@@MarcusHoover-y6h She's Jewish, it was her idea. Scammers to the end. She was crafty enough to know he went too far and gave him a good bollocking in the dressing room.
I thought I’d seen everything connected to this, then just now happened along this delightful curio from just after they were convicted. Thanks for the upload.
@@tonyshortland8812 Easy lol. The right connections. The public school twit network. The old rolled up trouser leg & dodgy ceremonies etc. Privilege & background don't always necessarily equate with wealth & intelligence
Never seen this before, absolutely brilliant. I do think they're both guilty but I love how there's just a hint of plausible deniability, it makes this entire story so wonderful.
For the million pound question, he says at first-"I think it's a nanomole, but it could be a gigabyte."- then after the cough, he eliminates nanomole and gigabyte and then goes for the one he never heard of???-lol
He did that multiple times too. I think 3 times he clearly stated he was confident with a certain answer, and right after the cough he just goes straight to an answer he never heard of.
@@kylemc0254So he pretended not to have heard of Haussmann/Googol to be entertaining? Might I suggest that a more likely explanation for the Haussmann question is that he saw an obviously German name, thought “I know this!”, and fell into the trap of not checking. You literally see him freeze when Whittock coughs on “Paris”.
@@c2fish1 well uve never seen the real footage its all editted to volume up the coughing.... And yes i think the harder questions he talked em all out to be entertaining they believed boring contestants get a unfairer go
@@kylemc0254The problem is he didn’t contribute any extra knowledge that made me believe he knew the answer. Someone who knew Haussmann did Paris wouldn’t have wasted their time with the obvious “trap” answer. Someone who got to Googol through elimination would explain the process of elimination (like that the other three were SI prefixes). He didn’t do that. The only explanation (other than cheating) is that he feigned ignorance to make the show more exciting. But given how defensive he is about his intelligence (to the point of shouting at the interviewer unprovoked), I don’t buy that either.
I don’t know if you are religious, and it’s perfectly alright if you are not, but I am and one way of interpreting that having happened to him is that it was GOD’s punishment for his sinful behaviour: deception and greed. SMH.
@@nathanpilgrim-howe3238 fair enough. Like you said, it's OK to have differing opinions. My opinion is why would God grant us free will if that means he's granting us the ability to do things he then needs to punish? Doesn't make any sense. I'd love to hear your opinion on that.
This is the worst kind of cheat: he cheats, the whole world sees it, and then he has the nerve to go public and deny everything. And he denies everything with the same calm and coolness with which he cheated. In fact, sometimes he even has got the nerve to show his indignation at the offence he has suffered.
So it obvious that when someone wins the 1million that the recording is seriously heavily scrutinized and listened 🎧 to like a deer 🦌 to look for fraudulent #cheating actions.
24:19 - 😂 they kept the part in where Charles appears to slump down once he believes the cameras have stopped - Diana is quick to stop him and Charles raises an "oops" hand to his face.
They are such fools. If they had just admitted what they did and essentially said "Yeah, it's a fair cop. We tried to play the system and regret doing so now", then most people would have actually supported them and seen them as good folk. It's the fact that they insisted on doubling down and continuing to deny their guilt after the fact which turned the tide of public opinion so thoroughly against them. People will generally root for those who try to cheat a multi-million pound institution such as ITV out of money (it all comes back to rooting for the "underdog"), but people cannot and will not abide a liar.
The tide of public opinion turned against them after the ITV documentary which went out in a prime slot. After that, it went largely out of the public consciousness. They won't 'admit' it because they are innocent.
I don't believe he is guilty. Because, "coughs"? Seriously, their master plan was basing his answers on coughing when anyone else in the audience can cough out of nowhere?
He’s a born liar and should’ve gone to prison for a bit. This is the guy who was later convicted of insurance fraud. Don’t be fooled by the posh accent, he clearly has Harrods taste and a pound shop wallet.
