so basically this video said, open source projects i github are programmers portofolio collection by Microsoft (this way you don't have to pay anyone for their time you just spend some dollars on servers) , so Microsoft don't have to find talented programmers all they need to do is utilize AI to find specific programmers with specific portfolio in github. when they found them, they can just contact the person offer the job, which might leaving the projects unmaintained anymore. sorry I'm dyslexic so my mind doesn't work as normal people does. anyone read this and had time, mind to speak your mind?
we must encourage devs to use the GPLv3 license. I think a lot of devs default to MIT which is easy to deal with but definitely gives a lot of freedom to people who can abuse it
Instead of saying wpengine did not contribute back to the community, those who contribute lots in the open source project should offer professional service such plugin, saas offering based on the open source and SLA based support services which corporate needs. I think it is more productive than create a war with those who make money selling their service through a repackaging their services but did not contribute back to community. I believe corporate will have higher weightage for those who is one of the main contributors to the open source project with competitive offerings under professional services
Including AI in development, students' interest in open-source(creating, contributing, testing), community and individual interests, and licenses to protect and prevent exploitation would help open-source grow for everyone's well-being.
Proposal: Impliment a charter city government with global legislation jurisdiction on open source and public domain resources. Effectually, a digital country ran out of a self-governing municipality populated by international citizens and non for profit organizations, but hosting for taxable income purposes all global-scale corporate headquarters specializing in the digital economy and infrastructure? "Internet City".
Yeah, I only got about 3 minutes into it before I gave up. AI footage, AI narrator, and it felt like an AI script. Makes me wonder if the story about the jammed printer is even true, or just another hallucination.
Instead of licencing and patent. The usa government should invest and finance immediate manufacturing of profitable invention make it faster and rescue the country
Make no fucking mistake, at the end, OS was used and will be used for the greater good of corporative world. It makes sense cause as seen through History, power seeks for reusability over retaliation. It's more efficient. And new private initiatives will get harder and harder to implement under their control, while theirs will remain dominant and unstoppable like never before. All thanks to the community :)
Nothing in this world is free and to think otherwise is foolish. I'd like to add that without collaboration there is no progression and isolation leads to stagnation, complacency and ultimately dependency.
tbh, to me this sounds like open-source just fell out of a coconut tree... what are key open-source organisations and what's their agenda? where is economic context? where are the governments and legislation?
There is none, much like the anonymous hacking group its completely decentralized and anarchistic. Anyone can contribute to open source at will, and if you attempt to privatize it, be prepared to be ousted by the millions of FOSS movement supporters.
Microsoft, google, github, the Linux foundation, IBM, goddamit even Bitcoin is built on open source technology. All of these Companies I listed have one or more open source projects that are contributing to the world in one way or another, let alone the economy of mulitple countries. Every server you use, uses linux. Goddamit even your littly-bittly password your little brain thought of is stored & hashed under sha256 or sha512 which are an open source project. But here you are, a little ignorant individual in your little room, somwhere in world trying to challenge the 'economic context' of open source, smh 🤦♀ Use your free time to educate yourself.
The idea is that not everything should be behind a paywall. It's kind of the same idea behind the "right to repair" movement. Having to rely on proprietary holders and their services can bring undo hardship to people where these services are not offered in the first place. An example would if your car broke down because the software in it failed and the only way to fix it is to drive 100 miles to the nearest authorized servicing station... yea you're SOL.
I think most reasons are somewhat connected to altruism, but there are a few cases where you yourself can benefit from it. Let's say you run into a problem like Richard Stallman and want to modify the firmware of your printer because there is a certain feature you need. If you decide to reverse engineer the firmware, build your feature on top of it and then open source it/release it for others to use (given that reverse engineering is not forbidden in the manufacturers software license), you can gain at least two benefits I can think of right now: 1. Other people might think of new ways to use your feature and send you patches to do so. That way you yourself could use that feature. Or there was a bug in your firmware and if others contribute they can fix that bug before you ever run into the issue yourself. 2. You can build up your own portfolio and show off your skills if you open source your work on the firmware. That way future employers might be more inclined to employ you or even invite you into the interview. Even as an enterprise you can gain benefit by open sourcing your work. Because you can get contributions from people you didn't even pay to do that. But often that is more enterprises exploiting open source for their own benefit rather than contributing in the sense of open source. IMO the open source movement is about working together for a greater benefit for all of us and reducing the amount of code that has to be written more than once because the person that solved the problem first did not share their work.
