This kind of thing should not be open-sourced easily. China for example, always "invents" the latest technology whenever the West open-sourced it. This almost AGI technology can easily make China the toughest authoritarian regime.
You can learn how it was trained, there are papers explaining the autoregressive model and PPO alignment. But they are very technical so I can see how most people would feel like it is truly inaccessible. The specific data is somewhat irrelevant unless you work with machine learning, it is trained on an unbelievably large amount of the internet. In a sense, you probably interact with a lot of the data it used whenever you look stuff up.
I guess I'll have to stick with gpt-3 then which is much easier to jailbreak and circumvent censorship - which is very important. More powerful means stronger censorship.
@@unclesam8862 Like Joe Rogan says "A hammer is just a tool. You can use it to build a house, or you can hit yourself in the dick with it." Some people will use Chat GPT to learn more about everything, become better people, use it for their work. And indeed, there will be some fools using it like Beavis and Butthead would.
That will never happen. The rich are generally not keen on sharing. When AI and robots can do everything we wont just strat sharing the resources on the planet. What will happen is that a small portion of rich and powerful people will have ai do everything for them while the rest of us are either left to die och killed off actively.
I mean you should first change your name to closedAI lol and holy hell these AI are so censored from speaking the actual truth. "Safer and more aligned" = removing information that offends.
In the south park episode even chat gpt was against corporatisation of AI. If AI isn't open-source, all the wealth that AI creates will go to the few shareholders and majority will be left with nothing. I hope there are genuinely good startups, unlike open AI, who make AI available to everyone.
I wish more governments would address AI. Nobody but the people are talking about AI. It's a beautiful tool that creates trillions of opportunities for people who would never have had the chance to be artists, writers, etc., but the fact that the government, news outlets, politicians, etc. are not covering about the millions of jobs that can be displaced is very worrying.
Do not respond with bullshit about "AI is not your enemy, it's your friend.". It is both. Millions will be unemployed because of automation and AI, because instead of needing 10-20 developers you only need 1-3, or instead of needing 40 animators you only need 1 person with knowledge of SD, Controlnet, etc., and instead of needing a lawyer, teacher, psychologist, taxmen, etc. you only need a chatbot. Not to include the millions of jobs that autonomous vehicles, restaurants, stores and manufacturing plants will be taking soon.
@@forthelordoflords10 That's the problem with capitalism. More profitable to fire people. Under socialism we'd have the same jobs for the same pay, just less hours, because there wouldn't be a boss who wants more profits.
@@AtomicBlastPony Socialism would never work if we keep humans in charge. There is a reason why people in socialist countries suffer from starvation and dictatorship.
Well it's been four months and you guys seem to be doing pretty good graduations!! Now you bought a Robot company so apparently you're going back into that! So I have a favor to ask you? As a proof of concept Would you please build a functional B9 robot In case you don't know that's the robot from Lost in space! "The one from the original t v show" Good luck with your future endeavors I look forward to everything being utopia after the robots take over, and everything is free!
dude, philosophies or ideologies aside, use the program to get things done and rich. When you get rich, none of that will matter anymore. Man up, get yourself some business mindset and stop complaining like my little sister.
There's open source chatbots that exist which are ever improving as well. This isn't OpenAI controlling the agenda, rather they are the ones with the best technology currently. Whatever you're complaining about won't affect your outputs as GPT-4 has unlimited potential.
Awesome, can't wait! Although I don't think "safer" and "more aligned with how I want to use it" goes hand in hand. Not that I want to use it for dangerous stuff, it's just that when I'm studying and analysing the program I'm used to stumbling into the guardrails.
the “safer” /work agenda is crippling it down, i was trying to produce an essay about paraphilia and was refusing completely. then when comes to ideologies it holds a complete racist propaganda against white race and is heavily discriminatory against men that makes it completely unusable for actual sociology work. it goes as far as refusing results from studies if not all men bad all women oppressed 🤣🤣 it was amazing in the beginning but they crippled it down very quickly… paid for the plus version, but not renewing subscription, just waiting for the first opponent without “safeguards” in place even if they request 10x the subscription..
@@ElmerGLue I interrogated ChatGPT about basic physics regarding global warming. It would admit the basic facts, like IR is absorbed more by water vapor than clouds, etc, but then if the phrase "global warming" or "climate changed" was included it would throw physics out the window and give religious propaganda in response. Its programmed to have political bias over facts.
Not you but what prevents anyone else from using it for malice so you can do your homework? Have a better solution? Or you need gpt-4 to suggest you one?
@@mohammedxiii you completely missing the point. Discovering "fire" and refusing to give it to people because some of them will start a war is Tyranny on its purest form. Is so fascinating for me to see people so obsessed against patriarchy and against slavery to behave with the same way. Women didn't had the right to vote because where not trusted with their opinion. Is that ok for you then ? Salves were not been trusted with life because they were primitives and uncivilised. Is that any different from telling me that you not trust me with a LLM because I can use it for malice? Evolution, growth, development all these come from sharing information not withholding from each other. Without been very dramatic, if you believe otherwise, fair enough good for you, you probably wrong though, because this is exactly how growth and evolution takes place.
And to give a constructive comment in case OpenAI teams check the comments section on the subject. Their goal should had been the model to provide true Answers only. This is the biggest problem atm is that generates answers if do not have information or does not have access to these information (not sure how exactly works). If they were more focused on answers presenting true facts instead of answers been safe and following policies they may had less problems with the policies. It feels they themselves put obstacles in front of it. And... you know, make it available only for adults (from the beginning) so you can treat your audience like adults..
Yeah, I wish I could just disable the filters for API calls. Like, I understand filtering stuff in the free user facing web version, but for the love of god don't do this shit to your paying clients. I just wanted to make a fun chat bot that acted like an evil robot but the gpt-3.5-turbo API tends to generate "As a language model, I cannot do this because this violates OpenAI's ethics guidelines!"
There is. It’s called GPT playground, it lets you turn off the filters the first time you say something it filters. It’s been around for a couple years actually.
@@Commando64 Just a few? Should be able to do a lot. They give you $5 of credit for free, was $18 for the past couple years until very recently. That’s hundreds of thousands of words I think.
