Why The Tecnam P2010 is Better Than The Cessna 172?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @warshrike666
    @warshrike666 Рік тому

    I havn't flown a Cessna yet but i do have 5 hours in a 2005 p92 echo super Tecnam and i love it. Still got a long way to go for my licence but i could not have picked a better plane imo to start with. :)

  • @anthonygibson3133
    @anthonygibson3133 Рік тому +5

    You can just say "One Seventy Two" the "Hundred" part isn't necessary....

    • @harblz57
      @harblz57 Рік тому +1

      It's because it's computer-generated, not a human reader. A good reason to downvote the video and block the channel This kind of crap shouldn't be rewarded.

  • @edsonroadmoto
    @edsonroadmoto Рік тому

    Sound clips of it starting and taking off be nice 👀

  • @MrPerry61
    @MrPerry61 13 днів тому

    looking at the stats the P2010 is even better than the P2006T

  • @LM-47
    @LM-47 5 місяців тому +2

    I want real airplane reviews. Not stock photos with some AI narrator.

  • @stew1981
    @stew1981 Рік тому +2

    I'm assuming this is AI generated info or poor copy and paste to AI reading. This is half describing an addon airplane for flight sim software. Click spots, and PBR materials etc is simulation talk. Mixed with info on the real airplane.

    • @zaelu
      @zaelu Рік тому

      Absolutely ridiculous garbage voice over :D :D

  • @Spymell
    @Spymell 7 місяців тому

    C172 is the King!

  • @kevinphillips9408
    @kevinphillips9408 Рік тому +1

    Very poor script and the person reading is obviously has no knowledge of aviation. You need to do a lot better

  • @scotabot7826
    @scotabot7826 Рік тому

    "Better than the 172", somebody is dreaming, Big Time!!!!! That's funny!

    • @gotchagoing4905
      @gotchagoing4905 Рік тому

      Do you mean the Cessna one hundred and seventy two ;}>

    • @riyazmomin9845
      @riyazmomin9845 Рік тому

      Jn

    • @warshrike666
      @warshrike666 Рік тому

      Tho i havn't flown a 172 yet i disagree that Tecnam is dreaming. How old is the Cessna design??