If you replace jobs for people then it mean no income people. When people have no income, they are unable to buy. When people are unable to buy who will the robots build stuff for?
You will have Super barons, like Mark Zuckenberg, Larry page ,Sergei Brin, Elon Musk,kuzweil, Bill Gates, Obama, François Hollande, Georges Bush,Netanyahu , just to name a few, who will be the overlords of the world. They will either starve, genocide or use the other billions of people as slaves, sex laves in case of the women. Imagine you have Robots working for you, they system and the police are paid by you, you can do anything. Will they choose evil or Good? Elon musk got ten children on his own but he advise the rest of the population to restring at having children . Larry Page is designing his children to be genetically perfect and he is also working on his longevity, tweaking his DNA editing in other to reach 200 years. All those future clans will want their progénitures to multiply and take up the lands of undesirable, defective humans like us. Only engeneers, like them, will survive
Errrr... ever watched Divergent? (& possibly every other movie in that genre) that's where the world is going. Maybe not the crazy destruction... but definitely 'factions' ultimately it wont be about money anymore.
+jaime almonte I forgive you, for you are judging me because you can't t undrstand me and you are limited by a so poor experience life experience . Forthough, anticipation, analytic from the past and present doesn't need weed for mind clarity, I just need coffe and a good sleep . I didn't mean that those events would certainly happened, but since I do know that history is a perpetual wheel who redo itself perpetually , It's easy then to feagure the consequences of a powegrab by a minority. The powerful CEO, billionaires it today remind me of the divers warlords that shares the italium territory during the Ancient Roman era.
Can you think of how any of us will save for retirement when we have to constantly stop our lives shell out 20 grand to learn new skills because our old skills were made obsolete. The future of work is going to be horrible.
This video assumes most people will be able to struggle and not get "left behind." The reality is that vast numbers of people are and will be "left behind," so society is going to have to deal with that. This new automation doesn't create anywhere near as many jobs as it takes over. Is it the growing welfare state that has put the US $20 trillion in debt?
These vast numbers of people might not accept their faith just as the French didn't in 1789 and as the Russians didn't in 1917, a dangerous path this is.
General ignorance is the problem. If machines are capable of doing the work why in the world would we have to hang on the old Concepts like Monetary Exchange? It's automated an autonomous technology is capable of doing the work and are capable of producing an abundance there's no reason to have Monetary Exchange. Without Monetary Exchange we can simply solve problems and offer goods and services without a price tag.
@MrHoppers002 Please tell me you don't seriously believe this horse crap? We millennials we Generation Z are the next ones to take on this world why would we do that to each other when there is a clear solution. We have live so long with money that some people are not capable of seeing past such a concept but you forget that it was simply a tool and tools can become outdated Obsolete and be replaced by better systems. Look up a resource-based economy and that's what we're going to do if machines are doing the work there is no longer than need to hold on to the concept of money this is not a pipe dream or science fiction this is clearly reality. There's no need for any man woman or child after fight or struggle to get the needs of life and there is plenty enough to have access to any good or service you could ever want.
I am not worried about robots replacing human labor, what I am worried about is how humans deal with this change. Ownership and wealth is different from productivity and resources. High productivity lead by robots will allow humans to have a higher standard of living. People from less developed countries could have a quantum leap in living standard. Now, the important part is how the government and private industry could work together to guide the public through this transition from a labor intensive society to a post labor society. Once people no longer need to work 40 hours a week, what should they do with all the free time. As a result, what types of industries would grow to fulfil the extra leisure time.
No extra jobs or work hours. Just more free time to explore, discover, and invent new techniques and technologies and spend time with friends and family.
Start growing your own food and become self sustainable! And get a technical job where robots cant replace you, well atleast replace you for the next 100 yrs!
Technology is too volatile and changig at too fast of a pace for you to be able to predict a job where you can't be replaced in 100 years... I don't think, from now on, there will be a irreplaceable job that stays irreplaceable for that long...
Learning how to learn fast and adapt yourself to getting as much out of your current job is key. I work in technology and I came in with the understanding that my job will probably not survive the decade and I'll probably need to learn the role that is up and coming.
no industry is safe. I work as a 3d animator, and while it is more future proof than a driving or manufacturing job what is to say that a more advanced ai cant make faster more consistent decisions always on show style. not only that it could animate hundreds of thousands of frames per day for the cost of the electricity to run its still way to early now but eventually even creative professional jobs can be automated
Even if sufficient new jobs were to be created, they'd be tech jobs, requiring degrees or high-end skills. The poor and the stupid will just become poorer. South Korea is testing out a new robot that'll deliver a pizza instead of a person. Say goodbye to delivery jobs.
@@godisgreat418I bought the robot company miso robotics 3kthousand into its estimated to be worth 3.5 billion every year I could be looking at millions every year 😂
What worries me is that the increased productivity would lead to unprecedented wealth for the already rich while depriving millions of a chance at decent living. Society in India is not conducive to involve equality....
The solution is creating decentralized, self sufficient, government and big corporation independent communities with their own local food production (permaculture, synthropic farming, food forests, agroforestry, electorculture, biodynamic farming etc), healing systems, cash money (not issued for interest which creates perpetual debt). If people live this way, the big entities (governments, banks, mega corporations, organized religions etc) which control our world today, loose their workers, customers and become obsolete. For this to work, you have to start thinking, acting. A large portion of humanity is not willing to do this yet, because they want comfort, even at the cost of self destruction. When the oppression of the globalist cabal becomes more and more unbearable, this might change.
Great video both visually and good information. Straight to the point and no sugar-coating or BS to help people "remain calm". Job reports are bogus, weekly average earnings keep going down, and as many millennials live with their parents since the 1960's. Nothing is safe anymore not even accounting. Thanks baby boomers. On a more positive side, thanks for taking the time to read this (if you did).
let's follow this to it's natural conclusion: less people working means less tax revenue and more people taking government assistance. So the government, in response to the changing landscape of employment and the needs of people, will raise corporate taxes order to redistribute wealth back amoung the people since the corporations are no longer paying the people directly through wages. The unemployed, meanwhile, will not be burdened with a menial job 50 hours per week, and can thus spend time with their children and spouse and explore their hobbies for personal fulfillment. Henceforth a utopia is born and society rejoices at their new found freedom from the shackles of corporate America.
The reality is the fact that more "middle class" will be pushed into poverty and corporations simply outsources the jobs and profit overseas to dodge healthcare and taxes obligations. Nations will bankrupt themselves by over printing and over borrowing money. Weaken finance and job securities will lead to xenophobia and favor even more cuts on social benefits and government healthcare spending. Eventually, governments across the globe will lose power over these multi national & multi industries companies, taxing them even less and deregulation will be the theme of the future. The "modernization" system is heading for total disaster.
Where are the corporations going to get more money from if nobody has jobs? They'll be destroyed as well, its in their best interest for UBI to be a thing.
More likely that the army becomes made up of drones and AI. When the elites realize you are not contributing to their wealth , they have no need for you and send you to a special camp by force.
