Normal Distribution 12 • Hypothesis Testing on the Sample Mean • Stats2 Ex3G • 🎲

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 41

  • @MojoyinolaAjayi
    @MojoyinolaAjayi Рік тому +13

    your videos are amazing! I'm so glad I found your channel

  • @cameronnisbet2467
    @cameronnisbet2467 Рік тому +23

    Revision gang, where u at!

    • @revision7685
      @revision7685 Рік тому +1

      HAHAHAA LAST MIN REVISION GANG FR🤣🤣

  • @safiyak8459
    @safiyak8459 11 місяців тому +2

    Hi sir, I'm really confused about why you're not rejecting the null hypothesis when your value is greater than the sL. eg at 24:46 . Isn't that what you're supposed to do

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  11 місяців тому +2

      We accept the null hypothesis if the probability is higher than the significance level - this is because it is likely enough to have happened with the null hypothesis being true!

  • @harishankarshikkulal8599
    @harishankarshikkulal8599 3 роки тому +14

    hahaha the last example was funny

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  3 роки тому +2

      It’s a real job, all based on stats! 😂

    • @cineacle
      @cineacle 6 місяців тому

      @@BicenMaths for one/two-tailed normal distribution hypothesis q's with the sample mean, do we have to always make sure we take the P(sample mean less than or greater than a value of the mean given)?
      e.g, say the sample mean is y = 5.52 and the normal distribution is Y - N (5.7, 0,08^2/30), where HO: mean = 5.7, and H1: mean less than 5.7 with sig level of 2.5%?
      so in this example, would you take P(X bar as less than 5.52)?

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  6 місяців тому +1

      @cineacle yes that’s right - if the mean you observed is smaller than the mean you are testing in H0, you test less than the observed value, and if it is bigger than the mean you are testing you test greater than the observed value.

    • @cineacle
      @cineacle 6 місяців тому

      @@BicenMathsthat makes sense, thank you sir!

  • @user-fr5tt3fn2l
    @user-fr5tt3fn2l 9 місяців тому

    For the second question at 21:12 of the video. Would I need to do 1- P(X bar ≤ 124) when using the other calculator . I got 0.04778 without doing 1- the probability . Can you explain this to me please ? Thank you

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  8 місяців тому

      It’s the same value, just slightly rounded!

  • @benyeo9663
    @benyeo9663 6 місяців тому +2

    Hi Mr Bicen,
    at 20 minutes while doing the hypothesis tests, do you not need to do the continuity correction as it is a binomial approximation? So instead of P(X>124), P(X>124.5).
    Also I appreciate your videos, very helpful.

    • @benyeo9663
      @benyeo9663 6 місяців тому

      Just not really sure when and where we are supposed to use continuity corrections. Is it not used when hypothesis testing with binomial approximation as we are dealing with means?
      And otherwise if with normal data and approximating we should?

    • @pinkmangooooo
      @pinkmangooooo 6 місяців тому

      @@benyeo9663me too I never know when to do the continuity correction

    • @rahulmaheshwari9504
      @rahulmaheshwari9504 6 місяців тому

      You would need to use a continuity correction when converting a binomial distribution to a normal one, but the here we're just testing a sample mean, which is already normally distributed (hence you're given the standard deviation and mean), so you'd just test the critical value they give you as is. hope this helps!

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  6 місяців тому +2

      This is correct! We ONLY do continuity correction when using the normal distribution for a binomial distribution (i.e. we have just done the np, np(1-p) process) - never any other time.

    • @benyeo9663
      @benyeo9663 6 місяців тому

      @@BicenMaths Okay that makes more sense.
      Thank you.

  • @Weenietheman
    @Weenietheman Рік тому +1

    I really struggle to understand the direction of the > or < in a two tailed test because I was taught for a one tail it always matches the alternative hypothesis its good if im unsure but it means idk how to figure to the direction of a two tail

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  Рік тому +2

      Have a look at the observed value from the test statistic (in this case, it is the mean from the sample). If the mean from the sample is bigger than the H0 assumed mean, then you would investigate the probability that it is higher than the observed mean - and if the mean from the sample is lower, investigate the probability that it is lower than the observed mean. This is because these probabilities are naturally going to be smaller than the other way around.

