@@QuiescentPilot Actually, that'd work in German or any other language where the etymological relative of practice does not only refer to the process of improving at something (as in English), but also to the application of theoretical knowledge.
@@gorkemgungor9998 Why? I don't even understand the point of his comment. It's rather annoying to be honest. Every time I see it I am surprised. I don't get your rationale for commenting such a thing
Thank you very much for the analysis! I really love this game showing how the estimation of position can change to the opposite because of decisions that seem to be just slightly inaccurate. I saw this game in the Russian book called something like "Chess game textbook", game 15, and it has some more findings. First, Capablanca saw the winning 53 ... Qh1 move. He supposes that Janowski was too focused to give a check on 1st line and didn't think that the exact field is important. Second, Janowski had an opportunity to force a draw by 54... Kc1+, but didn't use it. Third, Kasparov commented that 58 ... Qh4!? or 58 ... Qe3!? also could lead to draw assuming accurate game. All this says that before the 59th move nobody except Capablanca had an idea that white could win. It makes the game very inspiring.
I just watched LessMessYes`s "Best of Agadmator - Funny Chess Moments, PART 1". Some quotes from Agadmator: "Engines are tricky bastards!" 🤣🤣🤣 "My internet service Provider failed to provide me with the service of internet" 🤣🤣🤣 "What a weasel" 🤣🤣🤣 This stuff is pure gold!!!
These kind of games are my favourite by far!! You have an insane attack as black but Capablanca plays the only moves to defend properly and at the same time turn the tables and win as white. Beatiful game! I'm curious, did Capablanca never mention this Qh1 move in one of his books? I'm sure he saw it at least after the game. I'd like to see what he thought of the position
These two also played in the New York 1924 tournament, which had all the giants of the time (Both Laskers, Capablanca, Alekhine, Tarrasch, Reti, Bogolubov, and others including Janowski who came in last. Lots of fighting games. Would love to see your analysis, especially of Reti's big win over Capablanca. Lasker had lost the world championship to Capablanca a few years before but showed that he still had it by winning the tournament.
Wow, probably one of the greatest chess games I have ever seen before. Capablanca's defense throughout this game was incredible! Also, David Janowski had a great attacking performance. Overall both players had an amazing game. So many valuable chess lessons to be learned from this game indeed!
Thank you very much for the exciting game. David Janowski created such a fierce attack that even Capablanca had to be worried. It is a shame he missed the winning move after such inspired attacking and bravery. I wonder if they analyzed the game after and realized the near miss. Somehow modern games (and draws) seem dull in comparison to active games as this. This game and all the Agadmator videos remind that I know nothing about how to play chess well, and just how great the old masters were.Thank you for your excellent contend and vast knowledge.
This was the first Capablanca game I saw. It taught me that one blink loses the game. Capablanca was lazy and knew no theory. But somehow he managed to let his prodigious talent win where no one else could.
@@Robin0Blackett Yeah, it makes no sense to pronounce a non-English word like that. Most languages pronounce "j" in the very same way, including - ironically - Agad's native Serbian.
This is the third game of Capablanka which I have seen loaded by you. Actually I had already seen this game. All of them were very interesting. Thanks.
So in this game, Janowski is one of the greatest players of all time because he did not draw? LOL, greatest players 'WIN' games. Not just 'NOT PLAY FOR A DRAW'! There's a big difference. It's better to draw by perpetual than lose the game. Atleast people will remember that he had upper hand even though he drew unlike a loss.@@ProFac992
AMAZINGLY instructive videos. Delving deeply into the middle-game like this. My chess win rate has improved leaps and bounds after i ditched chess books and just watch 6 youtube videos a day following my opening repertoire. Hope you have a great party!!
23:42 The position is indeed winning for black but not that way. :) the black king will actually be on time to protect the c4 pawn. That's the way to go.
Age, perhaps. This game reminds me a little of Janowski-Reshevsky in 1922, when Janowski delayed what seemed to be a crushing sacrifice until it was less effective, then slowly sank and eventually lost.