I work at a warehouse my job has just gotten these new automated walkie riders which drives itself to the location it’s needs to go too. Now although no one has gotten fired yet but we notice a huge change in hiring. We used to get a new hire almost every Monday for the last four months since we got these walkie riders we haven’t gotten a new person. We know why but it just sad to see that one simple machine took away jobs from people who are out there looking for a way to get paid.
What’s the probability of YOUR job being replaced by a robot? ---> ua-cam.com/video/_OV1z1MJ9dA/v-deo.html We want to help you stay informed with our bite sized data!
How do these companies expect customers to buy their technologically innovative products if no one has money to spend because their job has been automated?
More than 40% of the American population makes less than $15/hr. I suppose the powers that be expect those people who are replaced by technology to find a way to survive on their own.
3:00 they may be able to understand language, recognize faces, and compose music, but they don't understand what it means. To a machine a language is just words that don't convey a meaning, faces are gust images that don't do anything, and music is just sound.
I'm a drafter. I trained in 2D drafting and a little bit of 3D modeling. But BIM, at some point will take a lot of jobs away for drafters. It just makes it a lot easier for engineers to get the design work done without giving it to someone else. I'm not too happy about this seeing that I started my pro drafting career 1.5 years ago. An engineering degree really isn't to my liking. Hopefully in the near future I can get a architectural degree and not have to worry so much about my present career path being taken away from me.
Have you ever heard of the Venus Project? The founder Jaque fresco worked his whole life 80+ years on designing a world without money. Where machines can take care 90%+ jobs (back in the 50s so you take a guess where were at now). I'd recommend looking them up! You will not be dissapointed.
While these developments can lower production costs and improve efficiency, the savings can be utilized to expand operations and to re-skill and redeploy workers.
robot maintenance can be automated by building maintenance robots to service the rest... new robot design is done by artificial intelligence... not humans no human is needed at any point... they can never compete with the machine
@@ethangray8527 i guess so, but as soon as you start to include biological components in a system, you have slowed it down dramatically, and added a lot of vulnerability
Yeah I think machines are supposed to be made for work with human not for complete replacement (like pilots still have their jobs while computer is doing the routine job). Or we're gonna face lots of problems, cause if machines start replace people for providing goods, people will start saving their money and start spend less money on things they don't need to survive. So idk if we're ready for that. I mean let's say you can find another job right, and most of the jobs will be connected to computers and programming, but what if there are people who are not interested in making money, but have a genuine interest in their profession (like doctors or pilots) what if career is more important for them.
that is 100% true but also this paragraph im about to wright tell you why we even though we will lose alot of jobs we will gain alot more Somehow we are increasing the amount of human labor even though we are trying to decrease the amount of human labor ie. banks etc. Machines really depend on us to keep them working and for them to be used by customers and employers etc. and also the machines increase the importance of our work, judgement and creativity. Technology is removing the middle class jobs but drastically increasing lower and higher class jobs. We now have smarter students for jobs because we need to stay in school until we are 16 at least but recommended 18 instead of 14.
The threat to medical practitioners is highly oversold here. Making those jobs easier may mean that demand for those jobs won't grow as fast, we're a long way from not needing an radiology tech assistant or whatever and radiologist. I assume lots of driving jobs will go away, some to be replaced with security guard, often armed, for instance moving along with a set of trucks.
technology has reached its peak in 1990s now its advancing faster than ever and now its used to cut cost to companies and to compromise cost and quality technology has so much advanced because of human expansion and the governments allow something to happen that they shouldn't allow just to get money in the form of license and tax, technology makes jobs unstable and stress full, it takes you further and further away from a natural life, it can help you as long as you are young or rich......
And how will companies make money if people have no money to buy their shit? and if money wouldn't be a thing anymore the lifestyle that would exist with our dependence on robots sounds decadent, even without them society is already decadent.
The problem is simple. The very concept of jobs & the need to have a job is becoming obsolete. Automation means less work for humans to do. Yet, the economic model still demands high employment rates. The concept of jobs is fast becoming obsolete. The need to have people work for money is fast becoming obsolete. Putting the economy before people & the planet is patently wrong.
Technology creates more jobs than it kills. Technology kills traditional jobs but creates new jobs via new entrepreneurship opportunities. Whilst it's true many jobs have been replaced by tech/automation many more jobs via entrepreneurship opportunities have been unlocked by the same technology. Examples: New set of entrepreneurship (mobile phones & money, talktime dealership etc that never existed 30 years ago) people making fortunes thro blogging, youtubing etc Millions of tech jobs in the IT industries: Web developer. ... Apple genius. ... SEO consultant. ... App Developer. ... UX designer. ... Cloud services specialist. ... Software engineer technicians Social media manager. There was no need for these professionals until social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram became mainstream. ... Digital marketer. ... Wind energy engineer. ... Drone pilot. ... App developer control room monitors
If technology was good enough everything would be free because the only real important jobs would be maintaining technology and making sure it’s doing what it’s suppose to. Because if technology was large enough r would be able to automatically pick up garbage, package food, make food after automatically planting crops and automatically watering them, feeding people, automatically making a massage bed to automatically massage you, etc. Basically jobs wouldn’t be necessary because we’d be able to still meet all our basic needs. Although we’d still be able to be creative and share ideas with each other . I would hope an industrial revolution happens so everything is free and we can be more like a community and share ideas
This is the thing: AI do not have a need for money. If enough people get skilled to program AI, the computers will be cheaper. But only people need money. So I see goods becoming cheaper and real stuff thats requires a human touch emerging and become bigger. So a shift in how it happens. Money was created to create a system between people, not machines...
All of you talking about how this will make poor people poorer... Have you ever thought that the economy will also change in reflection of this? Stop being so fearful of change, get ready to adapt. All the people I read here that are complaining are just scared of not being good enough.
Dude, you're being overly dramatic with no need to be. You have the internet which is amazing information and you don't need a university degree to learn things. You can do so many free courses, you can read stuff. You don't have to have information spoon fed. That's the problem, people think you only learn in school and disregard the fact that learning is a synonym for life. If you're willing to always grow and learn then you'll soon see that all of your rant is just that... A rant.
That's fine, but you realize for that "scholarly source", you are going to pay one hell of a hefty premium. Average colleges are at least 30k tuition, many reputable and better programs cost a couple hundred to a couple thousand for the entire experience (bootcamps, self teaching through online courses). In the majority of cases the alternative has actually been MUCH more effective at preparing people vocationally. The advantage of the college degree is that it buys you more credibility with employers, but this is for the most artificial of reasons. Having a prestigious degree DOES NOT equal capability , a degree is just an easy marker to gauge on for an employer, not a reliable one. I personally would rather pay for the cheaper alternative that teaches me all the foundations to develop a practical skill so I can create my own credability. Colleges also have a tendency of making you learn how to do stuff with really outdated tools....