@@janvollmer5210 I agree with the value of open-source ideals - that sharing code for others to improve, patch, or enhance can indeed benefit everyone involved. The Linux kernel, for example, is a powerful testament to the collective contributions of many, helping make it highly stable and adaptable across diverse systems. However, when we compare open-source to commercial software like macOS or Windows, it’s worth asking why the former isn’t always perceived as evolving as rapidly or richly as some proprietary operating systems. These commercial OSs, particularly Windows, are designed with a wide range of users and use cases in mind, with dedicated resources and strategic planning to cater to industries, enterprises, and general users alike. Their flexibility and programmability make them approachable for various applications while benefiting from a more unified, centralized direction in development. Considering the scenario with a "proprietary" product like a printer, where a specific software feature might be missing. The software is a critical part of the hardware package sold to customers, protected by IP and patent laws. These laws ensure that an inventor or creator is safeguarded against easy replication and market competition from copycats. The hardware, after all, can be duplicated relatively easily, and without IP protection on software or firmware, an innovator’s unique ideas and extensive effort could be easily replicated, potentially undermining their hard work and livelihood. Innovation, in this sense, is often driven by the ability to safeguard original creations. If every invention were immediately open for anyone to replicate without consequence, some inventors might hesitate to dedicate years of work only to see it duplicated without protection or compensation. While some may feel open-sourcing has immense collaborative value, others might view it as risking their personal or business sustainability. Ultimately, the open-source movement and IP protection each have roles. Open source fosters community-driven improvements, while IP protection can encourage individuals and companies to invest in creating novel, groundbreaking technologies. Balancing these ideals allows both innovation and collaboration to thrive in meaningful ways. --
Here is the idea 1. You have software to help you achieve a task 2. There is something you feel you can do to improve the software for your use 3. you improve it 4. others like your improvement and use it too You don't aim to exploit your consumers to make a profit, you just felt like making things better for yourself and you did and let others benefit from it too compare that to 1. UA-cam removes dislike button, deal with it 2. Windows will make it impossible to delete edge, go mess around with your registry for hours 3. Pay to unlock dark theme 4. Wait how much does Office cost again... It is a subscription now 5. Why does my machine become a potato every 5 years 6. No I don't want to restart my machine now for an update . . .
For completely selfish reasons. By open sourcing, you get others to use and contribute. It's like hiring the most passionate employees, but you get paid for it.
Thank you to PostHog for sponsoring this video 😊, Check them out at codesource.io/PostHog
This is such a great production bro... keep it up!
Glad you enjoyed
so basically this video said, open source projects i github are programmers portofolio collection by Microsoft (this way you don't have to pay anyone for their time you just spend some dollars on servers) , so Microsoft don't have to find talented programmers all they need to do is utilize AI to find specific programmers with specific portfolio in github. when they found them, they can just contact the person offer the job, which might leaving the projects unmaintained anymore.
sorry I'm dyslexic so my mind doesn't work as normal people does.
anyone read this and had time, mind to speak your mind?
rms and linus is a legend hero
right now he's banning Russian programmers...
All i got was don't do shit for free because people are ungrateful.
we must encourage devs to use the GPLv3 license. I think a lot of devs default to MIT which is easy to deal with but definitely gives a lot of freedom to people who can abuse it
Then don't.
Great video, at 4:20 there is a typo in License
Quality content, thanks for making these videos
Instead of saying wpengine did not contribute back to the community, those who contribute lots in the open source project should offer professional service such plugin, saas offering based on the open source and SLA based support services which corporate needs. I think it is more productive than create a war with those who make money selling their service through a repackaging their services but did not contribute back to community. I believe corporate will have higher weightage for those who is one of the main contributors to the open source project with competitive offerings under professional services
Agree
Great vídeo.I Hope that channel grows
Including AI in development, students' interest in open-source(creating, contributing, testing), community and individual interests, and licenses to protect and prevent exploitation would help open-source grow for everyone's well-being.
Keep sharing bruh! i love ur vids
Appreciate it!!
Is Open Source Really Open source now days, every good or big project is now almost Maintained by big corporations 😂
time is money after all
Proposal: Impliment a charter city government with global legislation jurisdiction on open source and public domain resources. Effectually, a digital country ran out of a self-governing municipality populated by international citizens and non for profit organizations, but hosting for taxable income purposes all global-scale corporate headquarters specializing in the digital economy and infrastructure? "Internet City".
Communism mentioned 😂
I stop watching videos with AI stock footage in them
It won’t be long before you won’t be watching any videos then!
Yeah, I only got about 3 minutes into it before I gave up. AI footage, AI narrator, and it felt like an AI script. Makes me wonder if the story about the jammed printer is even true, or just another hallucination.
@@mmlvxthis is not an ai narrator. there is nothing wrong with ai stock footage vs normal stock footage.
@@mmlvx wow 🫠
future only open source 🎉
Interesting
Instead of licencing and patent. The usa government should invest and finance immediate manufacturing of profitable invention make it faster and rescue the country
When Linus leaves Linux there will be a great splintering.
Great video 🎉
Make no fucking mistake, at the end, OS was used and will be used for the greater good of corporative world. It makes sense cause as seen through History, power seeks for reusability over retaliation. It's more efficient. And new private initiatives will get harder and harder to implement under their control, while theirs will remain dominant and unstoppable like never before. All thanks to the community :)
Whoa! Imagine my shock, you need money and not everything is free!? Who could have seen that coming!? 😂
Nothing in this world is free and to think otherwise is foolish.
I'd like to add that without collaboration there is no progression and isolation leads to stagnation, complacency and ultimately dependency.
❤ thanks for the video 😊
You're welcome 😊
Sehr gut
"Locked the source code", that's the dumbest shi I've heard in years as a dev.
Says the 'dumber dev' who doesn’t understand what locked source code actually is.