Very nice. I would be glad to see more so aggressive games. That's pretty exciting to see a player using all his arsenal. Also green squares are cool :)
9:49 - Black Ng4 not only comes with check but also wins the white queen.. Black plays 1. Ng4+ Kh3 2.Ne3+ (discover check from bishop) wins white queen..
In the line at 23:43, it is true that black would be up 2 pawns, but the white King would be able to grab the a5 and c4 pawns while the black King goes for the pawn in b7...I believe white could still draw the game!!!
anyways....Stockfish engine gives a devastating advantage to black in this position (-15.99), so definitely Black wins......It is important to notice that black King goes to defend the pawn on c4 instead of going for b7... The winning sequence is this: 1...Kf7 2.Kb2 Ke6 3.Kc3 Kd5 4.Kd2 g5 5.Ke3 g4 6.Ng3 c3 7.a4 Ke5 8.Ke2 c2 9.Kd2 Kf4 10.Ne2+ Kf3 11.Nc1 h1=Q 12.Kxc2 Kg3 13.Kd2 Qxb7 14.Nd3 Qc6 15.Ne1
I also saw that, but after analysing a little I think that the white king can only grab the c4 pawn, the black king has a way to protect the a5 pawn if he moves correctly. Still a tricky end game for sure.
13:49 what about b7? After trade of pawns, with two pawns against one, not all on one side, black has the theoretical minimum to play for the win, but the heavy material makes it very unclear. 13:46 ...Qg2!
Antonio, you've helped a lot of people to improve their chess. I'm just wondering whether this project has improved your chess as well. I can't see how it wouldn't, but I'd like to know what you think about it.
at 8:45 black's white bishop should have come for H3, pinned pawn on G2. If white bishop defending then black queen F2 check. Exchange both white bishops. Then black queen H1 check forces white king away from pawn to win with check,Wherever king moves, black queen and horse with open king, checkmate
Hi agadmator, dont know if it has already been commented but donostia is basically the basque name for San Sebastian. In the north of the spain lives the basque people which talk their own language (Which its origin is still unknown)
Hey Antonio, i really enjoy all your videos. It's kind of addicting sometimes. I know covering good tournament games and series on great chess legends is really fun to watch and provides vast knowledge. #suggestion Although i think you should start a series where you teach an opening line every week. That would really help a lot of viewers improve on their theory knowledge. Please cover at least one opening every month (if not every week). Thank you for such great content. Your videos give life to chess.
1911: I can force a draw but I'll keep attacking until the end
2019: 1. e4 e5, both players agreed to a draw
In the spirit of Mikhail Tal
I keep hearing that everytime i drink my beer or any alcohol beverage. ..haunting isnt it
For Misha
I read it exaclty the way agad said it
Thanks to lessmessyes this statement is now burnt hard in my memory😂
Damn 6 hours late!
Today I've pulled a Capablanca during my exam. I had two books to study: Theory and Exercises. I've managed to be successful without opening Theory.
João Franco shame that the books aren’t called theory and practice. They would be the same in theory, but not in practice.
@@QuiescentPilot
Nice
@@QuiescentPilot
Actually, that'd work in German or any other language where the etymological relative of practice does not only refer to the process of improving at something (as in English), but also to the application of theoretical knowledge.
@@QuiescentPilot I see you reciting Ben Finegold, you're probably not but he said it in one of his lectures😂
Yakub Irkilmez ayyyyy you got it :]
We may need more David Janowski videos.
Agreed!
@@mindlesslyscrolling378 agreed! even a saga would be nice!
We NEED THEEM!! its confirmed!!
Vast knowledge 0:00
First move 1:39
Find next move 21:39
Lol skiperino
bruhhh im dead
kripp would be proud
agadmator should pay u m8 :D or at least pin ur comment every single video
@@gorkemgungor9998 Why? I don't even understand the point of his comment. It's rather annoying to be honest. Every time I see it I am surprised. I don't get your rationale for commenting such a thing
0:00-26:18 whole movie
Dude that was a wild game
Insane game
A wild chess game appears😂
Really loving the Capablanca saga! Thank you again!