There will always be shortsighted dummies around, that's just the way it is. Industrialist morons who are too stubborn to realize all the benefits of automated hard labor. They rather put poor people there so that they can have their backs broken at the age of 30 and die at 50. Utter morons. The economy will absolutely change from this. People can still become Doctors, therapists and what not. Computers by todays means will never outperform a human being, a computer is purely logical, a human is so much more which means that you still need people to take decisions. While you might not need doctors to perform surgery or analyze a patient, you still need them for other things. A utopia also requires everyone to want everything well for everyone else, and that is very far from what the world looks like, nor will be able to form for a long time, that would require you to disassemble all the current political systems, capitalism and so on, that's not gonna happen.The more work that is being over taken by robotics, the less people have to work in general. This will neither be centralized like many seem to piss their pants about, anyone with enough brain capacity will be able to produce software and hardware architectures needed for this, it should in theory also make the general population smarter which apparently is very much needed. There will also be poor people in this either way, but the difference is that the rich will not be low IQ unskilled people like many are today. The smarter you are, the higher you will rise, and that would give the dummies a chance to start using their brains more. Now, developing computers and such requires a lot more than just knowledge, it also requires a lot of intelligence (which doesn't always go hand in hand), and intelligence is a lot harder to learn, so they wont stand equal to the ones who are naturally more intelligent. Today more knowledge and intelligence does not mean more money at all, that part is more about greed than anything. It's not difficult to find a way to make huge sums of money, but a lot of people have higher moral standards than what that requires, and the ones who don't are mostly the elites. Think about this for a second, this example is taken from something I thought of a lot lately. A network technician for example doesn't need 5% of the knowledge of a low level software engineer, and yet in many cases the network technician makes a lot more money. People are getting terribly ripped off, and they don't have a single clue about it.
Technology want everybody to be engineer one day. But practically its not possible. It seems like only engineer & scientist jobs will be available in future. You are over optimistic. Take of your pink googles so that you can see the reality.
You think that 50 % of the jobs that will disappear in 2030 are done by 50 % of the active population ? More like 90 % of the workers are in the 50 % jobs that will disappear, the rest being more qualified and creative works. Maybe the 10 % jobs that will disappear in 2020 are done by 40 % of the population.
One answer is found in a profession that many find intimidating even though this profession gives the average person the best opportunity to succeed in creating time/financial freedom. Network Marketing.
AI will not replace jobs, but rather upgrade them, making them more efficient and as a result creating new jobs and methods for completing the same job. These new jobs where AI will then be a part of will require new training. However, I must add that our privacy will be almosy nil...but no one will focus on that. We will be too much in aww of the never experienced tech. Everything will be smart, and will have be constantly collecting data in order to do its job effectively...like this smart phone that I'm typing with, that constantly listens to everything that is said around it.
@@mjt1517 I work in transportation and there are companies already working on autonomous vehicles, so I'm concerned and I'm in my early 30s. That's why I'm planning on learning a new skill which can lead to running my own business.
Technology has always been replacing jobs… with different jobs. It’s been happening since the industrial revolution and is nothing new. Old jobs become obsolete and replaced by new jobs. Jobs in the horse and buggy industry were replaced by jobs in the automobile industry… and so forth.
Taxing robots? That will just hold back the technology for a while until someone works out an AI that can run the entire economy through a system of keystroke spending and debt jubilee to give consumer incomes. Might be a good idea to discuss the pros and cons as foreseen.
Automation Tax is the answer if Company's want too kill jobs with automation they can pay more Tax. Very simple and very fair if a machine takes away a Tax Payer then the Machine can pay the Tax. Sadly this wont happen and what will happen is Billions will be lost in Tax Revenue because their will be less workers therefore less Tax Payers. Billions more will have too be payed in Welfare costs. The only winners will the the Owners of the Companys and the CEOs will be get Huge Bonuses.
Companies and corporations want automation to increase their greed, but in the end it will be to their.own demise. Millions less human customers who cannot afford the products.
There is already a shift in employment. Money cash payment is getting less more electronic payments r coming about. I am all for this as a new world is being born and that is great. More time with family more tax for the corporations that pay for the down side of this. More training for the new kids around and more efficacy is born. People have too adjust and work together more as we have and should of been. This will stop greed too a point. I am a taxi driver a veteran as well. Driverless cars and more time with the family..
Here's the thing though, If all companies become fully automated, then there will be no more employment. If there is no more employment, people will have no money. If no-one will have money, who's going to buy the products these automated companies are producing?? If there's no-one to buy their products, what do you think will happen to these companies?? Sales👎 Now, do these companies still think going fully automated will benefit them on the long run??
Also, think about it, if you don't have employees, and people in general don't have jobs, then we don't have money, and well, no customers. What's the point in production if you have no customer? People will always have some kind of jobs. Even those who make bronze tools today have their customers. Some people are interested in bronze knives and kitchen utensils. It seems like a lot of people don't know what automatization and AI is capable of, because people are usually afraid of what they don't understand
there will be the wealthy elite class who own the AI and robots, and they will be each others customers buying each others robots and services and power... but the average person will have nothing to spend on products and no work
Not all mechanical systems will have full autonomy. A burger flipping robot will just be a machine built for flipping burgers. It would make no sense for it to have self awareness or a broad scope of intelligence.
Oh wow, it's true. We will have to be constantly learning new skills to stay employable and survive. We are already doing it. Especially older people, but I just didn't realize that it's already happening.
Put people out of work and who is going to buy the products? People lose their homes which increases dependency on social programs. But without taxes coming in from those out of work, it just gets worse. Who will pay to help those people transition to a new job?
I have already seen the impacts of AI and technology. I havent stop any banking for last 6 months(just online banking). That means I allowed atleast 1 employee to lose his/her job. In retail I like self check out, it means managers to reduce labour cost and increase automation. 15% of shopping I do it online. I think if you are like me, we are helping few people to be rich(minimzing through auto) and millions people(including mom,dad..) are losing their jobs. From tommorow I will take actions and I have to change my online behaviour. Did i mention, I am losing many friends because I use internet alot? Yes, I cant remember when I had a good time with my best friends. It sad.
Omar you can't hold back progress, the future is coming no matter what... human jobs will start to dry up. if you ran a store that had humans working there, your prices would have to be much higher to pay them all... but the store down the street is all automatic, self service and the prices are far cheaper... you can just decide to stick with the old system
Add eye glass lens grinder and cutter. Currently, this requires minimal vocational training and certification, not university work. So, bye skilled workers.
Not investment advice Maybe if you do have a few extra dollars (even just $20/month), put it into different companies that will benefit from this. At least you're somewhat hedged against automation. Not investment advice
Even today, we have millions of people who can't even finish high school then want welfare checks for the rest of their lives. You honestly think people are going to learn new skills constantly as you say at (5:10)? The big problem with the future is we are killing no-skill jobs for high-skill jobs. Sure, driverless cars create jobs, but not the same job as simply sitting on your butt and driving a car or truck. The poor will become even poorer. It might be time to finally push that baby bird out of the nest and end welfare. If you want to survive and buy things, you MUST EARN IT. Stay in school. Work hard. EARN YOUR LIVING. You might say that we will need new salespeople for all this new technology. Have you been to McDonalds lately? The person behind the counter is so stupid and out of it they can barely sell me a cheeseburger, let alone high-tech gadgets.
