But like even if the river was a blank he still could have checked and the guy woulda gone all in and he coulda snap called which would have been easier.
Thank you so much!!! Literally 1 hour after watching this video I was in a 1/3nl game and was put in almost the exact same position only the villain had KJdd And snap raised all in, this video literally made me money within an hour of watching it.
This is probably the one tell I consciously try not to give off. Whenever I am betting the river or jamming at any point, I force myself to take about 15 seconds to pretend I am thinking. Doug polk had a good video about how he called an Isildur snap jam because most of Isildurs value range would at least need a few seconds of thought.
@@MM-gl1xz I think it's a lot more "obvious"than we might think. It's just such a weird move that even an amateur is going to take a minute to try to figure out what it might mean, and I think they'll be more inclined to call than usual
@@blakefredrickson6506 not going to work in practice. when the last card comes off, you still need some time process your actual standing in this hand. So even if he had trip 8s, he would have to process in his brain that an 8 came on and that he has a winning hand. ALso, had he had trip Aces or KK, the 8 at the end would still making think for a second or two to figure out if the hand hand completed a better full house.
This works both ways. I have been in villain's position with 8's full or 7's full and snap shoved against more experienced players as a reverse tell. They see it as a bluff and call. It really is opponent dependent as you say. If it's a less experienced player I would call every time on that runout.
i doubt that youd snap shove here, you'd still have to consider other possibilities such as AA, and that would take a second or two, so i dont see how you'd snap shove.
@@KronStaro Does Bart snap-check here? As soon as the river rolls out, I can take a second to decide that if my opponent checks, I'm shoving. This wouldn't take me longer than it would take the opponent to decide to check.
@@bash6404 Playing 1-2 NL, I'm in the 4 and the 2 raises to $20, I reraise to $55 with KK, and it folds around to him. He starts babbling. After about a minute he says "well I guess it's time to go" and shoves for about $300. I'm pretty sure he has aces, but I want to know for sure. So I flip up my kings in front of him and say "You're gonna have to show me the aces." He has had his head down after shoving with a baseball cap on so he doesn't realize I didn't put chips in and call. He grabs his cards, looks at me and flips up the aces. I just nodded. Then he looks at the middle of the table and says where's all the chips? I was pretty happy after that.
Funny thing about this video is that in my games the snap shove means they are really strong and they don’t even think about bet size they just try to extract max by shipping it
@@vishalshah3223 what's up with the insults? Why is it a horrible play precisely? If there is no more action the opponent can make, and you have, say quads or top boat, why would you not snap call? What possible advantage are you gaining by wasting time?
Love watching you play. I used to be such a nit. I've loosened up a lot playing the 70% type model. Sometimes I worry about playing too tight still until I watch you play. Tight is good.
I wouldn't say tight is good. Better to say "tighter is righter". if someone is button raising any 2 cards and you're playing 20% vpip on the bb, you'll lose too many blinds to ever compete with him long term. If he is raising 100% and you're calling with 70%, now you're got a better edge on him
That's interesting. I would have thought his quick action would indicate the 8 had hit a set for him, possibly a boat. Always learning something new for this rookie.
As a poker dealer, it's super easy to practice looking for live play tells without any risk of losing money. Never stare at a player as the dealer, but you can still see the tells without crossing the line. LOVE your channel btw.
@@reeferpartier100 I started by reading the Mike Caro book on poker tells and as a dealer, it was easy to practice looking for them and identifying them. The other day, I watched a player bet the turn by tossing chips away from his opponent, which is something that the book explains is usually indicative of weakness and sure enough the player folded to a raise.
That’s definitely a common tell and it is a polarizing bet when someone insta-shoves. I have seen it just as often the other way however where they have the nuts. I actually see other tells including bet sizing tells that are more reliable and more common than this. (And I play in Austin, TX for what it’s worth)
Slow action also is a good tell that its a bluff. When someone jams or bets big on the river after taking a considerably long time, and judging by the type the hand he's trying to represent, you can tell that a person is bluffing because there was no need for them to take a longer than usual time to think about their supposedly "big hand". You have to also consider the type of the hand being represented, so it doesn't apply in all situations.
