One of my buddies in high school was a really smart, and studious black guy. Really knew his stuff. But everytime we got our tests back, his were marked low despite getting most of the answers right. Turns out...he had the teachers put a low grade at the top, and his real grade at the bottom real small...because he got tired of being bullied by other black kids for "acting white."
@@Vaillleindeed. The never ending ingenuity of human beings is awesome. See the obstacle, and adapt to get around it. I imagine he did well in life...
OK, I was a white kid in a severely underfunded, isolated rural public school... I'm so envious that the kids in your school got a chance to take a test to go to a better school, and super pissed that they didn't take it seriously! I would have chewed off an arm to have even a 1/100000000 chance to get into a better environment. And now as an adult I have to listen to these same people talk about how privileged I was... they have NO idea.
Your description is more prevalent than the white privilege narrative they keep pushing. My area did well academically but we were always held back because we didn’t have the diversity these elites were looking for to prop. Some in the area have been fortunate to come from good families, but a good handful unfortunately were not. It drove me nuts because the average house medium was way below the state’s exceptions, and we have a history of promising students but this region is severely neglected.
I remember seeing a documentary (probably pbs) about some black kids in a northeast (i think) school. One girl was pretty smart but she said she couldn't get too good grades or study because everyone would get on her case and ask her why she was trying to be white. I didn't even know what to think about this as it was expected of kids in my family to study things and learn things to have options in life. I also did not think studying was only for people with lighter skin color - seems absurd to say it out loud. I thought it was a real shame that her so-called friends were trying to hold her back from success.
It’s called controversial when then study is taken from a controlled group of people. I can only be responsible for myself as a person, not a whole race. Thank god for free will….cause only dead fish go with the flow.
There is data that contradicts his claim. And there is a reason white people will weaponize 911 against black people. They know the police are like their personal bodyguard.
Integrity and honesty is what is missing in America….the country would be a lot better off if people would just tell the truth and just be honest with people. Good or bad just tell the truth.
True. The difference between "blacks" and "whites" is nothing compared to the difference between truth-tellers and liars. Where's the line, anyway? *Political communitarianism is a scourge.* The United States should have understood by now that *there are all shades of human skin* , from the darkest to the lightest, and that *this "black or white" thing is just a really bad joke.* Yet you all still speak of human "races" on this continent, and even more in North America (at least it seems to me). Why is that? Do you really *believe* in races? Religiously maybe? How do you define human races in biology?
What we are talking about here is essentially censorship and corruption within the scientific community... and yes, what the dude is telling us here reminds me of what the court said in Galileo's trials although in Galileo's case the theory wasn't yet good enough while here there don't seem to be any valid scientific objections to it.
Funny but sad. Equally sad and ironic is that there are more professors engaged in covering up the truth rather than seeking it at an institution of higher learning.
It’s the inner city black culture. No fathers in the home. The more kids they have the larger their welfare checks, provided there is no father in home. No school choice. We can’t forget all the abortion clinics located in the black communities. What kind of chances do they have?
I'm a white guy, and I grew up in a small town where there were no black people at all. Not until I was in high school did a black family move to our town. So I had NO EXPERIENCE around black people growing up while white. The only reference I had was my grandfather, who was prejudiced. At age 19 I got a job in a predominantly black and hispanic neighborhood. Several of the other employees were black. What did I think as a white guy?? No. Instead I thought I KNOW I have no experience around black people and I have no idea what to expect. So...the only thing I knew was to think nothing different. It's just more people. After two weeks my black co-workers were calling me "blood." That's when I knew I was not messing up. Treating them like I treat everyone is exactly how it should be. Now.....THIS is what I figured out on my own, yet "they," the people creating the narratives, want you and me to believe I am inherently racist BECAUSE I am white. No, they just want to divide us Americans. Don't let them. Don't let them tell you how things are when you are not seeing it.
1. All brains work basically the same, using pattern recognition to identify and anticipate things. Brains also work by "completing" patchy information. Brains are therefore bound to err, but the beauty is they would not even err otherwise, they'd just be incapable of doing anything. 2. Race (i.e. skin color, basically, notwithstanding its scientific irrelevance), biologically speaking, depends on genetics. People's genetics depend on population genetics. Population genetics depending on sexual intercourse, it depended until recently on geography. (Today it is easier to travel great distances and relocate even to another continent.) Geography determined human geography and therefore culture. So there you have it: until recently, race, as a geographical marker, had cultural and therefore social implications. 3. In other words, whatever your race, when you scan your environment, you immediately identify people as same race or other, among many other things. That's simply visual pattern recognition, and absolutely everybody performs it, save the blind. Whether you are black, white, Native American, oriental, Autronesian, Aboriginal Australian, Melanesian, Martian or Venusian. 4. Whatever your race, as you compute your visual data, you deal with many other sets of information which will allow various types of associations and anticipations, according to your personal and cultural experience (no need to call it a bias at this stage, though it will often incorporate all sorts of biases). For instance, if you live in a continent where most people have always looked (at least until recently) quite distinct from other continents' people, you will automatically assume that such a distinct individual, in your continent, is likely to be a foreigner, speak differently, etc. 5. Thus, whatever your "race", when you come across people from another "race", you register the difference and instantly operate with lots of information, where associations and anticipations kick in. Such associations and anticipations need absolutely not be racist, in terms of negative feelings and readiness to be hostile in any way towards the other, but they can be regarded as racist in a weaker sense, forgivable, of registering facts and instinctively guessing at the situation... based on "race" (among so many other things). 6. It is in this weaker, purely neurophysiological sense, I believe, that we all are "racist". To this "racism" we must add certain things that affect diferently the different "races", which may be detrimental or advantatgeous to people from those other "races". It is obvious that in recent history, white people were privileged more often than not, relative to people from other races when they crossed eachother. Such privilege lingers on, even when we reject it to the extent that it might benefit us. Things evolve and may improve, but it takes time. Privilege is in-built, structural, and often unnoticed, especially by the privileged, sometimes denied, even by the unprivileged. Social, cultural, and psychological inertia is a factor. 7. Political dynamics can sometimes sour and take bad turns, making society regress. There are always bad actors ready to exploit that potential, fueling divisiveness, including "racial" or "immigration" issues. That's when racism isn't anymore in the weak sense and takes its stronger meaning of nasty prejudice and active discrimination. 8. There are numerous ways to suffer from a disadvantage or benefit from an advantage. Some are connected with race, others with social class, or other family characteristics. One can be white and poor, endure abusive parents, lack of opportunities, etc., and yet, simply for being white, still benefit from certain things that, say, a black person may not enjoy, basically for being black. This, which should be obvious, is often denied and exploited by politicians that fuel the very racism they deny. Nonetheless, this is compatible with some people who still suffer racism, today, affording to react and become racist themselves in response. That is an unfortunate and undesirable thing, since all racisms are bad, but in a way, a sign of progress, because said people, in the past, could not afford to become racist or at least express it. When someone can afford to be racist and even be racist without realizing it, that's some level of privilege. Their ancestors could not afford it. It is unfortunate when someone falls into racism, but at least, racism is getting more diversified and democratic so to speak: everybody can now be a racist or a victim of racism in its stronger sense. 9. Some people who were and often still are less privileged than you, not being white (and I am only talking about race-related privilege here, i.e. "white privilege"), can indeed, today, be racist against, or relative to, whites. Many people who maybe suffered more racism, or became more sensitive to it for whatever reasons, might become so-called "woke" activists fanatically, exagerating things, falling into hatred and so-called reverse racism (which obviously exists in spite of some "expert" anti-racists' denial). But, importantly, not all anti-racists and "woke" activists fall into that. Most progressives actually don't, by far. It is an evil political discourse, veering towards fascism, that tries to present all anti-racists, activists, ONGs, leftists/progressives/liberals as anti-white, "woke" (understood as voodoo), "communist" (understood as totalitarian if not satanical), etc.
@@nomcognom2414 - Thank you for laying out why you believe people are racist. My post was simple. I grew up with no black people in my life. At age 19 I had employment with several black employees. I chose to not interact with them in any way different from all the people I interacted with previously. What I was doing was ignoring my grandfather's prejudiced views. I found, other than some slight vocabulary differences, that these black employees were no different from the rest of the fellow Americans I interacted with, and myself. This did not demonstrated any racism. It only demonstrated a new experience, like *any* new experience; not knowing what to expect, and entering into the experience with an open mind.
@@1001Hobbies, racism is a word that has various meanings, like most other words, I guess. Sometimes, especially with words regarding issues that lend themselves to politicization, the existence of different meanings is deliberately ignored or exploited to manipulate people. This, politically, is used for mass deception, indoctrination, and radicalization. I am not a social scientist but I'll give you my opinion that it would have been better to avoid the word "racism" to describe what I called racism in its weaker sense, i.e. guessing at people and/or unconscious white privilege. BTW, I'd like to distinguish between innocently guessing at people (such as "he's brown in Finland, therefore likely a foreigner", or "she's white in Lesotho, therefore likely a foreigner"), when people just make innocent guesses being aware they are just assessing probabilities, on one hand, and, on the other hand, people whose way to "guess" at strangers is "he's brown in Finland, therefore he MUST be ready or seeking to commit a crime, and I will treat him "accordingly", whatever he may say and however he may try to fool me". The second type of "guessing" is pure racism, in its stronger meaning. Another example, of course, would also be "she's white, therefore a neocolonialist" (in Lesotho, Israel, or wherever)", or "she's white, therefore a racist" (in Lesotho and wherever)". Since people do increasingly use "racism" in that first weaker sense, I am obliged to agree that, to that extent, we are all "racists". But then, we should be cautious to prevent people becoming convinced or even convincing us that racism is everywhere and that we all are, especially those racially privileged, badly or damagingly racist, in a stronger sense. Racism has at least two different meanings for me, and I will disagree with any discourse that mixtures them into a single meaning of bad racism which would simply exist along some gradient, going from unwitting and mild to deliberate and superevil. Other than in that first meaning of the word, I don't think you and I can be said to be "racists", and I won't let people go unanswered if they try to imply that I am a racist and I should feel bad about it. Which doesn't mean that you or I could never perpetrate some microracism without even realizing it. I think all human beings are susceptible of occasional microracism, like making a very poor guess and upsetting somebody, based on "race". Same goes for ethnicity, "social class", religion, sex, sexual orientation, etc. We can just be wrong, sometimes, in some ugly way. Also, traditional or widespread prejudice may sometimes be a cultural reality still affecting us, or contaminating us, residually or occasionally, in spite of our egalitarian ideas and care to avoid prejudice. If we become aware or are proven that in some case, we should just be humbled and learn the lesson. Such mistakes, when smaller and rare, don't define us. The smaller and the rarer, and the more they embarrass us, the more we should be appreciated as non racists. Some will interpret this as a naive avowal of racism, "maybe lighter but still racism", but it isn't. They will be mixing different different things by construing phenomenon A (1st meaning of racism) as phenomenon B (2nd and worse meaning of racism), only towards its milder side of the spectrum. Nope, we are not on that spectrum. I might some day embarrass myself, but that embarrassment would be precisely why I shouldn't feel shame to be how I am. If it ever happens to you, it will be proof of your not being a "racist", precisely.
@@nomcognom2414 - OK, you go ahead and always process what to think about someone based on their color and your automatic preconceived notions about what they are like because of their color....and I will just continue to form my opinions and views on someone based on my interaction with that particular individual, no matter their race.
What's a black professor? Is Neil DeGrasse Tyson a black Astrophysicist? What about Barrack Obama was he in the office of black president. The US needs to stop prefacing everything with a colour. That would be a start.
It is what it is. Black people are referred to as black. Also, him being black is relevant as he is proving their is an anti-white bias. A white professor tries that, and may be called racist. A black professor on the other hand will be taken more seriously, then a white professor. That is why his race is mentioned.
He didn't accidentally do anything. He found an unexpected result and told the truth about it after doing his due diligence. Absolute epitome of a Professor using his science, putting his own feelings aside to tell the truth. A great man.
So basically, he said that researchers are willing to suppress unbiased results. Just let that sink in and think about the implications of that. This is the state of "the science" we heard about non-stop for the last few years.
And then we are constantly told: "There are no studies that show.........(insert inconvenient truth)" Now you know why I don't trust the media anymore.
Go to a research university, and you can easily lose a lot of your romantic ideas about science being a dispassionate search for truth. Best case scenario you’re in the hard sciences where the main bias is the pressure to publish results and the fear of losing one’s pet theory, worst case you’re in the “studies” where ideology drives 90% of it.
Decades not years… the scientific community for the last few decades have been ignoring and suppressing all kinds of different studies and results in almost every field of science! Most celebrity published authors have more than likely lied or tampered with their data (directly or indirectly) in research papers. Really easy to look up and find out about if you take some time to but I’m sure nobody will
This is the case in many fields of "Research". Anyone who presents empirical data about global warming, green energy, or any other narrative driven agenda that does not agree with the agenda is defunded and buried. You saw it happen like crazy during Covid too.
Fun fact about this. Roland Fryer was kicked out of Harvard, and his lab was removed by then-Dean Claudine Gay shortly after he published his findings. Claudine Gay would have the shortest tenure as Harvard's president because she was forced to resign after comments made on antisemitism and plagiarism. Roland Fryer was, without a doubt, targeted and forced out of his institution because of this paper.
Dang. Well were those allegations used to oust him socially ? Even mentioning "allegations" can ruin someone. I believe this deserves more info than just mentioning that there were these so called allegations. There may be allegations about you. Hmm ? Just sayin
Damn thats literally crazy. How can you be fired for simply posting the truth in facts? Harvard has fallen as an institution of "higher learning" and become a place of brain washing
My late uncle was a police officer in Oakland, CA, USA, in the '70s. Very tall. Very white. Very young. He taught me at a very young age to focus on the content of a person's character. His beat was in one of the poorest neighborhoods. The demographic of his beat was factually made up mostly of one race. He was frustrated that protesters focused on the outsized percentage of that race in his tickets and arrests. He would insist that I use logic and critical thinking. He asked why protesters ignore the outsized percentage of that race as the *VICTIMS* of those criminals. He wasn't targeting anyone based on a race or an income bracket. He was responding to, and dealing with, criminal activity. That race and income bracket just happened to be the outsized percentage of his beat.🤷♀️ The innocent residents and business owners in his beat thought that he was wonderful.
