Really cool series of cards that ultimately just read "Full snake eyes combo, BUT you get to have a free omni negate before you start going off" Seriously, at the cost of 2 extra deck slots and 2 cards in main, you just Diabel into sinful spoils deception, sac diabel to search the azamina spell, sac deception for Rielago, search Original sinful spoils use grave effect of Azamina to put it back into hand, sac OSSl to get the omni negate, and use grave effect of OSS to search ash and you now have a full snake eyes line insulated with an omni negate
This game is fucked if they don't do something to the deck that doesn't involve banning ash (or OSS/Poplar) because it doesn't matter how many Ash are legal given that the combo searches the Ash, I for one will not be indulging in prayers for Droll and Lock bird in opener because that is not fun gameplay.
I really like the diabellstar lore deck. I can't wait for the eventual snake eyes hits, because diabellstar itself is pretty fun. I have a "Casual" snake eyes deck that runs more of the current sinful spoil cards and diabellze, for fun. I don't think it's much of a problem that diabellstar doesn't stay on the field. Albaz is just used as a board breaker or stays in deck to immediately be fused off, while Visas was used in scareclaw, and then not used again until mannadium, at the end of his lore arc. I joined in 2022, so not sure what lore archtype was before that, but it seems pretty standard.
Before Albaz and Visas it was World Chalice which was.... a lot. It has World Chalice, Crusdia, Orcurst, Krawler, Mekk Knight, Knightmare, and more probably.
I really do not like Azamina design, because of 2 line it creates: (Wanted) Diabelstar line: Special Summon Diabellstar, add Sinful Spoil Deception. Activate Sinful Spoil Deception, tribute a monster in hand, add Sacred Azamina. Sacred Azamina send Deception to summon Rcielago. Rcielago add Original SInful Spoil. Rcielago + Diabelstar = Link-2. Sacred Azamina GY eff shuffle Rcielago and add itself to the hand. Sacred Azamina activate, send Original SInful spoil, summon Silvera. Original Sinful spoil effect to banish, add Ash/Poplar. If you drew Wanted, you get the draw If you get Deception instead, the line stay the same, but instead of the Wanted draw being a "maybe" it's now a guarantee. End board: (Any Link-2) + (an omninegate) + (Snake-Eyes line) + free follow up with the Sacred Azamina in GY which also make that you never need more then 1 of each, since they both get shuffled. Azamina in Snake-Eyes is making the deck having a BETTER endboard, consistancy AND follow-up. Absolutly insane that they ever thought it was a good idea.
@@giuseppepepe4404 The Fiendsmith card you can't get both the omninegate and the combo at the same time The Fiendsmith card you can't play around Droll as easily - here you always at least get the omninegate (except if you start with Wanted, in which case you add OSS with Witch) The Fiendsmith card doesn't setup your Diabellstar grind game for free and is forced to use Princess effect, meaning the endboard is relativly worse (still crazy) However, The Fiendsmith can be accessed anytime, and have more adaptation But, whether or not one is better then the other, both go well together You don't have to choose one, just do both - it makes hand with akward Sinful Spoil a lot better - all of that for 4 card and a half brick that is easy to play around
And vital extra deck space,in a deck that is already pretty tight on all those fronts,that might change with future banlists but right now it doesn't seem to likely
@@Xero-rr2ol What? Absolutely not. Instead of 1 synchro on the opponent turn you can make 3. The deck is less bricky, and the synergy make it way more resilient.
this seems so unlikely, but if it happens I'd be overjoyed honestly. Definitely the best designed trap cards to exist in yugioh, and they came out what feels like forever ago now.
It is not impossible but there is only space for 3 more traps that could be occupied by Paleozoic and they are 78, 79 and 80 so it is difficult for it to happen since it competes with the generic traps and with the possible support that accompanies the monsters 14 , 15, 16, 17 and 18. However, there is still free space that could be occupied by Xyz cards, specifically 43, 44, 45, 46 and 47 that will be shared between the Xyz cards and the Link cards that have not yet been presented.
@@captainsunshine64 I am doing it for him. He shares a name with my late Father so I am making my bets and hoping it pays. Odds are that they will get support soon. Especially with the discovery of new species that the archetype was originally based on. Three new species were discovered and can be used as new cards for the deck. With three unknown trap card slots that we are aware of, it makes sense that they would be in this set. If not then maybe later down the line.
so i hope they just ban original sin and leave wanted alone because then we could get a world where diabellstar an deck is instead of an engine. going from playing handrtaps fenrir diabellstar on masterduel which is surprisingly better than it has any right to be you really need the wanted reshuffling your 1 off traps to make it viable to play diabelstar control and with that new archetype is then the extradeck part of that deck
I really wish because I've tried out those cards on dueling book (Customsection) and like.. wanted and diabellstarr feel amazing. I'm trying out Labrynth w/ this new archetype, it's basically just Sinful Spoil control and it's an extremely cool deck. It shouldn't die because of snake-eye being broken.
