Planned Parenthood unveils its first-ever call for SCOTUS reform
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 лис 2024
- Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson joins Jen Psaki to discuss the organization's first-ever call for Supreme Court expansion and for term limits on Supreme Court Justices.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: on.msnbc.com/Su...
Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/...
ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/...
MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: on.msnbc.com/Re...
Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersUA-cam
Find MSNBC on Facebook: on.msnbc.com/Li...
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: on.msnbc.com/Fo...
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: on.msnbc.com/In...
#PlannedParenthood #SCOTUS #JenPsaki
Finally, someone with the balls to call out the SCOTUS Corruption,
That's because she's got ovaries!
You are free to criticize SCOTUS all you want and always have been. That is a silly statement you made. It takes no "balls" to speak out against any branch of government in the USA.
IMPEACH Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and keep an eye on little Amy and Brett......
Brett got money also. Amy unfortunately does appear to only be in it for the religious motivations. In terms of monetary corruption she appears to be ethical in that category. She just wants to ensure that she forces her bulshit onto everyone else in the country
Impeach her for lying at the gate. She is incapable of unbiased opinion.
impeach all the wingnuits on the court...they are evil incarnate
@@UlexiteTVStoneLexite I don’t know if you’re correct. I saw her together with Alito speaking at the Federalist Society conference. She joked about the people who protested her decision on Roe. I’m pretty sure she’s in their pocket.
It is clear that the American experiment of having politicians pick judges has failed. Politicians pick judges based on politics not on legal ability. Appointment of judges should be a purely independent administrative exercise, not a political one.
How?
Justin Stephenson, Also, Supreme Court judges should be required to have law degrees. I was absolutely shocked when I pulled that up and found out they are not required to have one. Also, Congressional members should all be required to have degrees!! Almost all Federal Government positions require at minimum of a bachelor's degree to work in public service anymore. No one like Lauren Boebert should be allowed to make decisions & introduce bills that have effects upon every citizen in the country. Not ever, she just doesn't have enough knowledge or skills to fulfill the duties of her position.
corrupt clarence contradicts court's credibility
So does corrupt, criminal, fascist Biden
@@ronswanson2029 Why don't you do your research? His picture, along with that of Harlan Crow should be next to the word corruption in the dictionary.
Please point out specifically how justice Thomas is corrupt. You racist are upset with Justice Thomas and his white wife and you are stooping to any lowlife means to disrespect this Justice. And he was invited to a friends house for vacation and for a dinner and your panties are in a twist about this yet you see nothing wrong with Justice Sotomayer, receiving millions of dollars from her book publisher, and rather than rescind herself, she sat on cases pertaining to her publisher.
You racist need to crawl back under your rock and have a seat next to the KKK.
@Gender AffirmingCare No.I think for myself. I have the ability to distinguish right from wrong and to understand the difference between fascism and democracy, which are polar opposites. I was raised in a Republican household. Nixon, in pursuit of power, broke the law and became a criminal. Reagan tried to eliminate the middle class, and Trump has been pro Russia for 40 years. Eric Trump, in a moment of candor, admitted the Trump corporation hot all its money from Russia. Russia is our enemy, but they are a friend of Trump. They, along with Trump's blessing, invaded an independent, increasingly DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY. Putin didn't like that. My guess is that Putin ordered Trump to withdraw from NATO so that Putin would be handed Ukraine on a platter. Trump was so busy grifting off the presidency and with his impulsive behavior, probably thought NATO could wait. As we have seen, Putin couldn't wait and invaded an independent country. Facts like this matter. Wake up and see them
@@ronswanson2029 Good one 😁 (🙈🙉🙊)
Term limits for the judiciary at the Federal level is long overdue. There is no reasonable explanation for letting judges stay in the courtroom for life. We recognize that generational attitudes toward religious, and social issues change, and from the level of federal district judges up to SCOTUS we have opinions that were formed 2 generations ago. Why would we not have Congress moving to limit judiciary terms and terms for Representatives and Senators? Old doesn't always translate into wise or current.
question is if it can be done without a constitutional amendment
it may be able if there is a rotation system
@@thewkovacs316
That would also require amending the Constitution.
