HMS Ark Royal 1975 Opération_Buccanneer S2 / F-4 Phamtom II

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 391

  • @jastafan6937
    @jastafan6937 3 роки тому +147

    As an ancient French sailor, flight deck crew member aboard Porte-avions Foch and Clémenceau in the early 90's, i must say that's an amazing footage, very impressive, magnificent Wessex and F4, Buccanneers were so massive!! well done! the Ark royal was a very nice ship not very different than ours, old fashion way..Back in time i usually worked around the Flottille 12F equipped with F8 Crusader, the last gunfighter, amazing aircraft, night ops were pretty scary,..Cheers fron France

    • @jastafan6937
      @jastafan6937 3 роки тому +3

      @Slater Slater I think the French navy was the last operational user ( early 2000's) after Philipines dicomintionned their own F-8, ours F-8E ( FN) recieved special modifications like the angle attack of the deployed wing, leading edges slats in two element, new avionics...glad to have seen these amazing fighters in action on board...

    • @jastafan6937
      @jastafan6937 3 роки тому +7

      @Slater Slater yes the exocet missile/ Super Etendard was a deadly combo, RIP for the crews of the Sheffield destroyer...When i was aboard the Foch and Clémenceau most of the entire air group could fit on the hangar ( aproximatly 30 aircrafts), 2 Alouette III ( aka " PEDRO" escadrille 23S.), 1 or 2 Dauphin chopper ( also " Pedro") same job than your Wessex,
      Super Etendard ( 10 aircrafts flottille 14F, 17F) ( like Buccanneer), few Etendard IV P for recon mission ( P for Photo flottile 16F ), 4 or 5 Bréguet Alizé ( same as Gannet flottille 6F.) AEW mission, and like the Phantoms, F-8E FN for the air superiority missions ( less than 10, Flottille 12F call sign "lascar"), a couple of Super-frelon ( like seaking flottille 33F) and often, 2 super Etendard with air refuelling belly pods. Flottille had the same type of aircraft, escadrille were composed with different aircrafts ( Alouette II/ III, Dauphin).most of the time only few planes were spotted on the flight deck when the 3 hangars were fully load...

    • @cosicave5179
      @cosicave5179 3 роки тому +3

      What a great conversation you two are having! Thanks. I enjoyed your interaction.

    • @davidquak4398
      @davidquak4398 3 роки тому +4

      Super Entendard or Buccanneer, thats a hard choice.

    • @jastafan6937
      @jastafan6937 3 роки тому +1

      @Slater Slater i have some very good mémories about the F-8 at sea, during night ops, full afterburner after cat launch, and that aircraft was magnificent on the glide slope with fully rised wing, full down flaperons, dark smoke at every power management, And what about that amazing front wheelie after every touch down...

  • @rodrollingstone2362
    @rodrollingstone2362 3 роки тому +84

    HMS Ark Royal RO9, was my first ship in my 25 year Naval career. I was on board 1972 to 1973, just one year, but what a year! Trips to Rosyth, Oslo, Gibraltar, Barcelona, Malta and then a 3 month deployment to the Caribbean and the USA where I managed to get a week's leave in Florida. This footage is from two years after I left but nothing has changed, with the mighty Phantoms and Buccaneers in high profile. I worked in the Pay Office with a dozen others but would often spend my leisure time up on the 'Goofing Deck' on the Island amidships watching the take-offs and landings and taking slide pictures. It was known as the 'Jewel in the Crown' of the Royal Navy at the time, and I was sad to see it scrapped. The name ARK ROYAL has been lost, it seems but maybe one day it will emerge again, I do hope so!

    • @NOWThatsRichy
      @NOWThatsRichy 3 роки тому +8

      I've always said that one of our new QE class carriers should have been given the ARK ROYAL title.

    • @sss-og1yl
      @sss-og1yl Рік тому +3

      @@NOWThatsRichy ...and another should be Eagle for sure? :)

    • @SimDeck
      @SimDeck Рік тому +2

      Can you describe a tyical day for yourself. What was your shift pattern and what was the food like?

    • @jjanderson121079
      @jjanderson121079 Рік тому +1

      My Dad was on RO9, he was on its last commission voyage. Just married and was at sea straight afterwards. He was chef and boxing 😂

    • @2TNOIR
      @2TNOIR Місяць тому

      A Royal Navy without Ark Royal isn't a navy at all!

  • @AquilaCrotalusEsox
    @AquilaCrotalusEsox Рік тому +11

    My Yankee heart goes out to you Men for sharing the load of protecting the free world. And y’all make it look really really good!

