Hey, correct me if I'm wrong Mr. Beat because I'm Scottish but I'm pretty sure at least with the second one, habeas corpus was allowed be suspended in a time of war or rebellion such as the civil war, which was within Lincoln's powers. Plus the Confederate states did it more than the Union.
@@thescrout9831 sure he was legally allowed to do it, but that doesn’t mean he should have. A whole bunch of bad stuff could have been avoided by keeping it in place
It really wasn't a war. It was basically a glorified looting expedition, with murder and arson, a way of life. The Yankees would steal anything that wasn't bolted down, and if it was too heavy to carry away, they would just burn it.
That’s why I respect him man managed to stop the confederate vampires basically single-handily using only his trusty wood cutting axe he was built different
I know that you're joking, but I once got insulted as being 'out of touch with reality' for an answer to a question regarding that, even though I literally began that answer by noting in a disclaimer that the entire book was historical fiction. What'd that prick expect me to do, ask him if he fabricated his description of 'ex-CIA' and compose music about how I would love to kill a certain malignant narcissist in all sorts of ways that would horrify the most hardened of war criminals!?
If I remember correctly, one of his last actions was giving the territory of future Las Vegas to Nevada instead of Arizona, and as an Arizonan this is tragic.
“Jefferson Davis never told you the truth about Lincoln” “He told me enough, he told me he was a Tyrant!” “No Johnny, *Davis* was a tyrant.” “That’s not true…that’s impossible!“ “Check your facts Johnny; you know it to be true” “NOOoOOoO!”
I agree, with you on #3. I agree with Mr. Beat on #1 and #2 even though I usually don't agree with him on many things. History is fascinating, different viewpoints even more so
@@kenw2225 Yeah, and the tribes stole land from amongst each other all of the time with wars and massacres. Why is it only wrong when American forces ask them to leave with guns drawn? _“You guys got guns and horses while we only got tomahawks and spears. That’s cheating!”_ 😡
@@kenw2225 yeah right man, Lincoln ignored the active genocide happening in his nation. He took millions of acres of land from them, broke treaties. You can admire the men who built this country without ignoring their atrocities.
On the Native American executions- The most famous of them was the “Dakota 38”, so-called because 38 men were hung on December 26, 1862. This was at the end of the “Dakota War”, which had begun over some delayed payments that government agents had promised and suspicions of corruption from said agents. The commissioner of affairs for the Dakota agents, George Day, wrote to Lincoln in January of 1862 and said that: “I have discovered numerous violations of law & many frauds committed by past Agents & a superintendent. I think I can establish frauds to the amount from 20 to 100 thousand dollars & satisfy any reasonable intelligent man that the indians whom I have visited in this state & Wisconsin have been defrauded of more than 100 thousand dollars in or during the four years past.” In August, some settlers were killed by Dakota natives, its unsure why. It should be noted that not all of the Dakota went to war, only a specific faction. After some back and forth, the natives lost and were put on “trial”, although many modern historians and even contemporary officials in Lincoln's administration asserted that there were trumped up charges and falsities-it was more of a formality than a real trial. The secretary of the navy, Gideon Welles, wrote that "I was disgusted with the whole thing; the tone and opinions of the dispatch are discreditable…what may have been the provocation we are not told.” Lincoln ordered a stay of execution until he could review the trials himself, which was delivered to the troops on October 17. Obviously, since this was happening out West, it took time for information and instructions to go back and forth. 303 Dakota men were indicted and prepared to be executed, and Lincoln faced intense political pressure to give it the go-ahead. He was warned numerous times that if he didn't riotous and angry settlers would carry out mass murders anyway. From newspapers to the highest levels of the Senate, people of all social orders had demanded the executions. Alexander Ramsey, the Governor of Minnesota, wrote to him urging the executions to be approved. "I hope the execution of every Sioux Indian condemned by the military court will be at once ordered...[i]t would be wrong upon principle and policy to refuse this. Private revenge would on all this border take the place of official judgment on these Indians." Eventually, Lincoln commuted the executions of 265 men, allowing for 39 to still go ahead. In a message to the Senate that December, Lincoln said "Anxious to not act with so much clemency as to encourage another outbreak on the one hand, nor with so much severity as to be real cruelty on the other, I caused a careful examination of the records of trials to be made, in view of first ordering the execution of such as had been proved guilty of violating females.” Lincoln further tried to make a distinction between 'battles' and 'massacres', justifying the commuting of further sentencing as only 2 men could be proven guilt of rape. After more evidence was reviewed, 38 men were executed. All in all, I don't think Lincoln should be entirely excused from every controversial decision just because he is revered by many (including me). But it is important to understand that his political pragmatism undergirded basically every decision he made as President up until 1865.
Ya. I agree, but 99.9% of the indoctrinated snowflakes. After reading what you said 5 times. Haven’t a clue what you just said. Probably to your benefit or their delicate sensitivity’s would get it deleted. Factual as it is. The context of the times 🤷♀️
Glad there’s someone as big as you talking about Lincoln’s flaws. Not many scrape past the surface level “the good guys win every war” propaganda they were taught in schools.
As a Minnesotan, the massacre of 38 Dakota warriors after the Dakota War of 1862 was originally supposed to be 300, Lincoln decreased the number to 38. Though I can’t attest to his other actions that could be considered negative against natives
Just a quick note on Lincoln suspending Habeas Corpus- at the start of the war he only suspended it along railway lines so Congress could actually get to DC and convene. And when he did suspend it for the entire country in 1863, he did it with full congressional approval.
