Getting Your Head Around Wing Ratings

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @jissanboermans5009
    @jissanboermans5009 4 роки тому +2

    Noob in training here and looking to buy my gear. Your timing in releasing this video is amazing. I swear I asked myself "what should I be looking for?" Yesterday.

  • @roberteshelman5917
    @roberteshelman5917 4 роки тому +1

    Nice explanation of wing ratings. Thanks for posting!

  • @kevindriver9375
    @kevindriver9375 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks Matt for putting on these videos.
    Blue Skies!

  • @Bob_just_Bob
    @Bob_just_Bob 4 роки тому

    Thanks for the explanation of the ratings systems. Very informative and interesting. I appreciate you taking the time to put this information up there. For a newbie to this type of flying it was very helpful.

  • @mbrunnme
    @mbrunnme 4 роки тому

    One of the best paramotoring channels on youtube. Keep putting out this content, you guys are going places! And thank you!

  • @lobbyrobby
    @lobbyrobby Рік тому

    Great information. Thank you

  • @BryanPearsonParamotor
    @BryanPearsonParamotor 4 роки тому +2

    Awesome info. Thanks Matt!

  • @brandonnonya3680
    @brandonnonya3680 4 роки тому

    Glad you made this, I've been looking at new gliders. I'm currently flying a velocity edge 30m. I've been flying it for 3 years. Im interested in the u-turn blacklight 2 but I'm apprehensive about it because of the High EN-B rating. It's my understanding that it will require more active piloting.

    • @midwestpoweredparagliding2706
      @midwestpoweredparagliding2706  4 роки тому

      Here's a nice article about the Blacklight (I?) Might be 1 version deprecated, but worth reading. It is indeed a very high B glider. No trim on the risers also, if you weren't aware of that free flight / motoring common difference. www.dhv.de/fileadmin/user_upload/aktuell_zu_halten/Englische_Seite/serialtests_5_pics.pdf

  • @zdajalinikoli
    @zdajalinikoli 2 роки тому

    Well, thank you, one remark: the EN rating is done by self-induced colapses in absolutely quiet air. The behavoir in turbulent air is NOT tested, and there are tricks to sqieeze a glider into a lower rating, and it makes sense to wait this to come out at others. I would NEVER buy a glider just after its product launch.

  • @rogangranite
    @rogangranite 2 роки тому

    Thanks

  • @DougBow96
    @DougBow96 4 роки тому +1

    Great info, thank you!

  • @emcfar99
    @emcfar99 4 роки тому +1

    You mention the EN ratings don't take into account the weight of the motor, but all EN rated wings I've seen indicate the weight range. Can you expand on what you mean? I feel obtuse...
    My first PPG flight was last April, and I earned my P2 a few months later, so not trying to argue; seeking to understand.
    My perspective: If I try and put my motor on my PG wing, I'm way above my all-up weight. If folks account for their all-up flying weight (all gear, motor, wing, water, sunscreen, go pro, Instacam, strobe, hamburgers, milk, TP, camping gear, etc.) when selecting a wing, is the first breakdown of the system still legit? The efficiency difference piece makes a lot of sense.

    • @emcfar99
      @emcfar99 3 роки тому

      Took awhile, but Steve at the Salton Sea explained some nuances and rationale around EN PG vs DGAC, and the dynamics/testing challenges with a motor. I understand a bit better now.

  • @grahamlockley4435
    @grahamlockley4435 3 роки тому

    I wish there were more factual vids like this out there rather than the 'OMG you will die on any other wing' that certain people seem pump out. Not a citizen of the USA but if I was I would be hotfooting over to your school for training.

  • @ripmanridin7092
    @ripmanridin7092 4 роки тому

    Excellent info!

  • @vonmuller6577
    @vonmuller6577 3 роки тому

    Good job!

  • @m72m72
    @m72m72 2 роки тому

    you say wrong definition Aspect Ratio !!!