Well, Azamina is a Engine for like, any deck that can use one extra deck space and you got 9 ways to make the omni in 1.5 card combos. (Wanted being one that you can draw 1). Also, if Original doesnt get banned, this is like, Omni negate + Full SE combo after it. So yeah, Diabellstar deck is not going to happen, because clearly Konami want you to use it as a broken engine☠️
The fact that most of the Fusions are also level 6 just already feels alarming especially with Fiendsmith running around and then the fact Beatrice still remains. Also OCG having the new Magistus, Chorozo can make things even worse. Good thing is TCG banned Baronne though.
Yeah the access to an omni that can be easily brought out and recycled is the most cringe part of this so far. Yes it doesn’t destroy and tributes itself to do it, but that doesn’t matter if you just hit normal/quick play spells, traps, and or monster hand traps while it can just come back on field soon after so it being off the field is hardly a downside. 2nd cringe thing (less so then first part though) is just the random tacked on 1500 burn + you get 1500 LP recovery on a card that has good effects already (literally a searcher so they would run multiple copies) on top of being Cont which just gives the deck scummy time win cons
The new Sinful Spoil Offenders card actually works rather well with Snake-Eyes Diabellstar, doesn't it? It mentions "Monster Card", so it counts Snake-Eyes Diabellstar when it is in the Spell/Trap Zone. Not only that, but the second effects allows you to chain block the your own Snake-Eyes Diabellstar on battle effect if I'm not wrong, right? It kind of allows you to dodge the effect of your Snake-Eyes Diabellstar getting negated by making it CL1 and then the trap is CL2. It's not the greatest, but I do see the synergy working rather well for that card... Regardless, Azamina seems like a pretty awesome archetype. My only hope is that Fiendsmith doesn't last too long, or that they hit Snake-Eye in some shape or form. It's a shame imo, I think Snake-Eye is a really cool deck because most of its gameplan lies in recursion and removal -- but the way Fiendsmith breaks it, and the fact WANTED is a card, and the fact OSS summons generic level 1 FIREs, and the fact the deck has so much room for handtraps, etc. etc It's kind of a "death by a thousand paper cuts" sort of deal, if that makes any sense. I want to see more decks with the Snake-Eyes gameplan, but it allows so much degenerate stuff to exist too... Never know what to really think about it.
Its a give and take. Tributing itself is worse into cbtg and for followup, but it also means they can't chain imperm or veiler to it if you negate a nib or something
The performapal can send royal magical library and then make selene to bring it back. A deck doesn't need a lot of continuous spells to run it, just 1 good searchable one.
That fusion spell reads crazy. Send stuff I already want in grave to the grave so I can summon a fusion monster that’s actually good. Like it so far though
Sinful Spoils Deception is a 1.5 card way to get a lvl 6 body on board and something like Sinful Spoils - Snake-Eye or WANTED into hand... just incase Snake-Eyes didn't already have enough starters. Deception + Ash and any other monster just allows you to get out the Omni before committing to Ash. Honestly Konami could ban Beatrice, limit both Ash and WANTED and Snake-Eyes will still be the best deck in the game and still ridiculously consistent once these guys come out. I agree the only way to really keep this archetype relevant without it just being an engine to keep Snake-Eye the best deck is by banning Sinful Spoils - Snake Eye.
looks a bit too good imo. I like the synergies with white woods, fiendsmith but also chimera... but these cards are just waiting for someone to break them. the goblin I really like though^^ 1 card rank 3/6/9 xyz or lvl 9 synchro
Really hope Flameberg goes on the next list. That would leave Snake Eyes as an interesting enngine and the Diabellstarr stuufcould be doing thet own thing. (And maybe wanted to 1)
18:19 not sure if u noticed but all sinful spoils say Diabellstar monster , not Diabellstar the black witch , with that being said , I think we might be getting new Diabellstar monster ......eventually
Personally i like when archetypes have their own negate, because otherwise they completely lose to a single board breaker or late hand trap. The new fusion at least doesn't destroy and has to tribute itself to negate, so you have to remake it if you end up using it on your turn. I only find negates toxic when there's too many of them
Its so annoying that snake-eye get with every set more and more broken. 1 card starter with fusion that summons an omni negate + still 5 in Hand before u even start with snake eye ash
With these new cards, you can normal summon ash under the protection of that omni negate with just diabell in hand. You don’t even need an ash in your opening hand.
