Catherine Eddowes should have at least a blue plaque in wolverhampton. She was a Black Country Lass. She came from Wolverhampton, and her family lived in 50 Bilston Road and when she lived in wolves she worked in the japanning trade. She was the poor victim along with Elizabeth stride of the 'double event'. Because they reckon that the killer was probably interrupted on Liz, he took all his angst out on poor Catherine to the point where he even attacked her face too. These women were victims of society, alcohol, hard not easy living, and no real assistance and services that we are lucky to have now. God rest their souls.
These woman actually changed the course of history. 1 million newspapers a day were being printed and the rest of the world was noticing the conditions the working class were subjected to and began to do diverging about it
The dress that woman drew was not the sort of dress that a woman who was sleeping rough would have worn. They wore thick tights with darns and holes in, everything they owned was worn one item on top of the other. Clothing didn’t fit properly. Seriously if the woman doing the drawing thinks that looks like a working lady of the night or anything similar then she is mistaken. She has drawn a lady of higher class which is exactly what people think everyone would have looked like then. Life wasn’t a Quality Street tin I’m afraid. No psychic powers in either of them. Also they weren’t all prostitutes.
None of it bears any resemblance to known facts. The bodies were not moved by horse drawn hearses for a start. Total fantasy. And presumably they are getting paid for it.
A well dressed middle class gentleman would not be safe walking around Spitalfields and Whitechapel which was notorious for it's street robberies and violent crime (can you imagine a middle class, well dressed gentleman walking around the worst and most dangerous areas of modern day British cities at 11pm or 3am? He'd be noticed and followed by the local thug's and then robbed and beaten up and maybe even stabbed). Not just that, but the huge number of prostitutes in London at the time was divided into different classes and levels, from young and pretty girls right down to the homeless, starving, infected with STD and maybe with skin problems, rotten teeth, parasites like nits and lice. A prosperous man would be unlikely to be attracted to such women so it's a lot more likely that the killer was able to fit in the slums and was street wise and unlikely to be seen as a potential robbery victim, which says to me that he was probably a local man who didn't stand out in a slum district late at night.
I watched about three minutes and the total disrespect to the victim was appalling maybe the 'medium' should remember that they have descendants. Oral hygiene wasn't as important as shelter and food.
She's insulting and tracking off her trolley,hee is no way I would of stood in the pissing rain listening to some lunatic telling me she saw him wearing a black coat or something
I had to watch this all the way through because it actually annoyed me to the point I found myself talking to the tv saying how ridiculously scripted and factually incorrect. If that guy was a blue badge tour guide he should hand it back!
that's Assuming they knew the name of the murderer...he was a random guy picking them up for sex (they thought) and I think they were DEAD before they knew what happened
It's highly unlikely that Jack the Ripper was this well dressed aristocrat heading into the East End as he would've stuck out. And tall? So around undernourished/malnourished short people is this well fed, tall aristocrat and nobody around there notices him?
Me too. "Top Hat"? In the eastend? He'd stick out like a sore thumb. To find his way round that rabbit warren he'd have to know the area well and not stand out so evening gear, top hats and anything posh would stand out
Exactly!. I'm assuming that Lorraine is basting her information off of popular Jack the ripper images rather than actually coming up with more tangible description of the ripper.
@@alexanderosborne1288 It is laughable. There is enough Genuine Ripper information here that you would think they would have at least got their facts straight. This is just a load of melodramatic tosh made up to entertain the gullible.
@@kithale316 if she'd read up on it even more than what she had she'd have found out Annie Chapman was seen with a man at the entrance to the back yard in a deerstalker hat
I agree I m distantly related to James Robert Less who was the medium at the time trying to predict who jack the ripper was and he did nt get close either. No one is mentioned by name as being the killer by this Lorraine
Exactly, the only good thing to come out of it is that she's exposed herself as a fraud. She couldn't even be bothered to separate the actual real story with the myths that surrounds the case. To think of all the people she's conned out of money with her fakery. Thankfully she's really stupid. The witnesses who saw the victims moments before their deaths described a man who was shabbily dressed but respectable with a cloth cap with a peak. How she can walk about lying like that is so annoying, he didn't wear a top hat and he wasn't tall or posh and educated. He was a local scruff. Bringing up carriages out of made up films like from hell or the Michael caine series, it's absolutely ridiculous, what a phoney!!
