I can imagine the amount of hard work you had put in to make these awesome lectures!! And that hard work should be appreciated!! So on that note Thank You for this awesome Linear Programming playlist. Everything about the lectures is good(pace,content, explaination etc.)
Thank you! You just explain me what I haven't learn from my professor or other you tube videos! Thank you for the BEST 15 min!!!!! I JUST GOT IT - Linear Programming rocks TY!
I love your videos. I don't usually leave comments but your explanations are really nice, really thorough. I've personally watched this very video over 4 or 5 times just to refresh what I've learned. Thank you so much
Good explanation! But I have an issue with how you applied the Bland's rule and how I read it on Wikipedia (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bland%27s_rule). The Wikipedia version states that when choosing the column for pivoting (in the Z function), we should pick the "entering variable" with the lowest index. Sounds like in tableau 1, we should've picked -1( or X1) instead of -2( or X2). In other words we should not go by the most negative variable. Am I right or I am missing something? I would be happy if you helped get a good grasp on that one.
There is no tie for selecting the entering variable in Table 1. Entering Variable is chosen based on minimum Z value for the maximization problem. There is a tie for leaving variable in Table 2 as both current B.Vs correspond to same minimum ratio.
thank you for such informative video, I would like to know if I used a software, am going to get the same results in catching the specail cases,or the soft wares are not accurate sometimes.
I can imagine the amount of hard work you had put in to make these awesome lectures!!
And that hard work should be appreciated!!
So on that note Thank You for this awesome Linear Programming playlist. Everything about the lectures is good(pace,content, explaination etc.)
You are the most logical one amongst the ones I have seen till now. Appreciated.!!!!!!!!
Thank you! You just explain me what I haven't learn from my professor or other you tube videos! Thank you for the BEST 15 min!!!!! I JUST GOT IT - Linear Programming rocks TY!
You are the best! I couldn’t understand this concept for weeks, thanks to you I do now ❤
I love your videos. I don't usually leave comments but your explanations are really nice, really thorough. I've personally watched this very video over 4 or 5 times just to refresh what I've learned. Thank you so much
Much much much better explained than my IEOR 162 course @ UC Berkeley!!! Thank you A LOT!
Oh great, finally I understand the degeneracy.. Great work!! Many thanks.
Nice work, I come to understand the concept very clearly!!
Waooo😍 Madam U Explain It Very Well Manner I Get To Much Information and Got my Concept clear 🎉🎊❤️
really great teaching many new things i have learnt from here
That was excellent..i have studied from your videos.
I am very grateful for this video thank you
You're a lifesaver.
your videos are excellent, keep sharing them thanks a lot
Thank you (Sepas) Shokoufeh jan
thank you so much!
keep doing your videos are awesome
Good explanation! But I have an issue with how you applied the Bland's rule and how I read it on Wikipedia (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bland%27s_rule). The Wikipedia version states that when choosing the column for pivoting (in the Z function), we should pick the "entering variable" with the lowest index. Sounds like in tableau 1, we should've picked -1( or X1) instead of -2( or X2). In other words we should not go by the most negative variable. Am I right or I am missing something? I would be happy if you helped get a good grasp on that one.
that was my confusion
There is no tie for selecting the entering variable in Table 1. Entering Variable is chosen based on minimum Z value for the maximization problem. There is a tie for leaving variable in Table 2 as both current B.Vs correspond to same minimum ratio.
Very well explain and demonstrated! Thank you!
thank you for such informative video, I would like to know if I used a software, am going to get the same results in catching the specail cases,or the soft wares are not accurate sometimes.
you should get the same result for the most part if your problem is linear.
Thank you .your lecture was my perfect search i got.
What if we have the same ratio but with r and s what do we do
very clear explaination
thank you! very clear and help me a lot!
Thank you so much, this help me a lot
Thank you so much
Thank you a lot, this has been very helpful:)
Thank you! Helped for my exam.
You explained very well !!!!! Beauty with brains :)
can we solve such problems by any other methods?
What happens when an artificial variable is in tie?
really helpful.. thanks a lot
which software do you use ?
Thanks, lifesaver
Can you please explain the types of degeneracies with examples
I am not sure about your questions. But there is only one degeneracy condition which is explained in this video with an example.
Thanks to be done
Glad im here because the prof was tooo lazy to expain… oh btw, TAs were the same, too.
you're amazing
Thanks
all Z values would be all zero and Cj-Zj value would be 1, 2 how ur Z value come to be -1 and -2???
If you are referring to the first table, it's because we standardize Z equation by bringing all the variables to the left had side i.e. Z-x1-2x2=0
it's bland rules the substitute show "blonde" lol
can you please become my prof. ! 😭❤️thank you very much !!