What these people do with their money is beyond me. He had a Majors wage and she was some sort of nursery teacher, plus she previously won 32 grand. Yet somehow they're still skint
I don’t think it would make sense to jail the guy, what would that achieve. But I have to say him hoping we’ll believe that he talked himself out of wrong answers and into right ones is preposterous. I suspect the chances of him being innocent are 1 in a googol
@@kevinbetsy-w9424 more like one in a nanomole 🤣🤣 i do agree about prison being pointless he already lost his career and reputation. Just a shame he made the choices he did. If he had got the hundred pound question wrong and left the show with nothing he'd be a much richer man than he is now.
This is staggering to watch. They seem to know so much about why they aren't guilty, but they have no anger about being wronged. Merely gets angry when he says he isn't stupid.
Im very surprised the host didnt mention one of the most important pieces of evidence - the connection between them and tecwen wittock as it was traced down in the phone calls. Clearly they called each other, based on that alone this entire thing just cant be a coincidence.
+@glutamin111, What's amazing though, is how outside a very small circle of people (who just happen to be friends/family of theirs) nobody believes them. His defence seems to be that he couldn't hear the cough's, but even if you edit out the cough's, the way he answers all the questions is not only unusual and illogical, but it's pure luck.
@@ChrisJohnson-x1x thats a bit harsh i wouldnt say all the questions, he actually had a very good intuition on most of the questions up until the final two questions and the craig david one, clearly he knew some of the answers and had fair reasoning, i agree his style was strange it raised a few redflags immediately but to this day im entirely convinced If he quit at 250.000£ he would get away with it.. last two question he was beyond clueless, it was beyond absurd&bizzare the way he shifted from berlin to paris with no reasoning and then did the same thing with the last question, starting from nanomole then going for the one he never heard of, just because he hasnt heard of it...😂😂 like who the f**k on this planet answers questions like that🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️ and just considering the sheer money weight of the question his audacity made zero sense
@@glutamin111 He explained, albeit in court and not on set, why he changed from Berlin to Paris: "I knew that Paris was a planned city," explains Charles. "The centre of Paris was cleared of slums during the 19th century, and it was rebuilt into districts and boulevards. Prominent in my mind was the economic reason. In the middle of the 19th century France was coming out of the revolutionary period and it was decided, I think by Napoleon III, that he would concentrate on Paris and thereby the remainder of France would flourish."
@@SteRDLK He also explained very clearly on the set that he had no idea who Baron Haussmann was -> 'Haussmann is more of a german name then italian name, athens name or parisian name' No kidding!! My 10 year old nephew knows that and nobody offered him half a million to answer that😂😂 ..seems kind of a cheap giveaway for a question worth that much, no?🤦🏼♂️
Have to say, I do respect the interviewer. You can tell he doesn't buy what they say at all, but he doesn't lash out or anything, just calmly presents the facts and lets them respond, even if they give ridiculous responses.
Interesting transition from a happy go lucky, not particularly clever gameshow contestant "trying his luck" to, a very coherent and intelligent person, once challenged.
I havent seen much of the English version. In the Bulgarian version, the host asks many questions that require explanations and show the participant's knowledge about each answer. So if it is suggested to him, it will be obvious he dont have a clue about the answer.
In the interviews I do see what I interpret as micro expressions of duping delight So unless they regularly have facial expressions like that in day to day life and it’s normal and it applies to them even when they are honest, and people who know them know that and have good experiences with them then they will trust them and won’t be suspicious But of course people who don’t know them will be suspicious as We won’t see it as in the norm for someone honest to regularly show deceptive facial expressions
They couldn't get 10yrs as the cheque was never given authorisation as it was held for 8 days. In which that time they cancelled it and sent the case to police.
@@arianagrandefan934 Maybe they should have given him the cheque then, allowed him to cash it, then within 24 hours, the Police turn up to his house at 2am, pull him out of bed in his underwear, then 6 months later, he gets what he deserves (including his Wife and Tecwen). EDIT: But then again, knowingly giving a cheque to someone you believe cheated, that would come under as entrapment, but he did lose his title of Major, and basically never worked again (and just lived off savings, including having to sell his house), so I suppose Karma took care of him a little bit, also birds of a feather flock together, so I assume he would find it hard to make friends, as who wants to be friends with a convicted fraudster.