You made the assumption in the video that Moore's law will continue which in all likelihood it won't. We're already nearing the limit of what is physically possible with elements of chips being mere atoms thick. There is room for improving efficiency but that's about it. As for quantum computing it looks promising but only for very linear tasks in other words don't expect quantum cpu's any time soon...
Moore's law does not describe the entirety of technological advancement. It's only about silicon semiconductors and goes as far as silicon wafer processes can go. From there we will need a new law describing the optimization of electrical technology.
It's important to note that Moore's law affects hardware only. Software can improve much more significantly and more flexibly, and does not necessarily require better hardware to do so. A lot of "intelligent" apps and programs do NOT need all those 3.4 Ghz in four cores that the phone company advertises. Many AI programs can run on very basic hardware. Also, you could always vertically stack circuit wavers. The tech isn't quite there yet but many companies are pushing for it precisely because of the huge performance improvements it could bring.
Most of the big futurists don't see the ending of Moore's law as the end, they see the start of another form of Moore's Law continuing the exponential growth of technology.
Robots are created. Rich people will invest in robots, selling land from things like agriculture. Smaller land owners will buy more agricultural land from rich people. Robots will take over city jobs. Workers will move to the countryside for work, likely in farming. More and more people with money will invest in robotics and cities. Smaller and smaller land owners will buy land from larger land owners. Countries will be divided by centralised robot urban cities and decentralised human rural towns and villages.
Let's state the reality folks - life evolves to the point where it eventually destroys itself. It's a direction that cannot be stopped, slowed down, or reversed. It likely has happened many time over on this planet. Just like a forest burns itself out and regrows anew, insects and animals go extinct, so are we part of that cycle. I think humans have a while to go yet, but we are aggressively working towards our finality.
I was just thinking right now the fear is AI taking jobs so we cannot earn to live we will be jobless. My idea was could there be another scenario let's say robots do everything that we are taxed for and that we are charged for. Agriculture, public services, manufacture and defence as well as housing and energy production. Would it not be possible for us not to work unless we want to. I mean we would not need to spend money as machines could replenish resources, ship goods and secure energy needs and recycling, replant vegetables and crops.
Let them have all the jobs, let technology replace the human work force and take away the people who try to make money by others suffering and BAM suddenly we can ALL live in a world where everything is free for everyone alive and we will still have access to same things as today + more. idk why everyone is so scared of NOT being forced to work for some asshole just to be able to survive.
Jeremiah Peterson yes i know how the world works right now, my comment was what i personally think people should work for. Which also be easy as fuck to accomplish if people for example realized that 100.000 argy organized people cannot be ruled by 1 person. But if everyone keeps accepting and living in this shit and only once in a while make a personal complaint, the world wont get anywhere
Jeremiah Peterson yeah, hopefully enough people will loose their patience with this shitty system we live in. Otherwise im pretty sure that these bankers/elites in charge will be taken down by AI, because i believe the only people who need to fear AI turning on them are the people who make money by harming others.
People have to work for income to live and buy things. The economy will not work otherwise. Technology can only be allowed to do so much before the economy collapse. Computers and robots don't buy things. Governments run off taxes. No taxes for them either. That ought to implement some mandates and changes to those entrepreneurs that want no payrolls.
If you replace jobs for people then it mean no income people. When people have no income, they are unable to buy. When people are unable to buy who will the robots build stuff for?
You will have Super barons, like Mark Zuckenberg, Larry page ,Sergei Brin, Elon Musk,kuzweil, Bill Gates, Obama, François Hollande, Georges Bush,Netanyahu , just to name a few, who will be the overlords of the world.
They will either starve, genocide or use the other billions of people as slaves, sex laves in case of the women.
Imagine you have Robots working for you, they system and the police are paid by you, you can do anything. Will they choose evil or Good? Elon musk got ten children on his own but he advise the rest of the population to restring at having children .
Larry Page is designing his children to be genetically perfect and he is also working on his longevity, tweaking his DNA editing in other to reach 200 years.
All those future clans will want their progénitures to multiply and take up the lands of undesirable, defective humans like us.
Only engeneers, like them, will survive
Errrr... ever watched Divergent? (& possibly every other movie in that genre) that's where the world is going. Maybe not the crazy destruction... but definitely 'factions' ultimately it wont be about money anymore.
+Alberto Humova and you will be a pawn to these horrible people....
@alberto you need weed in your life bro.....
+jaime almonte I forgive you, for you are judging me because you can't t undrstand me and you are limited by a so poor experience life experience .
Forthough, anticipation, analytic from the past and present doesn't need weed for mind clarity, I just need coffe and a good sleep .
I didn't mean that those events would certainly happened, but since I do know that history is a perpetual wheel who redo itself perpetually , It's easy then to feagure the consequences of a powegrab by a minority.
The powerful CEO, billionaires it today remind me of the divers warlords that shares the italium territory during the Ancient Roman era.
Can you think of how any of us will save for retirement when we have to constantly stop our lives shell out 20 grand to learn new skills because our old skills were made obsolete. The future of work is going to be horrible.
This video assumes most people will be able to struggle and not get "left behind." The reality is that vast numbers of people are and will be "left behind," so society is going to have to deal with that. This new automation doesn't create anywhere near as many jobs as it takes over. Is it the growing welfare state that has put the US $20 trillion in debt?
Why do you think that you need to spend 20 grand to learn a new skill?
These vast numbers of people might not accept their faith just as the French didn't in 1789 and as the Russians didn't in 1917, a dangerous path this is.
General ignorance is the problem.
If machines are capable of doing the work why in the world would we have to hang on the old Concepts like Monetary Exchange?
It's automated an autonomous technology is capable of doing the work and are capable of producing an abundance there's no reason to have Monetary Exchange.
Without Monetary Exchange we can simply solve problems and offer goods and services without a price tag.
@MrHoppers002
Please tell me you don't seriously believe this horse crap?
We millennials we Generation Z are the next ones to take on this world why would we do that to each other when there is a clear solution.
We have live so long with money that some people are not capable of seeing past such a concept but you forget that it was simply a tool and tools can become outdated Obsolete and be replaced by better systems.
Look up a resource-based economy and that's what we're going to do if machines are doing the work there is no longer than need to hold on to the concept of money this is not a pipe dream or science fiction this is clearly reality.
There's no need for any man woman or child after fight or struggle to get the needs of life and there is plenty enough to have access to any good or service you could ever want.
I am not worried about robots replacing human labor, what I am worried about is how humans deal with this change. Ownership and wealth is different from productivity and resources. High productivity lead by robots will allow humans to have a higher standard of living. People from less developed countries could have a quantum leap in living standard. Now, the important part is how the government and private industry could work together to guide the public through this transition from a labor intensive society to a post labor society. Once people no longer need to work 40 hours a week, what should they do with all the free time. As a result, what types of industries would grow to fulfil the extra leisure time.