I hate how Mr. Beat did not mention this point. But it’s was a pretty short video which in my opinion is makes it bad especially in a topic like this where someone who is going to watch this will get a pretty simple explanation with no added reasons, details and events and have their mind made up on this topic.
Yeah , just like the mainstream media always seems to leave out specific points as they are spinning their yarns ! Where’s Paul Harvey when you need him to give us …. “ The rest of the Story “ 🤷🏽♂️
@@greggs12315That is why complex topics need to be given serious time to address a serious and complex issue. Davis and the CSA did far worse by suspending Habeas corpus and using that to declare martial law, for 3 years.
The first two can be partially explained away cuz he was in a civil war so I don't mind him too much for that. But yeh the Native American one, that's a totally and completely valid criticism, i think
But this is also why I am horrified by martial law. During times of chaos, the President's power should still be checked. It can be a slippery slope to a dictatorship.
@@iammrbeat Wasn't it mostly just along the main railways & telegraph lines? Because we have plenty of examples of papers in New York and the like decrying how Lincoln waged the war.
I feel like the native american one wasnt all that different from other presidents of the time, not an excuse but certainly not a reason to exclude Lincoln for that. Just my opinion though, if anyone has more information I'd be happy to read it
Maybe we should really have two separate rankings: positive accomplishments and negative accomplishments, rather than one ranking of net effect. LBJ and Nixon would rank pretty high on both lists, I'd imagine.
@@everettatwater2939 Like normalizing relations with Communist China, essentially saving them from imploding and losing the US' Industrial Manufacturing power?
@@everettatwater2939 correct me if im wrong here but didnt nixon also start the drug war? its generally seen as a disaster which actually increased drug use and violence within the us
#3 Is certainly correct, but some historians like to point out that Lincoln actually pardoned a whole 265 Native Americans at the mass hanging you picture at 0:47 (Making the largest mass execution on U.S. soil not 303 people, but 38.)
Another thing that dampens his reputation in my eyes is that the emancipation proclamation effectively freed nobody. He had no control over the south so they obviously didn’t listen to it, and the border states (Maryland, Kentucky, Missouri) were all allowed to keep their slaves throughout the war while staying in the union. I mean maryland is right next to DC, Lincoln literally had to pass by slavery very often in his own country while waging war against the south.
@@wta1518 I agree. Lincoln always said his priority was preservation of the union. It makes me wonder how his presidency would’ve played out if the south didn’t decide to secede before he even took office.
I hope you do understand Lincoln had arrested many people because the Maryland Governor and majority of the State assembly wanted to secede. And Lincoln did express wanting to reform Indian affairs, of course something else happened
@@ryanash4681 Yea it was a war measure, it allowed the army to free people in the south. Lincoln didn’t want to piss off the northern states which were still in the Union.
I find these somewhat excusable in the context of him having to deal with a grisly conflict that’s tearing the country apart. You can’t assess Lincoln the same as a Monroe or Clinton.
The thing about Habeas Corpus is that there were circumstances where the government _could_ suspend it, but bare minimum it needed Congressional approval, which Lincoln didn't seek before suspending it (probably because he knew he wouldn't get it). On top of that, Lincoln also mishandled the secession crisis once in office. Remember, at the time of his swearing in the Upper South hadn't seceded yet. They wouldn't secede until Lincoln called up the state militias to crush the secessionist states. Had he handled the situation better he could've potentially avoided at least some if not most (possibly even all) of the Upper South from seceding and maybe even could've succeeded in negotiating a peaceful end to the crisis. The Deep South could've been brought back in with time and effort.
This video demonstrates one of the flaws in our educational system: we romanticize our national heroes to the point of depicting them as flawless. Thank you, Mr. Beat, for showing me a fuller, realistic picture of Abraham Lincoln.
Nobody said he was flawless. It’s just ridiculous to act like he’s not a great president all because of the huge important scandal of locking up confederates during a time of civil war🤣🤣what a horrible thing he did by locking up traitors to the nation
That's not what's wrong with the education system, what's wrong with it is the government is involved. Lincoln is a good president and should be highly regarded, but he was not an evil man.
The grandson of Francis Scott Key, Francis Key Howard, the editor of the Baltimore Exchange, was arrested for writing against Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus. He was imprisoned at Ft McHenry 47 years after his grandfather had witnessed the bombardment of that same fort by the British and compelling Francis Scott Key to write the words which would later be sung in our national anthem. Francis Key Howard later wrote about his ordeal in the book, 'Fourteen Months in American Bastilles.'
But that's making it acceptable to do it. Then what? What else is it okay under? And if it's okay to suspend...then why have it at all, in the first place...just 'most' of the time?
@@noahhyde8769 The Constitution literally allows for it. I'm sorry, but when society breaks down social norms go out the window. Sometimes you got to do what you got to do.
Chose Andrew Johnson as vp, allowing him to destroy so much of what could have been achieved under Reconstruction before the Radical Republicans managed to stop him.