How does 10 years benefit society? They had to pay something like 150K US plus go through the trial and lose face, they could have been put in prison too for 12-18 months. But 10 years is not proportionate. They are guilty and they have paid and will continue to emotionally.
Interviewer: "There were witnesses.....one said they heard loud voices and a window slam, another said they heard one of you tell the other to shut up, another said there was a tense atmosphere and another said they also picked up on the tension." Charles: "I don't know why they assume there was an argument."
On the face of it, he brings up some strong arguments, like this notion that a lot of people in the studio were coughing throughout, and he wouldn't have been able to differentiate between who was coughing. But the fact that the coughs happened at the same time he highlighted the right answer, coupled with the fact that Tecwen Whittock also said "No" WITHIN a cough sealed it for me beyond any doubt. Sorry.
Also if you were on the million pound question and you thought the answer was nanomole, why would you go with the other option that you never heard of? It's the same with the A1/Craig David answer, who does that?
The most amazing thing was that Whittock and Ingram got to be on the same show on the same night. The question about why he wanted a million quid despite having a nice comfortable life was stupid. That’s all, I’m off to watch funny dog fails 2024.
It wasn't Trevor MacDonald presenting Tonight that night... it was Martin Bashir. And the Tonight program did not say that Diana was ungrateful. They said she was disappointed.
The guy who was coughing and helping him, got into that hot chair and haven't even won the first 3 questions. How he was able to know the answers for major?
He didn't cough in every question,only the ones he knew, people that goes to those kind of shows prepare themselves for harder questions but no for the easy ones where you can easily fail if they ask something a teen would know but not an adult
In the documentary he also asks the other players in whispers to get 2 of the answers, and the wife coughs for one he doesn’t know. I think he must have also been under extreme psychological pressure after going too far and knowing it then getting on stage. He probably wasn’t together at that point, despite appearances.
Reductive question. The pressure and emotional strain of being up in the chair and the amplified doubts make it exponentially more difficult to feel confident with answers even if you think you know a good portion. Also just because you knew a decent chunk of answers for one game doesn’t mean you will for another game. Also he got help on several answers by asking another contestent, who knows how many times, but at least 2.
If I hadn't cheated and I was being accused of cheating and the money was being threatened I would go crazy. I would flat out deny it and be angry at the mere idea of it. Any innocent person would react the same. His reaction was a dead give away.
The one thing I take from watching this is Charles certainly loves being the centre of attention it's like he had the whole thing scripted from beginning to end I loved the outrange innocence attitude he plays on lol
The thing that struck me was the stupidity of their scheme. All they would have had to have develop a tactic where there were several different alternating signals or reverse signals and they probably wouldn't have gotten caught. A friend of mine was at school with Charles and said that he was an affable chap. Greed can corrupt many a formerly decent person. He is trying to take the public for fools with his lies which would make the neighbor's cat laugh.
I’m not sure if they are lying if you listen with an open mind , I do know that some big businesses in this world defend by destroying or try too destroy the credibility of the defendant.
I can guarantee his IQ is not 149, anybody who brings that up as a defence has at best a slightly above average IQ, as such they fall into the Dunning-Krüger trap of thinking that they are far more superior to the rest of the population. People with an actually high IQ, are aware of how unique they are, and know that it is futile to bring it up. Wouldn't surprise me if he cheated his way into Mensa, especially considering it was easier to do so without the internet being so prevalent to verify things back then.
The interviewer should ask Charles Ingram the same 15 questions
Clever
lol
He'd probably just say the stress of his innocence has caused him amnesia
Hahahahaha
Brilliant
At least he is answering without the aid of cough.
*(cough cough)* Definitely. *(cough cough)*
he should have mixed it up with with a fart and a burp .😊
or "phone a friend"
He’d already taken his Robitussin. I believe he got that sponsorship after the episode!
He should go into politics lying with a straight face like that.
When I saw the game show I thought he was just a buffoon but after seeing this I can tell he's a sophisticated liar and talks like a guilty politician
He's suffering from an illness called "being a pathalogical liar", his wife suffers the same. But he makes his money.