> If you are going to scam people like this, it helps to do research. It is not as though there is any lack of information on the Ripper victims and suspects! Utter twaddle. They are not even in the right places!
I'm sorry but this 'medium' is talking absolute rubbish. If she's so good why can't she say who the killer was. I also feel like this all an act. She must know about Jack the Ripper. It's a very well known and well documented. This is very disappointing.
And the stuff she chose to mention is all the fake stuff that didn't happen. She couldn't even be bothered to look into the case and got her stuff from movies like from hell or the Michael caine two parter.
She mentions the names Robert and Charles.. the 2 Cartmen who found Mary Anne Nichols were called those names and had a horse and cart.one worked with meat
I have the full clothing and possessions on their person list of each of the canonical five victims. They dressed in every item they owned one on top of the other. No pretty dresses, thick tights with holes and darned feet, thick skirts, mens vests, no money on any of them, one had two tiny tins containing a small amount of tea and sugar, one had a clay pipe.
ha ha they are trying to act like the two in dead files the medium and the ex police officer she is just telling the story everyone knows if she was a medium she would know who it was it is all just for show
The Ripper didn't kill any of his victims with a knife, except those he already thought were dead but may have simply passed out. The Ripper strangled his victims to death and then cut them. That's why he was so different from all other murders at the time. Ferocious murder to send a message was common among the prostitutes and people of White Chapple at the time. Cutting in order to kill. (Only cutting after death to hide a body. Sending a message with horrible violence necessitated display.) The Ripper was the first who killed in order to cut. He did not hide his victims, which was the onlly reason ever come across at that point to cut AFTER death.
This is true what I am about to say. When I first started watching this video I kept getting what I thought was the word 'druid' in my head. I couldn't think why. I thought nothing of it until about 10 mins later the ex policeman mentions this man called 'Druitt'. It gave me goosepumps. I had never heard of this mans name before at all. Spooky.
Sorry, but I gotta say this. Everything about Martha Tabram's murder was identical to the canonical 5 except she was stabbed in the throat and abdomen instead of slashed. Stabbing throws off much more blood than slashing does, so it would make sense that the killer would alter his MO. Each subsequent murder was altered in some way as well. No two murders were exactly alike. Martha Tabram was a prostitute, the time of the month fits the other murders. The time of night fits the other murders. She was choked while standing up, laid down when unconscious, and her throat and abdomen were attacked. Victimology was exactly the same. Her murder location was nearly the exact center of the geographical profile. If the purpose for killing Tabram was just to kill her then why stab her 39 times? The stabs to the throat would have killed her. Why all the overkill. If the ripper did not kill Tabram then there was another brutal killer in whitechapel who choked his victim out, laid her down and then performed brutal overkill on her body. Only he never killed again? I can't prove Tabram was a Ripper victim, and I DON'T want to convince anyone that she WAS a ripper victim. We don't know. I'm just explaining why I believe she was actually a ripper victim. Its just my personal opinion
Her accent seemed to switch between stereotypical 19th century cocker-ney and almost brummie too🤔and the reference to polly nichols' rotten teeth/missing teeth although i'm sure not mean't in a disrespectful fashion was certainly disrespectful and crass,polly most likely had to turn to prostitution in order to bloody stay alive!