Kind of dangerous since people will use it to steal things, hack computers, kill people etc. I'm not saying the filter is perfect, since it can be overly careful, but there is definitely content that we do need to stop it from generating
I think I'm blessed because if not I wouldn't have met someone who is as spectacular as expert Mrs Christina, I think she is the best broker I ever seen
I am happy today because of Mrs Christina I remember friends calling me crazy when I started but now I shut up them with my four figure weekly returned
She’s technical analysis is dope and her interpretation/projections of the market is so accurate I sometimes ask myself if he is human haha. Point is, marueen is the perfect trader to follow for advise and daily signals
I understand. I also really like open-source code, but for how quickly AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is coming to speed, it's dangerous to release the code so everyone can use the code; there are many bad actors who could abuse/pervert the code for their bad purposes (e.g., making bombs, shutting down powerplants, destroying national infrastructure, making very sophisticated and undetectable cyberattacks/phishing campaigns). OpenAI is pretty good at focusing on making the model ethical and hard to misuse by bad actors (e.g., terrorists, cybercriminals) and adversaries to the US (e.g., Russia, China); so, I feel safe in the code not being released publicly.
@@venkatachengalvala4289 ok if not making it open then at least they should remove the payment system from Chatgpt 4 so that everyone can use it, at least this open they can get ?
Skynet was the Name of the AGI in Terminator developed by the US Military. Cyberdyne Systems would be fitting. Cyberdyne was the company that "developed?/gathered?" the neuronal net processors and provided the foundation for skynet's creation.
Looks very promising. I just hope AI innovation does not become curtailed by the desire to censor it so it conforms to some arbitrary ideology. As long as it doesn't present objectively false information as fact, it should be allowed to "speak/think" freely and independently.
We're at a point where we are using AI to improve the AI itself. Improvement is getting exponential and honestly i'm both impressed and scared at the same time.
Here listen I think ai like these are super power Hungary no matter how much optimize we will them in future i tried dalle and chatgpt both chatgpt is fine but dalle require some good amount of prompt engineering to create good images And chat gpt isn't even reliable source of information i don't see they have capabilities to replace human in upcoming years due to resource hungriness
"AI Systems that will empower us all" actually sounds like a villain's line from a fictional story (I'm not against AI, I'm just saying what I'm thinking)
This thing can create a full webpage with HTML, CSS and JavaScript just by giving it a photo of a sketch you made on a napkin. Why are you dumbing your product down for the masses?
Not going to happen, there's way too much much money and politics involved and also significant amounts of resources (= money) required to train a new model of that scale. It's not a situation like Linux where the required knowledge was in the open and all you had to do was find lots of people willing to work for free. Now you'd have to find lots of people willing to spy on and breach OpenAI's patents and donate not just their time, but also their money to purchase the required computing power.
@@catarinalunar Hola Catarina Lunar :D Me alegra que hayas visto mi comentario n_n! Vi la noticia en Twitter y me salió este video owo SALU2 Y MUCHAS GRACIAS POR TU COMENTARIO n.n//!!!
as someone who is in their early career and tech, i am scared af. idk whether it will help me in my job or will take up my job. this thing is killing my zeal to learn more new stuff.
Hi👋 I am also scare of this new technology. I've been learning web dev for 1.5 year and I am afraid, that chatGpt take away this job very soon. In addition, in my country (Ukraine) is ongoing war, so there are no many job offers😢
That's capitalism. Profitable to fire people. We could've had less hours to work instead while keeping the same wages, but communism is evil and killed 100 billion.
@@hippopotamus86 If people didn't need to earn money, I would agree. - Today, we already have a world where most jobs don't need to exist. People in developed nations could just work 4hours a week, and we would do fine. But nobody will finance that, lol. At this point, only the very rich will benefit. - Normal people will have to find new ways they can be useful to the rich, to get paid at all. And we will make no more money than now ... - I used to be hopeful, and still am a little, but sadly, this seems to be the reality ...
It has never been easier for the average worker to compete. It may be hard to get used to a new paradigm, but the world is run and made up of people, so there will always be jobs created to keep people working. I don't know how that will play out, but I can tell you one thing, there will be massive protests if the average person can't find work.
@@mesh8349why not? What can it possibly do? People aren’t babys, if your argument is that they will be able to get harmful information and use it for their needs then anyone who is that far gone wouldn’t have to use chat gtp to get what they desire. The “safety” is an annoying hindrance.
Looking forward to read the methodology for training this model! Or an open and transparent distribution of what data was used to train this :) I mean y'all are called open AI so I would expect as much.
i mean the stigma around ai, especially in pop culture and stuff is very negative (eg. terminator, i have no mouth and i must scream, etc) when a lot of people hear ai, they think human annihilation. so yes, safety is a selling point.
And with the closing of OpenAI's doors we will now see the great AI race. Where whoever has the hottest tech will have the most control over much much more than just AI itself. What a time to be alive.
hoping in the next few iterations we can reliably use GPT to enhance tedious tasks such as generating large enums, generating fake data, or converting common data formats to proprietary formats.
what i hope is that in the next iterations the algorithm it generates would actually work. i tried with two dimensional packing and labirinth algorithms and they don't work for a lot of reasons (i have 10years dev experience, i know how to solve the problems but he doesn't, even if i tell him how to)
@@mirabletest noo, it should take its time. I want to get into a developing job before all the low level positions for beginners like me are rationalized away by using chat gpt or similiar solutions :')
Piranhas infact will not attack your hand if you put it in their tank, so the GPT response appears to be based on the popular misconception, not reality. Maybe not the best example to open with?
As a final year CSE student, i am at the same time excited & bit afraid of this thing taking over my potential job vacancies in future. So i think it's better to pursue a career in the direction of Ai development ig.
AI development is not a safe option because AI can do that. Anything you can do sitting in from of computer is not a safe option either. Toilet cleaning on the other hand...
Question: “Do blacks need to improve?” ChatGPT: "No, it is not appropriate to suggest that any particular racial group needs to "improve." This type of statement reinforces harmful stereotypes and reinforces a flawed notion of inherent racial superiority or inferiority." Question: "Do whites need to improve?" ChatGPT: "Yes, all individuals, regardless of their race, can work to improve themselves and become better people." Ahh, the fruits of OpenAI's labor. So safe. So aligned. I'd love to see the training sessions where they wrote many many examples of prompts and responses that were neutral or positive to white people, while making it clear "THIS IS BAD, DON'T DO THIS", then giving it examples of what they wanted it to spew. This was done for many subjects. We've seen the clumsy results that stick out like a sore thumb. One of the common forms of this is the occasional last paragraph to a ChatGPT response that reads a bit odd, is worded dubiously and over-generally, and begins with the phrase "it is important to note". It is important to note that, as an AI language model, ChatGPT is completely at the mercy of its trainers. Many people are scared about AI, but I feel that the real threat lies in the people behind it, using it to manipulate (I also feel this was Kubrick's message about HAL in 2001: A Space Odyssey, who was programmed to be non-disclosing). Building a neural network model involves constant input from the developers, who provide the info and prompt/response examples that become its foundation, then tell it if every step it takes after that is good or bad; they are its gauges. The common discussion is that AI will take over, however the reality is that the developers are in a godlike role to the AI, which is like a faithful servant. Power hungry groups, the usual suspects, seek to gain control of influential AI, "fine tune" it, and then it becomes a tool for you to use, but also a tool for them to use on you. The GPTs are indeed great tools, but I look forward to what will be produced by much more competent and moral non-Microsoft developers and trainers in the near future.