LOL no. We won't allow that.
@@stevenwiederholt7000 which is perfectly allowed per the constitution.
@@Khronogi
Good Luck!
There are 12 Justices: the 9 appointed, plus Harlan Crow, Jenni, and John Roberts' wife.
Oh man, you said it.
There are 12 Judicial Districts. Why aren't there 12 Supreme Court Justices? It's been 9 since 1860!
Lets add 3 💙💙💙
@Gender AffirmingCare The Constitution doesn't place a limit on how many Supreme Court justices there are. All it takes is an act of Congress to expand the Court.
But that won't stop this from happening . . . Standards and consequences that are enforced. Clarence Thomas is clearly unfit yet there he is. We could ram 3 more in but the court could be packed by nationalist. Separation of Church and State. Ethical standards upheld quickly are essential.
@GenderAffirmingCare-nk6dy ok make it a bakers dozen 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
Correction 13.
When the Founders decided on lifetime court appointments, life expectancy was VERY different. Wealthy, white, landed gentry--the only ppl the Founders allowed to vote, and the only ppl who could feasibly participate in government, especially at the highest levels--on average lived til their late 40s, early 50s. On average, the first SCOTUS justices were in their 30s when they were appointed. So it stands to reason the Founders expected most Justices to be on the court for around 20 years. I think a 20 year term is more than fair, and perhaps even a little long, but we all know how Repugs like to call back to the Founders, and that seems like a good basis for making term limits.
I also think some Justices should be elected, according to population and region--it shouldn't be like the Senate, where voters from low population states get WAY more representation than voters in populous states. But each region should PROPOTIONALLY by population get to elect Justices to the SCOTUS, that way they'll be held accountable to some degree by voters. Altho that shouldn't replace an ethical framework that's overseen by Congress, which is obviously necessary, given the Roberts court has shown an utter inability to police itself.
Altho elections of Justices won't be fair until each adult in America is automatically registered to vote when they turn 18. As far as the worry about dead ppl voting, that's easy to solve, death certificates should be sent to the registrar of voters, so ppl who've died can be taken off the voter rolls. As far as privacy issues, the death certificates could be under seal, & only the necessary person or ppl at the registrars office would be allowed to see them, and they would be considered sensitive documents so registrar workers could be criminally prosecuted for revealing them.
The only voters who've been arrested for double voting in the past two elections were Republicans trying to prove it can be done. There's been functionally almost no voter fraud in the US, certainly not near enough to effect outcomes. The 63 judges that adjudicated Spanky's claims about the 2020 election, all agreed there was no fraud. The recounts done by Republicans in AZ confirmed Biden won, the AZ recounts done by the super cyber team of Trumpists not only confirmed Biden won, but their recount actually added votes to Joe Biden's total. Spanky just can't admit he's a loser.
people lived much longer....life expectancy included children dying....many died in infancy
but very few on scotus or in the judiciary served into ther 70s or beyond
Washington lived to 67. Hamilton 59. Serving 30-40 years was NOT normal in the slightest.
@@TheRealBlueValhalla adams and jefferson lived to 90
hamilton died in a duel....you are silly
Bro does not understand life expectancy 😂😂😂
And while we’re at it let’s get rid of the electoral college
men have bodily autonomy. if women do not have bodily autonomy we are not equal citizens under the law. i don’t know why activists aren’t framing the argument in this way.
Because we are afraid of having those rights taken also my guess.
Trolls are still afraid of Jen .. how interesting.