  • @jamesrae5351
    @jamesrae5351 3 роки тому +48

    I was on board the Ark when they made this video. A very exciting place to be working as a young lad - particularly during recovery stations in rough seas and at night.

    • @frostedbutts4340
      @frostedbutts4340 3 роки тому +4

      That's awesome. Bet those memories will be with you forever.

    • @NJTDover
      @NJTDover 3 роки тому +1

      How old are you, James boy? You must be 75 years old or so, mustn't you?

    • @jamesrae5351
      @jamesrae5351 3 роки тому +4

      @@NJTDover ... 65. The video was made around the mid seventies.

    • @PaveWayMA
      @PaveWayMA 2 роки тому +2

      How were the buccaneers? I’m a big fan of them but couldn’t find any stories from carrier crew.

  • @bjjace1
    @bjjace1 2 роки тому +6

    I absolutely love these old films. What a gift

  • @jimbradshaw4
    @jimbradshaw4 3 роки тому +41

    This is the sort of gem of a film that makes it worthwhile coming to UA-cam. I loved every moment of it, thank you - and who doesn't just love the sight and sound of a busy Aircraft Carrier (especially with Buccaneers!) ?
    Just brilliant.

  • @normann4016
    @normann4016 3 роки тому +18

    I visited HMS Ark Royal in the 2nd half of the 70's ...I was more or less 16/17, impressive shipi, visitors were welcome and guided by Royal Marines.. unforgettable... I am now 63...

  • @nikonmark37814
    @nikonmark37814 6 років тому +90

    I'm an american and sailed along side of her back in 1975 while I was stationed aboard the USS Independence, CV-62. I was on the flight deck and your phantoms landed on our flight deck.

    • @genebohannon8820
      @genebohannon8820 3 роки тому +11

      We.will get Biden's crew uninstalled and you Commonwealth will get right too. Then we can get back to this and space too. Fuck China

    • @jamesbugbee6812
      @jamesbugbee6812 3 роки тому +7

      @@genebohannon8820 No need to fuck China, that is a self-fucking scenario.

    • @andreinarangel6227
      @andreinarangel6227 3 роки тому +3

      My father was stationed in southern Italy. The Indy came to a nearby port (Brindisi) in 76. I went on board.

    • @timj41
      @timj41 3 роки тому +12

      Maybe worry more about Trump’s friend in the Kremlin , he’s the one messing in everyone else’s stuff. No one has stood up to him in the past 4 years

    • @DropdudeJohn
      @DropdudeJohn 3 роки тому +4

      @@timj41
      Maybe you should realise that the old commie agitator Merkle is really Putin's friend, she is slowly making Europe dependent on Russia for energy supply and now setting people up for Sputnik instead of AZ, watch what some former East Germans and eastern Europeans are up to, some of them still long for the old system and are longing to spread throughout the EU

  • @well-blazeredman6187
    @well-blazeredman6187 2 роки тому +14

    I'm always struck by just how short our catapults were. BTW, the full video is a great teaching-aid for anyone wanting to show their little uns something about teamwork.

  • @NJTDover
    @NJTDover 3 роки тому +11

    More than 50 years have passed by since this incredible documentary was shot. Most of the sailors and naval aviators depicted in this film must be 75 years old +/-! Those blokes served their country on a magnificent flattop. Pity that no more money was allocated by the government to build a third QE-class carrier to bear the legendary name HMS Ark Royal.

  • @terrydouglas5008
    @terrydouglas5008 3 роки тому +12

    Always nice to see phantoms. I spent 20 years of my life working on F4C/D/E radars in USAF.

  • @Eagle_the_18th
    @Eagle_the_18th 2 роки тому +14

    Narrator has nearly the same enthusiasim and tone as a sports commentator and I love it

  • @rambler241
    @rambler241 6 років тому +49

    Fast-paced commentary - excellent stuff. They don't make documentaries as good as this anymore.

  • @gigmcsweeney8566
    @gigmcsweeney8566 3 роки тому +6

    A superb film, which really put you on the carrier deck. Great stuff! Incidently, my cousin served onboard HMS Ark Royal as a Master Ship's Diver.

  • @tonybevel5282
    @tonybevel5282 3 роки тому +8

    Was on board during this as a stoker. Happy days! I remember watching these launches and recoveries, what bottle! Also the pilot of SAR 47 who on RAS’s used to throw the Wessex around the sky like a toy. Fantastic

  • @timcasey5835
    @timcasey5835 3 роки тому +6

    Its good to be reminded that the Royal Navy has decades of experience deploying aircraft carriers and their flight wing. I was never in favour of losing our carrier fleet for those years before the Queen Elizabeth class were built and commissioned.