I definitely have had a fair amount of rec players snap shove river on me when checked to. Yes a good amount have been bluffs but quite a few have hit their draw or improved somehow on the river. On this particular board with your hand not blocking any draws and also blocking hands that beat you I do like a call here. Nice analysis as always 👍
Very cool Bart. A lot of my friends at home games snap bet or snap jam the river when they hit what they were chasing so this is tough against very rec players but i def agree that regs and pros think a bit before value betting rivers
this is an interesting caveat. but you are right, most good thinking "pros" or regs or whatever, will take the time before value betting, even if they rivered the nuts. When they snap jam they are doing it as a reactionary thing because they know it is a card they want to jam on, and they think it will look stronger to snap jam than to think about it so they just do it quick hoping it looks strong. Good players like Bart can sniff that out though. nice hand and good call at the end here.
Jordan Patrick I play micro online and people snap jam the nuts on the river regularly. Of course, I’m playing against either regs, bots or house players so not the same situation. I looked at my losing hands and almost all my loses are river calls and I’m up huge in river bets.
Interesting hand. Nice read. If villain is a solid player I'm reading the hand as you did. But describing him as very much recreational I assumed he had a painted A. Informative stuff. Thanks
NH Sir. A few details are missing that I'm curious about. Is the villain drinking? If so how much has he had to drink? Does he know who you are? Also, is there any history between the two of you that aided your decision to call a pot size bet with a hand that can virtually only beat a bluff?
He literally just explained the tell and why snap all-in'ing with AK/AQ/any 8 makes no sense on the river. Also any 8 would probably not just call a raise on the turn due to the diamond draw, we probably would have seen more action before the river with these other hands versus a diamond draw.
Without the live tell, I would’ve folded thinking that he’s only going to raise pre-flop 7X with some kind of ace king type holding and then getting counterfeit on the river. I probably would’ve folded, but having this information you can see it’s pretty obvious and I guess given the equity you have to think of all the hand combinations you’re winning 33% of them as you said great information I actually like these almost better where it’s from your point of view, especially this where something negative happens on the river
I was in this exact spot like a year ago and he snapped all in and I called based on the tell and got showed the nuts. I hate poker. Let's go back to 2000 poker: Player: All in Opponent: Well if you have a better hand than me you win, I call. Or just have everyone play like Phil Hellmuth. Then poker would be alright.
If i know someone is bluffing and i have a bluff catcher. i will either check or bet like i am nervous basically i give a tell on purpose to draw them in 9 out of ten times it works a treat
This raises my poker IQ - detecting foolhardy behavior when there’s enough complexity you need to think. I know I am improving because now I can at least completely understand your breakdown.
My only question is do most 1/2 or 1/3 players think like that? I never play either game but I can’t stand playing 2/5 (which I used to jump in while waiting for 5/10 or 10/25 games to go). I give people too much credit and I can’t play right (mostly because they aren’t playing the way I expect them to and I can’t put them on a range nor do I fold certain hands for the amount of money bet). Many of those lower game players don’t understand position, kickers, proper bet sizing or calling ranges. Granted Im talking about years ago (when I was playing full time) and to their credit, people play much better and much different now but also because of all of the poker instruction available. I think all games have better players in them than 20 years ago. I just question my understanding of the 1/2 or 1/3 players which are the lowest buy in games in most casinos and them playing a way in which I can put them on hands. They are also almost always recreational players. They may be decent recreational players and I’m not saying anything bad about that but it’s rare to get pros in those games unless it’s a live stream (with most other players being solid) or because they are waiting for a table to open. They also have meet up games now so maybe in that too.
Question! Could you In this situation, use a blocking bet river as $65-95? Would it be a good move to deny equity to AQ , AK and make sure the draws wouldn’t bluff you? Thanks
Sorry about that. Bad luck to have it happen twice. Variance. You will reverse the scenario next time. Did u play the hands well? Yes. Forget about it and move on. Shit happens in poker. You have to stay strong mentally.
In statistics, variance is the squared difference between the outcome and the expectation... positive and negative really don't apply. You can increase and decrease variance though. I get what you are trying to say though
What about 78 for a boat or 88 for quads. I dont think villain always jams over a check-raise on turn there. 88, although unlikely, may be trapping in hope of a safe river, while 78 is probably does a bit trapping and bluff catching. Maybe the combos of these hands are insignificant when stacked against bluff combos, but villain can def auto-jam with the nuts, no? Agreed, a thinking player would think and try to gauge max value, but bad players can also show up with nuts...