@@dalverp3726 They are very playable in snake-eyes it turn wanted or diabellstar from a search into a Omni negate and still searches ash/poplar for a full snake-eyes combo.
@@dalverp3726why won't they play? Azamina itself already gave you Omni Negate on summon number 3 and starter,but on other side its more succeptible (maybe i spell it wrong) to droll
If you mean the storyline, then yeah, but it would make more sense to say albaz or abyss since branded is really more of the fusion side of the storyline. Azamina could be seen as the new branded but they are just an engine at the moment
@@justice8718 Those builds exist, but the deck is primarily fusion centric. If we were to take a step further, branded refers to the s/t, with the majority supporting or related to fusion monsters in some way.
I still prefer Flamberge ban over OSS. OSS as a starter for Fire King etc is also annoying, but if Flamberge stays opening Ash is still full combo. It's basically just a consistency hit.
I would limit Poplar and Flameberge While keeping Snash at three. Then ban Apo and the deck will die as it becomes to risky to open both Snash and Poplar with no follow up. Apo ban would also keep SE in check for a while
Limit Flamberge when people are already playing it at 1 lol (with Fiendsmith stuffs), and Poplar as well is already only at 1 on some decks. Banning OSS or at least Oak is the way to go if you want to seriously do something to SE.
@@shirohiruka You do realize they only can play one of each because Fiendsmith is the problem then? Because without it they don’t have a way to ditch Poplar/Flameberge to GY. Fact is that Poplar becomes a Garnet for those decks which is one of the reasons Brilliant fusion doesn’t see play anymore regardless of the deck in MD even though it would be a blow out card. You run 2 garnets in Lazuli and Garnet for just an extra normal. So a two to one garnet ratio is too risky even in 60 card decks to run it. This means if you keep the deck in check by increasing their brick chance its a good way to hit the deck. If you wanna be extra sure ban Princess as well and the Fiendsmiths wont even see play with SE anymore
Diabel actually has some good tools like Betrayal - Silvera for permanent omni-negate for all face-up cards on the field, Subversion - Snake-Eye as one of the best removal for now, and pseudo-Raigeki with Doom - Rciela. But why you wanna play fair trade 1 for 1, when you can just set Original Sins and grab more advantages for that? . Original Sinful maybe is the only Sinful card that I never play in Master Duel. Because this card it just booooooring. I enjoy Betrayal - Silvera as mini engine in some low tier deck and Doom - Rciela in Dark Magician or any decks with big Spellcaster.
Yeah thats how it was before this With more support and searchers The “terrible” sinful spoils will be playable and splashable in a diabell/sinful deck
I’m sick of this sinful soil garbage I even made a video today talking about these and it’s so toxic they haven’t learned from baron we need a ban list so bad
I don't get what the chat was yapping about the whole time, these don't look very generic at all, they're a pretty big engine so most decks surely won't use all that, especially decks that use only the sinful spoils probably won't play all those extra bricky spells or cut a whole lot of extra space
This is as generic as it gets lol. You are the one yapping. This is basically Adventure engine 2.0 with less bricks and more starters. Read the cont. spell. 1 Diabel now give you omni negate and access to SE Ash
Diabel set cont spell, use it to search fusion spell. Sac Diabel, summon fusion that add, adds OSS. Grab back the fusion spell. Sac the OSS, summon the omni negate. Use OSS to add Ash. NS Ash. There you go, full SE combo with omni already up with just 1 soft brick + 1 hard brick (Adventure engine has 3 hard bricks)
Istg, these spells serve as a good litmus test to see if someone understands how Yu-Gi-Oh cards work(or English in general). People have been very confused by the 3 fusion s/t's
Banning OSS does NOT change what snake eye do at all , it only stop you from splashing diabell engine while killing rouge decks like T.G infernoid volcanic Silvera omni negate effect is because her original form( the sinful spoil of betrayal silvera) is an omni negate and when destroyed she search a trap ss which is herself Same goes for others
And now only Ash is the real starter. Poplar does nothing, Bonfire into Poplar does nothing. Banning OSS is quite literally the effective way of hitting the deck, hence why a lot of people are suggesting it
@@shirohiruka limiting poplar single handed stop oss Banning oak weaken them so much Banning flamebereg kill the deck Banning oss wont change them you just taking diabell cards out
@superpolymerization4169 No lol. How is banning OSS not changed the deck at all? Read my comment. SE now dies to any single HT, like a normal deck should do, no more extending after 2 HTs. And now only Ash is the real starter. Poplar does nothing. Bonfire into Poplar does nothing. You clearly don't play SE if you think OSS is not what makes SE broken lmao
Original is the most dumb card. It has so much unnecessary synergy. Like imagine if these cards said “summon a level 2 spellcaster from deck” like no reason for that.