I will always stand by the north should have razed the south and killed alot more slavers because this, modern America, is what happens when you just let the slavers live and keep all their money and power and expect them to not treat the people they don't think sre people better
Yeah, I disagree with Mr Beat still but I get *why* he slightly disfavors Lincoln To me, his greatest accomplishments (emancipation and keeping the country together) is enough to outweigh the above to the degree I still have him as Number 1
@@kelpermoon23 civil war is no reason to violate the constitution. In fact, he's fighting the civil war to uphold the constitution, it would be really hypocritical to violate it at the same time
@@kelpermoon23 Disagree. There is no situation in which any government actor or group of government actors has any authority to violate the Bill of Rights. If you are aware or such authority, which would have to be described in the Constitution (including the amendments), your instruction would be most appreciated.
Though I see your points and reasoning (and respect you for sharing your opinion on this), I still think he was a very good president. But thanks to you, I will look at Lincoln with a more complete view. And it's okay that you don't think he was the best. At the end of the day, we are all people and are entitled to our own opinions.
He also didn't want to ban slavery until he was worried that European powers might get involved on the side of the confederacy, so he pledged to outlaw slavery if the Union would win therefore Europe stayed out of it.
Fair enough. I mean, sure Lincoln had his problems. Every President has (In fact I dare Mr Beat to say one thing about George Washington he disagrees with). But in the end, he still led the country through the civil war, preserved the Union, and deserves a lot of the credit for ending slavery, even if he was initially a moderate on the issue. I think people were also confused as to why FDR wasn’t on that list.
Don't apologize. You are being honest in your evaluation of the presidents. We need more people who will be completely honest when it comes to who their favorites are, and when it comes to all history, not just ours or theirs. I have zero problem with what you said.
Yea, reading about how he went from like one term as a US representative to President was a trip lol. To say nothing of all the political bullsh*t he had to deal with during his actual presidency. Lyndon B. Johnson was pretty talented at that too
That's no way to measure greatness in a real sense, especially in what is supposed to be democratic countries. In the same breath you could utter that most of the 20th century dictators were the greatest politicians ever. Lincoln was a tyrant, just like any political actor would be in his position, wars are terrible things for freedom. I am an Englishman, and I know for Americans, Lincoln is a hero on many levels. I have seen American media present him as a saint. In my perspective, if I'm to compare him to a great British politician, it would be Churchill. Both men faced a war, and both men sent young men to die in pointless battles during said war. I will say this, both men made the situation worse then it should have been, and if they did nothing in response to the wars, the world would be a much better place today. It's a hard thing to swallow but, I cannot find it to be untrue. Lincoln should have let the south be subjected to the huge slave population when they inevitably have had enough. Churchill should have not given the political power to Hitler to wage his total war.
A genius in that respect. Despite these three things, I’m still a huge Lincoln fan, but Mr Beats reasons are tough to argue-but it’s still important we remember the great things he did as well. Washington still the OG, and also Ulysses S Grant is underrated!
@@OuroborosAlchemist I respectfully disagree. Neville Chamberlain who had a philosophy similar to this is what allowed Hitler to grow so powerful in the first place. Sometimes pure democracy is just not the answer to strenuous situations.
Yes, because to take him out of his Greek temple, his Memorial, would cause a lot of uncomfortable truths about the rationale for pursuing actions that led to over 620,000 dirt naps and the destruction of half the country while doing in the We st. exactly the opposite of what he claimed to be doing in the So. uth
Every US president, before and after him, had terrible indigenous policy because America itself only exists because its origins of Europeans ethically cleansing land of the indigenous population and settling people deemed the "right race". The US never be a state for indigenous people because it was explicitly created to exclude them, no matter how much you try to reform and we really haven't, like the government sterilized like 1 in 4 indigenous women in the 70s or 80s. This also applies to Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Israel.
It wasn’t really his Native American policy it was established policy for years but he didn’t change it. Like how Obama and Biden are continuing with deportations and with the broken system of immigration down there we have because they are distracted by other things are this is not enough political points to change it. Although it is worth pointing out that Lincoln asked for changes to the Indian system in his last two state of the union addresses.
Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus is specifically allowed in the Constitution, in the event of rebellion or invasion. What the Constitution does not mention is who can do it. There’s a valid argument for Congress, rather than the President, having that authority.
The Legislative Branch Article 1 Section 10 Sub Section 3 Says; No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of Delay.
The criticisms that Mr. Beat made are fair. But there’s a reason why Lincoln is always highly rated. Previously Mr. Beat said that if he was looking at it from a technical standpoint and not objective, Lincoln would be along side Washington.
Thanks for posting this. History books should tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. The version of Lincoln history that I got as a child was like saying “Diddy saw all these individuals that could benefit from his social connections, so he made a lot of introductions that might never have happened without his aid. Countless people remember his famous words `Now, what y'all wanna do? Wanna be ballers, shot callers, brawlers? Who be dippin' in the Benz with the spoilers?’ He changed the lives of a lot of people”. Smh, Leaves too much out. Leaves students thinking “this person was a cool lyricist and benevolent figure”.
Lincoln never went to war to stop slavery, as a matter of fact there's a letter he wrote saying he could care less about them. He was more worried about keeping the country together
Lincoln was morally opposed to slavery and he said so publicly. He was consistently anti-slavery for his entire political career. One letter doesn’t negate an entire career of opposition to slavery.
@@SimonBellaMondo morally opposed to slavery doesn't mean he's anti slavery all together. He still allowed slavery in Union states where slavery was legal for understandable reasons, his emancipation proclamation applied to the 'rebel' states. The civil war for him was more about preserving the union, he just didn't want slavery to expand further.
