This is John Freeman, Carl Jung's interviewer, he interviewed Carl 18 months before Carl G. Jung had died, producing the best 39 minutes interview ever recorded for Jung, u can find it on UA-cam. Later, when Carl decided for the first time to write a book presenting part of his idea's to the general public, he choose a a few trusted men to aid him in this book, all of them were psychology specialists and editors of books, except for John Freeman, who later decided to read the book for us.. I appreciate this audio so much....
@@HeartFelt520 No, the AUDIBLE READER is a man named DENNIS ROONEY. John Freeman wrote the INTRODUCTION to the book. He is NOT the narrator/audible reader.
The voice of this reader is decent...It would have been a little better if he wasn't so monotone though. But he is certainly not the worst audible reader I have personally experienced...He definitely "gets the job done" so to speak.
If one must learn, go to the masters. Or recognised source, a starting point, that’s trusted. How lucky we are getting it from the horses mouth. The word, privileged springs to mind. Many thanks UA-cam.
1:42:00 - 1:46:03 Why should we bother with evidence? - if we add salt to our food without knowing why, it will still contribute to our well-being ;;; the denial of religious truth is as impossible to prove as the assertion
Modern man's rationalism, which has destroyed his capacity to respond to numinous symbols and ideas, has put him at mercy of the psychic underworld - he has freed himself from superstition (so he beliefs), but in the process, has lost his spiritual values to a positively dangerous degree.
WOW!! What an extraordinary book so far ("Approaching The Unconcious")** written by Carl G. Jung himself. I wish I had read this EARLIER in my life! Astounding! **As of this comment, I haven't gotten to the rest of the essays yet.
I appreciate gaining these insights into our shared psychology. I see the african has been very important in the development of this knowledge for the consumption of western minds. I also see the efforts Jung makes to distance the african from knowledge already in his possession before his interactions with the West. I See that Jungs, teachers were black.
You see what you WANT to see! You're completely obsessed (Or should I say POSSESED) by the concept of "Race" Being black is everything to you. When, in REALITY being Black, White or Asian has basically NOTHING to do with it! Ahhhhhhh small minded indeed!
I'm just trying to figure out what my dream meant I had in my childhood.. I woke up at night terrified, the wall next to my bed had words written in fire " I am your one and only God and you shall only serve me" and it ended with an eye opening and looking around my room and closing taking the words with it ..I screamed for my dad and told him everything... I had a religious upbringing so I assume it has something to do with that..but what really bothered me Is that it wasn't in my native language, and I couldn't formulate my own sentences in English back then...but I knew what the words on the wall meant Anyway as I got older getting involved in online debates I ironically identified myself as atheist.. no watching Dr Peterson videos I can't say I'm atheist but don't believe in an all knowing being as the Christians portray him to be... Would actually be interesting if someone can give their opinion on it? Is it because of my religious upbringing?
As Carl Jung expresses, the person who can make the most meaning of the symbols is the person who dreamt them himself, however this is my take based on the information given. First you mention the words written in fire followed by an eye looking around your room and taking the words of fire with it. You mentioned having a religious upbringing, I believe this is the core meaning behind the dream. The eye that observes the room and takes the words might’ve been your unconscious self realization of the effect religion was having on you. how that relates to you I’m not sure but maybe it has something to do with not feeling spiritually aligned with Christianity? As for how you understood what the words of fire meant I believe that has to do with the fact that it was a dream and the words did not hold a literal meaning just symbolic meaning. You might not have known how to read or write at the time, but I get the impression you knew how to speak. At this level of understanding, would it be right to assume that you at least knew that words are things that people use to convey things they want to say? Note: Not a certified psychologist though I’m planning to be, I read Carl Jung and stuff as a hobby. Hope this helps!
Read Quran, Bhagavad Gita, Tibetan Book of the Dead, Tao Te Ching And Carl Yung. Over and over until you here the words for what they are, not how it hyped up your dream. As salamu alaykum brothers and sisters. Good luck on your straight path 🙏🏻
@@jonathanmoore5619 Incorrect. Only one ARROGANT dummie here. I was merely pointing ☝️ it out. When you have nothing to say, best say nothing at all. Farewell 👋
anyone experiencing heavy allegorical and not ironic, i'm sure, if not then it be an absolutely miraculous (hey i spelled that correctly for the first time maybe ever on the first time through,,,woah heart emoji) and so coincidental that it's not coincidental at ALL but as the man explains himself in his work, seemingly both,as his published memory put as self 1 and 2) that is to say that his work is of that way that through i assume man and his symbols can speak to man and his symbols from across time through man (current awareness of self) and his symbols (or language as i've been rudimentary/workingly referring to it as) ,, now i'm very new to this miraculous (im told miraculouIS-ness) works , and am only retroactively still awestruck awespiciously as i look-over-edit-tastefully add detail/channel more and only worked (as over in my mind and in the awareness he speaks of as a patient's dream about a fourth of his book of memories.etc. (as rilke calls fragments in referance (my affinity for the visiting about france where rilke stayed and dance makes me spell that, THAT WAY) to beloved JP (or IP) Jacobsen..or is it son) it seems allegorical just in it's 12 dreams and potential of disciple refer-dances in the light of westerns christian tradition, and that of new thought authors as the genre police would call them one of which i reference Neville Goddard's 12 diciplines . among many my conciousness let slip as i let slip my metaphoric and in somewhat physical literal and literary tongue
The voice of this reader is so good, perfect.