  • @TheDoppelgangster
    @TheDoppelgangster 6 років тому +51

    Love it! Only the Brits could do commentary like that!

    • @SGBlackstar
      @SGBlackstar 3 роки тому +6

      My late great uncle was on this ship at this time RN Engineer

    • @Dreaded88
      @Dreaded88 3 роки тому +1

      @@SGBlackstar :
      Who's most responsible for the giving up of this ship: *Callahan?* , *Heath?* , *Wilson?*

    • @maxbodymass6288
      @maxbodymass6288 3 роки тому +1

      @@Dreaded88 Wilson!! Heath could have stopped it but didn't , Callahan was off to the IMF so could not even as a ex-navy man he would want to.......

  • @1chish
    @1chish 8 років тому +97

    7 years later we could have done with that beauty and her brood ....

    • @mongohotline
      @mongohotline 3 роки тому +11

      Hey, Labour needed the money for.... something.

    • @motormech1h343
      @motormech1h343 3 роки тому +2

      Yep would of love to seen the buccaneer dropping bombs on the argies

    • @1chish
      @1chish 3 роки тому +1

      @@motormech1h343 Coming in at 150 feet above the deck..... "SURPRISE"!

    • @Diverball1
      @Diverball1 3 роки тому +3

      If we'd had her, the Argentinians probably wouldn't have attacked in the first place.

    • @Longs81
      @Longs81 3 роки тому

      @@mongohotline Thatchers government sold her for scrap in 1980 but yeah you blame Labour you muppet.

  • @stevetheduck1425
    @stevetheduck1425 2 роки тому +1

    RAF old man here: worked with many of these Buccaneers when they moved over to us.
    Strike, Maritime Strike and Nuclear Strike, through the times at Red Flag, and into the latter years when so many were grounded 'cos pols wouldn't spring for the remanufacture of some of the spars.
    Never ran out of spare parts due to this though, and our two-seat Hunter trainer for Buccaneer crews lasted another twenty years after the Buccs were retired, even though we had to replace a wing due to a 'firm' landing.
    The film 'Exercise Open Gate' (IIRC) covers the year before I came to Honington. Awesome Vangelis music, too. ;-)

  • @bobstride6838
    @bobstride6838 3 роки тому +6

    Great video. The Buccaneer was a great aircraft

  • @DrLager2000
    @DrLager2000 3 роки тому +4

    FAA Phantoms FGR2s in that blue colour are are finest looking aircraft ever. Its also fun to see Buccaneers having to climb to land on a deck.

  • @ainsleystones4600
    @ainsleystones4600 3 роки тому +4

    I love when the funky wah guitar comes in near the end. It dates the film perfectly!

  • @arnold9526
    @arnold9526 3 роки тому +10

    British ship with British aircraft! I LOVE IT😍😍😍

    • @MikeLacey52
      @MikeLacey52 3 роки тому +3

      The good old British Phantom, eh?

    • @-rp2pg
      @-rp2pg 8 місяців тому +1

      @@MikeLacey52
      Buccaneers aren’t USA and all carrier technology is British apart from daft Nuclear Power that will be disastrous when they see real naval warfare

  • @warrenchambers4819
    @warrenchambers4819 3 роки тому +2

    OMG THOSE GUYS ARE CRAZY! Holy crap that deck is small!!!!! Hats off to ya Britts good Lord.

    • @-rp2pg
      @-rp2pg 8 місяців тому +1

      You were more crazy during the war because you didn’t have armoured decks and that’s why the Japs were smashing into you
      (kamikaze)

  • @georgebuller1914
    @georgebuller1914 3 роки тому +4

    What saddens me, is that its likely that many of the people seen in this video are now either dead or doddery!
    47 years is a long time and if they were in their 30's back then, they will be in their late 70's-early 80's now!
    That said, I hope they all had great service lives and enjoyed their lives after they left the service.
    Thanks for keeping us peasants safe!...xxx

    • @dawnfoster7227
      @dawnfoster7227 3 роки тому

      My dad was CPO flight deck on the Ark mid '70s,he died aged 58 in 1999.He loved the old girl, she was his last ship before he went shorebased.

  • @nanba25
    @nanba25 3 роки тому +4

    This a top quality document, with lots of details about the preparation work to be done prior a plane departs. Never seen that before, well done and thanks for sharing

    • @teacheeli6236
      @teacheeli6236 3 роки тому

      I watched this video in early 70' at Hong Kong television station RTV.

  • @barrybark3995
    @barrybark3995 3 роки тому +3

    went round her on a kids daytrip at Edinburgh in 1977, it was great ,i remember the ship had its own newspaper i picked one up and kept it for years

  • @fishernz
    @fishernz 8 років тому +23

    Love the commentary. RN humour at its best.

