When Uyghurs Ruled China | Uyghur Khaganate Documentary

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 чер 2024
  • Claim your SPECIAL OFFER for MagellanTV here: try.magellantv.com/hikmahistory. Start your free trial TODAY so you can watch Ottomans VS Christians: The Battle For Europe about the epic rivalry between the Ottoman Empire and the various Christian Empires of Europe:
    www.magellantv.com/series/ott...
    The plight of the Uyghurs is well-known in today’s world. The Chinese government has systematically targeted the Turkic ethnic group, in an effort to erode its cultural and religious identity. The downtrodden position they find themselves in now is in stark contrast to distant past where the Uyghurs actually established a powerful empire; one that held sway over parts of China and intimidated various Chinese emperors to make concessions. The Uyghur Khaganate lasted for just a century but in that time they’d become major players in domestic Chinese affairs. They also established a dominant presence on the Silk Road trade route, benefitting hugely as intermediaries.
    curiositystream.com/
    FREE NEWSLETTER:
    mailchi.mp/a69f93be6c66/hikma...
    - Become a Patron for as little as a dollar a month to vote on upcoming and keep the movement going!
    www.patreon.com/user?u=12397811
    Massive thank you to our Patreons:
    Deborah
    Yassine
    Taylor
    Richard
    Derek
    Richard Bryan
    So
    Pedro
    Leon
    Sam
    Zali
    Rob
    Aman
    Fodool
    Arcus
    Amin
    Burak
    Adam
    Bilal
    Arcus
    Elman
    TheBactrianGambler
    Adam
    Areeb
    Farid
    Ibrahim
    Ari
    Haseeb
    Amir
    Mahmoud
    Joel
    CoreBard
    - Join our social media community:
    Twitter:
    / hikmahistory
    Instagram:
    / hikmahistory
    Facebook:
    / hikmahistory
    Facebook group:
    / hikma. .
    #uyghur #xinjiang #chinahistory
    Images Used:
    Music Used:
    Doug Maxwell - Arabian Nightfall (Sting):
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bRzD...
    If any of the images or songs are yours, please let me know I will amend them. Please don't report me straight away!
    0:00 Intro
    2:37 Early Origins Under the Gokturks
    5:28 Establishment & Expansion of the Khaganate (747-808)
    12:18 The Decline was Quicker than the Rise (808-840)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 341

  • @HikmaHistory
    @HikmaHistory  10 місяців тому +23

    Could you see a scenario in the future where the Uyghurs of Xinjiang get some sort of an autonomous state?
    Medieval History Playlist: ua-cam.com/play/PLiPhmAD3I2JzCm2huELM5moDOPkP-EWNZ.html

    • @kevzortd8073
      @kevzortd8073 10 місяців тому +5

      Maybe a independent state when China breaks up

    • @beepboop204
      @beepboop204 10 місяців тому +1

      Confused Idealist Canadian Noises WHY CANT THEY ALL JUST GET ALONGGGGGG

    • @kuroazrem5376
      @kuroazrem5376 10 місяців тому

      I do. Long live East Turkestan. This will come when China inevitably collapses.

    • @kevzortd8073
      @kevzortd8073 10 місяців тому +1

      @@beepboop204 cuz history

    • @beepboop204
      @beepboop204 10 місяців тому

      😒@@kevzortd8073

  • @nenenindonu
    @nenenindonu 10 місяців тому +70

    The Uighurs have probably one of the oldest Turkic tribal ethnonyms along with the Kyrgyz, Khalaj, and Volga Tatars who identify as Bulgars

    • @AL_AFGHANI1
      @AL_AFGHANI1 10 місяців тому

      Volga bulgars who identify as tatars*

    • @middleeastrenwarriormen1017
      @middleeastrenwarriormen1017 10 місяців тому +9

      now,Khalaj life in Afghanistan called ( Ghilzai ) and West Khorasan still called : Khalaj Tork

    • @muhammadadeel8639
      @muhammadadeel8639 10 місяців тому +1

      What happened to karluks? Which country do they reside in today?

    • @middleeastrenwarriormen1017
      @middleeastrenwarriormen1017 10 місяців тому +2

      @@muhammadadeel8639 Karluk and Uighur was separated ethnic,Karluk from Karluk Yabghu and Kara Khanid

    • @vx8431
      @vx8431 10 місяців тому +1

      I'm not sure Orkhon Uyghurs are the same as modern Uyghurs as after the fall of the Okrhon Uyghur Khanate fell they were under various rulers.

  • @nomadenjoyer
    @nomadenjoyer 10 місяців тому +45

    The reason that the Türks and other Turkic nomads were formidable warriors was that they were horse-archers. A horse-archer specifically denotes a mounted warrior armed with a bow who can shoot from horseback while riding. The Turkic nomadic warriors as well as the Mongols used the composite bow, which was made of horn, wood, and sinew. The composite bow was more accurate and had a better range and rate of fire than muskets and early firearms. The tactical principles of the Turkic horse-archers were based on the combination of fire power and mobility. yhe nomadic horse-archers shot in volleys, weakening the enemy before they charged. Ideally, they practiced "fire power in movement" like modern armies.Other things being equal, the horse-archers were often almost unbeatable on the open battlefields. Against them, sedentary soldiers were often helpless until the development of efficient battlefield handguns, including the repeating firearms (the firearms that could be fired repeatedly before being manually reloaded) in the seventeenth century.

    • @user-op8fg3ny3j
      @user-op8fg3ny3j 10 місяців тому +3

      Basically blitzkrieg

    • @AL_AFGHANI1
      @AL_AFGHANI1 10 місяців тому

      Nobody asked

    • @stratospheric37
      @stratospheric37 10 місяців тому +1

      @@user-op8fg3ny3j No, what are you talking about

    • @user-oz4nn3jw8p
      @user-oz4nn3jw8p 9 місяців тому +1

      Formidable? Are you kidding me? Turks are originally from central Asia. They lose all the way now Turkey is right beside Europe. Half of old Turks lost to China and mix with Chinese. So call Ottoman "empire" got ass kicked by Vlad the Impaler become Turkish kebab🤣🤣🤣

    • @malinyamato2291
      @malinyamato2291 9 місяців тому +1

      sam as those of Manchuria and the Hussars of Hungary and the Hellenistic Macedonians -- mounted warfare has been instrumental in forming empires, the only exception being the Romans. muslims started out as mounted robbers and emerged towards large armies of mounted looters and robbers -- during that time the adaption of improved stirrups made mounted warfare even more lethal.