Anyone who's read a book can come up with what she's saying,this crest is like the Micheal Cane film too. The man hasn't read up on it to well as the last supposed victim was 25 not 27 and there was no tenement blocks in Millers court or Dorset street
In all honesty I've got this on but not really taking to much notice of her awful voice but from what I'm gathering she's claiming to be getting information directly from the victims now one comment I've read said she mentioned Paul and Cross presuming she's making reference or claiming one or either may of been responsible for at least the Nichols murder but let's just for the time being say she's right well for a dead woman to be able to actually name her killer and then pass on that information through a medium she'd of had to of known her killer previously because if not how what a dead woman be able to know the names of those responsible if dead !
Who done it? A new way to earn money around that most popular question. Tastless? Without any doubt! Nevertheless, when I will meet my maker, this might be one of the questions i'd like to ask.
I used to think it was Francis tumblers.he was a quack doctor,who hated women...he had organs in jars,and fled to America on a ship after the last murder.he was homosexual,in the area at the time of the murders..and one of the rippers letter was signed dear boss,an American term
The thing is jack the ripper is not connected by a hospital i asked a medium who did not know much about jack the ripper claims he was a butcher which means he could hide in plain site and some suspected a butcher but i cant remember a name.
the first of the canonical murders was in Bucks Row Polly Anne Nichols went there with her Killer from the Whitechapel Road just round the back of the Tube Station at the front of the station opposite is London Hospital where the Elephant Man was currently residing , some say the killer came from the Hospital ref "Ripper Confidential " Tom Westcott
@@stephenwhite3967 i am convinced the killer killed before and after the canonical 5 Martha Tabram is a dead cert if you pardon the expression ,he was definitely disturbed on the murder of Nichols this i the best documentary so far ua-cam.com/video/UIyAMo-fms0/v-deo.html Charles Lechmere is my no1 suspect no2 Carl Feigenbaum a merchant seaman (Whitechapel 12min walk from the docks ) who ended up in New York comiting two similar crimes before being sent to the chair ole sparky .My most ridiculous suspects 1) Royal conspiracy and all that goes with it 2) Walter Sickert
Well you've got the timing wrong of how long it took to murder Catherine Eddows. You've timed it from when the witnesses saw her to the time the policeman found her which are two different places, meaning it took much less than 12 minutes to commit the murder and mutilation.
Strangely even before I watched this video I suspected for a while that the killer had some sort Surgeon type background like a doctor, and when I heard Lorraine mention the surgeon background a few times again I got goosebumps. Well done Lorraine, you have been spiritually gifted. I’ve been studying case for a while and by looking at the obvious similarities of the wounds on all his victims it was obvious that only a top medical surgeon could surgically cut and remove certain body parts. And the motive could be as Lorraine said to further be in the top in the medical profession. I wouldn’t be surprised if more physics like her will she’d more on the medical/surgeon background in the future investigations. Well done Lorraine. 😊👍
I guess the Johnny Depp movie, From Hell, was more on the nose than we knew 😏 support interesting though. There was a *Sir Robert Alexander Chermside* on Queen Victoria medical staff, tho not her personal doctor. That was sir james reid. Robert Alexander doesn't fit with all she is saying tho. He died a grandfather.
You actually believe that woman was in contact with Jack the Ripper? Can I sell you some beachfront property in Nebraska? It's going cheap, but keep in mind it is beachfront!
Catherine Eddowes should have at least a blue plaque in wolverhampton. She was a Black Country Lass. She came from Wolverhampton, and her family lived in 50 Bilston Road and when she lived in wolves she worked in the japanning trade. She was the poor victim along with Elizabeth stride of the 'double event'. Because they reckon that the killer was probably interrupted on Liz, he took all his angst out on poor Catherine to the point where he even attacked her face too. These women were victims of society, alcohol, hard not easy living, and no real assistance and services that we are lucky to have now. God rest their souls.