I need an omni-negate or monster negate. I hate Nibiru and it makes things unfun. Nibiru needs to die before omnis do. Long live cool combo archetypes!
I really like the diabellstar lore deck. I can't wait for the eventual snake eyes hits, because diabellstar itself is pretty fun. I have a "Casual" snake eyes deck that runs more of the current sinful spoil cards and diabellze, for fun. I don't think it's much of a problem that diabellstar doesn't stay on the field. Albaz is just used as a board breaker or stays in deck to immediately be fused off, while Visas was used in scareclaw, and then not used again until mannadium, at the end of his lore arc. I joined in 2022, so not sure what lore archtype was before that, but it seems pretty standard.
Yeah, I'm pretty hyped to hear how The DB Grinder is gonna pronounce these ones.
Fr
"Insert the Joke about learning Runnick Azamina Here"
Today I learned about Runick Azamina
I think you can combine them with White Woods, at least partially.
Nvm joke, this is probably viable with a few white woods cards
Runick white woods azamina
Josh is truly diabelle lover (poor raye)
Dammit, someone already beat me to the punch! XD
That Level 6 Fusion combined with a Fiendsmith engine scares me.
There's already an opening combo for Snake-Eyes involving those 2.
Anything with Fiendsmith is scary
Don't give them ideas
Really cool series of cards that ultimately just read "Full snake eyes combo, BUT you get to have a free omni negate before you start going off"
Seriously, at the cost of 2 extra deck slots and 2 cards in main, you just Diabel into sinful spoils deception, sac diabel to search the azamina spell, sac deception for Rielago, search Original sinful spoils use grave effect of Azamina to put it back into hand, sac OSSl to get the omni negate, and use grave effect of OSS to search ash and you now have a full snake eyes line insulated with an omni negate
This game is fucked if they don't do something to the deck that doesn't involve banning ash (or OSS/Poplar) because it doesn't matter how many Ash are legal given that the combo searches the Ash, I for one will not be indulging in prayers for Droll and Lock bird in opener because that is not fun gameplay.
sinful spoil decenption is also full combo so a new starter that doesn't use your normal summon
An Omni negate that work under skill drain
for what it's worth
Cant believe that the wave 1 of support for a new archetype includes art of them jobbing
HUH
I really like the diabellstar lore deck. I can't wait for the eventual snake eyes hits, because diabellstar itself is pretty fun. I have a "Casual" snake eyes deck that runs more of the current sinful spoil cards and diabellze, for fun.
I don't think it's much of a problem that diabellstar doesn't stay on the field. Albaz is just used as a board breaker or stays in deck to immediately be fused off, while Visas was used in scareclaw, and then not used again until mannadium, at the end of his lore arc. I joined in 2022, so not sure what lore archtype was before that, but it seems pretty standard.
Before Albaz and Visas it was World Chalice which was.... a lot. It has World Chalice, Crusdia, Orcurst, Krawler, Mekk Knight, Knightmare, and more probably.
I really do not like Azamina design, because of 2 line it creates:
(Wanted) Diabelstar line: Special Summon Diabellstar, add Sinful Spoil Deception. Activate Sinful Spoil Deception, tribute a monster in hand, add Sacred Azamina. Sacred Azamina send Deception to summon Rcielago. Rcielago add Original SInful Spoil. Rcielago + Diabelstar = Link-2. Sacred Azamina GY eff shuffle Rcielago and add itself to the hand. Sacred Azamina activate, send Original SInful spoil, summon Silvera. Original Sinful spoil effect to banish, add Ash/Poplar. If you drew Wanted, you get the draw
If you get Deception instead, the line stay the same, but instead of the Wanted draw being a "maybe" it's now a guarantee.
End board: (Any Link-2) + (an omninegate) + (Snake-Eyes line) + free follow up with the Sacred Azamina in GY which also make that you never need more then 1 of each, since they both get shuffled.
Azamina in Snake-Eyes is making the deck having a BETTER endboard, consistancy AND follow-up. Absolutly insane that they ever thought it was a good idea.
