How China Might Respond to Potential Tariffs Under Trump

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 92

  • @bz1138
    @bz1138 3 години тому +28

    tarrif will make both China and US suffer. But for Chinese in China, they can survive with some hardship and won't increase homeless people. For American in US, the price will skyrocket, homless people will drastically increase 100%.

    • @GPSniper1
      @GPSniper1 2 години тому +2

      Good. People voted for it

    • @Sportblogg
      @Sportblogg Годину тому

      @@bz1138 It just increases the price in the US. China buys its own products or foreign products produced in China. The dollar will drop and not be what everyone trades with internationally. These countries they talk about are small and poor. Now, for example, the EU will acquire similar tariffs that mean nothing for Europe, only for countries outside Europe.

    • @bz1138
      @bz1138 Годину тому

      @@Sportblogg Those who support the mushroom head are stupid and they complain about inflation under biden administration, but the inflation will be much higher soon after trump increase the tarriff. Those stupid people deserve the live a even bad life by supporting trump.

    • @1.4billion65
      @1.4billion65 Годину тому

      Is USA the only country in this world?

    • @M3.Lorenzo
      @M3.Lorenzo Годину тому +2

      Nah..... US imposed tariffs only affect the prices of millions of Chinese products sold in America, but has barely any impact on the already-low prices of the same products back in China.

  • @oki148
    @oki148 4 години тому +17

    US self-destruct with massive tariff ?? China will probably ignore the tariff, while continuing to trade with other countries, and boost internal consumption. 🤣🤣

    • @kolviczd6885
      @kolviczd6885 2 години тому

      Right. While America is still a big market for now, other emerging market can fill up the gap in the next 5-10 years easily. So no worries for China in the long run.

    • @carlosgamez6230
      @carlosgamez6230 42 хвилини тому

      My point exactly, why start a trade war with the country that manufactures almost everything for the world. Who’s gonna lose that war?? Oh that’s right us

  • @user-qc02590
    @user-qc02590 4 години тому +16

    Just like the ruling parties in Japan and South Korea who lost their majority in Parliament, the Democrats failed to listen to the concerns of ordinary people struggling with high inflation and high costs of living issues. But if Trump overdoes his threat of tariffs, it may cause more inflationary pressures and be counter-productive for not just America, but also its allies. Many countries will be caught in a dilemma between their biggest trade partner, China, and their ally, America.

    • @jasonmoser8957
      @jasonmoser8957 54 хвилини тому

      Trump wants tariffs, he wants migrants out (who do all the hard labor), he wants to cut taxes, he wants to slash and burn the gov't including servies and support poorer people need. The people he has are not ones who do things moderately. He is going to hurt the US economy - see Argentina flirtation with radical cutting of gov't. China has an opportunity to play the good guy to Trump's bad guy.

  • @RM-fe6ye
    @RM-fe6ye 4 години тому +20

    The tariffs will pass down to the consumers… isn’t this common sense?

    • @SkyOrbiter-v2g
      @SkyOrbiter-v2g 4 години тому

      Depends on the product.

    • @Leon-y2g
      @Leon-y2g 3 години тому

      @@SkyOrbiter-v2gcrack is the product of

    • @tat3179
      @tat3179 3 години тому

      Yes it is. Only idiots believe what Trump says about tarriffs. The US NEEDS the basic chemicals that China produces, for instance.

    • @sed9406
      @sed9406 37 хвилин тому

      Not to cold war German Marshall fund knucklehead.

    • @chdv5736
      @chdv5736 18 хвилин тому

      @@SkyOrbiter-v2g? What do you mean

  • @thomasrogers9146
    @thomasrogers9146 4 години тому +5

    I AM NOT A POLITICIAN..I AM A BUSINESS MAN.. THE U.S MARKET IS 336 MILLION PEOPLE ON A WORLD OF 8 BILLION PEOPLE..OUR GOVERNMENT DEBT IS 35 TRILLION AND COUNTING, OUR CONSUMER DEBT IS OVER 1 TRILLION DOLLARS. CHINA HAS 1.4 BILLION PEOPLE WITH A MASSIVE DOMESTIC MARKET 4X OUR SIZE WITH AN ESTIMATED 14 TO 18 TRILLION DOLLARS IN DOMESTIC SAVINGS AND A TRADE SURPLUS OF 100 BILLION DOLLARS A MONTH. CHINA IS THE WORLD'S LARGEST CONSUMER MARKET, LARGEST TRADING PARTNER, LARGEST INVESTOR BELT AND ROAD AND IS DOMINATING 57 OUT OF 64 LEADING TECHNOLOGIES INCLUDING FILING PATENTS. MY QUESTION TO MY FELLOW AMERICANS HOW ARE AMERICAN COMPANIES GOING TO COMPETE GLOBALLY.? ESPECIALLY IN THE EMERGING ECONOMIES 88% OF THE GLOBAL POPULATION WITH RISING POPULATIONS AND EMERGING ECONOMIES?