These woman actually changed the course of history. 1 million newspapers a day were being printed and the rest of the world was noticing the conditions the working class were subjected to and began to do diverging about it
The dress that woman drew was not the sort of dress that a woman who was sleeping rough would have worn. They wore thick tights with darns and holes in, everything they owned was worn one item on top of the other. Clothing didn’t fit properly. Seriously if the woman doing the drawing thinks that looks like a working lady of the night or anything similar then she is mistaken. She has drawn a lady of higher class which is exactly what people think everyone would have looked like then. Life wasn’t a Quality Street tin I’m afraid. No psychic powers in either of them. Also they weren’t all prostitutes.
Looks like she liked copying sketches from recent Vogue magazines....
None of it bears any resemblance to known facts. The bodies were not moved by horse drawn hearses for a start. Total fantasy. And presumably they are getting paid for it.
Exactly. Just what I was thinking. I gave up after that.
All this information is readily available with the smallest of research🤦♂️ .
Yea... just one word needed here to describe it....BOLLOCKS
A well dressed middle class gentleman would not be safe walking around Spitalfields and Whitechapel which was notorious for it's street robberies and violent crime (can you imagine a middle class, well dressed gentleman walking around the worst and most dangerous areas of modern day British cities at 11pm or 3am? He'd be noticed and followed by the local thug's and then robbed and beaten up and maybe even stabbed).
Not just that, but the huge number of prostitutes in London at the time was divided into different classes and levels, from young and pretty girls right down to the homeless, starving, infected with STD and maybe with skin problems, rotten teeth, parasites like nits and lice.
A prosperous man would be unlikely to be attracted to such women so it's a lot more likely that the killer was able to fit in the slums and was street wise and unlikely to be seen as a potential robbery victim, which says to me that he was probably a local man who didn't stand out in a slum district late at night.
Her voice id leave the group quick as hell, she's obviously read up on it
Actually she hasn't! Nothing she says is accurate! It is so bad it is laughable
I watched about three minutes and the total disrespect to the victim was appalling maybe the 'medium' should remember that they have descendants. Oral hygiene wasn't as important as shelter and food.
And “lucky her”? I doubt she was having fun.
I thought that that was someone's daughter .. maybe sister .. but however some ones family 🙏🙌 rip
👏👏👏👏👏
She's insulting and tracking off her trolley,hee is no way I would of stood in the pissing rain listening to some lunatic telling me she saw him wearing a black coat or something
Her VOICE Is UNGODLY, As Well!!
I had to watch this all the way through because it actually annoyed me to the point I found myself talking to the tv saying how ridiculously scripted and factually incorrect. If that guy was a blue badge tour guide he should hand it back!
She only focuses on the written parts that have been popular theories for over 130yrs
If the victims actually talked to her wouldn't one think the name of the murderer would be the 1st thing they would reveal?
that's Assuming they knew the name of the murderer...he was a random guy picking them up for sex (they thought) and I think they were DEAD before they knew what happened
Medium my arse 🤣
More like a large
Hahaha; More like grand farce;
It's highly unlikely that Jack the Ripper was this well dressed aristocrat heading into the East End as he would've stuck out. And tall? So around undernourished/malnourished short people is this well fed, tall aristocrat and nobody around there notices him?
I'm extremely sceptical about the information Loraine gave.
Me too. "Top Hat"? In the eastend? He'd stick out like a sore thumb. To find his way round that rabbit warren he'd have to know the area well and not stand out so evening gear, top hats and anything posh would stand out
Adding top hat could be policeman's helmet
Exactly!.
I'm assuming that Lorraine is basting her information off of popular Jack the ripper images rather than actually coming up with more tangible description of the ripper.
@@alexanderosborne1288 It is laughable. There is enough Genuine Ripper information here that you would think they would have at least got their facts straight. This is just a load of melodramatic tosh made up to entertain the gullible.
@@kithale316 if she'd read up on it even more than what she had she'd have found out Annie Chapman was seen with a man at the entrance to the back yard in a deerstalker hat
Alot of this is common knowledge
Exactly what i said!!
What a dreadful medium.
If anyone talked posh In the in East End people WOULD HAVE NOTICED.
