I know you take your viewers' tolerance of puns for granite, but I assure you, I have no apatite for your wordplay! It isn't very gneiss to do this to people! And I'm sure there are plenty of others who share my sediments on the matter.
@@2cbadvideos That will depend on the "theology" of the religion but most religions would be different from magic, sense a magic trick or curse is not a mirachle. In christian theology simon the magician is a somewhat clear example of the difference of divine power from magic. Magic is the ancient man of seen the sciences, astronomy comes from astrology, alchemy and chemestry, geomancy and geology and so on, alan more has some nice ideas about it. IMHO the diference is magic comes from dark (secret) arts and science in principle is suposed to be democratic. What I mean by that is the only way you learn a spell is by the study of the secret words, that aint suposed to be learned by everyone around you. The witch dr is not going to explain to you his arts.
Some of these stories of atheist or at least non-believing warriors who converted to Christianity solely for the sake of fighting for a king are fascinating. They are good tells of a pattern in which many people embraced Christianity not because of some great realization of deep theological "truths" or because of the "rationality" of the religion, but because they went with the flow.
@Freki Bodgaedir So fucking brave dude announcing it for the world to see, you're so special I want to shake your hand and give you keys to the city of Nobody Gives a Shit
People did that all of the time back then and now. Pledge allegiance to the God of some city when doing service for the administration. Not much difference than the oaths people take to the various municipalities. Although, it's not very biblical is kinda more of a pagan behavior and that's probably especially why they really didn't mind it initially. It was just another God to throw in
“Wanderers… some heathen, some godless, but all the same depending on each other, leaning into their might, their luck, their strength.” Sounds like a statement pretty applicable to many of us on this pagan path together. This gave me chills in a good way. Skal brothers and sisters!
The swords 'bite' used to be quite common in poetic speak. It is a reference to the blade of the weapon, which was considered to be its bite. That suggests to me that it was saying the blade of the weapon finally started working to take the person down. It's bite getting through is just a prettier way to say the same thing.
A similar expression is still used in modern Norwegian; both in a literal sense of e.g. a tool intended to cut some material, and in a figurative sense of something affecting a person's physical or mental well-being ("This weather does not bite me, I'm used to it.")
Ketill seems like my kind of dude: Adventurous Viking who loves his little girl enough to let her make her own choices AND will violence people in support of those choices.
There might have even been Buddhist vikings. When I saw Buddhism represented in the TV show Vikings I was a bit skeptic of the historical accuracy (even though I'm aware they've traveled to far-off places). When I Googled it I found an article discussing how a little Buddha figurine dating to the Viking age had been found in irrc Sweden. It could've traveled there indirectly through trade, without any information on its meaning, but if intercontinental travel was common enough for it to end up there, I wouldn't be surprised if a few vikings knew about the religion/philosophy.
That would be a very interesting topic I think for 2 reasons: 1. Buddhism lends itself well to being syncretic. Some argue it's not even a religion and more of a philosophy so it would be interesting to see how it meshes with these European polytheistic beliefs. 2. In Buddhist lore the Buddha is higher than any god because the Buddha is the Enlightened One. The Buddha has achieved enlightenment and in Buddhist scriptures you can even find the Buddha teaching gods on how to achieve enlightenment, would be an interesting perspective. Also the Buddha no longer exists because becoming a Buddha means you are able to break the cycle of Samsara and not reincarnate upon death. Mahayana Buddhism believes that anyone can become a Buddha and a Bodhisattva is one who has declared intention to become a Buddha and is thus on the Buddha-path. Bodhisattvas exist to help liberate all beings from the cycle of Samsara by helping them to achieve enlightenment while they are on the path for their own, and all beings would include the gods.
These godless ones sound like Klingons as described in the wedding of Worf and Jadzia: Our gods were too much trouble, so we killed them and now trust to our own skill.
The godless ones believe in their own strength, there may be gods above and gods below but the only gods capable of changing your life are the ones who live within yourself.
@The Matrix Hardly as weak as those putting their faith in some fantasy god or gods so they can pass the buck so to speak and not take responsibility for themselves.
@@samaelcercunnin5227 allah is a weak god actually , if your religion gets destroyed but somehow you manage to sustain your existence and return back to the mainstream I'd call that strength , allah however doesn't thrive on the devotion of his followers but rather on their fears , he's an evil god..... basically the god of Abrahamic faiths is an evil god which shouldn't come off as a surprise to anyone , just look what is currently happening in the world all in the name of that god but using different religions
After almost 40 years of watching my mother's religion tear itself apart, I can only conclude that a society that cannot tolerate atheists eventually comes to be intolerant of itself. These guys are great examples of "live and let live" that I wish xtianity hadn't countermanded for its own ends so we could disabuse more people of the notion that monotheism is the "only safe option". My partner struggles with the Catholicism his addict mother "raised" him with, the Spiritual experiences of his own UPG, and my steadfastness on my own Pagan path. I'm tempted to hand him the Cowboy Havamal, not to convert him, but at least to give him the kind of "Be the best whatever you already are," wisdom and comfort I found first in Buddhism before wandering north and west, so to speak.
I believe that religion in the West is "tearing itself apart" because it is not our true faith, and that Christianity actually exists to cut us from divinity. The Havamal is our book. Hail the Gods! Hail the folk! Hail the AFA!
Yes you are right an Sword cut can be discribed with bite as a synonym, in German we still do so, for extrem sharp Blades or for someone who is not afraid of stronger or more eneies ore someone who swimms agains the stream and so on, we use some times the synonym he has bite or he/it is bity
Interesting! I guess the English equivalent here would be "edge" (for swords) and "edgy" (for the swim-against-the-stream people)? Two slightly different meanings wrapped up in one word.
some of these stories kind of remind me of an old family story I've been told. We are Melungeons but the family story is is we had an issue over land with a family, waited until the family attended church, then locked the doors and killed everyone a few hundred years ago. We were told to avoid the spiders as they gave knowledge and there is a west African spider god of wisdom (something melungeons are at least partially genetically) so it might be associated with that god in the belief in wisdom. they at least ignored the power over the church and chose to do what benefitted them.
Negation of claims doesn't necessarily mean denial of an entity. In philosophical atheism, this means a denial (or lack) of the belief in a deity or deities. Think if someone, named Joshua, claimed he was god and you said you don't accept it (i.e. the Negation). You're not refusing his existence rather denying his claim. I don't accept the claims of a divine but that is independent of there actually being an divine entity.
Amazing video!! And I am a weeb so the sword biting reminded me of Kisame Hoshigaki 's sword in Naruto. And the end part reminds me of what atheists and pagans should be doing and that is helping each other regardless if it is in a war or not but in general life . And again amazing video!!