This reminds me of a stat that was being used against the Toronto police. It was pointed out that 86% of random stops in this one community were black people. Turns out well over 90% of the community was black. Proportionately, you were actually less likely to be stopped if you were black. That got completely ignored, though.
That gets proven when the more affluent areas have a less arrest. That's the point that police see an easier arrest and conviction with black people over white people. Lawyers cost 30k and you have to show up to court. Cops don't like that because they can lose pay over it. @@LadyVineXIII
@@wegfarir1963 Police were assigned to a beat that they were to patrol on foot, on motorcycles, and in their squad cars. My uncle's beat, that he patrolled alone, was larger geographically than a small city nearby that used at least three officers to patrol during the same time of day. He used to snicker at that. I have no idea how Oakland schedules their patrols now.
The whole 'facts shouldn't be controversial' part of this shouldn't be underestimated. Its the biggest issue we have in the current climate and prevents the truth being told, no matter how uncomfortable it is.
I think it's reasonable to doubt the "facts" and "truth" when they contradict what you thought was previously established. The scientific research must be a subject to critical thinking as well. What's important is that you're able to verify the truth and change your mind when necessary.
Reporting on data is not controversial. He asked if it could be called interesting instead of controversial because it is interesting. Facts are not controversial, they are what they are regardless of everything.
Not if you value comfort. There's a reason they call it a "harsh truth" or "inconvenient truth". Problem is young people value a soft comfortable life more than truth.
Evil hates truth. And our society has been on a moral decline for a while so the backlash is not at all surprising. The government new it had to break up the family and discourage religion.
@@Weshopwizard yes, activists. Unfortunately they're not willing to actually HAVE the real conversations which is why they're "conversations". They push agendas, not conversations.
No its not he is an economist that could have just look up police payouts and the race of them. And that would have changed the process. But he went to police departments and didn't do numbers if officers just a shitty report. @@kenyafromcali
It's so insane that researchers are afraid to publish actual results because of fear. But I do understand them. It takes a strong person to ignore public/popular opinion and still go through and publish the result.
Science has become just as hyper-politicized aseverything else in this world, when you will not publish factual research for fear of political backlash, you are not a researcher, and most scientists today are bought and paid for by big corporations to look like theyre doing something. If we had real, uncorruptable researchers coming together en masse, we wouldnt need fossil fuels anymore. Nikola Tesla was building the bones for that breakthrough of limitless free energy in the 1920s, until JP Morgan( yknow, like the JP Morgan Chase Bank) decided because you couldnt put a meter on it and make money, that he wasnt going to allow it to come to fruition. Point im trying to make is: Corpos= evil and corpos have their fingers in EVERY pie.
As a white woman In the early 2000’s I was in my 30’s and decided to go to college and took criminal justice classes and one of the required classes was on race. It was then my eyes were opened to an agenda being pushed, that made black people feel like victims and white people feel like racists and that we were all awful people. Thankfully, I wasn’t young and impressionable, but I felt awful for both the black students who were made to feel like victims and for the white students, who were made to think it was their fault. The class was led by a black teacher, and I would continually counter the “evidence” the curriculum was trying to shove down our throats. Surprisingly, she actually liked me 😂 But It truly is an agenda from way above even the college level, I believe, to bring race wars to this country and to tear us apart from the inside! Btw, I have watched several of your videos and love your take! Dianne
It would never be a fair fight if only 13% of the population is black, and not all of that 13% believes in the victim mentality. The race hustlers like Al Sharpton, Roland Martin and politicians like Maxine Watters and Cory Booker have tried their best to push the division, but it isn't working. Thanks to this Harvard professor and young scholars like JoJo, the info to empower the black community is out there, if they'll just open their minds to it.
@@AcmeRacing It's interesting to hear both of you say this. I was only 22 when I went and nonetheless I was so much less impressionable than the students who had gone straight from high school and were still in that mindset of the professor is an authority figure instead of just another adult who might not even be that competent.
As a white person - I cannot complain about anything without being labeled 'racist'. Thank you so much to these honest people - saying things that I'm simply _not allowed_ to.
Why do you care about how people that hate you call you? "Racist" sadly doesn't mean anything anymore these days anyways.. Stand your ground and speak up for yourself, otherwise it'll get worse and worse. This stuff needs to end, and it'll only end by speaking up against it and complaining.
@@trime1015 He means they wont listen, and his shit online will get banned. He can stand up for whatever, but on the baseless accusation of racism, they will gaslight themselves out of listening to a word he says whether he speak up or not. I speak up all the time on video games with proximity chat lol. Tell people anything true, your muted or banned in 30 seconds. In person they will just shout over you and stick their fingers in their ears and go "lalalala" like actual children.
USA is a very complex country, on one hand this woke parade of lies is harming minorities. On the other hand, the racists are strong enough to not be afraid to talk and act. Is like a paradox, so is hard to navigate. I met this white guy who came from a poor family, abd yarayara he isn’t the priviliged white guy blacks make up stories at all… he was indeed and factually silenced by minorities and not given the benefits of this woke lie of white supremacy. But my my, did he believe that black women were manly “by nature” ? He did. Did he believe black men were more agressive by racial genes? He did. And I as a latina, talking to him felt like enabling his excuses because while is true he didn’t carry this benefits for being white, he was the guy being pushed down for being white, but he was also lowkey racists. He once made fun of a Native American name of a plase i shared, and scoffed and said “that sound black”… and i was no it isn’t and even if it was why would you react like that? He also told me that latinas are beautiful and the epitome of femenity… only those who are not black. Boy, did I love to show him all my black looking relatives so he could get the memo. So yeah, complain… but still keep yourself in check. Im not twlling you you are racist. But in my opinion, racism is so common in USA, you guys don’t even notice it when you breath it, sleep with it, speak with it. Any race.
@@trime1015 Because it's the government, your own country saying it everyday non-stop. Look at Canada they are making it illegal for Christians to pray. We are not on the right path. That is not freedom. Soon it'll be illegal to have different opinions to the government.
I worked with a black kid at a restaurant in a small town. He was a straight A student, he knew how to study, and knew what he wanted in life and how to achieve it. The problem was his immediate family, who lambasted him for "acting white" since he was articulate and didn't speak in the pidgin English people call "ebonics". He was terrified that his family would "take his black card" for not liking Macaroni and Cheese lol.
My husband took a grad level class on inequality, and she highlighted a black researcher from the 90’s who said that what we have isn’t a racial inequality problem, but a class problem, and the professor dismissed this researcher as “brainwashed by white supremacy”
Which is the real dynamic that's been going on for generations, the trustfund/knows-a-legislator class has rigged the economy against anyone who works for a living. That these classist policies make it harder for families to break into the higher class, and that happens to includes a lot of minorities, is just icing on the cake for some of the 'elite'.
I’m sorry her professor was too brainwashed to consider an alternative theory. Disgusting. I would really like this prof to talk to some of my friends who legally emigrated here from Africa. They are all excelling. They come over and work 2-3 jobs. They don’t accept any governmental assistance for anything. They work through school and become highly paid professionals……they all say that this “white privilege” theory is 150% bull s&*t. They say that African Americans who revel in victimhood as a way to excuse their lack of excellence….are just embarrassing themselves and a few generations down the line their descendants will be embarrassed by them.
So is your position black people are poor because they are black? Because that's insane because theirs plenty that aren't poor and personally that's a crazy racists position you have there. @matthewgilbert9881
In my high school in Connecticut during the early 90s, all black and white students hung together! This is why the race issue of today confuses and annoys me!! I grew up without race issues and only saw people by character, color was not even in my thought process!!
Probably not any more, unfortunately. Thanks to the radical left's efforts to divide everyone.. White vs black, men vs women, straight vs LGTBQ, etc. etc..
This is 100 percent my experience as well in my school during the 90's. My group of friends were a mixture of black, latino, asian and white. We listened to hip hop (tribe, phacyde, de la soul, outkast...) while playing basketball everyday before and after school.
I brought up my son in a very mixed city in the 90's. He was 1 of 2 white kids to make the football team. His friends were a a mix of white, black and brown. They all hung together and he's still friends with the same kids he grew up with. They used to joke around with eachother and no one got offended. He and his friends hate the race division going on today.
It wasn't just like that in Connecticut, the whole country was that way. 80s kids grew up watching the Cosby's and didn't even hardly notice what color the family even was. It honestly didn't even matter to people. In high school, looking back, I was friends with black, white, Hispanic, Hmong, and Native Americans. We never thought to even ask 'what are you '? It honestly mattered least. The first question of a potential friend was, 'what do you like to do', or 'what music do you like?'. If someone seemed fun and cool, that's what mattered. We were taught not to judge a book by the cover. And because lots of kids then were getting into hip hop and rap from all groups, that was cool too.
As much as I love the thought of another Thomas Sowell. I'm not sure anyone can reach the bar. The man is a intellectual savant! He is one of very few people who truly looks at both sides with zero bias.
I’ve been a police officer for 14 years. The job is 1000x more difficult than it was when I started over a decade ago. I thoroughly enjoy watching channels like this, and professors like this trying to show a different perspective than the narrative that has been perpetuated for the last several years. Facts, there are bad people in this world, some of those bad people become all sorts of professionals, we see it every day, and some of those professionals happen to be police. I pride myself in being as unbiased as I can be, we all have bias, and one will never escape that, and not all bias is bad (I also have two masters degrees, one in clinical counseling psychology, and one in forensic psychology). My point is, there are bad cops out there, but most are amazing. We genuinely just want to help out the people in our communities. We want to provide for our families and go home at the end of the night. Don’t ever take what some news outlet says as gospel. Do your own research, like this man right here and find out for yourself what is real, and what isn’t. Reality isn’t the same for everyone, and yes, some people have bad experiences with the police, and that’s their reality. It doesn’t necessarily make it reality for someone else. I do this job because someone has to, do we get paid enough? Does anyone truly get paid enough for the work they put it? I am a white man, married to a black woman with a beautiful biracial 4 year old girl, and I always tell anyone who will listen. If the police treat you wrong, get them the right way. If you are doing everything right, then you should never have any issues with the police, but if you do, don’t stoop to their level. You get them where it hurts, their job, and their liberty and freedom. With all of the cameras and video out there now days, these bad apples are being held accountable. I love having a body cam because it’s helped me out on more than one occasion. Do what you’re told, be respectful, and go about your day. In all honesty, if you see a police officer, thank them. You’d be surprised at how that will make their day. Today, we often get a lot of backlash, and we may have thick skin, but it warms my heart when someone thanks me randomly. Be safe out there, and Jojo, keep up the great content. I love your channel.
The biggest issue with policing in the modern day is that the institution itself has become corrupt and predatory, at this point, good cop, bad cop, doesn’t make a difference because all of you are enforcing unjust laws. It’s why so many cops think nothing of violating someone’s rights, its just part of the job now.
@@mylesleggette4539 hell of a place to talk about grammar and syntax 🤦🏽♀️ have you seen the internet? Also, I’m a writer and even I break the rules. Put some respect on this man
Most cops in the US just finished highschool, then a VERY short training then were given a gun and let unto the streets. Not to mention that the US has some of the SHORTEST training periods for a cop internationally speaking. To become a cop in Europe you have to actually GO TO COP COLLEGE to get yourself some REAL KNOWLEDGE, okay? You know you're the odd duck out against your own in your profession. Stop trying to advocate for literal unchecked undiagnosed low functioning sociopaths just because you happen to work with them. Also cops suffer no consequences in the US for bad behavior a.k.a rape, torture and murder of civilians, be they Black, White, Greys from another dimension. And nope PAID LEAVE while being "investigated" by their buddy-buddies is and SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN considered a punishment. I wish my not-state-protected private job would "investigate" me for embezzlement while I am paid A FULL SALARY and sit at home and eat and do what I want and laugh at the people that think "they really gave it" to me. The maximum "punishment" most cops ever get is being fired(from that police department) and moved to another police department in another area or another state.
My friend grew up with the meanest fists in his neighborhood. Not because he was in a gang. But because people attacked him constantly for being smart, for getting good grades and for being a "race traitor". He's the only one that left and is successful today. He's also a firm believer of black culture being the most detrimental part of the black community. Man is much smarter than me so when he speaks I listen.
"I don't COVET what THEY COVET", Brilliant answer. One of my favorite quotes is, "THe TRUTH is like a LION 🦁, set it free, It needs no defending, It can protect itself".
Not in 2024 it can't, you have to many companies invested/investing in making sure they can exploit you for their own profit. Truth is an obstacle to them, so they have to subvert it, like sleight of hand, look over at these other problems so you don't notice we charge you more, but provide less.
I’m a retired cop from a very large Texas city. This result is consistent with my experience which is the opposite of how it’s dishonestly portrayed by corporate media. The first question we asked when there was a police shooting is what color was the person we shot. We all knew no matter how clean the shoot was, if the person shot was black, the officer was going to get drug through hell.
And who wants to be dragged through hell? i know that I wouldn't. Become vilified in the press, face anger and threats of violence from complete strangers, maybe go through a very public trial, end up losing your job and pension, losing ones family and friends.....what person in their right mind would go looking for that? The corporate media stance is illogical and I believe that they know it, at least most of them do. They're supporting an agenda that creates news and that's the lifeblood of their industry. "If it bleeds, it leads". Racial tension, that leads to violence, is the perfect "bleeding" story.
That certainly makes sense and I've seen the outcome, in which cops are more reluctant to shoot a black perpetrator than a white perpetrator, referred to as the Ferguson Effect.