This is John Freeman, Carl Jung's interviewer, he interviewed Carl 18 months before Carl G. Jung had died, producing the best 39 minutes interview ever recorded for Jung, u can find it on UA-cam.
Later, when Carl decided for the first time to write a book presenting part of his idea's to the general public, he choose a a few trusted men to aid him in this book, all of them were psychology specialists and editors of books, except for John Freeman, who later decided to read the book for us..
I appreciate this audio so much....
@@HeartFelt520 No, the AUDIBLE READER is a man named DENNIS ROONEY. John Freeman wrote the INTRODUCTION to the book. He is NOT the narrator/audible reader.
The voice of this reader is decent...It would have been a little better if he wasn't so monotone though. But he is certainly not the worst audible reader I have personally experienced...He definitely "gets the job done" so to speak.
@@HeartFelt520 23:24
1:07:44 man, it was getting really good here
Yeah, what happened? ☹️
There is a link to acproper part 4 in a different comment
If one must learn, go to the masters. Or recognised source, a starting point, that’s trusted. How lucky we are getting it from the horses mouth. The word, privileged springs to mind. Many thanks UA-cam.
Delegate to an expert. The wise old man.
1:42:00 - 1:46:03
Why should we bother with evidence? - if we add salt to our food without knowing why, it will still contribute to our well-being ;;; the denial of religious truth is as impossible to prove as the assertion
Modern man's rationalism, which has destroyed his capacity to respond to numinous symbols and ideas, has put him at mercy of the psychic underworld - he has freed himself from superstition (so he beliefs), but in the process, has lost his spiritual values to a positively dangerous degree.
The soul of man 1:35:50
The role of symbols 1:56:26
Halfway through, this loops back to the previous video. wtf
ua-cam.com/video/BDnQn84cEe0/v-deo.html
@@muwinjijg9877 Thank you!
ty
The sole of man 1:35:55
Yes
1:08:00 end of The Role Of Symbols (int)
More like parts 3-2 :/
WOW!! What an extraordinary book so far ("Approaching The Unconcious")** written by Carl G. Jung himself. I wish I had read this EARLIER in my life! Astounding!
**As of this comment, I haven't gotten to the rest of the essays yet.
....multi stiu putini cunosc ...to Sir with love 👍🤗👌
ua-cam.com/video/_86Gm9iclAg/v-deo.html ....nu iti poti inchipui cunoscatorule cat am cautat sunetele astea prin inconstient, sa fi si tu iubit 👌 :)
I read this book ❤ funny though everyone has stopped talking to me now because of the things that have taken over our world now ❤
Remember Carol ~
The DEVIL runs the playground 🌎
YET
GOD runs the BUILDING 🌟🌎🌟
And that's what matters!
Are they talking to you again yet?
No they aren’t talking to me yet
@@carolannshepherd2189Well just remember to stay positive and look for the good things in life. Things get better
That phallic sentence made me laugh out loud
That's because you're a child who has never grown up.....
I appreciate gaining these insights into our shared psychology. I see the african has been very important in the development of this knowledge for the consumption of western minds. I also see the efforts Jung makes to distance the african from knowledge already in his possession before his interactions with the West. I See that Jungs, teachers were black.
You see what you WANT to see!
You're completely obsessed (Or should I say POSSESED) by the concept of "Race"
Being black is everything to you. When, in REALITY being Black, White or Asian has basically NOTHING to do with it!
Ahhhhhhh small minded indeed!
The video half way goes back to the same record as the first video part 1-2, little girl dreams
The Soul of Man 28:00
To Sir with love 👍
Was a reference to this in there at some point?
I'm just trying to figure out what my dream meant I had in my childhood..