@@ExPraetorianGuard-dl1pz He had to do that to keep the support of southern states that were on the union side. Lincoln was a strong supporter of the 13th amendment freeing all slaves which passed in December of 1865 the same year he died.
A civil war is unique, in that it is people vs people within one nation. The government must necessarily pick one side. Which side is arbitrary, but it must have a clear position. It therefore can treat certain citizens as effectively enemies of the state, and restrict their rights to prevent further harm to the country. FYI, we do this with domestic terrorists, felons etc. Being a threat to the public DOES reduce your rights.
Everyone sucked in the past. This obsession of looking at everything with today lens is an injustice. Keep in mind how miserable Lincoln life was from just serving the public. Lincoln was a miserable man and he took on the full weight of his decisions. Not only did Lincoln keep the country together he was assassinated for his efforts
Can you elaborate on what “mass executions” you’re talking about for point 3? From what I recall, large amounts of warriors were slated to be executed after the Eastern Sioux Massacre, but Lincoln’s influence actually led to far fewer receiving the death penalty
As a matter of fact. Lincoln ordered that no natives should be executed without his approval. Later, Lincoln personally read the case files of the 300 or so charged men to determine if they deserved death. Most of those men were not killed and only around 20 were executed.
@@cornballfungus yeah, I usually love Mr. Beat, but somehow he failed to research this point fully and just bought into a trendy narrative, which is a bit disappointing
@@gravesidepoet5405 it has nothing to do with who agrees with whom, a quick Internet search about the Eastern Sioux Massacre and five minutes of reading would confirm we’re right
@@gravesidepoet5405 he thinks he's debunked it because he trusts the details that "someone else" has brought in, details which do in fact debunk something.
I'll also add a few of my issues with Lincoln. 1. He "freed" the slaves not on a humanitarian basis but to prevent the possibility of Britain siding with the confederates 2. He was a strong believer in segregation, to such a degree, he tried to send them to Africa or the west cost like in Oregon/ Washington state. He didn't free people out of the kindness of his heart. And his reconstruction policies were destroyed before they could even have a chance to do anything by a dixiecrat.
To he fair, he only suspended habeas corpus on railways so congress could convene, which, while certainly a dangerous precedent to set, is also understandable given that it protected congress during a rebellion.
Dude general Pope said he was going to personally annihilate the Sioux in Minnesota. Lincoln personally intervened and reduced the number of condemned Indians from over 300 to 38. The 38 who had indiscriminately killed women or children during the uprising.
Yeah, and a lot of the mass executions he is talking about are of Natives who had committed heinous crimes in the name of the confederacy they were allied with
Did LINCOLN suspend Habeas Corpus? The Constitution gives only Congress that power, under Article I, Section 9. This states: “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” Article 1 is explicitly an outlining of Congressional authority. You may go back and research this a little more.
He also viewed blacks as an inferior race and also had a plan to send freed slaves to Haiti. Also, to those trying to justify Lincoln's war efforts, Lincoln started the war. Other European countries negotiated upon ended slavery and compensation for former slave owners. Lincoln went to war using slavery as an excuse to mask the real reason. To establish a tyrannical rule over the country. Sort of explains why Boothe shouted "Sic Temper Tyrannus" (Death to tyrants) before shooting him.
#1 he was going to send the slaves back to africa, specifically a colony in Liberia. #2 the south started the war by firing shot at fort Sumter. No amount of, "he goaded them into it" will ever change this fact. #3 the south left the union before Lincoln was even inaugurated. As a matter of fact Jefferson Davis was inaugurated before Lincoln. They left because someone who said many times "I do not want to free the slaves," took office. Do you really think they wouldve negotiated a peaceful end to slavery? They were even promised constitutional protection for slavery where it already existed, and they said no because they werent guaranteed the ability to spread slavery to new states. #4 as a matter of fact no, Lincoln didnt fight the war to end slavery. As he said many times, including the greely letter, he fought to preserve the union in anyway he could.
@@robertmonroe7930Ignoring that the South only fired on Ft Sumter because the armed Union soldiers refused to leave and that armed Union warships were sent to further reinforce it. They already tried to peacefully negotiate an end to slavery multiple times. I don't recall the Confederates desiring to spread slavery, merely that each state should be allowed to choose. Given that the Confederate Constitution expressly forbade the further importation of slaves, it stands to reason that they didn't desire that at all.
@dethblade4836 very off-base. #1 fort Sumter was built by the state of South Carolina but the deed was shortly thereafter given to the United States. It was not property that they owned. The US should be able to resupply a fort they rightfully own. #2 The confederacy absolutely and unequivocally wanted to spread slavery. They had plans to invade Mexico and other Latin American countries after the Civil War if they succeeded at fighting the US. Banning the importation of slaves was overall good for the plantation owners because the slaves were a lot more expensive and they could (as horrible as it was) breed them to make more to sell at auction. Its the whole reason they rejected the Crittenden Compromise. The US was ready to give them the constitutional guarantee to the right to own slaves but it was rejected because it specifically only allowed slavery in States where it was already legal.
1. Gorge Washington 2. Abraham Lincoln 3. Jhon F. Kennedy 4. Franklin D. Roosevelt 5. George W. Bush I don’t know who is greater or greatest, but they r the most famous American President across the whole globe at least as an Asian I can confirm that.