Plus if I may, I’d like to think it’s common sense when people really think about it that if a cop or anyone points a gun at you 1st then for the most part. They’re giving your pretty good reasoning for you to fire at them in retaliatory self defence. I mean is it me or does the so called “Law” that’s ironically unlawful in many other ways, not see self defence as mostly black and white with some shades of grey with a bit of red??? How bad is the “qualified immunity” terror threat out there in the Texas State jurisdiction anyways?? Is it safe to say you guys are inherently anti 2nd amendment also?? given the ironically criminally deplorable nature of said “qualified immunity” sir??
What allowed this man to make the choice to publish the truth, regardless of the consequences, is his high level of integrity. I wish everyone could be like that.
@@crazybadkid08 didn't use to be. race didn't use to matter, so why does it matter again now? we went from segregating by race, to no more division we're all part of the same group, to segregation again.
At 20:37 the interviewer asks how he made the decision to publish his findings, she says that many (possibly including her) would not have….and there we have the answer to many of society’s ills today: group cowardice but with a righteous loud voice. Bury truth for conformity.
It is multi facetted. Racism is a tool used in 5th generation unlimited warfare ( we will discuss who we are at war with at the end) in order to keep division in society... Black against white. Police against citizen. Export jobs to create unemployment, which creates strife, creating drug additions from depression, homelessness. Other facets are, control media, and companies, to push sexual deviancy like Budweiser and Dillan Mulvaney. Who owns Blackrock and Vanguard? Target, with its gender bending clothing. Soros in buying DA's to let criminals back on the street( damaging safety and increasing police workload and at the same time, plus lowering the criminals fear of the law). Teachers unions have been subverted and teachers teach LGBTQ stuff rather than educate students, which drops the academic standards again creating joblessness and strife, particularly in Democrat cities. There are other facets, but who are we at war with, that's the real question. The WEF wants a one world government and Klaus Schaub is a Rothschild of the Private Central Bank(PCB)0 family. The US constitution is the only thing stopping the bankers from controlling the world because of the 1st and 2nd amendments. Gods in the way with the inalienable rights (1st) and guns in the way( 2nd). No one else has God given rights and constitutional gun rights. The Banksters need God removed so that the Banksters can replace God and guns, well look at Canada , the people don't have a right to protect themselves when a dictator takes over. The Banks plan. Break the Federal Reserve( a division of the PCB) , take over the assets of the loans ( which is the country and people of the USA) dispose of the constitution, and voila, no more God or 2nd amendment. Then now subject to the whims of what the un elected owners of your country are willing to allow you to have in place of the lost Constitutional rights This is not just a Police thing, this is Unrestricted warfare and General Michael Flynn has written a book on this subject to outline in depth how are enemies are dividing and conquering all of our countries. And who owns majority control of control of Pfizer and most other Mega Corporations, why it is the greedy PCB, our true enemy, that always will hunger for more, until they have it all. And the US constitution is standing in the way, but will be thrown out in bankruptcy and the real life Hunger Games will begin. remember, Where We Go 1 We Go All. 17 Worldwide. Love from Canada
It's because if you say anything against the left wing narrative the will do whatever it takes to destroy you. All but the most famous/influential have no hope of surviving. I wish there were a better answer or moreover a solution.
And burying the truth after seeing it is just the tip of the iceberg, most of the time people completely avoid looking at what they shouldn't see. In this case, he did this study because he expected to find a "non-controversial" result. Otherwise, he might not have wanted to do it, or anyway he wouldn't have received any funding.
A similar thing happened in the UK recently. The government did an investigation into 'institutional racism'. The conclusions in the report were that economic conditions had a much better correlation to poor life outcomes than race, and in fact so did geography, there being a correlation between poverty and where you live. If you came from a poor area then you would suffer poor life outcomes no matter your race. Now the next question would have been 'why are areas deprived and how can we fix that', but that couldn't even be thought about due to the $#!! storm that followed due to the report coming up with the 'wrong' answers.
People tried to tell all the people rioting about police brutality not being what they believed and no one listened! People like this man won’t be heard in the national media or schools where it needs to be heard and taught.
Four years is a "blink in time". Change has never been instant. We are all having a big conversation that never ends. Focus on what your goals are and don't get distracted by momentary failures.
To be fair, you have to keep in mind that the riots came during covid, when tensions were already increasing for the simple fact that the pandemic was making life harder for almost everyone, and the catalyst (aka George Floyd's death) DID happen, and in fact could be categorized as the first kind of police interaction with criminals (interaction without shootings), the one where the researcher himself states that there IS some racial bias present in police behaviour
This Professor reminds me of Thomas Sowell who I have so much respect for. Keep speaking the facts, Professor. Good for you for your courage and determination and hard work to educate the public about facts and the truth.
Power to this man for branching out to a group of people he didn't like for the sake of truth. I was a cop for 20 years and I found it impossible to explain to people how difficult of a job it is. Not only is it difficult it forces you to be jaded on humanity. You deal with so many bad people that your view gets warped to treat everyone with caution. I wish it weren't the case, but alas.
I feel more and more blessed all the time to have spent my formative years in a _very_ diverse (racially and economically), completely integrated (in name _and_ in practice) area of the Deep South. I was in an interracial relationship for most of my teen years, and the only time we ever got a sideways look or a rude comment was during a school trip to NYC. I'm also glad that integrated didn't mean we didn't all have cool things from our heritage that we shared with one another. It just meant that different heritages didn't mean we were in different communities.
The self-effacing nature of this man! The way he acknowledges his own bias, his own prejudices, and then subsequently calls HIMSELF out is so refreshing. This man is a true academic! He has an answer he wants, but he does not call foul when the evidence does not match up to his preconceptions. Testing research to prove an answer is not wrong - it is how we confirm that what we are seeing is true. It's when we turn our back on facts to perpetuate the preconceived notions that breaks the logic. Thank you, sir, for your dedication to truth. And thank you LFR JoJo for posting this video so that his message - and your own - is shared with even more viewers!
Unfortunately, people believe what they want despite evidence to the contrary. As a 65 year old white guy who grew up during the civil rights era I thought we would be so much further along by now. Do I understand what it means to be black, no, of course not. But, I want to see us all as "Americans" first. Why do people seek to divide us instead of unite us?
I graduated high school in 2003 from a half white half black school racism was never a issue or even a topic of conversation we never thought about it and got along just fine we were further along like you said this problem has been manufactured by the people that are really running the country
15:10 I'm a woman who bumped up against this in the worst way back in the late 80's. I had a bad experience and ended up at the hospital and a particular type of "crisis" center. The 'counseling' was in group format and what I saw in these groups confused and horrified me. There was a serious intent to make victims feel like... victims. I was was looking for empowerment so I could rise above my experience, be smarter, be stronger, and live life NOT as a victim. Oh, they did NOT like that. The story is long so I'll spare readers the details, but I had a revelation that I was excited to share with the group. Yes, the criminal was wrong. Not denying that. But there were so many small mistakes (and a few big ones) that I realized would've spared me the whole experience. I was naive and, in retrospect, I could've avoided trouble. Lessons learned. I don't have to live my life in fear if I walk in wisdom. I didn't have to be a victim. I was going to grow and be okay. When I shared this in group - I am not exaggerating this one bit - the counselors locked the door and rearranged the chairs in a circle with me in the center. They had the other women scream at me with all their force, "It's not your fault!" This wasn't done in a spirit of compassion. This was an extended rage session that I wasn't permitted to leave. After about twenty minutes things were beginning to get physical. The women were so worked up that they'd escalated to shaking and shoving me. The only way out was for me to lie and agree with them. Even then, it took time for me to get them to stop. The counselors made me repeat multiple phrases over and over again and insisted that I scream them at the top of my lungs. When I got out of there I can honestly say that I felt as violated as I did from the incident itself. But it was different in one respect. The man only violated my body. These women tried to violate my mind and soul. (And their assault went on much longer.) Other things I'd witnessed that had bothered me moved to the front of my thoughts. I wasn't seeing good results. I was watching the 'counseling' guide victims into nervous breakdowns. Sessions where women fantasized about torturing their assaulters were numerous. Low level criminal activity (putting sugar in their assaulters gas tank type-things) were almost encouraged. When charges weren't pressed against an assaulter, plans were concocted for other women to entrap them. I know that one of those plans were almost made reality, but I don't think anyone went through with it. Women went in strong and angry and came out weak, bitter, obsessed, and broken. One woman actually ended up attempting suicide and another was hospitalized for a suicide watch. Man hating was absolutely where everyone was being led. Every man was a potential criminal and the were born with their primary 'weapon' between their legs. Real sick stuff. The next day I snapped and went to our town's mental health center. See, I doubted myself. Who am I to go against the 'experts'? These counselors were trained and had years of experience. Maybe I'm missing something. I was given a wonderful counselor and he told me that they spend WAY too much time patching together women who went through that rape crisis center. Found out that they weren't trained at all. They were nothing more than a nest of bitter feminists who'd hung a sign on their door. My doubts and rejection of their philosophies were validated and, through the counseling itself, I learned a LOT about radical feminism. This is the philosophy that tried to break me and it was essential that I understand it. The counselor never said it, but in my mind this was a cult. Yes, I hit the library and learned *a lot* about cults and the techniques and foundational beliefs are no different, as far as I could tell. The purpose of the cult is to cultivate dependency on the cult and to rob the individual of their own strength, thoughts, and independent power. Anyone who expresses independent thought - or even asks the 'wrong' questions - is treated like an enemy and violently put back in their place. I have enough to say about this subject that could fill a book, so I'll stop here; but it's essential to understand these things about the left. I haven't found one aspect of leftist ideology that doesn't fit the same bill. I've seen this plenty on the religious right, so don't think 'my side' is immune. These are very human patterns and the better we understand them, the more resilient we are against them. Keep an open mind, but don't let your brains fall out. Be suspicious of ANY ideology that tells you that you are the problem and that you are powerless without them.
That is nuts. I did years of DV counseling and group therapy and never did it become anything close to that. If this is still going on, the organization needs to be reported, especially if they are getting tax dollars.
That's scary. I saw my brother get shot in a burglary and the first thing we did was break down what happened and what we could have done better. IMO that is what you should do. I'm glad you escaped that shit. Now for the controversial part of my comment. Feminism as a movement is steeped in Marxist philosophy which means the oppressed/oppressor narrative is central. In order to maintain that view they have to convince themselves that innocent men are inherently violent and that they are constantly being victimized. This world view is very damaging to both sides.
What a horrible experience! It sounds like a communist struggle session. I am glad you found real counselors eventually. Thank you for your comment. It was very informative. Maybe you should really write a book about it, if you want it. I think it might be an important book.
@@AliciaGuitar one great way to shut that down would be to claim sexual assault. they were physically touching her and it was unwanted contact. open and shut case right there. Of course people would claim women aren't capable of doing that, much less a center for victims, but hey, they did EXACTLY what the definition of assault is.
It’s a sad thing indeed that just being honest and not a coward is such a high bar in academia and the workplace that those few people that display these basic traits are now considered Brave. What a shameful society we’re manifesting.
Wow! Man, what a great video. I found your channel through your father's channel, watched a video & subbed instantly. You're looking at things that aren't easy or comfortable, necessarily & I applaud you for it. Truth, facts & reality are invaluable and you're willing to look into & discuss things that so many people refuse to. 👍
This is so good, the interviewer, the professor, and your commentary. I was saying in my head "how is a researcher controversial" just a moment before you paused with the same observation.
A general rule of thumb... "Follow the money". Research results showing some type of inequity/controversy/panic inducing finding always generate attention. Those studies are used by special interest groups (or those disguised as such), universities, etc. to panhandle for funding for additional research, which typically back up the original findings to get more funding for special educational programs/restructurings/social programs to "correct" the perceived issue. You also get private companies that sprout up to sell some type of training or advisory contracts to companies and governments on the issue. An entire economic system gets built upon the issue. On the other hand, if research shows a perceived issue doesn't actually exist, there's nothing for anyone to spend any money on. This is why the backlash is so severe. The longer it goes on, the more people there are who's livelihoods, incomes and reputations are completely reliant on these "findings". Instead of actually considering the results, they'd rather just silence the opposition and get back to work. And remember... Statistics can easily be manipulated to support whatever narrative you want to push.
Mad respect. Many would bend the results to get the answer they expect. He did not. Acepting results that go against your narative is hard for any person. Its a fault many scientist fail at.
Brave man. He is a truth seeker, as academics are supposed to be. He wouldn't compromise the truth, despite the cost. Hats off, world needs many more like you.
Researchers can be controversial by posting bad data. It's really common for research papers to have cherry picked, insufficient, or sometimes outright falsified data and still get peer reviewed. Very few papers can stand up to close scrutiny. This guy is exceptional in that he listened to the data that he dug up.
.. Racism is a tool used in 5th generation unlimited warfare ( we will discuss who we are at war with at the end) in order to keep division in society... Black against white. Police against citizen. Export jobs to create unemployment, which creates strife, creating drug additions from depression, homelessness. Other facets are, control media, and companies, to push sexual deviancy like Budweiser and Dillan Mulvaney. Who owns Blackrock and Vanguard? Target, with its gender bending clothing. Soros in buying DA's to let criminals back on the street( damaging safety and increasing police workload and at the same time, plus lowering the criminals fear of the law). Teachers unions have been subverted and teachers teach LGBTQ stuff rather than educate students, which drops the academic standards again creating joblessness and strife, particularly in Democrat cities. There are other facets, but who are we at war with, that's the real question. The WEF wants a one world government and Klaus Schaub is a Rothschild of the Private Central Bank(PCB)0 family. The US constitution is the only thing stopping the bankers from controlling the world because of the 1st and 2nd amendments. Gods in the way with the inalienable rights (1st) and guns in the way( 2nd). No one else has God given rights and constitutional gun rights. The Banksters need God removed so that the Banksters can replace God and guns, well look at Canada , the people don't have a right to protect themselves when a dictator takes over. The Banks plan. Break the Federal Reserve( a division of the PCB) , take over the assets of the loans ( which is the country and people of the USA) dispose of the constitution, and voila, no more God or 2nd amendment. Then now subject to the whims of what the un elected owners of your country are willing to allow you to have in place of the lost Constitutional rights This is not just a Police thing, this is Unrestricted warfare and General Michael Flynn has written a book on this subject to outline in depth how are enemies are dividing and conquering all of our countries. And who owns majority control of control of Pfizer and most other Mega Corporations, why it is the greedy PCB, our true enemy, that always will hunger for more, until they have it all. And the US constitution is standing in the way, but will be thrown out in bankruptcy and the real life Hunger Games will begin. remember, Where We Go 1 We Go All. 17 Worldwide. Love from Canada
I really appreciate that you don’t try to pretend like you know everything. Being able to admit to things you don’t know (even something as small as a police officer’s salary) is what makes you a wise person. It shows you aren’t afraid to be yourself and don’t just follow the crowd and repeat the things you hear. I’ve subscribed and look forward to more videos.