The best is taking the same amount of time each time the action is on you. Unless you’re just snap folding garbage of course. Any call or raise you make, keep your time 10-15 seconds or so, making it impossible for your opponent to get a timing tell on you
If you're literally spending 10s on every decision, even when you have obvious folds or if the pot is $10, yeah that's absolutely tanking. If everyone spent that amount of time on every hand that's going to be 3+ minutes minimum for most hands which means you're seeing like 15-20 hands an hour which is abysmal even for live
@@jakegoldrich4847 like I said originally, ‘unless snap folding garbage.’ Then take 5-10 seconds, my point is try to keep your time spent fairly similar, otherwise people may pick up on a timing tell. Trying to decide whether to make a call to a big raise might require tanking, but in most situations you should try to keep spending the same amount of time when action is on you.
As others say, some players at this level are soooo bad they will snap shove with the (effective) nuts. But that seems pretty rare. Bart, you say that people will hesitate a bit in order to think about how to max value. A good player would definitely do that, but I think many players at this level aren't that good. But many players aren't that good but are good enough (which isn't very good at all) to know that when they have the nuts they need to convince the other player they aren't strong, so they will hesitate to try to convince you that they're weak. So this is another reason to call: a not-so-good player snap shoving is a sign they are trying to convince you they are strong, which means they aren't. Does this sound right?
Mark Moyer I actually find a lot of people at this level will bluff jam if they were the preflop aggressor, and ultimately found themself stuck firing 3 bullets and have too much money in the pot to fold it away. The difference is I think people at this level have more trouble diagnosing the situation and have a hard time calling a said bluff jams if they don’t have anything more than top pair.
Surely TCN fee charges makes the game sooo much cheaper. Makes me wish there was a TCH in London! Ty for all your content and analysis. You have done more than most to give top quality free live cash content for 17 years and counting!
When someone is this bad playing a story that makes no sense (e.g. he would have thought about raising the turn with a set or 2 pairs and thought about the river all in), I'd like to take a few more seconds to get a 2nd "confirmation read" on the river. Probably 90% of the time, I would go with my first read and wouldn't be able to get away from that read but the 2nd read/nonread could let you know if he's capable of being deceptive enough to play AK, set, 2 pairs that boated up in the same fashion. He showed weakness on the turn, showed extreme strength on the river all in. What kind of strength did he showed when he said all in or pushed his chips in? What kind of strength did he show while you decide what to do on the river. This is all pretty important.
If the villain is a casual rec player, and he did have AK... once the A came on the turn and he bet and you called, I would think a rec player would reasonably snap-jam any river that wasn't a diamond if he was an aggressive type player. Because like you said the rec players don't value bet enough and tend to jam instead without thinking about the bet.
His range is polarized and you are getting 2:1. Seems like a call even without the timing tell. Also, "strong when weak, and weak when strong" with rec players.
Unfortunately good players know this about pacing. I got snap raised all in just the other day when the flush came in and he had the nut flush. Admittedly that situation required less thought from him, but he did use pacing to induce a call from me.
Same exact thing just happened to me in a 1-2 game I was in while waiting for a 2-5 seat. He bet the river super fast in a situation where thought would be required 109% of the time, it smelled wrong and I called with bottom pair. He was pissed and the table was dumbfounded. Coincidentally the previous hand I folded top pair on the river to a relatively small bet, they thought I was nots, but to a thinking player they were standard plays. Sometimes it’s fun to play down and see just how (level 1) 1-2 or 1-3 plays.
i actually had villain on a KQ/KJdd. i believe i mentioned it on another of ur vids about small stakes quick jams n them being bluff heavy. the villains long pause on the turn smelled like a flush draw, too. i do look 4 quick river jams. if i have trip 8s, i bet $250 75% of the time looking 4 value. Grt hand n call.
At my tournament last Friday the guy snap went all in on the river and I had the third nuts I folded because he snapped All In if he would have thought about it for a minute I probably would have called... he had the nut flush
I played a hand last week when the flop came all diamonds and I hit a set of 3’s by I bet 10 into a limped pot and get instantly raised to 25 on A36 of diamonds Alarm went of for a moment because of how fast he raised. Turn black king I check he bets 40 I call river he instantly shoved his last $120. I beat all AK hands and call. He shows 47 of diamonds. This tell didn’t work for me.
I always get confused about regulars and recreational players, when people say "a rec" or is it "a reg". Can somebody tell me. English is not my first language.
Amano Jyaku : “a reg” means “regular player”, not necessarily a pro, but plays a lot. Probably a solid player. “A rec “ means a recreational player. Not necessarily bad, but is playing for fun, and is thus more likely to take chances.