@@randomtraveler9854 Bro. plz read my full comment. I made this list only regarding their popularity and their legacy in world's history. Especially if we talk about George W Bush he is 21st century's one of most influential and controversial figure. I mean his declaration of "War on Terror" change the game forever.💀Atleast as a Muslim (confused) I can confirm that.
i can understand 1 and 2, in every single revolution and civil war often times these policies must be implemented to maintain stability in crisis. the third one on the other hand, well, uh-
I didn’t notice but it does explain why he isn’t on your top 10 list, thank you for sharing. I still think Lincoln was one of the best presidents we have had and to be fair no president in history was perfect.
Now hold on for a moment, because I've been there. I used to love those spicy takes, that are so true, but the rest of the population are indoctrinated sheeps. But then I did my own research and guess what... I discovered that those same guys that were "redpilling" me were lying to me. Rageaholic lies in that video Lincoln. It's not because you are stupid. It's because he is a grifter. They all are. They hope you will not check what they are saying because it sounds nice, or cool or edgy. But it will get better. Whatever dark stuff you are going in life will get better. You will get better.
@@andrewtc95 He absolutely was. Ive seen vlogging's videos, and they in every way fail to retort Rage's video. Its exact proof to never make an unscripted response. He fails to make a good excuse for the suspending of corpus, the draconian response to draft riots, the war crimes of Sherman including against slvs, the arrest of thousands of political opponents, and more. He instead tends to straw man and is a master of rambling without making a point. You can visibly and audibly hear him struggle to come up with excuses. Lincoln was a tyrant, he oppressed Natives, and theres a good reason native protestors defiled his statue
@@ManiacMayhem7256 He was fighting a rebellion. No other president had to deal with the issue on the same scale so OF COURSE he had looks like a tyrant in comparison. Did he overreach with his power? Maybe. But that's nothing uniquely evil. The question of Federal control limitations is as old as America itself. Had Lincoln been too lenient towards opponents of the war effort he might have not been able to hold the nation together. These weren't easy decisions with clear clean-cut answers. Vlogging perfectly explained why Sherman abandoned the slaves in that one battle. There simply was no better option. I don't see what else needs said. Lincoln wasn't exceptionally cruel with Native Americans. In fact, on one occasion he saved many from execution despite the fact it may have cost him votes. Also, Lincoln the "tyrant" was the one repeatedly calling for the Southern states to stay in the Union while affirming the limitations of his power as president. As he said in his first inaugural address, the monumental issue of Civil War was in the South's hands.
@@andrewtc95 George Washington did, and he violated less human rights and his own values far less than Lincoln did. It ain't a maybe that Lincoln was a tyrant, it's a definite. Arresting any and all dissidents, implementing a draft rich people can dodge but the poor cannot, persecuting natives, the works. He could've won the war without doing this, as all these actions only worsened criticism of him. Streisand effect. "He needed to hold the nation together" I despise the CSA but the world would've been better had USA balkanized. No Vietnam War, no Iraq War, no drug war, no CIA toppling of governments around the world. Lincoln sought to preserve capitalist power and US imperialism. There's no excuse persecuting dissidents. Wilson and Bush did the same thing and we condemn them. Vlogging's excuse was poor, and seemingly never ponders "hey instead of leaving the slaves to die, doing war crimes against slaves as well as making another group feel so helpless they jumped in a river, he could've at the very least tell them to go north like abolitionists had been doing for decades" He ran the biggest mass execution of natives in US history and signed away millions of acres of their land. He was criticized for it even at the time. Your distortion of history is easily exposed. He didn't pardon these men, not in the traditional sense, he simply changed their sentences from a death penalty to imprisonment. They still faced their unjust sentences by the hands of the US government. There's a reason native protestors recently defiled his statue. "Affirming the limitations of his own power" and contradicting that statement at every turn. Lincoln was a tyrant, and he was put in office by capitalists who wished to preserve and expand their industrial institutions. They were scared that the small scale rebellions of Nat Turner and the like would expand to anti capitalism, so they needed a war to make things more favorable for them. Slavery didn't end after Lincoln btw. See Knowing Better's video on neoslavery. Howard Zinn, a Marxist, proves my points on Lincoln
@@salutic.7544 being "legal" just proves the law is bad. all you need to have happen is someone declare something wartime and you've got a despot on your hands case and point Canada and Mr. I'm going to call a peaceful protest an emergancy and use wartime measures to for them to disperse.
@@DarthVader_1977 Still doesn’t make it right that Presidents can “suspend” your civil rights. If your “rights” can be written away by somebody, they’re not rights just privileges.