I’m a white man, I started working at an iron foundry in ‘94. My dad was an electrician there and I wanted to become skilled trades rather than be production. The foundry was about 80% black and I made lots of friends in production but when I took the test to become skilled trades I got the top score which meant I got first choice at what trade I wanted. I lost over half my friends because of that success and all of those friends were black. Some took the test too and failed. I was called a traitor when I was going to school for electrician and while working there as an apprentice and journeyman. I never really understood that but seeing stuff like this makes me understand better
In the 80’s and 90’s these things were very common for black people, and forget being black and liking any music other than rap. I had a black friend that loved rock and roll and at my house he would come over to listen to music with me. But he only ever asked me for one favor and I did, he asked me to never tell anyone , period. So I wanted to know why.. He said he’d be disowned completely and would have no friends left. I said you will have one I promise but I got it. But that really bothered me to know that just one thing can change your life.
@@unknowntitan5884 I guess we're at a standoff. We don't know the guy so we can't verify it. How about this for a solution. We believe that it's true but we don't use it as evidence, because it's unverifiable, until we meet the black person who it allegedly happened to, so he can confirm or deny that it ever happened. I think that's a better solution than calling someone a liar.
@@unknowntitan5884 Are you really going to pretend that these type of things aren't common? When in the black community you're outcasted or labeled corny, nerd, lame for speaking properly, doing your homework, having hobbies that doesn't revolve around sports or rap, playing instrument or drawing aka "acting white/speaking white"
"If you haven't figured out who to vote for, you ain't black". Social forces are very strong and it takes courage and self confidence to break out. hopefully this is changing with people like Larry Elder, Candace Owens and ABL (Anthony Brian Logan) being articulate, intelligent and entertaining or worth listening to.
Jojo, this is the first video of yours that I've seen. I thank the algorithm for this encounter. I really like your energy, curiosity and geekiness tbh. Looking forward to more.
The man is a true researcher, or "Data Nerd" as he put it. It's a mindset that is sadly becoming less and less appreciated by academics as the education system seeks to become more political and less professional. @Jojo, I commend you for keeping up with your family's tradition to keep an open mind and review pretty much anything. It's a great way to learn about things that you never would have thought of on your own. Albert Einstein has a quote that ends with the mantra, "Always maintain holy curiosity."
Exactly they cannot handle finding out their beliefs are in fact wrong to the extent you would think if you found out something you thought true was found to be false then you would stop having that belief you know "grow" but no they double down it's the craziest most psychotic thing I have ever seen.
that depends, there are a LOT of bs "research" that set out to find x, and no matter what data they get that goes against it, they will do anything in their ability to make the data fit their pre-established conclusion. Be it by sample size, statistics fuckery or other methods. There is a LOT of both money and political power invested in multiple narratives and stagnation, or for a certain direction of research NOT to be researched, be it due to interest of money and/or power. Take the lgbt+ agenda, it is now a multi billion dollar industry making sure their investments don't fall, same with race baiting, and the current anti Anglo agenda all over the place. It all comes down to money and power investments. tldr; all of life and it's happenings, comes down to logistics and how to control or manipulate it
Yes please. Do continue with the rest of the video. This is the first time I'm hearing of this and I'd like to hear more. I think it's good to be open to many perspectives
These kinds of papers do get published in various ways. Either in peoples books or through various groups. But they are mostly buried or ignored and not talked about. This is not actually a new thing. it's just getting more exposure than it ever has before.
It’s controversial because there’s a particular narrative (lie) being pushed and the truth is against that and all he was doing was sharing the FACTUAL truth.
my man...i have seen a few of your reaction videos. i dont know much about you but your thoughtfulness is refreshing. you are going to be very important to our nation if you continue on your track. hoping you don't let your successful channel slow you down on your pursuit of greatness. new subscriber
Thank you so much Jojo for showing this. It's popped up in my feed before but I knew I would enjoy your reaction and opinion. I truly appreciate this professor. He needs to be protected at all costs and it breaks my heart that he has received so much vitriol for speaking truth through his hard work, time, writings and studies. I look forward to seeing more from him and can only pray that young people, of all colors, will listen and learn from his wisdom.
Anytime you see something that doesn't make sense and media is pushing it, ask yourself who stands to make money off of it? Politicians? Special interest groups? Non-profits? After they get that money where does it go?
A student of mine had an absolute panic attack when he was going to be tapped for Honor Society - it would destroy his image and he'd lose his friends. Sad.
The police are under NO OBLIGATION TO PROTECT! SCOTUS is VERY CLEAR on this point. If they don’t have an obligation to stop an active shooter in a high school, they have no obligation to protect your family.
@@Youre-WelcomeOP is correct. "This principle was established in the landmark case Warren v. District of Columbia, where the court ruled that the police do not have a constitutional duty to protect individual citizens from harm. The Supreme Court has ruled that under no circumstances are the police obligated to help you."
@notmoose8670 To be fair, SC had to say that. Otherwise, every time a family member dies when an officer is around, the family can sue the PD. It would set a terrible precedent if they ruled that way. Most officers do protect and serve, but no, they are not obligated to do as such.
People took the whole "I think therefore I am." And added right to the end. 😑 props to the researchers that post the data regardless of if they agree with it!
63k is national average for police officer, I was Military Police and hated it so much I reclassified to Intelligence, several Police Departments offered me a position when I finished my 2 enlistment, I just told them I do not have the mental attitude anymore.
I had my mom spend thousands to try and get me a good education. I got friggin liquidified with how much shit got into my head, most I didn't even use nowadays. I grinded my head like no other, I have absolutely no social life now, I can't even talk properly to people, all that comes out is too technical for casual talking. I've spent years of my life to reach a dead-end job. What a blessing, right? Whoever thinks that anyone have it easy due to appearances never had to actually work hard to get stuff.
You are absolutely correct about people self segregating based on race when they enter a room. People will move towards those they think they have something on common with. It can take weeks for the group to start to blend. With everything, there are a few exceptions to the rule.
Grew up in a mixed community. Friend group was always mixed. My best friend in elementary school was black. Always at each other’s houses, going places with either his mom or my dad and I saw firsthand how he got treated by others from “his community” for being honor roll. Before I even hit puberty this was the case. Also, unrelated by the first experience of some race related shit was with him and his cousin. Had to be around 10 or 11 and we were heading back to our next neighborhood when, what I now know was some militant black dude stopped his car, hopped out and started talking shit about how I was the enemy and they shouldn’t be hanging around me 😂. Outside of that and a few other instances of kids hurling slurs (both ways) and fighting the racial thing was something we were aware of but it was something we didn’t really care about. What chance we had for all that to die out was lost with my generation because it was such a non issue with us. When identity politics started really gaining traction in the late 2010’s we lost the ability to actually talk about it a sane manner and find common ground. That was a different world it seems. Born in 88 for timeline reference.
i worked in a baltimore city school and the kids were pretty adamant about it being lame to do well in school or try. The kids took to me as i was just a tutor and not an authority figure really so i got a lot of kids to realize it felt good to do well. Hopefully that stuck with them
As someone who's been at university for almost a decade, the sad part is I find myself avoiding interaction with black people because I feel like I have to walk on egg shells as I could get screwed if they perceive our interaction as bad
In today’s universities, we never undertake research if the resulting conclusions might hurt anyone’s feelings OR if the results disprove the cultural narrative. If we accidentally do the research and it does either of these things, we refuse to publish the results. This is referred to as the feminization of higher education.
Let's remember that Gay, the ex-Harvard dean tried to have him fired over false allegations of "improprieties". That's how evil she is - and she still has her job as professor with a $900K salary. These are the corrupt people society has to get rid of or there will never be any progress. I would totally support it if Fryer got Gay's job. He demonstrated his intellectual honesty and that's worth more than anything else.
The first time I was pulled over, I had a gun pulled on me for opening my door instead of rolling down my window(window was broken , so i made both of my hands visible and announced that the window was broken as I opened the door) I was 18 at the time, clean record(still clean record 💪), and am white. The cop was a black woman. Had i been abrasive and non-compliant, it would have gotten very ugly very fast, as the cop mentioned to me many times throughout our interaction. Even with the compliance she attempted to tie me to someone from another city who "matched my profile" who had my exact same middle and last name and same car apparently. She used that as an excuse to search my car, thankfully nothing was planted or found. Not claiming victim, i just think this example may provide insight for many people who may use similar situations to claim victimhood where they arent victims. Claiming victim where its not warranted takes attention away from people who may actually be victimized and muddies the water of any attempt to come up with realistic data/solutions.
I had a similar experience. Was leaving a football game in hs and apparently my tags expired due to them being from a bonded title. It was my birthday so I got gifted a expensive cigar which was on the dash. I grew up in southern dallas so I rolled the windows down, keys on the dash, lights on and hands on the wheel. Still had the car searched, was asked if I had narcotics and lean, and was charged for tobacco (cigar was never put into evidence). I want to say this tho. The initial cop was the problem with tiny man syndrome. Out of the 4 squad cars that showed up he was the problem. The rest comforted me and offered me water etc. But no one listened because I have “white privilege” and “have no idea”.
One of my buddies in high school was a really smart, and studious black guy. Really knew his stuff. But everytime we got our tests back, his were marked low despite getting most of the answers right.
Turns out...he had the teachers put a low grade at the top, and his real grade at the bottom real small...because he got tired of being bullied by other black kids for "acting white."
This is crazy
That is so depressing poor guy.
That’s sad but I’m hella proud of him for finding a solution to the problem rather than just doing bad on purpose.
Clever kid!
@@Vaillleindeed. The never ending ingenuity of human beings is awesome. See the obstacle, and adapt to get around it. I imagine he did well in life...
Sad, but I think the same things happen to working class white kids. Their peers don't like the idea of being left behind.
OK, I was a white kid in a severely underfunded, isolated rural public school... I'm so envious that the kids in your school got a chance to take a test to go to a better school, and super pissed that they didn't take it seriously! I would have chewed off an arm to have even a 1/100000000 chance to get into a better environment. And now as an adult I have to listen to these same people talk about how privileged I was... they have NO idea.
But hey, congratulations to you for appreciating your chances and taking them! It isn't easy to ignore the peanut gallery.
Your description is more prevalent than the white privilege narrative they keep pushing. My area did well academically but we were always held back because we didn’t have the diversity these elites were looking for to prop. Some in the area have been fortunate to come from good families, but a good handful unfortunately were not. It drove me nuts because the average house medium was way below the state’s exceptions, and we have a history of promising students but this region is severely neglected.
I remember seeing a documentary (probably pbs) about some black kids in a northeast (i think) school. One girl was pretty smart but she said she couldn't get too good grades or study because everyone would get on her case and ask her why she was trying to be white. I didn't even know what to think about this as it was expected of kids in my family to study things and learn things to have options in life. I also did not think studying was only for people with lighter skin color - seems absurd to say it out loud. I thought it was a real shame that her so-called friends were trying to hold her back from success.
@@happyzahn8031yeah, stupidity being praiseworthy in that culture, is so ffin dumb XD
You were extremely privileged in your childhood just because you’re white. Not accepting it doesn’t mean you never had this privilege
Data is called controversial when people don't want to accept it
It’s called controversial when then study is taken from a controlled group of people. I can only be responsible for myself as a person, not a whole race. Thank god for free will….cause only dead fish go with the flow.
There is data that contradicts his claim. And there is a reason white people will weaponize 911 against black people. They know the police are like their personal bodyguard.
Data that you cannot vet and refuse open source is controversial.
As famously said, "There are lies, damn lies and statistics."@@greenlightstudios3816
Data that goes against what the masses want to make you believe is controversial.
What drove him to publish against the narrative was integrity. What is right is right. Truth is truth.
Yea yea😂😂😂
Integrity and honesty is what is missing in America….the country would be a lot better off if people would just tell the truth and just be honest with people. Good or bad just tell the truth.
Race baiting GRIFTER!!!..to call him what he is !!!!!....virtue signalling waste of time!!!!!
"Waah!" Waah'"!££££%
True. The difference between "blacks" and "whites" is nothing compared to the difference between truth-tellers and liars. Where's the line, anyway?
*Political communitarianism is a scourge.* The United States should have understood by now that *there are all shades of human skin* , from the darkest to the lightest, and that *this "black or white" thing is just a really bad joke.*
Yet you all still speak of human "races" on this continent, and even more in North America (at least it seems to me). Why is that? Do you really *believe* in races? Religiously maybe? How do you define human races in biology?
What we are talking about here is essentially censorship and corruption within the scientific community... and yes, what the dude is telling us here reminds me of what the court said in Galileo's trials although in Galileo's case the theory wasn't yet good enough while here there don't seem to be any valid scientific objections to it.
The irony of him needing a police security detail to protect him from the people saying that people that look like him are being harmed by the police.
Well observed!!!!!!!
Funny but sad. Equally sad and ironic is that there are more professors engaged in covering up the truth rather than seeking it at an institution of higher learning.
It’s the inner city black culture. No fathers in the home. The more kids they have the larger their welfare checks, provided there is no father in home. No school choice. We can’t forget all the abortion clinics located in the black communities. What kind of chances do they have?
How dare he suggest that we are not less?
