17. Imam Ali’s opinion of Abu Bakr & Umar | Sayed Ammar Nakshawani | Holy Ramadan 2024/1445
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 бер 2024
- Imam Hussein TV 3 Presents this Holy Month of Ramadan:
‘Shia and Sunni: Rapprochement & Conflict’
An exclusive lecture series with the world-renowned Dr. Sayed Ammar Nakshawani
Dr. Sayed Ammar will provide an insight into some of the core topics which affect our beliefs, theology and jurisprudential system whilst also analysing the literature and viewpoints of scholars from other sects in the religion of Islam
Join us every night for the first 24 nights of Holy Ramadan, starting at 19:30 U.K. exclusively on Imam Hussein TV 3
Like, follow and subscribe to Imam Hussein TV’s official UA-cam channel here: ua-cam.com/users/imamhuss...
Support Imam Hussein TV: www.imamhussein3.tv/donate
Make sure you're following Imam Hussein TV for all the latest.
Facebook: / imamhusseintv3
Twitter: / imamhusseintv3
Instagram: / imamhusseintv3
UA-cam: / imamhussein3tv
Website: imamhussein3.tv
Telegram: t.me/imamhusseintv3
WhatsApp: wa.me/447939917163
Watch IHTV3 using the following methods:
• Website: imamhussein3.tv/live
• Android & iOS App: onelink.to/ihtv
• UA-cam: ua-cam.com/users/imamhuss...
• Download on Smart TV's: Samsung TV, LG TV & Android TV
• Also on: Apple TV, RoKu, Amazon Fire & CTV
Imam Hussein TV 1 (Persian) : bit.ly/2zcmtCv
Imam Hussein TV 2 (Arabic) : bit.ly/2TwiXvk
Imam Hussein TV 3 (English) : bit.ly/2vfClRT
Imam Hussein TV 4 (Urdu) : bit.ly/2DvXrRH
AlZahra (Turkish): bit.ly/2ORtYnl
Morning Baraka: bit.ly/2OvrN9Z
Subhanallah, the truth is being unfolded from every possible angle. Sayed Ammar has opened the eyes of our Sunni brothers and Shia 🤲💯
To how stupid shiism is true. And he fools the followers of dajjal
maa shaa' Allah, he's sure catching me as a (previous) sunni follower of the manhaj of the salaf us-saaliheen.
but in more part, i am considering to follow the path of imaam ahmad al-hasan through his qaa'im, aba as-saadiq 'abdullah hashem.
may Allahu, subhaanahu wata'aala, give us the tawfeeq, ameen.
@@agreeableviews8166 Abu Bakr ❤️ RA Umar ❤️ RA
i am not contending with abu bakr as-sadeeq, radhee Allahu 'anhu, whatsoever. him & i never met.@@AbdullahArguer
i am not contending with 'umar ibn al-khattab, radhee Allahu 'anhu. he & i never met.@@AbdullahArguer
As a Sunni listening to Sayed Ammar's brilliant and factual expose I can only make dua by reciting "
Salawat
O’ Allah, bless
Muhammad and the
progeny of Muhammad and hasten their reappearance.
And destroy their enemies, from the Jinns and humans; from the first and the last "
We have the freedom of choice but it is actually a freedom of no choice. There is HAQ and there is BATIL.
Then why continue on the BATIL path when the truth has touched your heart brother?
Be open and embrace the HAQ.
My comment does embrace HAQ which is the Holy Household of the Holy Prophet SAWW! All else is BATIL
You are correct. BATIL I should not have mentioned.
@@Khalid-fv4mfThan it’s time that you revert to the school theology of Ahlulbayt. Allah swt gave you this opportunity. Take it don’t hesitate.
🥰
May Allah swt bless sayed Ammar till the day of resurrection
God bless Dr Sayed Ammar. I am deeply grateful to Allah for the profound blessing of being a Shia Muslim of Ahlulbayt.
The majority is not a sign of the truth.
If you obey most of those on the earth, they will lead you astray from the way of Allah. They follow nothing but conjectures and they do nothing but surmise. 6:116
Ali is with the Quran and the Quran is with ‘Ali. They will not separate from each other until they return to me at the [paradisal pool] (al-ḥawḍ).
Prophet Muhammad, (al-Hakim al-Naysaburi, Al-Mustadrak ‘ala’l-Sahihayn, Sahih Muslim 927, No. 4685)
110/786
"The majority is not a sign of the truth." Indeed, brother, indeed!
The French author Jean Giraudoux said in "La guerre de Troye n'aura pas lieu" "C'est à cela que l'on reconnaît l'erreur, elle est universelle !".
You can never be Mufti Menk even in Billion years. You Shias are very funny 😂
786
Down the road, it would be interesting to find out how many Sunnis were influenced by this incredible series and actually considered becoming Shii...
Shukar Mowla for these lectures! No doubt, Shii themselves benefit no end from them.
May Allah keep you humble, dear Sayed, and not allow all our compliments and "Ohhhs!" and "Ahhhs!" go to your head. Aameen.