@ lmao, wish you luck
🖤🤗
sounds like communism
capitalism, communism, Marxism, etc... none are human first, they are design for power first
Open Source isn’t an economic philosophy
@Jetway-Yefan sadly almost everything in this world in this era is connected to economy...
You mean socialism
tbh, to me this sounds like open-source just fell out of a coconut tree... what are key open-source organisations and what's their agenda? where is economic context? where are the governments and legislation?
There is none, much like the anonymous hacking group its completely decentralized and anarchistic. Anyone can contribute to open source at will, and if you attempt to privatize it, be prepared to be ousted by the millions of FOSS movement supporters.
Microsoft, google, github, the Linux foundation, IBM, goddamit even Bitcoin is built on open source technology. All of these Companies I listed have one or more open source projects that are contributing to the world in one way or another, let alone the economy of mulitple countries.
Every server you use, uses linux.
Goddamit even your littly-bittly password your little brain thought of is stored & hashed under sha256 or sha512 which are an open source project.
But here you are, a little ignorant individual in your little room, somwhere in world trying to challenge the 'economic context' of open source, smh 🤦♀
Use your free time to educate yourself.
The idea is that not everything should be behind a paywall. It's kind of the same idea behind the "right to repair" movement. Having to rely on proprietary holders and their services can bring undo hardship to people where these services are not offered in the first place.
An example would if your car broke down because the software in it failed and the only way to fix it is to drive 100 miles to the nearest authorized servicing station... yea you're SOL.
🎉🎉❤
1st comment, i know it’s gonna be a piece of art without even seeing it 👏
Thank you 😊
Why would you want to open source your app and let anyone steal your work??
I think most reasons are somewhat connected to altruism, but there are a few cases where you yourself can benefit from it.
Let's say you run into a problem like Richard Stallman and want to modify the firmware of your printer because there is a certain feature you need.
If you decide to reverse engineer the firmware, build your feature on top of it and then open source it/release it for others to use (given that reverse engineering is not forbidden in the manufacturers software license), you can gain at least two benefits I can think of right now:
1. Other people might think of new ways to use your feature and send you patches to do so. That way you yourself could use that feature. Or there was a bug in your firmware and if others contribute they can fix that bug before you ever run into the issue yourself.
2. You can build up your own portfolio and show off your skills if you open source your work on the firmware. That way future employers might be more inclined to employ you or even invite you into the interview.
Even as an enterprise you can gain benefit by open sourcing your work. Because you can get contributions from people you didn't even pay to do that. But often that is more enterprises exploiting open source for their own benefit rather than contributing in the sense of open source.
IMO the open source movement is about working together for a greater benefit for all of us and reducing the amount of code that has to be written more than once because the person that solved the problem first did not share their work.
Shhh
@@janvollmer5210
I agree with the value of open-source ideals - that sharing code for others to improve, patch, or enhance can indeed benefit everyone involved. The Linux kernel, for example, is a powerful testament to the collective contributions of many, helping make it highly stable and adaptable across diverse systems.
However, when we compare open-source to commercial software like macOS or Windows, it’s worth asking why the former isn’t always perceived as evolving as rapidly or richly as some proprietary operating systems. These commercial OSs, particularly Windows, are designed with a wide range of users and use cases in mind, with dedicated resources and strategic planning to cater to industries, enterprises, and general users alike. Their flexibility and programmability make them approachable for various applications while benefiting from a more unified, centralized direction in development.
Considering the scenario with a "proprietary" product like a printer, where a specific software feature might be missing. The software is a critical part of the hardware package sold to customers, protected by IP and patent laws. These laws ensure that an inventor or creator is safeguarded against easy replication and market competition from copycats. The hardware, after all, can be duplicated relatively easily, and without IP protection on software or firmware, an innovator’s unique ideas and extensive effort could be easily replicated, potentially undermining their hard work and livelihood.
Innovation, in this sense, is often driven by the ability to safeguard original creations. If every invention were immediately open for anyone to replicate without consequence, some inventors might hesitate to dedicate years of work only to see it duplicated without protection or compensation. While some may feel open-sourcing has immense collaborative value, others might view it as risking their personal or business sustainability.
Ultimately, the open-source movement and IP protection each have roles. Open source fosters community-driven improvements, while IP protection can encourage individuals and companies to invest in creating novel, groundbreaking technologies. Balancing these ideals allows both innovation and collaboration to thrive in meaningful ways.
--
Here is the idea
1. You have software to help you achieve a task
2. There is something you feel you can do to improve the software for your use
3. you improve it
4. others like your improvement and use it too
You don't aim to exploit your consumers to make a profit, you just felt like making things better for yourself and you did and let others benefit from it too
compare that to
1. UA-cam removes dislike button, deal with it
2. Windows will make it impossible to delete edge, go mess around with your registry for hours
3. Pay to unlock dark theme
4. Wait how much does Office cost again... It is a subscription now
5. Why does my machine become a potato every 5 years
6. No I don't want to restart my machine now for an update
.
.
.
For completely selfish reasons. By open sourcing, you get others to use and contribute. It's like hiring the most passionate employees, but you get paid for it.