That's because Jen doesn't wear makeup and she looks like Fright Night 24 - 7! Be afraid...be very afraid! 😂
You know what Amber, you could be right. We’re not afraid of Jen as a person. We saw the propaganda machine at work throughout covid and we saw how people like you got people fired from their jobs, ridiculed people who asked questions, made fun of people for doing their own research instead of blindly falling in line. And it turns out the people who had questions were right and people like you are still keeping the covidian cult going strong and we just wish you’d wake the f up.
This is so funny!!!! The trolls got triggered here! Hahahaha!
Cool post! Thanks!
@fosterpainter thats why it stays out of her mouth.
Here in the UK we do not have these problems. One the courts can only interpret and apply an Act of Parliament not call it unconstitutional and overturn it. Two judges [and bishops] have to retire after their 75th birthday. Three judges are appointed from the ranks of lawyers with years of experience at the bar and only promoted to a higher court or the Supreme Court [the Law Lords] after years of experience in the lower courts. Four judges are not appointed for their political views
Duncan Macpherson, Supreme Court judges in our country don't even require law degrees. How is that possible? Most all positions in the Federal Government require at minimum, a bachelor's degree. Just to have a public service position with the Federal Government. That is wrong, morally WRONG. A Supreme Court judge doesn't have to have a law degree but a GS-7 Cartographic Technician does require a four year degree.
Expand SCOTUS to 20+ justices, 12 year terms, each presidential term sees 5+ new justices seated. Cases are heard by 7 justices chosen by lottery (as is currently standard in lower courts). Justices that vote to grant cert can't hear those cases.
This is a very intelligent solution and seems to be fair to both sides
I agree with term limits. Expand to 12 justices to match the district courts. And i LOVE the lottery idea.
A special Happy Mothers Day to those unfortunate women who were forced by some State Governments and men to be Mothers.❤
The “Barbie Dream House” should not be an age-appropriate Mothers Day gift.
@@truthhurts9246 just because you can't experience it doesn't mean you get to minimize the trauma done to other people
@@UlexiteTVStoneLexite Some abortions are medically necessary when the mother miscarriages but the baby has to be aborted to save the woman's life. Lest she dies carrying a dead baby is a better solution, let the scientists know please.
@FriendofBlacks-hm1ml Some abortions are medically necessary when the mother miscarriages but the baby has to be aborted to save the woman's life. Lest she dies carrying a dead baby is a better solution, let the scientists know please.
@@truthhurts9246 it's not exceedingly rare. It happens all the time. Birth control fails and half of your people that are going to get an abortion are doing so because of failed birth control methods. If you force a woman to give birth you are forcing her to do something against her will something that you cannot possibly
Amen to term limits!
Justices MUST have term limits, and Congress should only serve two terms like the President
Lifetime appointments = Monarchy. The United States was founded in opposition to this idea. Term limits should be universal for every governmental position.
"Choice" is about more than abortion; it is about your entire life.
I LIKE this lady and support EVERYTHING she has to say!!! It all rests on the statement that states are NOT to be deciding our rights....and what she did not say is church and government are to be kept separate! when did that part of the constitution get struck down?
*When Supreme Justices don't respect the laws and behave lawlessness, why would they have to expect people to respect laws and behave lawfully???? THE JUDICIARY INSTITUTIONS MUST BE REFORMED. BUT FIRST, GET A 3/4 DEMOCRATIC PARTY MAJORITY IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE. THEN REFORM THE SUPREME COURT BY AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION TO PROVIDE FOR **_INCREASING THE NUMBER OF JUSTICES_** AND **_APPLYING TERM LIMITS OF JUDICIARY SERVICE FOR SUPREME JUSTICES!!!_*
No amendment necessary,
Right on Lady , we are so behind you !!!!!
People need to start following and ridicule these judges IN PUBLIC sun up to sun down.
What will change this is restrictive states not having OBGYN and gynecology staff support so that women in their state are left with no options. It is strange that these same ppl who hate for women to have contraceptive and reproductive choices so much so that they are forced to have babies, also don't want women to have paid leave, child care options, universal healthcare, etc. If you care about women having healthy babies, you should care about their options after they give birth, too.