He should just be a politician
@@MarcusHoover-y6h She's Jewish, it was her idea. Scammers to the end. She was crafty enough to know he went too far and gave him a good bollocking in the dressing room.
But he's not thick lol😅
Well said!
When the jury delivered their verdict, the judge asked, 'Is that your final answer?'.
**cough**
Lol
Hahahaha a judge with a dark sarcastic humor
😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂
he's lying through his teeth, dental records must be a disaster at this point :)
Haha 😂 brilliant 😁
He'd make a brilliant politition
He should go into politics lying with a straight face like that.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
I thought I’d seen everything connected to this, then just now happened along this delightful curio from just after they were convicted. Thanks for the upload.
Thanks for uploading this. Ive never seen this before. Most full interviews with ingram seem to be lost
Great interviewer, not afraid to ask them tough questions.
I agree the questions were very good, but the interviewer continuing to interrupt them got to me a little
Well it is called hardtalk?
@@Mandem-s3fExactly
The only surprising thing to me is how he ever got to be a major...
Private 'Parts' would've been more believable
@@tonyshortland8812 Easy lol. The right connections. The public school twit network. The old rolled up trouser leg & dodgy ceremonies etc. Privilege & background don't always necessarily equate with wealth & intelligence
@@tonyshortland8812 Family connections, doors were left gaping open for him to walk through, unsurprisingly didn’t rise from the ranks.
The interviewer in this program was amazing and putting both of them in difficult situations with his questions.
Never seen this before, absolutely brilliant. I do think they're both guilty but I love how there's just a hint of plausible deniability, it makes this entire story so wonderful.
he looks like the sort of person who you would catch stealing a £500 note from the Monolopy bank
And then flips the board when someone confronts him about it
Not at all, i used to steal a lot in board games when i played with my brother, but i would not cheat in real life.
there were 300 coughs during the show... 279 of them were directly after a correct answer...
I’m sure that if you put this guy on a lie detector he would absolutely flat line it. He absolutely believes what he’s saying
It's not a lie if you don't believe it's a lie .
George Costanza.
@@julienfroidevaux1143 well … except that it is. I could believe that I’m Horatio Nelson but it wouldn’t be true
@@Doctor180185 I think he'd make a good politician .
I bet you watch Melrose Place. @@julienfroidevaux1143
The unintentional entertainment value these folks have produced will live on…😂
Almost like talking to a toddler denying that they ate the chocolate when it's all around their face
😂
But toddlers are so cute when they do that.
This fella is an ex Major and supposedly an adult.
For the million pound question, he says at first-"I think it's a nanomole, but it could be a gigabyte."- then after the cough, he eliminates nanomole and gigabyte and then goes for the one he never heard of???-lol
He did that multiple times too. I think 3 times he clearly stated he was confident with a certain answer, and right after the cough he just goes straight to an answer he never heard of.
Youve only seen the editted version remember... And he was trained to be entertaining in changeing answers
@@kylemc0254So he pretended not to have heard of Haussmann/Googol to be entertaining?
Might I suggest that a more likely explanation for the Haussmann question is that he saw an obviously German name, thought “I know this!”, and fell into the trap of not checking. You literally see him freeze when Whittock coughs on “Paris”.
@@c2fish1 well uve never seen the real footage its all editted to volume up the coughing.... And yes i think the harder questions he talked em all out to be entertaining they believed boring contestants get a unfairer go
@@kylemc0254The problem is he didn’t contribute any extra knowledge that made me believe he knew the answer.
Someone who knew Haussmann did Paris wouldn’t have wasted their time with the obvious “trap” answer. Someone who got to Googol through elimination would explain the process of elimination (like that the other three were SI prefixes).
He didn’t do that. The only explanation (other than cheating) is that he feigned ignorance to make the show more exciting. But given how defensive he is about his intelligence (to the point of shouting at the interviewer unprovoked), I don’t buy that either.
"I am not thick" he says. In 2010, Ingram lost three toes on his left foot in an accident involving a lawnmower.