  • @AltaicGigachad
    @AltaicGigachad 10 місяців тому +14

    Xin Tangshu 新唐書 (217: 6111) says that the ancestors of Huihe 回紇 (Uiġurs) are the Xiongnu 匈奴 (Huns).

  • @mohamednazirbasharat913
    @mohamednazirbasharat913 10 місяців тому +2

    Great work , thank you.

  • @woodensurfer
    @woodensurfer 9 місяців тому +32

    The Uyghurs have never ruled China. They fought with Tang to suppress AnShi rebellion, and then later they were in a favorable position in extracting trade advantages from a weaken Tang.
    The poet BeiJuYi wrote a vivid poem on how much Tang was willing to exchange for emaciated horses from the Uyghurs.

    • @yangjuguang
      @yangjuguang 9 місяців тому

      for the anti-China propaganda, totally made up history

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      but chinese were scared of Uyghurs that time.
      and they also ruled North part of China, or it's not China?

    • @woodensurfer
      @woodensurfer 9 місяців тому

      A small part of today's China. @@jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh

    • @Han-is-slave
      @Han-is-slave 3 місяці тому +1

      @@jhombyrkotaksorgankazakhcertainly only small part of northwestern . You don’t know the definition and range of North China.

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 3 місяці тому

      @@Han-is-slave It's also included as Northern part.

  • @AltaicGigachad
    @AltaicGigachad 10 місяців тому +22

    Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, shaping the history of Balkans, Islamization of Northern India, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.

    • @AL_AFGHANI1
      @AL_AFGHANI1 10 місяців тому

      Who asked

    • @YusufNasihi
      @YusufNasihi 10 місяців тому +1

      Tarihi çevir nal sesi, kısrak sesi bunlar

    • @edwardsnowden8821
      @edwardsnowden8821 9 місяців тому +2

      Free Kurdistan

    • @sitarampradhan8488
      @sitarampradhan8488 9 місяців тому

      Yeah those Maniacs killed lot of humans, ransacked lot of cities and spread new diseases.

    • @vajraheart6052
      @vajraheart6052 9 місяців тому +3

      Turkic and Turk, the people of Turkey and Ottoman are different and don’t get confused.

  • @reeyees50
    @reeyees50 10 місяців тому +12

    8:00 Manichean religion at that time and place was heavily characterized as being severly blended with Christian beliefs. So these early uyghur ruler could be considered to be a Christian. And if we want to go even further, potential candidate for the prester john myth of later medieval times.

  • @Artur_M.
    @Artur_M. 10 місяців тому +2

    Fascinating topic!

  • @charvaka9526
    @charvaka9526 10 місяців тому +1

    Nice, and great visuals.

  • @nenenindonu
    @nenenindonu 10 місяців тому +16

    The Ilkhanate successor entity of Jalayirids are hypothesized to be remnants of the Uighur Yaglakar clan

    • @nomadenjoyer
      @nomadenjoyer 10 місяців тому +7

      The Jalair
      Possibly of the Turkic ancestry, this group of people were captured by the Timuchin's clan and became vassals. In early days, this group of people raided the pasture of rich Mongol woman, Monolun (wife of the grandson of Bodunchar), and killed her and her eight sons. Only Kaidu was saved by his uncle Nachin and later Kaidu defeated the Jalair to be a leader of the early Mongol people. The Jalairs became very much attached to the Mongol people in the ensuing years. Later, they became vassals and got assimilated Muhuali or Mukali was said to be one of them.
      The Jalairs were said to be of the Darligin Mengwu tribe and fled west to the Kerulen River after being attacked by the Khitans. Alternatively speaking, Jalair (Zha-la-yi-er) was listed together with Zu-bu and Zhu-bu- gu, i.e., Dadan equivalent, in Liao Shi (history of the Khitan Liao dynasty), which were considered a Huihe (Uygur) tribal alliance since the days the Huihe expelled the Kirghiz from the Orkhon River and Tu'ula River area and rebelled against the Khitans throughout the 10th-11th centuries, with Mo-gu-si Khan launching a Zu-bu dynasty in A.D. 1100 in defiance of the Khitans. That is, the Jalair shared the same ancestry as the Keraits who possessed a Nestorian Mo-gu-si (Marcus in Ecclesiastical Chronicle) - who was a different person from Kerait chieftain Wang-han (Toghrul)'s grandfather Margus Buiruk per Historian Zhou Liangxiao for the generations' lapse.

    • @nomadenjoyer
      @nomadenjoyer 10 місяців тому +6

      Other tribes in the region included the Jalair, said to have originated as a band of Turkish refugees, who lived between the Merkits and the Keraits; the Onggirats in the far southeast; and the Ongguts, who at some unknown date had migrated south of the Gobi Desert as far as the borders of China, but still maintained contacts with their relatives further north.