The suspension of Habeus Corpus is clearly permitted in the constitution in the case of a crisis, particularly a rebellion. Insane to me that this is seen as a “Gotcha Lincoln!” argument. The first point while true, was done to keep support for the war going. If he lost support for the war, it would have damned all those living in bondage in the south to a lifetime of slavery and severely weakened the union and states that seceded. Remember that the Confederacy just needed to fight until the North lost the will for the war, and the war was extremely unpopular at first (even though the traitors shot first). It was a drastic measure but it was also a time of unprecedented crisis in the country. The third point is the only one I consider fair, but even here it must be said that the man was dealing with a extreme crisis of national security. During times like this it is common for governments to make a show of force to potential threats to illustrate they are not an easy target. We did the same thing after Pearl Harbor and 9/11. All of this is not even considering the personal struggles this man went though. He saw our nation through it’s very darkest hour AND cured us of our original sin. The worst thing this nation has ever done was categorically terminated by way of constitutional amendment. He lost his youngest son to illness during his presidency, and even when buried in grief and unimaginable stress, he knew he had a responsibility to the American people to put that aside and lead. He was a man of incredible strength and willpower, a brilliant politician and orator, and a champion of equality. And at the end of it all, he was thanked with a bullet to the back of his head. I understand if he’s not your favorite, but it seems self evident to me that he is the greatest American president.
Hard times and tough decisions make great men. I really do think Lincoln pulled the trigger to end slavery in America. And I’ll disagree with Mr. Beat, he and Washington are tied. Nope, scratch that. Abe takes the cake. I can just think of so many things he did that resulted from his heart. Just like the men in ww2, losing wasn’t a option.
Personally I view the first one as part of his political genius. In times of war you do some bad and ugly things to win, but that may be one of my few radical beliefs.
@@iammrbeat Tbf, it is in the Constitution-Section 1 Article 9: “…Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, *unless* when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it” (emphasis my own) The Habeas Corpus Suspension Act of 1863 backs this up by further authorizing the president to do so.
@@iammrbeat Probably, but that’s irrelevant to this discussion isn’t it? In absence of a contradicting decision from the Supreme Court it would remain the law of the land (especially in the time frame under question). Either way, while I too believe it is unconstitutional, you’d have a heck of a time making that argument legally-you’d essentially have to argue Congress doesn’t have the power to legislate some of its assumed powers.
When he suspended habeas corpus the first time, it was to protect the railroads so members of Congress could get to washington. When he did it the second time, he had Congress’s full support
When it comes to #1 and #2, this is a right that tends to go out the window during any civil war, let alone during most regular conflicts. Its hard to hit Lincoln with a fair enough penalty considering that those are fairly normal consequences in those circumstances. #3 pretty rough though ngl
Not to mention he gets all the credit for ending slavery when the 13th was passed after he died. The emancipation proclamation was an empty gesture that only freed slaves in states that he wasn’t in control of, to turn the war into a moral war against slavery. It worked tho
He was going to sign the Emancipation Proclamation even later than he did, the only reason he signed it so early was because Cassius Clay forced him into signing it
Definitely think that Lincoln, FDR, and Reagan (Usually one or more is in a top 10 list) are way overrated if you look past things that were out of there direct control (Civil War, WW2, and 80s economic boom)
@@ErinS06 Considering how homophobic the Republican Party is, I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if Reagan intentionally mishandled the AIDS epidemic. He probably saw it as a way to get rid of homosexuals without directly opening a concentration camp for them.
Lincoln violated peoples rights waaaay too many times to have a real claim to a top ten. The standards of presidents are pretty low so i could understand a ranking of 15-20
To be fair, when your entire country is killing itself and law and order has been thrown out the window, the first amendment has to get stepped on to some regard
They didn't "own" those slaves the banks did hence why they coudlnd't free them in the way we all expect them too certainly easier pill to swallow then Abe voting against anti slavery bills when he still held office in his home state of Illinois
And he was also a vampire slayer that prolly killed off the last remaining few vampires there’s a documentary about it I believe it’s called Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter it’s pretty good released back in 2012 most of the documentary shows a reenactment
Am I wrong?
Hey, correct me if I'm wrong Mr. Beat because I'm Scottish but I'm pretty sure at least with the second one, habeas corpus was allowed be suspended in a time of war or rebellion such as the civil war, which was within Lincoln's powers. Plus the Confederate states did it more than the Union.
Yes😔
All three of these things should have been explored in APUSH but weren’t.
@@thescrout9831 sure he was legally allowed to do it, but that doesn’t mean he should have. A whole bunch of bad stuff could have been avoided by keeping it in place
what was that war he won and the people he freed? kind of takes precedence over those other things you mention.
Lincoln been real quiet since this dropped
Oh he been real quite alright
Heard he went to a theatre to get over with this
Yes
@@abrahamlincoln6388 How was the show at Fords Theatre
@@Polavianus It was good until John Wilkes Booth ki!led me :(
"Hey, it's war baby, what are you going to do?" -Abraham Lincoln Oversimplified
Fr
@@abunchofrandomgarbage23now say it with me... It's! A! Joke!!!!
Underrated comment
It is what it is
It really wasn't a war. It was basically a glorified looting expedition, with murder and arson, a way of life. The Yankees would steal anything that wasn't bolted down, and if it was too heavy to carry away, they would just burn it.
But he fought the vampires for us 😧
That’s why I respect him man managed to stop the confederate vampires basically single-handily using only his trusty wood cutting axe he was built different
I know that you're joking, but I once got insulted as being 'out of touch with reality' for an answer to a question regarding that, even though I literally began that answer by noting in a disclaimer that the entire book was historical fiction.
What'd that prick expect me to do, ask him if he fabricated his description of 'ex-CIA' and compose music about how I would love to kill a certain malignant narcissist in all sorts of ways that would horrify the most hardened of war criminals!?
Just wanna point out not all of us are confederates
and Zombies too
@@JustSomeKittenwithaGun not all of who?