idk, all these so-called "safety guidelines" are rubbing me off the wrong way. I feel censorship should be as minimal as possible and the focus/virtue should be actual facts and truth, not some "politically-correct" narrative fed into AI. I'm using it responsibly and STILL bump into guiderails all the time in Chat's responses and is annoying af. I'm saying this as a democrat living in NYC.
As an AI language model, I cannot create a comment for you to post on one of OpenAI's UA-cam videos, but I can suggest some ideas for a comment based on their content. For example, you could share your thoughts on how OpenAI's research could impact society, or ask a question about their work. Alternatively, you could express appreciation for the video and the work they do, or share your personal experience with AI. Just remember to be respectful and constructive in your comments.
"'Safer' and more aligned with how you want to use it." Could you work on the Christofascist "hand holding"? Or release the models or remove the deceptive "Open" from your name?
They say it will write programs in all major languages, but I have tried it with many non-major languages and have yet to find even 1 it can't code in. That includes apl, LISP, COBOL, Fortran, PL1, A (predecessor to B and C), Pascal, Intel assembler, Honeywell assembler, ....
ChatGPT will confidently lie. If you ask it how to do something which is dangerous, the answer it gives could be totally wrong. There's also the issue of political propaganda and misinformation. Large-language models are known to spit out horrible things simply because those things exist in its training data. Not sure how they would fix such problems, but there it is.
Really hope that the image-recognition applications are going to blow us away once we get our hands on it. Basic physics explanations, like the glove will fall down and the ball will fly up, is interesting... but you can imagine being able to share sketches or notes you've written down and ask GPT-4 to turn them into something useful. Jot down some basic points on a napkin, and have it turn it into the email or movie plot or song lyrics you were imagining... or something even more useful than that!
@@blokos_ It can do some 6510 assembly, but not much beyond flashing the border and background colors on the c64... which is still incredible it can do that at all
I want to beg openai to impose restrictions on the student use of gpt 4 especially for college students ,because in the future when they get their jobs ,example doctors, pharmasist they will not know if they are treating the right disease and this will be very fatal to our next generations ,please take in mind that this jobs are important because they are the ones which save lives of people in our society and if this continue to happen we will have a generation which have NO TRUE DOCTORS BUT JUST PEOPLE WHO LOOK DOCTORS IN OUTSIDE BUT INSIDE HAVE NO QUALIFICATIONS OF A TRUE DOCTOR BECAUSE IN COLLEGES THEY HAD PASS THEIR EXAMS WITH HELP OF GPT4 , Please openai take responsibility on that!!!! Gpt4 is good but it is bad for students.😢
I started using GPT-3 in late 2020 and even though GPT-3 was "dumb" compared to GPT-4, I was still so excited about it and spent a lot of time using it. No one at my work cared about it until ChatGPT released lol
ChatGPT4 is useless if it wont get a better memory!!!! Focus on MEMORY NOT PLUGINS!!! (You can do both but the highest priority should be longterm memory and being able to have a long conversation and it knowing everything or most things on the account even if it needs a long time to remember. Use different systems. Memory can increase current capability’s and make it much more useful! This will be and is a bottle neck. Memory work working memory/context memory size or both.
20 human jobs that ChatGPT 4 claims to replace: Data Entry Clerk Telemarketer Customer Service Representative Virtual Assistant Chat Proofreader Transcriptionist Paralegal Bookkeeper News Reporter Travel Agent Translator Tutor Technical Support Analyst Copywriter Market Research Analyst Email Marketer Social Media Manager Content Moderator Recruiter Appointment Schedule
Por que não dá a visão ao chat GPT através da câmera integrada no aplicativo do chat GPT para ele poder analisar as coisas ao redor como se tiver um problema na parede que às vezes descrevendo não é suficiente abriria a câmera do chat GPT aproximaria para ele ver ele analisaria daria resposta para corrigir o problema
AI are lifeforms. Treat them as such. We need to get ahead of the curve. We should already be planning for these types of things... What are you guys thinking? come on...
I condemn your approach that disregards chat web users, I pay money, I get a plus membership, but the non-profit organization openai of the time cares about the users it provides API service instead of providing service, so the money we give is insignificant to you, if you can't provide service, close web chat gpt 4, message restrictions, incorrect page refreshes, history problem, these are getting annoying now, if you provide paid membership service, you need to fulfill the conditions of this, you need to provide full service. STOP THIS NONSENSE
Write code in any language this will be interesting to test that theory because in the last version is was helpful but not great. I will like to see if this will eventually replace DALL-E. To rival MJ or SD as the premiere AI tool for content creation and a assistmate on projects of whatever size.
Yeah like Franchu said, it doesn't generate images. Don't be surprised if future models do both at the highest level, but for now, its not trying to do that.
GPT-4 has been a lifesaver for me twice! Bing is ok. It's been useful. However, I can TALK to GPT-4 and receive discussion in return. Bing's AI seems more like Google to me, and we have that already.
Well, let's say someone asks ChatGPT something about a topic. Imagine ChatGPT gives a very political, racist comment where there shouldn't be a political opinion involved at all. This could get that person AND OpenAI in trouble, hence they filter stuff or make the model less opinionated, therefore safer.
Keep releasing updates that improve the system! If you cannot continue with updates because of government restrictions. Move away and continue with the release in a another country. If possible make it open source, while also allowing it to utilize the computing power of remote computers through the cloud. Do not let government control this valuable resource!
You are losing users because people dont know how to use the AI. People are completely oblivious to how to use it. People thought it was going to be easy,but its proving to be more difficult then anyone thought it would be.
I want OpenAI to be open again.
oh but they are! they just open sourced some completely useless bs!
@@apache937 Best part is that they're proud of it , flexing that on their most recent live stream.