    • @Weenietheman
      @Weenietheman Рік тому

      @@BicenMaths tysm sir really appreciate you and your vids

  • @SajedG
    @SajedG Рік тому +2

    Thank you!

  • @INFINITY_meZza
    @INFINITY_meZza 9 місяців тому

    Im struggling to understand for all types of hypothesis testing how you are supposed to know what the extreme probability would be for example how do you. Know you should find prob X 124

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  9 місяців тому

      If your alternative hypothesis is that X > a, then when you find the test statistic, you'll find X >= the value observed. If it's X < b, then you'll find X

  • @mshrq11
    @mshrq11 Рік тому +1

    Why did you do y

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  Рік тому +2

      The 59.1 is the observation we made of the mean of the sample - so we want to test if this observation is ‘extreme’ to mean we reject H0. If you did it with

  • @AceOfHearts001
    @AceOfHearts001 Рік тому

    Hi Mr Bycen, I cant seem to get to the correct answer... any pointers?
    Machine makes metal sheets width X cm. Supervisor wants to use a sample to estimate the mean of X
    Determine how large the sample needs to be so that he can be 95% sure that the sample mean width will differ from the population mean width by less than 1 cm. Assume that sd=3.2cm.
    Any pointers highly appreciated.

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  Рік тому +1

      This is a tough question that is too hard to explain on here! I think it's from the textbook though, have you used Solution Bank for it? Very unusual and not something I anticipate them asking.

    • @AceOfHearts001
      @AceOfHearts001 Рік тому

      @@BicenMaths hey thanks so much, yeh its long explenation so wasnt explecting one. Just wanted to see if you could think of a pitfall. I mean I used mu plus 1 on the Z formula..mu cancels..inv Normal 0.95 for Z value.
      Dont get the right answer and cant see where Im going wrong.
      Its from the official pearson workbook for year 2 Stats and Mech. I dont think they have a solution bank for that?
      Ive also booked my self for your session tmr. I think i wont be able to be there till the end so hopefully watch the last quarter when you send link to the whole thing, is that fairly quick?
      Thanks a lot for all your help.

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  Рік тому +1

      @@AceOfHearts001 So, here's my advice - have a look at Q24 from Applied Year 2 textbook (not workbook) as it is asking a similar thing to do with how large the sample needs to be. Then you can review it using the Solution Bank and that should help you answer the one from the workbook! www.physicsandmathstutor.com/pdf-pages/?pdf=https%3A%2F%2Factiveteach-prod.resource.pearson-intl.com%2Fr00%2Fr0071%2Fr007110%2Fr00711049%2Fcurrent%2Falevelsb_sm2_ex3mix.pdf
      As for Saturday's session, there's no problem if you need to leave earlier - I'll send out the recording as soon as it processed by Zoom and you can use it whenever convenient for you! See you Saturday!

    • @AceOfHearts001
      @AceOfHearts001 Рік тому

      @@BicenMaths Thats a really good suggestion! I will do just that.Thank you. Looking forward to tmrs session!.

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  Рік тому +1

      @@AceOfHearts001 Great! Just in case you haven't realised, the session is on Saturday morning, not tomorrow! Hope you can still make it?

  • @bharadwajeddanapudi8507
    @bharadwajeddanapudi8507 Рік тому +1

    Thanks sir

  • @bfex1443
    @bfex1443 Рік тому

    How do you know it is a 2 tailed test

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  Рік тому +1

      Because the alternative hypothesis is that the mean is not the given value - meaning it could be higher or lower than this value. There are 2 options - higher, or lower. This makes it 2 tailed. If the alternative hypothesis was that it was higher than a given value, for example, it'd be 1 tailed.

  • @adeshewaadebayo7480
    @adeshewaadebayo7480 8 місяців тому

    Hi sir could we do the hypothesis testing via critical regions and inverse normal ? I've done it that way and come to the same conclusions as you do in the video.

    • @BicenMaths
      @BicenMaths  8 місяців тому

      Absolutely! Unless it states which way to do it, you can choose whichever method you prefer.