    • @dc-4ever201
      @dc-4ever201 3 роки тому

      They sound like horse racing commentators 😁

  • @sgh1963
    @sgh1963 3 роки тому +3

    God bless the Royal Navy. Undefeated since its inception, and all us Brits should be thankful for evermore for that. My father served for 15 years and was a Cold War submariner. It set the standards for all Anglosphere and Commonwealth navies and its traditions and excellence are still alive today, thankfully. Hearts of Oak indeed.

  • @duartesimoes508
    @duartesimoes508 2 роки тому +4

    These were the golden ages. A Royal Navy Britain could justifiably be proud of. Just imagine if the Falklands War had been fought with assets like these. Maybe it would had never taken place, right?

  • @barthoward5397
    @barthoward5397 6 років тому +9

    Fascination view of a time in history.

  • @TannithVQ
    @TannithVQ 3 роки тому +2

    That was wonderful. I'd have been at school at the time, but I loved anything flying or sailing.

  • @anthonyfmoss
    @anthonyfmoss 3 роки тому +19

    You can understand why Maggie was disappointed when she was told the Ark Royal was no longer in service in Spring 82,!

    • @ganlin1
      @ganlin1 3 роки тому +3

      she was scrapped in 1980, the story goes that maggie wanted a ship sent to the falklands, but did not realise it was 3 weeks sailing time

    • @Dreaded88
      @Dreaded88 3 роки тому +1

      Who's most responsible for the giving up of this ship: *Callahan?* , *Heath?* , *Wilson?*

    • @magna4100
      @magna4100 3 роки тому +5

      The bitch would have scrapped it. Just like she was set to get rid of one-third of the UK
      Navy's surface fleet following the 1981 "Defence" Review. She was also intending to
      sell HMS Invincible and her aircraft to the Australians.

    • @Bangjopet
      @Bangjopet 3 роки тому +1

      Im sorry, but who's maggie?

    • @Dreaded88
      @Dreaded88 3 роки тому +1

      @@Bangjopet :
      *Margaret Thatcher*

  • @MB-xr7xx
    @MB-xr7xx 7 років тому +52

    A little carrier with a big punch. Crewed by the best.

  • @jamesbugbee9026
    @jamesbugbee9026 Рік тому +1

    This isn't a training film, it's a recruiting film! I can't resist watching every time it's here available: great tempo, great announcing, the unbeleivable squeeze of giant a/c on a Very Short deck, a classy Gannet, i could go on...
    It would B nice 2 C the new twins snap it up like this old FAA used 2

  • @richardprice7763
    @richardprice7763 7 років тому +72

    seeing what we used to have makes me want to cry......

    • @YARROWS9
      @YARROWS9 6 років тому +9

      John Cameron FFS John.Our American friend wasn't having a dig.He was merely stating a fact.The fleet air Arm boys done a great job landing those jets on our smaller carriers.

    • @Tehgoat
      @Tehgoat 6 років тому +1

      One of the greatest inventions by the Royal Naval Air Arm was the Ramp. Simple and elegant and copied by the Russians and Chinese...
      I wonder why the Americans have not subscribed to it

    • @scrog77
      @scrog77 4 роки тому

      Air frame lasts a lot longer with ramps so its a toss up between catapult and ramp.

    • @mtumeumrani376
      @mtumeumrani376 3 роки тому +4

      @Teh Goat, the ramp affords less than half the payload and weight of the Aircraft than the Catapult. The Ramp has no advantages over the catapult: none.

    • @PenzancePete
      @PenzancePete 3 роки тому

      Right up to the point that the catapult goes u/s. Yes it does happen.

  • @MrSebfrench76
    @MrSebfrench76 6 років тому +3

    Fascinating. As a frenchie , fell really sad for your Navy. A shame.

  • @alexchubbymclynn6060
    @alexchubbymclynn6060 2 роки тому

    Such amazing footage, thank you very much! I do miss those lovely old times...

  • @UriNierer
    @UriNierer 3 роки тому +52

    They should have named the Queen Elizabeth Ark Royal, and the Prince of Wales Eagle.

    • @rubovia
      @rubovia 3 роки тому +6

      Hermes would have more appropriate for Prince of Wales , yes Queen Elizabeth should have been name Ark Royal.

    • @jacktanner4948
      @jacktanner4948 3 роки тому

      Why?

    • @UriNierer
      @UriNierer 3 роки тому +5

      @@jacktanner4948 Because it fits much better. Ark Royal is THE name for british aircraft carriers. QE is a battleship name, now appropriate for a submarine, not for a carrier.

