Yeah no I'm going to ask for what I want from the game, I don't care what Gaijin wants the game to be because they don't play this shit, they just roll around naked in our money.
you see i would tend to agree, but if give US mains control of the game, they would make a point and click adventure for themselves with no competition just to see others struggle, acting like US isnt strong already lmao. The feedback from them over the years proves that, so imma hand it to gaijin
@SovietUnion_ the middle for everyone is the siloution as always, I'd like for everything to be more pier pier balance and things to be moddled more correctly but ah well
@@DeathGodArgon you see that's surprisingly a rare mindset, US mains in particular want just buffs for themselves and nerfs for others, I keep seeing that in in-game chats and reddit and forums, thank god gaijin doesn't bend to them
The balance between realism and being a game is what made war thunder unique, like, its not too arcade nor too realistic, this is what make fun, like i got a high level of realism with easy controls of arcade games, you don't need a lot of time to learn things in game
Well, I want to see air arcade rework with simplified mechanics, kinda like AC7 but with more realistic FMs and physics. I think it`s not that hard to do.
Matt complaining others want shit Gaijin don't want to put in the game, when every other video is him complaining about the F-18 not being in the game yet, is kind of meh.
Literally every other video is “We need” “Will it be added” “What to expect” Yesterday or the day before dude is talking about the F18 and F22 and stealth jets being added with a whole TED talk on AESA/PESA radars.
I love your skins with the shape of the cockpit in black on the bottom sort of like a fish or butterfly with an eye pattern towards the tail or on the wings in order to confuse predators I think its really neat!
Я думаю, что WT просто прошел саой жизненный цикл. В наземку нечего добавлять, разве что новые клоны, футуристичную технику типа Abrams X или прототипы на более низкие ранги, но в целом нового геймплея это не даст У авиа есть потенциал развития, но бои в топах уже почти всегда отстрел ракет на 20-30 км и свалка, новые радары и ракеты ничего не поменяют "Наши ожидания - это наши проблемы" - фраза, которую можно увидеть от модератора на форуме, когда в очередной раз тебе закрывают тему с комментратием "не является ошибкой"
@@Avationplane777 и они добавят, с более современным вооружением. Но учитывая, что уже есть вооружение, эффективность которого ограничена не характеристиками, а движком игры(дистанцией рендера), не совсем понятно как они это введут в игру При добавлении новых самолётов, для совместных боем нужно будет добавить соответствующие их уровню зенитные комплексы Можешь себе представить геймплей за какой нибудь С-75 или западные аналоги? Лично я не могу
I totally understand what you mean. I want strategic bombers, cold war interceptors, submarines and playable carriers. I have waited for so many years and I keep getting disappointed. I think I should put these wishes into another game like sea power for example.
Hello I have watched the video and see your point about this matt but the only thing is on console we don't have access to DCS and other games ik people will say just get a pc and yes that is an option but I am one handed and can't use mouse and keyboard so I think it would make a great event vehicle as many before are useless at there br but some are too op or be as the 8.0-8.7 mark but great to hear your ideas and things like that other than that I did enjoy the video and seeing mig 29 gameplay ty for reading 😁
expect no fair matches or even a fair matchmaker, often in matches at 11 or higher the nemy team has more toptiers than my own ... if my onw even has some . Had several round where my team was 11.3 -11.7 and enemy team was 11.7 .12.3 . reported to the snail , got the answer : thats correct , no one said there must be the same number of tiers in every team.
Sorry but I think saying to lower your standards is a cop out for the war thunder devs. Specifically in regards to the bomber situation, what about all the ww2 bombers? Those are literally a perfect example of how strategic bombers work in game. And a lot of people like playing with those vehicles. As a community we have gotten extremely complacent considering the actual gameplay hasn't changed at all and when you combine that with streamers like yourself saying the game doesn't need these things because it's "fun enough" it leaves the devs to just do whatever they want and not what the players want. It would be so incredibly easy for gaijin to make new game modes with longer range maps and more objectives to make the game more dynamic and fun. I mean come on war thunder is one of the biggest money sinks in history I think we can get a game mode or two. Just like how people always said they won't add fox3s or missiles in general they were wrong. War thunder needs to evolve and you shouldn't be telling the players to lower their expectations so that the devs don't have to change the game.
So you know how Battlefield 4 is still going strong after 11 years? Not only that but BF4 is very similar in gameplay to BF3 so basically people having been playing BF3/4 for 13 years and having fun. Maybe some people don't like the modern gaming landscape where everything needs to massively change from year to year. Why do we gotta ruin gameplay for most people to squeeze bomber gameplay into the meta? Why reward low effort, low iq, low engagement gameplay instead of people actually trying to play in a fun way?
