Dr Gijsbers - How often we need to say thank you for posting these videos. Would you be interested in how this relates to Critical Realism, which may be viewed a development of causality. If so it would be great if you did a series on Bhaskar's work. Your English is way better than you seem to think - we do call it lead (as in the pun: 'one can take a horse to water but a pencil must be lead') and it really is graphite (according to Google you would call it grafiet). This illustrates Bhakar's approach to science. It is subject to change but generally it is OK to use it in the best form we have it - it used to be thought that graphite was a form of lead).
Thanks But what is the method of understanding the concept of causality? Is causality a concept which is empirical or it is our mind to relate cause and effect ? So how she denies the necessity connection of cause and effect?
In order to defend free will she adopts a weird notion in which randomness is characterised as free will as if the person who catches a virus from an infected person was suffering from a failure of the will (assuming she did not want the virus).
Thanks again, Your vids are a great way of interfering with my normal thinking patterns.
Dr Gijsbers - How often we need to say thank you for posting these videos. Would you be interested in how this relates to Critical Realism, which may be viewed a development of causality. If so it would be great if you did a series on Bhaskar's work. Your English is way better than you seem to think - we do call it lead (as in the pun: 'one can take a horse to water but a pencil must be lead') and it really is graphite (according to Google you would call it grafiet). This illustrates Bhakar's approach to science. It is subject to change but generally it is OK to use it in the best form we have it - it used to be thought that graphite was a form of lead).
Thank you very much! A clear explanation of a complex text. Doe je goed :)
Thanks
But what is the method of understanding the concept of causality?
Is causality a concept which is empirical or it is our mind to relate cause and effect ?
So how she denies the necessity connection of cause and effect?
In order to defend free will she adopts a weird notion in which randomness is characterised as free will as if the person who catches a virus from an infected person was suffering from a failure of the will (assuming she did not want the virus).
Helpful
when in doubt, exercise your will
Allah bless you bro!! your material is very helpfull!!
Glad to hear it!
Talk about Aesthetic theories sometime
Maybe I will, but it's not really my field! I'm much more knowledgeable about metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of science.