Розмір відео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показувати елементи керування програвачем
Автоматичне відтворення
Автоповтор
Why changing the equations works?
Is this the fixed point iteration for non linear equations?
That's really amazing. Thank you very much!
Thank you for the explanation. That was very easy to get.
There is an error in either your equation for Y or your process. Your equation for Y states to use Xi but when you did the process you used Xi+1 since you used the most updated X. To find Yo you shouldered used Xo being 1.5.
For Gauss siedel, you use the most recent value of X
@@ovais217 : Correct, and thus to avoid confusion the equation should have been written out as y(i+1) = 57- (3 * x(i+1) * y(i))
thanks
how you are guessing intial values
I do a quick graph or rough table to get my first estimates
@@pattonluks can you please give the explanation.
Why changing the equations works?
Is this the fixed point iteration for non linear equations?
That's really amazing. Thank you very much!
Thank you for the explanation. That was very easy to get.
There is an error in either your equation for Y or your process. Your equation for Y states to use Xi but when you did the process you used Xi+1 since you used the most updated X. To find Yo you shouldered used Xo being 1.5.
For Gauss siedel, you use the most recent value of X
@@ovais217 : Correct, and thus to avoid confusion the equation should have been written out as y(i+1) = 57- (3 * x(i+1) * y(i))
thanks
how you are guessing intial values
I do a quick graph or rough table to get my first estimates
@@pattonluks can you please give the explanation.