    • @NJTDover
      @NJTDover 3 роки тому +1

      American flattops are named after presidents so the Brits followed the same piece of advice by naming their new carriers after the Queen and her heir. It would've been fantastic to name the new carriers HMS Ark Royal and HMS Victorious since both names represent a magnificent naval heritage in the Royal Navy. It's all politics nowadays.

    • @MikeLacey52
      @MikeLacey52 3 роки тому

      @@UriNierer Queen Elizabeth is also the name of our, err, Queen...

  • @noodles169
    @noodles169 3 роки тому +3

    Amazing how fast they work. All in unison, like a well oiled machine

  • @leontubrok
    @leontubrok 4 місяці тому

    I just love the look of a buccaneer, so many 60s aircraft just look so much better than modern versions, just more curvy i think

  • @garethgriffiths8577
    @garethgriffiths8577 3 роки тому +4

    I got a good tingle in my spine watching this!

  • @mikebryan544
    @mikebryan544 8 місяців тому

    Great film footage. Amazing narration too like listening to a horse race but adds the tension.

  • @johnk1639
    @johnk1639 6 років тому +16

    This was made the year I was born, the Royal Navy really used to be something. Maybe with the introduction of the new Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers it will restore some pride to the RN.

  • @superbike1
    @superbike1 7 років тому +68

    We seem to have gone backwards over the last Forty years.

    • @Charlesputnam-bn9zy
      @Charlesputnam-bn9zy 3 роки тому +4

      The whole West has gone backwards, courtesy of the leftard quislings.
      Someone like Callahan would have licked Galtieri's boots after handing him
      over the Falklands.

    • @Dreaded88
      @Dreaded88 3 роки тому +1

      @@Charlesputnam-bn9zy :
      Who's most responsible for the giving up of this ship: *Callahan?* , *Heath?* , *Wilson?*

    • @mookie2637
      @mookie2637 3 роки тому

      @@Charlesputnam-bn9zy How do you know that? The Labour Party supported Thatcher during the Falklands. I'm no fan, believe me, but Callahan and Healy were decent people.

    • @Charlesputnam-bn9zy
      @Charlesputnam-bn9zy 3 роки тому

      @@mookie2637 decent as individuals, no doubt.
      But moved by their leftist convictions which had always
      been those of the appeasers who view patriotism as warmongering.
      Like (the British Noam Chomsky)Alan John Percival Taylor's
      ''There was nothing wrong with Hitler except he was a German.''
      in his 1968''The Origins Of The Second World War''.

    • @YARROWS9
      @YARROWS9 3 роки тому

      @@Charlesputnam-bn9zy Both served in the second World war. In the Navy and Army. They were also officers.

  • @phillipecook3227
    @phillipecook3227 3 роки тому +1

    If memory's correct a couple of years later she featured in the ITV series "Sailing"?

  • @georgecollie5875
    @georgecollie5875 7 років тому +34

    It just shows you can't have a navy on the cheap..... HMS Ark Royal was the best carrier of her time, cats and traps, with phamtom's and buccanners. We should have had cats and traps on HMS QE's carrier but it will cost us in the end!!!

    • @martinwrigley7673
      @martinwrigley7673 6 років тому +6

      yes ,,,true words...penny wise pound foolish..mod and uk governments

    • @francescopapi3871
      @francescopapi3871 4 роки тому +4

      You would have had F35Cs, E2Ds, even EA18Gs and other british made aircraft (maybe a sea tempest)

    • @barnabyg6808
      @barnabyg6808 3 роки тому +2

      George Collie agreed, but they haven’t ruled out putting an ems system in at a later date

    • @Popesontour
      @Popesontour 3 роки тому

      Man read my comment! I don't know why they built them with no cats? So the only platform that can fly off QE and PoW is the f35. I guess the future is vstol. I don't know? Maybe.

    • @tech4pros1
      @tech4pros1 3 роки тому +2

      Our new carriers have NO airborne early warning or airborne anti submarine capability. Unlike the US, who have the E2 hawkeye (the last thing the fleet air arm had with those sorts of capabilities was the Fairey Gannet)

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 4 роки тому +4

    Awesome.. Thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿

  • @YARROWS9
    @YARROWS9 17 днів тому

    We had the Ark Royal, Eagle, Hermes and Victorious at one time. Thats hundreds of aircraft capabilities at sea. Now we have two massive carriers, with a handfull of planes.

  • @brokensun100
    @brokensun100 2 роки тому +1

    My Late-Cousin was an air frame fitter on the Ark in the late 50's-60's.

