Why You Shouldn't Use a 4K TV as a Computer Monitor
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 лип 2024
- A 4K TV will work as a computer monitor but if you choose the wrong one you'll end up with an inferior experience. Specifically you'll want to watch out for chroma subsampling and input lag.
If you're curious about all the product mentioned, links are below:
Vizio 40" 4K TV amzn.to/2hWwEUo
BenQ BL3201PH 32" 4K Monitor amzn.to/2hIDmN7
LG UH6100 43" 4K amzn.to/2hWwEUo
Sony X700D 4K amzn.to/2hIQdyS
Samsung KU6300 amzn.to/2igPhPp
*I'm still using an old Panasonic Plasma TV because they are still awesome.
------------------------
Learn about 4:4:4 / 4:2:2 / 4:4:4 chroma subsampling here:
• Ask Alex - The 411 on ...
rtings.com is a great website that compares and measures all these specifications. Measurements provided in this video were from that website.
------------------------
Intro - JPB - High [NCS Release]
• JPB - High | Trap | NC...
/ jpb
Background - Soul Catalyst - Solstice
• [Chill] Soul Catalyst ...
/ catalyst-11
► For More Awesome Gear ◄
Subscribe - bit.ly/1Uzynun
Twitter - / mrdavidzhang
My Video Gear - bit.ly/davidzhangyt - Навчання та стиль
*For anyone who is too lazy to watch the whole video:*
- You CAN use a 4K TV as your computer monitor (most people won't even notice the problems)
- The main issues to consider are 4:4:4 Chroma Subsampling & Input Lag
- Not all TVs have these issues, some are perfectly acceptable as monitors if you don't mind the size
- The important point is that you are aware so you can identify and research on your own
lol. you people are funny but it's good to try and keep everything honest.
Misleading video title.
Interesting review, which I found useful. Having just gone through the same analysis after purchasing a Vizio D50u-D1, I would have enjoyed seeing this before my purchase, but I must underline that the 4:2:0 chroma still keeps the full resolution in black and white, so not an issue for reading most text (black on white, or white on black). You lose resolution in the color channels only.
I'm literally watching your example of input lag and I don't see what you're talking about. I
Input lag is hard to see... it is the delay between you doing something and seeing it.... It is more noticeable when you have the mouse in your hand. I have a gaming desktop and PC's hooked to tv's. There is a very big delay on a tv. Not suitable for high-end gaming.
David Zhang You are forgetting one of the biggest reasons why gamers chose a PC monitor over getting a TV, and that is pixel response time. The LG OLED TV's are excellent (0.1-0.3 ms) and some select few LCD's such as the Samsung JU6400 (6.8 ms) are okay here, but...
Are you kidding!? The Samsung KU6300 is terrible as a PC monitor for anyone who wants to game! That is because it has a horrible 18.7 ms response time!
I'm a time traveler, I want to tell you that you'll be using an LG TV as a monitor in 2020
lmao this is golden
😂😂
*_PEEAS5_*
No I won't, I'm too poor
@@illiiilli24601 no, you won’t because it’s 2021
I have a 43 inch 4k TV for pc and it's amazing would never go back.
Fax i got a 4k smart tv for a monitor and it works better than any monitor i know
@@SpaceBeats24 So you recommend a tv over monitor. I just want to use it for work. Not game's. Any advice would be appreciated.
WHAT SHUT UP. MAN I WAS GETTING 1K FPS ON MY DEFAULT MONITOR THEN I CHANGED TO TV IT BECAME 300 FPS THEN I SWITCHED BACK TO MONITOR AND NOTHING HAPPENED ANYMORE. I TRUSTED THIS COMMENT SECTION AND TESTED MY TV FOR 3 DAYS AND MY PC BECAME 10X WORSE
btw the game is minecraft
@@Jabalabaxd you're not funny
I moved to 4k TV's as a replacement monitor and will never go back to a traditional PC monitor. The lag is in the real of negligible, the screen real estate is superb, game play is out of this world and as an editor, nothing come close for ease of use.
It's down to which TV you get, your PC's horsepower, your knowledge and budget - it's that simple!
UA-cam is awash with misinformation.
Thanks! I agree. Knowledge and research is always important.