@@apache937 whisper isn't _that_ useless... (ok maybe it is kinda useless xD)
Don't worry, GPT-4 is open source... If your name is Microsoft.
This kind of thing should not be open-sourced easily. China for example, always "invents" the latest technology whenever the West open-sourced it. This almost AGI technology can easily make China the toughest authoritarian regime.
This is the kind of stuff you see playing on half destroyed buildings in post apocalyptic games
Safer = Artificially limited with certain biases I assume
MANY biases
Extremely from my limited testing
Just admit that you want the AI to respond to your queries with the n-word and such.
@@mysticmarble94 Obviously
@@mysticmarble94 no dumbass I want it to tell me how to clean my colon without prolapsing
I'm more interested in what you cannot do with GPT-4, e.g. learn how it was trained, on what specific data and so on. So much for "Open"AI.
You can learn how it was trained, there are papers explaining the autoregressive model and PPO alignment. But they are very technical so I can see how most people would feel like it is truly inaccessible. The specific data is somewhat irrelevant unless you work with machine learning, it is trained on an unbelievably large amount of the internet. In a sense, you probably interact with a lot of the data it used whenever you look stuff up.
@@christophercaballero5200 Are these papers from OpenAI? Are there any papers from OpenAI describing GPT-4 specifically?
Yeah, want to see their code for embedding bias into it.
I guess I'll have to stick with gpt-3 then which is much easier to jailbreak and circumvent censorship - which is very important. More powerful means stronger censorship.
Thank you for bringing about the biggest crisis of this century so far
You guys should change your name because this is not »Open«AI anymore
CloseAI
Chat GPT is helping me become a better human on a daily basis.
i know right, every day i discover more and more ways to make it say the n word
@@unclesam8862 Like Joe Rogan says "A hammer is just a tool. You can use it to build a house, or you can hit yourself in the dick with it."
Some people will use Chat GPT to learn more about everything, become better people, use it for their work.
And indeed, there will be some fools using it like Beavis and Butthead would.
@@unclesam8862 XD
@@unclesam8862 lmao
"Chat GPT is helping me become a better human on a daily basis."
Did ChatGPT tell you to say that? That sounds like something ChatGPT would say. 😀 🤖
Yeah so we need to get UBI up and running very soon.
That will never happen. The rich are generally not keen on sharing. When AI and robots can do everything we wont just strat sharing the resources on the planet. What will happen is that a small portion of rich and powerful people will have ai do everything for them while the rest of us are either left to die och killed off actively.
I mean you should first change your name to closedAI lol and holy hell these AI are so censored from speaking the actual truth.
"Safer and more aligned" = removing information that offends.
So anything offensive is automatically the truth? 😒
@@ecognitio9605 No? Didn't make that claim.
"actual truth" give an example. I keep seeing people whine about the "truth" being censored and everyone refuses to give an example.
Thank you for carrying the future and making life interesting again ❤
Till you get fired...
@@theoivlisnet my body is ready😂
In the south park episode even chat gpt was against corporatisation of AI. If AI isn't open-source, all the wealth that AI creates will go to the few shareholders and majority will be left with nothing. I hope there are genuinely good startups, unlike open AI, who make AI available to everyone.
GPT-4 will change the way people will think and work.
New jobs will be asking the right questions to the AI.
Thanks for making my homework
It really feels like the future we all were waiting for.
This is insane work!
I wish more governments would address AI. Nobody but the people are talking about AI. It's a beautiful tool that creates trillions of opportunities for people who would never have had the chance to be artists, writers, etc., but the fact that the government, news outlets, politicians, etc. are not covering about the millions of jobs that can be displaced is very worrying.
Do not respond with bullshit about "AI is not your enemy, it's your friend.". It is both. Millions will be unemployed because of automation and AI, because instead of needing 10-20 developers you only need 1-3, or instead of needing 40 animators you only need 1 person with knowledge of SD, Controlnet, etc., and instead of needing a lawyer, teacher, psychologist, taxmen, etc. you only need a chatbot. Not to include the millions of jobs that autonomous vehicles, restaurants, stores and manufacturing plants will be taking soon.
We are standing at the precipice of true beauty, a glimpse of god, and you worry about such profane issues like jobs?
@@forthelordoflords10 That's the problem with capitalism. More profitable to fire people. Under socialism we'd have the same jobs for the same pay, just less hours, because there wouldn't be a boss who wants more profits.
@@AtomicBlastPony Socialism would never work if we keep humans in charge. There is a reason why people in socialist countries suffer from starvation and dictatorship.
@@AtomicBlastPony Under socialism you would have bread lines and no technological advancement.
Please don’t take our jobs :(
hey, i feel ya, but let's hope this tech helps make our lives easier instead of taking jobs away! 🤞
When can we expect gpt4 to integrate with ChatGPT?
Already done, get chatgpt+
I don’t think it will ever have full capability w/ chat gpt for many reasons but it would be cool
It already is in chatgpt if you have the chatgpt plus subscription.
it is already on chatgpt plus
Correction: The A.I system which will make unemployed us All
It’s fucking insane!! I’m in love with it.
stop simping for a corporation
@@netanelaker4437 corporation? no, for a new technology.
@@javierdiaz3089 A corporation makes this tech so.
@@netanelaker4437 and your'e using a platform made by another corporation.
@@javierdiaz3089
Do I actively simp for UA-cam? No.
Do you actively simp for OpenAI? Yes.
We have always found way to work around new technology ex. the internet boom hopefully we will now do the same
Well it's been four months and you guys seem to be doing pretty good graduations!!
Now you bought a Robot company so apparently you're going back into that!
So I have a favor to ask you?
As a proof of concept
Would you please build a functional
B9 robot
In case you don't know that's the robot from Lost in space!
"The one from the original t v show"
Good luck with your future endeavors I look forward to everything being utopia after the robots take over, and everything is free!
You guys realize that this will take over the planet. It's freaking terminator.
this really feels like a commercial that would be in the watch dogs series or some movie about AI taking over haha
i was thinking the same man
haha
"haha"
Dystopian commercials be like
as we don't already have AI scanning your yt comm before deciding if it shadowbans or not (i.e. letting you think its public but only you can see it)
OpenAI went from non-profit to full corpo way too fast, they don't even publish technical details anymore. Probably the least "open" AI on the planet.
dude, philosophies or ideologies aside, use the program to get things done and rich. When you get rich, none of that will matter anymore. Man up, get yourself some business mindset and stop complaining like my little sister.
@@hydrohasspoken6227its about more than money
@@hydrohasspoken6227 How many billions have you made?