I don't think this Is any better than the fiendsmith cards honestly tho
@@giuseppepepe4404 The Fiendsmith card you can't get both the omninegate and the combo at the same time
The Fiendsmith card you can't play around Droll as easily - here you always at least get the omninegate (except if you start with Wanted, in which case you add OSS with Witch)
The Fiendsmith card doesn't setup your Diabellstar grind game for free and is forced to use Princess effect, meaning the endboard is relativly worse (still crazy)
However, The Fiendsmith can be accessed anytime, and have more adaptation
But, whether or not one is better then the other, both go well together
You don't have to choose one, just do both - it makes hand with akward Sinful Spoil a lot better - all of that for 4 card and a half brick that is easy to play around
And vital extra deck space,in a deck that is already pretty tight on all those fronts,that might change with future banlists but right now it doesn't seem to likely
Diabellstar was a 1 card omni already with the Silvera trap
@@ShinerCCC And how do you still get the Snake-Eyes combo if you go for Silvera?
I’m so excited for white woods centurion - trying to cook up something proper without baronne and calamity
sadly white woods centurion is kind of just worse then normal centurion.
Its way better and more resilient from testing
@@Xero-rr2ol What? Absolutely not. Instead of 1 synchro on the opponent turn you can make 3. The deck is less bricky, and the synergy make it way more resilient.
@@Xero-rr2ol Just straightup not true.
@@Xero-rr2olit’s better but yeah
Its literally just adventure but illusion flavored
You expect White wood to be right up your alley?!?! Ayoooooo 😏
Lol
freaskshua schmidt
What is this joke even suppose to mean?
@@trippersigs2248pp + butt joke
@@trippersigs2248"lol edgy joke about some yugioh player liking an archetype with kids in the artwork"
I hear that Paleo is getting new cards in Rage of the Abyss.
this seems so unlikely, but if it happens I'd be overjoyed honestly. Definitely the best designed trap cards to exist in yugioh, and they came out what feels like forever ago now.
Don't do that to Josh, poor guy
It is not impossible but there is only space for 3 more traps that could be occupied by Paleozoic and they are 78, 79 and 80 so it is difficult for it to happen since it competes with the generic traps and with the possible support that accompanies the monsters 14 , 15, 16, 17 and 18.
However, there is still free space that could be occupied by Xyz cards, specifically 43, 44, 45, 46 and 47 that will be shared between the Xyz cards and the Link cards that have not yet been presented.
Word on the street is it's the Runick Fountain of Paleo
@@captainsunshine64 I am doing it for him. He shares a name with my late Father so I am making my bets and hoping it pays. Odds are that they will get support soon. Especially with the discovery of new species that the archetype was originally based on. Three new species were discovered and can be used as new cards for the deck. With three unknown trap card slots that we are aware of, it makes sense that they would be in this set. If not then maybe later down the line.
so i hope they just ban original sin and leave wanted alone because then we could get a world where diabellstar an deck is instead of an engine. going from playing handrtaps fenrir diabellstar on masterduel which is surprisingly better than it has any right to be you really need the wanted reshuffling your 1 off traps to make it viable to play diabelstar control and with that new archetype is then the extradeck part of that deck
Yeah OSS would be a good hit and remove wanted and diabelstar as starters
I really wish because I've tried out those cards on dueling book (Customsection) and like.. wanted and diabellstarr feel amazing. I'm trying out Labrynth w/ this new archetype, it's basically just Sinful Spoil control and it's an extremely cool deck. It shouldn't die because of snake-eye being broken.
This surely means that original is gonna get banned. It'd be stupid if they dont
Well, Azamina is a Engine for like, any deck that can use one extra deck space and you got 9 ways to make the omni in 1.5 card combos. (Wanted being one that you can draw 1). Also, if Original doesnt get banned, this is like, Omni negate + Full SE combo after it. So yeah, Diabellstar deck is not going to happen, because clearly Konami want you to use it as a broken engine☠️
Please ban Flamberge and keep Wanted at three, Please ban Flamberge and keep Wanted at three, Please ban Flamberge and keep Wanted at three…
Ok
No
The fact that most of the Fusions are also level 6 just already feels alarming especially with Fiendsmith running around and then the fact Beatrice still remains. Also OCG having the new Magistus, Chorozo can make things even worse. Good thing is TCG banned Baronne though.
Ban original sinful spoils and it can be great/cool.
Sinful Spoils Deception is absolutely cracked
Azamina would be sick if they weren't effectively Link-1 monsters tied to an archetype that easily recycles their spells and traps.
Did Josh totally miss the Goblin cards?
That new goblin spell is bonkers, better than a custom card level bonkers
Shit the Normal Summonable level 6 now gives Goblins 2 1 Card Combos why did he say nothing about them?