David Zhang appreciate that you are acknowledging the need for research and knowledge. sadly however, headlines are frequently misappropriated for a use and it is concerning the same will happen here. it would have been excellent to have covered, for example, the difference between response times and input lag. too many people see a 1ms gaming vdu and compare that to the Samsung ks7500 input lag of 22ms for example. that input lag is amazing, but it doesn't stop the spouting of incorrect information.
You clearly have not played 21:9 with G-SYNC at 144Hz before. I own a reference TV and while the colors and size are very nice, even in game mode, there is no comparison in competitive gaming to the new widescreen monitors.
If you are not playing competitive game on TV then it the better option since you won't be bothered with input lag and most probably won't notice it.
Certain tv's run 120hz like a lot of sony bravias.
Dude I have to say your desk and living room setup is impeccable. So clean it's beautiful.
Thanks Ben!
What's the volume looking audio control solution on your desk? I've been looking for something like that. Thanks so much.
Even the cleaning bottles LOLOLOL
I have the Samsung 6300 that does 4:4:4 4K/60hz with low lag. It's not my primary PC display, but it works great as a monitor.
How is the text compered to monitor??
I'm on one right now, text looks fine, and it really looks like 4 1080p monitors when you make 200% zoom default on google. Works great for multitasking and the gaming experience is really immersive.
Just bought a 4K Samsung NU8500 that also does 4:4:4 and can even run at a native 120Hz @ 1440 & 1080p. Has excellent HDR color and great contrast too, but the best part of the TV is the input lag: 15.8ms @ 4K60, and 9.3ms @1440/1080p120! That's as good as any monitor. It even stays under 30ms when using motion interpolation, so you can basically have a smooth 120 FPS in every game, even if your PC struggles to pull that off on its own @ 4K. Hell, it even supports Freesync. All for under $1k for the 55" model (or $850ish if you're willing to buy an unused open box model).
@@Psythik Do you know if the NU8000 boasts similar performance?
Will the Samsung 6290 work too?
I play a couple videos, get up to make myself some tea, autoplay is on, this video starts to play...
Listening: 0:01 "This is a 32 inch monitor from BenQ. It costs *a* hundred dollars"...
I came running from the kitchen with the excitement of a 10yo boy on Christmas morning and went back in... disappointed...
oh well...
I caught that.....lol
I have the KU6300 and clicked on this video thinking "There is nothing wrong with using a 4K TV as a monitor". You made good points throughout and was happy to see you featured the TV I use.
I use a Sony XBR 43 inch 4:4:4 @ 60hz for a monitor. Initially there was input lag but I found a way around it. The trick to getting rid of input lag is to turn off all "TV" enhancements (motion blur, true image, etc...). The important setting to get rid of input lag significantly is to put the TV into "Game Mode". Pray that you have this setting!
I use a recent 49" 4K LG TV as a computer monitor, and I'm actually pretty happy with it. In high-paced FPS games input lag isn't that noticeable. It supports chroma 4:4:4 at 60Hz. I have it on my desk so I can sit in front of it and play games with mouse and keyboard, or I can lay back on my bed and watch movies or play games with a controller. Perfect setup for me personally.
LukeLane1984 i have a problem though... i get blank screen on streaming websites.. like sports stream... could be the resolution is too high?
Strange because some stream plays and some are choppy,, hmm
Is there any TV with 4k 120Hz at 4:4:4 and low input lag?
@@AS-bm5xv Not that I know of. Some TVs are advertised as having an "effective refresh rate" or "motion rate" of 120Hz or higher, but as far as I know they still use a 60Hz panel. Maybe some really really expensive, high end TVs use a true 120Hz panel, but at those prices you're better off just getting a large computer monitor.
@@LukeLane1984 What about the LG C9 and CX?
Just found your channel from the ultrawide vs dual monitor video. This video is really informative and well produced, and better than a lot of big channels out there. Keep up the awesome work, I'm looking forward to your future content!
Thanks man!
I use a LG OLED55B6P. I can't tell you enough how these points don't apply at all. Text is perfect. Colors amazing. And if there is input lag, I don't notice it at all.