Monotheists kinda gross me out. I get the appeal of polytheism and animism. Used to practice it. It was comforting. I became an atheist because no matter who I have prayed to in the last 30 years, my deepest heart's desire never came true. I was never healed from my chronic illness. So I gave up. I have made progress by trusting evidence based approaches. But nothing good ever happened concerning my prayers when I trusted gods. At first I thought they were ignoring me on purpose, but I prayed to around a hundred gods, and none of them helped. They don't all get along in the mythology, so why would they all agree not to help me? It would be out of character for them to agree on just this one thing. I couldn't think of a reason that all of them would intentionally ignore my prayers. So I became irreligious. For a few months I was just angry they were ignoring me. Then I became an apatheist. Basically, I realized that the gods were either evil, impotent, or imaginary and I didn't particularly care which was the case. However, I saw some of what the damage was from monotheism, and how polytheism could be just as deadly if the trend towards organization continues, so I became a proper atheist.
@@indoorsandout3022 Thank you for that breakdown of your spiritual journey. But, I think that an individual regardless of they are religious or not has the ability to be deadly or dangerous if radicalized. Rather it be monotheists or polytheists or atheists or anything in between them or outside of those labels. Anyone can be deadly and dangerous if they have a catalyst to be so or upbringing in the home or other factors. Again thank you for replying and breaking down your spiritual journey and your journey to atheism :D
@@DrDino123 My pleasure. While I have direct experience of monotheistic extremism (having been in a cult and having lost friends in the wars in the middle east), I am less wary of paganism because it doesn't seem to be flirting with doomsday prophecy or genocide. I'm not really worried about individual radical elements. The trend towards organization is worrisome because if a large group radicalizes around a leader, that would be a major problem.
Makes me realise how closely we connect Vikings to Norse mythology, even though Vikings are mostly - if not only - called Viking because of the act of viking. Doesn't surprise me one bit if there were atheists among them, though I'd struggle to imagine which of their blood would believe in other mythos than the Norse.
Then Ketill got in a heated exchange with Paut and Paut called Ketill "svartalf". Ketill replied that this was hypocritical of Paut as they were both svartalfar.
Having recently become interested in Norse paganism due to the influence of a good friend, I have found other of your videos very informative, but as an atheist myself this one in particular attracted my attention. I believe you make the valid point that the definition of “atheist” is somewhat in the eye of the beholder, and because of that I do not believe, however, that someone’s saying, “I don’t sacrifice to Odin,” demonstrates by itself that he was an atheist. It allows for the possibility that he believed Odin existed, but he didn’t need or expect anything he might have gotten in return from worship and sacrifices (and possibly due to prior disappointing personal experience). A somewhat clearer example of my point would be, “I don’t care what the wood spirits think; I’m not afraid of them.” I.e., “I believe the spirits exist, but do not fear or need to propitiate them.” You do admit that someone could have been considered to be “godless” without necessarily believing that the gods didn’t exist, but I’m one of those who believes that that does not make them atheists in any meaningful sense. As another point it’s true that by the usual definition it’s possible to be an atheist without rejecting belief in all supernatural entities. I suspect that most atheists who have given the subject significant thought and analysis do so, but is it absolutely necessary? I’ve known self-described atheists who do accept the possibility of such entities, but what’s the difference between a god and any other supernatural being that has god-like powers? Believers conceive of countless gods that aren’t omnipotent or have all the other characteristics of the Christian God. At perhaps the bottom tier of the hierarchy might be the souls of the dead. If, however, they can communicate with the living, then they can do things we living people cannot. A step up might be a ghost that’s capable of traveling through solid walls, or moving objects around in the house, presumably through the power of only its will. No living being can do such a thing, so what’s the difference between a ghost and a minor god that the atheist says doesn’t exist? And that question extends to people who claim to be monotheists: both Christians and Muslims believe in the angels and demons that are indistinguishable from the minor gods of pagan pantheons (as far as I can tell). If you’re still reading this, I am curious what you may think about “secular pagans,” or those who cannot believe in supernatural beings, but wish to formally and avowedly adhere to the religion’s tenets and values as a belief system. That is, people who are somewhat like those who state they follow Jesus’ teachings, and even consider themselves to be Christians, but don’t believe he was God. Thanks again for your insights and explanations.
I would posit that whether to believe in and follow the philosophy alone or to accept the gods and the philosophy is of no real consequence to the the gods, I am sure that they have other matters to attend to rather than worrying about us individually. I would, and do, extend my hand to those with core values similar to my own. Personally, I believe in the gods, a much more important question is do they believe in me. Good fellowship is hard to find, the details of someone's beliefs trouble me not. So drive on my secular friends, it is good to have you all in the boat. Besides I practice poorly, I sacrifice infrequently.
Once again the Norse culture is deeper and far more complex than what you see in most shows or is covered in schools in the UK . Thank you for a great video
Bro your intro music is beyond epic! Thanks for all the great info you def have a completely different perspective and vibe than anyone else and that certainly keeps me watching !
In my mind, a blade can bite, and im confused at how this is not intuitive. I was always taught that a blade would "bite you" to accept you as it's master. This is meant to say that it is not truly yours until an accidental drawing of blood. Anything from a tiny prick to horrible accident would meet the requirements. The other side of the practice is this: if you carried a blade which has not been blooded and if it bites someone else while using it with your blessing, then honor demands the person bitten immediately become the blade's master. I get its superstitious, but this has always seemed perfectly intuitive.
Heckin' hard to overstate how glad I am to have found this channel, gods be willing I hope to cross paths with you and the others from the Heathen High Five (if the stars align); in the states or here in Sweden. Big thanks for the work you put into these videos, and for being one of the clear and concise voices of good within heathenry!
correction: apunism is not "to lack puns." The "a-" in apunism should be understood as an active negation in normative punosophy. **snort** **guffaw** **choke**
Man I really relate to these Godless. I’ve never liked the terms agnostic or atheist, and I love learning about religion (especially from you pegans), I’m just not a believer in any particular God. But the phrase “makes offerings to no Gods.” It kinda suits me. I’m sorta a wanderer after being “cast out” of Mormonism anyway. Great video. Gave me a lot to think about.
Yep. Even though I’m a believer in science I do believe in the existence of the various gods and goddesses. I mean there are cases of mythology fitting nicely with scientific discoveries. One such example is a myth from Tibet regarding the origin of humanity, which the story specifies descend from primates and we know that humanity descend from primates thanks to archaeological discoveries and scientific research. So you have to wonder where the Tibetans figured that humanity and primates are relatives.
@@mirandagoldstine8548 I mean we do physically resemble them, so i personally wouldn’t be surprised that that’s a religious story. Not trying to downplay them
@@sabinske8692 True. But the fact that the people of Tibet figured out a connection between humanity and primates a long time ago is mind boggling. Apparently this story was set to paper in the 7th century, long before Charles Darwin proposed his theory of evolution, much less born. Also Hindu mythology mentions that the Earth is very, very, very old. They are off by a couple of billion years but the fact that Indian mythology states the earth is really old is amazing. We know the universe is 13.7 billion years old and the earth 4.5 billion based on astrophysics so the fact that Hinduism argues the universe is much older is amazing to think about. I’ll try to find other myths that mesh up with scientific discoveries.
