Fantastic and sobering analysis, as always. What I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall during the many meetings between the parliamentarians elected to serve the public, the business elites, and the special interest groups they serve. There is far too much secrecy with how our government spends money and writes laws.
This is a great breakdown. I’m from the USA, but have become interested in C-18 because a link tax seems so strange. Add this to C-11 (which requires US streaming companies to pay out for CanCon), and then Canada being the only nation moving forward with the digital services tax. From my biased American view, seems like Ottawa is obsessed with shaking down successful American tech companies. Aren’t there like housing issues or something Ottawa could instead focus on?
I wonder if Wikipedia would count as an intermediary? They probably have the required traffic, and certainly have links to news. What other sites might they try to force payment from?
thank you for this keep them coming how about being a passenger in a vehicle that is being pulled over... does the passengers have to i.d or just the driver
Good Day Question about privacy: If a software tracks a user by more than publicly available information, ex: IP, should that software not have to get consent BEFORE continuing? In the case of a minor, wouldn't the parents have to agree? Also, if mitigation tactics exist such as using privacy respecting software, getting audits of the software source code done, should that be taken into account especially regarding the safety of children's digital information? Couldn't the collection of data, forgoing knowledgeable consent, be voyeurism, and hence related to R v Jarvis 2019 SCC 10? If this is done on a child, could that change to come kind of child violation? If a parent, board, or school knowingly allows a child to use software, which can be shown to track that child and violate their digital liberty, shouldn't the parents or guardians also face problems? This comes from a case where my daughter's schools were using software that tracked the bleep out of them, and after showing the school and board, many times, I was ignored. On that aspect, if I ask a teacher or the board to encrypt / sign an email for protection and to make sure it can't be intercepted, should they have to protect that communication? This is in regard to using PGP with email.
Please indicate another country that has similar regulations. Please indicate the effects of that indicated similar regulations and sources for the information. Please indicate why this is different from the indicated similar regulations. Afterwards, I will review your document. I don't wish to listen to your video either until after you have provided the requested information.
Excellent breakdown David. I 100 % agree with every point. Have been arguing this myself on IG & TT. Glad to hear I'm not alone.
Fantastic and sobering analysis, as always. What I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall during the many meetings between the parliamentarians elected to serve the public, the business elites, and the special interest groups they serve. There is far too much secrecy with how our government spends money and writes laws.
This is a great breakdown. I’m from the USA, but have become interested in C-18 because a link tax seems so strange. Add this to C-11 (which requires US streaming companies to pay out for CanCon), and then Canada being the only nation moving forward with the digital services tax. From my biased American view, seems like Ottawa is obsessed with shaking down successful American tech companies. Aren’t there like housing issues or something Ottawa could instead focus on?
I wonder if Wikipedia would count as an intermediary? They probably have the required traffic, and certainly have links to news.
What other sites might they try to force payment from?
thank you for this keep them coming how about being a passenger in a vehicle that is being pulled over... does the passengers have to i.d or just the driver
Good Day
Question about privacy:
If a software tracks a user by more than publicly available information, ex: IP, should that software not have to get consent BEFORE continuing? In the case of a minor, wouldn't the parents have to agree? Also, if mitigation tactics exist such as using privacy respecting software, getting audits of the software source code done, should that be taken into account especially regarding the safety of children's digital information?
Couldn't the collection of data, forgoing knowledgeable consent, be voyeurism, and hence related to R v Jarvis 2019 SCC 10? If this is done on a child, could that change to come kind of child violation?
If a parent, board, or school knowingly allows a child to use software, which can be shown to track that child and violate their digital liberty, shouldn't the parents or guardians also face problems?
This comes from a case where my daughter's schools were using software that tracked the bleep out of them, and after showing the school and board, many times, I was ignored.
On that aspect, if I ask a teacher or the board to encrypt / sign an email for protection and to make sure it can't be intercepted, should they have to protect that communication? This is in regard to using PGP with email.
Awful legislation.
Please indicate another country that has similar regulations.
Please indicate the effects of that indicated similar regulations and sources for the information.
Please indicate why this is different from the indicated similar regulations.
Afterwards, I will review your document.
I don't wish to listen to your video either until after you have provided the requested information.
Watch the video or don't watch the video. It's up to you.
@privacylawyer
Point there is a reason to look at what others have done and learn.
Doing anything else is a waste of your time and likely NOT to work