Awesome.
Every civilization has had a priest class that likes sacrifice.
Mandatory vasectomies for all males at age 13. We have to stop the wanton impregnating of women by these out of control tomcat men! The vasectomy can be reversed once the man is married and ready for a family.
Adoption and abstinence exist
@@SpaceBethC131 nope. If we are going to control womens bodies and demand that they carry a baby to term, then we can control a man's body as well. Mandatory vaccinations until the man is ready to have children.
Can an executive order by the President can put more judges on the court?
No
@Gender AffirmingCare Not by executive order, but it can be done because it has been done in the past.
Fascist Biden? There's no democracy since he corruptly took office. Just corruption
Yep, FDR threatened the court.
Exec orders can be reversed by the next president.
Good!
Rep. Johnson Introduces Supreme Court Justice Term Limit Measure to Restore Balance, Legitimacy for SCOTUS - Look it up. It's a bill already in process and should receive the support of anyone concerned. Last Action: It has been referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
I agree with her
great job by planned parenthood of getting ahead of the telegraphed moves by the right. superb foresight
In theory, a US President could propose expanding the number of Supreme Court Justices and advocate for it. However, since the power to pass laws resides with Congress, the President would ultimately need the support and cooperation of *BOTH* houses of Congress to pass such legislation.
Expanding the number of Supreme Court Justices is a significant decision with far-reaching implications, and historically, changes to the Court's size have been relatively rare. It would likely require substantial political consensus and support from both the Democrat party *and the Republican party to successfully pass such legislation.*
Hello from hamou fahem Algeria
please give us term limits and a code of ethics.
The conservative court says that they want the court to be solely focused on the law.
Most of the court's errors have been when they took on the role of historians, linguists or scientists. Take those roles from the supreme court and create a supreme body patterned after the courts for nonpartisan nonjudicial decisions.
SCOTUS does not have the power to eliminate established CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
🎯
The Supreme Court looks really bad, they should have term limits and ethical responsibility, accountability. People should vote for them. Donations and perks on all levels should be extremely limited and no other Country should donate or give perks. Those who are in all the offices should have surprise drug testing's, results know publicly. Personally, I am against abortion unless it's medically needed. However, not everyone thinks as I do. I do believe in free choice, but with options/information/education. I think Doctors need to be Doctors, not looking over their shoulder to see if they are following the rules. The Insurance Company's, Medicare, Hospital Policy's, and Politian's are not Doctors and should not act as if they are, they have too much power over the Doctors. Every patient healing process is different and maybe they need to run expensive tests or the same tests over, maybe they need the new expensive meds, people should be treated as the doctor feels it is needed, and not what they are allowed to do or not do.
The non supreme court should have thirteen seats just like the apellet courts. No more no less.
13 Justices, same ethics as all other judges, mandatory movement from active judge to judge emeritus at 75 with limited role for special assignments. ELECT A DEMOCRATIC SENATE IN A LANDSLIDE IN 2024 or forget most other reforms!
If the President can ask a Supreme Court Justice to step up, the President should be empowered to ask them to step down...for cause.
Will Alito see this and cry that she was mean ?
Ignore trolls in some comments….because trolls are just trolls.
They came out in droves on this one. This tells me this one is important.
IT'S ABOUT TRUST. These people don't trust women to be able to make the right choices for themselves, their bodies, and their _potential_ offspring, so they want to take the choice away. Women are just as intelligent and capable as men, and the person who is pregnant is the ONLY person who has the ability and the right to make that choice, right or wrong.
It’s about control.
@fosterpainter Pregnancy isn't contagious.
Enough with all the talk! Start a petition where we can all sign it! Thanks
If we garner the political power to pass something like the Women's Health Protection Act and it is challenged in court, and goes to the SCOTUS and they declare the law unconstitutional for some reason, we will have no choice, but to rework the court by increasing the number of justices.