@@mirandagoldstine8548yeah, it is mind boggling that a group of religious people thought of that before an actual scientist. Religion is a wonder for sure, sometimes I think of it as a parable the Buddha once said, a bunch a blind men touching a elephant in different places, all touching the same elephant but each one feeling something different.
Gods damn it Ocean your puns will be the death of me. I also love tjis perspective that some atheism of the past might be a rejection of tradition deity whorship :) brings things into perspective
The expression of a sword “biting” may genuinely be an artistic way of saying what a blade chipped in battle, or a duel for that matter, does. It no longer cuts, it rips thru flesh more akin to a bite rather than a cut.
Excellent video on a rarely discussed topic! I especially liked the part about the wandering bands who may have composed the Havamal. It gives me a new perspective and a new way of reading the purpose of the text's practical advice!
So I found you from the God of War Thor video and while I'm not a member of your religion I really enjoy the content and I find a lot of similarities between my own world view and the way you describe the godless ones so thanks for showing me a piece of history and mythology I had no idea existed
13:20 They were neither Christian nor Heathen, but followed no gods. They and their band of men believed in their own power and success. Meaning their strenght and their luck. And that in their experience this had proved well enough. Very inspiring!
My father, 100% Norwegian, after 2 wars on ships, running boats from Seattle to Nome fir a few years, then spent 53 years in a career cutting with knives. I thank him for his knowledge in edged instruments. Im accused of making knives too sharp...no such thing. Anyway...when he tested a recently sharpened blade, whether knife, axe, etc, he ALWAYS said, " look ir feel for the bite" . A simple example: take a known sharp knife and a known dull knife of relative weight. Hold the handle with thumb and index finger allowing the weight of the knife to rest on a thumbnail. Pull back. The sharp one should "bite" and drag a bit as a result. Bite is considered the entrance of a blade into it's target.
I fall within the realm of the godless ones (modern atheists). However, I have maintained a strong desire to connect with a deity. So far, nothing has really pulled through as evidential enough to claim me. One would technically call me an Agnostic-Atheist since I am open to the possibility but I think a deity would need to make their presence very obvious in order to sway me.
@@levilamont8005 I must not see gods as you do. So yes, I deny the existence of deities. Nothing in the way of a God has actually made itself evident to me.
No existence of a god necessary. I found my spirituality to be healthier and more logical when I became atheist. I'd say I'm more spiritual as an atheist than I ever was when I was religious
'Bite' when it comes to a sword is a pretty common term for cutting into something. I'm very confident that Ketil's sword was a regular sword with no teeth! What is the actual Norse/Icelandic term used for the godless ones?
Well, it's logical to use "bite" to describe a blade cutting flesh. In older texts anyway... Other words I often see use are devour, eat, ravage, and swallow, all denoting an "eating" habit. Whence this came from is unknown but as old as the first inscriptions of combat.
I follow the philosophy of the old heathen ways. That said, do I believe there is a one eyed god, armed with a magical spear and riding an eight legged horse across the heavens? No. However, do I find wisdom in the old stories? Yes, and easily.
I use a similar logic (to "denial of many gods") when talking to friends who aren't sure what to think when they find out I'm an atheist; usually they're Christian, so I ask "do you believe in Zeus? Thor? Shiva?" then when they (of course) say "no", I say, "well, see, you're an atheist too, I'm just an atheist about one more god than you".
@@OceanKeltoi I don't really get this argument, which I've heard many times. An atheist is not someone who doesn't believe in a specific god, it's someone without a god belief. I mean, If you believe in Thor, Odin, Ymir but don't believe in Yahweh, you are not an atheist of Yahweh, you are a theist who doesn't believe in Yahweh. As you say, it doesn't work on a polytheist, but it does not work on a christian too.
@@OceanKeltoi Yeah, it's not as common a point to make, but then, I've rarely had polytheists show any concern about my atheism. The hostility and negative conotations just don't come from ya'll so much in the modern world (where I live); the pagans/polytheists and other similar groups tend to shrug and be like "that's cool, you do you".
@@ColpoRosso We're not being literal. It's just a comparison of the state of disbelief (with some facetious language). It gives them something to relate to; Christians (at least, most in my experience) don't disbelieve in Zeus because they hate him, or because they "don't want to be accountable to him" (common claims by Christians in the US about atheists), they just have never been convinced he exists (or that he's a god), so they don't believe. Same as me.
The occasional appearance of atheists in various forms in the records of old philosophy is interesting. These old stories communicate a great deal more than appears intended. There seem to be more similarities than differences in the relation of superstition, atheism, and tradition in different time periods.
I've been on a sort of binge of your videos recently and have found myself in a bit of a dilemma. I for a long time have considered myself an atheist (suffering from suitcase Jesus the entire time) despite me not believing in any God's, that all God's and goddesses are man-made creations. But since stumbling on the Norse God's I want to believe in them, but I'm still a man of science and still hold that they're man-made. So my question is: is there a subsection or term for people like me. Who want to participate, give offerings, partake in rituals and the like but still say "I like them, what they stand for, and their personalities. But I don't think they exist." And if there's not, how do I get over that boundary and take a leap of faith (pun intended)
I believe you’d neatly fall into the category of Atheopagan. I’m in a similar state. I’ve had experiences with them, but I’m still too scientific to believe in them as-is, but Odin seems to not mind..
@@robertd9067 Odin would seem to be more forgiving on that front. God of wisdom I'm sure he would understand the leap from what we know to going off faith
I think you're just feeling a pull towards the 'virtues' and implications such faith represent. Religions are just expressions of humanity, and just like one might find certain music or food likeable and others not, you also like certain faiths more than others. Perhaps it goes deeper than that and most humans naturally has a need for faith, just like other primary needs? I don't know, I'm just another ape on two legs. But don't let my atheistic ramblings stop you if you feel this is the way personally. If you yourself feel this is genuine, I'd say go for it. Tbh there's a reason why I'm following OceanKeltoi as well :)
I go with the term .. agnostic .. From what I gather over the past ten years of watching YT, agnostic is along the lines of " I think there might be a G*D without having the belief in one. But as far as I am sure of, it is not that Jesus one most Christians talk about." From an academic point of view, just go through the Norse Nine Realms as different parts of the human mental make up, different personality traits. Same thing regards the " Lesser Key of Solomon," the 72 angels( virtues ) and 72 demons ( flaws/ vices/ sins) as being aspects of the human mind. In earlier bronze age writings it was a single angel/ lesser godhead with a virtue & vice, and that being was split into two parts. As a few Jewish scholars stated, " early bronze age psychology." Nine Realms, nine months of pregnancy, .. 1.) Infant 2.) grade school/ child 3.) Junior high school/ teenager/ youth .. learning to become an adult. 4.) Young adult/ wild times or becoming a parent and farming/ fishing. 5.) Dealing with your own teenagers. " wild times " 6.) Grand parent/ elder, the opening of the Third Eye/ astral travel .. communing with spirits/ angels. Around 49 to 60 years of age. Catholics into mysticism of angels start to see .. beings .. and talking to ancestors about this time. Southern Baptist have other views regarding this type of behavior, so disregard what S.B. have to say about any of it. 7.) Weakening of the body, with modern health supplements you might last another 20 years. " Greater spiritual awaking " 8.) Knocking on Heavens Door, yeah your body is shutting down and dying. Which can happen within a year time or less. 9.) Have to break it to you, you are dead now .. dirt nap time. Chinese Buddhist following the Eight Fold Path will view this passing a bit different.