Doesn’t play for draw, Janowski is now my new favorite player
He was definitely a fighter.
Watched many videos... Suddenly find my self in chess tournament and than at chess private lessons! This is true influencing.
Thank You Agad!
And in this position, Agadmator sacrifices his social life for a very nice video upload. Though hard to find, it is the winning move
Lesson from this game:
Too many bishop moves in the opening d-files the church.
Your a queen e-1
What a STUNNING game. I'd heard Janowski was a complainer, would make excuses for loses, etc. But here, well he gave us a real attacking game.
Thank you very much for the analysis! I really love this game showing how the estimation of position can change to the opposite because of decisions that seem to be just slightly inaccurate.
I saw this game in the Russian book called something like "Chess game textbook", game 15, and it has some more findings.
First, Capablanca saw the winning 53 ... Qh1 move. He supposes that Janowski was too focused to give a check on 1st line and didn't think that the exact field is important.
Second, Janowski had an opportunity to force a draw by 54... Kc1+, but didn't use it.
Third, Kasparov commented that 58 ... Qh4!? or 58 ... Qe3!? also could lead to draw assuming accurate game.
All this says that before the 59th move nobody except Capablanca had an idea that white could win. It makes the game very inspiring.
This is the first time me watching Janowski and already a fan.
This is just tactical madness on the board. Please make more videos of Janowski
I just watched LessMessYes`s "Best of Agadmator - Funny Chess Moments, PART 1". Some quotes from Agadmator:
"Engines are tricky bastards!" 🤣🤣🤣
"My internet service Provider failed to provide me with the service of internet" 🤣🤣🤣
"What a weasel" 🤣🤣🤣
This stuff is pure gold!!!
dont 4get "!n the spirit of Tal" !!
I admire your strong attitude towards channel independent and operated. ..because this is the Alpha Zero of chess channels
These kind of games are my favourite by far!! You have an insane attack as black but Capablanca plays the only moves to defend properly and at the same time turn the tables and win as white. Beatiful game!
I'm curious, did Capablanca never mention this Qh1 move in one of his books? I'm sure he saw it at least after the game. I'd like to see what he thought of the position
Poor Janowski, this game wasn't the only defeat in his life. In the end he lost most of his money and died poor from tuborculosis.
Unfortunately, that happened to many people in that era.
yeah even Homer Simpson agrees
Did he gamble on himself winning
Indeed, it was sad. Janowski was as fine a player as there was then. His games are still a great delight.
Can you make a David Janovski series?
He seems like a really interesting player. I would love to see more of him.
I can't believe I came in 2 years late. Anyway, I love this saga. Jose Raul was a phenomenal player and his games are really interesting
Agadmator's enthusiasm for this game, especially at the what-if stage, is really infectious. Capablanca was a fantastic player.
These two also played in the New York 1924 tournament, which had all the giants of the time (Both Laskers, Capablanca, Alekhine, Tarrasch, Reti, Bogolubov, and others including Janowski who came in last. Lots of fighting games. Would love to see your analysis, especially of Reti's big win over Capablanca. Lasker had lost the world championship to Capablanca a few years before but showed that he still had it by winning the tournament.
Wow, probably one of the greatest chess games I have ever seen before. Capablanca's defense throughout this game was incredible! Also, David Janowski had a great attacking performance. Overall both players had an amazing game. So many valuable chess lessons to be learned from this game indeed!
Wow, what a fantastic game! Definitely something I'll want to show my friends at the bar and library.
Thank you very much for the exciting game. David Janowski created such a fierce attack that even Capablanca had to be worried. It is a shame he missed the winning move after such inspired attacking and bravery. I wonder if they analyzed the game after and realized the near miss. Somehow modern games (and draws) seem dull in comparison to active games as this. This game and all the Agadmator videos remind that I know nothing about how to play chess well, and just how great the old masters were.Thank you for your excellent contend and vast knowledge.
Excellent video! I really enjoy all your videos and look forward to them everyday.
What a game! Janowski was really mighty and brave player!