Ok.
Finally I can resume watching where I left.. it went private for a nap 😅
Me too I was freaking out 😅
Same I thought someone brought it down 😅
@@Dub.wub121I wish
@@Dub.wub121Me too. I started to get angry.😂😂
@@Dub.wub121 😂🙌
55:55, what is said right here is trembling. exalted is lord Allah, worthy of all praises.
😮😮😮😮😮الهم صل على محمد وال محمد❤❤❤❤
الله آكبر...اسلام عليك يا ابو الحسن.
و عليك السلام
اشهد ان علی ولی الله ❤
SubhanAllah. ua-cam.com/users/shortsJqnNgkkMmP8?si=Ye5fP9FFjHQxIVpT
The truth, we need to realize the caliphs as mere politicians.
Mashallah Allah bless you
Phew late upload was disappointed thought i was going to have a boring night lol
Lol same
It's live everyday at 3:30 eastern time.
@@tawabturkmani1838I thawt sumbody else took it down. I played it jus a little after 3:30pm EST and next thing I know I cudn't find the video anywhere, but now its a really good night for sure. Allahu Akbar!!😂😂
😆Facts
I slept off waiting.
110/786
Vous avez parlé avec tant de passion, bètaa Sayed ! Votre douleur et votre peine étaient tout à fait perceptibles... Tout comme lors de certaines de vos présentations à Kalanpur, à Mombasa, à Naïrobi et à Toronto, il y a des années et des années de cela... Puisse Allah poser un baume sur votre coeur 💔brisé, cher enfant.
Avec mes meilleurs voeux,
Kanize
Bright faced people 🖤🤲🏾🕋☪️ #KhudaHafiz #AllahHafiz #AllahuAkbar
muft menk insult imam ALI by saying he go to give baiya to abu bakar with half of his clothes on
Astagfarallah
May allah curse mufti menk
31:06 I just cannot stop laughing 😂😂😂 at Dr. Ammar's Reaction 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Thumbs Up 👍🏼 If like me you had to replay it multiple times to enjoy the reaction 😅😅😅
We also won’t stop laughing when you be burning in hell. His recitation is great and beautiful. When your ass have nothing to say and slammed with truth and facts this is what you say.
Also you should 14:22 and apply this donkeys logic there too I can even think that about imam Ali AS I can’t imagine where from you get this courage .
Notice how the Arabic says Wali at 16:05 (ولي), and translates to sucessor for Abu Bakr, but when we say Wali for Imam Ali, they say it means 'friend'. Double standards😅...
Indeed, you are worthy to emulate by we the students of Knowledge of Islam.
These English books you are using as references relay want you to help me access them.
Wow
31:07 - 31:11
Pure, 24K, our of a river sanded down polished to perfection by the hands of a 197 year old master: GOLD
14:22
Why was the original 'realsed' video made private? It is exactly the same footage, right? Did something happen perhaps?
Can anyone provide a good website or link where we can access these hadiths online if we can’t get hands on physical copies? JazakAllah
Should be able to find pdf
Search “ bukhari PDF “ Muslim PDF
InshaAllah the truth will be seen the people, and that day will the saddest day for Muslim uma 😢
Crimes of umr & Abu abkar are not hidden
- Sahih al-Bukhari 6725, 6726
.. Therefore Fatima left Abu Bakr and did not speak to him till she died ....
- Nabi pbuh said in Sahih al-Bukhari 3714,"Fatima is a part of me, and he who makes her angry, makes me angry."
- Umar abu bakar died without Fatima forgiveness they died kafir.
Tidak ada subtitle Indonesia
If an individual cannot make sense of the situation as a whole then it would be fair to say that denial has become your companion...
It is plainly obvious that in order to TAKE one had to CUT-OFF all and any roads to ownership... in terms of strategy one has to hand it to the main brains of Saqifa. He/they played it very crafty indeed. The thing about "inheritance" would have been quite ingenious at the time, not so today but it worked absolute wonders... the point I'm trying to make is that there was an obvious campaign to ostracise the direct family. Nothing was spared. From invention to violence everything was used to gain the upper hand and why not? It was 'make or break' for whoever wanted to claim the thrown...
Enough of trying to hide behind a so-called 'fear of offence' that prevents a man or woman from speaking the truth. Regardless of one's denial the truth of any matter cannot EVER CHANGE.... God knows what this brothers true motives are but all I can hear from him here is facts and the plain truth!
As a matter of fact we heard it from the horses mouth. Can there be anything better?!
Our God is an All-knowing and Merciful God who keeps inviting His People to believe in the Bigger scheme of His Plan. And whatever has happened in the past is for people to believe
in this Bigger scheme of His Plan for His People. Blaming others is not the answer to any problems. We have to change our way of thinking from a tunnel vision to the Bigger Scheme of God's Plan! Disagreements have happened from the beggining of time. Since then people have moved on for the betterment of their selves, country and it's people. God has been on the side of these people.