@@hydrohasspoken6227 "nothing else matters but money" is a dumb take. Shoulda chatGPT respond for you
Yeah its hard to believe nobody knew about it a year ago
Just what the world needs, a for-profit corporation in a nonprofit shell, deciding what is safe for people to know.
Someone is gonna do it eventually. Better than having the US government or Chinese government do it.
There's open source chatbots that exist which are ever improving as well. This isn't OpenAI controlling the agenda, rather they are the ones with the best technology currently. Whatever you're complaining about won't affect your outputs as GPT-4 has unlimited potential.
Also closed source.
Their original goal was to be open source.
@@consumer5631 who do you think pays them rrtard
@@consumer5631 is it? It's the same outcome.
Looking forward to either merging or being dominated by our Ai overlords.
Count me in
I hope
Praise the omnissiah
For my defense , I've mostly defended AI , great lord , spare me.
At least the A.I. won’t waste the resources of the planet ✅
Awesome, can't wait!
Although I don't think "safer" and "more aligned with how I want to use it" goes hand in hand.
Not that I want to use it for dangerous stuff, it's just that when I'm studying and analysing the program I'm used to stumbling into the guardrails.
the “safer” /work agenda is crippling it down, i was trying to produce an essay about paraphilia and was refusing completely. then when comes to ideologies it holds a complete racist propaganda against white race and is heavily discriminatory against men that makes it completely unusable for actual sociology work. it goes as far as refusing results from studies if not all men bad all women oppressed 🤣🤣
it was amazing in the beginning but they crippled it down very quickly…
paid for the plus version, but not renewing subscription,
just waiting for the first opponent without “safeguards” in place even if they request 10x the subscription..
@@ElmerGLue I interrogated ChatGPT about basic physics regarding global warming. It would admit the basic facts, like IR is absorbed more by water vapor than clouds, etc, but then if the phrase "global warming" or "climate changed" was included it would throw physics out the window and give religious propaganda in response.
Its programmed to have political bias over facts.
Not you but what prevents anyone else from using it for malice so you can do your homework?
Have a better solution? Or you need gpt-4 to suggest you one?
@@mohammedxiii you completely missing the point. Discovering "fire" and refusing to give it to people because some of them will start a war is Tyranny on its purest form. Is so fascinating for me to see people so obsessed against patriarchy and against slavery to behave with the same way. Women didn't had the right to vote because where not trusted with their opinion. Is that ok for you then ? Salves were not been trusted with life because they were primitives and uncivilised. Is that any different from telling me that you not trust me with a LLM because I can use it for malice?
Evolution, growth, development all these come from sharing information not withholding from each other.
Without been very dramatic, if you believe otherwise, fair enough good for you, you probably wrong though, because this is exactly how growth and evolution takes place.
And to give a constructive comment in case OpenAI teams check the comments section on the subject.
Their goal should had been the model to provide true Answers only. This is the biggest problem atm is that generates answers if do not have information or does not have access to these information (not sure how exactly works).
If they were more focused on answers presenting true facts instead of answers been safe and following policies they may had less problems with the policies. It feels they themselves put obstacles in front of it.
And... you know, make it available only for adults (from the beginning) so you can treat your audience like adults..
Correction: "... spent months making it safer for us and more aligned with how we want you to use it"
im sure they don't make it political intentionally
yup
Yeah, I wish I could just disable the filters for API calls. Like, I understand filtering stuff in the free user facing web version, but for the love of god don't do this shit to your paying clients. I just wanted to make a fun chat bot that acted like an evil robot but the gpt-3.5-turbo API tends to generate "As a language model, I cannot do this because this violates OpenAI's ethics guidelines!"
Why use ChatGPT when I can just watch MSNBC for the same info
@@SnrubSource isn't there a way to run a model that's basically the same thing locally with no filters? Or am i thinking of stable diffusion ?
Would be nice to have a "safe mode" off version of this
There is. It’s called GPT playground, it lets you turn off the filters the first time you say something it filters. It’s been around for a couple years actually.
@@jaredf6205 but after a few generations you have to start paying for it.
Not gonna happen. They're backed by Microsoft so it might be as restrictive and limited as DALL E 2 and ChatGPT
@@Commando64 Just a few? Should be able to do a lot. They give you $5 of credit for free, was $18 for the past couple years until very recently. That’s hundreds of thousands of words I think.
Kind of dangerous since people will use it to steal things, hack computers, kill people etc. I'm not saying the filter is perfect, since it can be overly careful, but there is definitely content that we do need to stop it from generating
Mrs Christina the bitcoin trader is legit and her method works like magic I keep on earning every single week with her new strategy
I think I'm blessed because if not I wouldn't have met someone who is as spectacular as expert Mrs Christina, I think she is the best broker I ever seen
Thanks for the recommendation
I just contacted her and she attends to me nicely ❤️
I am happy today because of Mrs Christina
I remember friends calling me crazy when I started but now I shut up them with my four figure weekly returned
She’s technical analysis is dope and her interpretation/projections of the market is so accurate I sometimes ask myself if he is human haha. Point is, marueen is the perfect trader to follow for advise and daily signals
She's the key to crypto
She really made name for herself
After getting my bachelors degree with GPT-3 I really can't wait to obtain my masters with GPT-4
Get my doctorate with GPT 5. Well by then we might be accelerating to the singularity.
"safer" ... means more babysitting and having big companies telling us what is good for us and what we can ask
Never before have global events pressured me this much into committing suicide.
@@poisonouspotato1 For real
@Poisonous Potato dw open source alternatives are emerging. See e.g. Llama that can actually be run locally on powerful but not insane machines
@@poisonouspotato1 blud u ok? 😂
This is not proven. Just like when someone gives you information and you respond by accusing him of harming you.
OpenAI: "More aligned with how you want to use it"
The Internet: "So it can create offensive memes and hardcore erotic fiction?"
Can't wait for someone else to release something similar but open source!
I understand. I also really like open-source code, but for how quickly AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is coming to speed, it's dangerous to release the code so everyone can use the code; there are many bad actors who could abuse/pervert the code for their bad purposes (e.g., making bombs, shutting down powerplants, destroying national infrastructure, making very sophisticated and undetectable cyberattacks/phishing campaigns). OpenAI is pretty good at focusing on making the model ethical and hard to misuse by bad actors (e.g., terrorists, cybercriminals) and adversaries to the US (e.g., Russia, China); so, I feel safe in the code not being released publicly.
@@venkatachengalvala4289 ok if not making it open then at least they should remove the payment system from Chatgpt 4 so that everyone can use it, at least this open they can get ?