For the input lag (if you notice it), it's probably due to the T.V. automatically setting your frame rates to 30 fps. This is so video gets a priority so it looks smoother in animation. To somewhat fix this, go to your display settings > Display Adapter Properties > on the top tab click on monitor > and select the refresh rate of 60 and click apply. In some cases (depending on your pc) this will revert to 59 Hertz.
Other problems with using a T.V. as a monitor are with games. Some games like to switch to 30 fps automatically because of what your T.V. is reporting to your graphics card. And that is a whole other topic.
I luv u
I'm a programmer and I've been using a 32" 4k tv as my main monitor for over a year and it works great. Never notice any input lag if it's there. A tv is fine, even better considering cost and size, if it makes sense with your setup and you're not concerned with minutia.
Where do you get 32" 4k TVs from?? All I can find is 1080p 32", 4k seems to start at 40"?
@@kadafi4lyf There is the Samsung Q50R. But it's avaiable only in a few countries, wich is a shame.
Just found your channel today, really dig your videos! Keep up the good work!
Thanks!
Great video David, I am really glad I saw this, I was thinking about going with a 4k tv.
Got a $400 Sceptre 49" 4k tv and use it as my computer monitor, as my pc is my work, gaming, and movie watching machine. Works fantastic, and couldn't be happier.
eh i bet you would be happier if you bought a samsung, 40" would have been same price or cheaper if you found it on sale
Thank you. Haven’t bought a new tv in 20 years :D so I haven’t kept up with the technology. I don’t watch tv. I’m a streamer or dvd watcher. But I think I’d like to have a larger monitor for sit back viewing as an extended desktop.
always enjoying your informative quality videos :) Happy holidays!
Happy holidays to you too!
I’m using a 40” Visio 4K V Series TV with my new Mac Mini - $219 at Sam’s. It’s stunningly beautiful! No lag, very responsive and text is clear and easy to read. Just need to add a camera and microphone. I don’t see any problems. It is amazing!
very useful video, thanks! saving money for a decent 4k monitor
TechLineHD just buy a decent 4K tv. They do have models with low input lag and chroma 4:4:4. All it takes is a little research.
I don't think David is saying TV is bad. It just that you need to pick the right one to use as a monitor. Recently, I needed a new monitor to replace my aging 21" Asus. I bought two 4k panels for comparison sake. One is Benq 32" and the other one is Sony X800D 43". They both produce sharp texts and there is no noticeable input lags at all. But when it comes to colour reproduction, Sony is far better than Benq even after calibration. And Sony covers 96% of DCI-P3 color space. In where I live, Benq is $200 more expensive than Sony. Needless to say, I returned Benq.
Tcl info 55 in
Sony xbr43x800d. 43", 4k, 4:4:4 Chroma, 60hz, somewhat low input lag and thin as fuck. You can read text perfectly at full resolution, game exceptionally well at 4k and tune it for an absolutely stunning image. I use 2 of them in a split setup off of the same desktop. I use one for pc sim racing and the other as a playback screen stacked on top of the 21:9 LG workflow monitor that I will be picking up next. I started with just one to see if I would like it and I did. So I gotta say it is actually really nice to have a 4k tv as a monitor.
EXTREME SCALE PERFORMANCE RC dude. YES! I have the exact same model and it's fucking amazing as a monitor. I had a bad experience with TV's as a monitor before, even small ones like 32". but I sit right in front of mine and it is amazing at 4k as a monitor. I have decent parts so it looks and runs great. text is very clear. if you haven't already you can make it look even better if you mess with the settings in graphics mode. also in windows look for the cleartext wizard. it makes text look even better. for anyone that wants to use this TV as a monitor I highly recommend it. the lag is very low and the Android TV features are fantastic.
EXTREME SCALE PERFORMANCE RC I own that TV and IT'S AMAZING. It does 4K@60, HDR, 4:4:4 Chroma, and has Android TV, a ton of inputs, and so on. The only downside is the built in speakers but a soundbar has fixed all of my issues.
