Losing an engine shouldn't cause the loss of the aircraft, it is part of the reason we have 2 engines in the first place. In the RAF we lost Jags but very very few to engine failures, in fact in the 10 years I worked on them, I don't remember one.
The standard RD-33 engines produce a heavy smoke trail. I would expect carbon deposits on HT components. This would add to non-uniform heat stress and premature failures. It’s a good aircraft, it just needs a better engine.
@@Archit-c2c Fact is RD-33 Klimov is reverse-engineered of Pratt & Whitney J57 from 1960-year shot downed U-2. So as you can see short life of Soviet engines have nothing to do with "high thrust" since j57 used on bunch of American supersonic fighters of the time.
@@thewhite8uard High thrust with Precision made components no problem, high thrust with non precision made part with inferior refractory properties is equal to a lot of problems. same as how the Tu-2 is a relatively badly made copy of the B-29.
@Liquidrocketwolves maybe have a summary at the beginning? Try and organize what you're going to say and put it in sections? Then you could say ok I've got these 5 points to make in order to back up this idea. And then the more stuff you can show the better. You can do PowerPoint right, get some slides to show? Just some ideas, you do you bro.
the engines went out during a high Angle of attack stall maneuver producing unbalanced torque fo lick probably. thank you for the support and commenting🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Your support means a lot to us so go ahead subscribe and share.
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏😊😊
Correction in the Jaguar accidents comment, I Said German instead of french.
Losing an engine shouldn't cause the loss of the aircraft, it is part of the reason we have 2 engines in the first place. In the RAF we lost Jags but very very few to engine failures, in fact in the 10 years I worked on them, I don't remember one.
I think the engine failed during a stall type maneuver or high angle of attack. and thank you for the support🙏🙏🙏
Lots of good information here man thanks.
thank you for the praise, your support means a lot to us.🙏🙏🙏🙏
Speaking as an engine man, that is really bad and I have never seen that amount of damage in any engine I have ever worked on!
The standard RD-33 engines produce a heavy smoke trail. I would expect carbon deposits on HT components. This would add to non-uniform heat stress and premature failures. It’s a good aircraft, it just needs a better engine.
Yeah,Rd-33s are like Race car engines basically, high thrust but short life. With access to good facilities not a bad aircraft.
@@Archit-c2c Fact is RD-33 Klimov is reverse-engineered of Pratt & Whitney J57 from 1960-year shot downed U-2. So as you can see short life of Soviet engines have nothing to do with "high thrust" since j57 used on bunch of American supersonic fighters of the time.
@@thewhite8uard High thrust with Precision made components no problem, high thrust with non precision made part with inferior refractory properties is equal to a lot of problems.
same as how the Tu-2 is a relatively badly made copy of the B-29.
III series (and newer) RD-33 are smokeless, so are all RD-33MK and RD-93 (JF-17).
Yes, smokeless but still older iterations have problems with refractory properties.
This was tough to watch. Takes a long time for him to get to the point.
very new to this still learning, Next time will add timestamps for time savvy individuals.
thank you for the support appreciate it.🙏🙏🙏🙏
@Liquidrocketwolves maybe have a summary at the beginning? Try and organize what you're going to say and put it in sections? Then you could say ok I've got these 5 points to make in order to back up this idea. And then the more stuff you can show the better. You can do PowerPoint right, get some slides to show? Just some ideas, you do you bro.
@@Liquidrocketwolves take some notes from mellienum 7* historytech, he does a pretty steller job
will do bro, and thank you for the Support 🙏🙏🙏🙏
good video man!!
Thank you bro. appreciate all the support.🙏🙏🙏🙏
MiG was spinning because it lost all lift. Engines have nothing to do with it.
the engines went out during a high Angle of attack stall maneuver producing unbalanced torque fo
lick probably.
thank you for the support and commenting🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
❤
I don't really consider Russian aircrafts, they look heavier and bulkier but better choice for wider regions
Yes they are like the Mig-25 was a literal bus. thank you for the support🙏🙏🙏🙏
Great video. I suggest you buy a quality microphone and your videos will get 10x more views. Audio quality is really bad.
thank you for the praise.any recommendations for Mics will be appreciated too.🙏🙏🙏🙏
pattern of speech is North American. I understood it very well.
Thank you🙏🙏🙏🙏
Germans never flew Jags
meant to say french, didnt add a correction on the video. thank you.
itna accent angrezi kaise sikha?
English is not my Native language. thank you for the support.