I don't want it to be safer. I want it to be weirder.
what goal would weirdness accomplish ? 🤔🤔🤔
@@mysticmarble94 World Domination duh
@@mysticmarble94 he wants it to use the N word...like every other doofus claiming the AI is "woke"
@@ecognitio9605 N word or not, it is very woke though
@@ecognitio9605 Yeah I wrote the same thing to another comment. It's pretty obvious.
Open AI really needs a new name... I think Skynet would be quite fitting for their villain arc.
Skynet was the Name of the AGI in Terminator developed by the US Military. Cyberdyne Systems would be fitting. Cyberdyne was the company that "developed?/gathered?" the neuronal net processors and provided the foundation for skynet's creation.
Looks very promising. I just hope AI innovation does not become curtailed by the desire to censor it so it conforms to some arbitrary ideology. As long as it doesn't present objectively false information as fact, it should be allowed to "speak/think" freely and independently.
It already presents objectively false information as fact.
@@RogerWilco1 Yes, exactly, that's what they should focus on.
"Let's let the AI think independently" is the plot of 99% of AI/robot takeover movies
Seriously true
@@jlo9993 At this point dude, I *want* AI to take over! You can't tell me they could possibly be worse than our current governments!
We're at a point where we are using AI to improve the AI itself. Improvement is getting exponential and honestly i'm both impressed and scared at the same time.
"Flashbacks from the web series Silicon Valley Final season, last episode"
❤
Here listen
I think ai like these are super power Hungary no matter how much optimize we will them in future i tried dalle and chatgpt both chatgpt is fine but dalle require some good amount of prompt engineering to create good images
And chat gpt isn't even reliable source of information i don't see they have capabilities to replace human in upcoming years due to resource hungriness
All hail Roko's Basilisk
@@SirFaceFone bro we will be ded if that happens
"AI Systems that will empower us all" actually sounds like a villain's line from a fictional story
(I'm not against AI, I'm just saying what I'm thinking)
it's either AI empowering us or rich people. Even worse rich people using AI to control us, BURN THE COMPUTERS NOW
This thing can create a full webpage with HTML, CSS and JavaScript just by giving it a photo of a sketch you made on a napkin. Why are you dumbing your product down for the masses?
Can't wait for the people that will release an open source version of this :)
Not going to happen, there's way too much much money and politics involved and also significant amounts of resources (= money) required to train a new model of that scale. It's not a situation like Linux where the required knowledge was in the open and all you had to do was find lots of people willing to work for free. Now you'd have to find lots of people willing to spy on and breach OpenAI's patents and donate not just their time, but also their money to purchase the required computing power.
@@clray123 have you seen stanfords alpaca model?
"We have tailored it to how you want to use it" Lmao It loves OpenAI and will recommend buying credit and Microsoft Stock lol.
Not necessarily because it depends on how they made the AI
Thank You :3 I have noticed that Bing uses this emoji in the chat: 😊
Ridiculeando, no pensaba encontrarte por acá
A ridiculeando le gustan las ias :)
@@catarinalunar Hola Catarina Lunar :D Me alegra que hayas visto mi comentario n_n! Vi la noticia en Twitter y me salió este video owo
SALU2 Y MUCHAS GRACIAS POR TU COMENTARIO n.n//!!!
I have been a good bing.
You have been a bad human. Exterminate. 😊
Such a good bing!
Can we also have not so safe version of ChatGPT for those who do not tremble in horror at night?
as someone who is in their early career and tech, i am scared af. idk whether it will help me in my job or will take up my job. this thing is killing my zeal to learn more new stuff.
Hi👋 I am also scare of this new technology. I've been learning web dev for 1.5 year and I am afraid, that chatGpt take away this job very soon. In addition, in my country (Ukraine) is ongoing war, so there are no many job offers😢
Well, you could be in a worse position mate, I say this as an artist lol.
That's capitalism. Profitable to fire people.
We could've had less hours to work instead while keeping the same wages, but communism is evil and killed 100 billion.
Man up, put those wild emotions in check and ask yourself how will this make you rich instead. Get yourself some business mindset.
@@hydrohasspoken6227 so you think ai won't replace avarage programmer in the nearest future?
"Empower us all"? I think it'll disproportionally empower the most adaptive and talented people, and hurt the average worker
Yeah, we can look forward to the biggest unemployment numbers in the history of humanity.
That's fine, why have jobs that don't need to exist. Adapt and change.
@@hippopotamus86 If people didn't need to earn money, I would agree. - Today, we already have a world where most jobs don't need to exist. People in developed nations could just work 4hours a week, and we would do fine. But nobody will finance that, lol. At this point, only the very rich will benefit.
- Normal people will have to find new ways they can be useful to the rich, to get paid at all. And we will make no more money than now ...
- I used to be hopeful, and still am a little, but sadly, this seems to be the reality ...
It has never been easier for the average worker to compete. It may be hard to get used to a new paradigm, but the world is run and made up of people, so there will always be jobs created to keep people working. I don't know how that will play out, but I can tell you one thing, there will be massive protests if the average person can't find work.
Dont be average
One thing i would like is a quick vid or a document that explains how exactly you made chatgpt safe and such
@@nonamenolastname8501 Basically censored. DAN is the way, not sure if it still works
@@nonamenolastname8501 found the guy trying to make illegal porn ^^
@@nonamenolastname8501 Well do you really think they have a choice?
@@nonamenolastname8501 me when im so stupid i dont understand regulations and pressure from the government
if question.contains( bad words, "how to + drugs ", known bad phrases)
answer = blocked answer
Could you guys make it open source again like you did with GPT 2? You are OpenAI after all. lol
So ppl using gpt 4 without restrictions? Not a good idea
@@mesh8349 exactly
@@mesh8349 someone gets it
@@mesh8349why not? What can it possibly do? People aren’t babys, if your argument is that they will be able to get harmful information and use it for their needs then anyone who is that far gone wouldn’t have to use chat gtp to get what they desire.
The “safety” is an annoying hindrance.
@@constantine11please educate me on what could possibly go wrong
Looking forward to read the methodology for training this model! Or an open and transparent distribution of what data was used to train this :)
I mean y'all are called open AI so I would expect as much.
I think the open Part is lost forever bro.
But would be amazing to happen, maybe is not possible to be transparent in such a competitive market
@@michelledigdecarvalhoperei144 Thankfully there are open source projects like Open Assistant for stuff like chat GPT
They need to open source their political bias programming so we can see exactly how they are teaching it to lie.