Ayy, I am genuinely happy to see your uploads, watching this one while eating dinner.
This was the first Capablanca game I saw. It taught me that one blink loses the game. Capablanca was lazy and knew no theory. But somehow he managed to let his prodigious talent win where no one else could.
Damn, I was rooting for janowski. That position was very nice!
More David Janowski vids sounds good! Maybe more videos of him against Lasker and other famous opponents :D #suggestion
#suggestion !
I love this game. Not for the faint of heart!
Nice game. even though I'm a little sleepy because here in southeast Asia it's already midnight
It's eleven o'clock in indonesia
david was a gentleman to make such a masterpiece for us. he looks really like a elegant
Man what a fight, what a fight !
I like the cut of this Janowski's jib.
I hope you're better now! Thanks for all the videos even though you were / are sick ;)
0:33 you said it correctly the first time, ''Janowski'' is pronounced softly.
Thanks
@@agadmator glad to help! :)
I was cringing every time he said it with ʤ sound, it was so annoying!
@@Robin0Blackett Yeah, it makes no sense to pronounce a non-English word like that. Most languages pronounce "j" in the very same way, including - ironically - Agad's native Serbian.
@@amjan That's exactly why I was so annoyed by this, Agad is a fellow Slav, so he should've know better. :D
This is the third game of Capablanka which I have seen loaded by you. Actually I had already seen this game. All of them were very interesting. Thanks.
I saw two times until 1:30..the first was for the dog! I love that pet!
This may be my favorite chess game
Is it only me who thinks that Janowski seemed to have played better in this game?
He actually did until the late game where Capablanca took over. Should've probably settled with a draw lmao...
If you play for a draw it's a crime against chess. Know that
lol is that why most of the chess games between grandmasters end in a draw? @@parkerjeans5777
Kaizo That is the reason why they are “only” grandmasters and not greatest players of all time. Since all time greats did not play for a draw.
So in this game, Janowski is one of the greatest players of all time because he did not draw? LOL, greatest players 'WIN' games. Not just 'NOT PLAY FOR A DRAW'! There's a big difference. It's better to draw by perpetual than lose the game. Atleast people will remember that he had upper hand even though he drew unlike a loss.@@ProFac992
AMAZINGLY instructive videos. Delving deeply into the middle-game like this. My chess win rate has improved leaps and bounds after i ditched chess books and just watch 6 youtube videos a day following my opening repertoire. Hope you have a great party!!
23:42 The position is indeed winning for black but not that way. :) the black king will actually be on time to protect the c4 pawn. That's the way to go.
one of the most impressive games.
Wow! What a game! Honestly my favorite so far from the Saga!
Loved David Janowski. need more games from janowski
i felt so bad when Janowski looses his h-pawn
Age, perhaps. This game reminds me a little of Janowski-Reshevsky in 1922, when Janowski delayed what seemed to be a crushing sacrifice until it was less effective, then slowly sank and eventually lost.
Incredible game and comeback by Capa
I almost always find the first move when you say to find it, very rarely do I see the continuation. My vast knowledge is improving... slowly!
I like Janowski. Wouldnt mind seeing more from him.
At 8:55, is white still doomed with bishop f1? It would also negate the bishop sacrifice black made on H2.
One of the most exciting attacking games I've ever seen!
This Janowski guy, pretty cool player. I’d be interested to know what he knew of Capa before this game. Considering how David played.
Very nice. I would be glad to see more so aggressive games. That's pretty exciting to see a player using all his arsenal. Also green squares are cool :)
What an awesome game, both were good in this but Cappablanca just went nuts in the endgame to come back and win. Thank you for posting.
Znaci najbolji si! Pozdrav iz Srbije!!!!
Awesome video and an amazing game! Thank you for the A0 book alert - will order today.
I honestly jumped off my seat when Janowski didn’t play Qh1 when I first saw it
One hell of a ride...
1st block the pawn, then win the win the pawn, and then you win the game. I gotta try this some time lol... Love your videos man, keep it up.
What a masterpiece by Capablanca!
Dude... that last part... Dedication!
