Thanks for sharing. But I just don’t understand why “Tri V” is even a concept. Just some basic combinations that can occur depending on situation. Nothing new that is not already in the doce methodos. I just don’t see the value in this as a separate concept.
Tri-V is more than just basic combinations, it is a conceptual approach to the system. The basic combinations shown here are literally the baby steps as you enter the system. I can't explain it here but watch this interview and see if it helps. (and everything in Tri-V is contained in Doce Methodos, but again more conceptual.) ua-cam.com/video/jP1DsYGIrE4/v-deo.htmlsi=5CqndDGfV6fbO-GD&t=848
@@BlackbirdTrainingGroup Thanks for the link. Perhaps i am still missing something to me I learn all the three components mentioned as part of the application of the doce methodos. You cannot apply anything without footwork, bridging, and weapon manipulation. I don’t know the history as to why Tri V is even a separate concept.
@@gegaoli Sorry, I didn't get back to you. Again, think conceptual approach to the same material, a reformulation of the curriculum. This is really a question to GT as he was the guy who decided the change was important. It is important to note that even the senior practitioners can't agree on what the "12 Methods" are, so there are some fundamental issues of curriculum even defining what Doce Methodos entails.
Tri-V was designed for military to train quickly as they dont have time to learn the classical forms of pekiti tirsia. With Tri-V they can leave a seminar with something that is useful on the battlefield
@@YOURMATD Thank you. So back to my original point…it seems more like a condensed subset of material from the source (doce methodos) presented for that audience to take away some core skills.
Very nicely explained ❤
Keep it up!❤❤❤
As always thankyou for sharing and inspiring us all to train hard and smart, one love from England
👍👍
👍👍👍👍👍
Thanks for sharing. But I just don’t understand why “Tri V” is even a concept. Just some basic combinations that can occur depending on situation. Nothing new that is not already in the doce methodos. I just don’t see the value in this as a separate concept.
Tri-V is more than just basic combinations, it is a conceptual approach to the system. The basic combinations shown here are literally the baby steps as you enter the system. I can't explain it here but watch this interview and see if it helps. (and everything in Tri-V is contained in Doce Methodos, but again more conceptual.) ua-cam.com/video/jP1DsYGIrE4/v-deo.htmlsi=5CqndDGfV6fbO-GD&t=848
@@BlackbirdTrainingGroup Thanks for the link. Perhaps i am still missing something to me I learn all the three components mentioned as part of the application of the doce methodos. You cannot apply anything without footwork, bridging, and weapon manipulation. I don’t know the history as to why Tri V is even a separate concept.
@@gegaoli Sorry, I didn't get back to you. Again, think conceptual approach to the same material, a reformulation of the curriculum. This is really a question to GT as he was the guy who decided the change was important. It is important to note that even the senior practitioners can't agree on what the "12 Methods" are, so there are some fundamental issues of curriculum even defining what Doce Methodos entails.
Tri-V was designed for military to train quickly as they dont have time to learn the classical forms of pekiti tirsia. With Tri-V they can leave a seminar with something that is useful on the battlefield
@@YOURMATD Thank you. So back to my original point…it seems more like a condensed subset of material from the source (doce methodos) presented for that audience to take away some core skills.