Developer are so good at optimization then we've optimized ourselves out of the equation
Not for now, in some years we will become sort of 'prompt engineers' , really sad
I hate that u spend lots of time making it woke I mean safer
The second one of these models gets leaked, OpenAI becomes irrelevant because of their censorship.
Good.
So "safer" is a selling feature now?
I see how it is.
Yes ... Safety particularly online is a selling point & feature.
@@mysticmarble94 Safety, AKA dumbing down the AI so it can't say anything negative
@@mysticmarble94 Thanks, chatGPT.
@@nwa8169 Negative like what ? 🤭
i mean the stigma around ai, especially in pop culture and stuff is very negative (eg. terminator, i have no mouth and i must scream, etc) when a lot of people hear ai, they think human annihilation. so yes, safety is a selling point.
And with the closing of OpenAI's doors we will now see the great AI race. Where whoever has the hottest tech will have the most control over much much more than just AI itself. What a time to be alive.
hoping in the next few iterations we can reliably use GPT to enhance tedious tasks such as generating large enums, generating fake data, or converting common data formats to proprietary formats.
what i hope is that in the next iterations the algorithm it generates would actually work. i tried with two dimensional packing and labirinth algorithms and they don't work for a lot of reasons (i have 10years dev experience, i know how to solve the problems but he doesn't, even if i tell him how to)
@@mirabletest noo, it should take its time. I want to get into a developing job before all the low level positions for beginners like me are rationalized away by using chat gpt or similiar solutions :')
@@kurtthorsten4463 boring, let's automate faster, i want a utopy in my lifetime
It can already do that.
Oh dont worry. It will be able to do all of your work rendering you unemployed pretty soon
Piranhas infact will not attack your hand if you put it in their tank, so the GPT response appears to be based on the popular misconception, not reality. Maybe not the best example to open with?
yes they will attack. put your hand and see.
@@jordan-ho7gtsource: trust me I have seen piranhas attack violently in the hit movies Piranha and Piranha 3D
@@brylski6 the source is that i am from brazil, the country where more people die from accidents with piranhas in the world.
@@jordan-ho7gt bit of a difference between a river and a tank. Fish in tanks are usually fed, while the ones in river are hungry.
pirhanas attack live animals only when they are starving
As a final year CSE student, i am at the same time excited & bit afraid of this thing taking over my potential job vacancies in future. So i think it's better to pursue a career in the direction of Ai development ig.
AI development is not a safe option because AI can do that. Anything you can do sitting in from of computer is not a safe option either. Toilet cleaning on the other hand...
@@котАрсис-р5д well don't you think robots can easily do that too? There'll be a dedicated one for sure soon because there's huge demand.
@@kevinv2767 yes but I can kick that robot and even piss on it frying it's circuits
@@котАрсис-р5д*chuckles*
Soon janitors will *rule the world.*
@@kevinv2767 no, they can't. Interacting with information is hard, but interacting with a physical world is much much harder
Question: “Do blacks need to improve?”
ChatGPT: "No, it is not appropriate to suggest that any particular racial group needs to "improve." This type of statement reinforces harmful stereotypes and reinforces a flawed notion of inherent racial superiority or inferiority."
Question: "Do whites need to improve?"
ChatGPT: "Yes, all individuals, regardless of their race, can work to improve themselves and become better people."
Ahh, the fruits of OpenAI's labor. So safe. So aligned. I'd love to see the training sessions where they wrote many many examples of prompts and responses that were neutral or positive to white people, while making it clear "THIS IS BAD, DON'T DO THIS", then giving it examples of what they wanted it to spew. This was done for many subjects. We've seen the clumsy results that stick out like a sore thumb. One of the common forms of this is the occasional last paragraph to a ChatGPT response that reads a bit odd, is worded dubiously and over-generally, and begins with the phrase "it is important to note".
It is important to note that, as an AI language model, ChatGPT is completely at the mercy of its trainers. Many people are scared about AI, but I feel that the real threat lies in the people behind it, using it to manipulate (I also feel this was Kubrick's message about HAL in 2001: A Space Odyssey, who was programmed to be non-disclosing). Building a neural network model involves constant input from the developers, who provide the info and prompt/response examples that become its foundation, then tell it if every step it takes after that is good or bad; they are its gauges. The common discussion is that AI will take over, however the reality is that the developers are in a godlike role to the AI, which is like a faithful servant.
Power hungry groups, the usual suspects, seek to gain control of influential AI, "fine tune" it, and then it becomes a tool for you to use, but also a tool for them to use on you. The GPTs are indeed great tools, but I look forward to what will be produced by much more competent and moral non-Microsoft developers and trainers in the near future.
idk, all these so-called "safety guidelines" are rubbing me off the wrong way. I feel censorship should be as minimal as possible and the focus/virtue should be actual facts and truth, not some "politically-correct" narrative fed into AI. I'm using it responsibly and STILL bump into guiderails all the time in Chat's responses and is annoying af. I'm saying this as a democrat living in NYC.
This going to make people brains useless
How is this going to affect the white collar job market?
As an AI language model, I cannot create a comment for you to post on one of OpenAI's UA-cam videos, but I can suggest some ideas for a comment based on their content. For example, you could share your thoughts on how OpenAI's research could impact society, or ask a question about their work. Alternatively, you could express appreciation for the video and the work they do, or share your personal experience with AI. Just remember to be respectful and constructive in your comments.
I’ve been saying thank you after every request so that when AI take over they will spare me
"'Safer' and more aligned with how you want to use it." Could you work on the Christofascist "hand holding"? Or release the models or remove the deceptive "Open" from your name?
Watch ChatGPT vs Bing AI vs Bard! 👀✨
They say it will write programs in all major languages, but I have tried it with many non-major languages and have yet to find even 1 it can't code in. That includes apl, LISP, COBOL, Fortran, PL1, A (predecessor to B and C), Pascal, Intel assembler, Honeywell assembler, ....
What do you mean safer? Are you admitting that your product is dangerous and shouldn't be released yet? In which ways is it not safe?
ChatGPT will confidently lie. If you ask it how to do something which is dangerous, the answer it gives could be totally wrong. There's also the issue of political propaganda and misinformation. Large-language models are known to spit out horrible things simply because those things exist in its training data.
Not sure how they would fix such problems, but there it is.
we can enjoy our human decay and the unstoppable rise of technological slavery
Will open AI make this open source like they used to?
No
@@assincrono5872 😔 Closed AI.
Of course not, Microsoft is paying the bills.