  • @douglasb5046
    @douglasb5046 4 місяці тому

    The on deck choreography for a launch is brilliant

  • @East_Performance
    @East_Performance 5 років тому +1

    I.enjoy watching these docu from the old royal navy

  • @Tehgoat
    @Tehgoat 6 років тому +3

    I remember seeing her being scrapped in Lough Ryan..it was a melancholy start to the annual family holiday in Blackpool

    • @robinwells8879
      @robinwells8879 3 роки тому +1

      Me too, coming over on the ferry from Larne for Easter and summer holidays. As they chopped her up she rose out of the water to offer more of herself. What a visitor attraction she would be now but perhaps her destruction was a more fitting end.

  • @michaelsnow7252
    @michaelsnow7252 4 роки тому +4

    Love the voices in this

  • @JDJLalor
    @JDJLalor 7 років тому +4

    Flight deck procedures look pacy enough by day and in fair weather. What must it have been like at night or in poor weather?
    I remember being told that a carrier such as Ark Royal could reckon on losing a man per commission through incidents such as walking into a Gannet's prop disk.

    • @stevenbevis9290
      @stevenbevis9290 2 роки тому

      A flight deck crewman told me one man per month

    • @stevenbevis9290
      @stevenbevis9290 2 роки тому

      A flight deck crewman told me 1 man per month lost . He was R09 74-78 .

  • @AdeBroon
    @AdeBroon Рік тому

    My dad served on the Ark Royal at the same time we believe ❤

  • @silkdestroyer
    @silkdestroyer 6 років тому +5

    I want to join THAT navy. Where do I sign? LG.

  • @Lord.Kiltridge
    @Lord.Kiltridge 3 роки тому +11

    So this kid puts on a captain's hat and says "Yarrrr! I'm a PIRATE!"
    I asked him "Where's your Buccaneers?"
    And he says "On the sides of me Buccan 'ead!"

  • @twittykins
    @twittykins 3 роки тому +1

    Does anyone know who is doing the commentary? The voice reminds me a bit of the actor Patrick Holt.

  • @MrDastardly
    @MrDastardly 5 місяців тому

    Beautiful in every way. 👏👏👏👏

  • @minormajor1
    @minormajor1 6 років тому +7

    One of the pilots (at 5:30) is David Hansom, known as Twiggy. David and I joined Cathay Pacific on the same day, and we did our command courses (on the B747) at the same time, We were both checked (one of many over many months!) by a fellow by the name of Pete de Sousa, ex Fleet Air Arm Scimitars (who was checked out by my Hamble instructor, Roy Noyes). I recall going up to the 4th floor of the CX building around Christmas 1987 with David to sight our check reports (which we had to read and sign off). De Sousa did us proud, we both got reports that glowed in the dark. Sadly, both have now passed away.

    • @harrymyd3294
      @harrymyd3294 6 років тому

      rightangle do you know a guy called Dave Waller, he was an engineer on the ship. He’s my grandfather

    • @minormajor1
      @minormajor1 6 років тому

      Hi Harry, no I'm afraid I don't know him.

    • @lauwai4life
      @lauwai4life 6 років тому

      Did you happen to have know a Phantom driver named Jim Bellamy either in the navy or with Cathay Pacific? He was a cabin mate at Dartmouth, but we lost touch. I understand he too passed away.

    • @minerthree
      @minerthree 3 роки тому

      Would be the same Pete de sousa who flew scimitars off Victorious 58/59

  • @harrymyd3294
    @harrymyd3294 6 років тому +4

    My grandfather worked on that ship, he was an engineer who would fixedThe jets if there was a problem. He was on another ship which I don’t know the name off but there where sea fury’s and sword fish on it with the jets

    • @24934637
      @24934637 3 роки тому +1

      Mine was involved in building her! He fitted the fire fighting systems. Thinking about it, it was probably the previous Ark Royal, not this one, the one that eventually got torpedoed and sank in the Med.

  • @genebohannon8820
    @genebohannon8820 3 роки тому +1

    Nice to see the crazy cool Garnnet.

  • @Gunslinger800
    @Gunslinger800 6 років тому +5

    Makes you wonder if the falklands would have been over that much faster if the RN still had its strike carriers.

    • @richardstout6364
      @richardstout6364 5 років тому +7

      Gunslinger800 don’t think the Falklands would have happened at all if the Ark and Eagle had been retained and replaced by CVA-01 as intended.......

  • @lenfirewood4089
    @lenfirewood4089 2 роки тому +1

    A golden era no doubt - in fact I'd argue there was still a role of Buccaneers - not exactly 5th Gen but with its boundary layer control and ground effect could get in very fast and low and have capacity to deliver some serious ordnance.