To call urself the follower of Hazrat Ali and imams one has to keep them in front of u as an example in whatever u do. As many of the imams have said " if you do not follow us in our examples then you are not one of us".
Just giving lip service does not mean someone is a follower of Hazrat Ali who had good Akhlaq and did not goad and be provocative for anyone to be his follower. How did it make u a better human being by calling yourselves follower of Hazrat Ali and the imams ???
Can you do an episode where u talk about latmia, all of sunnis say we hit ourselfs and that’s haram
Listen to me you sonni muslim enough is enough keep away from anyone that praises abobak omar aisha vallah you will not see Jana you think someone like omar that attacked the house of dauther of your prophet and made her miscarriage her baby is going to jana stop falling yourself stop listening to guys like mufti these are the descendent of Bavaria you will not see Jana
It's a false story. Stop believing that nonsense
The ads in these videos are an absolute travesty. It's like dirt flung on Eid clothes. I cannot imagine one single person being convinced to donate a dime.
Still they will not accept the truth
32:04 Mola (AS) Calling ibn kuhafa to him clearly shows Who is the leader the king appointed by Almighty ALLAH... Sunni books are the reason I converted... ALLHUMDULILAH i read them by myself...
Don't read books with biased mind
@@Mer_67556 i didn’t i read them with having love for Rasul ALLAH (SAWA) and knowing He has more right on my nafs than i have on myself... if Rasul ALLAH had this right then Sayeda Fatima(SA) has it too because she will be my leader in jannah (inshaAllah) That’s it
@@Mer_67556 do u think it is easy for a Muslim to find out what Abu bakar and Umar had done to Rasul ALLAH (SAWA) and Syeda (SA) and Mola (AS) ?? I was unfortunate I grew up adoring I wept for them... but no one is more dear to than ALLAH’s messenger ...
@@sumnbleenqazi I understand that there were disagreements between Fatima (RA) and Abu Bakr (RA), Umar (RA), but I believe you might be exaggerating the situation. It's essential not to view historical events in absolutes; they are often more nuanced than that.
@@Mer_67556😂😂😂😂
If Imam Ali had auch bad opinion of the two then why did he serve them for 12 years? And serve the third for another 12?
He served Islam not them, which included omar almost taking a life of a woman during his forced Khilafah, Thanks to Mola Ali that he saved her .
If you think why he didnt go on war with them the reason is lack of army when he had army at a time, he crushed Mauvia(LA) and Ayesha
@@zaminabbas2510 Typical nonsense response. Mola that lacks an army. He served Islam so then they were on the right path if he served Islam under them and didn't object. If they were on the wrong path and he kept quiet for fear then that's another story. Which is it? He saved the life of "a" woman? "A" woman? that's an accomplishment?
@@omarmalik1797 brother all discussions aside with due respect, when Prophet(pbuh) said : im leaving you behind two heavy things Quran and Ahle bait , dont go against them , and they are the path to guidance ,
There is no space of any other claiming khilafa
You used the word Mola
Mola means The leader (Aqa,sardar)
Mola Ali is sardar and Aqa of all three khalifs and mauviah and the wifes too
Their khilafah is nullified Saqifah was regretted by abubakr and umar accepted that Ali considered him oppressor cheater and sinner.
Mola Ali despite not getting worldy khilafah is still a Mola and he did his duty to save Islam whenever needed weather its wrong decisions of khalifas or any help ,
One more thing Mola Ali didn’t receive respect from ahle madinah and makkah and thats why lacked in army when he had he made hell for them in siffin and jamal
References ill mention,
whatever i said is not my words
Is sahih ahadees
Sahih muslim v4 p1873 tradition#36
Sahih muslim 1757
Ahmed bin Hanbal al-musnad vol.1 p119
Woman life that he saved you think is a small thing omar blame her of adultery
Sunan Abi Dawud 4399
@@omarmalik1797 the so called abu sufyan which you sunni revere the most offered allegiance to imam ali and wanted pay attention to sayed ammar words he says abu sufyan offered to raise an whole army for imam ali to fight abu bakr still he didn’t fight because he was concerned for islam . Moreover these are your books and if you have a doubt regarding your own books bro than you seriously need to confirm your identity ( poor one )
@@kausarbohra6168 The FACT is Bukhari has a collection of hadiths and has some questionable hadiths and these books have been tampered with and such invented hadiths do exist.
Sahih Muslim has even larger share of unauthentic hadiths, and other books are even at lower level of authenticity.
These unauthentic hadiths have caused a lot of damage to Islam. they have been a major reason of various misunderstandings in various matters of the religion over past many centuries, not to mention the fuel they provide to the enemies and haters of Islam to ridicule Islam.
The enemies of Islam quote hadiths from books (even if it’s called sahih) on the pulpit that today will be regarded as fake news. There were no xerox machines in those days and honestly any intelligent person knows how hadiths were written by hand and there was plenty of opportunities to tamper with them to suit their own agenda. Btw just saying one is a shia of Ali does not make one so unless they have good akhlaq like the Prophet and his progeny.