@@halecarter7041 i knew this, but i meant when they say "a rec" or "a reg" i dont hear the difference between the two. So what is when they use that term, a regular or recreational. Anyway thanks for the reply✌🏾
nice to see more "avg Joe" level play.. by that i mean lower stakes. i would love to try higher stakes, but the bankroll/real world, doesnt allow for it. and the play i have come across at the low stakes - $1-2, $1-3, $2-5.. i prefer tourneys, but, when tourneys arent panning out, i jump on cash games.. usually i have either a good cash game run, and crappy tourney results, or good tourney results and crappy cash game runs.. i spend more time in one or the other, depending on how things are "running". enjoyable to see hands and stakes against players i would typically face.
This can go either way though. You just happened to be right this time. In low stakes a lot of the times people don't bluff on the river. Especially when they snap move all in it can show a lot of strength. Tbh I think this is a losing call 8/10 times
i agree this was very rare in a low stakes game. You would see this more with a pro in a higher stake game trying to school a rec player . In this case it was just the opposite
Love the positive variance reference. Awesome hand.
homeoXstatic literally just about to say that same thing hahaha
But like even if the river was a blank he still could have checked and the guy woulda gone all in and he coulda snap called which would have been easier.
@@marc6157 he represented the set 8’s. A blank wouldn’t be a reason to shove for that guy. Which casino do you play at?🤑
@@kevinthompson7588 9oo
Was gonna upvote, but you're at 69
Thank you so much!!! Literally 1 hour after watching this video I was in a 1/3nl game and was put in almost the exact same position only the villain had KJdd
And snap raised all in, this video literally made me money within an hour of watching it.
This is probably the one tell I consciously try not to give off. Whenever I am betting the river or jamming at any point, I force myself to take about 15 seconds to pretend I am thinking. Doug polk had a good video about how he called an Isildur snap jam because most of Isildurs value range would at least need a few seconds of thought.
Could always try reverse psychology here. If you have a big hand you can snap jam to make your opponent think you’re bluffing.
@@blakefredrickson6506 that will work on players that are Savvy enough to think through all of that
@@MM-gl1xz I think it's a lot more "obvious"than we might think. It's just such a weird move that even an amateur is going to take a minute to try to figure out what it might mean, and I think they'll be more inclined to call than usual
I try to mix my jams up. sometimes I'll snap others I'll contemplate bluffing or not
@@blakefredrickson6506 not going to work in practice. when the last card comes off, you still need some time process your actual standing in this hand. So even if he had trip 8s, he would have to process in his brain that an 8 came on and that he has a winning hand. ALso, had he had trip Aces or KK, the 8 at the end would still making think for a second or two to figure out if the hand hand completed a better full house.
This works both ways. I have been in villain's position with 8's full or 7's full and snap shoved against more experienced players as a reverse tell. They see it as a bluff and call. It really is opponent dependent as you say. If it's a less experienced player I would call every time on that runout.
Reverse tells work great on people who study poker... You can tell who they are with all that poker lingo they like to use
i doubt that youd snap shove here, you'd still have to consider other possibilities such as AA, and that would take a second or two, so i dont see how you'd snap shove.
@@KronStaro Does Bart snap-check here? As soon as the river rolls out, I can take a second to decide that if my opponent checks, I'm shoving. This wouldn't take me longer than it would take the opponent to decide to check.
The most reliable tell in live poker is when someone moans or breathes in frustration when you bet on the river and then raises you.
acehole “guess I’m going home” raise.... lol
@@bash6404 Playing 1-2 NL, I'm in the 4 and the 2 raises to $20, I reraise to $55 with KK, and it folds around to him. He starts babbling. After about a minute he says "well I guess it's time to go" and shoves for about $300. I'm pretty sure he has aces, but I want to know for sure. So I flip up my kings in front of him and say "You're gonna have to show me the aces." He has had his head down after shoving with a baseball cap on so he doesn't realize I didn't put chips in and call. He grabs his cards, looks at me and flips up the aces. I just nodded. Then he looks at the middle of the table and says where's all the chips? I was pretty happy after that.
Rami Mubasher ive found that to be a mixed bag actually.
Allen Albright from my experience when ppl say it’s time to go . They usually have a strong hand if not the nuts
Evelio Varela I only agree with this if it’s on the river, if it’s pre-flop my experience and I have quite a bit of it is it’s a very mixed bag.
Coming back to this video today. It’s an incredible call on the river. You make it sounds and seem easy but heck of a call.
Bart is by far better than any other in making educational content
100% agree, have seen it.
To add I see many recs betting instantaneously when the bottom card or middle card pairs as a bluff. I see this often.