    • @nenenindonu
      @nenenindonu 10 місяців тому +4

      ​@@nomadenjoyerIt would be another case of re-Turkification similar to that of the Naimans, but what's more interesting here is that the Jalayirids were Oghuz Turkified unlike other then-Mongol groups that usually assimilated into Karluk & Kipchak populations

    • @AltaicGigachad
      @AltaicGigachad 10 місяців тому +1

      @@nomadenjoyer The Jalairs were said to be of the Darligin Mengwu tribe and fled west to the Kerulen River after being attacked by the Khitans. Alternatively speaking, Jalair (Zha-la-yi-er) was listed together with Zu-bu and Zhu-bu- gu, i.e., Dadan equivalent, in Liao Shi (history of the Khitan Liao dynasty), which were considered a Huihe (Uygur) tribal alliance since the days the Huihe expelled the Kirghiz from the Orkhon River and Tu'ula River area and rebelled against the Khitans throughout the 10th-11th centuries, with Mo-gu-si Khan launching a Zu-bu dynasty in A.D. 1100 in defiance of the Khitans. That is, the Jalair shared the same ancestry as the Keraits who possessed a Nestorian Mo-gu-si (Marcus in Ecclesiastical Chronicle) - who was a different person from Kerait chieftain Wang-han (Toghrul)'s grandfather Margus Buiruk per Historian Zhou Liangxiao for the generations' lapse.

    • @middleeastrenwarriormen1017
      @middleeastrenwarriormen1017 10 місяців тому +2

      @@nenenindonuNaiman,Oirat,Jalayir,Chuban,Borjigin in Turkmenistan,Iran,Azerbaijan,Iraq,Eastern Syria durring Ilkhanid turned Turkmenization

  • @HistoryoftheUmmah
    @HistoryoftheUmmah 10 місяців тому +20

    May Allah SWT make it easier for our Uyghur brothers and sisters.

    • @charvaka9526
      @charvaka9526 10 місяців тому +4

      Afraid that it won't be Allah. But, hope for better times indeed.

    • @kongwee1978
      @kongwee1978 10 місяців тому +5

      Our uyghur brothers and sister is happy with CPC thanks to Allah.

    • @edwardsnowden8821
      @edwardsnowden8821 9 місяців тому +2

      Free Kurdistan

    • @weishi9804
      @weishi9804 9 місяців тому +1

      It was forced on them with corpse of 1/2 million holy warrior.

    • @peterzou6961
      @peterzou6961 9 місяців тому +1

      Hope they will not be another Pakistan with lots of chaos.

  • @bigsarge2085
    @bigsarge2085 10 місяців тому +2

    Learned something new!

  • @unusualhistorian1336
    @unusualhistorian1336 10 місяців тому +4

    Excellent documentary Hikma, keep it up!

  • @kanatbekdzhanbekuulu1833
    @kanatbekdzhanbekuulu1833 9 місяців тому +15

    I am Kyrgyz and I love my Uyghur brothers ❤❤❤

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 9 місяців тому +1

      Do not believe the lies about Uyghur "genocide", "ethnic cleansing" and "forced labor" .

    • @nicholaskazan275
      @nicholaskazan275 9 місяців тому +2

      You have no idea about your national poem, Manas!

    • @azmatsaypidin1814
      @azmatsaypidin1814 9 місяців тому

      I am uighur and uighurs and kirgiz are brothers.. we are one family..

    • @kanatbekdzhanbekuulu1833
      @kanatbekdzhanbekuulu1833 9 місяців тому +2

      @@nicholaskazan275 oh really than tell me about our Manas poem what’s a relationship between Kyrgyz and Uighur people

    • @azmatsaypidin1814
      @azmatsaypidin1814 9 місяців тому

      @nicholaskazan275 that is great poem collection

  • @tcxnt5442
    @tcxnt5442 10 місяців тому +14

    This title is very misleading, Uyghur Khaganate never ruled any part of China, they were allies of the Tang dynasty and they were not regarded as a threat compared with Tibetans. After the Uyghur Khaganate was destroyed by the Kyrgyz their main branch fled south, trying to intimidate Tang but they were easily crushed by a declining Tang, and all of their people were brought to China and sinicized.

    • @kongwee1978
      @kongwee1978 10 місяців тому +6

      ETIM alway try to twist history in UA-cam.

    • @tcxnt5442
      @tcxnt5442 10 місяців тому +2

      @@kongwee1978 Also, most of the "bribes" decribed in the video was negotiated and settled by the Tang and Uyghurs before the battle. Tang considered paying someone else to fight cost-effective, especially by using the loots from rebellious cities because a large part of China was actually not controlled by Tang and constantly challenging Tang's authority after the Anlushan rebellion.

    • @tcxnt5442
      @tcxnt5442 10 місяців тому +3

      @@kongwee1978 I thought they were going to talk about the "GanZhou Uyghur" Which was a small Kingdom founded by a branch of fleeing Uyghurs who occupied the city of Ganzhou(Zhangye) after the chaotic break up of the Tibetan Empire.

    • @kongwee1978
      @kongwee1978 10 місяців тому +5

      @@tcxnt5442 All these "history" just to serve the "legitimate" right for ETIM to be independent especially in Xinjiang. Just like Kurds in the Middle East.

    • @tcxnt5442
      @tcxnt5442 10 місяців тому

      ​@@kongwee1978 However the Uyghurs are mongoloids and wasn't the indigenous inhabitants of Xinjiang. Muslims wiped off the original Indo-European culture in the Tarim Basin (also the Buddhist and Manichean Uyghurs) is a tragedy should be told

  • @McVaySwifty
    @McVaySwifty 10 місяців тому +1

    Another fascinating doc, thanks!

  • @tawan20082008
    @tawan20082008 10 місяців тому

    thanks

  • @leviturek5015
    @leviturek5015 10 місяців тому +2

    CK2 helped me reconize the names of some of the nations and people you mention lol. Like karluk.

  • @AlMuqaddimahYT
    @AlMuqaddimahYT 10 місяців тому +5

    Why are you uploading at 3 in the morning?!