Thank God I'm not one of them that are pleased with all sides of an argument. This is called eternal dissonance, if anything.
Now they have nowhere to hide 😅
Who did your tats?
Ramadan is a month of reflection and a time where we are ordered to re focus on our deen. So an analysis of those who transmit the practices of the prophet, rather than sectarian or divisive, is actually of utmost importance. An analyses of who we emulate i.e. who we take as role models is of utmost importance. An analysis of the actions of those who lived during the time prophets and the circumstances surrounding their actions is of utmost importance. The actions of those same individuals after the prophet dies and their treatment of one another is of utmost importance.
The sunni claims that they follow the sunnah of the prophet as transmitted by the companions. And the shia claims that they follow the sunnah of the prophet as transmitted by the prophet's family.
The shia disagrees with the sunni as to who the genuine companions of the prophet are based on the criticisms of those same companions by God himself in the Quran and an assessment of their actions towards one another. The sunni disagrees with the Shia by noting that shia isnads dont necessarily go directly back to the prophet himself and that God himself also praises the companions in the Quran.
The Shia counter argues that individuals blessed/guided by God wouldnt do anything that the prophet would disallow. The quran and sunni hadiths are quoted to establish those who are blessed. They also note that God inspiring someone doesn't make them a prophet, again quoting Quran. They also note that Ali ibn Abu Talib was not only a member of the household of the prophet but also one of the first companions to embrace islam. They also note that many hadiths are reports of the companions commenting on the actions and decisions of the prophet and then those same companions allowing or disallowing the opposite of what the prophet allowed or disallowed. They also state that being praised for an action at one time in a persons life doesn't protect them from justified criticism at another time in that same persons life.
The sunni counter argues by saying that the shia only presents the most negative of opinions possible. They also note that many of the sunni hadiths mentioned by the shia are considered weak (by some historians amd scholars). They also mention that many Shia hadith are considered weak by shia themselves.
The shia notes that if two groups of people argue or fight or kill each other then regardless pf who's companions they are everybody cant be rightly guided, every violent act cant be a mistake, and that its not logically possible that they all loved one another. They not that the Quran i.e. the word of God mentions that the prophet is surrounded by hypocrites, and that those hypocrites would not simply up and disappear once the prophet died. They also note that companions, family members and wives of past prophets have also been punished by God. So they return the sunnis question of why would God allow the prophet to remain married any woman who had evil in their heart. They also note that many of the opinions that they are presenting arent own words but literally the contents of the hadith i.e. person A did not wish for person B to come to their home accompanied by person C. They note that person A not liking person C seems to be the logical conclusion.
That is very useful information but what are you exactly trying to say here?
@@infinitewisdom4557 its mostly a reply to individuals who say such discussions cause fitna. Its also an attempt at a balanced look at both perspectives for new muslims and muslims who are searching although i am shia.
@@haqqulyakeen4661 responding to the wrong comment?
@@jellooooooooo10 Yes, sorry
@@haqqulyakeen4661 its all good. Mistakes happen.
To all you sonni muslim just imagin you come out and say you do not belive in abobakr omar aisha any more what do you think will happen your family disown you and you lose your friend and job and that you can not afgord so hold on to this short life because vallah i know you will never see jana give me a breal omar attack the house of dauther of rasoullaha and you priase him and you think you are a muslim and going to jana really really good luck
Time to cancel Mufti Menk 😂
Here is what was asked to Abū Jaʿfar and his son Jaʿfar (Al-Ṣādiq) about Abū Bakr and ʿUmar, so he replied, “O Sālim, love and ally yourself with them, and dissociate yourself from their enemy, for they were imāms of guidance.” Then he said, “O Sālim, would a man revile his own grandfather? Abū Bakr is a grandfather of mine. May the intercession of Muḥammad ﷺ not reach me on the Day of Resurrection if I do not love and ally myself with them and disassociate from their enemy.”
Fiqh al-Shia” vol 3 pg 126, also in “Mabani Minhaj al-Saliheen” vol 3 pg 250 by Taqi al-Qummi.
If Abu Bakr and 'Umar were so bad Why did the prophet pbuh marry their daughters and keep them as his companions his whole life, Allah revealed the munafiqeen to the Prophet pbuh so he would of been aware of their faith but yet he was close to them.
Also abu bakr and umar the pbuh's inlaws. They were family, family are different they speak to each other different.
'Ali had sons named abu bakr and umar.
Ja'ffar al Sadiq was a descendent of Abu Bakr.
The shia are a mushrik, hate cult created by the jews to create fitna with in islam.
Wake up, islam is praying to non other than Allah alone, following the path of the prophet according to the narrations of the ahlul bayt and sahaba.
There is no mention of the belief in 12 imams in the quran, the status of Ali and hussein.
We are comanded to worship Allah and follow the messenger, to get to jannah thats it.
Do not be misguided by this sect or any other sect other than the sunnah.