I don’t know if you are religious, and it’s perfectly alright if you are not, but I am and one way of interpreting that having happened to him is that it was GOD’s punishment for his sinful behaviour: deception and greed. SMH.
@@nathanpilgrim-howe3238No,no it wasn’t ! It’s because he is a complete buffoon !!
@@nathanpilgrim-howe3238 fair enough. Like you said, it's OK to have differing opinions. My opinion is why would God grant us free will if that means he's granting us the ability to do things he then needs to punish? Doesn't make any sense. I'd love to hear your opinion on that.
@@huzidamastaDon’t parents want their children to be free but will still punish them if they cross a line?
@jaysant6958 yes because what alternative do WE have?
100% guilty!!!!!!!
The highest number in the world with a % mark at the end! lol
This is the worst kind of cheat: he cheats, the whole world sees it, and then he has the nerve to go public and deny everything. And he denies everything with the same calm and coolness with which he cheated. In fact, sometimes he even has got the nerve to show his indignation at the offence he has suffered.
She went mad as he went to far as the greed took over
That's right. You could see it in her face.
In a documentary, the show’s producers said they would’ve probably not taken action if he had walked at the £125000 question.
@@colinmale3331 I believe that. He should have stopped there. $125,000 quid isn't bad!
@@ForeverBennett Especially in 2001. It can buy you quite lot of things
So it obvious that when someone wins the 1million that the recording is seriously heavily scrutinized and listened 🎧 to like a deer 🦌 to look for fraudulent #cheating actions.
".. I'm not thick .. I'm a member of MENSA..!!" 🤣🤣
He is?
@@kylemc0254 If he's a member of MENSA he must've bribed his way in! 🤣
@@mcvicarross7 there was someone coughing in the background during the iq tests 😂
@@Mark-lj1dj 🤣 he was as thick as shit! 😆👍
😜
The gift that keeps giving these two
24:19 - 😂 they kept the part in where Charles appears to slump down once he believes the cameras have stopped - Diana is quick to stop him and Charles raises an "oops" hand to his face.
He's such a buffoon!
you're point?
@@warrenwild3351 I'm what?
Well spotted 😂
This guy should be a politician they talk a load of bullshit
They are such fools. If they had just admitted what they did and essentially said "Yeah, it's a fair cop. We tried to play the system and regret doing so now", then most people would have actually supported them and seen them as good folk. It's the fact that they insisted on doubling down and continuing to deny their guilt after the fact which turned the tide of public opinion so thoroughly against them. People will generally root for those who try to cheat a multi-million pound institution such as ITV out of money (it all comes back to rooting for the "underdog"), but people cannot and will not abide a liar.
The tide of public opinion turned against them after the ITV documentary which went out in a prime slot. After that, it went largely out of the public consciousness. They won't 'admit' it because they are innocent.
I don't believe he is guilty.
Because, "coughs"? Seriously, their master plan was basing his answers on coughing when anyone else in the audience can cough out of nowhere?
He'd make an amazing car sales person! Diana could be the front office receptionist!
Why is that so true 😂
Legend has it that the crew who really wanted to cough held back their cough until this interview was over.
He’s a born liar and should’ve gone to prison for a bit. This is the guy who was later convicted of insurance fraud. Don’t be fooled by the posh accent, he clearly has Harrods taste and a pound shop wallet.
What these people do with their money is beyond me. He had a Majors wage and she was some sort of nursery teacher, plus she previously won 32 grand. Yet somehow they're still skint
That Harrods comment seems more jarring now...
I don’t think it would make sense to jail the guy, what would that achieve. But I have to say him hoping we’ll believe that he talked himself out of wrong answers and into right ones is preposterous. I suspect the chances of him being innocent are 1 in a googol
@@kevinbetsy-w9424 😃. You’re probably right about prison for him, but it was a 1 million pound fraud.
@@kevinbetsy-w9424 more like one in a nanomole 🤣🤣 i do agree about prison being pointless he already lost his career and reputation. Just a shame he made the choices he did. If he had got the hundred pound question wrong and left the show with nothing he'd be a much richer man than he is now.
