic woman in charge is just another knife in the back to the game.
Sonja asked me too like your comment for her 🌈❤️👍
The game is simply too hard to Umpire. Its literally near impossible.
The AFL have changed the rules to make the game faster to yield more goals to then serve more paid advertisements to the viewers.
They need to slow the game down to make it easier to umpire.
Laura Kane...and we wonder why the AFL is in decline
I’m no longer a Nth member. Too woke that club 🤮🌈❤️
@@bdawg3942 putting time, effort and money into political nonsense while producing absolutely nothing on field. Someone should tell North that nobody wants to be lectured by a loser.
That’s pretty much the email I sent them. If you didn’t vote yes, the club apologised on it not going through. I said I voted No ( my choice) but you’re happy to take my membership $$’s each year. I also added…Nth Melb fc aren’t exactly the pinnacle of success , so you really shouldn’t be trying to influence anyones political decisions 👎! ❤️🌈🤮
So on two occasions shown here Collingwood benefited from umpiring mistakes.
Hmmmmm.
Bartel always complaining about decisions that didn't go North's way. Complains about North player touching Crisp's kick for a goal. Nick Larkey took a mark over the goals/points line in the 1st quarter that led to a goal from 5 metres out. Review showed it. Decision wasn't overturned.
Eddie must realise we know he is defending Laura when she has made no sense whatsoever on this. I actually felt bad for her. It was a clear 50 metre penalty. The problem with Eddie and the AFL PR team is they think the public are stupid and that they are smarter .
No one likes a patronising person and Eddie is certainly that
Absolutely no point in asking for an opinion from Eddie that involves Collingwood. If it was the same situation reversed he would have seen it as a categorical mistake against Collingwood, hysterical it cost Collingwood the game, asking for umpire heads.
Umpire gets to call play on, not opposition players. So from now on Eddie is ok with players making the decision to ignore the umpire, decide for themselves what they think and there should be no penalties.
Play the whistle there be .no confusion eh simple play on even if there wrong
AFL is Collingwood bias. Explains Maynard getting nothing for knocking a bloke out and not even getting reported for his recent sling tackle.
Great to witness the boys fight back to get the win , but I've seen 2 or 3 incidents where nth should've got a free
what a mess
The game is played to the whistle. Like an Offside in the NFL, if you guess right it looks great but if you anticipate incorrectly, well you get penalised.
For all the complaining about the non 50m penalty for North no one mentions the 50 not paid to Daicos in the last quarter- he was paid a free and then Stephenson shoves him over - that has always been 50
Ross Lyon nails it perfectly. Why is one free kick different to another where there are bad calls during a game. Everyone cries about it only if its at the end of a close game and only when it involves collingwood, yet you never hear a whimper when collingwood get rolled by bad calls.
There is a lot of problems with all this. TOO many umpires. Since they brought in 4 umpires they dont know if they are coming or going and they always look at each other to say to pay this and that. Its almost like they rely on the senior umpire to make the hard calls. Mass producing umpires is like mass producing volks wagons or mass producing pretty much anything. The quality diminishes. If you all want better umpiring, first the rules have to be fixed as the rules over the last 5 yrs alone are some of the most stupid rules to exist and not even umpired properly. The stand rule is so broken. Players with the ball dont even kick over the mark. They can be standing 5-10mtrs off the mark and there is no play on, yet the man on the mark cant move. This is the AFLs answer to speeding up the game. AFL footy has the worst rules in any global sport with so many grey areas and rules with clauses within clauses and it needs to go back to 2 or maybe 3 umpires. The more umpires, the more interpretations of the same rule will be played out. Even goal umpires dont even make solid calls as they rely on the video when its clear to see and boundary umpires are no better half the time, when all they have to do is run up and down and throw a ball now and then. The afl mass producing umpires and this is the end result. Glenn James is still one of the best umpires the game has had and he pretty much umpired games on his own.
If ppl really want to be pedantic with the rules then you can take a really close look at running before bouncing. Seeing that 15m is required for both running without a bounce and kicking to a teammate to be paid a mark. How many ppl can honestly say that players are mostly running too far as when you see a kick paid with pissy little 10m kicks yet players run much further than the kicks that are paid marks. If you pay a mark that barely goes 15m then players should be penalized for running that same distance without a bounce, but they never are unless they are running about 30m.
Not to mention players allowed to run off the mark outside the boundary when having a shot on goal, yet called play on when they barely move off the mark when having a set shot in front.
Even hitting the post is a point when the rules stipulate that the ball has to cross the line. WHY. If it hits the post then its technically play on if it bounces back in play as it clearly hasnt crossed the line. I could pick out so many more.
The whole system is now broken.
And dont anyone go crying and complaining about Laura. You were all kissing her ass when she had Maynard front the tribunal last year and wanted him suspended when the MRO cleared the matter but she brought it forward and now you all turn on her and many still go on about even to last week. My god footy followers are a fickle lot.
But after following this game for 50yrs, ppl need to get their head out of their ass as bad calls in umpiring is and always has been part of the game. It happens with every team every week, so dont you all go crying that its collingwood because your own team gets its fair share of good and bad calls. It is what it is, you win some, you lose some. What needs to be done is reduce the interpretations of each rule on the field and having more umpires just makes it worse.
They were called white maggots in the 80s for a reason. And the 80s also had a term called whinging poms, but crikey this country has a plague of whingers.
Bro well stated and 100% correct 😊
Not 15 METRES Cmon
The AFL take fans for fools😂
That’s because most are sheep
Been inconsistent since the very first game of afl - umpires will always make mistakes
Why is it anticipated that the ump shouldv called play on? He marked it, so he calls a mark not play on ,,wtf,, barret a north supporter bags them the most along with hutchy
Eddie happy to draw a line once the umpires have cheated for him. Heads mass role at AFL house
Im a collingwood supporter and i can tell you straight up the AFL is absolute joke rn!!
Mark should have been reset at the very least. Split the difference
The AFLs woke, diversity hire of this woman is the real problem here. As long as Barrett remains employed in this capacity I will no longer watch this program. As for McGuire oh my good having him involved in Collingwood commentary is a recipe for disaster.
And don't forget dude you are a typical sook Collingwood hater that's all 🤣😁😄😉😁😎👊
If you listen to just the audio of the umpire mic, you will hear that another umpire that was outside the screen actual calls play on as soon as Scott marks it. Then the umpire that was in the scree blows the whistle.
no. The umpire says "pay it", and the players would not have heard it given the crowd noise. But the officiating ump blows the whistle twice and calls mark. The Pies players were caught up in their own frenzy and ran 300m over the mark lol. You're never allowed to do that. One player can't do it, let alone 2. Entire footy world has said it was 50m except AFL that don't want to admit mistake and biased nuffies.
AFL = LOL Eddie = Protect the AFL. AFL = PROTECT THE AFL.
Simple fix when she comes out stop the B/s and no flogging.
this is the VFL
Corrupt