@@benjiman_OBE Exactly. In fact there are cases of myths meshing closely with science. For example there’s a Tibetan myth that states that humanity descends from primates and according to Darwin (as well as paleontological and archaeological evidence) humanity descends from primates. So we have an example of a myth fitting with scientific discovery. And before you ask, this myth predates Darwin as according to a website (I need more information to confirm it) this story was first recorded in the 7th century. Also Hindu mythology talks about billions of years for the history of the universe which fits with astronomy.
I recently found both my parents names originate with the Norse 1 was first introduced to England in the raid of 1066 which was from the neatherlands bt before that when it was frisia the other predates 600 ad and Scandinavian and I've found it in the sagas I've been binging on my heritage ever since you never know what you'll find when you eventually look proud to say my peoples culture survived Christianity.
Gotta say, regardless of what I believe in, mad respect for the dude who just went, "I've never offered Odin a thing and it hasn't hurt me yet. I think I'm gonna try my luck with my strength." Believe in the Aesir or not, I absolutely believe Thor and even Odin himself had to have some degree of respect for that guy.
"Bite" - I think, is that the sword, finally manages to hit a critical point, vein or organ, and is as such a fatal hit... You can cut someone, and even stab them, with out killing them... Even multible times... I don't think they had advanced anatomical knownledge in ancient days... So bite = lethal cut/stab...
I would like to point out that a term "apatheist" might be relevant to this video. Apatheist is a person who simply doesn't care if a god exists and, unless it can be proven one way or another finds the discussion irrelevant. Considering this atheist would be considered one who believes god doesn't exist. Apatheist doesn't care if it exists since there are no proof one way or another and it changes nothing.
In the Danish language we have to this day an expression that goes " det bider ikke på ham". Loosely translated "it doesn't latch (bite) on to him" in other words: it doesn't affect him, which is what is meant here. It's a poetic expression. And I'm thinking you know this already Mr. Keltoi. 😉 Similarly it can be said that the cold can be biting, hence frostbite. In Danish we call it a biting cold even though the cold doesn't have teeth. Biting, to bite or to be bitten can, in Danish, be used in many different regards, our dictionary has 10'ish different explanations on it's usage.
I haven't read all the Sagas, but I got a huge volume of most of them for Christmas, and the term, "bit into" or "bite through" is very common. Almost like swords are viewed as animals. Either that or maybe every sword back then was jagged 😂 obviously I'm joking, but if someone could explain why the term was used, that would be amazing
There's a number of swords that have the name 'biter' and swords themselves have been associated with teeth themselves, as if they are a spiked tooth in and of themselves. It's a kenning and the referencing of a kenning. Just as men are often referred to as trees or even 'battle trees' and a battle might be referred to as a 'forest' of sorts.
This makes me ponder how the name Ketill was pronounced back in the day. Obviously the modern name sounds nothing like the English word "kettle", but I can't speak for Old Norse times. In fact, I don't think the sound Norwegians use for that K (normally represented as KJ in modern Norwegian) actually exists in English. 🤔
Do you think rocks are Puns?
yes
@@OceanKeltoi gneiss
I know you take your viewers' tolerance of puns for granite, but I assure you, I have no apatite for your wordplay! It isn't very gneiss to do this to people! And I'm sure there are plenty of others who share my sediments on the matter.
If puns are no longer allowed on this channel, that is a whole different Ketill of fish.
Something something rocks are sandwich
“HAHAHAHAHA YES MY FELLOWS TODAY WE WILL RAID THAT MONASTERY AND SHOW THOSE CHRISTIANS THE POWER OF reason, logic, and the scientific method.”
Maybe soon when fall hits, but not now store you're power.
I hate atheist like that. They play right into wiew of some fundamentalist of science as atheist agenda.
Through these experiments we have demonstrated: it is ineffective to defend your gold and art with a bunch of self-righteous scholars.
@@petrfedor1851 They all need to get outta the house, as for the other ones that help then do harm are fine.
@@petrfedor1851 idk give af about those "atheists" that play and talk about a deity 24/7.... What a boring life tho
"It seems that he believes only in his luck, wit and strenght... And his magic sword u know that's pretty cool."
I often wonder the thing.. WHERE does the MAGIC come from... one might say... if its magic.. it would HAVE to be the GODs
@@2cbadvideos unless they believed the magic they used came from their will alone. Their own strength.
@@2cbadvideos That will depend on the "theology" of the religion but most religions would be different from magic, sense a magic trick or curse is not a mirachle. In christian theology simon the magician is a somewhat clear example of the difference of divine power from magic. Magic is the ancient man of seen the sciences, astronomy comes from astrology, alchemy and chemestry, geomancy and geology and so on, alan more has some nice ideas about it. IMHO the diference is magic comes from dark (secret) arts and science in principle is suposed to be democratic. What I mean by that is the only way you learn a spell is by the study of the secret words, that aint suposed to be learned by everyone around you. The witch dr is not going to explain to you his arts.
Plot twist: It's the meteoric-iron sword of Terry Pratchett.
Some of these stories of atheist or at least non-believing warriors who converted to Christianity solely for the sake of fighting for a king are fascinating. They are good tells of a pattern in which many people embraced Christianity not because of some great realization of deep theological "truths" or because of the "rationality" of the religion, but because they went with the flow.
And also just pure respect for a foreign warrior.
@Freki Bodgaedir ? Okay. Just don't go around spouting nonsense then, it does no one good.
@Freki Bodgaedir So fucking brave dude announcing it for the world to see, you're so special I want to shake your hand and give you keys to the city of Nobody Gives a Shit
People did that all of the time back then and now. Pledge allegiance to the God of some city when doing service for the administration.
Not much difference than the oaths people take to the various municipalities.
Although, it's not very biblical is kinda more of a pagan behavior and that's probably especially why they really didn't mind it initially.
It was just another God to throw in
Yep
"Any story with a were-bear is worth reading, at least once." We laughed hard at that one. You got a subscribe out of that.
“Wanderers… some heathen, some godless, but all the same depending on each other, leaning into their might, their luck, their strength.”
Sounds like a statement pretty applicable to many of us on this pagan path together. This gave me chills in a good way. Skal brothers and sisters!
It’s the smirk after that pun…. Sir, contain your glee.
no
@@OceanKeltoi methinks the lady doth protest to much
The swords 'bite' used to be quite common in poetic speak. It is a reference to the blade of the weapon, which was considered to be its bite. That suggests to me that it was saying the blade of the weapon finally started working to take the person down. It's bite getting through is just a prettier way to say the same thing.
oh I know. I just had this image of the sword with a mouth full of teeth while I was recording it and embraced the ADHD
@@OceanKeltoi I will now throw a mimic sword at my party because of this
A similar expression is still used in modern Norwegian; both in a literal sense of e.g. a tool intended to cut some material, and in a figurative sense of something affecting a person's physical or mental well-being ("This weather does not bite me, I'm used to it.")