    • @EPHLLC
      @EPHLLC 2 години тому

      By using "alternative facts".

    • @4mb127
      @4mb127 2 години тому

      Chinese export model is completely unsustainable. They have next to zero domestic consumption and they crush labor. High degree of corruption and nepotism. Everything is swept under the rug. Yes, they have many great companies and their manufacturing is top tier. But it all comes at a terrible cost.

    • @kolviczd6885
      @kolviczd6885 2 години тому

      WOW! You are one very rare American who is asking the right question. The majority Americans are still in denial that the biggest threat to America is America itself, not China or Russia.
      Tariffs and trade restrictions will not make America great again, sanctioning China from semiconductor chip and high end technology will not make America strong, instead it is a signal of weakness and the whole world could see it.
      America's best bet to stay longer as the biggest power in the world is to focus on America and American people within their own border instead of waging countless war and proxy war all over the world. The world as a whole is changing, not just China's rise, and America have to learn to live with other in mutual respect. Those days where America completely dominated the world Affairs is over and it's not coming back soon. Make some adjustment, give space for others too and live in peace with others, otherwise more troubles are coming America's way especially after 2050s.

    • @imadkhaliq2941
      @imadkhaliq2941 Годину тому

      ​@@4mb127have you by any chance visited China or did you get your news from western media? Either way Facts remain that China is nothing like you mentioned.

    • @fifty01
      @fifty01 Годину тому

      @@4mb127keep thinking that. I see you’re still stuck in the old thinking and not keeping up with what’s happening locally in China. It will keep you and others in a false sense of security.

  • @drunkntigr
    @drunkntigr Годину тому +1

    Tariffs increase the price of imported and local goods. Imported goods become less in demand and demand increases for local goods that drives prices up of locally made products causing a net increase in prices to the consumer overall. The importers pay the tariffs, not the exporter so in the end the government wins and the consumer loses.

  • @sotong1113
    @sotong1113 5 годин тому +19

    Interesting the speaker like to use the China aggression .. i thought is USA aggressive rather than China. Bias view and wonder if put so many books but wonder any Asia history books before opinioning and able to provide better views.

    • @Nik-ik8mv
      @Nik-ik8mv 5 годин тому

      China is a master mercantalist and expert in economic warfare which it uses regularly against foreign companies, individuals, and small countries.

    • @4mb127
      @4mb127 2 години тому

      You didn't actually refute the point that China is aggressive.

    • @arvinzhou7167
      @arvinzhou7167 2 години тому +1

      @@Nik-ik8mv Replacing China with the United States is also applicable, it's really amazing

    • @sed9406
      @sed9406 36 хвилин тому

      ​@@4mb127Not to cold war German Marshall fund knucklehead.

  • @sapaiyo9810
    @sapaiyo9810 Годину тому +2

    First of all, stop using the term "Indo-Pacific". There is no "Indo-Pacific", it is "Asia-Pacific". You do not hear "Indo-Pacific" before 2016, it is all part of US strategies to coin the term "Indo-Pacific" and promote a containment policy and potentially bring chaos into the region. India is part of South Asia and they have no share common culture with the East and South Eas Asia.

    • @RudraSingh08309
      @RudraSingh08309 58 хвилин тому

      😂😂Yes, FREE TIBET and Xingjian from CHINA and We Indians are not Asians we are Bhartiya's we are a Civilization more than 10 Thousand years old . Tell ur CCP Masters to educate you more on Indo-Pacific and why ur XI Jinping " Winni The Pooh" got humbled at LAC 😂😂

    • @joeyau2428
      @joeyau2428 40 хвилин тому

      ​@RudraSingh08309 stop the raping of women in India.

    • @ChengsHardware
      @ChengsHardware 19 хвилин тому +1

      @@RudraSingh08309 油管五常

    • @naruto6918
      @naruto6918 7 хвилин тому

      better would be china-pacific 😂as China is not only in Asia, Even the word Asian for East asia is also made by US.