@@michaelvigil5321 just because your fun is fighters doesn't mean everyone else's is. Some people just want to hop on for an hour or two a day and get some grinding done and if bombers are their way to do that they should be allowed to. Why should we shape the whole game around one single playstyle?
@@michaelvigil5321 and to your battlefield comparison, battlefield is a lot more similar in gameplay to war thunder air Sim. Which I do agree is fun. But when the literal only mode you have is TDM shit gets boring. If war thunder had dynamic environments and huge open combined arms gameplay like battlefield maybe it would be just as fun but until they change stuff it's just not the same
Tu-95s, B-52s - i agree with that - These are cool looking aircraft, but they don't have a place in the current game meta. Look at the TU-4, Canbarras etc - they are mostly food because of gayjiggles very bad mapdesign
😂😂 strategic bombers are you kidding me they haven't even finished the models of the World War II bombers yet😅 what will be fun two see implemented would be stealth fighter and strike aircraft!
You don't earn much anymore with YT. Remember that this is his job now basically. If you'd have the opportunity of making some bucks more you would too, wouldnt you.
Damn I just got click baited by a Vulcan in a thumbnail
Yeah no I'm going to ask for what I want from the game, I don't care what Gaijin wants the game to be because they don't play this shit, they just roll around naked in our money.
you see i would tend to agree, but if give US mains control of the game, they would make a point and click adventure for themselves with no competition just to see others struggle, acting like US isnt strong already lmao.
The feedback from them over the years proves that, so imma hand it to gaijin
@SovietUnion_ the middle for everyone is the siloution as always, I'd like for everything to be more pier pier balance and things to be moddled more correctly but ah well
@@DeathGodArgon you see that's surprisingly a rare mindset, US mains in particular want just buffs for themselves and nerfs for others, I keep seeing that in in-game chats and reddit and forums, thank god gaijin doesn't bend to them
@@DrClef_1 I play the intire tt especially in air I want fun and accuracy lol
@@DrClef_1Honestly I just want more realistic flight models lol
The balance between realism and being a game is what made war thunder unique, like, its not too arcade nor too realistic, this is what make fun, like i got a high level of realism with easy controls of arcade games, you don't need a lot of time to learn things in game
Well, I want to see air arcade rework with simplified mechanics, kinda like AC7 but with more realistic FMs and physics. I think it`s not that hard to do.
What’s wrong with arcade
Perfectly said. A war thunder player not complaining. Rare. :)
IMO every bomber with a gun and/or AA missles should have a chance to be added to the WT techtrees...
That's a bit more feasible than modern-day strategic bombers lol
I would love to see the Vulcan and other nuclear capable strategic bomber be the nuclear bombers.
wouldn’t be a good idea, they’re slow and easy to kill. if you want new nuke carriers they need to be tactical bombers like the B-1 if anything
So, make nuclear bombers even easier to kill…..
I just want air sim to be more viable for RP and more realistic flight models
100%
Matt complaining others want shit Gaijin don't want to put in the game, when every other video is him complaining about the F-18 not being in the game yet, is kind of meh.
Literally every other video is “We need” “Will it be added” “What to expect”
Yesterday or the day before dude is talking about the F18 and F22 and stealth jets being added with a whole TED talk on AESA/PESA radars.
I love your skins with the shape of the cockpit in black on the bottom sort of like a fish or butterfly with an eye pattern towards the tail or on the wings in order to confuse predators I think its really neat!
Having strategic bomber will be useless they will just get shut down immediately, especially how top tier is
Yes the issue is with top tier, if they changed the gamemode to enduring confrontation and made the maps bigger strat bombers would fit right in
Strategic bombers would do just fine at 9.0 to 10.0 spawning at 10,000m
For protection they could add an incentive to escort the bombers like a decent rp or sl bonus
Я думаю, что WT просто прошел саой жизненный цикл. В наземку нечего добавлять, разве что новые клоны, футуристичную технику типа Abrams X или прототипы на более низкие ранги, но в целом нового геймплея это не даст
У авиа есть потенциал развития, но бои в топах уже почти всегда отстрел ракет на 20-30 км и свалка, новые радары и ракеты ничего не поменяют
"Наши ожидания - это наши проблемы" - фраза, которую можно увидеть от модератора на форуме, когда в очередной раз тебе закрывают тему с комментратием "не является ошибкой"
Просто новые модельки будут, но поверь, большинству этого достаточно
They should add new planes eventually
@@Avationplane777 и они добавят, с более современным вооружением. Но учитывая, что уже есть вооружение, эффективность которого ограничена не характеристиками, а движком игры(дистанцией рендера), не совсем понятно как они это введут в игру
При добавлении новых самолётов, для совместных боем нужно будет добавить соответствующие их уровню зенитные комплексы
Можешь себе представить геймплей за какой нибудь С-75 или западные аналоги? Лично я не могу
Yeah say they add just 1 5th gen fighter. The whole game would break if they give it its modern weapons.