Yeah the access to an omni that can be easily brought out and recycled is the most cringe part of this so far.
Yes it doesn’t destroy and tributes itself to do it, but that doesn’t matter if you just hit normal/quick play spells, traps, and or monster hand traps while it can just come back on field soon after so it being off the field is hardly a downside.
2nd cringe thing (less so then first part though) is just the random tacked on 1500 burn + you get 1500 LP recovery on a card that has good effects already (literally a searcher so they would run multiple copies) on top of being Cont which just gives the deck scummy time win cons
I’m really liking the Sinful Spoils and WW archetypes. Especially visually.
I rly hope azamina WW works out
I think the omminegate is fine here. Not on a big body, has cost when using, gives some follow-ups but not a combo piece (yet).
Bat = murciélago in Spanish ❤
Segunda Etapa (I'm a nerd)
@@InhaereBisecarebleach reference!
All the designs are super sick
This just looks like a crazy engine exclusive to decks that are already very meta relevant. Am I missing somthing?
"Nothing too powerful"... literally full SE combo and Fiendsmith combo.
With 1 card
Now i want to play Azamina Invokhed
The new Sinful Spoil Offenders card actually works rather well with Snake-Eyes Diabellstar, doesn't it? It mentions "Monster Card", so it counts Snake-Eyes Diabellstar when it is in the Spell/Trap Zone. Not only that, but the second effects allows you to chain block the your own Snake-Eyes Diabellstar on battle effect if I'm not wrong, right? It kind of allows you to dodge the effect of your Snake-Eyes Diabellstar getting negated by making it CL1 and then the trap is CL2.
It's not the greatest, but I do see the synergy working rather well for that card...
Regardless, Azamina seems like a pretty awesome archetype. My only hope is that Fiendsmith doesn't last too long, or that they hit Snake-Eye in some shape or form. It's a shame imo, I think Snake-Eye is a really cool deck because most of its gameplan lies in recursion and removal -- but the way Fiendsmith breaks it, and the fact WANTED is a card, and the fact OSS summons generic level 1 FIREs, and the fact the deck has so much room for handtraps, etc. etc
It's kind of a "death by a thousand paper cuts" sort of deal, if that makes any sense. I want to see more decks with the Snake-Eyes gameplan, but it allows so much degenerate stuff to exist too... Never know what to really think about it.
One problem is how do you get to it
I will say,an omni that doesn't destroy,is hard once,has to tribute itself and isn't even too difficult to run over doesn't seem so bad
Your nibiru get negated in T1
At least the negate outs itself and it doesnt destroy. Also tributing doesnt trigger its secondary effect
Its a give and take. Tributing itself is worse into cbtg and for followup, but it also means they can't chain imperm or veiler to it if you negate a nib or something
White woods Azamina sounds absolutely filthy
Fiendsmith/sinful spoil/Azamina gonna go stupid
Azamina mina mina eh eh....
Sam-level joke
The performapal can send royal magical library and then make selene to bring it back. A deck doesn't need a lot of continuous spells to run it, just 1 good searchable one.
This exact day I have obtained knowledge of a yugioh strategy that involves the archetypes of runcik and azamina
That fusion spell reads crazy. Send stuff I already want in grave to the grave so I can summon a fusion monster that’s actually good. Like it so far though
Sinful Spoils Deception is a 1.5 card way to get a lvl 6 body on board and something like Sinful Spoils - Snake-Eye or WANTED into hand... just incase Snake-Eyes didn't already have enough starters. Deception + Ash and any other monster just allows you to get out the Omni before committing to Ash. Honestly Konami could ban Beatrice, limit both Ash and WANTED and Snake-Eyes will still be the best deck in the game and still ridiculously consistent once these guys come out. I agree the only way to really keep this archetype relevant without it just being an engine to keep Snake-Eye the best deck is by banning Sinful Spoils - Snake Eye.