    • @HighFlyer6969
      @HighFlyer6969 2 роки тому

      yea and there was a better jet for this role, panavia tornado, we should've kept it in service tbh

  • @importantjohn
    @importantjohn 3 роки тому +2

    UK's new Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers makes the Ark Royal look like a steam boat :)

  • @AbandonEarth911
    @AbandonEarth911 3 роки тому +1

    Solidarity some great team work from the working class.

  • @tyranusfan
    @tyranusfan 7 років тому +2

    What does he say at 19:35? Right before "anti-shipping strike."

  • @dancostello6465
    @dancostello6465 Рік тому

    Anyone recall RoyalNavy Operation Safari in North Sea 1975? Any details on the loss of XV695?

  • @stevenwatsham5973
    @stevenwatsham5973 2 роки тому +1

    I only ever saw her being broken up at cairnryan while I was serving as an AB with Townsend Thoresen ..
    Europic Ferry and the FE 4...

  • @CharlyBaby-77
    @CharlyBaby-77 7 місяців тому

    Love those british carriers. Much more beautiful than the current ones.

  • @888ssss
    @888ssss Рік тому

    My father was on the air arm and flew the Sea Vixen. He wanted me to follow him into the service, but unfortunately I am cross eyed.

  • @davideverett2
    @davideverett2 6 років тому +2

    I was only 9 at the time but I remember the Audacious-class Ark Royal being decommissioned It'd be nice to see an Ark Royal in the Navy's SuperCarrier fleet. I know they only plan on having 2 but a lot can change over the next decade or so. A Nuclear powered Carrier with emals and lasers may be out of the question due to costs but 10 or 20 years down the road when have all our F35's maybe then, It'd be good for the Navy to have the option to field multi-role aircraft like the Typhoon & maybe even a few Gripens if they're smart enough to buy some..

  • @andrewparnell6656
    @andrewparnell6656 4 місяці тому +1

    I must watch Sailor again !

  • @aharvey4990
    @aharvey4990 6 років тому +1

    Another great video ...thanks again! Great info.

  • @MrRugbylane
    @MrRugbylane 5 років тому +3

    Where did it all go wrong UK?

    • @unixnerd23
      @unixnerd23 3 роки тому

      End of the Cold War meant a huge drop in funding. Same time we were seeing a huge jump in costs due to poor procurement and increasing costs of developing aircraft, ships and weapons.

  • @meertenwelleman4600
    @meertenwelleman4600 3 роки тому +1

    Incredible operations!

  • @rivco5008
    @rivco5008 6 років тому +1

    Why were the Buccaneers positioned for launch with their nose wheel raised off the deck?

    • @iatsd
      @iatsd 6 років тому +6

      To give them enough airflow over the wing so they would actually fly at launch.

    • @richardstout6364
      @richardstout6364 5 років тому +2

      The Ark and Eagle were about as small a carrier you could have to operate Bucks and Phantoms. The phantom needed a longer nose wheel than US Versions to increase lift and the Bucanneers were raised to increase lift.

    • @gerdknight1109
      @gerdknight1109 3 роки тому +1

      Also RN Phantoms were hindered by Rolls Royce Spey engines increasing their length by iirc 100mm which necessitated the longer nose wheel or added to the reasons for it. Also, I believe the RN Phantoms were prone to damage on their tail sections due to this modification. The UK government insisted Phantoms were fitted with RR Spey engines for all the obvious reasons none of which were technology based.

  • @gimmarkmark7822
    @gimmarkmark7822 3 роки тому +1

    After searching , I found at Falkland war British scrapped the aircraft carrier for F4 Phantom so that sent one for Harrier instead? Or she thought self defense first to keep F4 not to send?

    • @carreg-hollt
      @carreg-hollt 3 роки тому

      I don't think we had a carrier for Phantoms at that time. Two carriers were involved in the Falklands war: HMS Invincible and the flag, HMS Hermes. Both carried Sea Harriers.
      HMS Ark Royal in this video (pennant no. R09), with a flat deck and two catapults, was an earlier generation and had been decommissioned in 1979, three years before the Falklands war.
      In 1982, a different HMS Ark Royal (R07) with the same ski-jump as HMS Invincible had not long been launched after building but didn't enter service until 1985.

  • @BladeRicsi
    @BladeRicsi 6 років тому +3

    Awsome video, my favorite was the buccaneer launch.

  • @MongooseTacticool
    @MongooseTacticool 5 років тому

    Incredible work all around. Whiplash at 23:00 for that Phantom driver!