  • @Cumanshot
    @Cumanshot 10 місяців тому +16

    The noblest of these nations that were not interested in science are the Chinese and the Turks. The Chinese are the largest of the peoples by number, the most imposing by kingdom, and the most considerable by territory. The domains they occupy are in the eastern parts of the inhabited world, between the equinoctial line to the extreme of the seven climates to the north. His share in knowledge (ma'rifa) is to surpass all nations in mastery of handicrafts and perfection of graphic arts. They are the most suffered of men in the prolonged effort, which the improvement of the works [supposes], as well as in enduring the harshness of the penalties in the perfection of the arts (sana'i").
    As for the Turks, [they] also form a great nation with numerous troops and an imposing kingdom. The domains they inhabit are found between the eastern regions of Juräsän, [on the side] of the Islamic empire, the western regions of China, northern India, and the extreme north of the inhabited world. Their virtue is that they stand out and achieve supremacy in doing war, as well as in the elaboration of weapons; for they are the most skilful of men in horsemanship and [warfare] tactics, and the keenest of eyes for spearing, striking with the sword, and shooting arrows.
    Ahmad, A.S. ibn and Salgado, M.F. (1999) Libro de las categorías de las naciones: Vislumbres desde el islam clásico sobre la filosofía y la ciencia. Tres cantos: Akal., p.43

    • @SacredDreamer
      @SacredDreamer 10 місяців тому +1

      Thank You so much for sharing .
      I was drawn in reading every word

    • @edwardsnowden8821
      @edwardsnowden8821 9 місяців тому +2

      Free Kurdistan 😊

  • @layalk.7782
    @layalk.7782 10 місяців тому +1

    Can you please state your sources in the info box.

    • @yangjuguang
      @yangjuguang 9 місяців тому +1

      sources: trust me bro

  • @Resistance_edits
    @Resistance_edits 21 день тому +1

    I was the 1000th like😅🤲🏼♥️

  • @edwingan1988
    @edwingan1988 9 місяців тому +4

    Do one on "When the Red Indians ruled America" 😂

  • @edwardsnowden8821
    @edwardsnowden8821 9 місяців тому +4

    free Kurdistan, Free Kurdistan, Free Kurdistan, Free Kurdistan, Free Kurdistan, free Kurdistan.

    • @papazataklaattiranimam
      @papazataklaattiranimam 9 місяців тому +1

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @edwardsnowden8821
      @edwardsnowden8821 9 місяців тому +1

      @@papazataklaattiranimam Freedom for Kurdistan. long live Xinjiang province.long live Armenia.

  • @papazataklaattiranimam
    @papazataklaattiranimam 10 місяців тому +13

    In short, it is hard to think of any other ethnolinguistic entity in history that conquered so vast a territory and founded so many empires and states, also contributing to world civilizations. The history of the Turkic peoples was an important factor in world history for more than a millennium until the emergence of Europe as the world's dominant power. What happened in the Turkic world often affected the history of China, Central Asia, the Middle East, South Asia, and Europe. One may also argue that world history began with the "Turko-Mongol" empire created by Chinggis Khan. In the contemporary world, Turkic-speaking nations form six states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey/Türkiye) and several "autonomous" units in Russia (the republics of Chuvash, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Altai, Khakassia, Tuva, and Sakha) and China (the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region). Turkic peoples also reside as minority groups in several other countries, including Mongolia and Iran, among others. It would therefore be difficult to acquire a comprehensive understanding of world history as well as our present world without studying the history of the Turkic peoples.

    • @dogukan127
      @dogukan127 10 місяців тому +2

      olm amma circlejerk yapıyorsunuz

    • @edwardsnowden8821
      @edwardsnowden8821 9 місяців тому +1

      FREE KURDISTAN

    • @dirckthedork-knight1201
      @dirckthedork-knight1201 9 місяців тому +1

      The amount of Turkish Ultra Nationalistic butchering of history in this enough to make an observation balloon go to space

    • @jt-ttt
      @jt-ttt 9 місяців тому

      even Mongols have their own writing system, but ... 😂

  • @magma9000
    @magma9000 10 місяців тому +4

    Love from Pakistan 🇵🇰❤️

  • @namAlexander
    @namAlexander 5 місяців тому

    love this channel on arab history instead of twisted history some Muslims come out with some just cant or wont believe real history, this is why i subbed a bit back, if it wasn't for Islamite's or any other people like that and it don't matter what race the world would be a better place, iran seem tobe getting sick of it and other arab states

  • @jvharbin8337
    @jvharbin8337 10 місяців тому

    Great doc full of info

  • @lerneanlion
    @lerneanlion 10 місяців тому +1

    Will you continued into the time of Western Xia and see how the Uyghurs lived their lives under the rule of the Emperors of Western Xia?

  • @arrivederciheheeeeee5809
    @arrivederciheheeeeee5809 10 місяців тому +2

    i should warn you if youre muslim as music is haram as confirmed by many hadiths

  • @AlternityGM
    @AlternityGM 2 місяці тому

    I hope one day that East Turkestan and Tibet regain their independence from China and become free from colonial occupation. I also hope China becomes free from the one-party communist dictatorship.

  • @kesoon88
    @kesoon88 9 місяців тому

    Twisted history

  • @watchshowman9664
    @watchshowman9664 9 місяців тому +1

    since when? btw uyghurs was not even the majority at present area in history. there were many fractions then. they do concentrate at around these territories the last 1000years.. kazahs, kyrgrz,tartars ,tibetans , tufan. They are majority now but not simple majority.

  • @mrmr446
    @mrmr446 10 місяців тому +3

    Manichaeism is derived from Greek so the 'ch' is pronounced as a 'k' which is easier to enunciate, I think the title doesn't need the last word as it could be misleading. An interesting chapter in central Asian history.

  • @aseemawad4294
    @aseemawad4294 8 місяців тому

    Overall Uyghurs have performed a role similar to Cossacks. Not quite Chinese, until brought in the fold by CPC, but serving China as military auxiliary.

  • @anuragpoddar8631
    @anuragpoddar8631 10 місяців тому +2

    How many of y'all heard about genocide of turkic muslims in mid 19th century china that left 5 million people dead?

    • @WarBrickproductions
      @WarBrickproductions 10 місяців тому +2

      I have, the Qing hated anyone who was not Manchu

    • @kazan2081
      @kazan2081 10 місяців тому

      Tell us more.

    • @WarBrickproductions
      @WarBrickproductions 10 місяців тому +3

      @@kazan2081 The qing did a lot of genocides, against many ethnic groups not just the Uyghurs.