EXTREME SCALE PERFORMANCE RC i can't wait to get that tv. its in my Amazon save for later list haha did you get it for around 600?
charleys tube don't know about that guy, but I got mine for $850 when it first came out. BUT it was and is still worth it imo. like the guy said above, the sound is the only bad part. get a sound bar, or computer speakers and you're good to go. (you gay actually used to the sound though) I use it for rocket league in 4k, so you know I need a good response time, refresh rate and input lag. the thing about this tv though is that you need to be under 60 fps in what ever games you play or it will cause screen tearing. so max out the game graphics to compensate. (you can't go over 60fps anyway since it's 60hz) if you don't game then you should be completely fine.
I've been looking into getting a 4k TV for PC gaming. However, I'm not sure whether getting a Sony is a good idea. Every manual that I've looked at for Sony 4k TV's says that it can only do 30 hz at 4k on PC through an HDMI connection. This is disappointing, considering how good the picture quality is on Sony TV's. In addition, I've also heard that input lag is an issue on Sony TV's, which wouldn't bode well for gaming.
That Vox video you showcased on the TV was just released. I'm impressed by how fast you make your videos!
lol. So perceptive!
Thanks for this. Since I already had a 4k tv I've just been using that for my monitor but it's good to know some of the benefits I may be missing
I still use my 32 inch bravia tv as pc monitor for almost 8 years !!!
And you very much need a upgrade your tv is stuck at 60hrtz while your pc can probably run like 144hrtz
My 4K 43 inch Sony Bravia is my main monitor and is amazing for everything, it can do RGB 8 Bit Full Range HDMI at 4K and every color format imaginable, it has a minute input lag, on par with my IPS monitor running at 60Hz, and thanks to it being 43 inches the pixel density is very high without being crushed, any smaller and the pixels would be entirely indistinguishable, which isn't always a good thing
not to mention my TV also does 1080p at 120Hz so I can switch to that if I want high Hz, and running at 1080p also gives more headroom for visuals at that high frame rate, and on top of that my TV can do 1:4 scaling meaning 1080p is perfectly scaled to 4K with no blur, it actually looks better than 1080p on a 1080p panel just because of the insane sharpness given by such a clean upscale, and the color and contrast is just far better on my TV than my monitor, not that either are bad but my TV gives much better contrast and better blacks, despite it only being IPS, it also has HDR support which is nice if I ever want to use it (I don't often) I just can't fault this TV it delivers on everything, it's the best monitor I've ever used and it isn't even a monitor
I do kind of wish I could do 1440p 120Hz on my TV like what I did on my monitor but 1080p with downsampling or good AA can look just as good
Thank you for posting this. The video was well done and very informative. Keep up the good work😊
Your explanations are on point sir! Nice job! :)
my dude, you trippin, 4k tv as a tv monitor is awesome.
I use my 24" 1080 TV as a monitor for a long time now. I mostly use it for office work: word documents, excel sheets etc. The text readability is fine. Lately, I tried to upgrade my monitor/TV and connect my PC to 32" 1080 HCL TV. I immediately noticed a problem: the text readability is immensely poor. On 24" screen 1080 pixels were showing fine, but on 32" size, there is obviously less amount of pixels for such size even though it is only 32. I tried to upscale the text size in settings in Windows, but the screen real estate drops dramatically. I cannot properly open two word files side by side and work because the text is too big and uncomfortable.
I think the solution is to get at least 2K TV for monitors larger than 27 for better work experience. If you are a gamer, I guess you will experience no problems with monitors larger than 27 on 1080. But for office work and text readability, get 2k or 4K for larger size TVs.
I'm planning on getting a 40 inch Samsung 4K HDR compatible TV when I get my gaming rig set up. It's refresh rate is about 120hz (might be 122hz, can't remember), though I don't know if it would lower in "gaming mode". But the thing is, I don't mind. I'd use it mainly for gaming, possibly for animating, and sometimes watching media, so I'm not worried about the loss of text fidelity. I have a laptop that works just fine if I need to create a word doc or browse the web. But hey, the day when a HDR compatible 4K monitor (hopefully OLED) with a decent refresh rate releases, I'll be all over it.
Great job on the video! It had the info I was looking for and was a great watch!
Look at him now, he's using a tv as monitor
My tv is literally the size of a monitor
I have this Samsung LED 3 series 20inch monitor..
Which I was not using for a 1 month..
Cuz I have good ips display laptop.