Funny thing about this video is that in my games the snap shove means they are really strong and they don’t even think about bet size they just try to extract max by shipping it
maybe the lines of the vilan are diferent,i think if they were the agressor they barrel all the and insta idk ...take a look :)
TonyG does that too, snap shoves all in on the river with big hand.
I never snap call, jam, or fold. Give everything at least a little thought, even 5 seconds, and it's one less tell to worry about.
A bigger tell is a rec who goes all in pre-flop. It tells me I'm dealing with a complete idiot.
I only snap call when someone goes all in and I'm the last to act and I know I have the best hand
@@TitusObbayi Dude u can never do that horrible play u r a fool
@@vishalshah3223 what's up with the insults? Why is it a horrible play precisely? If there is no more action the opponent can make, and you have, say quads or top boat, why would you not snap call? What possible advantage are you gaining by wasting time?
Go ahead and snap-fold.
Excellent narrative. Tight, crisp and educational. Thank you.
Love watching you play. I used to be such a nit. I've loosened up a lot playing the 70% type model. Sometimes I worry about playing too tight still until I watch you play. Tight is good.
I wouldn't say tight is good. Better to say "tighter is righter". if someone is button raising any 2 cards and you're playing 20% vpip on the bb, you'll lose too many blinds to ever compete with him long term. If he is raising 100% and you're calling with 70%, now you're got a better edge on him
That's interesting. I would have thought his quick action would indicate the 8 had hit a set for him, possibly a boat. Always learning something new for this rookie.
Probably the most insightful video I've seen on this channel so far. Thanks so much for your content! I'm learning a lot!
As a poker dealer, it's super easy to practice looking for live play tells without any risk of losing money. Never stare at a player as the dealer, but you can still see the tells without crossing the line. LOVE your channel btw.
Sorry for the delay, but what are some of the common tells you have noticed from your dealing experience?
@@reeferpartier100 I started by reading the Mike Caro book on poker tells and as a dealer, it was easy to practice looking for them and identifying them. The other day, I watched a player bet the turn by tossing chips away from his opponent, which is something that the book explains is usually indicative of weakness and sure enough the player folded to a raise.
What he said^
Thanks for providing zero value with this comment
You need to understand that everything you do at the poker table conveys information.
You should do a video if you have more stuff like that. Anything on eating sandwiches all loosey-goosey?
Oh baby !!!!
Morons... it’s from Daniels commercial
insaneguy8 no shit .... reread our comments then rewatch the commercial
Insaneguy8 you are the only moron here
That’s definitely a common tell and it is a polarizing bet when someone insta-shoves. I have seen it just as often the other way however where they have the nuts. I actually see other tells including bet sizing tells that are more reliable and more common than this. (And I play in Austin, TX for what it’s worth)
I almost always snap shove whether it’s a draw, bluff or the nuts
That's all well and good in theory but the fact of the matter is that bad players don't even think about the process like the better ones.
Well what if they had the nuts or close to the nuts and didnt have to think?
This happened to me exactly last night, and I knew what you were going to say before the end of the video.
I feel like almost any rec play snap shoves the river here with zero concern of losing. So...this isn't really all that helpful.
Do you think people who have the nuts also move in fast because they’re excited? Some times it’s hard to tell if it’s a bluff or value bet
Slow action also is a good tell that its a bluff. When someone jams or bets big on the river after taking a considerably long time, and judging by the type the hand he's trying to represent, you can tell that a person is bluffing because there was no need for them to take a longer than usual time to think about their supposedly "big hand". You have to also consider the type of the hand being represented, so it doesn't apply in all situations.
I definitely have had a fair amount of rec players snap shove river on me when checked to. Yes a good amount have been bluffs but quite a few have hit their draw or improved somehow on the river. On this particular board with your hand not blocking any draws and also blocking hands that beat you I do like a call here. Nice analysis as always 👍
Very cool Bart. A lot of my friends at home games snap bet or snap jam the river when they hit what they were chasing so this is tough against very rec players but i def agree that regs and pros think a bit before value betting rivers
this is an interesting caveat. but you are right, most good thinking "pros" or regs or whatever, will take the time before value betting, even if they rivered the nuts. When they snap jam they are doing it as a reactionary thing because they know it is a card they want to jam on, and they think it will look stronger to snap jam than to think about it so they just do it quick hoping it looks strong.
Good players like Bart can sniff that out though. nice hand and good call at the end here.
