Proposition 1:- The outermeasure of an interval is it's length part 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 чер 2020
  • Hello friends
    This video is in series
    Watch all videos
    Next video ( part 2) :- • Outermeasure of an Int...
    Part III:- • Outermeasure of an int...
    Outermeasure :- • Definition of Outer me...
    • Outer measure ( for be...
    Monotonicity property:- • Monotonicity property ...
    LENGTH:- • Length of an Interval...
    Property:- • Property that proves m...
    Cover:- • Cover :- How union of ...
    Measure theory playlist:- • MEASURE THEORY
    Like Dislike Comment Share Subscribe
    follow me on Instagram :- @kulsanketkumar
    Contanct us 83f2789@gmail.com
    other related quires covered
    outermeasure of any interval is equal to it's length Hindi explanation
    full detail Hindi explanation of outermeasure of an interval is equal to it's length
    m*(I)= L(I)
    outermeasure of an interval is its length in udru
    Each and every explanation of the theorem/ proposition of the outer measure of an interval is its length
    Deep explanation of outer measure of an interval is its length
    outermeasure of an inteval I is length of I
    m*(I)=Length of I interval
    hindi and easy explanation of outer measure of an interval is its length
    #realanalysis
    #measuretheory
    #lebesquemeasure
    #monotonicityproperty
    #outermeasure
    #skclasses
    #puneuniversity
    #outermeasure_of_an_interval_is_its_length
    #highermathematics
    #mscmathematics
    #MSCmaths
    Proposition 1 The outer measure of an interval is its length.
    Proof We begin with the case of a closed, bounded interval [a, b]. Let c 0. Since the open
    interval (a - E, b + E) contains [a, b] we have m* ([a, b]) ((a - E, b+ E)) = b - a+ 2E. This
    holds for any c 0. Therefore m * ([a, b]) b - a. It remains to show that m* ([a, b]) b - a.
    But this is equivalent to showing that if {Ik}k 1 is any countable collection of open, bounded
    intervals covering [a, b], then
    00
    E f(Ik) b - a. (1)
    k=1
    By the Heine-Borel Theorem,4 any collection of open intervals covering [a, b] has a finite
    subcollection that also covers [a, b]. Choose a natural number n for which {Ik}k=1 covers
    [a, b]. We will show that
    n
    I f(Ik)?b-a, (2)
    k=1
    and therefore (1) holds. Since a belongs to uk=1 Ik, there must be one of the Ik's that contains
    a. Select such an interval and denote it by (al, bl ). We have a1 a b1. If b1 b, the
    inequality (2) is established since
    n
    Ef(Ik)bl-alb-a.
    k=1
    Otherwise, b1 E [a, b), and since b10 (al, b1), there is an interval in the collection {Ik)k=1,
    which we label (a2, b2), distinct from (al, bi), for which b1 E (a2, b2); that is, a2 b1 b2.
    If b2 b, the inequality (2) is established since
    n
    I f(Ik) (b1-al)+(b2-a2)=b2-(a2-bl)-alb2-alb-a.
    k=1
    We continue this selection process until it terminates, as it must since there are only n
    intervals in the collection {Ik}k=1. Thus we obtain a subcollection {(ak, bk )}k
    1 of {Ik}k=1 for
    which
    while
    at a,
    ak+1 bk for l k N -1,
    and, since the selection process terminated,
    bN b.
    Thus
    n N
    I f(Ik) 2f((ai,bi))
    k=1 k=1
    _ (bN -aN)+(bN-1 -al)
    =bN-(aN-bN-1)-...-(a2-bl)-al
    bN - al b - a.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 24