If I remember correctly, one of his last actions was giving the territory of future Las Vegas to Nevada instead of Arizona, and as an Arizonan this is tragic.
I actually didn't know about that!
Didn't expect to see you here
I mean hey, c'mon, it is LITERALLY all Nevada has.
Yeah but thing about it this way, Las Vegas IS Nevada
If he didn't do that then Las Vegas would have ended up being as boring as Arizona.
You have seen Dark Brandon, but wait until you learn of *Dark Lincoln*
lol
I like that😈👻
“Jefferson Davis never told you the truth about Lincoln”
“He told me enough, he told me he was a Tyrant!”
“No Johnny, *Davis* was a tyrant.”
“That’s not true…that’s impossible!“
“Check your facts Johnny; you know it to be true”
“NOOoOOoO!”
Dark *Bradon* 😂
@@warlordofbritannia This sounds like an Atun Shei bit.
#3 could apply to almost every president, and #1 & #2... well, to quote Oversimplified - "Hey, it's war, baby. What are you gonna do?"
I agree, with you on #3. I agree with Mr. Beat on #1 and #2 even though I usually don't agree with him on many things. History is fascinating, different viewpoints even more so
@@malcolmferguson4869 A: Lincoln was especially bad for the Indians B: war isn't an excuse to violate the human rights of your citizenry
War does not justify human rights violations.
Suspensions of civil liberties are sometimes necessary so that your enemy won't take advantage of it@@Salem94-x7m
@@Salem94-x7mthat's a stretch
Oh😔
I'm so sorry 😞 You're still Top 10 though
Your parents had a crush on you
Don’t worry Abraham Lincoln. I feel the same way. 😔
@@abrahamlincoln937 we have an imposter amogus 📮
Poor wise abe
In Lincoln's defense, almost EVERY President was bad for the Native Americans.
They were defeated peoples. They are lucky the US didn't straight up eliminate them in their entirety.
😢 as an Indian 🇮🇳
I am feeling bad for Indians 🇺🇲
That's not a defense of Lincoln, dude.
@@Prabhsinghsandhuthey aren’t Indians
@@gehhko8249yea
It is constitutional to suspend habeas corpus during times of invasion or rebellion. Can’t justify the first and third point tho
That said.
Just about every American president has fucked over the natives.
Well yea you can with the third. The native weren't a harmonious , peaceful collection of tribes.
@@kenw2225
Yeah, and the tribes stole land from amongst each other all of the time with wars and massacres.
Why is it only wrong when American forces ask them to leave with guns drawn?
_“You guys got guns and horses while we only got tomahawks and spears. That’s cheating!”_ 😡
@@kenw2225 yeah right man, Lincoln ignored the active genocide happening in his nation. He took millions of acres of land from them, broke treaties. You can admire the men who built this country without ignoring their atrocities.
And fr, what president was actually good for native americas?
The people who were arrested were actually vampires, he was doing us all a favour and he's not even your no.1 favourite
Lincoln's biography says ALL Confederate soldiers were vampires. Which is why the White House silver disappeared in 1863. Just saying.😏
You still need just and fair trials no matter how bad
@@Goldenroses930 People in power don't really give a rat's pstootie about due process.
@@Goldenroses930 They were Vampires man, they don't need fair trials. They would've eaten the balif.
@@MonsieurFeshe everybody needs a fair trial regardless of someone’s opinion on their person
On the Native American executions- The most famous of them was the “Dakota 38”, so-called because 38 men were hung on December 26, 1862. This was at the end of the “Dakota War”, which had begun over some delayed payments that government agents had promised and suspicions of corruption from said agents. The commissioner of affairs for the Dakota agents, George Day, wrote to Lincoln in January of 1862 and said that: “I have discovered numerous violations of law & many frauds committed by past Agents & a superintendent. I think I can establish frauds to the amount from 20 to 100 thousand dollars & satisfy any reasonable intelligent man that the indians whom I have visited in this state & Wisconsin have been defrauded of more than 100 thousand dollars in or during the four years past.” In August, some settlers were killed by Dakota natives, its unsure why. It should be noted that not all of the Dakota went to war, only a specific faction. After some back and forth, the natives lost and were put on “trial”, although many modern historians and even contemporary officials in Lincoln's administration asserted that there were trumped up charges and falsities-it was more of a formality than a real trial. The secretary of the navy, Gideon Welles, wrote that "I was disgusted with the whole thing; the tone and opinions of the dispatch are discreditable…what may have been the provocation we are not told.”
Lincoln ordered a stay of execution until he could review the trials himself, which was delivered to the troops on October 17. Obviously, since this was happening out West, it took time for information and instructions to go back and forth. 303 Dakota men were indicted and prepared to be executed, and Lincoln faced intense political pressure to give it the go-ahead. He was warned numerous times that if he didn't riotous and angry settlers would carry out mass murders anyway. From newspapers to the highest levels of the Senate, people of all social orders had demanded the executions. Alexander Ramsey, the Governor of Minnesota, wrote to him urging the executions to be approved. "I hope the execution of every Sioux Indian condemned by the military court will be at once ordered...[i]t would be wrong upon principle and policy to refuse this. Private revenge would on all this border take the place of official judgment on these Indians."