Jordan Patrick I play micro online and people snap jam the nuts on the river regularly. Of course, I’m playing against either regs, bots or house players so not the same situation. I looked at my losing hands and almost all my loses are river calls and I’m up huge in river bets.
Interesting hand. Nice read. If villain is a solid player I'm reading the hand as you did. But describing him as very much recreational I assumed he had a painted A.
Informative stuff. Thanks
NH Sir.
A few details are missing that I'm curious about. Is the villain drinking? If so how much has he had to drink? Does he know who you are? Also, is there any history between the two of you that aided your decision to call a pot size bet with a hand that can virtually only beat a bluff?
He literally just explained the tell and why snap all-in'ing with AK/AQ/any 8 makes no sense on the river. Also any 8 would probably not just call a raise on the turn due to the diamond draw, we probably would have seen more action before the river with these other hands versus a diamond draw.
Without the live tell, I would’ve folded thinking that he’s only going to raise pre-flop 7X with some kind of ace king type holding and then getting counterfeit on the river. I probably would’ve folded, but having this information you can see it’s pretty obvious and I guess given the equity you have to think of all the hand combinations you’re winning 33% of them as you said great information I actually like these almost better where it’s from your point of view, especially this where something negative happens on the river
Very good video. Great breakdown as to why this tell is polarizing in a hand like this.
Love your play. What about a small blocker bet on the river ?
This video was gold! Thanks Bart!
I was in this exact spot like a year ago and he snapped all in and I called based on the tell and got showed the nuts.
I hate poker.
Let's go back to 2000 poker:
Player: All in
Opponent: Well if you have a better hand than me you win, I call.
Or just have everyone play like Phil Hellmuth. Then poker would be alright.
If i know someone is bluffing and i have a bluff catcher. i will either check or bet like i am nervous basically i give a tell on purpose to draw them in 9 out of ten times it works a treat
This raises my poker IQ - detecting foolhardy behavior when there’s enough complexity you need to think. I know I am improving because now I can at least completely understand your breakdown.
My only question is do most 1/2 or 1/3 players think like that? I never play either game but I can’t stand playing 2/5 (which I used to jump in while waiting for 5/10 or 10/25 games to go). I give people too much credit and I can’t play right (mostly because they aren’t playing the way I expect them to and I can’t put them on a range nor do I fold certain hands for the amount of money bet). Many of those lower game players don’t understand position, kickers, proper bet sizing or calling ranges. Granted Im talking about years ago (when I was playing full time) and to their credit, people play much better and much different now but also because of all of the poker instruction available. I think all games have better players in them than 20 years ago. I just question my understanding of the 1/2 or 1/3 players which are the lowest buy in games in most casinos and them playing a way in which I can put them on hands. They are also almost always recreational players. They may be decent recreational players and I’m not saying anything bad about that but it’s rare to get pros in those games unless it’s a live stream (with most other players being solid) or because they are waiting for a table to open. They also have meet up games now so maybe in that too.
If I ever got Bart's phone number then this "please" at 9:26 would be the ringtone ... I realize this will never happen, but a guy can dream right?
positive variance?
The conclusion to the video was very interesting indeed.
Thanks again,
- DONK2
Great analysis, I have seen a similar scenario before.
Question!
Could you In this situation, use a blocking bet river as $65-95? Would it be a good move to deny equity to AQ , AK and make sure the draws wouldn’t bluff you?
Thanks
Had AQ 2 pair on the flop in 2-5 last night, made it 60$ pre flop both times, lost to trip 5’s on the flop both times, lost it all.
Talk about tilt
Sorry about that. Bad luck to have it happen twice. Variance. You will reverse the scenario next time. Did u play the hands well? Yes. Forget about it and move on. Shit happens in poker. You have to stay strong mentally.
In statistics, variance is the squared difference between the outcome and the expectation... positive and negative really don't apply. You can increase and decrease variance though. I get what you are trying to say though
What about 78 for a boat or 88 for quads. I dont think villain always jams over a check-raise on turn there. 88, although unlikely, may be trapping in hope of a safe river, while 78 is probably does a bit trapping and bluff catching. Maybe the combos of these hands are insignificant when stacked against bluff combos, but villain can def auto-jam with the nuts, no? Agreed, a thinking player would think and try to gauge max value, but bad players can also show up with nuts...
Exactly, the key to this hand is how thin the villain is repping, way more so than the speed which he shoves the river.