@@ricksmith3907 damn brought the racism out in full force today I see
I'm a white guy, and I grew up in a small town where there were no black people at all. Not until I was in high school did a black family move to our town. So I had NO EXPERIENCE around black people growing up while white. The only reference I had was my grandfather, who was prejudiced. At age 19 I got a job in a predominantly black and hispanic neighborhood. Several of the other employees were black. What did I think as a white guy?? No. Instead I thought I KNOW I have no experience around black people and I have no idea what to expect. So...the only thing I knew was to think nothing different. It's just more people. After two weeks my black co-workers were calling me "blood." That's when I knew I was not messing up. Treating them like I treat everyone is exactly how it should be. Now.....THIS is what I figured out on my own, yet "they," the people creating the narratives, want you and me to believe I am inherently racist BECAUSE I am white. No, they just want to divide us Americans. Don't let them. Don't let them tell you how things are when you are not seeing it.
1. All brains work basically the same, using pattern recognition to identify and anticipate things. Brains also work by "completing" patchy information. Brains are therefore bound to err, but the beauty is they would not even err otherwise, they'd just be incapable of doing anything.
2. Race (i.e. skin color, basically, notwithstanding its scientific irrelevance), biologically speaking, depends on genetics. People's genetics depend on population genetics. Population genetics depending on sexual intercourse, it depended until recently on geography. (Today it is easier to travel great distances and relocate even to another continent.) Geography determined human geography and therefore culture. So there you have it: until recently, race, as a geographical marker, had cultural and therefore social implications.
3. In other words, whatever your race, when you scan your environment, you immediately identify people as same race or other, among many other things. That's simply visual pattern recognition, and absolutely everybody performs it, save the blind. Whether you are black, white, Native American, oriental, Autronesian, Aboriginal Australian, Melanesian, Martian or Venusian.
4. Whatever your race, as you compute your visual data, you deal with many other sets of information which will allow various types of associations and anticipations, according to your personal and cultural experience (no need to call it a bias at this stage, though it will often incorporate all sorts of biases). For instance, if you live in a continent where most people have always looked (at least until recently) quite distinct from other continents' people, you will automatically assume that such a distinct individual, in your continent, is likely to be a foreigner, speak differently, etc.
5. Thus, whatever your "race", when you come across people from another "race", you register the difference and instantly operate with lots of information, where associations and anticipations kick in. Such associations and anticipations need absolutely not be racist, in terms of negative feelings and readiness to be hostile in any way towards the other, but they can be regarded as racist in a weaker sense, forgivable, of registering facts and instinctively guessing at the situation... based on "race" (among so many other things).
6. It is in this weaker, purely neurophysiological sense, I believe, that we all are "racist". To this "racism" we must add certain things that affect diferently the different "races", which may be detrimental or advantatgeous to people from those other "races". It is obvious that in recent history, white people were privileged more often than not, relative to people from other races when they crossed eachother. Such privilege lingers on, even when we reject it to the extent that it might benefit us. Things evolve and may improve, but it takes time. Privilege is in-built, structural, and often unnoticed, especially by the privileged, sometimes denied, even by the unprivileged. Social, cultural, and psychological inertia is a factor.
7. Political dynamics can sometimes sour and take bad turns, making society regress. There are always bad actors ready to exploit that potential, fueling divisiveness, including "racial" or "immigration" issues. That's when racism isn't anymore in the weak sense and takes its stronger meaning of nasty prejudice and active discrimination.
8. There are numerous ways to suffer from a disadvantage or benefit from an advantage. Some are connected with race, others with social class, or other family characteristics. One can be white and poor, endure abusive parents, lack of opportunities, etc., and yet, simply for being white, still benefit from certain things that, say, a black person may not enjoy, basically for being black. This, which should be obvious, is often denied and exploited by politicians that fuel the very racism they deny. Nonetheless, this is compatible with some people who still suffer racism, today, affording to react and become racist themselves in response. That is an unfortunate and undesirable thing, since all racisms are bad, but in a way, a sign of progress, because said people, in the past, could not afford to become racist or at least express it. When someone can afford to be racist and even be racist without realizing it, that's some level of privilege. Their ancestors could not afford it. It is unfortunate when someone falls into racism, but at least, racism is getting more diversified and democratic so to speak: everybody can now be a racist or a victim of racism in its stronger sense.
9. Some people who were and often still are less privileged than you, not being white (and I am only talking about race-related privilege here, i.e. "white privilege"), can indeed, today, be racist against, or relative to, whites. Many people who maybe suffered more racism, or became more sensitive to it for whatever reasons, might become so-called "woke" activists fanatically, exagerating things, falling into hatred and so-called reverse racism (which obviously exists in spite of some "expert" anti-racists' denial). But, importantly, not all anti-racists and "woke" activists fall into that. Most progressives actually don't, by far. It is an evil political discourse, veering towards fascism, that tries to present all anti-racists, activists, ONGs, leftists/progressives/liberals as anti-white, "woke" (understood as voodoo), "communist" (understood as totalitarian if not satanical), etc.
@@nomcognom2414 - Thank you for laying out why you believe people are racist.
My post was simple. I grew up with no black people in my life. At age 19 I had employment with several black employees. I chose to not interact with them in any way different from all the people I interacted with previously. What I was doing was ignoring my grandfather's prejudiced views. I found, other than some slight vocabulary differences, that these black employees were no different from the rest of the fellow Americans I interacted with, and myself.
This did not demonstrated any racism. It only demonstrated a new experience, like *any* new experience; not knowing what to expect, and entering into the experience with an open mind.
@@1001Hobbies, racism is a word that has various meanings, like most other words, I guess. Sometimes, especially with words regarding issues that lend themselves to politicization, the existence of different meanings is deliberately ignored or exploited to manipulate people. This, politically, is used for mass deception, indoctrination, and radicalization.
I am not a social scientist but I'll give you my opinion that it would have been better to avoid the word "racism" to describe what I called racism in its weaker sense, i.e. guessing at people and/or unconscious white privilege. BTW, I'd like to distinguish between innocently guessing at people (such as "he's brown in Finland, therefore likely a foreigner", or "she's white in Lesotho, therefore likely a foreigner"), when people just make innocent guesses being aware they are just assessing probabilities, on one hand, and, on the other hand, people whose way to "guess" at strangers is "he's brown in Finland, therefore he MUST be ready or seeking to commit a crime, and I will treat him "accordingly", whatever he may say and however he may try to fool me". The second type of "guessing" is pure racism, in its stronger meaning. Another example, of course, would also be "she's white, therefore a neocolonialist" (in Lesotho, Israel, or wherever)", or "she's white, therefore a racist" (in Lesotho and wherever)".
Since people do increasingly use "racism" in that first weaker sense, I am obliged to agree that, to that extent, we are all "racists". But then, we should be cautious to prevent people becoming convinced or even convincing us that racism is everywhere and that we all are, especially those racially privileged, badly or damagingly racist, in a stronger sense. Racism has at least two different meanings for me, and I will disagree with any discourse that mixtures them into a single meaning of bad racism which would simply exist along some gradient, going from unwitting and mild to deliberate and superevil.
Other than in that first meaning of the word, I don't think you and I can be said to be "racists", and I won't let people go unanswered if they try to imply that I am a racist and I should feel bad about it. Which doesn't mean that you or I could never perpetrate some microracism without even realizing it. I think all human beings are susceptible of occasional microracism, like making a very poor guess and upsetting somebody, based on "race". Same goes for ethnicity, "social class", religion, sex, sexual orientation, etc. We can just be wrong, sometimes, in some ugly way. Also, traditional or widespread prejudice may sometimes be a cultural reality still affecting us, or contaminating us, residually or occasionally, in spite of our egalitarian ideas and care to avoid prejudice. If we become aware or are proven that in some case, we should just be humbled and learn the lesson. Such mistakes, when smaller and rare, don't define us. The smaller and the rarer, and the more they embarrass us, the more we should be appreciated as non racists. Some will interpret this as a naive avowal of racism, "maybe lighter but still racism", but it isn't. They will be mixing different different things by construing phenomenon A (1st meaning of racism) as phenomenon B (2nd and worse meaning of racism), only towards its milder side of the spectrum. Nope, we are not on that spectrum. I might some day embarrass myself, but that embarrassment would be precisely why I shouldn't feel shame to be how I am. If it ever happens to you, it will be proof of your not being a "racist", precisely.
@@nomcognom2414 - OK, you go ahead and always process what to think about someone based on their color and your automatic preconceived notions about what they are like because of their color....and I will just continue to form my opinions and views on someone based on my interaction with that particular individual, no matter their race.
@@nomcognom2414 - Have you ever heard of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.?
What's a black professor?
Is Neil DeGrasse Tyson a black Astrophysicist?
What about Barrack Obama was he in the office of black president.
The US needs to stop prefacing everything with a colour.
That would be a start.
It is what it is. Black people are referred to as black. Also, him being black is relevant as he is proving their is an anti-white bias. A white professor tries that, and may be called racist. A black professor on the other hand will be taken more seriously, then a white professor. That is why his race is mentioned.
it makes people click on videos and articles, people will likely never stop using color for their own benefit
It’s relevant b/c people may be more likely to trust the data
Well those said people ALWAYS refer to their color..
@@kmanz60 it's not relevant, stupid people think it's relevant
He didn't accidentally do anything. He found an unexpected result and told the truth about it after doing his due diligence. Absolute epitome of a Professor using his science, putting his own feelings aside to tell the truth. A great man.
So basically, he said that researchers are willing to suppress unbiased results. Just let that sink in and think about the implications of that. This is the state of "the science" we heard about non-stop for the last few years.
And then we are constantly told: "There are no studies that show.........(insert inconvenient truth)"
Now you know why I don't trust the media anymore.
Go to a research university, and you can easily lose a lot of your romantic ideas about science being a dispassionate search for truth. Best case scenario you’re in the hard sciences where the main bias is the pressure to publish results and the fear of losing one’s pet theory, worst case you’re in the “studies” where ideology drives 90% of it.
!!!
Decades not years… the scientific community for the last few decades have been ignoring and suppressing all kinds of different studies and results in almost every field of science! Most celebrity published authors have more than likely lied or tampered with their data (directly or indirectly) in research papers. Really easy to look up and find out about if you take some time to but I’m sure nobody will
This is the case in many fields of "Research". Anyone who presents empirical data about global warming, green energy, or any other narrative driven agenda that does not agree with the agenda is defunded and buried. You saw it happen like crazy during Covid too.
Fun fact about this. Roland Fryer was kicked out of Harvard, and his lab was removed by then-Dean Claudine Gay shortly after he published his findings. Claudine Gay would have the shortest tenure as Harvard's president because she was forced to resign after comments made on antisemitism and plagiarism. Roland Fryer was, without a doubt, targeted and forced out of his institution because of this paper.
that's such a shame. when he said Harvard i grimaced because people like Claudine Gay are making it a less than respectable institution.
There were sexual harassment allegations and he was suspended but not kicked out. He's still faculty at Harvard.
It's an old Marxist tactic. The process is the punishment.
Dang. Well were those allegations used to oust him socially ? Even mentioning "allegations" can ruin someone. I believe this deserves more info than just mentioning that there were these so called allegations. There may be allegations about you. Hmm ? Just sayin
Damn thats literally crazy. How can you be fired for simply posting the truth in facts? Harvard has fallen as an institution of "higher learning" and become a place of brain washing
My late uncle was a police officer in Oakland, CA, USA, in the '70s. Very tall. Very white. Very young. He taught me at a very young age to focus on the content of a person's character. His beat was in one of the poorest neighborhoods. The demographic of his beat was factually made up mostly of one race. He was frustrated that protesters focused on the outsized percentage of that race in his tickets and arrests. He would insist that I use logic and critical thinking. He asked why protesters ignore the outsized percentage of that race as the *VICTIMS* of those criminals. He wasn't targeting anyone based on a race or an income bracket. He was responding to, and dealing with, criminal activity. That race and income bracket just happened to be the outsized percentage of his beat.🤷♀️ The innocent residents and business owners in his beat thought that he was wonderful.
This reminds me of a stat that was being used against the Toronto police. It was pointed out that 86% of random stops in this one community were black people. Turns out well over 90% of the community was black. Proportionately, you were actually less likely to be stopped if you were black. That got completely ignored, though.
@@LadyVineXIII It always will be ignored because it doesn't fit the Left Woke Narrative.
That gets proven when the more affluent areas have a less arrest. That's the point that police see an easier arrest and conviction with black people over white people. Lawyers cost 30k and you have to show up to court. Cops don't like that because they can lose pay over it. @@LadyVineXIII
beatdown?
@@wegfarir1963 Police were assigned to a beat that they were to patrol on foot, on motorcycles, and in their squad cars. My uncle's beat, that he patrolled alone, was larger geographically than a small city nearby that used at least three officers to patrol during the same time of day. He used to snicker at that. I have no idea how Oakland schedules their patrols now.
The whole 'facts shouldn't be controversial' part of this shouldn't be underestimated. Its the biggest issue we have in the current climate and prevents the truth being told, no matter how uncomfortable it is.
I think it's reasonable to doubt the "facts" and "truth" when they contradict what you thought was previously established. The scientific research must be a subject to critical thinking as well. What's important is that you're able to verify the truth and change your mind when necessary.
"controversial" = "I don't like what you're saying"
They've changed the definition of so many words recently, why not one more lol
I mean yeah that's kind of what controversial has always meant.
@@noodles7157 but people throw the word around these days so they can look smarter than what they really are......
Reporting on data is not controversial. He asked if it could be called interesting instead of controversial because it is interesting. Facts are not controversial, they are what they are regardless of everything.
Facts are controversial if enough people don't like them. It sucks, but it seems to be what's happening @@citywinesspirits6583
so he found the truth, told it, and stood by it...wow, isn't that what is supposed to happen in life?
Not if you value comfort.
There's a reason they call it a "harsh truth" or "inconvenient truth".
Problem is young people value a soft comfortable life more than truth.