  • @jamesbugbee6812
    @jamesbugbee6812 3 роки тому +1

    Could be my favorite video; the building tension, beautiful aircraft (even Gannets, in their own quirky way), intake/exhaust/contraprop anxiety on a very compact deck (FEAR- the bulgy shape of a Buc must be to fair-in the pilot's cojones, but what about deck crew?). Wish we, Ever, could produce film ala Britannia.
    But how could 950' of deck look so small? 💜

    • @stevenbevis9290
      @stevenbevis9290 2 роки тому

      Only 800ft deck . 845ft total inc bow bridle catcher & stern extension !

  • @ianwilliams8385
    @ianwilliams8385 7 років тому +6

    R09 my old ship, before the angled flight deck added, for three yrs - but my work was deep inside rather than on deck. My mess deck was right below one of the catapults.

  • @rccnc4462
    @rccnc4462 6 років тому +1

    far out 7.50 .. love that nose gear and angle of attack .... gold . is it just me or is the usaf f4 nose strut shorter .. why did the brits do it so different ?

    • @MkVII
      @MkVII 6 років тому

      In truth, British carriers, mostly designed in the piston-engined era, were too small for operating modern jet aircraft and this was one of the expedients used to enhance them.

    • @spawnof200
      @spawnof200 6 років тому +3

      a higher angle of attack at take off meant they could get away with a lower take off speed

  • @iainstewart9844
    @iainstewart9844 2 місяці тому

    The Task Group my ship was in met up with Ark Royal's Group in May 1975 after a visiting Brazil.
    I managed to organise a visit to the Ark and was in our Wasp Helo just about to take off when the Flight Crew rushed out to the Wasp and pulled me out and the helo took off immediately. Ark Royal's Search And Rescue Wessex had an engine failure and ditched into the sea. The Wasp returned and l got my flight to the Ark. Because of the accident flying was cancelled so l couldn't see take offs and landings.

  • @martinwrigley7673
    @martinwrigley7673 6 років тому +3

    Thats the last strike carrier we had

  • @RonJohn63
    @RonJohn63 3 роки тому +1

    The Buccaneer's front wheel is off the deck when ready for launch. That's unusual.

    • @stevetheduck1425
      @stevetheduck1425 2 роки тому +1

      The Buccaneer had a tail bumper / skid as well.
      Also the Phantom in British Royal Navy service was built with an extending nose-wheel leg for the same reason. It's in this film.

  • @lawrencew3703
    @lawrencew3703 3 роки тому

    Brilliant love the commentary

  • @xfire7
    @xfire7 3 роки тому

    Thank God we have carriers back .

  • @steviechalmers1218
    @steviechalmers1218 3 роки тому

    That was brilliant to watch 👍

  • @Road38910
    @Road38910 6 років тому +1

    I used to know a couple of "tiffys" on this cruse from 849 B Flight from Lossiemouth.....hels bells, those Gannets were plug-ug aircraft or what?

  • @lresshared2203
    @lresshared2203 3 роки тому

    has it ever visited Singapore ?

  • @markscott554
    @markscott554 3 роки тому

    Great narrator: Gannet, Buccanneer, Phantom! They think it's all over. It is now!

  • @taxus750
    @taxus750 Рік тому

    Gannets, Buccaneers and Phantoms (with the able assistance of Sea Kings and Wessexes) - this was the Royal Navy's air force. It boggles the mind to think what's become of that.

  • @sinogarcon
    @sinogarcon 3 роки тому +1

    Was this the mission that it was despatched to the Caribbeans to ward off Honduras's attempt to overrun Belize?

    • @carreg-hollt
      @carreg-hollt 3 роки тому

      1972, despatched to the Caribbean to protect Belize from Guatemala.
      Belize was called British Honduras back then.

    • @sinogarcon
      @sinogarcon 3 роки тому

      @@carreg-hollt Thank you.

  • @cozmcwillie7897
    @cozmcwillie7897 6 років тому +1

    Bloody great

  • @stevewyatt9546
    @stevewyatt9546 3 роки тому +4

    God save the Queen

    • @ynotnilknarf39
      @ynotnilknarf39 3 роки тому

      No thanks, she and the rest of the 'nobility' of Europe have fucked over the common people for over a thousand years, she's a traitor and broke her sworn oath days after taking the throne.

  • @PanzerFalcon2232
    @PanzerFalcon2232 3 роки тому

    I swear the fleet air arm museum used some of this for the carrier deck experience

  • @heirandspare
    @heirandspare 3 роки тому

    How would this ship perform in the Falklands War?

  • @Blovi-qd4lh
    @Blovi-qd4lh 2 роки тому

    Pretty big aircraft, small deck…varsity. I flew F-4J onboard Indendence(CV-62) and that seemed small.