To all sonni muslim and I will not call you my brother because anyone disrespecting my prophet and praise abobakr omar aishavis not a muslim brother of mine vallahe you will not see Jana so keep praying means nothing
Do not say that. The main reason prophet Muhammad came was to heal the sick and give eyes to those who lost theirs.
Abu bakr was there for Muhammad PBUH when Ali RA was just a baby. And when barely anyone was there for him. May Allah SWT bless the Sahaba. Wallahi, you will never be as much as a single hair of Omar RA and Abu bakr RA
@@AbdullahArguer
Your hero Umar loved alcohol. All in your books. And don’t make me list Hadiths about Abu bakr
Sunan Abu Daud Book 26, Number 3707:
"I knew that the Apostle of Allah (pbuh) used to keep fast. I waited for the day when he did not fast to present him the drink (nabidh), which I made in a pumpkin. I then brought it to him while it fermented. He said: Throw it to this wall, for this is a drink (Alcohol) of the one who does not believe in Allah and the Last Day"."
Ahl'ul Sunnah's classical work Riyadh al Nadira Volume 2 page 351:
"Whilst on his deathbed, Umar Ibn Khattab became deeply affected by the wound and his physician asked Umar 'Which alcohol would you like to drink?' Umar said 'alcohol called nabidh is my preferred choice. This drink was then administered to Umar
Umar Ibn Khattab continued to drink alcohol under the name of “wine”, and the Sunni’s narrations are plentiful on this issue. As an example, Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi narrates the following of Anas, son of Malik, who said:
The most beloved food to Umar was ‘Thafl’, and the most beloved drink to him was wine. Kanz-ul-Ummal, by Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, volume 12, page 626
He was an immense lover of wine. Once he was given wine made from raisins, so he called for water and poured it on the wine, and he drank it. Then he said:
The wine ofAl-Ta’if is fantastic! Al-Mabsout, by Al-Sarkhasi, volume 24, page 8
Umar used to justify his drinking of wine by saying that it helps to digest the camel-meat. Al-Bayhaqi narrates on the authority of Amru, son of Maymoun, who said:
(Hadith states as follows Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: “I drink a wine that cuts through the flesh of the camel within my stomach so that it will not hurt us! Sunan al-Bayhaqi, Volume 8, page 299
Umar used to invite people claiming that drinking alcohol strengthens the backbone and helps digestion! He used to say:
Drink this wine in these vessels, for indeed, it strengthens the backbone and digests whatever is in the stomach, and it will not subdue you as long as you find water! Kanz-ul-Ummal, by Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, volume 5, page 522
@@AbdullahArguerye ye keep talking nonsense
@@iamwahabi not non sense its just facts cry about it Abu Bakr RA is the greatest man to ever live besides the prophets of Allah SWT
Alhamdola of Islam and the Sunnuh. Rafidah Shia are the example of what happens when Muslims innovate and commit Shirk. Inshallah we make DUA for them to come to Islam.
A Brief Summary of Shia Teachings
"After the death of the Prophet, peace be upon him, all the Companions apostatized, so neither the Qur'an collected by them was reliable, nor the hadiths narrated by them. And the twelve Imams remained taqiyyah throughout their lives and did not tell anyone directly, so their Neither word is reliable." It is difficult to understand whether Shiism is a religion or atheism
Shiisim is not hard to understand brother.
1) Did the Imams of the Ahlulbayt perform Taqiyya? Ans. Imam Ali (AS) was martyred in a mosque. Imam Hassan (AS) was poisoned. Imam Hussain (AS), his family and blessed
companions were martyred on the battlefield of Kerbala. All of the Imams after Hussain (AS) were imprisoned and poisoned. Does it sound like they performed Taqiyya?
Taqiyya is hiding your faith if your life is in danger and can only be done if you are being prosecuted. E.g someone points a gun at you and asks if you are a muslim or not and you say No to save yourself. Allah know what is inside you heart.
In Quran 16:106
“He who disbelieves in Allah after his belief in Him, (is the liar) except he who is compelled while his heart remains steadfast with the faith (has nothing worry). But who opens his breast for infidelity; on these is wrath of Allah, and for them is a great torment.”
This verse of the Qur’an refers to the incident when 'Ammar bin Yasir (May Allah be pleased with him) had to utter some words against Islam to save himself from the Quraishite infidels. It clearly allows hiding one 's true faith when one is in danger of one's life. This rule is called taqiyyah
And Below is a link that talks about the Shia view on the completeness of The Holy Quran. www.al-islam.org/shiite-encyclopedia/belief-shia-completeness-quran
Exceot that is not what the Shia believe.
Meanwhile Sunnis believe the prophet was suicidal, bewitched, and learns his religion from the jews. That Allah has a face we will be able to see, two rights hands, and a shin he will uncover. Is this Islam or polytheism?
that's literally not what shias believe it's just what you made up
😂🤣All the Imams were killed by sword or poison and he says that the Imams did taqqiya all their lives.