I think it's pretty neat how the Silvera fusion negates just like the trap card version
For sky magician girl you could play it in branded to dump Cartesia. You're always going to have branded regained or branded lost up on the field.
looks a bit too good imo. I like the synergies with white woods, fiendsmith but also chimera... but these cards are just waiting for someone to break them. the goblin I really like though^^ 1 card rank 3/6/9 xyz or lvl 9 synchro
Cool point fusion spell sends as effect so you can activate it chain wanted (i think) and on res send it for the fusion
Today i learned Runick Azamina,Chimera Azamina
What gonna happens : Snake Eyes Fiendsmith Azamina
Josh’s chat is so ridiculous. Mf tryna use that Performapal card in Snake-Eye 🙄
I bet Azamina finnah take up most of the secret rare spots and ultra rare spots
Really hope Flameberg goes on the next list. That would leave Snake Eyes as an interesting enngine and the Diabellstarr stuufcould be doing thet own thing. (And maybe wanted to 1)
Surprised he didnt make the video longer to talk about the new Goblin cards
Today, I learned about Azamina Runick 🤗
18:19 not sure if u noticed but all sinful spoils say Diabellstar monster , not Diabellstar the black witch , with that being said , I think we might be getting new Diabellstar monster ......eventually
It’s because Snake Eye Diabellstar exists
@realzeero8316 yes , I don't think that's the last one tho , that is as u said SNAKE EYE Diabellstar, they might do that for other sinful spoils
Personally i like when archetypes have their own negate, because otherwise they completely lose to a single board breaker or late hand trap. The new fusion at least doesn't destroy and has to tribute itself to negate, so you have to remake it if you end up using it on your turn. I only find negates toxic when there's too many of them
The Omni negate smokes skill drain and the level 8 fusion can bring it back
Can we ban Flamberge now?
Its so annoying that snake-eye get with every set more and more broken. 1 card starter with fusion that summons an omni negate + still 5 in Hand before u even start with snake eye ash
+ u have fiendsmith aswell that plays perfectly in it as fiend archetype
what are you saying? none of these cards will be played in snake eye
With these new cards, you can normal summon ash under the protection of that omni negate with just diabell in hand. You don’t even need an ash in your opening hand.
@@dalverp3726 They are very playable in snake-eyes it turn wanted or diabellstar from a search into a Omni negate and still searches ash/poplar for a full snake-eyes combo.
@@dalverp3726why won't they play? Azamina itself already gave you Omni Negate on summon number 3 and starter,but on other side its more succeptible (maybe i spell it wrong) to droll
The diabellstars is the new and modern branded i swear to god
If you mean the storyline, then yeah, but it would make more sense to say albaz or abyss since branded is really more of the fusion side of the storyline.
Azamina could be seen as the new branded but they are just an engine at the moment
@@chewdoom8415branded is fusion-synchro.
@@justice8718 Those builds exist, but the deck is primarily fusion centric. If we were to take a step further, branded refers to the s/t, with the majority supporting or related to fusion monsters in some way.
This is gonna be the next snake eyes
Just dump sky magician girl in a horus pile, should be good
lamborghini azamina
Could you play these cards with chimera as illusion material ?
100%, very good use of it
Yes 100
My question is does this Azamina archetype look better than white woods? And does this look like it could be played along side white woods?
I think they should just limit all of the snake eye monsters as well as original sinful spoils.
There are 8 sinful spoils cards.
It’s kinda ridiculous that you can drop an omni negate for your very first summon.
“someone wants oak to die” girl quit
I still prefer Flamberge ban over OSS.
OSS as a starter for Fire King etc is also annoying, but if Flamberge stays opening Ash is still full combo.
It's basically just a consistency hit.
Chimera white woods maybe
I’m sorry if I’m stupid but is Fiendsmith part of the Diabellstar lore?
No
As far as we know, no.
Nope
@@sallas09 I’m only asking because where does the fusion material of fiend come from (lore wise)?
@@NewtBannner I think they’re Diabell (the big White Woods Synchro) plus the White Woods tuners or Goblin Bikers.
to me sounds like fusion drytron
Chimera azamina
Wiiiiild
So... theyre never gonna ban Original Sinful Spoils 😂
I would limit Poplar and Flameberge
While keeping Snash at three.
Then ban Apo and the deck will die as it becomes to risky to open both Snash and Poplar with no follow up.
Apo ban would also keep SE in check for a while
Limit Flamberge when people are already playing it at 1 lol (with Fiendsmith stuffs), and Poplar as well is already only at 1 on some decks. Banning OSS or at least Oak is the way to go if you want to seriously do something to SE.
@@shirohiruka You do realize they only can play one of each because Fiendsmith is the problem then?
Because without it they don’t have a way to ditch Poplar/Flameberge to GY.
Fact is that Poplar becomes a Garnet for those decks which is one of the reasons Brilliant fusion doesn’t see play anymore regardless of the deck in MD even though it would be a blow out card. You run 2 garnets in Lazuli and Garnet for just an extra normal.
So a two to one garnet ratio is too risky even in 60 card decks to run it.
This means if you keep the deck in check by increasing their brick chance its a good way to hit the deck.