This is staggering to watch. They seem to know so much about why they aren't guilty, but they have no anger about being wronged. Merely gets angry when he says he isn't stupid.
Honest Charles and Diane , unbelievable.
'These two people are a classic example of 'if you mumble a lie one million times it will become the truth someday'
It will not !!!!
Thanks for posting, never seen this before
squalid people. Especially the wife. It's incredible that after seeing herself in the recordings she had the nerve to declare herself Innocent.
Yeah she gave it away entirely..her expressions and reactions were completely transparent…
This is a really interesting interview. His demeanor is completely different here, it's almost difficult to believe it's the same person.
Im very surprised the host didnt mention one of the most important pieces of evidence - the connection between them and tecwen wittock as it was traced down in the phone calls. Clearly they called each other, based on that alone this entire thing just cant be a coincidence.
+@glutamin111,
What's amazing though, is how outside a very small circle of people (who just happen to be friends/family of theirs) nobody believes them.
His defence seems to be that he couldn't hear the cough's, but even if you edit out the cough's, the way he answers all the questions is not only unusual and illogical, but it's pure luck.
@@ChrisJohnson-x1x thats a bit harsh i wouldnt say all the questions, he actually had a very good intuition on most of the questions up until the final two questions and the craig david one, clearly he knew some of the answers and had fair reasoning, i agree his style was strange it raised a few redflags immediately but to this day im entirely convinced If he quit at 250.000£ he would get away with it..
last two question he was beyond clueless, it was beyond absurd&bizzare the way he shifted from berlin to paris with no reasoning and then did the same thing with the last question, starting from nanomole then going for the one he never heard of, just because he hasnt heard of it...😂😂 like who the f**k on this planet answers questions like that🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️ and just considering the sheer money weight of the question his audacity made zero sense
@@glutamin111 He explained, albeit in court and not on set, why he changed from Berlin to Paris: "I knew that Paris was a planned city," explains Charles. "The centre of Paris was cleared of slums during the 19th century, and it was rebuilt into districts and boulevards. Prominent in my mind was the economic reason. In the middle of the 19th century France was coming out of the revolutionary period and it was decided, I think by Napoleon III, that he would concentrate on Paris and thereby the remainder of France would flourish."
@@SteRDLK He also explained very clearly on the set that he had no idea who Baron Haussmann was -> 'Haussmann is more of a german name then italian name, athens name or parisian name'
No kidding!! My 10 year old nephew knows that and nobody offered him half a million to answer that😂😂 ..seems kind of a cheap giveaway for a question worth that much, no?🤦🏼♂️
@@glutamin111 Haussmann is a German name so he wasn't wrong
"I'm not thick!" (Angry expression) - you are thick 🤣
Interviewer- What's your name?
Charles - Major Charles Ingram.
Diana-(Cough)
LOL
The interviewer hit the nail on the head with “it sounded like a call that you had been anticipating” 👌👌👌
He never gives up! A total knob!
For all his faults you can actually understand how he still made it so far in the army with the never say die mentality he’s got though
@markjagger2412 No mate. Sorry. I can't! 😉
GUILTY. 100%
If i was the interviewer. I wouldnt be able this stop laughing 😂😂😂
You don’t have to be a member of Mensa to operate a lawnmower
How can you deny?!
Are they for real?!
Damn narcissists 😡
And he’s talking about his IQ 😂😂😂 but didn’t hear about coldplay 😂
@@zarkodzabic5627you think knowing pop music makes you smart or something? 😂
@@jakedasilva6847 look man, i am from serbia and i know them, and i do not even listen that type of music, so it’s a little bit strange
@@zarkodzabic5627
*Correction:* _Craig David._
They low life
I was waiting for one of them to cough when the presenter asked them 'did you cheat' 🙊
Have to say, I do respect the interviewer. You can tell he doesn't buy what they say at all, but he doesn't lash out or anything, just calmly presents the facts and lets them respond, even if they give ridiculous responses.