Calvin Wong so we’re gonna get fat i.e. wall-e?
No extra jobs or work hours. Just more free time to explore, discover, and invent new techniques and technologies and spend time with friends and family.
How are people gonna afford to do anything if they don’t have a job?
The rich will probably create a communist society or a bunch of us will have to die. Lest there be revolution due to the loss of jobs to AI and tech
@@couragecrusader7649 They want us to go the way of the horse. We're nothing but serfs.
Start growing your own food and become self sustainable! And get a technical job where robots cant replace you, well atleast replace you for the next 100 yrs!
Technology is too volatile and changig at too fast of a pace for you to be able to predict a job where you can't be replaced in 100 years... I don't think, from now on, there will be a irreplaceable job that stays irreplaceable for that long...
Learning how to learn fast and adapt yourself to getting as much out of your current job is key. I work in technology and I came in with the understanding that my job will probably not survive the decade and I'll probably need to learn the role that is up and coming.
20 years. Not 100. Tech progress increases very rapidly the further down the timeline we go.
How about animation or game design? Art? WaLkInG!?!?!
no industry is safe. I work as a 3d animator, and while it is more future proof than a driving or manufacturing job what is to say that a more advanced ai cant make faster more consistent decisions always on show style. not only that it could animate hundreds of thousands of frames per day for the cost of the electricity to run
its still way to early now but eventually even creative professional jobs can be automated
There is no evidence that sufficient new jobs will be created, to replace those jobs lost by automation.
Introduce, Universal Basic Income
fungussa PLS don't
Even if sufficient new jobs were to be created, they'd be tech jobs, requiring degrees or high-end skills. The poor and the stupid will just become poorer. South Korea is testing out a new robot that'll deliver a pizza instead of a person. Say goodbye to delivery jobs.
Maybe, society will no longer be on money.....
@@mikewashington4188 What would compensation be without money, whether digital, paper, or a physical commodity?
True .. I think we all will be living on charity from the richest people (who will keep on becoming richer and richer).
Can't get my job taken by a machine if I am a machine.
I mean...your not wrong
Common sense ;)
Top of the line and never breaks down. Sorry pal, unless you upgrade yourself, you get replaced by newer and better.
bionics.
Computers make daily life so much easier. ?
if that is the case, make robots illegal and any technology that is threat to human labor illegal
It's time for me to go coffin shopping. Robots will kill us all.
Mavericks i too could go for Sum Coffin shoppin rn
Damn it’s that real now huh!
Call it sales of the crypt
@Christine LaBeach you’ll have to rent the coffin aswell
@@godisgreat418I bought the robot company miso robotics 3kthousand into its estimated to be worth 3.5 billion every year I could be looking at millions every year 😂
What worries me is that the increased productivity would lead to unprecedented wealth for the already rich while depriving millions of a chance at decent living. Society in India is not conducive to involve equality....
Meanwhile, we continue to 'herd' innocent young people into massive debt for a piece of paper that may not mean a thing for their future.
Pretty much. College are projected to close and merger in the next 10 years.
The solution is creating decentralized, self sufficient, government and big corporation independent communities with their own local food production (permaculture, synthropic farming, food forests, agroforestry, electorculture, biodynamic farming etc), healing systems, cash money (not issued for interest which creates perpetual debt).
If people live this way, the big entities (governments, banks, mega corporations, organized religions etc) which control our world today, loose their workers, customers and become obsolete.
For this to work, you have to start thinking, acting. A large portion of humanity is not willing to do this yet, because they want comfort, even at the cost of self destruction. When the oppression of the globalist cabal becomes more and more unbearable, this might change.
Great video both visually and good information. Straight to the point and no sugar-coating or BS to help people "remain calm". Job reports are bogus, weekly average earnings keep going down, and as many millennials live with their parents since the 1960's. Nothing is safe anymore not even accounting. Thanks baby boomers. On a more positive side, thanks for taking the time to read this (if you did).
let's follow this to it's natural conclusion: less people working means less tax revenue and more people taking government assistance. So the government, in response to the changing landscape of employment and the needs of people, will raise corporate taxes order to redistribute wealth back amoung the people since the corporations are no longer paying the people directly through wages. The unemployed, meanwhile, will not be burdened with a menial job 50 hours per week, and can thus spend time with their children and spouse and explore their hobbies for personal fulfillment. Henceforth a utopia is born and society rejoices at their new found freedom from the shackles of corporate America.
The reality is the fact that more "middle class" will be pushed into poverty and corporations simply outsources the jobs and profit overseas to dodge healthcare and taxes obligations. Nations will bankrupt themselves by over printing and over borrowing money. Weaken finance and job securities will lead to xenophobia and favor even more cuts on social benefits and government healthcare spending. Eventually, governments across the globe will lose power over these multi national & multi industries companies, taxing them even less and deregulation will be the theme of the future. The "modernization" system is heading for total disaster.
Where are the corporations going to get more money from if nobody has jobs? They'll be destroyed as well, its in their best interest for UBI to be a thing.
More likely that the army becomes made up of drones and AI. When the elites realize you are not contributing to their wealth , they have no need for you and send you to a special camp by force.
Anti corporation's with no customers will have no money or power. jobless customers can't buy anything.
Tnb Spotter dead customers can't buy anything.
Who will buy the companies products then?
I work at a warehouse my job has just gotten these new automated walkie riders which drives itself to the location it’s needs to go too. Now although no one has gotten fired yet but we notice a huge change in hiring. We used to get a new hire almost every Monday for the last four months since we got these walkie riders we haven’t gotten a new person. We know why but it just sad to see that one simple machine took away jobs from people who are out there looking for a way to get paid.
U still working there or did they let go?
What’s the probability of YOUR job being replaced by a robot?
---> ua-cam.com/video/_OV1z1MJ9dA/v-deo.html
We want to help you stay informed with our bite sized data!
I wouldn’t want an ai doctor
Actually looks like a decent channel!
I don’t understand how they calculated some of these
This is pretty wild but I don’t trust machines
How do these companies expect customers to buy their technologically innovative products if no one has money to spend because their job has been automated?
More than 40% of the American population makes less than $15/hr. I suppose the powers that be expect those people who are replaced by technology to find a way to survive on their own.
So in essence, technology is about replacing people.
Yes.So that the rich can become richer.
Yep... to "Make our lives easier"
3:00 they may be able to understand language, recognize faces, and compose music, but they don't understand what it means. To a machine a language is just words that don't convey a meaning, faces are gust images that don't do anything, and music is just sound.
Are they using Dre Johnson from 'Black-ish' to narrate this? 😂
Definately
I knowww as soon as I heard that voice I was certain it was him
I'm a drafter. I trained in 2D drafting and a little bit of 3D modeling. But BIM, at some point will take a lot of jobs away for drafters. It just makes it a lot easier for engineers to get the design work done without giving it to someone else. I'm not too happy about this seeing that I started my pro drafting career 1.5 years ago. An engineering degree really isn't to my liking. Hopefully in the near future I can get a architectural degree and not have to worry so much about my present career path being taken away from me.