I woke up at night terrified, the wall next to my bed had words written in fire " I am your one and only God and you shall only serve me" and it ended with an eye opening and looking around my room and closing taking the words with it ..I screamed for my dad and told him everything... I had a religious upbringing so I assume it has something to do with that..but what really bothered me Is that it wasn't in my native language, and I couldn't formulate my own sentences in English back then...but I knew what the words on the wall meant
Anyway as I got older getting involved in online debates I ironically identified myself as atheist.. no watching Dr Peterson videos I can't say I'm atheist but don't believe in an all knowing being as the Christians portray him to be...
Would actually be interesting if someone can give their opinion on it? Is it because of my religious upbringing?
As Carl Jung expresses, the person who can make the most meaning of the symbols is the person who dreamt them himself, however this is my take based on the information given.
First you mention the words written in fire followed by an eye looking around your room and taking the words of fire with it. You mentioned having a religious upbringing, I believe this is the core meaning behind the dream. The eye that observes the room and takes the words might’ve been your unconscious self realization of the effect religion was having on you.
how that relates to you I’m not sure but maybe it has something to do with not feeling spiritually aligned with Christianity?
As for how you understood what the words of fire meant I believe that has to do with the fact that it was a dream and the words did not hold a literal meaning just symbolic meaning. You might not have known how to read or write at the time, but I get the impression you knew how to speak. At this level of understanding, would it be right to assume that you at least knew that words are things that people use to convey things they want to say?
Note: Not a certified psychologist though I’m planning to be, I read Carl Jung and stuff as a hobby. Hope this helps!
Read Quran, Bhagavad Gita, Tibetan Book of the Dead, Tao Te Ching
And Carl Yung. Over and over until you here the words for what they are, not how it hyped up your dream. As salamu alaykum brothers and sisters. Good luck on your straight path 🙏🏻
1:38:00 he spittin
48:35 the role of symbols
Thunder is one of The Great Creator creatures and not voice. He sent them on whom He Wants. He is The Most Powerful.
Thor, ba’al, Zeus, Raijin, all really good guys.(sarcasm)
Yahweh
I wonder what the background voice is about
there's a glitch at 1:07:48 where a section is skipped
48:27 ephemeral attempt
48:30 bookmark
42:38
There is no part 4, you just get part 3 again.
Everything means anything, or nothing at all.
Welcome to today.
A wise man once said NOTHING
The obvious reply. Right back at you. That makes two dummies. Tu e yo... Amigo.
@@jonathanmoore5619
Incorrect.
Only one ARROGANT dummie here. I was merely pointing ☝️ it out.
When you have nothing to say, best say nothing at all.
Farewell 👋
@@RealDealContent-th3do I think your logic is poor. Akin to your misplaced and uncredited use of someone else's works...
@@jonathanmoore5619
🤡 😴 🙄 ~ 👋 ~
Perez Michael Lee Larry Lee Dorothy
Life is an opportunity to walk with G-d and soothe his loneliness.
Story telling
Walker Jeffrey Lee Frank Perez Laura
Yes, I just noticed it loop back if you’re gonna post interesting stuff here maybe do your due diligence… I agree WTF..
anyone experiencing heavy allegorical and not ironic, i'm sure, if not then it be an absolutely miraculous
(hey i spelled that correctly for the first time maybe ever on the first time through,,,woah heart emoji)
and so coincidental that it's not coincidental at ALL
but as the man explains himself in his work, seemingly both,as his published memory put as self 1 and 2) that is to say that his work is of that way that through i assume man and his symbols can speak to man and his symbols from across time through man (current awareness of self) and his symbols (or language as i've been rudimentary/workingly referring to it as)
,, now i'm very new to this miraculous (im told miraculouIS-ness) works , and am only retroactively still awestruck awespiciously as i look-over-edit-tastefully add detail/channel more
and only worked (as over in my mind and in the awareness he speaks of as a patient's dream
about a fourth of his book of memories.etc. (as rilke calls fragments in referance (my affinity for the visiting about france where rilke stayed and dance makes me spell that, THAT WAY) to beloved JP (or IP) Jacobsen..or is it son)
it seems allegorical just in it's 12 dreams and potential of disciple refer-dances in the light of westerns christian tradition, and that of new thought authors as the genre police would call them one of which i reference Neville Goddard's 12 diciplines . among many my conciousness let slip as i let slip my metaphoric and in somewhat physical literal and literary tongue
Moore Edward Clark Betty Lewis Sandra
bummer, dude...
32:10
Stop complaining... better provide a good link?
complaining is the mother of improvement
Then complaining about complaining is the Mother of mothers
@@18bovende which makes it the grandma of complaining...
"Phenomenology and geneology of the Complaint, by UA-cam comment section"
I will just leave this one right here.. :-)
ua-cam.com/video/jsizNY22MhQ/v-deo.html
37:00
50:00