Spreading lies and misinformation was the specialty of the ummayads and now It has been inherited by these nasibis.
Idk what anyone says I think Ali conspired with those people that killed Uthman
امام علو مو طرطور مرته تتمالخ مع الزلمه😅.
❤ ALI IBN ABI TALIB ❤
Very sad, batil pathway
40:52 if the Shia were from the birds, they would be vultures 😅
So what you gonna do, I don’t know what you wanna do 🐥
Abubakar and Umar Alayhumas Salaam
Sending peace on the inhabitants of hell who caused oppression to the Prophet (saw) and his holy household is not permitted by Allah(swt). Denial is a disease seek help.
*LA
LA
Wanna be Muslim page
Shia is not muslim BTW
Yeah only your version of Islam is right. Don’t you feel special.
Very strange he has to use sunni scholars pictures as click bait thumbnails to get people interested in watching😆😆😆.. What a desperado.. Clout chaser
Anything to ignore the content huh?
@@rcmysm9123 ... To ignore an ignorant, unqualified (wouldnt even term him a scholar), hatred igniting, individual who is trying to make a living for himself.. Take it from me, hes misinterpreting every hadith from the sunni books, either intentionally or unintentionally due to him being a jahil, totally uneducated and unqualified..God will judge him
He actually did this because he is refuting the claims of that scholar. Have you even watched the video?
He responds to clips of the sunni brother in his video so its not clickbait. This is not the first video that he has done this.
Ye ye keep talking nonsense
As a Sunni, and convert, i think that this series most defenitely shows that the Shia pad is a pad of darkness, the way hé interpreted the story from the book of Jihad is only logical to a Shia. Two people came and hé concludes that Umar said it to Ali 😂
What are you talking about??
Sahih Muslim 4577 clearly mentions that Umar was talking to Hazrat Ali and Hazrat Abbas.
".......Then he turned to Abbas and 'Ali and said: I adjure you both by Allah by Whose order the heavens and earth are sustained, don't you know that the Messenger of Allah ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) said: We do not have any heirs; what we leave behind is (to be given in) charity ? They (too) said: Yes. (Then) Umar said: Allah, the Glorious and Exalted, had done to His Messenger ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) a special favour that He has not done to anyone else except him. He quoted the Qur'anic verse: What Allah has bestowed upon His Apostle from (the properties) of the people of township is for Allah and His Messenger . The narrator said: I do not know whether he also recited the previous verse or not. Umar continued: The Messenger of Allah ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) distrbuted among you the properties abandoned by Banu Nadir. By Allah, he never preferred himself over you and never appropriated anything to your exclusion. (After a fair distribution in this way) this property was left over. The Messenger of Allah ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) would meet from its income his annual expenditure, and what remained would be deposited in the Bait-ul-Mal. (Continuing further) he said: I adjure you by Allah by Whose order the heavens and the earth are sustained. Do you know this? They said: Yes. Then he adjured Abbas and 'All as he had adjured the other persons and asked: Do you both know this? They said: Yes. He said: When the Messenger of Allah ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) passed away, Abu Bakr said: I am the successor of the Messenger of Allah ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ). Both of you came to demand your shares from the property (left behind by the Messenger of Allah). (Referring to Hadrat 'Abbas), he said: You demanded your share from the property of your nephew, and he (referring to 'Ali) demanded a share on behalf of his wife from the property of her father. Abu Bakr (Allah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allah ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) had said: We do not have any heirs; what we leave behind is (to be given in) charity. So both of you thought him to be a liar, sinful, treacherous and dishonest. And Allah knows that he was true, virtuous, well-guided and a follower of truth. When Abu Bakr passed away and (I have become) the successor of the Messenger of Allah ( صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ) and Abu Bakr (Allah be pleased with him), you thought me to be a liar, sinful, treacherous and dishonest...."
Clearly you can't read or maybe you just choose not to understand.
"Indeed, it is not the eyes that are blind, but it is the hearts in the chests that grow blind."
At 23:00 what Ammar doesn't realize in his olive brain is that Imam Ali agreed with Umar regarding the property and how it's meant for charity. And also, just because of a small disagreement Imam Ali did not start building shrines and committing shirk. In fact he gave his daughter in marriage to Umar Ibn Al-Khattab.
Ye ye bro … keep talking nonsense
@@iamwahabi Did Imam Ali give his daughter in marriage to Umar? And was Fadak not meant for charity even Imam Ali agreed? And did Imam Ali start building shrines and commit shirk or slap himself? ... Tell me which part is nonsense?
@@samcorrityne1433we get it you Hate to see us mourn and show love for our ahlulbayt as.. now go on and continue to love the enemies
@@samcorrityne1433 dont worry just believe in what you want and love and follow who you want… do me a favour mind your own business and just watch your dumb sheikhs and their bullcrap speeches instead watching Sayed Ammar demolishing your sect into pieces…😏
@@samcorrityne1433All of it is nonsense you didn't listen to lecture did you.