The best is taking the same amount of time each time the action is on you. Unless you’re just snap folding garbage of course. Any call or raise you make, keep your time 10-15 seconds or so, making it impossible for your opponent to get a timing tell on you
Don't tank in a 1-3 game for every decision
@@jakegoldrich4847 10 seconds isn’t tanking. If so then make all your decisions close to 5 seconds. Which is pretty short to make correct decisions.
If you're literally spending 10s on every decision, even when you have obvious folds or if the pot is $10, yeah that's absolutely tanking. If everyone spent that amount of time on every hand that's going to be 3+ minutes minimum for most hands which means you're seeing like 15-20 hands an hour which is abysmal even for live
@@jakegoldrich4847 like I said originally, ‘unless snap folding garbage.’ Then take 5-10 seconds, my point is try to keep your time spent fairly similar, otherwise people may pick up on a timing tell. Trying to decide whether to make a call to a big raise might require tanking, but in most situations you should try to keep spending the same amount of time when action is on you.
Super informative vlogs, Sir. Thank you so much.
Amazing read.... had the J9dd done a bit of chip dance and squint his eyes for a bit and then jammed, maybe Hart Banson folds?
As others say, some players at this level are soooo bad they will snap shove with the (effective) nuts. But that seems pretty rare. Bart, you say that people will hesitate a bit in order to think about how to max value. A good player would definitely do that, but I think many players at this level aren't that good. But many players aren't that good but are good enough (which isn't very good at all) to know that when they have the nuts they need to convince the other player they aren't strong, so they will hesitate to try to convince you that they're weak. So this is another reason to call: a not-so-good player snap shoving is a sign they are trying to convince you they are strong, which means they aren't. Does this sound right?
Mark Moyer I actually find a lot of people at this level will bluff jam if they were the preflop aggressor, and ultimately found themself stuck firing 3 bullets and have too much money in the pot to fold it away. The difference is I think people at this level have more trouble diagnosing the situation and have a hard time calling a said bluff jams if they don’t have anything more than top pair.
Very nice video. I have one question, did you ever put him on 8? Or did you erase that because he opened to $20.
Probably the only 8 this rec player would raise to 20 pre flop would be 8-8. Possibly 8-A suited if he's a bit looser.
Surely TCN fee charges makes the game sooo much cheaper. Makes me wish there was a TCH in London! Ty for all your content and analysis. You have done more than most to give top quality free live cash content for 17 years and counting!
When someone is this bad playing a story that makes no sense (e.g. he would have thought about raising the turn with a set or 2 pairs and thought about the river all in), I'd like to take a few more seconds to get a 2nd "confirmation read" on the river. Probably 90% of the time, I would go with my first read and wouldn't be able to get away from that read but the 2nd read/nonread could let you know if he's capable of being deceptive enough to play AK, set, 2 pairs that boated up in the same fashion. He showed weakness on the turn, showed extreme strength on the river all in. What kind of strength did he showed when he said all in or pushed his chips in? What kind of strength did he show while you decide what to do on the river. This is all pretty important.
If the villain is a casual rec player, and he did have AK... once the A came on the turn and he bet and you called, I would think a rec player would reasonably snap-jam any river that wasn't a diamond if he was an aggressive type player. Because like you said the rec players don't value bet enough and tend to jam instead without thinking about the bet.
Love the video thanks for the content
His range is polarized and you are getting 2:1. Seems like a call even without the timing tell. Also, "strong when weak, and weak when strong" with rec players.
Unfortunately good players know this about pacing. I got snap raised all in just the other day when the flush came in and he had the nut flush. Admittedly that situation required less thought from him, but he did use pacing to induce a call from me.
If there is no rake a texas card house how do they make money? Do they charge an entrance fee?
They run their business for free
Do you guys think this is also a tell online? I've made hero calls when people insta bet pot. Just curious to anyone's thoughts on online betting pace
Same exact thing just happened to me in a 1-2 game I was in while waiting for a 2-5 seat. He bet the river super fast in a situation where thought would be required 109% of the time, it smelled wrong and I called with bottom pair. He was pissed and the table was dumbfounded. Coincidentally the previous hand I folded top pair on the river to a relatively small bet, they thought I was nots, but to a thinking player they were standard plays. Sometimes it’s fun to play down and see just how (level 1) 1-2 or 1-3 plays.
Great video subscribed
Interesting. I think people snap jam with the nuts too, so maybe it’s polarizing, and in this case he most likely didn’t have the nuts.
i actually had villain on a KQ/KJdd. i believe i mentioned it on another of ur vids about small stakes quick jams n them being bluff heavy. the villains long pause on the turn smelled like a flush draw, too. i do look 4 quick river jams. if i have trip 8s, i bet $250 75% of the time looking 4 value. Grt hand n call.