Interesting transition from a happy go lucky, not particularly clever gameshow contestant "trying his luck" to, a very coherent and intelligent person, once challenged.
( 18:03 ) this moment! 😱
@@CJFS00s right, this man knows exactly what he did. Calculated, very smart guy.
He's got the stare of a psychopath. 😮😂
feels like ive gone back to 2007 with 360p videos
Simple Solution:
Have Charles on Millionaire again 1 on 1 without an audience and see how far he goes.
I havent seen much of the English version. In the Bulgarian version, the host asks many questions that require explanations and show the participant's knowledge about each answer. So if it is suggested to him, it will be obvious he dont have a clue about the answer.
In the interviews I do see what I interpret as micro expressions of duping delight
So unless they regularly have facial expressions like that in day to day life and it’s normal and it applies to them even when they are honest, and people who know them know that and have good experiences with them then they will trust them and won’t be suspicious
But of course people who don’t know them will be suspicious as We won’t see it as in the norm for someone honest to regularly show deceptive facial expressions
should have got 10 years for that kind of money fraud
They couldn't get 10yrs as the cheque was never given authorisation as it was held for 8 days. In which that time they cancelled it and sent the case to police.
@@arianagrandefan934
Maybe they should have given him the cheque then, allowed him to cash it, then within 24 hours, the Police turn up to his house at 2am, pull him out of bed in his underwear, then 6 months later, he gets what he deserves (including his Wife and Tecwen).
EDIT: But then again, knowingly giving a cheque to someone you believe cheated, that would come under as entrapment, but he did lose his title of Major, and basically never worked again (and just lived off savings, including having to sell his house), so I suppose Karma took care of him a little bit, also birds of a feather flock together, so I assume he would find it hard to make friends, as who wants to be friends with a convicted fraudster.
How does 10 years benefit society? They had to pay something like 150K US plus go through the trial and lose face, they could have been put in prison too for 12-18 months. But 10 years is not proportionate. They are guilty and they have paid and will continue to emotionally.
Wow I actually almost believed him watching this!!
I’d have more respect if they’d fess up ! Tried it, messed it up and screwed up….
Did anyone cough in this interview? 😂
Interviewer: "There were witnesses.....one said they heard loud voices and a window slam, another said they heard one of you tell the other to shut up, another said there was a tense atmosphere and another said they also picked up on the tension."
Charles: "I don't know why they assume there was an argument."
On the face of it, he brings up some strong arguments, like this notion that a lot of people in the studio were coughing throughout, and he wouldn't have been able to differentiate between who was coughing. But the fact that the coughs happened at the same time he highlighted the right answer, coupled with the fact that Tecwen Whittock also said "No" WITHIN a cough sealed it for me beyond any doubt. Sorry.
Also if you were on the million pound question and you thought the answer was nanomole, why would you go with the other option that you never heard of? It's the same with the A1/Craig David answer, who does that?
Wow! I didn't expect such silky smooth lying. Is he prime minister yet?
Truly amazing they still denied this
Greedy people
Evil people 😡
Corrrr he’s done this a few times in the mirror 🤣🤦🏼♂️
It definitely sounds rehearst
She kept looking at Tatwin every time the answers came up. They are liars. I bet they would not take a lie test.
Thanks for uploading this. 😊
Unbelievable how they actually pulled this off on national television live..I think Ingram and Boris would get on like a house of fire 😅
Her eyes lit up when the fastest finger machine got mentioned.
The anchor should ask Diana why she was constantly looking towards the "cougher"
Why were they all given suspended sentences & not sent to jail? At least ‘MAJOR’ lost his toes afterwards so ‘what goes around, comes around’ ❤
lol it's pretty funny watching Charles blatantly lying here. Anyone who has watched the infamous episode will know there was cheating
He was told to resign his Queen Commission and kept his pension rights. He lost his shit at 4.50 enough said.
I only knew the 1 million question myself because of Back to the Future 3, when Doc says "once in a googleplex" instead of once in a million.
The most amazing thing was that Whittock and Ingram got to be on the same show on the same night. The question about why he wanted a million quid despite having a nice comfortable life was stupid. That’s all, I’m off to watch funny dog fails 2024.