Evil hates truth. And our society has been on a moral decline for a while so the backlash is not at all surprising. The government new it had to break up the family and discourage religion.
@@rammsteinrulz16doesn’t one group relentlessly push “difficult conversations” about race?
@@Weshopwizard yes, activists.
Unfortunately they're not willing to actually HAVE the real conversations which is why they're "conversations". They push agendas, not conversations.
@@rammsteinrulz16I'm glad I read your response before commenting. You literally took the words out of my mouth. 👍
FOR ANYONE CURIOUS: His name is Roland Fryer, he's an Economist.
Thank you. I was scanning the comments looking for his name so I could look up his research.
Very important!‼️‼️‼️
The Roland Freyer who serial plagiarist, and ex-disgraced Harvard president, Claudine Gay, tried to railroad out of his tenured position at Harvard.
Thanks
No its not he is an economist that could have just look up police payouts and the race of them. And that would have changed the process. But he went to police departments and didn't do numbers if officers just a shitty report. @@kenyafromcali
It's so insane that researchers are afraid to publish actual results because of fear. But I do understand them. It takes a strong person to ignore public/popular opinion and still go through and publish the result.
Science has become just as hyper-politicized aseverything else in this world, when you will not publish factual research for fear of political backlash, you are not a researcher, and most scientists today are bought and paid for by big corporations to look like theyre doing something. If we had real, uncorruptable researchers coming together en masse, we wouldnt need fossil fuels anymore. Nikola Tesla was building the bones for that breakthrough of limitless free energy in the 1920s, until JP Morgan( yknow, like the JP Morgan Chase Bank) decided because you couldnt put a meter on it and make money, that he wasnt going to allow it to come to fruition.
Point im trying to make is: Corpos= evil and corpos have their fingers in EVERY pie.
Yea but when life puts you in front of a choice you either become strong or you become corrupt
As a white woman In the early 2000’s I was in my 30’s and decided to go to college and took criminal justice classes and one of the required classes was on race. It was then my eyes were opened to an agenda being pushed, that made black people feel like victims and white people feel like racists and that we were all awful people. Thankfully, I wasn’t young and impressionable, but I felt awful for both the black students who were made to feel like victims and for the white students, who were made to think it was their fault. The class was led by a black teacher, and I would continually counter the “evidence” the curriculum was trying to shove down our throats. Surprisingly, she actually liked me 😂 But It truly is an agenda from way above even the college level, I believe, to bring race wars to this country and to tear us apart from the inside!
Btw, I have watched several of your videos and love your take!
Dianne
And that’s why government started pushing college so hard! Bringing back racism is a great way to divide and conquer. So sad.
It would never be a fair fight if only 13% of the population is black, and not all of that 13% believes in the victim mentality. The race hustlers like Al Sharpton, Roland Martin and politicians like Maxine Watters and Cory Booker have tried their best to push the division, but it isn't working. Thanks to this Harvard professor and young scholars like JoJo, the info to empower the black community is out there, if they'll just open their minds to it.
I was a non-traditional student too. It's hard to sit through the P.C. indoctrination when you've had some real-life experience.
@@AcmeRacing It's interesting to hear both of you say this. I was only 22 when I went and nonetheless I was so much less impressionable than the students who had gone straight from high school and were still in that mindset of the professor is an authority figure instead of just another adult who might not even be that competent.
Lol who is behind it? Well i can tell you they aren’t white and they aren’t black.
As a white person - I cannot complain about anything without being labeled 'racist'.
Thank you so much to these honest people - saying things that I'm simply _not allowed_ to.
Why do you care about how people that hate you call you? "Racist" sadly doesn't mean anything anymore these days anyways.. Stand your ground and speak up for yourself, otherwise it'll get worse and worse. This stuff needs to end, and it'll only end by speaking up against it and complaining.
You are complaining right now. Are you unable to say anything useful without being racist?
@@trime1015 He means they wont listen, and his shit online will get banned.
He can stand up for whatever, but on the baseless accusation of racism, they will gaslight themselves out of listening to a word he says whether he speak up or not.
I speak up all the time on video games with proximity chat lol. Tell people anything true, your muted or banned in 30 seconds. In person they will just shout over you and stick their fingers in their ears and go "lalalala" like actual children.
USA is a very complex country, on one hand this woke parade of lies is harming minorities.
On the other hand, the racists are strong enough to not be afraid to talk and act.
Is like a paradox, so is hard to navigate.
I met this white guy who came from a poor family, abd yarayara he isn’t the priviliged white guy blacks make up stories at all… he was indeed and factually silenced by minorities and not given the benefits of this woke lie of white supremacy.
But my my, did he believe that black women were manly “by nature” ? He did. Did he believe black men were more agressive by racial genes? He did.
And I as a latina, talking to him felt like enabling his excuses because while is true he didn’t carry this benefits for being white, he was the guy being pushed down for being white, but he was also lowkey racists.
He once made fun of a Native American name of a plase i shared, and scoffed and said “that sound black”… and i was no it isn’t and even if it was why would you react like that?
He also told me that latinas are beautiful and the epitome of femenity… only those who are not black.
Boy, did I love to show him all my black looking relatives so he could get the memo.
So yeah, complain… but still keep yourself in check.
Im not twlling you you are racist. But in my opinion, racism is so common in USA, you guys don’t even notice it when you breath it, sleep with it, speak with it. Any race.
@@trime1015 Because it's the government, your own country saying it everyday non-stop. Look at Canada they are making it illegal for Christians to pray. We are not on the right path. That is not freedom. Soon it'll be illegal to have different opinions to the government.
I worked with a black kid at a restaurant in a small town. He was a straight A student, he knew how to study, and knew what he wanted in life and how to achieve it. The problem was his immediate family, who lambasted him for "acting white" since he was articulate and didn't speak in the pidgin English people call "ebonics". He was terrified that his family would "take his black card" for not liking Macaroni and Cheese lol.
Macaroni and cheese is universal, though. 😋
Macaroni and cheese love is universal. 😋
My husband took a grad level class on inequality, and she highlighted a black researcher from the 90’s who said that what we have isn’t a racial inequality problem, but a class problem, and the professor dismissed this researcher as “brainwashed by white supremacy”
Which is the real dynamic that's been going on for generations, the trustfund/knows-a-legislator class has rigged the economy against anyone who works for a living. That these classist policies make it harder for families to break into the higher class, and that happens to includes a lot of minorities, is just icing on the cake for some of the 'elite'.
What are things that never happened, Alex...
I’m sorry her professor was too brainwashed to consider an alternative theory. Disgusting.
I would really like this prof to talk to some of my friends who legally emigrated here from Africa. They are all excelling. They come over and work 2-3 jobs. They don’t accept any governmental assistance for anything. They work through school and become highly paid professionals……they all say that this “white privilege” theory is 150% bull s&*t. They say that African Americans who revel in victimhood as a way to excuse their lack of excellence….are just embarrassing themselves and a few generations down the line their descendants will be embarrassed by them.
Also, those problems aren’t mutually exclusive. Two things can be true at the same time.
So is your position black people are poor because they are black? Because that's insane because theirs plenty that aren't poor and personally that's a crazy racists position you have there. @matthewgilbert9881
In my high school in Connecticut during the early 90s, all black and white students hung together!
This is why the race issue of today confuses and annoys me!!
I grew up without race issues and only saw people by character, color was not even in my thought process!!
Probably not any more, unfortunately. Thanks to the radical left's efforts to divide everyone..
White vs black, men vs women, straight vs LGTBQ, etc. etc..
This is 100 percent my experience as well in my school during the 90's. My group of friends were a mixture of black, latino, asian and white. We listened to hip hop (tribe, phacyde, de la soul, outkast...) while playing basketball everyday before and after school.
I brought up my son in a very mixed city in the 90's. He was 1 of 2 white kids to make the football team. His friends were a a mix of white, black and brown. They all hung together and he's still friends with the same kids he grew up with. They used to joke around with eachother and no one got offended. He and his friends hate the race division going on today.
It wasn't just like that in Connecticut, the whole country was that way. 80s kids grew up watching the Cosby's and didn't even hardly notice what color the family even was. It honestly didn't even matter to people. In high school, looking back, I was friends with black, white, Hispanic, Hmong, and Native Americans. We never thought to even ask 'what are you '? It honestly mattered least. The first question of a potential friend was, 'what do you like to do', or 'what music do you like?'. If someone seemed fun and cool, that's what mattered. We were taught not to judge a book by the cover. And because lots of kids then were getting into hip hop and rap from all groups, that was cool too.
@@TenPlusFive Platt tech 88
Are we looking at this generation's Thomas Sowell? Refreshing to see an HONEST "liberal" academic who has INTEGRITY. Amazing.
take it one step further. he's very engaging and at some points downright hilarious! I'm liking the cut of this guy's jib
that customer service joke had me hollerin
I thought the exact same thing!
@@user-jg5gt5rg7t I would like to know his name, I'm trying to figure out who he is.
As much as I love the thought of another Thomas Sowell. I'm not sure anyone can reach the bar. The man is a intellectual savant! He is one of very few people who truly looks at both sides with zero bias.
I’ve been a police officer for 14 years. The job is 1000x more difficult than it was when I started over a decade ago. I thoroughly enjoy watching channels like this, and professors like this trying to show a different perspective than the narrative that has been perpetuated for the last several years. Facts, there are bad people in this world, some of those bad people become all sorts of professionals, we see it every day, and some of those professionals happen to be police. I pride myself in being as unbiased as I can be, we all have bias, and one will never escape that, and not all bias is bad (I also have two masters degrees, one in clinical counseling psychology, and one in forensic psychology). My point is, there are bad cops out there, but most are amazing. We genuinely just want to help out the people in our communities. We want to provide for our families and go home at the end of the night. Don’t ever take what some news outlet says as gospel. Do your own research, like this man right here and find out for yourself what is real, and what isn’t. Reality isn’t the same for everyone, and yes, some people have bad experiences with the police, and that’s their reality. It doesn’t necessarily make it reality for someone else. I do this job because someone has to, do we get paid enough? Does anyone truly get paid enough for the work they put it? I am a white man, married to a black woman with a beautiful biracial 4 year old girl, and I always tell anyone who will listen. If the police treat you wrong, get them the right way. If you are doing everything right, then you should never have any issues with the police, but if you do, don’t stoop to their level. You get them where it hurts, their job, and their liberty and freedom. With all of the cameras and video out there now days, these bad apples are being held accountable. I love having a body cam because it’s helped me out on more than one occasion. Do what you’re told, be respectful, and go about your day. In all honesty, if you see a police officer, thank them. You’d be surprised at how that will make their day. Today, we often get a lot of backlash, and we may have thick skin, but it warms my heart when someone thanks me randomly. Be safe out there, and Jojo, keep up the great content. I love your channel.
The biggest issue with policing in the modern day is that the institution itself has become corrupt and predatory, at this point, good cop, bad cop, doesn’t make a difference because all of you are enforcing unjust laws.
It’s why so many cops think nothing of violating someone’s rights, its just part of the job now.
Underrated comment 😭 thank you, God bless you and your family!
Bro, they're called paragraphs.
@@mylesleggette4539 hell of a place to talk about grammar and syntax 🤦🏽♀️ have you seen the internet? Also, I’m a writer and even I break the rules. Put some respect on this man
Most cops in the US just finished highschool, then a VERY short training then were given a gun and let unto the streets.
Not to mention that the US has some of the SHORTEST training periods for a cop internationally speaking.
To become a cop in Europe you have to actually GO TO COP COLLEGE to get yourself some REAL KNOWLEDGE, okay?
You know you're the odd duck out against your own in your profession.
Stop trying to advocate for literal unchecked undiagnosed low functioning sociopaths just because you happen to work with them.
Also cops suffer no consequences in the US for bad behavior a.k.a rape, torture and murder of civilians, be they Black, White, Greys from another dimension.
And nope PAID LEAVE while being "investigated" by their buddy-buddies is and SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN considered a punishment.
I wish my not-state-protected private job would "investigate" me for embezzlement while I am paid A FULL SALARY and sit at home and eat and do what I want and laugh at the people that think "they really gave it" to me.
The maximum "punishment" most cops ever get is being fired(from that police department) and moved to another police department in another area or another state.
My friend grew up with the meanest fists in his neighborhood. Not because he was in a gang. But because people attacked him constantly for being smart, for getting good grades and for being a "race traitor".
He's the only one that left and is successful today. He's also a firm believer of black culture being the most detrimental part of the black community. Man is much smarter than me so when he speaks I listen.
"I don't COVET what THEY COVET", Brilliant answer.
One of my favorite quotes is,
"THe TRUTH is like a LION 🦁, set it free, It needs no defending, It can protect itself".
Not in 2024 it can't, you have to many companies invested/investing in making sure they can exploit you for their own profit. Truth is an obstacle to them, so they have to subvert it, like sleight of hand, look over at these other problems so you don't notice we charge you more, but provide less.
I’m a retired cop from a very large Texas city. This result is consistent with my experience which is the opposite of how it’s dishonestly portrayed by corporate media. The first question we asked when there was a police shooting is what color was the person we shot. We all knew no matter how clean the shoot was, if the person shot was black, the officer was going to get drug through hell.
And who wants to be dragged through hell? i know that I wouldn't. Become vilified in the press, face anger and threats of violence from complete strangers, maybe go through a very public trial, end up losing your job and pension, losing ones family and friends.....what person in their right mind would go looking for that?
The corporate media stance is illogical and I believe that they know it, at least most of them do. They're supporting an agenda that creates news and that's the lifeblood of their industry. "If it bleeds, it leads". Racial tension, that leads to violence, is the perfect "bleeding" story.
That certainly makes sense and I've seen the outcome, in which cops are more reluctant to shoot a black perpetrator than a white perpetrator, referred to as the Ferguson Effect.
Corporate media is the enemy of the people.
Plus if I may, I’d like to think it’s common sense when people really think about it that if a cop or anyone points a gun at you 1st then for the most part. They’re giving your pretty good reasoning for you to fire at them in retaliatory self defence.
