Hey I managed to catch one of your newer videos close to release and want to thank you in a comment I know has a pretty good chance compared to one on a video from a few years ago. Your videos were a god send for me during the covid years and even alot in brushing up for my further mechanics/analysis of materials couses. Im positive your videos have helped alot of people and will help countless more engineers and interested people. You are one of the very few professors than can make this content understandable via video. Keep up the awesome work!
No doubt he is one of the most brilliant teacher in SOM today, I had been really struggling to understand this topic for so long and there are no proper explanations available on youtube for this topic
Had a lot of confusion in the topic when my prof taught me this. All my queries have now been dispelled after watching your amazing lecture. This series has helped me a lot in mechanics of solids course. Thanks a ton!
ı still cant understand when writing y from the Q of the upper part you write from the outer to centroid of the piece part. But when writing the bottom Q you write y from the centroid of the piece part to neutural axis . I dont get itttt where are we going the write y from ? Is my question clear, understandable ?
If i understand your question, that is not what he did for the upper part. The y is always going to be the distance from the shape's centroid to the neutral axis, whether the point of interest is above or below the neutral axis.
From the neutral axis of the whole part to the very top of the part was 37.5 mm. So the centroid of that area must be in the middle of the 37.5 which (divide by 2) is 18.75mm. Hope this helps
Your lectures are carrying me and all of my friends through statics, dynamics, and solids, thanks a lot! Couldn't of done it without you Jeff
Even when you think you know, you watch Prof Hanson's video and then boom, you get a new insight and have fun doing it. thank you sir! You're a genius
Hey I managed to catch one of your newer videos close to release and want to thank you in a comment I know has a pretty good chance compared to one on a video from a few years ago. Your videos were a god send for me during the covid years and even alot in brushing up for my further mechanics/analysis of materials couses. Im positive your videos have helped alot of people and will help countless more engineers and interested people. You are one of the very few professors than can make this content understandable via video. Keep up the awesome work!
Thank you so much for the great note!
No doubt he is one of the most brilliant teacher in SOM today, I had been really struggling to understand this topic for so long and there are no proper explanations available on youtube for this topic
Had a lot of confusion in the topic when my prof taught me this. All my queries have now been dispelled after watching your amazing lecture. This series has helped me a lot in mechanics of solids course. Thanks a ton!
Brilliant. Such an abstract concept explained so clearly and with excellent examples and analogy!
watching this even an year after graduating!!!! great professor and so well explained
Such great explanations and such a fun guy. You make learning both fun and exciting, thank you! 🙂
You just totally solved all my problems and confusions about Q!!! Thank you very much!!
My professor suggested you. And holy cow was she right! Thank you jeff!
Thank you Jeff! These videos have helped me so much studying for my final. You explain things clearly and concisely.
Thanks for your class! It was confusing but now I got it :)
Wonderful solids lessons!! really taking the time to explain the problems along with a good sense of humor :))
Thank you so much, your videos are saving the day once again!!
THE BEST TEACHER IS HERE.
Excellent! Thank you!
Thank you sir. I really appreciate it!
LOVE YOU FROM SAUDI ARABIA. I could have never passed solid with out you!!!
Thank you for the videos... I learned a lot :)
this guy is the best
Thank you Jeff
You’re the best!
thank you! YOU ARE THE MAN!!!
Thanks Jeff!
I love this guy
this was super helpful thank you :)
thank you so much
you are the best
This is exactly how i searched for in my brain before youtube. "What the heck is that Q" and then found this video lol
At Qb isent there missing area from neutral axis down on the flange?
thank you so much sir
Osam dude love from Pakistan
at 7:06 shouldn't it be 1250/12 instead of 1350/12? resulting in 104.167 instead of 112.5?
Its fine as it, because 1250000 + 100000 is equal to 1350000
Would q be zero if the neutral axis was considered the point of interest?
Thank you
thanks,sir
ı still cant understand when writing y from the Q of the upper part you write from the outer to centroid of the piece part. But when writing the bottom Q you write y from the centroid of the piece part to neutural axis . I dont get itttt where are we going the write y from ? Is my question clear, understandable ?
If i understand your question, that is not what he did for the upper part. The y is always going to be the distance from the shape's centroid to the neutral axis, whether the point of interest is above or below the neutral axis.
@@katiemaletta45 ooh okay I understand now thank you !!
@@sevgipnar5261 sevgi yani gerçek Q , QA olara hesapladığımız 140 olan değilmi
gerek kalmadı sağol sevgi bende anladım.
@@Made_by_profs tamamdır bende şimdi açıklamaya çalışacaktım 😅
lifesaver
How the hell did he work out the distance between the top shape centroid to the neutral axis. I dont understand how it is 18.75
From the neutral axis of the whole part to the very top of the part was 37.5 mm. So the centroid of that area must be in the middle of the 37.5 which (divide by 2) is 18.75mm. Hope this helps
What the heck is q is the most valid question ever asked
good
Leuschke Roads
u legend
Goated
Ada Squares
Jarod Overpass
Q is moment using area but not force to find because it is very hard to measure the force in real life but very easy to measure the area.