Eventually, all jobs will be automated.
@Michael Taylor according to who? Name me a time in history where every job was automated ? I’ll wait
I'm so ready obsolete money already
So how are you going to obtain a loaf of bread?
Have you ever heard of the Venus Project? The founder Jaque fresco worked his whole life 80+ years on designing a world without money. Where machines can take care 90%+ jobs (back in the 50s so you take a guess where were at now). I'd recommend looking them up! You will not be dissapointed.
@mateas786 Your analysis was good at first but devolved into factually wrong science-fictional rambles.
While these developments can lower production costs and improve efficiency, the savings can be utilized to expand operations and to re-skill and redeploy workers.
Interesting subject! Using this video for an ESL class today.
How horrible is our economic system that robots taking everyone’s jobs is a bad thing?
robot maintenance can be automated by building maintenance robots to service the rest...
new robot design is done by artificial intelligence... not humans
no human is needed at any point... they can never compete with the machine
@@ethangray8527 i guess so, but as soon as you start to include biological components in a system, you have slowed it down dramatically, and added a lot of vulnerability
Yeah I think machines are supposed to be made for work with human not for complete replacement (like pilots still have their jobs while computer is doing the routine job). Or we're gonna face lots of problems, cause if machines start replace people for providing goods, people will start saving their money and start spend less money on things they don't need to survive. So idk if we're ready for that. I mean let's say you can find another job right, and most of the jobs will be connected to computers and programming, but what if there are people who are not interested in making money, but have a genuine interest in their profession (like doctors or pilots) what if career is more important for them.
that is 100% true but also this paragraph im about to wright tell you why we even though we will lose alot of jobs we will gain alot more
Somehow we are increasing the amount of human labor even though we are trying to decrease the amount of human labor ie. banks etc. Machines really depend on us to keep them working and for them to be used by customers and employers etc. and also the machines increase the importance of our work, judgement and creativity. Technology is removing the middle class jobs but drastically increasing lower and higher class jobs. We now have smarter students for jobs because we need to stay in school until we are 16 at least but recommended 18 instead of 14.
Detroit: Become Human: Black and White animation DLC
The threat to medical practitioners is highly oversold here. Making those jobs easier may mean that demand for those jobs won't grow as fast, we're a long way from not needing an radiology tech assistant or whatever and radiologist.
I assume lots of driving jobs will go away, some to be replaced with security guard, often armed, for instance moving along with a set of trucks.
technology has reached its peak in 1990s now its advancing faster than ever and now its used to cut cost to companies and to compromise cost and quality technology has so much advanced because of human expansion and the governments allow something to happen that they shouldn't allow just to get money in the form of license and tax, technology makes jobs unstable and stress full, it takes you further and further away from a natural life, it can help you as long as you are young or rich......
And how will companies make money if people have no money to buy their shit? and if money wouldn't be a thing anymore the lifestyle that would exist with our dependence on robots sounds decadent, even without them society is already decadent.
We need a basic income.
Jeremiah, half the world's population are morons. Why would you expect a society of intellects?
Yep
Yep
Universal Basic Income
Vote for Andrew Yang and you will receive that
The problem is simple. The very concept of jobs & the need to have a job is becoming obsolete.
Automation means less work for humans to do. Yet, the economic model still demands high employment rates.
The concept of jobs is fast becoming obsolete. The need to have people work for money is fast becoming obsolete. Putting the economy before people & the planet is patently wrong.
It's evolution baby. Pearl Jam has always been right
It's not evolution. It is deliberate (& deliberatly hidden)
Yet the answer is so simple.
Technology creates more jobs than it kills.
Technology kills traditional jobs but creates new jobs via new entrepreneurship opportunities.
Whilst it's true many jobs have been replaced by tech/automation many more jobs via entrepreneurship opportunities have been unlocked by the same technology.
Examples:
New set of entrepreneurship (mobile phones & money, talktime dealership etc that never existed 30 years ago)
people making fortunes thro blogging, youtubing etc
Millions of tech jobs in the IT industries:
Web developer. ...
Apple genius. ...
SEO consultant. ...
App Developer. ...
UX designer. ...
Cloud services specialist. ...
Software engineer
technicians
Social media manager. There was no need for these professionals until social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram became mainstream. ...
Digital marketer. ...
Wind energy engineer. ...
Drone pilot. ...
App developer
control room monitors
Manual labor will always be needed. It won't pay as as good as a technician though probably.
am i the only one whos hearing Anthony Anderson voice
No, me too
If technology was good enough everything would be free because the only real important jobs would be maintaining technology and making sure it’s doing what it’s suppose to. Because if technology was large enough r would be able to automatically pick up garbage, package food, make food after automatically planting crops and automatically watering them, feeding people, automatically making a massage bed to automatically massage you, etc. Basically jobs wouldn’t be necessary because we’d be able to still meet all our basic needs.
Although we’d still be able to be creative and share ideas with each other . I would hope an industrial revolution happens so everything is free and we can be more like a community and share ideas
It’s okay. Great things come with every revolution.
As a business owner for a small car wash my goal is to buy a full automation car wash and grow it from there
Humans 200 years from now “I wonder what was it like before UBI, when everyone had to work”
This is the thing: AI do not have a need for money. If enough people get skilled to program AI, the computers will be cheaper. But only people need money. So I see goods becoming cheaper and real stuff thats requires a human touch emerging and become bigger. So a shift in how it happens. Money was created to create a system between people, not machines...
Buying organic is going to have a whole new meaning in the next coming years.
Edit: organic = buying human made products
That'll be one small niche. Personally, I'd rather buy from a bot.
what about products made "of" humans.. hehehehe
All of you talking about how this will make poor people poorer... Have you ever thought that the economy will also change in reflection of this? Stop being so fearful of change, get ready to adapt. All the people I read here that are complaining are just scared of not being good enough.
My contention what does worrying effectively do besides inaction? Worry less, do more and achieve results. Stop whining cuz whining creates 0 value.
Dude, you're being overly dramatic with no need to be. You have the internet which is amazing information and you don't need a university degree to learn things. You can do so many free courses, you can read stuff. You don't have to have information spoon fed. That's the problem, people think you only learn in school and disregard the fact that learning is a synonym for life. If you're willing to always grow and learn then you'll soon see that all of your rant is just that... A rant.
That's fine, but you realize for that "scholarly source", you are going to pay one hell of a hefty premium. Average colleges are at least 30k tuition, many reputable and better programs cost a couple hundred to a couple thousand for the entire experience (bootcamps, self teaching through online courses).
In the majority of cases the alternative has actually been MUCH more effective at preparing people vocationally. The advantage of the college degree is that it buys you more credibility with employers, but this is for the most artificial of reasons. Having a prestigious degree DOES NOT equal capability , a degree is just an easy marker to gauge on for an employer, not a reliable one.
I personally would rather pay for the cheaper alternative that teaches me all the foundations to develop a practical skill so I can create my own credability. Colleges also have a tendency of making you learn how to do stuff with really outdated tools....