I mean is it me or does the so called “Law” that’s ironically unlawful in many other ways, not see self defence as mostly black and white with some shades of grey with a bit of red???
How bad is the “qualified immunity” terror threat out there in the Texas State jurisdiction anyways?? Is it safe to say you guys are inherently anti 2nd amendment also?? given the ironically criminally deplorable nature of said “qualified immunity” sir??
@@queenofprops The Ferguson Effect is simply black race mobs looking for a white to lynch.
Props to the professor for admitting that he was biased--that's really, really hard.
What allowed this man to make the choice to publish the truth, regardless of the consequences, is his high level of integrity.
I wish everyone could be like that.
when i was in school i didn't have black friends, white friends, asian friends, etc, i just had friends. why do we have to divide people by color now?
Because that's exactly what progressives want .
Power and money.
*"why do we have to divide people by color now?"*
Divide and Conquer. A basic tactic that the communist has used with success.
I get what your saying but race is a real thing lmaooo you had black , white , Asian friends.
@@crazybadkid08 didn't use to be. race didn't use to matter, so why does it matter again now? we went from segregating by race, to no more division we're all part of the same group, to segregation again.
At 20:37 the interviewer asks how he made the decision to publish his findings, she says that many (possibly including her) would not have….and there we have the answer to many of society’s ills today: group cowardice but with a righteous loud voice. Bury truth for conformity.
It is multi facetted. Racism is a tool used in 5th generation unlimited warfare ( we will discuss who we are at war with at the end) in order to keep division in society... Black against white. Police against citizen. Export jobs to create unemployment, which creates strife, creating drug additions from depression, homelessness. Other facets are, control media, and companies, to push sexual deviancy like Budweiser and Dillan Mulvaney. Who owns Blackrock and Vanguard? Target, with its gender bending clothing. Soros in buying DA's to let criminals back on the street( damaging safety and increasing police workload and at the same time, plus lowering the criminals fear of the law). Teachers unions have been subverted and teachers teach LGBTQ stuff rather than educate students, which drops the academic standards again creating joblessness and strife, particularly in Democrat cities. There are other facets, but who are we at war with, that's the real question. The WEF wants a one world government and Klaus Schaub is a Rothschild of the Private Central Bank(PCB)0 family. The US constitution is the only thing stopping the bankers from controlling the world because of the 1st and 2nd amendments. Gods in the way with the inalienable rights (1st) and guns in the way( 2nd). No one else has God given rights and constitutional gun rights. The Banksters need God removed so that the Banksters can replace God and guns, well look at Canada , the people don't have a right to protect themselves when a dictator takes over. The Banks plan. Break the Federal Reserve( a division of the PCB) , take over the assets of the loans ( which is the country and people of the USA) dispose of the constitution, and voila, no more God or 2nd amendment. Then now subject to the whims of what the un elected owners of your country are willing to allow you to have in place of the lost Constitutional rights This is not just a Police thing, this is Unrestricted warfare and General Michael Flynn has written a book on this subject to outline in depth how are enemies are dividing and conquering all of our countries. And who owns majority control of control of Pfizer and most other Mega Corporations, why it is the greedy PCB, our true enemy, that always will hunger for more, until they have it all. And the US constitution is standing in the way, but will be thrown out in bankruptcy and the real life Hunger Games will begin. remember, Where We Go 1 We Go All. 17 Worldwide. Love from Canada
It's because if you say anything against the left wing narrative the will do whatever it takes to destroy you. All but the most famous/influential have no hope of surviving. I wish there were a better answer or moreover a solution.
And burying the truth after seeing it is just the tip of the iceberg, most of the time people completely avoid looking at what they shouldn't see. In this case, he did this study because he expected to find a "non-controversial" result. Otherwise, he might not have wanted to do it, or anyway he wouldn't have received any funding.
I'm a retired cop. When I was working as a patrolman, in the 70-80s, I was paid just enough to keep me from filing for food stamps.
A similar thing happened in the UK recently. The government did an investigation into 'institutional racism'.
The conclusions in the report were that economic conditions had a much better correlation to poor life outcomes than race, and in fact so did geography, there being a correlation between poverty and where you live. If you came from a poor area then you would suffer poor life outcomes no matter your race.
Now the next question would have been 'why are areas deprived and how can we fix that', but that couldn't even be thought about due to the $#!! storm that followed due to the report coming up with the 'wrong' answers.
They're deprived areas are deprived because of racist programs that created this system. Check out redlining and other policies.
People tried to tell all the people rioting about police brutality not being what they believed and no one listened! People like this man won’t be heard in the national media or schools where it needs to be heard and taught.
The fact that this paper was done in 2016 and we still had all the riots in 2020 is infuriating.
Four years is a "blink in time". Change has never been instant. We are all having a big conversation that never ends. Focus on what your goals are and don't get distracted by momentary failures.
If it doesn't boost the narrative it is suppressed
To be fair, you have to keep in mind that the riots came during covid, when tensions were already increasing for the simple fact that the pandemic was making life harder for almost everyone, and the catalyst (aka George Floyd's death) DID happen, and in fact could be categorized as the first kind of police interaction with criminals (interaction without shootings), the one where the researcher himself states that there IS some racial bias present in police behaviour
@@temporaneo617 Since the debate is about truth: Government "counter measures" made the so called pandemic a difficult time. Nothing else.
Being intellectually honest is the most important element to progress…
This Professor reminds me of Thomas Sowell who I have so much respect for. Keep speaking the facts, Professor. Good for you for your courage and determination and hard work to educate the public about facts and the truth.
I applaud the Researcher, he wasn't swayed by 'Academic OPINION' to push propaganda, and instead published Truth (FACTS!!).
Power to this man for branching out to a group of people he didn't like for the sake of truth. I was a cop for 20 years and I found it impossible to explain to people how difficult of a job it is. Not only is it difficult it forces you to be jaded on humanity. You deal with so many bad people that your view gets warped to treat everyone with caution. I wish it weren't the case, but alas.
I have never been a cop and I have such a jaded, cynical and negative view of people. I'm not sure I even want to imagine what you went through.
Well said
You the 1st cop I actually read there comment. you can see pure truth in your word and I do appreciate them and your 20 years of service.
I feel more and more blessed all the time to have spent my formative years in a _very_ diverse (racially and economically), completely integrated (in name _and_ in practice) area of the Deep South. I was in an interracial relationship for most of my teen years, and the only time we ever got a sideways look or a rude comment was during a school trip to NYC.
I'm also glad that integrated didn't mean we didn't all have cool things from our heritage that we shared with one another. It just meant that different heritages didn't mean we were in different communities.
Dude, you've got some serious cajones for this one. Big ups
The self-effacing nature of this man! The way he acknowledges his own bias, his own prejudices, and then subsequently calls HIMSELF out is so refreshing. This man is a true academic! He has an answer he wants, but he does not call foul when the evidence does not match up to his preconceptions. Testing research to prove an answer is not wrong - it is how we confirm that what we are seeing is true. It's when we turn our back on facts to perpetuate the preconceived notions that breaks the logic. Thank you, sir, for your dedication to truth. And thank you LFR JoJo for posting this video so that his message - and your own - is shared with even more viewers!
He is walking in the shoes of Thomas Sowell.
The problem with those trying to fix things through lies, is that they can't recognize problems or solutions.
Thank you for introducing me to this economist, his research, and for your thoughtful insight.
Unfortunately, people believe what they want despite evidence to the contrary. As a 65 year old white guy who grew up during the civil rights era I thought we would be so much further along by now. Do I understand what it means to be black, no, of course not. But, I want to see us all as "Americans" first. Why do people seek to divide us instead of unite us?
I graduated high school in 2003 from a half white half black school racism was never a issue or even a topic of conversation we never thought about it and got along just fine we were further along like you said this problem has been manufactured by the people that are really running the country
Exactly. It suits their agenda to have the population divided. Imagine what we could get done if we got along?@@travistaylor4342
you do understand what it means to be black.
It means your skin is darker and you likely have less vitamin D. That's about it
I thought you said Civil War era and I had to read it 4 times before I realized what you said.
Idk maybe the facts there is still a ton of systemic racism and ppl who are racist but are secret about it
"how is a researcher, controversial" I love the question! so bloody good. literally just observing data and recording :P so good
What a brave man! His students are lucky to have him.
Thank you to the channel for this.
I would love to see you finish the video! I think your perspective is very clarifying and interesting.
15:10 I'm a woman who bumped up against this in the worst way back in the late 80's. I had a bad experience and ended up at the hospital and a particular type of "crisis" center. The 'counseling' was in group format and what I saw in these groups confused and horrified me. There was a serious intent to make victims feel like... victims. I was was looking for empowerment so I could rise above my experience, be smarter, be stronger, and live life NOT as a victim. Oh, they did NOT like that.
The story is long so I'll spare readers the details, but I had a revelation that I was excited to share with the group. Yes, the criminal was wrong. Not denying that. But there were so many small mistakes (and a few big ones) that I realized would've spared me the whole experience. I was naive and, in retrospect, I could've avoided trouble. Lessons learned. I don't have to live my life in fear if I walk in wisdom. I didn't have to be a victim. I was going to grow and be okay.
When I shared this in group - I am not exaggerating this one bit - the counselors locked the door and rearranged the chairs in a circle with me in the center. They had the other women scream at me with all their force, "It's not your fault!" This wasn't done in a spirit of compassion. This was an extended rage session that I wasn't permitted to leave. After about twenty minutes things were beginning to get physical. The women were so worked up that they'd escalated to shaking and shoving me. The only way out was for me to lie and agree with them. Even then, it took time for me to get them to stop. The counselors made me repeat multiple phrases over and over again and insisted that I scream them at the top of my lungs.
When I got out of there I can honestly say that I felt as violated as I did from the incident itself. But it was different in one respect. The man only violated my body. These women tried to violate my mind and soul. (And their assault went on much longer.)
Other things I'd witnessed that had bothered me moved to the front of my thoughts. I wasn't seeing good results. I was watching the 'counseling' guide victims into nervous breakdowns. Sessions where women fantasized about torturing their assaulters were numerous. Low level criminal activity (putting sugar in their assaulters gas tank type-things) were almost encouraged. When charges weren't pressed against an assaulter, plans were concocted for other women to entrap them. I know that one of those plans were almost made reality, but I don't think anyone went through with it. Women went in strong and angry and came out weak, bitter, obsessed, and broken. One woman actually ended up attempting suicide and another was hospitalized for a suicide watch. Man hating was absolutely where everyone was being led. Every man was a potential criminal and the were born with their primary 'weapon' between their legs. Real sick stuff.
The next day I snapped and went to our town's mental health center. See, I doubted myself. Who am I to go against the 'experts'? These counselors were trained and had years of experience. Maybe I'm missing something. I was given a wonderful counselor and he told me that they spend WAY too much time patching together women who went through that rape crisis center. Found out that they weren't trained at all. They were nothing more than a nest of bitter feminists who'd hung a sign on their door.
My doubts and rejection of their philosophies were validated and, through the counseling itself, I learned a LOT about radical feminism. This is the philosophy that tried to break me and it was essential that I understand it. The counselor never said it, but in my mind this was a cult. Yes, I hit the library and learned *a lot* about cults and the techniques and foundational beliefs are no different, as far as I could tell. The purpose of the cult is to cultivate dependency on the cult and to rob the individual of their own strength, thoughts, and independent power. Anyone who expresses independent thought - or even asks the 'wrong' questions - is treated like an enemy and violently put back in their place.
I have enough to say about this subject that could fill a book, so I'll stop here; but it's essential to understand these things about the left. I haven't found one aspect of leftist ideology that doesn't fit the same bill. I've seen this plenty on the religious right, so don't think 'my side' is immune. These are very human patterns and the better we understand them, the more resilient we are against them.
Keep an open mind, but don't let your brains fall out. Be suspicious of ANY ideology that tells you that you are the problem and that you are powerless without them.
Can you list some of the books you read about cults / ideologies? I’m very interested in this subject.
That is nuts. I did years of DV counseling and group therapy and never did it become anything close to that. If this is still going on, the organization needs to be reported, especially if they are getting tax dollars.
That's scary. I saw my brother get shot in a burglary and the first thing we did was break down what happened and what we could have done better. IMO that is what you should do. I'm glad you escaped that shit.
Now for the controversial part of my comment. Feminism as a movement is steeped in Marxist philosophy which means the oppressed/oppressor narrative is central. In order to maintain that view they have to convince themselves that innocent men are inherently violent and that they are constantly being victimized. This world view is very damaging to both sides.
What a horrible experience! It sounds like a communist struggle session.
I am glad you found real counselors eventually.
Thank you for your comment. It was very informative.
Maybe you should really write a book about it, if you want it. I think it might be an important book.
@@AliciaGuitar one great way to shut that down would be to claim sexual assault. they were physically touching her and it was unwanted contact. open and shut case right there. Of course people would claim women aren't capable of doing that, much less a center for victims, but hey, they did EXACTLY what the definition of assault is.
It’s a sad thing indeed that just being honest and not a coward is such a high bar in academia and the workplace that those few people that display these basic traits are now considered Brave.
What a shameful society we’re manifesting.
Wow! Man, what a great video. I found your channel through your father's channel, watched a video & subbed instantly. You're looking at things that aren't easy or comfortable, necessarily & I applaud you for it. Truth, facts & reality are invaluable and you're willing to look into & discuss things that so many people refuse to. 👍
This is so good, the interviewer, the professor, and your commentary. I was saying in my head "how is a researcher controversial" just a moment before you paused with the same observation.
The guy needed armed protection for telling a truth that someone wanted covered up.
A general rule of thumb... "Follow the money".
Research results showing some type of inequity/controversy/panic inducing finding always generate attention. Those studies are used by special interest groups (or those disguised as such), universities, etc. to panhandle for funding for additional research, which typically back up the original findings to get more funding for special educational programs/restructurings/social programs to "correct" the perceived issue. You also get private companies that sprout up to sell some type of training or advisory contracts to companies and governments on the issue. An entire economic system gets built upon the issue.
