AUSA 2021: 360 Invictus (FARA)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 30

  • @Mediiiicc
    @Mediiiicc 3 роки тому +4

    I don't like the idea of giving BOTH contracts to the same company but Bell has really knocked it out of the park with their FARA & FLRAA designs.

    • @georgewaters8592
      @georgewaters8592 2 роки тому

      Hard not to agree with this statement which you have made here.

  • @frediejovellano8666
    @frediejovellano8666 Рік тому

    God bless you Brotherhood for cost for Gods Plan for US!!

  • @RemnantVince80
    @RemnantVince80 3 роки тому +2

    Bell's V280 + invictus for the win.

  • @Condor1970
    @Condor1970 3 роки тому +1

    I think once the Raider X proves to be good for Recon, Sikorsky will eventually unveil the secret project they are working on in conjunction to Defiant X. They haven't said much about it, but it will be the heavy attack version to replace Apache for heavy open battlefield combat. It's the Defiant X drivetrain/engine compatible twin seat Attack only variant.

  • @kimkristensen2816
    @kimkristensen2816 3 роки тому +4

    Looked better with the ductet tail rotor

    • @PpAirO5
      @PpAirO5 3 роки тому +2

      Agree. I love the ducted rotor concept (Finestron) developed by the french 👍

  • @Yuki_Ika7
    @Yuki_Ika7 2 роки тому

    I am still hoping that the raider and defiant get the contracts but bell's options are pretty good too

  • @IYKYK97
    @IYKYK97 3 роки тому

    So finally a helo + Jet had a baby

  • @Tyr1001
    @Tyr1001 3 роки тому +2

    the videos showed the helicopter with a fenestron but the floor model (mockup?) had a conventional tail rotor. Was the design changed or did they just not have to fenestron model ready to display?

    • @bl8danjil
      @bl8danjil 3 роки тому +1

      News articles say they are going with a conventional tail rotor based on their 525 Relentless because it is proven. I would have preferred the fan tail though.

    • @bryanrussell6679
      @bryanrussell6679 3 роки тому +2

      @@bl8danjil
      They also made the switch to help shed some weight. I suspect this helicopter will struggle to maintain 180 knots air speed. I really liked the looks of this helicopter, but changing the tail just makes it seem less special now. There's no telling what else they'll have to change before it's said and done. Plus I think the Sikorsky Raider is going to be really tough competition.

    • @bl8danjil
      @bl8danjil 3 роки тому +2

      @@bryanrussell6679 The Raider and Defiant just don't seem ready yet. They are just now trying to upscale up to full size and the testing is behind Bell's offering. If the Army really needs a scout helicopter now, then the Invictus is it.

    • @bryanrussell6679
      @bryanrussell6679 3 роки тому +2

      @@bl8danjil
      That's just it, the army doesn't plan to actually start implementing these until 2030. Bell hasn't even finished building a flying model of the Invictus yet. The V280 is the one that they're ahead of schedule with.

    • @bl8danjil
      @bl8danjil 3 роки тому +1

      @@bryanrussell6679 Bell is building a conventional helicopter. The only thing that was kind of iffy was the Fenestron tail rotor which they switched away from. Meanwhile, sikorsky is treading into unfamiliar territory. If the Army really needed to field a scout helo sooner, the Invictus is the best bet and not the Raider.

  • @georgewaters8592
    @georgewaters8592 2 роки тому

    Man, this so reminds me of the RAH 66 Comanche, too bad Sikorsky is not making that aircraft today, as it's now the right helicopter at the right time.

  • @tiborpinter2373
    @tiborpinter2373 2 роки тому

    Bell 360 Invictus ebből a helikopterből egy nyolc darab kellene a magyar államnak és hadseregnek a Mi-8 helyett elavultak még akkor is hogy kicsit felújították őket.