There will always be shortsighted dummies around, that's just the way it is. Industrialist morons who are too stubborn to realize all the benefits of automated hard labor. They rather put poor people there so that they can have their backs broken at the age of 30 and die at 50. Utter morons. The economy will absolutely change from this. People can still become Doctors, therapists and what not. Computers by todays means will never outperform a human being, a computer is purely logical, a human is so much more which means that you still need people to take decisions. While you might not need doctors to perform surgery or analyze a patient, you still need them for other things. A utopia also requires everyone to want everything well for everyone else, and that is very far from what the world looks like, nor will be able to form for a long time, that would require you to disassemble all the current political systems, capitalism and so on, that's not gonna happen.The more work that is being over taken by robotics, the less people have to work in general. This will neither be centralized like many seem to piss their pants about, anyone with enough brain capacity will be able to produce software and hardware architectures needed for this, it should in theory also make the general population smarter which apparently is very much needed. There will also be poor people in this either way, but the difference is that the rich will not be low IQ unskilled people like many are today. The smarter you are, the higher you will rise, and that would give the dummies a chance to start using their brains more. Now, developing computers and such requires a lot more than just knowledge, it also requires a lot of intelligence (which doesn't always go hand in hand), and intelligence is a lot harder to learn, so they wont stand equal to the ones who are naturally more intelligent. Today more knowledge and intelligence does not mean more money at all, that part is more about greed than anything. It's not difficult to find a way to make huge sums of money, but a lot of people have higher moral standards than what that requires, and the ones who don't are mostly the elites. Think about this for a second, this example is taken from something I thought of a lot lately. A network technician for example doesn't need 5% of the knowledge of a low level software engineer, and yet in many cases the network technician makes a lot more money. People are getting terribly ripped off, and they don't have a single clue about it.
Technology want everybody to be engineer one day. But practically its not possible. It seems like only engineer & scientist jobs will be available in future. You are over optimistic. Take of your pink googles so that you can see the reality.
Only a politician can change the world technology by mean of a useful philosophy in factor.
You think that 50 % of the jobs that will disappear in 2030 are done by 50 % of the active population ? More like 90 % of the workers are in the 50 % jobs that will disappear, the rest being more qualified and creative works. Maybe the 10 % jobs that will disappear in 2020 are done by 40 % of the population.
One answer is found in a profession that many find intimidating even though this profession gives the average person the best opportunity to succeed in creating time/financial freedom. Network Marketing.
Technology holds people back from being successful in life too. Nobody wants to talk about it
AI will not replace jobs, but rather upgrade them, making them more efficient and as a result creating new jobs and methods for completing the same job.
These new jobs where AI will then be a part of will require new training.
However, I must add that our privacy will be almosy nil...but no one will focus on that. We will be too much in aww of the never experienced tech.
Everything will be smart, and will have be constantly collecting data in order to do its job effectively...like this smart phone that I'm typing with, that constantly listens to everything that is said around it.
Cool story what new jobs?
Work as a mechanic plumber electrician hvac robots will not be taking these jobs
Not yet, anyway. Fully functioning androids are probably only a few decades away.
@@mjt1517 Im sceptical about that. There's a lot of hype regarding AI much of it is BS.
James Roscoe your skepticism will melt away as the tech develops.
@@mjt1517 I work in transportation and there are companies already working on autonomous vehicles, so I'm concerned and I'm in my early 30s. That's why I'm planning on learning a new skill which can lead to running my own business.
How to create these animations...I want to use this technique in my presentation....
Such a shame. People spend a lot of time and “money” in college and when they get out, the career is replaced with AI.
Technology has always been replacing jobs… with different jobs. It’s been happening since the industrial revolution and is nothing new. Old jobs become obsolete and replaced by new jobs. Jobs in the horse and buggy industry were replaced by jobs in the automobile industry… and so forth.
Good. In a distance future, there won't be a need to work, machines will do all the work and people can pursuit activities that give them pleasure.
How they supposed to do that with no job and money?
slappy, that might work for awhile, then that person gets their ass thrown out.
I dont need robots, i prefer to do it myself, fuck robots. Traditional things are better than a fake emotionless robot that isn't human.
Taxing robots? That will just hold back the technology for a while until someone works out an AI that can run the entire economy through a system of keystroke spending and debt jubilee to give consumer incomes. Might be a good idea to discuss the pros and cons as foreseen.
Automation Tax is the answer if Company's want too kill jobs with automation they can pay more Tax. Very simple and very fair if a machine takes away a Tax Payer then the Machine can pay the Tax. Sadly this wont happen and what will happen is Billions will be lost in Tax Revenue because their will be less workers therefore less Tax Payers. Billions more will have too be payed in Welfare costs. The only winners will the the Owners of the Companys and the CEOs will be get Huge Bonuses.
Companies and corporations want automation to increase their greed, but in the end it will be to their.own demise. Millions less human customers who cannot afford the products.
some robot gonna pay my taxes bring it on man
That’s so truth, each individual will have more experience on all different type of jobs in their life compare to your parents generation
Anthony Anderson narrating is 👌🏾
There is already a shift in employment. Money cash payment is getting less more electronic payments r coming about. I am all for this as a new world is being born and that is great. More time with family more tax for the corporations that pay for the down side of this. More training for the new kids around and more efficacy is born. People have too adjust and work together more as we have and should of been. This will stop greed too a point. I am a taxi driver a veteran as well. Driverless cars and more time with the family..
This vid gave me a slight panic attack XD but it opened my eyes to see whats actually happening in the world .
We Evolve And Progress Everytime
Here's the thing though,
If all companies become fully automated, then there will be no more employment.
If there is no more employment, people will have no money.
If no-one will have money, who's going to buy the products these automated companies are producing??
If there's no-one to buy their products, what do you think will happen to these companies?? Sales👎
Now, do these companies still think going fully automated will benefit them on the long run??
The robots will become unemployed.
Also, think about it, if you don't have employees, and people in general don't have jobs, then we don't have money, and well, no customers. What's the point in production if you have no customer? People will always have some kind of jobs. Even those who make bronze tools today have their customers. Some people are interested in bronze knives and kitchen utensils. It seems like a lot of people don't know what automatization and AI is capable of, because people are usually afraid of what they don't understand
there will be the wealthy elite class who own the AI and robots, and they will be each others customers buying each others robots and services and power... but the average person will have nothing to spend on products and no work
Work force is done now they can sell there products to robots
Why would " intelligent"the robots do all the work when there would be an abundance of idle humans to do it for them? Rise of the machines........
Not all mechanical systems will have full autonomy. A burger flipping robot will just be a machine built for flipping burgers. It would make no sense for it to have self awareness or a broad scope of intelligence.
Oh wow, it's true. We will have to be constantly learning new skills to stay employable and survive. We are already doing it.
Especially older people, but I just didn't realize that it's already happening.