    • @kazan2081
      @kazan2081 10 місяців тому

      @WarBrickproductions where can I read more on this. Plus I read the qing were not Chinese but manchu.

    • @WarBrickproductions
      @WarBrickproductions 10 місяців тому

      @@kazan2081 If you look it up you should be able to, maybe look up Qing Genocides or look on Britannica/Wikipedia

  • @alexisdespland4939
    @alexisdespland4939 10 місяців тому

    so the kagans cousin tun was a tons of pain for the kagan. lol

  • @fenrir4269
    @fenrir4269 9 місяців тому

    He’s name is not Bayanchur it’s Bayan-Ochir
    Bayan meaning rich
    Ochir meaning mace or a staff

  • @AltaicGigachad
    @AltaicGigachad 10 місяців тому +7

    The Turks were considered as the best warriors due to their horsemanship and skill in archery.
    Kaushik Roy., n.d. Military Transition in Early Modern Asia, 1400-1750: Cavalry, Guns, Government and Ships (Bloomsbury Studies in Military History). p.24.
    While there is much more than this to the Turks, it is true that Turks rank among history’s great empire-builders and rulers. Under the Ottomans they conquered vast territories in the Balkans and the Middle East and ruled for six hundred years.
    Turkey Country Study Guide Volume 1 Strategic Information and Developments pp.30
    The Turks can be killed, but they can never be conquered.
    Napoleon in his own words from the French of Jules Bertaut p.44

  • @terraminsan7392
    @terraminsan7392 9 місяців тому +2

    Buddhist Uyghurs.

  • @danlhendl
    @danlhendl 10 місяців тому

    How you know all that? I no remembu one ting

  • @dennischai4831
    @dennischai4831 9 місяців тому +2

    Festering discontent is your goal. Why the sudden interest in Uyrghers.

    • @xp8969
      @xp8969 9 місяців тому

      This is a history channel, he covers all sorts of different historical topics

    • @whosthatguy8396
      @whosthatguy8396 19 днів тому

      Festering discontent? UA-cam is banned in china

  • @sahilhossian8212
    @sahilhossian8212 9 місяців тому

    Lore of When Uyghurs Ruled China | Uyghur Khaganate Documentary momentum 100

  • @angerycamel2
    @angerycamel2 10 місяців тому +1

    What part of this video actually shows a Uygher conquest or rule of china? Terrible tittle for the video.

  • @chacri08
    @chacri08 9 місяців тому +2

    I love Dilraba Dilmurat

  • @jeremyhanton4467
    @jeremyhanton4467 9 місяців тому

    Its a shame that they live in their current situation with 0 support from the umah

  • @albertwong1919
    @albertwong1919 9 місяців тому +1

    The future of XInjiang is forever tied to China as it is with Taiwan. There is no way and its impossible for Xinjiang to be an autonomous state not even like Hong Kong as a one country two system pledge since Xinjiang was never autonomous and the entire region is in a very important location with rich mineral resources to be an autonomous state.
    If Xinjiang ever become an autonomous region that what is happening now in the Ukraine war will happen to Xinjiang because its 100% certain that the US thru the CIA will destabilize and than put in their people in Xinjiang for independence and this will be a very bad situation for China and I dont think the chinese leaders are stupid or shortsighted to not see this and understand this possibility.

  • @badmashdogesh3939
    @badmashdogesh3939 9 місяців тому +4

    Your title is quite misleading. Uyghurs never ruled China. They only controlled parts of modern China, not Tang China. Tang was battling internal rebellions at the time, which significantly weakened the empire, and the Uyghurs just took advantage of this weak Tang.

  • @rolandrabier5984
    @rolandrabier5984 9 місяців тому +4

    Had the Uyghurs chosen Shamanism, Buddhism or Christianity they would not be seen as trouble makers and could blend easely in today China.

    • @kamer-sing
      @kamer-sing 9 місяців тому

      the troublemakers are American Christians, China's biggest enemy, and Christians will never live in China.

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      Being Muslim is saving them from that shit.
      but in Central Asia they separating and assimilating by other Muslims

  • @venture7025
    @venture7025 9 місяців тому

    The Mogolian was more powerful ruling some parts of Europe, Central Asia, China. Has China targeted the Mogolian?

  • @subhranshuganguly2246
    @subhranshuganguly2246 9 місяців тому +1

    One thing is certain. Traditional Chinese emperors were more powerful than Hindus. They did not bow down to Turks nor Europeans.

    • @brianticas7671
      @brianticas7671 6 місяців тому

      Please the Chinese always got beat up man. Gtfo here man.

  • @zacharylewis6108
    @zacharylewis6108 9 місяців тому +1

    Xi Xia. Never ruled all of China. The Han & Jurchens kept them in check. And the theres Dali Kingdom.

  • @wsmithe2209
    @wsmithe2209 9 місяців тому +1

    This is really full of it with brown sheets. Don't waste of time here, folks.

  • @teslavu9426
    @teslavu9426 9 місяців тому

    💘 💘 💘

  • @vedatduman5072
    @vedatduman5072 9 місяців тому +1

    Sultan Ertuğrul söğüte 400 çadırla geldi osmanli imparatorlugunu kurdu İstanbul da çindeki gibi bir set değil üç set vardı gemiler karadan yürütüldü uygurlar üç Oğuzlar bizler dokuz Oğuzlar tabiki kurulacak ama herseyin bir zamanı var kurt yediği ayazı asla unutmaz

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 8 місяців тому +1

      Tokuz Oghuz aren't Oghuz ...
      they were Uyghurs, just Oghuz khan call them Tokuz Oghuz

  • @duyanning
    @duyanning 9 місяців тому +1

    那个时候维吾尔人还不是穆斯林,也不是农耕民族。

  • @LimeyRedneck
    @LimeyRedneck 10 місяців тому

    🤠💜

  • @lewdtwitch3424
    @lewdtwitch3424 10 місяців тому +1

    they never did

  • @fiyangga.yanggiri-hala
    @fiyangga.yanggiri-hala 9 місяців тому +1

    I'm from Manchuria and i love their history and people.
    Please perceive your own tradition and culture. 🙏

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 9 місяців тому +1

      You're from Heilongjiang, China.
      The Man-chu rulers incorporated their territory with that of China.