  • @BrandyHeng007
    @BrandyHeng007 5 годин тому +9

    Tit-for-Tat
    Counter destructive capability
    Never fear....fight,fight

    • @Nik-ik8mv
      @Nik-ik8mv 5 годин тому +1

      China will lose far more because its trade relationship with US is predatory and drastically assymetric. While US exports to China barely $150B of goods, China exports $500B with transshipments, tariffs evasion, third country exporting in the range of $300B. That's why China doesn't want decoupling because it doesn't want to lose its biggest customer. Sure US farmers will be hurt slightly but they will be bailed out. On the other hand, with this level of tariffs and US markets closing, Chinese deindustrialization and job losses, hence societal instability and cohesion breakdown , and unemployment are inevitable as happened in past with US. China weaponizes its market to silence and suppress foreign companies, individuals, and small countries. We will see when US weaponizes the biggest market on planet against CCP. China will get test of its medicine. If Chinese markets are closed for foreign companies, US markets should totally close for Chinese companies. Many countries then will use US playbook to counter China. Chinese economy is nothing without exports. And exports depend on your trade partner's will, not on domestic weaponized market. As foreign markets close with US starting the process, CCP will grapple with same problems that it exported to West in last 4 decades - massive deindustrialization, jobs lost, huge unemployment, societal cohesion breakdown, vast inequalities, and real national and societal crisis as is now happening throughout West thanks to predatory economic and trade policies of CCP. It would be nice to see this experiment on China as it performed this experiment on West in last 4 decades.

    • @jjian5
      @jjian5 5 годин тому +1

      ​@@Nik-ik8mv And who enables these trades? Surely it is not American themselves right?

    • @tat3179
      @tat3179 3 години тому

      @@Nik-ik8mv Both will lose. After all, the US still NEED, not want, NEED goods that are made in China Industries needs components like basic chemicals. People still need white goods and other things to have a nice 1st world lifestyle. The problem with the US is whether you like it or not, only China has the supply chain that could fulfill the US's needs, so yes, whether Trump likes it or not, trade with China will continue, because only China can supply them at the quantity, quality, speed and the price that suits the US. Regardless of what Trump says, it is impossible to replicate the Chinese supply chain at acceptable cost and quantity needed in the US in 4 years. China took more than 20 years to build their supply chain and we are talking about a country that has a very powerful central government that solely focused in building said supply chains for manufacturing.
      In conclusion, if Trump imposes the tarriffs, the US consumers will simply pay more in many goods. Chinese imports of critical goods will continue. End of Story.

    • @Nik-ik8mv
      @Nik-ik8mv 3 години тому

      @@tat3179 No. Maybe the price not be same but China doesn't manufacture all of world's basic chemicals or white goods or any other good. It manufacturers 35% of the world's output, not 100%. Every Chinese manufacturing sector has competitors in US, India, ASEAN, Japan, Korea, EU. They have been overly subsidized that's why they are dominant but that doesn't mean alternative suppliers don't exist. The goal is not to overnight build US manufacturing but massively raise tariff barriers to Chinese and other goods so investment will pretty quickly ramp up in US and as has continued under Biden, plants will start producing all these goods in US. In the meantime, US can source from US, ASEAN, India, EU, Japan, Korea or from elsewhere. Do you think nobody makes white goods except China? Basic chemicals? US has literally many manufacturers but they are hurt by cheap imports. If imports are essentially blocked, US importers will have to source from US itself by hook or crook. It's the purpose of tariffs - forcing production in US and forcing US suppliers to source from US manufacturers. It's your and ccp's hubris that only China can be supplier. Block Chinese goods and in sufficient time, market will grow competitors and competitors will gain scale and speed if they are only source and market demand is locked in. US can source cheap goods from anywhere but China cannot find a market as large as that of America.

    • @kingseiryu929
      @kingseiryu929 3 години тому

      @@Nik-ik8mv ​ Nope, US needs China more than China needs US.
      China has rare resources like rare earths which is essential in producing electronics like phone. If US issues tariffs on Chinese goods, the Americans will turn to US goods.
      Which is good for them in the short run. BUT the US companies dont have sufficient supply. What happens? The price of US goods go skyhigh.
      Who bears the cost? American consumers 🤣🤣🤣
      Meanwhile, China is starting BRICS just for that purpose of finding new markets.
      I am not a China supporter btw. Just speaking truth.
      Every single time the US started the trade war against China, US lost.
      You can check, the trade war was supposed to be a severe blow against China but since 2021, China enjoyed a healthy gdp
      It just doesn’t work China have other ways of selling their goods

  • @Danielzsy
    @Danielzsy 24 хвилини тому

    Nobody can escape social rules, even though he is an American president.