If you wanna be extra sure ban Princess as well and the Fiendsmiths wont even see play with SE anymore
Diabel actually has some good tools like Betrayal - Silvera for permanent omni-negate for all face-up cards on the field, Subversion - Snake-Eye as one of the best removal for now, and pseudo-Raigeki with Doom - Rciela. But why you wanna play fair trade 1 for 1, when you can just set Original Sins and grab more advantages for that?
.
Original Sinful maybe is the only Sinful card that I never play in Master Duel. Because this card it just booooooring. I enjoy Betrayal - Silvera as mini engine in some low tier deck and Doom - Rciela in Dark Magician or any decks with big Spellcaster.
Yeah thats how it was before this
With more support and searchers
The “terrible” sinful spoils will be playable and splashable in a diabell/sinful deck
Looks like Chimera support to me??
Let's see the next ban list before maximum paranoia, yeah? One will likely drop before ROTA.
Where goblin reaction 🥺🥺🥺
Runick azamina?
Josh’s hate for Omni’s makes me feel he wants nib to dominate the format
I want to take the copium of banning OSS, but I prefer Poplar, I want my UR dust in Master Duel.
The new Performapal Magician being a 5 and not a pendulum makes it useless. Not worth playing.
Are ppl on crack ppl are gonna use this in white forest its crazy good
I’m sick of this sinful soil garbage I even made a video today talking about these and it’s so toxic they haven’t learned from baron we need a ban list so bad
I don't get what the chat was yapping about the whole time, these don't look very generic at all, they're a pretty big engine so most decks surely won't use all that, especially decks that use only the sinful spoils probably won't play all those extra bricky spells or cut a whole lot of extra space
The continuous sinful spoil allow you to turn any monster into original by summoning the searcher fusion and add wanted
This is as generic as it gets lol. You are the one yapping. This is basically Adventure engine 2.0 with less bricks and more starters.
Read the cont. spell.
1 Diabel now give you omni negate and access to SE Ash
Diabel set cont spell, use it to search fusion spell. Sac Diabel, summon fusion that add, adds OSS.
Grab back the fusion spell. Sac the OSS, summon the omni negate. Use OSS to add Ash. NS Ash. There you go, full SE combo with omni already up with just 1 soft brick + 1 hard brick (Adventure engine has 3 hard bricks)
Istg, these spells serve as a good litmus test to see if someone understands how Yu-Gi-Oh cards work(or English in general). People have been very confused by the 3 fusion s/t's
I was surprised how some of them were so confused about it. It says every 4 levels and they somehow think that you have to send 2 cards for a level 6.
amen, just get rid of snake eyes ffs
Banning OSS does NOT change what snake eye do at all , it only stop you from splashing diabell engine while killing rouge decks like T.G infernoid volcanic
Silvera omni negate effect is because her original form( the sinful spoil of betrayal silvera) is an omni negate and when destroyed she search a trap ss which is herself
Same goes for others
It changes a lot. Now SE dies to literally a single HT. No more keep extending bullshit after 2 HTs
And now only Ash is the real starter. Poplar does nothing, Bonfire into Poplar does nothing. Banning OSS is quite literally the effective way of hitting the deck, hence why a lot of people are suggesting it
@@shirohiruka limiting poplar single handed stop oss
Banning oak weaken them so much
Banning flamebereg kill the deck
Banning oss wont change them you just taking diabell cards out
@superpolymerization4169 No lol. How is banning OSS not changed the deck at all?
Read my comment.
SE now dies to any single HT, like a normal deck should do, no more extending after 2 HTs. And now only Ash is the real starter. Poplar does nothing. Bonfire into Poplar does nothing. You clearly don't play SE if you think OSS is not what makes SE broken lmao
This aged so poorly
Original is the most dumb card. It has so much unnecessary synergy. Like imagine if these cards said “summon a level 2 spellcaster from deck” like no reason for that.
I need an omni-negate or monster negate. I hate Nibiru and it makes things unfun. Nibiru needs to die before omnis do.
Long live cool combo archetypes!
Yeah have fun losing coin toss and going 2nd lol
Maybe just learn a combo deck that can play around nib
I really like the diabellstar lore deck. I can't wait for the eventual snake eyes hits, because diabellstar itself is pretty fun. I have a "Casual" snake eyes deck that runs more of the current sinful spoil cards and diabellze, for fun.
I don't think it's much of a problem that diabellstar doesn't stay on the field. Albaz is just used as a board breaker or stays in deck to immediately be fused off, while Visas was used in scareclaw, and then not used again until mannadium, at the end of his lore arc. I joined in 2022, so not sure what lore archtype was before that, but it seems pretty standard.