Thank you. Very good explanation and helped a lot. So whenever the researcher says he or she is using a regression model to analysis, he is performing a meta-analysis or can a regression model be used for a regular primary study? What is the difference between a regression model approach and a matching method?
A regression model can be used in a primary study. The author of the systematic review can use the results from the primary study in the meta-analysis of systematic review.
I wanna know about Meta-Review...I think it is the review of systematic reviews or meta-analyses....I wanna know what components does its research proposal and thesis consist of?
Does it mean systematic reviews (without meta-analysis) make a conclusion without statistics? I'm a little confused.Thanks very much for your reply. :) :)
Thank you for the video, it really helps to start understanding the difference between lit review and meta-analysis. A question though, I wonder the differences (if exist) between those two methods in terms of the contributions to a field. How do they differ? And what's the first indicator of a good quality meta-analysis paper? Thank you
Good question. Both make a contribution to the field, as best as they can. A systematic review with meta-analysis ranks higher in terms of levels of evidence, than just a systematic review. Review the contents of a systematic review with meta-analysis against the PRISMA checklist.
Tomorrow is my final exam you are a life savior
I hope your exam went well!
Shukraan ❤.... Well explained 😇
Makes a lot of sense. Thank you 😊
Thank you so much . Your explanation is very clear
Well explained
Thank you
Thank you. Very good explanation and helped a lot. So whenever the researcher says he or she is using a regression model to analysis, he is performing a meta-analysis or can a regression model be used for a regular primary study? What is the difference between a regression model approach and a matching method?
A regression model can be used in a primary study. The author of the systematic review can use the results from the primary study in the meta-analysis of systematic review.
I'm not sure what is referred to by "matching method" though. Keep looking for answers. Success will come.
Well explained
Thank you very much for this clear explanation!
This is very helpful
What is the difference between review paper, systematic review and meta analysis pl? Is the review article also known as a review paper?
very helpful response, thank you
Just made my day
Love u ❤
Thank you for this breakdown.
Thank You so much!!!
very beneficial
Many thanks
If you are citing mortality analysis of one specific animal lets say snow leopard what type of study is it ?
I wanna know about Meta-Review...I think it is the review of systematic reviews or meta-analyses....I wanna know what components does its research proposal and thesis consist of?
The JBI Reviewers Manual shows one how to do a systematic review jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
Thanks you .
Can we include unpublished studies in meta analysis?
You can include any data as long as you are transparent as to what you are including :-)
makes sense! Thanks
Thanks a lot ❤❤
Makes alot of sense
Thanks a lot. Could you advise some programs for meta-analysis ?
Revman is a good one. There are also a few others mentioned here: toptipbio.com/free-meta-analysis-software/ Enjoy the research journey 😀
Does it mean systematic reviews (without meta-analysis) make a conclusion without statistics? I'm a little confused.Thanks very much for your reply. :) :)
Yes, indeed :-)
Thankyou for making this concept so easy
Thanks! A question.. which are the regress methods used in a systematic reviews?
That is a great question. I wish I had a good answer for you but I'll need some more info to make sure I answer the question properly :-)
Understandable 🎉
Thanku so much
Thank you for the video, it really helps to start understanding the difference between lit review and meta-analysis. A question though, I wonder the differences (if exist) between those two methods in terms of the contributions to a field. How do they differ? And what's the first indicator of a good quality meta-analysis paper? Thank you
Good question. Both make a contribution to the field, as best as they can. A systematic review with meta-analysis ranks higher in terms of levels of evidence, than just a systematic review. Review the contents of a systematic review with meta-analysis against the PRISMA checklist.
A
thanks you saved me
I need some help in systematic review
Systematic reviews can be tricky😊
This playlist may help ua-cam.com/play/PLo0N0fsKrssVsBUdLIhoAhgxsWlapuJbW.html
Is a systematic review the same as a literature review?
Great question. Here's a video that explains the difference ua-cam.com/video/Nwp9tkhpLCo/v-deo.html
South African accent recognisable anywhere in the world ❤
Best recognised by fellow South Africans ❤️
it makes sense
meta ... summary of summaries (papers)
makes sn
es