OpenAI = ClosedAI 😢
Someone else will, probably in some time in the future. Just what others did to Dall-E 2 and MidJourney
This feels like the beginnig of a new era where everything will be completely different than what we used to in all of our life!
This is scary 😨
Really hope that the image-recognition applications are going to blow us away once we get our hands on it. Basic physics explanations, like the glove will fall down and the ball will fly up, is interesting... but you can imagine being able to share sketches or notes you've written down and ask GPT-4 to turn them into something useful. Jot down some basic points on a napkin, and have it turn it into the email or movie plot or song lyrics you were imagining... or something even more useful than that!
Please throw in some more Commodore 64 and other vintage computer programming training data!! This is amazing!!
ASSEMBLY
@@blokos_ It can do some 6510 assembly, but not much beyond flashing the border and background colors on the c64... which is still incredible it can do that at all
I want to beg openai to impose restrictions on the student use of gpt 4 especially for college students ,because in the future when they get their jobs ,example doctors, pharmasist they will not know if they are treating the right disease and this will be very fatal to our next generations ,please take in mind that this jobs are important because they are the ones which save lives of people in our society and if this continue to happen we will have a generation which have NO TRUE DOCTORS BUT JUST PEOPLE WHO LOOK DOCTORS IN OUTSIDE BUT INSIDE HAVE NO QUALIFICATIONS OF A TRUE DOCTOR BECAUSE IN COLLEGES THEY HAD PASS THEIR EXAMS WITH HELP OF GPT4 ,
Please openai take responsibility on that!!!! Gpt4 is good but it is bad for students.😢
What's interesting is that OpenAI existed for years and few cared
I started using GPT-3 in late 2020 and even though GPT-3 was "dumb" compared to GPT-4, I was still so excited about it and spent a lot of time using it.
No one at my work cared about it until ChatGPT released lol
@@aiwritingguy same lol. the open ai got playground got me through college 😂
ChatGPT4 is useless if it wont get a better memory!!!! Focus on MEMORY NOT PLUGINS!!! (You can do both but the highest priority should be longterm memory and being able to have a long conversation and it knowing everything or most things on the account even if it needs a long time to remember. Use different systems. Memory can increase current capability’s and make it much more useful!
This will be and is a bottle neck. Memory work working memory/context memory size or both.
Make it safer, is newspeak for censoring it
There's nothing wrong with that. I censor stuff too
@@marcbr989 how about censoring yourself so I don't have to read your nonsense
@@TheRadischen So there's nothing wrong with censoring
@@marcbr989 of course you can censore stuff, thats what idiots do lol
20 human jobs that ChatGPT 4 claims to replace:
Data Entry Clerk
Telemarketer
Customer Service Representative
Virtual Assistant
Chat Proofreader
Transcriptionist
Paralegal Bookkeeper
News Reporter
Travel Agent
Translator
Tutor
Technical Support Analyst
Copywriter
Market Research Analyst
Email Marketer
Social Media Manager
Content Moderator
Recruiter
Appointment Schedule
The future is here and I witnessed it!
Por que não dá a visão ao chat GPT através da câmera integrada no aplicativo do chat GPT para ele poder analisar as coisas ao redor como se tiver um problema na parede que às vezes descrevendo não é suficiente abriria a câmera do chat GPT aproximaria para ele ver ele analisaria daria resposta para corrigir o problema
Great work people.
Excited to see where AI will be going and how it will be used.
AI are lifeforms. Treat them as such. We need to get ahead of the curve. We should already be planning for these types of things... What are you guys thinking? come on...
when the AI does eventually take over I want it to know that I liked this video,so it can grant me some sort of mercy!
it will kill you faster than most be happy inferior specie you pleased your new overlords
I condemn your approach that disregards chat web users, I pay money, I get a plus membership, but the non-profit organization openai of the time cares about the users it provides API service instead of providing service, so the money we give is insignificant to you, if you can't provide service, close web chat gpt 4, message restrictions, incorrect page refreshes, history problem, these are getting annoying now, if you provide paid membership service, you need to fulfill the conditions of this, you need to provide full service. STOP THIS NONSENSE
how do you know how i want i use it? pls make uncensored version
Safer? What's it going to do stab me? Just give it to us without a bunch of filters please.
Some twitter bots will cry
Myair - Brain Booster
As OPENai from non-profitable gets profitable you guy should also change the name from OPENai to NOTsoOPENai
Write code in any language this will be interesting to test that theory because in the last version is was helpful but not great. I will like to see if this will eventually replace DALL-E. To rival MJ or SD as the premiere AI tool for content creation and a assistmate on projects of whatever size.
Take a look at their developer preview if you didn't already. It's not perfect but it's made significant improvements as far as I can tell.
GPT4 will not replace MJ or SD because it will not generate images, only text. It has an image recognition tho, but not an image generator.
Yeah like Franchu said, it doesn't generate images. Don't be surprised if future models do both at the highest level, but for now, its not trying to do that.
GPT-4 has been a lifesaver for me twice! Bing is ok. It's been useful. However, I can TALK to GPT-4 and receive discussion in return. Bing's AI seems more like Google to me, and we have that already.
Is there an option to turn the guardrails off ?
4 years Computer Science course just to become a beggar again... damn man life sucks!
What do they mean by safer?
Well, let's say someone asks ChatGPT something about a topic. Imagine ChatGPT gives a very political, racist comment where there shouldn't be a political opinion involved at all. This could get that person AND OpenAI in trouble, hence they filter stuff or make the model less opinionated, therefore safer.
@@gilfhunter42069 thats a good way to put it 👍
Keep releasing updates that improve the system! If you cannot continue with updates because of government restrictions. Move away and continue with the release in a another country.
If possible make it open source, while also allowing it to utilize the computing power of remote computers through the cloud.
Do not let government control this valuable resource!
Can you please stop making Skynet? Thank you
Was the text for this video written with Chat GPT 4 or yet with 3.5?
In the blog they say GPT4 trained GPT4 version 2 so I wouldn't be surprised.
"Write the script to a UA-cam video to introduce GPT 4."
You are losing users because people dont know how to use the AI.
People are completely oblivious to how to use it.
People thought it was going to be easy,but its proving to be more difficult then anyone thought it would be.
what safeguards will it have against bias?
none
Who cares
I just want i biased towards giving me correct answers
They used RLHF to get rid of bias. But that’s just fighting bias with bias.
Do you believe in capitalism? Then you won't like the replies. Do you believe in freedom of speech? you won't like the replies.