    • @Li.Meng.
      @Li.Meng. 9 місяців тому

      满洲是个嘚!

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      I like Manchurians, but I hate you guy lost your language and replace it with mandarin

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 9 місяців тому

      @@jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      Not true.
      Mongol Man-chu language is still spoken and taught in schools.

  • @ruggedindividual708
    @ruggedindividual708 9 місяців тому +1

    Free the Uyghurs

  • @josephineberlin67
    @josephineberlin67 9 місяців тому +1

    The Qing dynasty time lands reaches to the turkey habitations

    • @teovu5557
      @teovu5557 9 місяців тому +1

      To Turkey? hell no, what history you reading?
      Or do you mean reaches to Turkic speaking regions like western china and parts of central asia?
      Turkey/Turkish are not the same thing as Eastern Turks.

  • @blacksheepdog6969
    @blacksheepdog6969 9 місяців тому +2

    my mom is from xinjiang. people there are really tough and love to fight.

  • @User-xyxklyntrw
    @User-xyxklyntrw 9 місяців тому +2

    Uyghur anchestors were from Sino Tibetan at ancient yellow river valley Civilization that get a little mutation because migrate to different kind of terrain and climate for long generations. What happen in the past actually unification of big family that splitted thousand years before.

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      🤣🤣🤣
      Uyghur ancestors were Altaic...
      And modern day Uyghurs have some Indo European mix and Ancient Uyghur

    • @User-xyxklyntrw
      @User-xyxklyntrw 9 місяців тому

      @@jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh I know , but it closely related to ancient Civilization society of China yellow river basin, do u think human came from stone, human came from human, closed to them, a little bit mutation are not mean the Difference and separate them, i give u example one clumps of grass with one root, one blade of grass of it green color, and blade of grass of it yellow, does it mean they are differences make them different in root, no, they still one clumps of grass with one same root. U don't know they was closely related to ancient Chinese yellow river valley Civilization, that why they live as neighbour because they actually family. If u just cut the scene of only 1000 year ago u said this is different kingdom, but if u see further u will understand they live so closed because they related so close before as family, and now they back to be a family, so why want distract that harmony, don't, let they live peacefully, they deserve it.

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      @@User-xyxklyntrw They aren't related to chinese, you just assimilating their genome

  • @vx8431
    @vx8431 10 місяців тому

    Didn't the last Khagane kill himself? Wasn't Khagane Hu the last legitimate Khan and Öge just a pretender who grabbed the throne after his suicide to then lose the Empire to the Tang and Kyrgiz?

  • @beepboop204
    @beepboop204 10 місяців тому

  • @AllAboutMMA
    @AllAboutMMA 6 місяців тому

    Are ughurs descendants of mongols?

  • @jasemalhammadi4228
    @jasemalhammadi4228 10 місяців тому +8

    There are also the Han chinese muslims which are called “Hui people” who converted to islam through persian merchants who traveled up the silk road to China. they have a distinct culture within china and the chinese government is less hostile to the them than the Uighurs. It’s worth learning about their history.

    • @Alejandro-te2nt
      @Alejandro-te2nt 10 місяців тому

      The videos of hui dhikr on youtube are very cool.

    • @xyz-hx5dh
      @xyz-hx5dh 10 місяців тому

      If Muslim collaborate with foreign enemies to destabilise the country then country will be hostile to such people .

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 9 місяців тому

      False and fake news.
      PRC government is not "hostile" towards Muslim ethnic groups.

    • @parttimethinker7611
      @parttimethinker7611 9 місяців тому +1

      It’s because they (Hui) helped the Chinese emperor defeated the invading forces. They were hailed as great contributors to the China. The Chinese emperor built 2 great mosques in commemorate of their contributions to defend China. It’s like the U.S., after the “black American “ helped the Union side fought the southerner ( rebels). And ww2, the black American were granted recognition as important. Even though they were still heavily discriminated against by the white American. Everyone appreciates friendship, no matter which race of country.

  • @user-ks3bh1xe5q
    @user-ks3bh1xe5q 9 місяців тому +1

    The region in question was occupied by the powerful Dzungar Empire. When the latter was defeated and decimated by the Ching (Manchu) Empire, Han Chinese, Uyghurs, and other minorities were brought in to settle on the conquered lands, henceforth, known as XinJiang (New Territory).

  • @teovu5557
    @teovu5557 9 місяців тому +2

    they never ruled "China" they ruled Mongolia(Uyghur Khaganate) and later ruled small kingdoms in Gangsu, China(Ganzhou Uyghur Kingdom) after the Kirghiz kicked them out of Mongolia region.. lol

    • @RandomGuy-df1oy
      @RandomGuy-df1oy 9 місяців тому +2

      They ruled large portion of modern day China and extracted annual tribute from Tang time to time, not as much as the Gokturks though

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      why all say kyrgyz kicked them?
      kyrgyz pay for Uyghurs for 100 years how can they kick Uyghurs?
      They attacked with Karluks, Chinese against Uyghurs...

  • @shashajoe10
    @shashajoe10 9 місяців тому +1

    Uyghur khganate never rule china..you are much more a liar giving disinformation...uyghur khaganate was once rule kazakhstan and central asia but they were defeated in central asia
    Uyghur like many hazara were alll buddhism before they were defeated by muslim

  • @samwill7259
    @samwill7259 10 місяців тому +2

    One of the ideas that keeps me up at night is wondering how many Uyghurs there will even be left by the time I die. No one is stopping China, not anytime soon

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 9 місяців тому +2

      False and fake news.
      Uyghurs population in China continue to grow.