Your videos are so good i don't even play chess but can't stop watching them
Such an inspiration, i`m fighting to keep above 1000 in rating, and i don`t feel your videos are to advance for me.
Yes
I never find anything negative to say about this channel until a video is not posted then I criticize. #Greatest chess channel ever.
One of my favorite games! Drama by both white and black, with relentless pursuit for a win by both players. Simply excellent.
Oh, man... I really thought Janowski had him for a second.
What a wonderful game by both players
Going for the Capablanca saga was a great choice, astonishing games
As a Pole I'm kind of sad right now 😟 buy this was a great game, thanks for this analysis 😊 greetings
4:04 now im ready. Bring me Carlsen!
9:49 - Black Ng4 not only comes with check but also wins the white queen..
Black plays 1. Ng4+ Kh3 2.Ne3+ (discover check from bishop) wins white queen..
We should all learn chess from capablanca saga it is very helpful.
In the line at 23:43, it is true that black would be up 2 pawns, but the white King would be able to grab the a5 and c4 pawns while the black King goes for the pawn in b7...I believe white could still draw the game!!!
anyways....Stockfish engine gives a devastating advantage to black in this position (-15.99), so definitely Black wins......It is important to notice that black King goes to defend the pawn on c4 instead of going for b7...
The winning sequence is this:
1...Kf7 2.Kb2 Ke6 3.Kc3 Kd5 4.Kd2 g5 5.Ke3 g4 6.Ng3 c3 7.a4 Ke5 8.Ke2 c2 9.Kd2 Kf4 10.Ne2+ Kf3 11.Nc1 h1=Q 12.Kxc2 Kg3 13.Kd2 Qxb7 14.Nd3 Qc6 15.Ne1
I also saw that, but after analysing a little I think that the white king can only grab the c4 pawn, the black king has a way to protect the a5 pawn if he moves correctly. Still a tricky end game for sure.
This why i love a classic game, so complicated and never seen moves
A beautiful game! Well played both sides😎
I've seen
all your chess videos but brother, This was the Best game EVERRRR seen by me on this channel, lot's of support and good luck for future❤️
You make chess more intressting, nice vid Agad!
13:49 what about b7? After trade of pawns, with two pawns against one, not all on one side, black has the theoretical minimum to play for the win, but the heavy material makes it very unclear.
13:46 ...Qg2!
Antonio, you've helped a lot of people to improve their chess. I'm just wondering whether this project has improved your chess as well. I can't see how it wouldn't, but I'd like to know what you think about it.
at 8:45 black's white bishop should have come for H3, pinned pawn on G2. If white bishop defending then black queen F2 check. Exchange both white bishops. Then black queen H1 check forces white king away from pawn to win with check,Wherever king moves, black queen and horse with open king, checkmate
Hi agadmator, dont know if it has already been commented but donostia is basically the basque name for San Sebastian. In the north of the spain lives the basque people which talk their own language (Which its origin is still unknown)
Capablanca was a genius.
Love this channel
"Here, Medo, have a bone. I do hope you enjoy it!"
Hey Antonio, i really enjoy all your videos.
It's kind of addicting sometimes. I know covering good tournament games and series on great chess legends is really fun to watch and provides vast knowledge. #suggestion Although i think you should start a series where you teach an opening line every week. That would really help a lot of viewers improve on their theory knowledge. Please cover at least one opening every month (if not every week). Thank you for such great content. Your videos give life to chess.
thank you beautiful game
I think this is the best chess game I've ever seen
The Chess Machine, long before there were engines, LOL!
I want more of this guy. Please
A brilliancy, this game is very beautiful
I think this is my favorite game and analysis so far.
At 14:40 ( 1 step before itself) White can play Bishop x e5 as the black knight is pinned for its unprotected queen
What a game! Insane how it seemed all over for the white pieces and instead it went on to win it!
i really like games like this.as capablanca checks his breathing, so do I.
Love these historical games.
13:22 cant u go e5? It attacks the bishop with the pawn and the queen attacks the knight so maybe u win back a piece here?