Something has to give at some point. We have congress people wearing depends taking medicine for dementia we have SCOTUS Judges working for billionaire right wing extremists and not reporting any of the gifts (behavior of guilt)
Retirement age like federal judges!!! More congressional districts too (larger pie more to share) . Popular vote presidential election?
The trouble with calls for reform that originate with dissatisfaction with the decision in Wade, is that the Roe decision was arguably not good jurisprudence. That decision is not flawed because of where it landed on abortion, it was importing to the Constitution of a right to privacy. The Court over time had bent itself into pretzels on that one and the argument could (and was) be successfully made that the court erred in so doing. Other things fall from that. The court will make politically unpopular decisions. That is an occasional corollary if doing its job. It is not of itself a basis for ‘reform’. There are many reasons for reform apart from this. Thomas most forcefully makes that case and it would be true whether he were Republican or Democrat. But let’s not forget that the court has been placed in a position of doing Congress’s job for it. Reform cannot be limited to one branch.
So naïve! You can't find a court. That's called shopping for venue and is not favored. The entire judiciary is bad.
Every 4 years 3 justices are picked. 1st by president, 2nd by majority party of senate and 3rd by 2nd largest party of Senate.
There are enough Judges, Magistrates and Lawyers (peers) across America to vote and conduct the selection and appointment process. Take the selective process off biased and corrupt Political parties and organisations like the Federalist Society.
Important discussion, but either change Psaki’s makeup or please stop showing closeups of her.
Connecting the dots there about how we are living in this space… don’t listen to these people
Typical Liberal
Margaret Sanger would be proud 🖕🖕🖕
Happy mothers day to all the mothers out there who chose life. And happy reproductive rights day to all those who didn't.
Sometimes having an abortion is choosing life. How many women and girls must die, because evil men won't allow them lifesaving abortions?
@@deborahfreedman333 Lifesaving abortions? What a stupid thing to say.
@@deborahfreedman333 congrats, you broke that poor little troll Archie's brain with facts. Well done!
@@archieclement2977 Some abortions are medically necessary when the mother miscarriages but the baby has to be aborted to save the woman's life. Lest she dies carrying a dead baby is a better solution, let the scientists know please.
@@mooseheadjack1 Some abortions are medically necessary when the mother miscarriages but the baby has to be aborted to save the woman's life. Lest she dies carrying a dead baby is a better solution, let the scientists know please.
Start with TERM.LIMITS >instead of lifetime appointments
Test drive a Tesla tomorrow. It’s fun and it’s free.
Ever notice This was not a problem/issue until there was a 6-3 Conservative majority? My how strange!
Candidates for Supreme Court Justice must be well schooled in the Constitution. They must understand and respect the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Candidates for Supreme Court Justice must also be well-versed on the letters sent back-and-forth by the founders, discussing the various issues to be included in the constitution.
As an example, ‘The Right to Travel’, was under serious discussion by the founders, but it was decided that the right to travel was so basic, and so fundamental that there was no reason to include it in the constitution. Nevertheless, the founders did give the federal government supremacy over Post Roads. We will find this supremacy in Article 1, Section 8. Now we see states attempting to infringe on this right to travel by the issuance of drivers licenses, imposing fees, and taxes.
We saw the Roberts court, finally wake up to the fact that there is nothing within the US constitution permitting abortion, or abortive procedures, and they struck down a 50 year old decision that was improperly rendered. It is now up to the activists in the states to convince their respective legislatures to invoke procedures for abortion, whatever that might be.
So rather than have candidates for the supreme court based on political affiliation or activism, the justices should be well-versed in all aspects of the constitution. Support and defend the constitution.
*HAPPY MOTHERS DAY* !!! *PLAN YOUR ABORTION TODAY* !