Like deer staring at headlights. Bart's got them rec players in his sights.
At my tournament last Friday the guy snap went all in on the river and I had the third nuts I folded because he snapped All In if he would have thought about it for a minute I probably would have called... he had the nut flush
I like your commentary. I tend to think similarly.
could pocket 7s snap move all-in after the river?
Would you have called with KQ?
As usual, I learned something from this video 👍👍
Maybe he has 77, diamonds, 8, u can’t have an 8 here. If he waits 20 secs and bets u fold?
Good tip and well explained.
Great content! 😎😎
Really fascinating video
V would target A and value bet with any decent holding. Snap jam targets nothing. Very few players even know what an over-bet is. Easy call.
really good video - thanks
Bart: "Y'know, I put up hands and shit like that." Funny.
I played a hand last week when the flop came all diamonds and I hit a set of 3’s by I bet 10 into a limped pot and get instantly raised to 25 on A36 of diamonds Alarm went of for a moment because of how fast he raised. Turn black king I check he bets 40 I call river he instantly shoved his last $120. I beat all AK hands and call. He shows 47 of diamonds. This tell didn’t work for me.
I want to try this reversed. Shove instantly when holding the nuts
Completely agree, especially at these stakes
Reaching for high value chips then betting less?
Excellent content.
What if the 10 of clubs comes on the river and he snap jams
I don’t think he would check then, he would Value bet but I’m new here
Great read!
Great content. Thank you
Very good read
You may want to tell your subscribers that UA-cam is unsubscribing people again....GREAT CONTENT.
Wow what a scientist. How do you do it? Unbelievable.
This is a sick hand
If I am in that spot on the river, I put the villain on QQ or KK. It seems like an easy call.
Great hand Bart!
Nice review.
Good content 👍🏼
Why does any ace beat you, because your 2s were counterfeited? Wouldn't you have AA887, so unless they have a kicker higher than 7, its a split pot?
What if a 10 comes on the river? Maybe I missed it. What did you think he had?
Can someone summarize this tell pattern, please?
Little late here but basically the way he played the turn and river didn’t match his pacing on the river unless he bricked
Absolutely gotta agree here
I always get confused about regulars and recreational players, when people say "a rec" or is it "a reg". Can somebody tell me. English is not my first language.
Amano Jyaku : “a reg” means “regular player”, not necessarily a pro, but plays a lot. Probably a solid player. “A rec “ means a recreational player. Not necessarily bad, but is playing for fun, and is thus more likely to take chances.
@@halecarter7041 i knew this, but i meant when they say "a rec" or "a reg" i dont hear the difference between the two. So what is when they use that term, a regular or recreational.
Anyway thanks for the reply✌🏾
Amano Jyaku “reC” with a C is recreational and “reG” with a G is regular rec and reg
@@venge2206 duh i mean when they SAY it! I dont HEAR! the difference. I can read. But still thanks for the reply.
The Sherbinski of poker!
nice to see more "avg Joe" level play.. by that i mean lower stakes. i would love to try higher stakes, but the bankroll/real world, doesnt allow for it. and the play i have come across at the low stakes - $1-2, $1-3, $2-5.. i prefer tourneys, but, when tourneys arent panning out, i jump on cash games.. usually i have either a good cash game run, and crappy tourney results, or good tourney results and crappy cash game runs.. i spend more time in one or the other, depending on how things are "running". enjoyable to see hands and stakes against players i would typically face.
Thx for sharing this Bart, very helpful.
This can go either way though. You just happened to be right this time. In low stakes a lot of the times people don't bluff on the river. Especially when they snap move all in it can show a lot of strength. Tbh I think this is a losing call 8/10 times
i agree this was very rare in a low stakes game. You would see this more with a pro in a higher stake game trying to school a rec player . In this case it was just the opposite
@Jay P how many people in 1/2 or 1/3 actually bluff? It's very rare
@Jay P so you are telling me that you would make that call?
@Jay P you should play high stakes then. You must read people like dnegs
He blocks fd and sd?? Lol what? Besides it would be terrible for him if he actually did hold those blockers
Snap move isn’t an 8 ?
Shit like that!! Hahaha. Nice one Bart
This means: I have to turn rec, get a winning hand and then snap shove the river! And a pro would called me!! 🤦♀️😂