But Just Today I turn it on .... And see it is broken.. 💔😐😥😥
I bought it for $85 in 2013.
Bad ebening
@@nikhildeshmukh6851 ok unai emery
Well, if it has cable, then it's a deal
Been using TV's as monitors since LCD went mainstream.
First TV was a 32" 1080p Insignia with a VGA input in about 2007. The size alone made me never look back to those tiny inferior pc "monitors".
Upgraded to a 46" 1080p Insignia in about 2010 with yet another VGA input. Great experience again.
Next was a 55" Samsung 4k in 2014, one of the first ones ever out. I was stuck at 30hz until the DP to HDMI 2.0 adapters came out. But I still loved the experience.
Next was a 50" Samsung 4k, 4k had matured a bit so the picture was much better, especially the contrast and and blacks.
Now on a 55" Samsung 4k Q6F quantum dot TV. Just amazing. Everything I could ever ask for. Amazing color, amazing blacks, amazing motion for watching movies on my PC. Gaming with my 290x is also amazing.
Always had 4:4:4 chroma and never had any input lag on any of my TV's except when I was stuck at 30hz waiting for the adapters. Y'all are late to the party!
Thank you, this was the information I was looking for and so much more. I guess sticking to 2 different displays is better of, for me.
as someone who uses a 4k TV as a monitor, most of what you mentioned is pretty miniscule. the main reason that I think a 4k TV is a bad monitor is that (at least with my TV) the pixels are arranged in a hexoganal/ honey comb layout, rather than in rows. this makes all the sharp borders you are used to seeing on a monitor appear fuzzyer. also sitting only ~20 inches from the screen, the depth difference from the back light to the front panel is very noticibly when looking at an angle toward the corners of the screen. hence why they make curved TV's. however I will likely not ever go back to a standard computer monitor because I have gotten used to how much wonderful screen realestate that a 55inch screen at 4k offers. it is the equivalent of a 4 27inch 1080p monitor setup. being able to have 4 to 6 windows opened at once is a huge productivity booster.
do you know how to fix this?
How far back do you sit from the big screen
I bought a sony X700D 49" a month ago and im using it as my main monitor. I tought that i was going to have a hard time to addapt myself to it coming from a 23" 1080p monitor. But my godness! i could never go back to my old monitor. Input lag is something that i can't notice. Playing games like rocket league at native 4k is something incredible and more considering the color range of this tv with such a colorful game.
Something to take in consideration is that my 980ti is working 100% to give me 60fps and in games like fall out 4 it struggle to get 40 - 50 fps.
For reading text is just perfect at around 175% dpi scaling. And im using it at 60hz 4.4.4 or i should say RGB with Complete Dynamic range.
You should never go for a 4.2.0 TV for monitor. I tried it with that color setup and is horrible.
What does 4.2.0 mean?
I was actually thinking about this for a while, but did not consider the input lag factor. Thanks for clearing it out for me!
np! Glad it's helpful
David Zhang And could you make a video on why you chose Windows over macOS? That would be interesting.
we really need videos like this Mr Zhang nice work
Thanks for the video, but Can I still used 4k tv as monitor for music recording studio?
0:58 SUMMON FORTH THE UPSIDE DOWN BEAR!
A big thing you need to watch for is most TVs will not display 1:1 pixel mapping by default. They like to slightly scale the image for some dumb reason. This leads to blurry edges. You need to display an appropriate test pattern then go into settings to enable 1:1 pixel mapping. It is called many different things so I can't name the setting. You also need to make sure the TV even has this mode before buying.
Thanks for this informative video. I wasn't aware of these differences. All of your videos are very well done and your voice is perfect for narrating them. Keep up the great work.
I switched to a 40 inch Sony 4K tv for gaming and as a PC monitor and all I can say is that it looks awesome. I haven not had any issues. If you go too cheap on the TV than I think you will notice a bunch of things that make the experience not cool.
I’ve used my Bravia 4K 65” for 3 years now. I’ll never go back to using a pc monitor.
Personal prefrence I suppose
Sony Bravia had been flexible eversince. My parents bought new tv which is a Sony Bravia still...I ask them if I could just have our old LCD one as my pc monitor and it works smoothly :). Hahahaha
I would go back since very few TV have high refresh rate support.