@@wacky518thetoastmage8 They'll probably make it a pet....
I've heard this as literally in sagas. As the berserker is immune to the sword but not being literally bitten by a person.
Ketill seems like my kind of dude: Adventurous Viking who loves his little girl enough to let her make her own choices AND will violence people in support of those choices.
I liked that bit at the end about not having room for mockery to stand together. Its very relevant.
There might have even been Buddhist vikings. When I saw Buddhism represented in the TV show Vikings I was a bit skeptic of the historical accuracy (even though I'm aware they've traveled to far-off places). When I Googled it I found an article discussing how a little Buddha figurine dating to the Viking age had been found in irrc Sweden. It could've traveled there indirectly through trade, without any information on its meaning, but if intercontinental travel was common enough for it to end up there, I wouldn't be surprised if a few vikings knew about the religion/philosophy.
That would be a very interesting topic I think for 2 reasons: 1. Buddhism lends itself well to being syncretic. Some argue it's not even a religion and more of a philosophy so it would be interesting to see how it meshes with these European polytheistic beliefs. 2. In Buddhist lore the Buddha is higher than any god because the Buddha is the Enlightened One. The Buddha has achieved enlightenment and in Buddhist scriptures you can even find the Buddha teaching gods on how to achieve enlightenment, would be an interesting perspective. Also the Buddha no longer exists because becoming a Buddha means you are able to break the cycle of Samsara and not reincarnate upon death. Mahayana Buddhism believes that anyone can become a Buddha and a Bodhisattva is one who has declared intention to become a Buddha and is thus on the Buddha-path. Bodhisattvas exist to help liberate all beings from the cycle of Samsara by helping them to achieve enlightenment while they are on the path for their own, and all beings would include the gods.
Before I watch this video, I’d just like to say that “The Godless Ones”, as a title for a group, sounds very metal.
These godless ones sound like Klingons as described in the wedding of Worf and Jadzia: Our gods were too much trouble, so we killed them and now trust to our own skill.
The godless ones believe in their own strength, there may be gods above and gods below but the only gods capable of changing your life are the ones who live within yourself.
Gods have retreated into the minds of men if Nietzche is to be believed
Nietzsche is the best.
Luciferian basics
@The Matrix Hardly as weak as those putting their faith in some fantasy god or gods so they can pass the buck so to speak and not take responsibility for themselves.
@@samaelcercunnin5227 allah is a weak god actually , if your religion gets destroyed but somehow you manage to sustain your existence and return back to the mainstream I'd call that strength , allah however doesn't thrive on the devotion of his followers but rather on their fears , he's an evil god..... basically the god of Abrahamic faiths is an evil god which shouldn't come off as a surprise to anyone , just look what is currently happening in the world all in the name of that god but using different religions
That was a great pun, take my like
Me: *Starts video
Ocean: *Makes some really bad dad jokes
Me: Why are you the way that you are?
Love your work Ocean!
After almost 40 years of watching my mother's religion tear itself apart, I can only conclude that a society that cannot tolerate atheists eventually comes to be intolerant of itself. These guys are great examples of "live and let live" that I wish xtianity hadn't countermanded for its own ends so we could disabuse more people of the notion that monotheism is the "only safe option". My partner struggles with the Catholicism his addict mother "raised" him with, the Spiritual experiences of his own UPG, and my steadfastness on my own Pagan path. I'm tempted to hand him the Cowboy Havamal, not to convert him, but at least to give him the kind of "Be the best whatever you already are," wisdom and comfort I found first in Buddhism before wandering north and west, so to speak.
I believe that religion in the West is "tearing itself apart" because it is not our true faith, and that Christianity actually exists to cut us from divinity. The Havamal is our book. Hail the Gods! Hail the folk! Hail the AFA!
Yes you are right an Sword cut can be discribed with bite as a synonym, in German we still do so, for extrem sharp Blades or for someone who is not afraid of stronger or more eneies
ore someone who swimms agains the stream and so on, we use some times the synonym he has bite or he/it is bity
Interesting! I guess the English equivalent here would be "edge" (for swords) and "edgy" (for the swim-against-the-stream people)? Two slightly different meanings wrapped up in one word.
some of these stories kind of remind me of an old family story I've been told. We are Melungeons but the family story is is we had an issue over land with a family, waited until the family attended church, then locked the doors and killed everyone a few hundred years ago. We were told to avoid the spiders as they gave knowledge and there is a west African spider god of wisdom (something melungeons are at least partially genetically) so it might be associated with that god in the belief in wisdom. they at least ignored the power over the church and chose to do what benefitted them.
I think I'm going to refer to myself as a godless one rather than an atheist now. :P
I certainly does sound more dramatic!
Aye
Its very accurate, and you will be going to Hell
@@fiddlesticks7245 see you there.
@@punkrockllama I'll be sure to ask you about your story when Dante and I are walking to Purgatory
Thank you, Ocean. I appreciate the work you did digging through to make this and thought you did a fantastic presentation.
Negation of claims doesn't necessarily mean denial of an entity. In philosophical atheism, this means a denial (or lack) of the belief in a deity or deities. Think if someone, named Joshua, claimed he was god and you said you don't accept it (i.e. the Negation). You're not refusing his existence rather denying his claim. I don't accept the claims of a divine but that is independent of there actually being an divine entity.
Amazing video!! And I am a weeb so the sword biting reminded me of Kisame Hoshigaki
's sword in Naruto. And the end part reminds me of what atheists and pagans should be doing and that is helping each other regardless if it is in a war or not but in general life . And again amazing video!!
Monotheists kinda gross me out. I get the appeal of polytheism and animism. Used to practice it. It was comforting. I became an atheist because no matter who I have prayed to in the last 30 years, my deepest heart's desire never came true. I was never healed from my chronic illness. So I gave up. I have made progress by trusting evidence based approaches. But nothing good ever happened concerning my prayers when I trusted gods. At first I thought they were ignoring me on purpose, but I prayed to around a hundred gods, and none of them helped. They don't all get along in the mythology, so why would they all agree not to help me? It would be out of character for them to agree on just this one thing. I couldn't think of a reason that all of them would intentionally ignore my prayers. So I became irreligious. For a few months I was just angry they were ignoring me. Then I became an apatheist. Basically, I realized that the gods were either evil, impotent, or imaginary and I didn't particularly care which was the case. However, I saw some of what the damage was from monotheism, and how polytheism could be just as deadly if the trend towards organization continues, so I became a proper atheist.
@@indoorsandout3022 Thank you for that breakdown of your spiritual journey. But, I think that an individual regardless of they are religious or not has the ability to be deadly or dangerous if radicalized. Rather it be monotheists or polytheists or atheists or anything in between them or outside of those labels. Anyone can be deadly and dangerous if they have a catalyst to be so or upbringing in the home or other factors.