  • @passby8070
    @passby8070 9 хвилин тому

    With 60% of Americans living from pay check to paycheck. A 60% tax on imports will not only affect just those goods, but also the ingredients and parts that contributed to a locally made products. Medicine price will increase, along with cars and other machineries that use some chinese parts. Also bear in mind alot of the products that is made in China cannot be substituted immediately by a third country so Americans will need to bear the consequence of the tariffs hike.

  • @leecheelek
    @leecheelek 30 хвилин тому

    Why should China bother much about the Tariffs and US market? It can live without the USA (just less trade) while it transition to the BRICS+ markets and domestic markets. Trump is a businessman and I wouldn't be surprised he might even contemplate joining BRICS+ for a bigger share of the world market in future. Just imagine if China just like Russia stops all trade with the USA while most Western countries are now in the middle of recession or very slow growth.

  • @RudraSingh08309
    @RudraSingh08309 Годину тому

    TRUMP The Hungry and Angry HAWK is Back 🙏🙏

  • @HDCreative-u4u
    @HDCreative-u4u 3 години тому

    Many countries still haven’t learned the lesson-they’re continuing to rely heavily on the U.S. market. Well, good luck with that. If you’re still depending solely on the U.S. for trade, then you haven’t quite grasped the importance of not putting all your eggs in one basket, mate.

  • @jemler3speak
    @jemler3speak 3 години тому +1

    The tariffs will be off if those Chinese companies abide by Yellen's cronies rules, let them take a fat piece of that pie, but I guess BYD, Huawei, DJI prefer doing vertical launch factory stores and deliver directly to customers, huge win-win for makers and customers, not so much for those middle bogeyman😊

  • @stark-tonny
    @stark-tonny 4 години тому

    😂Xi just made a dont-play-with -fire statement to Trump

  • @HIMANSHU79879
    @HIMANSHU79879 22 хвилини тому

    I see only 4 major countries in the world today that are real serious "buisness" country USA RUSSIA INDIA CHINA... europe is doormat of usa ( western europe especially) , ukraine is led by comedian, west asia perpetual fights.

  • @paul5475
    @paul5475 3 години тому

    Equal Trade is a must! Should be fair.

    • @bz1138
      @bz1138 3 години тому

      Free trade is fair trade. Equal or not, it doesn't matter. You can force lazy people in one country to work more to export to another country.

  • @shankarbalakrishnan2360
    @shankarbalakrishnan2360 5 годин тому

    The older u get the more u compromise with life which will result in hurtingvurself and others and wont move forward sacrifice but not other souls❤❤🎉🎉

  • @yortroei
    @yortroei 33 хвилини тому

    it comes down to spending culture. averge americans just spend too much on stuff they dont need nor can afford. asisans are taught to spend more conservatively and put in savings.

  • @chdv5736
    @chdv5736 19 хвилин тому

    Do nothing, win

  • @lovechineseforever9434
    @lovechineseforever9434 3 години тому

    COMEDY

  • @paul5475
    @paul5475 3 години тому +1

    The Philippines support Trump

    • @liewkinglim
      @liewkinglim 3 години тому

      Yaaa! We think Americans

    • @TheAlbert18361
      @TheAlbert18361 Годину тому +1

      Supporting Trump to dump u guys in the south China sea issue 😂?

    • @sed9406
      @sed9406 35 хвилин тому +1

      Lol. He will sell you for craps

  • @eespn4764
    @eespn4764 5 годин тому

    Is she a china supporter 😅 by words and phrases it seems😂

    • @Finesser-94
      @Finesser-94 Годину тому +1

      No you’re just slow

    • @LaPlaya-rw1cp
      @LaPlaya-rw1cp Годину тому

      No, you are bought for and paid by some Chinese Propaganda spreading org.​@@Finesser-94

  • @ltshakir2602
    @ltshakir2602 2 години тому

    As long as you have China's sovereignty in circuit with military aggression I would not do trade with you at all