I still use my 32 inch bravia tv as pc monitor for almost 8 years now
Does this affect eyes??monitors have shields right?
PC gaming on a 65inch 4KTV is badass! Also there is 4:4:4 Chroma support and low input lag if you stay away from budget TVs. 1400+ nits of brightness also comes in handy while enjoying HDR gaming.
I think a TV as Second Display for your pc might perfect (when you don't need 2 second screens that are vertical). You can "watch" TV while doing some stuff on the pc. You can use a wireless hdmi (unbox therapy showed a wireless hdmi product that looks great) setup to stream your consoles from the living room into your office. When you need the space, you can still use the TV as second display.
I think everyone knows what they need. I play pc games and I think a 144hz monitor is good when you have a good pc that can deliver 144fps. I also need a second screen. At the moment I have an old 4:3 second screen and I need I streaming on twitch, this isn't enough. My graphics card only supports 2 displays, I can't upgrade.
In the future when I have the money, I will buy 3-4 monitors. The main monitor must have the best specs. One lazy monitor where I can display stuff that I don't need to look at often and the other 2 monitors (vertical setup) for additional information.
Just discovered you. Great UA-camr.
Never knew. I thought I would be saving money
Recently got a cheap UHD TV to be able to see UHD content at full resolution. For fun I set it up as my main monitor and as you describe, the color representation and delay are bad for general work. So now it's been put to it's intended use as a secondary screen while editing.
I doubt this video still holds up 4 years later. But I'll check it out still
Another thing to consider:
In my experience, it seems like TV's have a dark outline or "micro gap" around the pixels, namely because they aren't supposed to be viewed from really close, so as long as they are bright enough, you may not notice a gap between them. But with monitors, no matter the size of the pixels, they always seem to have less of a micro gap between eachother as TV's.
This explanation isn't completely debunked by a higher resolutions or lower resolutions. Sadly I don't have a 4k monitor, and 4k TV. But I have a 1080p monitor and a 4k tv for example
No.
@@kaydog890 Elaborate?
@@sagered8007 u said in contrary , its monitors that have small pixels and tvs have big. maybe u can edit to correct clicking the 3 dots
I returned a tv for a monitor when spending 399 dollars on a 4k60 display
Noticeable differences when comparing the monitor to the TV
1. Colours are less blown out which improves image quality
2. There is far less banding in colours
3. Much brighter
4. Text looks much crisper
5. Less colour bleed which makes everything more detailed and sharper
6. Contrast is a bit worse
7. Viewing angles are better
8. Far less reflective
9. Far less ghosting and much better input lag
10. Has less audio ports which is a bit of a bummer
11. Turns on instantly and controlling the image quality is far more flexible
thanks. chroma compression is very important. input lag can differ in ports and manufacturers sometimes point the faster one. disabling all tv post processing (hdr, sharpness, frame interpolation) can also reduce lag to acceptable levels.
Awesome video sir. A very informative, & educational video. You sir have a new subscriber. Keep up the great work.
Ever heard of game mode, it will seriously limit the TV's image processing to where the input lag vastly diminishes.
This guy literally uses a 4k tv as his monitor now LOL
It just shows you humans will always want more. I like to believe I am self aware enough to realize this in myself everything I fall prey
Tech improved, this video is 4 years old
Old Panasonic Plasma tv i see there. I had one of those and loved it back in the day.
Thanks for the info. This confirmed that I should be able to use my tv as a monitor.
Woo hoo! I have the Sony X700D
i still don't see the point why someone shouldn't use a tv capable of 4k@60hz with 4:4:4 as a pc monitor
afaik there is only one monitor capable of 4k@144hz, if you scale down to 1080p/1440p panels, i'd go for a 25" 240hz 1080p
Someone did the work for us already, thankfully. www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-usage/pc-monitor/best
rtings is too US centric for my european tastes :P
seriously a lot of tvs talked there aren't so easy to find here :(
You can I use a 43" Samsung UN43KU6300, low input lag and and 4k@60Hz with 4:4:4. I got mine from Amazon for $425 delivered. It's not ideal though when switch from PC, to game mode you have to set gaming mode every time, if you tab out of the game it resets. So for most games I don't even bother with it and it's perfectly fine in non gaming mode.