See how Imam Ali described the caliphate of Abu Bakr & Umar the damage they did. Their charity was looking after their buddies and paying off their hatchmen.
No follower of Imam Ali accepts your nonsense.
This cowboy wouldn't last 5 min Infront of a real Sunni scholar, the likes of late khadim Hussain rizvi.
Mola Ali (ra) has 14 sons... 1) Abubakr 2) Umer & Usman amongst them... Mola Ali's daughter married to Umer.....
Lanatullahi allel kazibeen
There is no issue with the names, but there is an issue with individual people. The one who killed Imam Ali (as) was called Abdul Rahman. That is a great name but the man who killed Imam Ali (as) was a horrible person. That doesn't mean I shouldn't use the name.
The prophet (s) married the daughter of his enemy Abu Sufyan (la), does that mean we should respect him?
It is not clear if this was the daughter of Imam Ali (as) or the daughter of Abu Bakr who both had daughters with the same names.
😂😂😂😂 Read and learn don’t just listen to your mufti.
This is peak sunni intelligence counterargument. If names , reassure you that that's great, but history still recorded abu bakr and omar in different lights 😂
It makes perfect sense you’re cursing yourself.
Al-Tirmidhi, who died during the year 279. He said in his book: «We were told by Saleh, son of Abdullah al-Tirmidhi: We were told by Al-Faraj, son of Fadhala, Abu-Fadhala al-Shami, of Yahya, son of Sa'eed, son of Mohammad, son of Amru,(NOT UMAR) son of Ali, son of Abi-Talib…This text was falsified by the Nawasib through which they changed his name to "Umar" in some editions.
Imam Ali named his son Uthamn after his friend Uthman bin Madghon (NOT IBN AFAN ) according to narrations by Ahl Al Byt (as). Another narration can be found in "Maqtal Al Hussain (A.S)" when it talks about Uthman going down to the battle. Also review: "Maqatel Al Talbeen" by Ibn Farj Al Asfahani (p 55). Let me know if you need more sources for that.
Mohammad, son of Omar al-Waqidi, who died during the year 207 (Hijri). He said: «The lineages of the offspring from of Imam Ali's sons were from five of them: Hassan, and Hussain, and Mohammad, son of al-Hanafiya, and Abbas, son of al-Kalabiya, and Amru, son of Al-Taghlabiya.»
Source: Tareekh al-Tabari, volume 3, page 163, edition of Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiya, Beirut, year 1407 (Hijri). Inthe edition of Dar-ul-Masadir, it is volume 3, page 940.
As for the distortion of the name of Mohammad al-Asghar (meaning Mohammad, the Minor), and then changing his nickname to Abu Bakr, and then changing his name itself to Abu Bakr, Dr. Najah al-Ta’i says that there were three stages in which the alteration of the name of Mohammad, the smaller, was changed: first: mentioning Mohammad al-Asghar without his supposed nickname; second: mentioning his real name and adding his supposed nickname; third: making Mohammad al-Asghar become one person and making Abu Bakr become another person.
when the Umawis and the Bakri scholars noticed that Imam Ali (may peace be upon him) had a son named Uthman, and after they had altered the name of ”Amru” into Umar they tried with all efforts to include the name of Abu Bakr into the sons of Imam Ali (may peace be upon him), and this explains the confusion that was arised about this fabricated personality!
Some of them said that the name of ”Abu Bakr”, son of Ali, was Mohammad al-Asghar.
Sources:
• Al-Tanbeeh wal-Ashraf, by Al-Mas’oudi, page 258
• Tathqeef al-Umma bi-seerat Awlad-ul-A’imma, by Haydar al-Mu’ayyad, page 73
• Al-Amda, by Ibn Batreeq, page 30, edition of Mu’assasat Ahlul-Bayt, Beirut
• Al-Irshad, by Al-Mufid, volume 1, page 354
• Kifayat-ul-Talib, by Al-Kanji al-Shafi’i, page 446
• Al-Fusul-ul-Muhimma, by Ibn al-Sabbagh, page 139
You just did lanat on yourself not brightest spark are you. Abu Bakr was kunya not his name. Uthman was named after another asahabi a friend of imam Ali Uthman mad'oon.
No imam Ali daughter didn't marry Umar. The alleged daughter would have been 3 or 4 years old. The hadith you are using makes Umar to be prevert because he requested to touch her up before hand according to your hadiths.
Our scholars don't accept it
What this is helping you gain??? Is it strengthening your taqwa or elevating your darjaaz.. this is just negative energy being burned during a blessed month of Ramadan.. trying to completely wash off the good done by Abu Bakr (ra) and Umar ibn kattab (ra).. there must have been a rift or sour relations, Allah hu alam.. but each of the four caliphs and companion prophets.. are gem of people and their contributions to spreading of Islam is what has served the message of Prophet Muhammed (saws) to almost 2 billion ppl today and winning even Persia and converting them to the right path.. you trying only keep the divide ignited..