What absolute crap; this does not follow any factual evidence and literally is built on myth. This is such an injustice to the poor victims
I agree I m distantly related to James Robert Less who was the medium at the time trying to predict who jack the ripper was and he did nt get close either. No one is mentioned by name as being the killer by this Lorraine
Exactly, the only good thing to come out of it is that she's exposed herself as a fraud. She couldn't even be bothered to separate the actual real story with the myths that surrounds the case. To think of all the people she's conned out of money with her fakery. Thankfully she's really stupid. The witnesses who saw the victims moments before their deaths described a man who was shabbily dressed but respectable with a cloth cap with a peak. How she can walk about lying like that is so annoying, he didn't wear a top hat and he wasn't tall or posh and educated. He was a local scruff. Bringing up carriages out of made up films like from hell or the Michael caine series, it's absolutely ridiculous, what a phoney!!
> If you are going to scam people like this, it helps to do research. It is not as though there is any lack of information on the Ripper victims and suspects! Utter twaddle. They are not even in the right places!
“Utter Twaddle”
You are why I’m here….for the comments! So funny
I'm sorry but this 'medium' is talking absolute rubbish. If she's so good why can't she say who the killer was.
I also feel like this all an act.
She must know about Jack the Ripper. It's a very well known and well documented. This is very disappointing.
And the stuff she chose to mention is all the fake stuff that didn't happen. She couldn't even be bothered to look into the case and got her stuff from movies like from hell or the Michael caine two parter.
She mentions the names Robert and Charles.. the 2 Cartmen who found Mary Anne Nichols were called those names and had a horse and cart.one worked with meat
The psychic is BS.
I'm very sceptical
I have the full clothing and possessions on their person list of each of the canonical five victims. They dressed in every item they owned one on top of the other. No pretty dresses, thick tights with holes and darned feet, thick skirts, mens vests, no money on any of them, one had two tiny tins containing a small amount of tea and sugar, one had a clay pipe.
HOW COME YOU HAVE THEM?
This so called medium should be able to pick up on who Jack the ripper was. Why hasn't she?
"It's almost like"... Is it? 🤣
The orbs show were rain drops .
Lol
Not convinced , you can read everything about this subject and say all this .
Top hat??? Oh..what a surprise. ....that news....no one ever described him wearing one of those...
Everyone had rotten teeth victorian days 🤣🤣
Slightly amusing here and there, but utter nonsense of course !.
She was doing so well until she started in about the Royal family. That when I knew she was talking utter crap
wasnt mary kelly 25
What about long liz or Elizabeth stride as her real name was. She was never mentioned
I don't like this medium , is absolutely awful
ha ha they are trying to act like the two in dead files the medium and the ex police officer she is just telling the story everyone knows if she was a medium she would know who it was it is all just for show
Mmmm sceptical
She is my Besties Grandma
Tell her she’s a crap actress.
I think i know more about the ripper than these....(inside job) no other way....I walked the area!!!
What a load of crap
The Ripper didn't kill any of his victims with a knife, except those he already thought were dead but may have simply passed out. The Ripper strangled his victims to death and then cut them. That's why he was so different from all other murders at the time. Ferocious murder to send a message was common among the prostitutes and people of White Chapple at the time. Cutting in order to kill. (Only cutting after death to hide a body. Sending a message with horrible violence necessitated display.) The Ripper was the first who killed in order to cut. He did not hide his victims, which was the onlly reason ever come across at that point to cut AFTER death.
How can these victims souls rest knowing their butcherer was never caught
Orbs all around her, but you are taking flash pictures when it's raining/drizzling/misting outside . . . 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Druitt was innocent
Yeah, Montague Druitt was definitely not Jack the Ripper.
What a badly acted and rehearsed play. And people believe it?
The worst scripted "Psychic" i have seen in a while!
She is my besties Grandma
@@aprilnewton_x And?
@@aprilnewton_x She's a fraud, unless she can tell us what next weeks lottery numbers are, and she has the most annoying voice I've heard.