    • @parttimethinker7611
      @parttimethinker7611 9 місяців тому

      You need to worry about the Muslim population in India as well. Muslim ruled India for over 1200 years. Islam was the predominant religion in India. Now, only about 19% of Indian population are Muslim. Wonder how many Muslim will be left in India when you take your last breath? They’re openly killing Muslim in India now. They’re openly burning the Koran in Sweden now? Türkiye was bribed with financial aids by the U.S. , therefore they (Türkiye ) signed the deal to help the Swede joining NATO. Can Islam be bought?

    • @charmingsmile9301
      @charmingsmile9301 9 місяців тому +1

      The population of Uyghurs in China is 12 million people

    • @samwill7259
      @samwill7259 9 місяців тому

      @@charmingsmile9301 Cool, they are activley being placed in concentration camps. What is your point.
      Also, NFT avatar, opinion discarded.

  • @ShadyAli17
    @ShadyAli17 10 місяців тому +1

    Yesterdays oppressors are tommorows victims.

  • @shaifunnessa7816
    @shaifunnessa7816 10 місяців тому +1

    Georgia vs Seljuk battle of didgori how Georgia defeated Seljuk please make video

  • @ruggedindividual708
    @ruggedindividual708 10 місяців тому +1

    Real Turks.
    Ps great thumbnail

  • @user-ue6ww6ut6j
    @user-ue6ww6ut6j 9 місяців тому +1

    维吾尔人不是突厥人的后裔,我们的史书有明确的记载,甚至和还和唐朝并肩作战,共同抵抗过突厥人

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      They were not Turk but language was Turkic...
      and they fought against Turk because of territorial conflicts

  • @shaifunnessa7816
    @shaifunnessa7816 10 місяців тому

    Georgia vs Seljuk turk how Georgia defeated Seljuk please make video

  • @Anwari_khatun
    @Anwari_khatun 10 місяців тому +1

    Plz wake up uyghur muslim😢☪️

  • @RebelKitty338
    @RebelKitty338 10 місяців тому +3

    First off thank you for your channel and I'm always excited for your content.
    As for your question not as long as CCP are in power. I could see this eventually happening in a dissolution of modern China, but as it stands right now any ethnic group with particularly strong religious leanings are incompatible with the Maoist hegemony. The only religion ultimately acceptable is worship of the State.

    • @kongwee1978
      @kongwee1978 10 місяців тому

      China for 2000 years is never a religious rule country. We have no problem reading chinese text from Qin Dynasty unlike all other civilization. We can even read Shang and Zhou text which is 3000 years ago. We have confucius study that improving society rather than after life in all religion. We don't wait from heaven to save us in face of thousands year of conflicts and calamates fall upon us.

    • @tcxnt5442
      @tcxnt5442 10 місяців тому +4

      But over 98%of people in China don't have strong religious leanings and the concept of strong religious leaning is foreign to most ethinic groups in China

    • @RebelKitty338
      @RebelKitty338 10 місяців тому

      @tcxnt5442 Buddhism? Daoism? Islam alone accounts for 2%, Christians 3, Daoism for 4-10, and Buddhism roughly 20% of the population. According to CIA World Factbook roughly 50% of the entire population are religious and that's with open persecution: www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/about/archives/2021/field/religions/#:~:text=China,51.8%25%20(2020%20est.)

    • @edwardsnowden8821
      @edwardsnowden8821 9 місяців тому +4

      Free Kurdistan

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 9 місяців тому

      False and fake news.
      Neither the PRC or ROC have State religion.
      PRC citizens are free to believe any religion.
      Both PRC and ROC are against separatism ...it will not succeed.

  • @xp8969
    @xp8969 9 місяців тому

    China spent a lot of money programming all the bots here in the comment section to throw hissy fits lol, and the best part is every angry comment promotes this vid in the algorithm so more people see it 😂😂

  • @paulroese1376
    @paulroese1376 6 місяців тому

    other than snits and giggles what is the point of studying any of these groups? did they develop Cold Fusion or discover the cure for cancer? what scientific or technological advances did any of these folks leave as a legacy? what contributions to the Arts did any of them make? great paintings, plays, poetry, symphonies? can someone explain how the study of these people is relevant for those of us living in the present? their history just seems to be a never ending parade of warlords and aggression. no rise of democratic republics or industrial revolutions or Renaissance! i do feel bad that they are persecuted for their ethnicity and religious faith by the PRC.

  • @kongwee1978
    @kongwee1978 10 місяців тому +7

    In the end, Xinjiang uyghur is happy with CPC. All muslim countries support this too.

  • @fredtan1506
    @fredtan1506 9 місяців тому

    😂😂😂

  • @xrc5540
    @xrc5540 9 місяців тому +1

    You are spreading fake history, no you do not convince me or scholars on the existence of such a situation. Shameful introduction.

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 8 місяців тому +1

      Uyghurs ruled Northern China real

    • @AllAboutMMA
      @AllAboutMMA 6 місяців тому

      Can u prove that it s not real

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 6 місяців тому +1

      Uyghur named Hala bashi ruled chinese ming dynasty..
      ge have around 5 thousand remnants in Hunnan province, his remnants are also Uyghurs but more chinised

    • @xrc5540
      @xrc5540 6 місяців тому

      @@jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh Bullcrap.

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 6 місяців тому +1

      @@xrc5540 Hala Bashi is a king of Idikut Uyghur Kocho Kingdom.
      he ruled Ming dynasty, go check Google.
      even man who invented Paper in china was Uyghur man, who was later executed for his knowledge.
      Chinese stole his recipe making paper

  • @HDsharp
    @HDsharp 9 місяців тому +1

    Stop spreading lies!!!

    • @xp8969
      @xp8969 9 місяців тому

      Which part of this video is a lie?
      And what is your source for the truth?

    • @AllAboutMMA
      @AllAboutMMA 6 місяців тому

      Can u prove?

    • @HDsharp
      @HDsharp 6 місяців тому

      @@xp8969 the Uyghurs are enjoying a renaissance. They're thriving and not being oppressed at all. Go and see for yourself when you visit their state! Massive investments have been poured into their region. So the BS from the west is real!