Luciano Chiarotto same reason why you don't use a 4K@60hz 40 inch monitor as a tv
My OLED 65" 4KTV fully supports 4:4:4. Those TV monitors you speak of in the video are ten times cheaper than mine for a reason.
Nicely done !
Time to upgrade that Panasonic TVs David.
lol. Love my plasma TV! (yes I know old tech but it's still amazing.) I think I'll wait until OLEDs come down a little in price.
what! that's a legendary tv bro!
Wise choice - the basic LG OLED of last year is now approaching 1500$€
same TV I got bought a new so my picture was shit gave to my son plasma still
best
The really thick bezels really gave it away.
This channel is really good! Probs David, never seen such high quality content from a low-subscribed youtuber. You definitely need more subs!!
Thanks man! Appreciate the comment
I got a 40" Samsung UN40KU6290 to use as a monitor. Does 4:4:4 subsampling, has a 60Hz refresh rate and low input lag, and supports 10-bit HDR (though the panel itself is 8-bit, so it uses dithering). For games and media, it absolutely blows away the 27-inch 2560x1440 I was using before. However, for general PC use (like text editing, reading and web browsing) I think I still prefer my 27-incher. 40-inch is freaking huge for a desk, and because the screen doesn't fit entirely into my field of view I actually have to move my head around to see things on the screen (which is great for added immersion in games, not so much when I'm trying to use to Chrome with the tab bar at the top or bottom).
The 4:4:4 thing is something I was unaware of. Thanks for talking about it. The biggest difference I noticed is that monitors don't output sound. Maybe you should have said THAT in the video, too. Good day, sir!
I use a cheap Vizio 65 inch tv (I think I paid like $400) as my computer monitor for over a year now. If there is input lag, I'm not noticing any. I play every video game genre imaginable including fighters, rts, fps, moba, etc. and I'm not having any problems winning so if there is input lag it doesn't seem to matter I'm still Platinum in League of Legends.
I also thought that, i used to game on tv 55" lg but got a g-sync 100 hz 4ms pc monitor and i improved from diamond to champ in Rocket league almost admittedly after i got it. My point is that you can go a long way with less than ideal setup, but you might gain that 10-20% edge when playing competitive on a true gaming monitor. But then again, all that matters is that you are happy with your current setup.
You should add "probably" to your title :)
Awesome video. This really helped me a lot.
really awesome and informative video, i never really looked at it this way. I've been using a 23" Vizio 1-80p TV as my monitor for the last few month and haven't really noticed to many of these factors but maybe i also just wasn't aware of them to even really notice what was going on haha
Thanks! If it works great for you, keep on enjoying it. But I think 1080p TVs and Monitors have less differences because the internal electronics have matured significantly. And since 4K monitors and TVs are still relatively new the differences in design are much more pronounce.
David Zhang ah yeah, without a doubt. I was honestly thinking of picking up a 4k tv to replace my current "monitor" but this video has changed my mind on that and instead ill be looking for a good 4k monitor. Thanks =)
The bezel on that TV is bigger than my future.
Who cares about a bezel on a tv, it's still 4K
Cool video. 📹🎥📹
Thanks!
My only issue with my 55 inch 4 k TV is that the pixles are arranged in hex or brick patterns, not vertical lines. So the edges of windows look a little fuzzy and so does small text
Short and precise. Thanks!
Nowadays you can find 4k TVs with 4:4:4 Chroma Subsampling and very low 10-12ms input lag, easily. And less than half the price of a comparable monitor.
Where? i need one, post model numbers please.
@@presidentcamacho LG 43UK6090 is one example of a 4K TV with very low input lag and good for gaming. It will cost much less than a 43 inch 4K gaming monitor like Dell P4317Q.
@@m4st3rm1nd9 thank you for that info, it really is a fraction of the price. I wish it were still in stock in my area.
@@presidentcamacho You're welcome.
i use my tv and it works fine (32" 1080p samsung)
Noice
Really liked you video man!