@@aprilnewton_x So you keep repeating, so what.
And she’s rubbish.
Like what the medium woman doesn't know nothing at all she's a joke or what
Hahahahahahaha 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Very interesting, loved it!
I read that one of victims got into fight with another prostitute and had some of her teeth punched out.
The spooky music was probably the only decent thing lol
This is true what I am about to say. When I first started watching this video I kept getting what I thought was the word 'druid' in my head. I couldn't think why. I thought nothing of it until about 10 mins later the ex policeman mentions this man called 'Druitt'. It gave me goosepumps. I had never heard of this mans name before at all. Spooky.
Anyone can do her job.Just read a bit about it and we can all do a show like this
Sorry, but I gotta say this. Everything about Martha Tabram's murder was identical to the canonical 5 except she was stabbed in the throat and abdomen instead of slashed. Stabbing throws off much more blood than slashing does, so it would make sense that the killer would alter his MO. Each subsequent murder was altered in some way as well. No two murders were exactly alike.
Martha Tabram was a prostitute, the time of the month fits the other murders. The time of night fits the other murders. She was choked while standing up, laid down when unconscious, and her throat and abdomen were attacked. Victimology was exactly the same. Her murder location was nearly the exact center of the geographical profile. If the purpose for killing Tabram was just to kill her then why stab her 39 times? The stabs to the throat would have killed her. Why all the overkill. If the ripper did not kill Tabram then there was another brutal killer in whitechapel who choked his victim out, laid her down and then performed brutal overkill on her body. Only he never killed again?
I can't prove Tabram was a Ripper victim, and I DON'T want to convince anyone that she WAS a ripper victim. We don't know. I'm just explaining why I believe she was actually a ripper victim. Its just my personal opinion
Her accent seemed to switch between stereotypical 19th century cocker-ney and almost brummie too🤔and the reference to polly nichols' rotten teeth/missing teeth although i'm sure not mean't in a disrespectful fashion was certainly disrespectful and crass,polly most likely had to turn to prostitution in order to bloody stay alive!
Anyone who's read a book can come up with what she's saying,this crest is like the Micheal Cane film too.
The man hasn't read up on it to well as the last supposed victim was 25 not 27 and there was no tenement blocks in Millers court or Dorset street
Pure crap
In all honesty I've got this on but not really taking to much notice of her awful voice but from what I'm gathering she's claiming to be getting information directly from the victims now one comment I've read said she mentioned Paul and Cross presuming she's making reference or claiming one or either may of been responsible for at least the Nichols murder but let's just for the time being say she's right well for a dead woman to be able to actually name her killer and then pass on that information through a medium she'd of had to of known her killer previously because if not how what a dead woman be able to know the names of those responsible if dead !
Who done it? A new way to earn money around that most popular question. Tastless? Without any doubt! Nevertheless, when I will meet my maker, this might be one of the questions i'd like to ask.
Tumblety has always seemed very suspicioys to me.
How can he be so jovial and yet so vicious?
Some people get their kicks off of being so vicious and find it amusing. Ted Bundy, anyone?
Embarrassingly dreadful
Rubbish
I used to think it was Francis tumblers.he was a quack doctor,who hated women...he had organs in jars,and fled to America on a ship after the last murder.he was homosexual,in the area at the time of the murders..and one of the rippers letter was signed dear boss,an American term
And there was that murder in New York I think after the murders in London stopped.. same MO as in London
Serial killers tend to have victims of the sex they are attracted to. If Francis Tumblety was gay, I would have thought he would kill men
My thoughts too.
No thanks.
Could you show where Jacob Levy lived and where his butcher shop was?