To be fair they both put up a good defence in this programme, although they are clearly guilty as hell
It wasn't Trevor MacDonald presenting Tonight that night... it was Martin Bashir.
And the Tonight program did not say that Diana was ungrateful. They said she was disappointed.
He’s defending himself here yet he didn’t when he got called and told he wasn’t getting his million.
They will go down in history that's for sure.
He'll never admit even to this day. I've seen the show, it's too obvious that he cheated.
The guy’s a total liar. He can’t even tell the truth here. Should have gone to prison.
The guy who was coughing and helping him, got into that hot chair and haven't even won the first 3 questions. How he was able to know the answers for major?
He didn't cough in every question,only the ones he knew, people that goes to those kind of shows prepare themselves for harder questions but no for the easy ones where you can easily fail if they ask something a teen would know but not an adult
In the documentary he also asks the other players in whispers to get 2 of the answers, and the wife coughs for one he doesn’t know. I think he must have also been under extreme psychological pressure after going too far and knowing it then getting on stage. He probably wasn’t together at that point, despite appearances.
what a stupid question? a genius man can miss a simple question... so there are random questions in a field that a child may know and u dont.
He has a iq of 150 but lies like a iq of 10
Reductive question. The pressure and emotional strain of being up in the chair and the amplified doubts make it exponentially more difficult to feel confident with answers even if you think you know a good portion. Also just because you knew a decent chunk of answers for one game doesn’t mean you will for another game. Also he got help on several answers by asking another contestent, who knows how many times, but at least 2.
Their innocence is SOOOOO clear
This is hard to watch. Can’t help thinking Jon Sopiel wouldn’t be be this harsh with any political
If I hadn't cheated and I was being accused of cheating and the money was being threatened I would go crazy. I would flat out deny it and be angry at the mere idea of it. Any innocent person would react the same. His reaction was a dead give away.
Why does the interviewer cannot wait for them to finish answering....while he wants them to listen and not interrupt..
The cough is gone, too. wt😅😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂👌
The one thing I take from watching this is Charles certainly loves being the centre of attention it's like he had the whole thing scripted from beginning to end I loved the outrange innocence attitude he plays on lol
Did you see him on a morning tv show talking about past life progression? I was a bit confused by why the program got him involved
Interesting interview
Ive never seen brazen lying at this level since. These are the biggest liars ever in the public eye.
Now chief adviser to Prince Andrew.
the lies are so extreme
The thing that struck me was the stupidity of their scheme. All they would have had to have develop a tactic where there were several different alternating signals or reverse signals and they probably wouldn't have gotten caught. A friend of mine was at school with Charles and said that he was an affable chap. Greed can corrupt many a formerly decent person. He is trying to take the public for fools with his lies which would make the neighbor's cat laugh.
18:02 Yeah, you are. VERY much so 😂
18:14 "I'm not thick", Charles Ingram said, with the dumbest stare ever seen on TV
What does "thick" mean?
@@durgaharidas5204fat brain.
Look at his eyes a constant liar.
Yooh I can't believe this 😮😮😮
After the trial he had to cough up all that money back! "Cough up"? Get it? 😂
I’m not sure if they are lying if you listen with an open mind , I do know that some big businesses in this world defend by destroying or try too destroy the credibility of the defendant.
I saw them both running a market stall on guildford high street a few years ago.
What were they selling, please?
@@kp9952 Cough medicine
@@kp9952 cough sweets
@@rizwaankhan8403🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
They were guilty as sin.
They are both hopelessly in denial.
They would regain some respect if they just said look we made a mistake, got caught and we are sorry
I can guarantee his IQ is not 149, anybody who brings that up as a defence has at best a slightly above average IQ, as such they fall into the Dunning-Krüger trap of thinking that they are far more superior to the rest of the population. People with an actually high IQ, are aware of how unique they are, and know that it is futile to bring it up.
Wouldn't surprise me if he cheated his way into Mensa, especially considering it was easier to do so without the internet being so prevalent to verify things back then.