On the other hand, if research shows a perceived issue doesn't actually exist, there's nothing for anyone to spend any money on. This is why the backlash is so severe. The longer it goes on, the more people there are who's livelihoods, incomes and reputations are completely reliant on these "findings". Instead of actually considering the results, they'd rather just silence the opposition and get back to work. And remember... Statistics can easily be manipulated to support whatever narrative you want to push.
Follow the money!?
Oy Vey! Antisemite over here!
It's brave of you to react to this interview and be candid. Thank you for this, and I hope your recognized as being exceptional.
Mad respect. Many would bend the results to get the answer they expect. He did not. Acepting results that go against your narative is hard for any person. Its a fault many scientist fail at.
Very true. He did say he was a data nerd. Data nerds are honest because they prioritize the data.
Brave man. He is a truth seeker, as academics are supposed to be. He wouldn't compromise the truth, despite the cost. Hats off, world needs many more like you.
Researchers can be controversial by posting bad data. It's really common for research papers to have cherry picked, insufficient, or sometimes outright falsified data and still get peer reviewed. Very few papers can stand up to close scrutiny. This guy is exceptional in that he listened to the data that he dug up.
.. Racism is a tool used in 5th generation unlimited warfare ( we will discuss who we are at war with at the end) in order to keep division in society... Black against white. Police against citizen. Export jobs to create unemployment, which creates strife, creating drug additions from depression, homelessness. Other facets are, control media, and companies, to push sexual deviancy like Budweiser and Dillan Mulvaney. Who owns Blackrock and Vanguard? Target, with its gender bending clothing. Soros in buying DA's to let criminals back on the street( damaging safety and increasing police workload and at the same time, plus lowering the criminals fear of the law). Teachers unions have been subverted and teachers teach LGBTQ stuff rather than educate students, which drops the academic standards again creating joblessness and strife, particularly in Democrat cities. There are other facets, but who are we at war with, that's the real question. The WEF wants a one world government and Klaus Schaub is a Rothschild of the Private Central Bank(PCB)0 family. The US constitution is the only thing stopping the bankers from controlling the world because of the 1st and 2nd amendments. Gods in the way with the inalienable rights (1st) and guns in the way( 2nd). No one else has God given rights and constitutional gun rights. The Banksters need God removed so that the Banksters can replace God and guns, well look at Canada , the people don't have a right to protect themselves when a dictator takes over. The Banks plan. Break the Federal Reserve( a division of the PCB) , take over the assets of the loans ( which is the country and people of the USA) dispose of the constitution, and voila, no more God or 2nd amendment. Then now subject to the whims of what the un elected owners of your country are willing to allow you to have in place of the lost Constitutional rights This is not just a Police thing, this is Unrestricted warfare and General Michael Flynn has written a book on this subject to outline in depth how are enemies are dividing and conquering all of our countries. And who owns majority control of control of Pfizer and most other Mega Corporations, why it is the greedy PCB, our true enemy, that always will hunger for more, until they have it all. And the US constitution is standing in the way, but will be thrown out in bankruptcy and the real life Hunger Games will begin. remember, Where We Go 1 We Go All. 17 Worldwide. Love from Canada
Yes but if those bad papers support the correct narrative they will still be praised.
Glad to see LFR growing. Hope you finish this!
Thanks for turning me on to this. Watching the whole interview now.
I really appreciate that you don’t try to pretend like you know everything. Being able to admit to things you don’t know (even something as small as a police officer’s salary) is what makes you a wise person. It shows you aren’t afraid to be yourself and don’t just follow the crowd and repeat the things you hear. I’ve subscribed and look forward to more videos.
I’m a white man, I started working at an iron foundry in ‘94. My dad was an electrician there and I wanted to become skilled trades rather than be production. The foundry was about 80% black and I made lots of friends in production but when I took the test to become skilled trades I got the top score which meant I got first choice at what trade I wanted. I lost over half my friends because of that success and all of those friends were black. Some took the test too and failed. I was called a traitor when I was going to school for electrician and while working there as an apprentice and journeyman. I never really understood that but seeing stuff like this makes me understand better
"Opression" is the term weak black people use to refer to the harsh consequences of their own life choices
Find a better less direct softer way of saying this and it might make it through the automatic defenses in place?
Pretty sure there’s been recent controversies with well known Harvard researchers making up data for papers that further their careers.
In the 80’s and 90’s these things were very common for black people, and forget being black and liking any music other than rap. I had a black friend that loved rock and roll and at my house he would come over to listen to music with me. But he only ever asked me for one favor and I did, he asked me to never tell anyone , period. So I wanted to know why..
He said he’d be disowned completely and would have no friends left. I said you will have one I promise but I got it.
But that really bothered me to know that just one thing can change your life.
And then every one clapped. 😂😂😂😂 I call bull shit.
@@unknowntitan5884
I guess we're at a standoff. We don't know the guy so we can't verify it. How about this for a solution. We believe that it's true but we don't use it as evidence, because it's unverifiable, until we meet the black person who it allegedly happened to, so he can confirm or deny that it ever happened.
I think that's a better solution than calling someone a liar.
@@unknowntitan5884
Are you really going to pretend that these type of things aren't common?
When in the black community you're outcasted or labeled corny, nerd, lame for speaking properly, doing your homework, having hobbies that doesn't revolve around sports or rap, playing instrument or drawing aka "acting white/speaking white"
"If you haven't figured out who to vote for, you ain't black". Social forces are very strong and it takes courage and self confidence to break out. hopefully this is changing with people like Larry Elder, Candace Owens and ABL (Anthony Brian Logan) being articulate, intelligent and entertaining or worth listening to.
Jojo, this is the first video of yours that I've seen. I thank the algorithm for this encounter. I really like your energy, curiosity and geekiness tbh. Looking forward to more.
Man, thank you. Stay Blessed.
The man is a true researcher, or "Data Nerd" as he put it. It's a mindset that is sadly becoming less and less appreciated by academics as the education system seeks to become more political and less professional.
@Jojo, I commend you for keeping up with your family's tradition to keep an open mind and review pretty much anything. It's a great way to learn about things that you never would have thought of on your own. Albert Einstein has a quote that ends with the mantra, "Always maintain holy curiosity."
The problem isn't that researchers put out a narrative, it's that data often conflicts with the narratives people already have
Exactly they cannot handle finding out their beliefs are in fact wrong to the extent you would think if you found out something you thought true was found to be false then you would stop having that belief you know "grow" but no they double down it's the craziest most psychotic thing I have ever seen.
that depends, there are a LOT of bs "research" that set out to find x, and no matter what data they get that goes against it, they will do anything in their ability to make the data fit their pre-established conclusion. Be it by sample size, statistics fuckery or other methods.
There is a LOT of both money and political power invested in multiple narratives and stagnation, or for a certain direction of research NOT to be researched, be it due to interest of money and/or power.
Take the lgbt+ agenda, it is now a multi billion dollar industry making sure their investments don't fall, same with race baiting, and the current anti Anglo agenda all over the place. It all comes down to money and power investments.
tldr; all of life and it's happenings, comes down to logistics and how to control or manipulate it
Yes please. Do continue with the rest of the video. This is the first time I'm hearing of this and I'd like to hear more. I think it's good to be open to many perspectives
Thanks for this!!
These kinds of papers do get published in various ways. Either in peoples books or through various groups. But they are mostly buried or ignored and not talked about. This is not actually a new thing. it's just getting more exposure than it ever has before.
It’s controversial because there’s a particular narrative (lie) being pushed and the truth is against that and all he was doing was sharing the FACTUAL truth.
Another great video man! Your reactions are great! 😂 In this day and age im so glad there are still young people who can rationalize.
my man...i have seen a few of your reaction videos. i dont know much about you but your thoughtfulness is refreshing. you are going to be very important to our nation if you continue on your track. hoping you don't let your successful channel slow you down on your pursuit of greatness. new subscriber
Thank you so much Jojo for showing this. It's popped up in my feed before but I knew I would enjoy your reaction and opinion. I truly appreciate this professor. He needs to be protected at all costs and it breaks my heart that he has received so much vitriol for speaking truth through his hard work, time, writings and studies. I look forward to seeing more from him and can only pray that young people, of all colors, will listen and learn from his wisdom.
Anytime you see something that doesn't make sense and media is pushing it, ask yourself who stands to make money off of it? Politicians? Special interest groups? Non-profits? After they get that money where does it go?
A student of mine had an absolute panic attack when he was going to be tapped for Honor Society - it would destroy his image and he'd lose his friends. Sad.
Thank you for your opinion and your video! I haven't had good "customer service" from them either.... But showing respect gives respect in return.
Your videos are getting better in my opinion. Covering content better etc. Much appreciated keep it up!!
The police are under NO OBLIGATION TO PROTECT!
SCOTUS is VERY CLEAR on this point.
If they don’t have an obligation to stop an active shooter in a high school, they have no obligation to protect your family.
I see you wear a tinfoil hat.
@@Youre-WelcomeOP is correct. "This principle was established in the landmark case Warren v. District of Columbia, where the court ruled that the police do not have a constitutional duty to protect individual citizens from harm. The Supreme Court has ruled that under no circumstances are the police obligated to help you."
@notmoose8670 To be fair, SC had to say that. Otherwise, every time a family member dies when an officer is around, the family can sue the PD. It would set a terrible precedent if they ruled that way. Most officers do protect and serve, but no, they are not obligated to do as such.
@@danielbridges3730 And this is why arming oneself is important. You're always your own last line of defense.
People took the whole "I think therefore I am." And added right to the end. 😑 props to the researchers that post the data regardless of if they agree with it!
You are awesome!! Keep telling the truth!!
MY GOD!!! You are so wise beyond your years!!! I hope college students have as much critical thinking as you! If so, the future is bright!!!
63k is national average for police officer, I was Military Police and hated it so much I reclassified to Intelligence, several Police Departments offered me a position when I finished my 2 enlistment, I just told them I do not have the mental attitude anymore.
I had my mom spend thousands to try and get me a good education. I got friggin liquidified with how much shit got into my head, most I didn't even use nowadays.
I grinded my head like no other, I have absolutely no social life now, I can't even talk properly to people, all that comes out is too technical for casual talking.
I've spent years of my life to reach a dead-end job. What a blessing, right? Whoever thinks that anyone have it easy due to appearances never had to actually work hard to get stuff.
Thank you very much...
You are absolutely correct about people self segregating based on race when they enter a room. People will move towards those they think they have something on common with. It can take weeks for the group to start to blend. With everything, there are a few exceptions to the rule.
Grew up in a mixed community. Friend group was always mixed. My best friend in elementary school was black. Always at each other’s houses, going places with either his mom or my dad and I saw firsthand how he got treated by others from “his community” for being honor roll. Before I even hit puberty this was the case. Also, unrelated by the first experience of some race related shit was with him and his cousin. Had to be around 10 or 11 and we were heading back to our next neighborhood when, what I now know was some militant black dude stopped his car, hopped out and started talking shit about how I was the enemy and they shouldn’t be hanging around me 😂. Outside of that and a few other instances of kids hurling slurs (both ways) and fighting the racial thing was something we were aware of but it was something we didn’t really care about. What chance we had for all that to die out was lost with my generation because it was such a non issue with us. When identity politics started really gaining traction in the late 2010’s we lost the ability to actually talk about it a sane manner and find common ground. That was a different world it seems. Born in 88 for timeline reference.
i worked in a baltimore city school and the kids were pretty adamant about it being lame to do well in school or try. The kids took to me as i was just a tutor and not an authority figure really so i got a lot of kids to realize it felt good to do well. Hopefully that stuck with them
Your auch a bright young man, im oroud ofnyou for being a seeker of truth and learning, and grateful you share your journey with us
As someone who's been at university for almost a decade, the sad part is I find myself avoiding interaction with black people because I feel like I have to walk on egg shells as I could get screwed if they perceive our interaction as bad
A new generation to continue the work of Thomas Sowell.
A comforting thought.
Excellent video and excellent analysis
Just found your videos. Love your information and content!
In today’s universities, we never undertake research if the resulting conclusions might hurt anyone’s feelings OR if the results disprove the cultural narrative. If we accidentally do the research and it does either of these things, we refuse to publish the results. This is referred to as the feminization of higher education.
Let's remember that Gay, the ex-Harvard dean tried to have him fired over false allegations of "improprieties". That's how evil she is - and she still has her job as professor with a $900K salary. These are the corrupt people society has to get rid of or there will never be any progress. I would totally support it if Fryer got Gay's job. He demonstrated his intellectual honesty and that's worth more than anything else.
This is accurate. My history teacher in high school told us this exact thing back in 2000.
I would love to see more of this interview
The first time I was pulled over, I had a gun pulled on me for opening my door instead of rolling down my window(window was broken , so i made both of my hands visible and announced that the window was broken as I opened the door) I was 18 at the time, clean record(still clean record 💪), and am white. The cop was a black woman.
Had i been abrasive and non-compliant, it would have gotten very ugly very fast, as the cop mentioned to me many times throughout our interaction.
Even with the compliance she attempted to tie me to someone from another city who "matched my profile" who had my exact same middle and last name and same car apparently. She used that as an excuse to search my car, thankfully nothing was planted or found.
Not claiming victim, i just think this example may provide insight for many people who may use similar situations to claim victimhood where they arent victims. Claiming victim where its not warranted takes attention away from people who may actually be victimized and muddies the water of any attempt to come up with realistic data/solutions.
I had a similar experience. Was leaving a football game in hs and apparently my tags expired due to them being from a bonded title. It was my birthday so I got gifted a expensive cigar which was on the dash. I grew up in southern dallas so I rolled the windows down, keys on the dash, lights on and hands on the wheel. Still had the car searched, was asked if I had narcotics and lean, and was charged for tobacco (cigar was never put into evidence). I want to say this tho. The initial cop was the problem with tiny man syndrome. Out of the 4 squad cars that showed up he was the problem. The rest comforted me and offered me water etc. But no one listened because I have “white privilege” and “have no idea”.