1/2 Jake And Dinos Chapman - What Do Artists Do All Day ?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 74

  • @iammt.
    @iammt. Рік тому +18

    Anyone here after that whole balenciaga mess?

    • @zackdeew9757
      @zackdeew9757 Рік тому +2

      me,, these sick people should be lock up where they should belong!!

  • @stephenpardue2052
    @stephenpardue2052 Рік тому +16

    I hope that one day someone buys the entire Chapman collection for a quarter and burns it to the ground.

    • @mpolanetz
      @mpolanetz Рік тому +3

      Instead of wasting money on such evil IT should be just ALL burnt down! THis is not art BUT they are telling the world the truth of the evil that exists and that THEY Are a part of

    • @sb416
      @sb416 Рік тому

      Exactly there needs to be an assassins creed for these mfs

  • @RadagonTheRed
    @RadagonTheRed 7 років тому +40

    The only skill artists like these actually have, is the ability to speak for an extended length of time, in a manner that sounds profound, without actually saying anything at all.

  • @OPs1-1
    @OPs1-1 Рік тому +8

    Their work being destroyed by fire in 2004 was a sign..

    • @user-bx4ti6ig3i
      @user-bx4ti6ig3i Рік тому

      Needs to happen again and not resurface.

    • @sb416
      @sb416 Рік тому +1

      HAHAHA!!! Really?!? That’s amazing I’m so happy all their trash burned to the ground :)

  • @midge86
    @midge86 Рік тому +18

    The stuff he is drawing is demonic and other things he has done is shocking lock him and his bro up for this stuff

    • @LalaaCherry
      @LalaaCherry Рік тому +4

      I definitely agree!!!!!! As an artist , you create what is in your soul.this is them and it’s terrifying

    • @prouddanyxo
      @prouddanyxo Рік тому +1

      They will rot in hell

    • @sb416
      @sb416 Рік тому

      @@prouddanyxothey need to be unalived

  • @May-May-Sue
    @May-May-Sue Рік тому +6

    Sooooo fucking sick, how come this shit is not investigated by the Interpol??? These people need to be in a high security mental facility

  • @spd13062
    @spd13062 9 років тому +6

    These are a trippy fucking couple of dudes...

  • @jbaby007
    @jbaby007 9 років тому +13

    I always admire those who can paint super bad ass painting with watercolors. I find them difficult.

  • @mysterymccarthy6851
    @mysterymccarthy6851 3 роки тому +7

    That was disappointing and disheartening to watch, I couldn't make it to the end.

    • @jamieorourke767
      @jamieorourke767 3 роки тому +1

      For goodness sake!.
      Give your head a wobble

    • @sb416
      @sb416 Рік тому

      Made me want to Jill them

  • @matjazi8752
    @matjazi8752 Рік тому

    They are everywhere.

  • @carlotagibbs6688
    @carlotagibbs6688 5 місяців тому

    Arte inspirada desde el mismo infierno

  • @shandywarhol4444
    @shandywarhol4444 11 місяців тому

    3:33 Tell me about it!! 🥴Kx

  • @amck6850
    @amck6850 5 років тому +11

    Desecrating authentic Goya prints is disgusting and horrible

    • @watermelonface10
      @watermelonface10 5 років тому +6

      why? why do you care so much about pieces you probably never think about in your every day life? Isn't it far more exciting to make new, fresh work out of the old? Goya's work can be printed, re printed, found all over the internet and all over the world. I think this is what the Chapman's are trying to make us realise, that these old works are stale, they need to be reworked into something new, and something controversial like this makes people think. it's pretty cool in a way.

    • @DeathSquadDesign
      @DeathSquadDesign 4 роки тому +2

      Those prints were made 30+ years after Goya was already dead.

    • @BlueNorth313
      @BlueNorth313 Рік тому +1

      @@watermelonface10 You couldn't be dumber if you tried. No work of art is stale. What's stale is someone's imagination when the only way they can "create" something new is by distorting something that was already there. That's not creation at all, it's destruction. tHiS mAkEs PeOpLe ThInK. This makes me wanna vomit.

  • @SamuelBlackMetalRider
    @SamuelBlackMetalRider 3 роки тому +2

    Geniuses. « Hell » was monumental. « F*cking Hell » even more so. Mind blowing

  • @hellenegogos3946
    @hellenegogos3946 10 років тому +5

    Are these hellish fiends appropriated in a rudely provocative notion. Am i truly amazed by the nature of their interest -in some way i am intrigued. Does this romantic notion of emotional turmoil, hellbound horror and shock ever going to change the way i see Goyas old works reformed and repainted with watercolour? Living with art from the old hat and re-setting this into another parallel universe is cartoonish to me. Conceptual -yes. Do we need this? Does the day to day nature of prosaic art show what? - insulting- possibly, grabbing the attention, yes, offering imagination that goes beyond the super-grotesque.
    Not as hellish as Hieronymous Bosch art?