The thing is jack the ripper is not connected by a hospital i asked a medium who did not know much about jack the ripper claims he was a butcher which means he could hide in plain site and some suspected a butcher but i cant remember a name.
the first of the canonical murders was in Bucks Row Polly Anne Nichols went there with her Killer from the Whitechapel Road just round the back of the Tube Station at the front of the station opposite is London Hospital where the Elephant Man was currently residing , some say the killer came from the Hospital ref "Ripper Confidential " Tom Westcott
@@christopherwright4573 true but whos to say he didnt kill other women to learn there biology
@@stephenwhite3967 i am convinced the killer killed before and after the canonical 5 Martha Tabram is a dead cert if you pardon the expression ,he was definitely disturbed on the murder of Nichols this i the best documentary so far ua-cam.com/video/UIyAMo-fms0/v-deo.html Charles Lechmere is my no1 suspect no2 Carl Feigenbaum a merchant seaman (Whitechapel 12min walk from the docks ) who ended up in New York comiting two similar crimes before being sent to the chair ole sparky .My most ridiculous suspects 1) Royal conspiracy and all that goes with it 2) Walter Sickert
Jacob Levy, he had a butchers shop on Middlesex Street. He was 5'3 and was Jewish.
Well done Lorraine , 👍😁
Well you've got the timing wrong of how long it took to murder Catherine Eddows. You've timed it from when the witnesses saw her to the time the policeman found her which are two different places, meaning it took much less than 12 minutes to commit the murder and mutilation.
She said "top hat" thats how i new it was bullshit
Aaron kolmianski i think is the ripper
Kosminski!
Is the medium scared of Jack the ripper?
Id never be able to do one of those tours… it’s not difficult to see how one could take something home ..
Very interesting great video
Thanks mate.
It could have been graffiti back in the 1800's.
Strangely even before I watched this video I suspected for a while that the killer had some sort Surgeon type background like a doctor, and when I heard Lorraine mention the surgeon background a few times again I got goosebumps. Well done Lorraine, you have been spiritually gifted.
I’ve been studying case for a while and by looking at the obvious similarities of the wounds on all his victims it was obvious that only a top medical surgeon could surgically cut and remove certain body parts. And the motive could be as Lorraine said to further be in the top in the medical profession. I wouldn’t be surprised if more physics like her will she’d more on the medical/surgeon background in the future investigations. Well done Lorraine. 😊👍
Nothing new she is telling here.. the speculation about a doctor beeing involved goes on since decades
Could have been a butcher
@@vickykeitley4217 yes maybe.
In England did they have pimps?
I guess the Johnny Depp movie, From Hell, was more on the nose than we knew 😏 support interesting though.
There was a *Sir Robert Alexander Chermside* on Queen Victoria medical staff, tho not her personal doctor. That was sir james reid. Robert Alexander doesn't fit with all she is saying tho. He died a grandfather.
She watched that movie apparently,...probably her only research.
Is he from England or america?
She makes mediumship a joke there are honest mediums out there she is not one anybody whos read about the cases can do this !
The medium is a fake , Mary says stop it
The names Jack gave you were fake. He doesn't have the guts to tell you his real name.
You actually believe that woman was in contact with Jack the Ripper? Can I sell you some beachfront property in Nebraska? It's going cheap, but keep in mind it is beachfront!
@@TheIndependentLens hahaha he is some fool for sure😆🤭
ehh RONALD VILLERS widicome and pump
Absolute s.h.i.t.e. Psychic my arse!
I believe two men were involved one who had a clay smoking pipe which was left in the fireplace of Mary Kelly room
Women smoked clay pipes back then too.
I'm investigating this case. I want to close the legend. I want to expose this bastard's mask.
A noble aim. Good luck
WHAT A LOAD OF BOLLOCKS
2.30 aaaaand this is stupid I'm out
Do ppl believe this 😂😂😂
Soooo fake never listen to a medium there really no such thing.
I have a feeling jack the ripper was american
Why?
@@rachelraquel758 just have a feeling he was
😆
He might have been an alien from Mars. The odds are the same as him being American.
Dr Francis Tumblety not little green men from mars
very good
The partabout the queen docktor ties in with whatt my dad said about the case Icant get past Lechmere as beeing the cculprit . ttfn&ty