Again thank you for replying and breaking down your spiritual journey and your journey to atheism :D
@@DrDino123 My pleasure. While I have direct experience of monotheistic extremism (having been in a cult and having lost friends in the wars in the middle east), I am less wary of paganism because it doesn't seem to be flirting with doomsday prophecy or genocide. I'm not really worried about individual radical elements. The trend towards organization is worrisome because if a large group radicalizes around a leader, that would be a major problem.
Came for the pagan content, stayed for the puns
Makes me realise how closely we connect Vikings to Norse mythology, even though Vikings are mostly - if not only - called Viking because of the act of viking. Doesn't surprise me one bit if there were atheists among them, though I'd struggle to imagine which of their blood would believe in other mythos than the Norse.
Then Ketill got in a heated exchange with Paut and Paut called Ketill "svartalf". Ketill replied that this was hypocritical of Paut as they were both svartalfar.
Lmfao 😂
Having recently become interested in Norse paganism due to the influence of a good friend, I have found other of your videos very informative, but as an atheist myself this one in particular attracted my attention. I believe you make the valid point that the definition of “atheist” is somewhat in the eye of the beholder, and because of that I do not believe, however, that someone’s saying, “I don’t sacrifice to Odin,” demonstrates by itself that he was an atheist. It allows for the possibility that he believed Odin existed, but he didn’t need or expect anything he might have gotten in return from worship and sacrifices (and possibly due to prior disappointing personal experience). A somewhat clearer example of my point would be, “I don’t care what the wood spirits think; I’m not afraid of them.” I.e., “I believe the spirits exist, but do not fear or need to propitiate them.” You do admit that someone could have been considered to be “godless” without necessarily believing that the gods didn’t exist, but I’m one of those who believes that that does not make them atheists in any meaningful sense.
As another point it’s true that by the usual definition it’s possible to be an atheist without rejecting belief in all supernatural entities. I suspect that most atheists who have given the subject significant thought and analysis do so, but is it absolutely necessary? I’ve known self-described atheists who do accept the possibility of such entities, but what’s the difference between a god and any other supernatural being that has god-like powers? Believers conceive of countless gods that aren’t omnipotent or have all the other characteristics of the Christian God. At perhaps the bottom tier of the hierarchy might be the souls of the dead. If, however, they can communicate with the living, then they can do things we living people cannot. A step up might be a ghost that’s capable of traveling through solid walls, or moving objects around in the house, presumably through the power of only its will. No living being can do such a thing, so what’s the difference between a ghost and a minor god that the atheist says doesn’t exist? And that question extends to people who claim to be monotheists: both Christians and Muslims believe in the angels and demons that are indistinguishable from the minor gods of pagan pantheons (as far as I can tell).
If you’re still reading this, I am curious what you may think about “secular pagans,” or those who cannot believe in supernatural beings, but wish to formally and avowedly adhere to the religion’s tenets and values as a belief system. That is, people who are somewhat like those who state they follow Jesus’ teachings, and even consider themselves to be Christians, but don’t believe he was God. Thanks again for your insights and explanations.
How you doing Brothers
Together we will rid the world order and banish the darkness.
I would posit that whether to believe in and follow the philosophy alone or to accept the gods and the philosophy is of no real consequence to the the gods, I am sure that they have other matters to attend to rather than worrying about us individually. I would, and do, extend my hand to those with core values similar to my own. Personally, I believe in the gods, a much more important question is do they believe in me. Good fellowship is hard to find, the details of someone's beliefs trouble me not. So drive on my secular friends, it is good to have you all in the boat. Besides I practice poorly, I sacrifice infrequently.
@@chriscary5302 May the Gods watch over you my friend
So, now that you are an expert at puns, does that make you a pundit?
what do you call an atheist business?
a non-prophet organisation......... 🙂
Are u proud of that I hope so
Really -_-
i am disappointed
I feel a legitimate existential pain at that joke.
I'll leave a like to try and get more people to experience such misery.
@@thesocialistsarecoming8565 Freedom and peace, if you can't get a grip on what's going on? Then i say you fix that query.
Once again the Norse culture is deeper and far more complex than what you see in most shows or is covered in schools in the UK . Thank you for a great video
THE SMIRK OMG THE SMIRK ON 'PUNISHMENT'
never punderestimate me
The line about only believing in one's own strength was used so much I'm wondering if it was more of a writing trope
Probably, we still have the power fantasy trope in all forms of media; from the doom slayer to my little pony to several books, manga, and comics.
Bro your intro music is beyond epic! Thanks for all the great info you def have a completely different perspective and vibe than anyone else and that certainly keeps me watching !
In my mind, a blade can bite, and im confused at how this is not intuitive. I was always taught that a blade would "bite you" to accept you as it's master. This is meant to say that it is not truly yours until an accidental drawing of blood. Anything from a tiny prick to horrible accident would meet the requirements. The other side of the practice is this: if you carried a blade which has not been blooded and if it bites someone else while using it with your blessing, then honor demands the person bitten immediately become the blade's master.
I get its superstitious, but this has always seemed perfectly intuitive.
Heckin' hard to overstate how glad I am to have found this channel, gods be willing I hope to cross paths with you and the others from the Heathen High Five (if the stars align); in the states or here in Sweden. Big thanks for the work you put into these videos, and for being one of the clear and concise voices of good within heathenry!
Heckin? What is wrong with heathens why are you all, bar none, the most unlovable freaks ever
correction: apunism is not "to lack puns." The "a-" in apunism should be understood as an active negation in normative punosophy. **snort** **guffaw** **choke**
Man I really relate to these Godless. I’ve never liked the terms agnostic or atheist, and I love learning about religion (especially from you pegans), I’m just not a believer in any particular God.
But the phrase “makes offerings to no Gods.” It kinda suits me. I’m sorta a wanderer after being “cast out” of Mormonism anyway.
Great video. Gave me a lot to think about.
Hello, fellow ex-mo! Ditto here: no home to return to, but happily a guest of whoever all will share their metaphorical table.
Yep. Even though I’m a believer in science I do believe in the existence of the various gods and goddesses. I mean there are cases of mythology fitting nicely with scientific discoveries. One such example is a myth from Tibet regarding the origin of humanity, which the story specifies descend from primates and we know that humanity descend from primates thanks to archaeological discoveries and scientific research. So you have to wonder where the Tibetans figured that humanity and primates are relatives.
@@mirandagoldstine8548 I mean we do physically resemble them, so i personally wouldn’t be surprised that that’s a religious story. Not trying to downplay them
@@sabinske8692 True. But the fact that the people of Tibet figured out a connection between humanity and primates a long time ago is mind boggling. Apparently this story was set to paper in the 7th century, long before Charles Darwin proposed his theory of evolution, much less born. Also Hindu mythology mentions that the Earth is very, very, very old. They are off by a couple of billion years but the fact that Indian mythology states the earth is really old is amazing. We know the universe is 13.7 billion years old and the earth 4.5 billion based on astrophysics so the fact that Hinduism argues the universe is much older is amazing to think about. I’ll try to find other myths that mesh up with scientific discoveries.