    • @xp8969
      @xp8969 6 місяців тому

      @@HDsharp fake news, nice try tho nazi

  • @khtan585
    @khtan585 9 місяців тому +1

    Propaganda galore ❤

    • @xp8969
      @xp8969 9 місяців тому

      Which part of this video is a lie?
      And what is your source for the truth?

    • @khtan585
      @khtan585 9 місяців тому

      @@xp8969 one knows a propaganda without needing a source exactly like what the programme has attempted to do.

    • @xp8969
      @xp8969 9 місяців тому

      @@khtan585 your feelings aren't a source bro
      That's why facts don't care about your feelings

    • @khtan585
      @khtan585 9 місяців тому

      @@xp8969 propaganda are not facts based and definitely not a reliable source, very much like the programme.

  • @princevelkan295
    @princevelkan295 10 місяців тому +1

    So Uighyurs are same peoples as Mongols & Turks? Their culture & way of life almost similar

    • @edwardsnowden8821
      @edwardsnowden8821 9 місяців тому +1

      Free Kurdistan

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      Not similar.
      Modern day Uyghurs culture is a riched by Karakhanid Karluk culture.
      But yes, it's Turkic

  • @alexisdespland4939
    @alexisdespland4939 10 місяців тому

    i hope this never ha[pens but china mite try and block this video

  • @boldbadaa1800
    @boldbadaa1800 10 місяців тому

    Uigars is not turkic it s Sogdian culter frame in Mongolia

    • @RandomGuy-df1oy
      @RandomGuy-df1oy 9 місяців тому +2

      wtf nonesense are you spitting? Uyghurs are Turkic for sure, Mongolia was a Turkic land and Sogdians and Mongolic people were just subjects

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      Culture is influenced.
      all modern day Turkic people have Sogdian elements, cause Sogdians were Silk Road man

  • @Nxb9ch
    @Nxb9ch 10 місяців тому +1

    In Sha Allah,
    Caliphate will be reestablished soon

    • @charvaka9526
      @charvaka9526 10 місяців тому +3

      Nobody needs another caliphate. A constitutional republic with Human rights is preferable.

    • @kongwee1978
      @kongwee1978 10 місяців тому +3

      @@charvaka9526 CIA will grant this caliphate.

    • @edwardsnowden8821
      @edwardsnowden8821 9 місяців тому +1

      Free Kurdistan

    • @charvaka9526
      @charvaka9526 9 місяців тому

      @kongwee1978 What might this ever mean? Clue?

  • @azumishimizu1880
    @azumishimizu1880 9 місяців тому +1

    Shows you the Uyghurs always belonged to China.

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      Uyghurs always ruled chinese.
      they banned them to eat bugs, hundred years Chinese wait.
      and now they can freely eat Bugs and Scorpions

    • @azumishimizu1880
      @azumishimizu1880 9 місяців тому +1

      @@jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      Other way around, Google: Conquest of the Western Turks

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому

      @@azumishimizu1880 Uyghurs wanted autonomy from Turkic general.
      Not only Uyghurs fought against Turkic khanate, also Karluks which are Turkic tribe they fought against Turkic khanate.

    • @azumishimizu1880
      @azumishimizu1880 9 місяців тому

      @@jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh China conquered them all

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      china used them to win

  • @pooi-hoongchan8680
    @pooi-hoongchan8680 9 місяців тому +1

    BS fake video

  • @alvinchua5211
    @alvinchua5211 9 місяців тому

    What nonsensical disinformation

  • @hanumanbattambang9347
    @hanumanbattambang9347 9 місяців тому

    So Uyghurs are Chinese! Now you all NOT LIKE CHINESE RULES. Who would have thought CHINESE WILL NOT LIKE CHINESE RULES? Ha!…Sad to be Uyghurs; I DO NOT FEEL SORRY FOR YOU!

  • @semanadelherrero
    @semanadelherrero 9 місяців тому +1

    The Uighurs came from the Arab Empire 1,500 years ago. It was during the Tang Dynasty in China. The earliest ancestors were the Uyghurs. They had nothing to do with the Turks, and they had nothing to do with them genetically. They were closer to the genes of Europa and Central Asia. Mixed race, so what you said is complete nonsense.

    • @papazataklaattiranimam
      @papazataklaattiranimam 9 місяців тому

      😂😂😂

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      What Arab?
      Do Arabs have R1a, R1b, J2a M7706?
      Uyghurs population has Native Central Asian ancestry, not arab.
      they never marry Arabs

    • @semanadelherrero
      @semanadelherrero 9 місяців тому +1

      @@jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 😂You have to know that the Arabs at that time included not only Arabs in a large area of ​​​​the Middle East. There are historical records that the Uighurs migrated from the Middle East.

    • @semanadelherrero
      @semanadelherrero 9 місяців тому +1

      @@papazataklaattiranimam It seems that you don’t know much about the history of the Middle East. The Arab Empire in history was very large and included many ethnic groups. Children, if you don’t understand history, study hard.

    • @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh
      @jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh 9 місяців тому +1

      @@semanadelherrero All humans migrated from Middle East, but no-one is Arab.
      Uyghurs genetically related to Central Asian, you can check their gedmatch.
      The closest population is Hazara, next uzbek, nogai etc.

  • @almurabitun
    @almurabitun 9 місяців тому

    The Uyghurs that settled in present day Uyghurstan actually migrated there and mixed with the indigenous people the Tocharians who were an Asiatic light skinned people with ginger hair or blonde and brown hair and pale skin.

  • @ashfifidontcare4064
    @ashfifidontcare4064 10 місяців тому +2

    This dude paints himself as an honest historian but always gives biased analysis and or leaves out information. Hard pass

  • @jeong-eunking5981
    @jeong-eunking5981 9 місяців тому +2

    what time Uyghurs ruled China,Could you tell me the time?This channel is a nonsense channel