I want the big bombers in the game. For targets to shoot down in ec and sim.
dose the alpha jet could get an aim 9p ?
I totally understand what you mean. I want strategic bombers, cold war interceptors, submarines and playable carriers. I have waited for so many years and I keep getting disappointed. I think I should put these wishes into another game like sea power for example.
Hello I have watched the video and see your point about this matt but the only thing is on console we don't have access to DCS and other games ik people will say just get a pc and yes that is an option but I am one handed and can't use mouse and keyboard so I think it would make a great event vehicle as many before are useless at there br but some are too op or be as the 8.0-8.7 mark but great to hear your ideas and things like that other than that I did enjoy the video and seeing mig 29 gameplay ty for reading 😁
SEA Power might BE very interesting
expect no fair matches or even a fair matchmaker, often in matches at 11 or higher the nemy team has more toptiers than my own ... if my onw even has some . Had several round where my team was 11.3 -11.7 and enemy team was 11.7 .12.3 . reported to the snail , got the answer : thats correct , no one said there must be the same number of tiers in every team.
Yes... Expecting devs not to shit on Sim Mode over and over again is expecting too much from the game... Right...
Watch them add modern bombers just to prove u wrong 😂
what can we expect next update for german jets ):
Swiss f5e maybe maybe
@@DownHereInChile i want a polish f16 ):
@@RalfG999 would be very cool 🙏
Blud you need to stop it 0:25 in Hungary
grahhhh
Sorry but I think saying to lower your standards is a cop out for the war thunder devs. Specifically in regards to the bomber situation, what about all the ww2 bombers? Those are literally a perfect example of how strategic bombers work in game. And a lot of people like playing with those vehicles. As a community we have gotten extremely complacent considering the actual gameplay hasn't changed at all and when you combine that with streamers like yourself saying the game doesn't need these things because it's "fun enough" it leaves the devs to just do whatever they want and not what the players want. It would be so incredibly easy for gaijin to make new game modes with longer range maps and more objectives to make the game more dynamic and fun. I mean come on war thunder is one of the biggest money sinks in history I think we can get a game mode or two. Just like how people always said they won't add fox3s or missiles in general they were wrong. War thunder needs to evolve and you shouldn't be telling the players to lower their expectations so that the devs don't have to change the game.
So you know how Battlefield 4 is still going strong after 11 years? Not only that but BF4 is very similar in gameplay to BF3 so basically people having been playing BF3/4 for 13 years and having fun. Maybe some people don't like the modern gaming landscape where everything needs to massively change from year to year. Why do we gotta ruin gameplay for most people to squeeze bomber gameplay into the meta? Why reward low effort, low iq, low engagement gameplay instead of people actually trying to play in a fun way?
@@michaelvigil5321 just because your fun is fighters doesn't mean everyone else's is. Some people just want to hop on for an hour or two a day and get some grinding done and if bombers are their way to do that they should be allowed to. Why should we shape the whole game around one single playstyle?
@@michaelvigil5321 and to your battlefield comparison, battlefield is a lot more similar in gameplay to war thunder air Sim. Which I do agree is fun. But when the literal only mode you have is TDM shit gets boring. If war thunder had dynamic environments and huge open combined arms gameplay like battlefield maybe it would be just as fun but until they change stuff it's just not the same
Vulcan pog
Tu-95s, B-52s - i agree with that - These are cool looking aircraft, but they don't have a place in the current game meta.
Look at the TU-4, Canbarras etc - they are mostly food because of gayjiggles very bad mapdesign
😂😂 strategic bombers are you kidding me they haven't even finished the models of the World War II bombers yet😅 what will be fun two see implemented would be stealth fighter and strike aircraft!
30 seconds ago wow
Help this man reach 50.000 subscribers by the end of the year!🗣🗣🗣
I hate R-77 it's hit friendly target 🎯 like hell.
first lol
Bro just wants the UA-cam money 💵
It’s not just that my friend mat is one of my favorite warthunder UA-camrs and his content is amazing
You don't earn much anymore with YT. Remember that this is his job now basically.
If you'd have the opportunity of making some bucks more you would too, wouldnt you.
UA-cam pays the most compared to all other websites
Shut he's a greate youtuber
@@krish0999 YT is the only relevant video page and its abysmal what they pay. Why you so jelly when someone earns 10 bucks more?