@@mirandagoldstine8548yeah, it is mind boggling that a group of religious people thought of that before an actual scientist. Religion is a wonder for sure, sometimes I think of it as a parable the Buddha once said, a bunch a blind men touching a elephant in different places, all touching the same elephant but each one feeling something different.
Gods damn it Ocean your puns will be the death of me. I also love tjis perspective that some atheism of the past might be a rejection of tradition deity whorship :) brings things into perspective
The expression of a sword “biting” may genuinely be an artistic way of saying what a blade chipped in battle, or a duel for that matter, does.
It no longer cuts, it rips thru flesh more akin to a bite rather than a cut.
Awesome, insightful as always!
The opening puns made me a subscriber. This is the first video of yours I have seen, but i am extremely impressed. Skald, friend.
Excellent video on a rarely discussed topic! I especially liked the part about the wandering bands who may have composed the Havamal. It gives me a new perspective and a new way of reading the purpose of the text's practical advice!
So I found you from the God of War Thor video and while I'm not a member of your religion I really enjoy the content and I find a lot of similarities between my own world view and the way you describe the godless ones so thanks for showing me a piece of history and mythology I had no idea existed
Absolutely fascinating video! Loved it!
I love it! I always how your videos always encourage so many questions, and more research! 💖
Not wanting to worship a god and thinking they don't exist are two different things. Tywin from game of thrones in a good example of the latter.
The vid was very thought provoking...I will watch again n see about the outcome from my meditation on the rock !!!!
Thanks!
Hahaha great opener and great content thereafter!
Note to self, acquire a magic sword
13:20 They were neither Christian nor Heathen, but followed no gods. They and their band of men believed in their own power and success. Meaning their strenght and their luck. And that in their experience this had proved well enough.
Very inspiring!
This is so interesting, thanks!!
My father, 100% Norwegian, after 2 wars on ships, running boats from Seattle to Nome fir a few years, then spent 53 years in a career cutting with knives. I thank him for his knowledge in edged instruments. Im accused of making knives too sharp...no such thing. Anyway...when he tested a recently sharpened blade, whether knife, axe, etc, he ALWAYS said, " look ir feel for the bite" . A simple example: take a known sharp knife and a known dull knife of relative weight. Hold the handle with thumb and index finger allowing the weight of the knife to rest on a thumbnail. Pull back. The sharp one should "bite" and drag a bit as a result. Bite is considered the entrance of a blade into it's target.
I fall within the realm of the godless ones (modern atheists). However, I have maintained a strong desire to connect with a deity. So far, nothing has really pulled through as evidential enough to claim me. One would technically call me an Agnostic-Atheist since I am open to the possibility but I think a deity would need to make their presence very obvious in order to sway me.
Apparently, if a messenger defeats you in a wrestling match, that used to be considered proof enough.
You've literally see the deity everyday and night and even learned about it in school, yet you still deny?
@@levilamont8005 I must not see gods as you do. So yes, I deny the existence of deities. Nothing in the way of a God has actually made itself evident to me.
No existence of a god necessary. I found my spirituality to be healthier and more logical when I became atheist. I'd say I'm more spiritual as an atheist than I ever was when I was religious
@@joeasberry6014 Precisely right!
'Bite' when it comes to a sword is a pretty common term for cutting into something. I'm very confident that Ketil's sword was a regular sword with no teeth!
What is the actual Norse/Icelandic term used for the godless ones?
WE
WE WILL RESIST AND BITE
BITE HARD
BECAUSE WE'RE ALL IN SIGHT
Thank you for this!
Glorious execution of that pun lol
Well, it's logical to use "bite" to describe a blade cutting flesh. In older texts anyway... Other words I often see use are devour, eat, ravage, and swallow, all denoting an "eating" habit. Whence this came from is unknown but as old as the first inscriptions of combat.
Awesome this is unique the best and only video here. Awesome work! ☮️ ❤️
I love everything about that intro. ❤️❤️❤️
I like that you used warlord
A fellow for honor player
18:02 "it's good to have people at your back."
I wouldn't know. I've never had anyone at my back that didn't try to stab me there
I really appreciate the work you do. This was very enlightening. Thank you.
Love the sneeze joke from Dane Cook... that is hilarious...
I saw this video title, and thought I have never read something so captivating in my life lol
biting is a common term used in germanic laguages for a weapons hit and wounding a opponent used in Poeatic speech and novels.
I follow the philosophy of the old heathen ways. That said, do I believe there is a one eyed god, armed with a magical spear and riding an eight legged horse across the heavens? No.
However, do I find wisdom in the old stories? Yes, and easily.
Excellent!
Had to watch this one , interesting and awesome video ocean !
I use a similar logic (to "denial of many gods") when talking to friends who aren't sure what to think when they find out I'm an atheist; usually they're Christian, so I ask "do you believe in Zeus? Thor? Shiva?" then when they (of course) say "no", I say, "well, see, you're an atheist too, I'm just an atheist about one more god than you".
I've seen that before. Though it's a dialogue tree that wouldn't work very well on a polytheist.
@@OceanKeltoi I don't really get this argument, which I've heard many times. An atheist is not someone who doesn't believe in a specific god, it's someone without a god belief.
I mean, If you believe in Thor, Odin, Ymir but don't believe in Yahweh, you are not an atheist of Yahweh, you are a theist who doesn't believe in Yahweh.
As you say, it doesn't work on a polytheist, but it does not work on a christian too.
@@OceanKeltoi Yeah, it's not as common a point to make, but then, I've rarely had polytheists show any concern about my atheism. The hostility and negative conotations just don't come from ya'll so much in the modern world (where I live); the pagans/polytheists and other similar groups tend to shrug and be like "that's cool, you do you".
@@ColpoRosso We're not being literal. It's just a comparison of the state of disbelief (with some facetious language). It gives them something to relate to; Christians (at least, most in my experience) don't disbelieve in Zeus because they hate him, or because they "don't want to be accountable to him" (common claims by Christians in the US about atheists), they just have never been convinced he exists (or that he's a god), so they don't believe. Same as me.
Do you beleive in Zeus Thor? Shiva?
Yes? Though, I don't really know who Shiva is
Certainly a thought-provoking video this time around.
The occasional appearance of atheists in various forms in the records of old philosophy is interesting. These old stories communicate a great deal more than appears intended.
There seem to be more similarities than differences in the relation of superstition, atheism, and tradition in different time periods.
I've been on a sort of binge of your videos recently and have found myself in a bit of a dilemma. I for a long time have considered myself an atheist (suffering from suitcase Jesus the entire time) despite me not believing in any God's, that all God's and goddesses are man-made creations. But since stumbling on the Norse God's I want to believe in them, but I'm still a man of science and still hold that they're man-made. So my question is: is there a subsection or term for people like me. Who want to participate, give offerings, partake in rituals and the like but still say "I like them, what they stand for, and their personalities. But I don't think they exist." And if there's not, how do I get over that boundary and take a leap of faith (pun intended)
I believe you’d neatly fall into the category of Atheopagan. I’m in a similar state. I’ve had experiences with them, but I’m still too scientific to believe in them as-is, but Odin seems to not mind..