Facts are facts
......
facts = facts, doesn't matter if you accept it or not
We could argue that if Islam was governed by and in the hands of Ahlulbayt(as) probably most of the world would be Muslim.
It is our belief that the Mahdi (as) who is from Ahlulbayt (as) will be the one to make that happen.
Truth hurts, doesn't it?!
Definitely I am gaining true knowledge of Islam, and not what I have been hearing from Aalims in majority mosques……
It's apparent that all he discusses during Ramadan is sectarian hatred, which goes against the essence of our religion. He rarely discusses religious matters and instead fixates solely on sectarianism. Despite the immense contributions of Umar (RA) and Abu Bakr (RA) to Islam, he only seeks out negativity about them to defame their legacies. This scholar is a fraud and a hatemonger, and it's shameful.
Name me 10 contributions of abu bakr and umar except them adding biddahs and changing shariah laws for everything. You name their 10 contributions ill name 100 sacrifices of ahlulbayt
He is strictly using Sunni books for very important topics in my opinion. When he says Shia you all say sectarian lol!!!
Such a hater you are! lol. You mean Dr. Sayed Ammar Nashkawani could teach all your mullah muftis!
So, you're telling me it's ok for Muhammad Hijab, Ali Dawah, Assim Al Hakeem or the troves of other non-Shia channels to portray their interpretation of Islam, even though the Shia find that viewpoint absolutely abhorrent, but if a Shia explains the Shia viewpoint using Sunni literature, it's promoting sectarianism?
When Hijab, Dawah, Al-Hakeem et al relish in promoting hatred of the Shia at every given opportunity, your comment has no basis and is catagorically rubbish.
When it comes to the contributions of Abu Bakr and Umar to Islam - was calling our holy Prophet pbuh delusional a good contribution to Islam? Was usurping the caliphate of Imam Ali as at saqifa a good contribution to Islam? After all, that shows that Abu Bakr and Umar ran away to saqifa before and during the burial of Prophet Muhammad saw shows their disdain of our Prophet. Is angering Sayeda Zahra as a good contribution to Islam? Is creating and promoting Bidah such as Tarawih a good contribution to Islam?
One ayat of the Quran comes to mind that you and your ilk epitomise... "Indeed, it is not the eyes that are blind, but it is the hearts in the chests that grow blind." - 22:46
If you get triggered by these videos why do you watch them? He is not being sectarian at all.
What he is doing is simply showing us what has been mentioned in Sunni literature which Sunni scholars tend to not discuss on the pulpit.
If you do not like what these particular narrations that have been mentioned in books like Sahih Bukhari, the Musannaf, the Musnad, etc are saying then is that a Sayed Ammar issue or is that your own issue with what you believe in bcs now you have to deal with or reconcile this internal conflict that you have?
At the end of the day we need to be true to ourselves. Ask yourself, are you willing to give up everything that you thought was true for the actual truth?
If not then your sincerity is to be questioned. Not by me or anyone else but for your own self.
We are all gonna face our Lord, do we want to return to Him having denied the blatant truth found in both Sunni and Shia sources?
We lose nothing for holding on to the Qur'an and the Ahlulbayt. But if you take your Islam from any and every sahabi when there is no command to do that, then there is a possibility of going astray since there is no doubt that there were disagreements between them.
You want to carry on with your unwarranted love for Abu Bakr and Umar then that is your freedom to do so.
I see no reason to do so and I don't lose anything by disassociating myself from them since Rasulullah (s) left the Qur'an and Ahlulbayt (as) for us and that is sufficient for me.
At the very least, I can say those 2 were not the cream of the sahaba. They were nowhere near the likes of Yassir, Sumaya, Salman, Abu Dhar, Ammar, Bilal and their likes.
Be true to yourself.
Why doesn't the Syed accept the invitation to a debate with Adnan Rashid, Farid and the likes
Because his job isn’t to debate. He is a lecturer. Secondly, you can’t compare those men’s knowledge to Sayed Ammar‘s knowledge. Ammar has been lecturing for over 2 decades and has multiple Islamic degrees, including studying in the Middle East. He isn’t going to debate someone who is on a lower level of knowledge.
Farid? I am not even a lecturer or a scholar and I very simply proved farid very wrong on my channel.
He makes apple to oranges analogies and dedicated his channel to “responding” and not even teaching. He just debates points all day after someone with real knowledge makes claims.
He should stick to David wood responses. With all due respect. Salam to farid. But he reaches so far
@@BigAck exactly, when Sunnis watch Ammar‘s lectures they expect him to provide evidence for everything single thing he says. They don’t understand he’s gone and read all the history. Also his initial target is Shias, so Sunnis need to stop feeling like they have to have evidence for every single fact Ammar gives.
Adnan Rashid is too arrogant n impatient in debates- mocks n laughs often. i think there should be a worthy calm opponent
@@hashh2019 yeah the guy screams at everyone. Always ads “destroyed” in his titles. And sides with muawya and yazid. Not even worth speaking to. Let him dig his own grave