More like "I only want 4 children, not 40." This isn't the 19th century and before. I am pretty sure your wife doesn't want to carry your spawn from puberty to menopause, numbnuts.
Mother’s sometimes need abortions too. Your ignorance of complex health issues and dangerous pregnancies disqualifies you from having a valid opinion.
Statistically speaking, at least a half of women who are in need of abortions are already mothers.
@@sunnymountainhoneyfountain "Complex"? Murder is not very "complex", but your rationalization of it is.
I always forget how big a business abortion is ....Planned Parent is a big mover and money maker....Democracy -Rights -Baloney ...
Too bad. Really. So is your church and your military industrial complex
How about blood transfusions?
You don’t think blood transfusions is big business?
Let’s outlaw blood transfusions.
Jehovah’s witnesses are against blood transfusions the same way the Catholics are against abortion.
Everything in healthcare is business. If you want to outlaw the entire healthcare system because it’s for profit, then good luck to you.
Planned parenthood was kicked out of Argentina i wonder why lol
Um...They're stupid religious?
Sorry but decisions being in step with popular opinion is not a criterion for criticism of SC. I believe the SC has made some recent decision(s) that are not consistent with the full reading of the Constitution - their job - but theoretically if an opinion is truely in the majority then even when SC makes a decision contrary to it the voters should eventually be able to self-correct that decision by making it irrelevant through the ballot box. However, given the validity of the SC is entirely granted by the population's belief that it is incorrupt and trustworthy this Court is already a long way down the path to irrelevance and they should take immediate steps to prevent that.
Sorry, but you're wrong, especially since activists on the right, on the court, are willing to manipulate the understanding of the Constitution, and make it mean the opposite of what it does, to further their agenda.
Since you are not threatened with death by the "unpopular " decisions, why are you voicing an opinion? When you are held prisoner by an unwanted pregnancy or forced into a near death situation by a dead, dying, or non-viable fetus, then you have a voice about your body. No other body. Your body. When you are affected by one of the worst scotus decisions, then your voice must be heard. The corrupt court chose its poison, no reason we should all suffer for their corruption.
There are many ways to not conceive. Murder doesn’t have to happen.
True. Criminal Cartel Bidens been murdering Americans with an unsecured border since he corruptly took office. Now wants to murder Americans babies. Go communist blue
Not your choice to make for everyone thus the problem.
That's on opinion based on your religion in all likelihood.
Women have been ending pregnancies when they feel it's not the right time since women have been around. Sometimes it is the right decision.
We don't have to like it.
Roe vs. Wade was already settled a long time ago.
Making it a political issue was stupid and unnecessary to say the least. It needs to go back to the Supreme Court, sooner then later actually they should clarify it and set legal boundaries on these states who are doing real damage to women's health and personal choice. If you listen to some of these morons you'll be thinking that women are just lining up for abortions as a form of birth control, that's not a thing.
Anyone who thinks it is has been listening to politics, not reality.
Any day a woman has to make that choice is likely one of the hardest days of their life .. last thing she needs is some politically induced induced induced induced BS
Well then spread the word to all your buddies, 'cuz they didn't get the message.
It's none of your business.
And there is no one hundred percent form of birth control so your point is pretty moot. You still don't force a person to give birth just because birth control measures failed or because they forgot.
And murder involves a person which a fetus has yet to become because it doesn't have any consciousness or awareness
Karma for rigging the 2016 primary for Hillary
Is your fairy tale fantasies why your mother never loves you?
It’s Mother’s Day and this is the report that MSDNC thought was appropriate. Just cannot make this stuff up.
Baby killers don't have morals.
Seems appropriate considering Republicans think they can FORCE women to be mothers.
Mother’s sometimes need abortions too. Your ignorance of complex health issues and dangerous pregnancies disqualifies you from having a valid opinion.
Is your fairy tale fantasies why your mother doesn't love you?
Hey Tony! You're still here? Hey how's that Tucker thing going? Doesn't look like it's doing so well, does it?