@@robertd9067 Odin would seem to be more forgiving on that front. God of wisdom I'm sure he would understand the leap from what we know to going off faith
I think you're just feeling a pull towards the 'virtues' and implications such faith represent. Religions are just expressions of humanity, and just like one might find certain music or food likeable and others not, you also like certain faiths more than others. Perhaps it goes deeper than that and most humans naturally has a need for faith, just like other primary needs? I don't know, I'm just another ape on two legs.
But don't let my atheistic ramblings stop you if you feel this is the way personally. If you yourself feel this is genuine, I'd say go for it. Tbh there's a reason why I'm following OceanKeltoi as well :)
I go with the term .. agnostic ..
From what I gather over the past ten years of watching YT, agnostic is along the lines of " I think there might be a G*D without having the belief in one. But as far as I am sure of, it is not that Jesus one most Christians talk about."
From an academic point of view, just go through the Norse Nine Realms as different parts of the human mental make up, different personality traits. Same thing regards the
" Lesser Key of Solomon," the 72 angels( virtues ) and 72 demons ( flaws/ vices/ sins) as being aspects of the human mind. In earlier bronze age writings it was a single angel/ lesser godhead with a virtue & vice, and that being was split into two parts. As a few Jewish scholars stated, " early bronze age psychology."
Nine Realms, nine months of pregnancy, ..
1.) Infant
2.) grade school/ child
3.) Junior high school/ teenager/ youth .. learning to become an adult.
4.) Young adult/ wild times or becoming a parent and farming/ fishing.
5.) Dealing with your own teenagers. " wild times "
6.) Grand parent/ elder, the opening of the Third Eye/ astral travel .. communing with spirits/ angels. Around 49 to 60 years of age. Catholics into mysticism of angels start to see .. beings .. and talking to ancestors about this time. Southern Baptist have other views regarding this type of behavior, so disregard what S.B. have to say about any of it.
7.) Weakening of the body, with modern health supplements you might last another 20 years. " Greater spiritual awaking "
8.) Knocking on Heavens Door, yeah your body is shutting down and dying. Which can happen within a year time or less.
9.) Have to break it to you, you are dead now .. dirt nap time.
Chinese Buddhist following the Eight Fold Path will view this passing a bit different.
@@benjiman_OBE Exactly. In fact there are cases of myths meshing closely with science. For example there’s a Tibetan myth that states that humanity descends from primates and according to Darwin (as well as paleontological and archaeological evidence) humanity descends from primates. So we have an example of a myth fitting with scientific discovery. And before you ask, this myth predates Darwin as according to a website (I need more information to confirm it) this story was first recorded in the 7th century. Also Hindu mythology talks about billions of years for the history of the universe which fits with astronomy.
"I don't think that means the sword has teeth......But it could." 😂 exactly what I needed
I recently found both my parents names originate with the Norse 1 was first introduced to England in the raid of 1066 which was from the neatherlands bt before that when it was frisia the other predates 600 ad and Scandinavian and I've found it in the sagas I've been binging on my heritage ever since you never know what you'll find when you eventually look proud to say my peoples culture survived Christianity.
Lol. To say the sword bites is personification. For instance, the wind can also bite but does not have teeth.
A sword "biting" refers to the edge successfully cutting
Nono. Its when the sword noms its opponent.
Maybe *I* can be a magic sword-wielding hero too! This atheism gig is getting better and better. In your face, Od--
Gotta say, regardless of what I believe in, mad respect for the dude who just went, "I've never offered Odin a thing and it hasn't hurt me yet. I think I'm gonna try my luck with my strength." Believe in the Aesir or not, I absolutely believe Thor and even Odin himself had to have some degree of respect for that guy.
"Bite" - I think, is that the sword, finally manages to hit a critical point, vein or organ, and is as such a fatal hit... You can cut someone, and even stab them, with out killing them... Even multible times... I don't think they had advanced anatomical knownledge in ancient days... So bite = lethal cut/stab...
I would like to point out that a term "apatheist" might be relevant to this video. Apatheist is a person who simply doesn't care if a god exists and, unless it can be proven one way or another finds the discussion irrelevant.
Considering this atheist would be considered one who believes god doesn't exist. Apatheist doesn't care if it exists since there are no proof one way or another and it changes nothing.
Never heard of this term before, good to know.
When a sword bites it means it's stuck in the wound, and mostly a wound that is deadly.
Watching this was wonderfully informative! I have long suspected ancient polytheist stories contained sympathetic representations of godless people!
Great content. SKÅL to you!
I keep on hearing “highwaymen” as “high women.”
17:00 - 17:13 That sounds like the premise of a story I'd really like to read!
The trinity comment made me smile lol....glad I'm not the only one that has thought about that
I have a whole video going into my thoughts on it.
I viscerally identify with “Ocean, No.”
The punnnnn!
In the Danish language we have to this day an expression that goes " det bider ikke på ham". Loosely translated "it doesn't latch (bite) on to him" in other words: it doesn't affect him, which is what is meant here. It's a poetic expression. And I'm thinking you know this already Mr. Keltoi. 😉
Similarly it can be said that the cold can be biting, hence frostbite. In Danish we call it a biting cold even though the cold doesn't have teeth. Biting, to bite or to be bitten can, in Danish, be used in many different regards, our dictionary has 10'ish different explanations on it's usage.
It saying the sword bit someone is probably a kenning.
Ketill sounds like a pretty cool papa
I haven't read all the Sagas, but I got a huge volume of most of them for Christmas, and the term, "bit into" or "bite through" is very common. Almost like swords are viewed as animals. Either that or maybe every sword back then was jagged 😂 obviously I'm joking, but if someone could explain why the term was used, that would be amazing
There's a number of swords that have the name 'biter' and swords themselves have been associated with teeth themselves, as if they are a spiked tooth in and of themselves. It's a kenning and the referencing of a kenning. Just as men are often referred to as trees or even 'battle trees' and a battle might be referred to as a 'forest' of sorts.
I didn't know Plutarch was such a boss! I love all the details of that question, which would you prefer?
This makes me ponder how the name Ketill was pronounced back in the day. Obviously the modern name sounds nothing like the English word "kettle", but I can't speak for Old Norse times.
In fact, I don't think the sound Norwegians use for that K (normally represented as KJ in modern Norwegian) actually exists in English. 🤔
The pun cult is bound for life of Brian level shenanigans
Enjoyed your research on “The Godless Ones”.
Jeg skal kalle meg sjøl "den gudløse", høres mye mer badass
Beard too damn thicc
Just thicc enuf
The word "bite" can be used to refer to the breaking of the skin with a sharp weapon.
bite is a kenning for slice or cut.