    • @hellenegogos3946
      @hellenegogos3946 10 років тому +1

      Happy belated Birthday too! Well a good bloody question....now thats a conundrum.

    • @hellenegogos3946
      @hellenegogos3946 8 років тому +1

      Yes, " The Garden of Earthly Delights." life.

  • @theLoneDarkHorse
    @theLoneDarkHorse 10 років тому +15

    I find there work interesting. But the manner of fact they have desecrated Goya works is disgraceful. Ok fair enough if they were just prints, but just as I see, destroy the originals for the sake of getting popularity? If this is so you two know not of the true meaning of art.

    • @doppelbanger5797
      @doppelbanger5797 10 років тому +10

      their art is very juvenile to me, i used to alter my toy soldiers when i was 12, and to destroy original prints is shocking

    • @francescaviceconti3770
      @francescaviceconti3770 9 років тому +2

      J.P. Scott Arts they acquired a book of Goya's prints; so the originals haven't been defaced...

    • @amck6850
      @amck6850 5 років тому

      @@francescaviceconti3770 no they were original. I googled it when they said they got ahold of Goya prints.

    • @XeCeXify
      @XeCeXify 4 роки тому

      @@amck6850 I doubt they are originals, they would be going for so much, that they wouldn't even be able to purchase them, also there would be no way museums would allow this atrocity to even occur, there would been an uproar amongst top art museum organisations. The way one is feed to believe this, shows the true manipulation of these artists. Also never believe anything on the internet, most of the information is usually false.

    • @samphazm
      @samphazm 3 роки тому

      @@XeCeXify They actually are original prints. Purchased with a lot of money, with help from the gallery that represented them. There are quite a few sets of editions that were worked on.

  • @sylviapineda6717
    @sylviapineda6717 5 років тому +1

    Awesome, palm 🌴springs, calif fan, thanks.

  • @leslieiannottacronin2176
    @leslieiannottacronin2176 5 років тому +2

    Obviously they are talented, but their work comes across as a poke in the eye.

    • @dansisco3076
      @dansisco3076 4 роки тому +2

      Congratulations....... that is exactly the “ POINT “ of their work. 🎯. Bull’s eye... Leslie. !

    • @davidwills5626
      @davidwills5626 4 роки тому

      They must be doing something right as they employ others to turn their ideas into art that has to sell to pay bills.as with most top artists they are very good with words & would love one of their works if i had the money.

  • @frankjamesbonarrigo7162
    @frankjamesbonarrigo7162 7 років тому +6

    what is "real" art? A painting of a vase?

    • @chadsimmons6347
      @chadsimmons6347 4 роки тому +1

      I suppose Art is candy for the eye, make believing your admiration, is for fools.

  • @dansisco3076
    @dansisco3076 4 роки тому

    The scale, pique’s your curiosity and before you realize what’s happening you are being intimately Acquainted with the graphic horror of man’s inhumanity to man!
    🔎. 👺💀👁. N-technicolored detail 🔎

  • @keeperofthecheese
    @keeperofthecheese 9 років тому +3

    8:50 - the sculpture was called "Hell" not "Hellscape", holy crap, if you're going to do a documentary, do it right.

    • @Clithero
      @Clithero 8 років тому +3

      its actually ended up being called "Fucking Hell" saw it 2 years ago in Venice

  • @reymmav9592
    @reymmav9592 8 років тому +2

    supreme

  • @polenit6390
    @polenit6390 6 років тому +3

    Does anyone think that a art and design gallery with art donated by people for people to help homeless people would be a good idea I've been volunteering for a homeless charity for three years could we buy a home run for homeless people I've meet lots of people working for low income could this work

    • @polenit6390
      @polenit6390 6 років тому +2

      Now I'm not so drunk my idea is to get contemporary artists to donate art buy a old building charge to visit never sell the art just use the profits to fund a homeless / hostile could help for ever peopleinneed sw

  • @liutasuk
    @liutasuk 5 років тому +2

    Silly😕

  • @Kurzbraten
    @Kurzbraten 8 років тому +4

    Hip-ster..s`art.

    • @Americansikkunt
      @Americansikkunt 8 років тому +2

      +Kurz Braten you really needed to edit comment? Did you erase all punctuation or something.

  • @alalalaaaabdullah2076
    @alalalaaaabdullah2076 4 роки тому +3

    the fact that they reworked Goya's pieces is just so punk rock, borderline on white were you thinking.

    • @ducc0287
      @ducc0287 3 роки тому

      ?

    • @BlueNorth313
      @BlueNorth313 Рік тому +1

      If punk rock means unoriginal, uninspired, gross and vile, then I think you're onto something.