This is great news more jobs building robots
Put people out of work and who is going to buy the products? People lose their homes which increases dependency on social programs. But without taxes coming in from those out of work, it just gets worse. Who will pay to help those people transition to a new job?
I have already seen the impacts of AI and technology. I havent stop any banking for last 6 months(just online banking). That means I allowed atleast 1 employee to lose his/her job. In retail I like self check out, it means managers to reduce labour cost and increase automation. 15% of shopping I do it online. I think if you are like me, we are helping few people to be rich(minimzing through auto) and millions people(including mom,dad..) are losing their jobs. From tommorow I will take actions and I have to change my online behaviour. Did i mention, I am losing many friends because I use internet alot? Yes, I cant remember when I had a good time with my best friends. It sad.
Omar you can't hold back progress, the future is coming no matter what... human jobs will start to dry up.
if you ran a store that had humans working there, your prices would have to be much higher to pay them all...
but the store down the street is all automatic, self service and the prices are far cheaper...
you can just decide to stick with the old system
Add eye glass lens grinder and cutter. Currently, this requires minimal vocational training and certification, not university work. So, bye skilled workers.
The trend is clear now for decade's. Eventually automation will replace all labor and middle management.
Not investment advice
Maybe if you do have a few extra dollars (even just $20/month), put it into different companies that will benefit from this. At least you're somewhat hedged against automation.
Not investment advice
Even today, we have millions of people who can't even finish high school then want welfare checks for the rest of their lives. You honestly think people are going to learn new skills constantly as you say at (5:10)? The big problem with the future is we are killing no-skill jobs for high-skill jobs. Sure, driverless cars create jobs, but not the same job as simply sitting on your butt and driving a car or truck. The poor will become even poorer. It might be time to finally push that baby bird out of the nest and end welfare. If you want to survive and buy things, you MUST EARN IT. Stay in school. Work hard. EARN YOUR LIVING. You might say that we will need new salespeople for all this new technology. Have you been to McDonalds lately? The person behind the counter is so stupid and out of it they can barely sell me a cheeseburger, let alone high-tech gadgets.
Great judge dredd warned us about this
Highly recommended!!
So how can we work or can we earn a monthly income but how ???
If robots will replace humans then how will they live
All it would take is one good EMP (the sun emitting a burst of energy, for example.) To send us back into the dark ages.
The problem is I cannot predict when an EMP is about to happen
*we
You made the assumption in the video that Moore's law will continue which in all likelihood it won't. We're already nearing the limit of what is physically possible with elements of chips being mere atoms thick. There is room for improving efficiency but that's about it. As for quantum computing it looks promising but only for very linear tasks in other words don't expect quantum cpu's any time soon...
there are ways futurism.com/for-first-time-ever-carbon-nanotube-transistors-have-outperformed-silicon/
Moore's law does not describe the entirety of technological advancement. It's only about silicon semiconductors and goes as far as silicon wafer processes can go. From there we will need a new law describing the optimization of electrical technology.
It's important to note that Moore's law affects hardware only. Software can improve much more significantly and more flexibly, and does not necessarily require better hardware to do so. A lot of "intelligent" apps and programs do NOT need all those 3.4 Ghz in four cores that the phone company advertises. Many AI programs can run on very basic hardware.
Also, you could always vertically stack circuit wavers. The tech isn't quite there yet but many companies are pushing for it precisely because of the huge performance improvements it could bring.
Most of the big futurists don't see the ending of Moore's law as the end, they see the start of another form of Moore's Law continuing the exponential growth of technology.
Robots are created. Rich people will invest in robots, selling land from things like agriculture. Smaller land owners will buy more agricultural land from rich people. Robots will take over city jobs. Workers will move to the countryside for work, likely in farming. More and more people with money will invest in robotics and cities. Smaller and smaller land owners will buy land from larger land owners. Countries will be divided by centralised robot urban cities and decentralised human rural towns and villages.
Not to worry fellas..the more technology develops the more prospects of jobs comes into market..only the situations have changed...
Did they just move factories to Canada? Where regulations are more lax
Answer: Yea, I'm ready. I've been ready for awhile now.
Tech won't replace jobs if we don't make that way.
Evrerything has been changing by technology
A few years later the entire world Will change completely the way we see It
The trades (i.e. Carpentry, electricians, infrastructure worker, plumber and maybe mechanics for robots) seem pretty safe.
Let's state the reality folks - life evolves to the point where it eventually destroys itself. It's a direction that cannot be stopped, slowed down, or reversed. It likely has happened many time over on this planet. Just like a forest burns itself out and regrows anew, insects and animals go extinct, so are we part of that cycle. I think humans have a while to go yet, but we are aggressively working towards our finality.
I was just thinking right now the fear is AI taking jobs so we cannot earn to live we will be jobless. My idea was could there be another scenario let's say robots do everything that we are taxed for and that we are charged for. Agriculture, public services, manufacture and defence as well as housing and energy production. Would it not be possible for us not to work unless we want to. I mean we would not need to spend money as machines could replenish resources, ship goods and secure energy needs and recycling, replant vegetables and crops.
if it gets me faster internet..
Friar Jean 5G is coming soon
Let them have all the jobs, let technology replace the human work force and take away the people who try to make money by others suffering and BAM suddenly we can ALL live in a world where everything is free for everyone alive and we will still have access to same things as today + more. idk why everyone is so scared of NOT being forced to work for some asshole just to be able to survive.
Jeremiah Peterson yes i know how the world works right now, my comment was what i personally think people should work for.
Which also be easy as fuck to accomplish if people for example realized that 100.000 argy organized people cannot be ruled by 1 person. But if everyone keeps accepting and living in this shit and only once in a while make a personal complaint, the world wont get anywhere
Jeremiah Peterson yeah, hopefully enough people will loose their patience with this shitty system we live in.
Otherwise im pretty sure that these bankers/elites in charge will be taken down by AI, because i believe the only people who need to fear AI turning on them are the people who make money by harming others.
socialist propaganda
Those robots will probably break down a bunch and then the companies will realize it's cheaper to hire people than to repair these machines.
boldsign...
Uh...No....machines will be repairing machines....humans will are not technical and precise enough to fix those advances technologies....
Cars break down but you don't see horses pulling carriages again.
You don’t think they’ll find ways to deal with malfunctioning machines?...
MostEnigmatic
More machines.....machines will be repairing machines that repair machines....
Ghana Mafia ya... No people will be repairing them
People have to work for income to live and buy things. The economy will not work otherwise. Technology can only be allowed to do so much before the economy collapse. Computers and robots don't buy things. Governments run off taxes. No taxes for them either. That ought to implement some mandates and changes to those entrepreneurs that want no payrolls.
If there is no income whom u sell ur stuff?
Presidential candidate Andrew yang has been speaking on this. #YANGGANG
Oh fuck. How do we stop this?
The average person will be impoverished. The owners of the automation will not hand out their products and services for free.
Time to change
I will be on disability money
Im out of the rat race
When you realize that computing power can’t increase that much because of quantum tunneling
Very nice video
We the people gonna have to get payed to work the machine and also if it breaks down