Government's INSANE Excuse for Gas Expansion

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 тра 2024
  • The Australian Government's Future Gas Strategy is policy from a backwards land where logic is reversed.
    And unlike what Resources Minister Madeleine King wants you to think, expanding fossil fuel use is NOT the path to “net zero”
    Senior Fellow and Contributing Editor Stephen Long explains.
    Sign up to get our latest analysis sent to you via our fortnightly newsletter!
    📧 theaus.in/newsletter
    Help us make more videos like this by becoming a supporter:
    ❤️ theaus.in/donateYT

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @carolinemaybe
    @carolinemaybe Місяць тому +9

    What on earth is it going to take for the Govt to stand up to the fossil fuel lobby.

  • @SW-lw6mt
    @SW-lw6mt Місяць тому +1

    How do we stop this madness?

  • @MarksElectricLife
    @MarksElectricLife Місяць тому +3

    Like “fighting for peace” or “screwing for virginity”, gassing for lower emissions is a logical contradiction. Hoping for more teal at the next election..

  • @beesplaining1882
    @beesplaining1882 Місяць тому +3

    Expanding the gas fields makes a lot of sense and will be highly beneficial (....for multinational Gas corporations!). 🙃

  • @russellgillick7938
    @russellgillick7938 Місяць тому +2

    Where has always trying to do the right thing gotten Labor ? In opposition for a decade.

    • @beesplaining1882
      @beesplaining1882 Місяць тому

      They were elected on a "small target" strategy after Shorten's election loss. They are in government now so its time to do something new not just do the same as Scomo did.

  • @nottenvironmental6208
    @nottenvironmental6208 Місяць тому +1

    Yay, higher energy prices, less jobs, inflation and loss of food production when we are the number 1 for renewable energy.

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 16 днів тому

    Very familiar smash and grab techniques available to Control Fraud crims.

  • @0ctatr0n
    @0ctatr0n 5 днів тому

    I'll be honest, I expected your voice to sound older and a lot more rural sounding, didn't expect the sound of a 40 something to come out :P

  • @alyssaoconnor
    @alyssaoconnor 13 днів тому

    I’ve being saying for years we should be moving towards the Norway model rather than the African, we need collateral to build a secure country and commonsense fiscal preparation, not the spend it to suck up model we have now.
    A lot of resources were borrowed to raise the largest generation the world has ever had (infrastructure, education and health) now Peter is knocking on Paul’s door and we cut alloparenting as well to do it, time to invest in the young not strip them of future resources for less than peanuts. There’s lots of repairing to do.

  • @jordymaas565
    @jordymaas565 Місяць тому +1

    u need to calm down.
    during eastern states drought 2002, this institute recommended ACT sue NSW farmers for dust pollution; FFS !!

  • @NathanCroucher
    @NathanCroucher Місяць тому +1

    If we dont export it, another country will. Maybe this wasnt labors choice.

    • @Splattle101
      @Splattle101 Місяць тому

      Doesn't mean we should subsidize them to do it.

    • @NathanCroucher
      @NathanCroucher Місяць тому

      @@Splattle101 Those subsidize end up in our super accounts, ie the majority voter. Its buying votes at the expense of society overall.

    • @patricktongs9766
      @patricktongs9766 Місяць тому +2

      Exports ok but ffs look after the people first,what we are paying parity with the Japanese wtf.

    • @ordan787
      @ordan787 Місяць тому +1

      "If I don't sell drugs to children, someone else might!"
      That's a terrible argument ??
      Why does someone else [doing bad thing] make it okay for us to [do bad thing]

    • @NathanCroucher
      @NathanCroucher Місяць тому

      @@ordan787 Your assuming its a choice. If we dont, some other country might come in and take over the job for us, perhaps a US sponsored freedom visit. That would be consistent with history.