Very much enjoyed this video. I've been looking at the Olympus and Pentax digital cameras like the one you have. Will be chacking back to watch your other videos. All the best.
Do not know if its possible but links to the cameras you are reviewing would be helpful to purchase. Again not sure if it fits the channel but the reviews are great & would like to see you credited for your work on the camera being reviewed. Thank you Bob. Your a great teacher.
I shoot an E-M5.iii most of the time, my second OM-D, having delightfully worn out an original E-M10, now totally eclipsed. Favorite lens is probably the 17mm f1.8 clutch gizmo. The feature I like most on E-M5.iii is the sensor-based PDAF, which goes directly to the focus lock rather than by successively smaller approximations, so-called CDAF but slightly slower, no biggie. As I think about carrying a second camera I do tend to contemplate an E-M10.iv, but always decide it would make more sense to have an identical camera, mainly because the ISO buttons are different. In particular, the grip on the E-M10.iv is beguiling. I agree with comments about tilt-panel in mild preference on the E-M10 models over the flippy, fold-out panels on the more expensive models. I generally take six or seven lenses out, in a small bag, and feel totally liberated by the flexibility and power of the system. I am somewhat tempted to try the electrically telescoped kit lens 14-42mm to really blur the line with a truly compact camera. All this talk about pocketability is fashionable, but I think the dividing line on who you are with respect to your camera is whether you think the strap is a very good thing or a pain. With it over your shoulder, the camera comes to your eye very quickly, not as a second thought.
I’m trying to get a lens hood for this camera but I’m being told that since the Olympus E-M10 Mark IV is “collapsible”, that no lens hood was made for or will fit on this camera. How can I get a lens hood on my camera like the one you have in this video?
I think “collapsible” refers to the kit kens, not the camera. You can purchase the camera body without that lens. The lens hood is not an issue if you are not shooting into the light, especially with the coating on M. Zuiko lenses. Someone else can correct me if I am wrong.
There are lens hoods available for all of the lenses that are used in this tutorial from Olympus, Amazon and others. I have the 3 lenses that Bob mention 17mm 1.8, 12-40mm Pro and the 40-150mm Pro all with lens hoods. Good luck.
![Olympus OM-D E-M10 MK IV - [Best photography SETTINGS]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/oWiBdFtJQuM/mqdefault.jpg)
the design reminds me of Maitani original design! i love it❤
Very much enjoyed this video. I've been looking at the Olympus and Pentax digital cameras like the one you have. Will be chacking back to watch your other videos. All the best.
Do not know if its possible but links to the cameras you are reviewing would be helpful to purchase. Again not sure if it fits the channel but the reviews are great & would like to see you credited for your work on the camera being reviewed. Thank you Bob. Your a great teacher.
I shoot an E-M5.iii most of the time, my second OM-D, having delightfully worn out an original E-M10, now totally eclipsed. Favorite lens is probably the 17mm f1.8 clutch gizmo. The feature I like most on E-M5.iii is the sensor-based PDAF, which goes directly to the focus lock rather than by successively smaller approximations, so-called CDAF but slightly slower, no biggie. As I think about carrying a second camera I do tend to contemplate an E-M10.iv, but always decide it would make more sense to have an identical camera, mainly because the ISO buttons are different. In particular, the grip on the E-M10.iv is beguiling. I agree with comments about tilt-panel in mild preference on the E-M10 models over the flippy, fold-out panels on the more expensive models. I generally take six or seven lenses out, in a small bag, and feel totally liberated by the flexibility and power of the system. I am somewhat tempted to try the electrically telescoped kit lens 14-42mm to really blur the line with a truly compact camera. All this talk about pocketability is fashionable, but I think the dividing line on who you are with respect to your camera is whether you think the strap is a very good thing or a pain. With it over your shoulder, the camera comes to your eye very quickly, not as a second thought.
Thanks .bough it second hand
What do you think of this vs the Pen E-P7? Is it the same camera without the EVF or are there some other differences? Thanks!
I’m trying to get a lens hood for this camera but I’m being told that since the Olympus E-M10 Mark IV is “collapsible”, that no lens hood was made for or will fit on this camera. How can I get a lens hood on my camera like the one you have in this video?
I think “collapsible” refers to the kit kens, not the camera. You can purchase the camera body without that lens. The lens hood is not an issue if you are not shooting into the light, especially with the coating on M. Zuiko lenses. Someone else can correct me if I am wrong.
There are lens hoods available for all of the lenses that are used in this tutorial from Olympus, Amazon and others. I have the 3 lenses that Bob mention 17mm 1.8, 12-40mm Pro and the 40-150mm Pro all with lens hoods. Good luck.
these days, you can get pretty much everything you can think of from China :)
Thanks is helpful 21:54
Neat
You seems to buy every camera available. What do you use them for? Is one or two camera not enough?
Do you think the Olympus Mark IV is better than the Sony A6100?
Yes !
I was informed em10 has issues with focus with high speed action
*micro usb, not usb c