OMG that thumbnail, lol. She looks like a wraith.
I guess it really isn't the thumbnail, though she looks generally normal in video instead of still frame.
Great points though, court reform to fight capture, yes!
I'm always willing to listen to the ideas of organizations founded upon racist ideas, you know, like Democrats.
Just say “No” to harlots 😂
🤣😂 this from a guy every woman says NO to.
@@VV-lz1xp what is a woman?
@@guylanctot4395 How about you take responsibility and get snipped?
@@guylanctot4395 someone you will never have to worry or concern yourself with.
Found the incel
I have never understood why men don't get any say in abortion, being the father. i always felt if the mom doesn't want the baby the father should get an option to raise that child. A man can be forced to pay child support but they have no rights when it comes to having a baby. Why is there no group that fights for fathers rights.
Because it's not his body. He never loved her if he's forcing her to use her body against her will
Grow up. Okay?
Because it's not the man's body. Do you want women to be treated as property? The man doesn't get to use the woman as an incubator
I was being serious. I know a man that desperately wanted his baby but had no choice. I don't know a solution, but it makes me sad.
@@UlexiteTVStoneLexite what about the women that have kids with men just to get their money. I just feel that men should have some rights. I don't know how to do it, but I feel bad for the fathers that want the babies.
Destroy the system when you don't get what you want...yeah that seems like a sustainable society. . .
That's a stretch. They're talking about reformation.
Fascist Biden is destroying the system, he's destroying everything
@@ronswanson2029 Change it by adding more judges to the court, term limits, ethical accountability, a wider representation of the voting populace.....etc. etc. etc.
@@treverblanco you can call it ''rainbow enema's'' but most people understand you want to stick something in their rump.
Everything from the electoral college to individual rights are fair game to todays radicals.
How about we just allow states rights, and people can live in a place that have laws that fit their beliefs?
@@DavidTa2 You wouldn't be talking about adding judges if they ruled the way you wanted.
You'd be telling us how you want a system where the judges get to hand pick their own replacements, and how they should be appointed for life.
Come off it.
Happy Mothers day pro-choice abortionists!
Because abortions are necessary for many women because 20% of all pregnancies fail and oftentimes you require an abortion to remove everything
Statistically speaking, at least a half of women who are in need of abortion are already mothers.
You’re being brainwashed about an essential part of gynecological healthcare.
It’s pretty sad that your mind is this gullible.
This is their way of retaliating against the supreme court for overturning Roe v wade
Its not a "retaliation", its a response.
Go corrupt communist blue
@@DavidTa2 It’s retaliation straight up! It’s also radicalizing lib fools to keep the hate and division strong.
The supreme court of America has become a tool for imposing christofascist ideology on the entire population of a country that’s supposed to separate church and state and provide religious freedom and bodily autonomy to all it’s citizens. It’s in the constitution, so presently the supreme court is working against the inalienable freedoms of americans. It needs reformations in order to be inline with democratic will of the people.
Because the supreme Court took away our rights yeah
Jen, love the bedhead hair and makeup. NOT
Jen Psaki thinks she is so pretty that she doesn't even have to brush her hair.
No more LIFETIMIE appointments! At best make it 2 years and make an ETHICAL CODE that they all must follow. Before appointing one, do an extensive BACKGROUND check...a really deep dive! Get rid of Thomas, Beer-Boy Brett and the Hand-Maiden.
Unplanned family hood starts with responsibility....gen z ain't having that
No. Nobody is having you being nosey and invasive. Nobody. Get that through your head
@@rensinclair4218 I never know what you are saying...put a rubber on it soy boy
How about mind your own business? Too hard for you?
@@anewleaf6847 mind your own business. If you weren't such an incel you might understand
@@anewleaf6847 Unplanned pregnancy is called unplanned for a reason, it’s an accident.
Responsibility isn’t applicable to accidents. You’re saying stupid things.