I retired my 4K TV to the entertainment center and got the newer version of that BenQ monitor today. Crazy difference in sharpness, color and brightness
3:32 my monitor is so similar to that
"So does that mean you should never use a TV as a PC monitor? Of course not! Some TVs will work perfectly fine as a PC monitor!"
Yea but wich one? There are tons of diffrent tv's 😕
Excellent video, thanks!!!!
Excellent video. You have contributed for a decision making. Great!
I see TVs with latency of 4 ms nowadays
More than 32 inches is TV 📺 not a monitor 👎 .My favorite 4:4:4 3840x2160 5ms input lag , IPS PANEL at 24 inches
Which TV do you recommend for viewing and working on Google docs or spreadsheets. I tried with a 1080 TV and had to return it because I could not read the spreadsheet cells.
Keep up the great work!
Yeah I plan on getting the Samsung 6300.
That's what I have you love it once you get over the limitation of the setting when connected to a PC. You can't set gaming mode on the TV unless you are in the game, for most stuff it's fine with out it. The TV wont go in that mode from the desktop so if you want it enable you will have to be full screen in the game.
Set the device type to game console, and you can stay in game mode. The only time it'll revert back to PC mode is when you turn on your PC. For some reason the T.V doesn't save the setting.
Thanks. It resets when the TV goes to sleep and noticed you lose 4:4:4 which I'm betting is why they do it.
@@NuclearHendrix and @GlasstopRX7 no no no. You want to just keep it on PC mode with the desktop set to 4:4:4 or RGB so you have 1-1 pixel mapping with minimal enhancements. No reason to switch to gaming mode even when gaming.
"Why you shouldn't..."
(goes on to say that there are plenty of cases where you can and even should)
Indeed "game mode" (which actually usually just eliminates different video effects which increase lag) gets most displays into . Indeed, most TV displays that are 4k UHD can be setup for lag the same as monitors, and with some video tweaks on your pc, any text distortion can be essentially eliminated. In short, unless you're doing computer animation or still graphics creation or editing, there's really not a lot to worry about...even with the less expensive displays. If you're really unhappy, up your zoom. You'll still have vastly more real estate than you could in any other non 4k environment.
He lists two cases.... your use of "plenty" is highly erroneous
@@LilyUnicorn There are only like 4 case examples given.
Therefore, I'd say that the TITLE is highly erroneous.
Long story short, I rejected his advice. Bought one to use as a display. Works and looks great. No problems at all. Saved a bundle of money.
Bad title.
Great vid thanks! Subbed👍🏻
I love my DiNovo Edge keyboard. I bought a second as a backup just in case something happens to my first one.
My first one is now over 10 years old. still only need to charge it once every 2-3 months.
who dislikes these videos and why?
Definitely a great video overall but as you stated it's not always the case, just anyone who wants to try using a TV as a monitor should definitely do a lot of research on the product first. While the lower price options like some of the Vizio or hisense TV's (and sadly some more expensive ones like LG oleds and their horrendous input lag) are a bad choice for a pc monitor there are a fair few exceptions, my UN65KS8500 Samsung can do 4:4:4 with 60 fps 4k hdr with only 19ms input lag and what is quite honestly the clearest image I have ever seen. Because of the size I obvs don't use it as a computer monitor but they offer very similar options with near the same qualities for smaller screens.
Thanks! I completely agree. Oh man. My eyes would burn if I used a 65" TV as a monitor. lol
Thanks a lot, I only knew about input lag, not chrome subsampling. An issue is - many many tv - never mentions about its chroma subsampling - not even in the specs/manual. Hence very tough to know.
Nice and informative video :)
I use my sony 40" TV to watch porn, play games and watch TV or play ps4, or when I feel like it it use it in split mode to watch TV and play games. Seems like a good deal for $400 cheaper than monitor, I'd say screw the unnoticeable input lag. This is every reason to use TV and not monitor. Sorry just saying.
I'm soo gonna connect my mac mini to my 75inch 4k Samsung tv in my bedroom 😂
and i thought that i have bought too big for me, 43" ru7400 samsung and im about 1.20meters from screen :)
Hey dude I just recently started watching your vidz and you defenitely deserve more subs than you have :)
Thanks man!
My gaming rig is set up to my TV with a wireless keyboard/mousepad combo and it works like a dream.