Eventually, Lincoln commuted the executions of 265 men, allowing for 39 to still go ahead. In a message to the Senate that December, Lincoln said "Anxious to not act with so much clemency as to encourage another outbreak on the one hand, nor with so much severity as to be real cruelty on the other, I caused a careful examination of the records of trials to be made, in view of first ordering the execution of such as had been proved guilty of violating females.”
Lincoln further tried to make a distinction between 'battles' and 'massacres', justifying the commuting of further sentencing as only 2 men could be proven guilt of rape. After more evidence was reviewed, 38 men were executed.
All in all, I don't think Lincoln should be entirely excused from every controversial decision just because he is revered by many (including me). But it is important to understand that his political pragmatism undergirded basically every decision he made as President up until 1865.
how much of that was written by chat gpt?
@@Connor_Califf It doesn't read like chatGPT to me. It's not full of fluff, it quotes real documents and people and it has an overall point.
@@Connor_Califf there are amateur historians that can write their own stuff, Connor. Try it sometime.
@@lt3746 well said, I agree
Ya. I agree, but 99.9% of the indoctrinated snowflakes. After reading what you said 5 times. Haven’t a clue what you just said.
Probably to your benefit or their delicate sensitivity’s would get it deleted. Factual as it is.
The context of the times 🤷♀️
Glad there’s someone as big as you talking about Lincoln’s flaws. Not many scrape past the surface level “the good guys win every war” propaganda they were taught in schools.
love to see Mr. beat reping the pink floyd merch
Glad you caught that!
@@iammrbeat mr breast give me money
I much prefer the Wall or Animals, but Dsotm is still good.
@@seaacow6347My favorite is Division Bell. PF without Waters is best PF.
As a Minnesotan, the massacre of 38 Dakota warriors after the Dakota War of 1862 was originally supposed to be 300, Lincoln decreased the number to 38. Though I can’t attest to his other actions that could be considered negative against natives
Just a quick note on Lincoln suspending Habeas Corpus- at the start of the war he only suspended it along railway lines so Congress could actually get to DC and convene. And when he did suspend it for the entire country in 1863, he did it with full congressional approval.
I hate how Mr. Beat did not mention this point. But it’s was a pretty short video which in my opinion is makes it bad especially in a topic like this where someone who is going to watch this will get a pretty simple explanation with no added reasons, details and events and have their mind made up on this topic.
There’s already so many misinformation being spread here in the comments knowingly or unknowingly
Yeah , just like the mainstream media always seems to leave out specific points as they are spinning their yarns ! Where’s Paul Harvey when you need him to give us …. “ The rest of the Story “ 🤷🏽♂️
@@greggs12315That is why complex topics need to be given serious time to address a serious and complex issue. Davis and the CSA did far worse by suspending Habeas corpus and using that to declare martial law, for 3 years.
@@greggs12315yeah, Mr Beat also failed to mention that most of the Natives who were killed by his troops were fighting for the traitors at the time
The first two can be partially explained away cuz he was in a civil war so I don't mind him too much for that. But yeh the Native American one, that's a totally and completely valid criticism, i think
ignoring the first amendment is evil and unjustifiable. it's the most important human right.
@@supercringeteam6666 He did what he had to do. Can’t really change or do anything about it now, can we? 🤷🏼♂️
But this is also why I am horrified by martial law. During times of chaos, the President's power should still be checked. It can be a slippery slope to a dictatorship.
@@iammrbeat Wasn't it mostly just along the main railways & telegraph lines? Because we have plenty of examples of papers in New York and the like decrying how Lincoln waged the war.
I feel like the native american one wasnt all that different from other presidents of the time, not an excuse but certainly not a reason to exclude Lincoln for that. Just my opinion though, if anyone has more information I'd be happy to read it
Proves that there’s no such thing as the perfect president.
Maybe we should really have two separate rankings: positive accomplishments and negative accomplishments, rather than one ranking of net effect. LBJ and Nixon would rank pretty high on both lists, I'd imagine.
Yeah,Nixon gets its bad when comes to president's, but I like Nixon , we should remember more than Watergate
@@everettatwater2939 Like normalizing relations with Communist China, essentially saving them from imploding and losing the US' Industrial Manufacturing power?
I would put FDR on the negative list for his gold theft.
@@everettatwater2939 correct me if im wrong here but didnt nixon also start the drug war? its generally seen as a disaster which actually increased drug use and violence within the us
Whah . . . Interesting how you have to find a way to make him seem not so bad 🤔
#3 Is certainly correct, but some historians like to point out that Lincoln actually pardoned a whole 265 Native Americans at the mass hanging you picture at 0:47 (Making the largest mass execution on U.S. soil not 303 people, but 38.)
Not pardoned, just lesser sentences than execution
Daaaang, you got me on this one. Really good job critically thinking about this and calling out my cherry picking fallacy
Too little too late, especially for the 38. Lincoln was a bad man in general. Him signing away tons of Native territory only makes matters worse.
@@ManiacMayhem7256 a bad man? Just tell us you haven’t read anything without telling us.
@@rcr-zt4of
I've read Battle Cry of Freedom. An academic book on the matter.
See too many people ignore the downright unconstitutional things Abe did and got away with
Damn. Totally valid reasons I didn't even know of. Thanks Mr Beat for making us all more informed people
Another thing that dampens his reputation in my eyes is that the emancipation proclamation effectively freed nobody. He had no control over the south so they obviously didn’t listen to it, and the border states (Maryland, Kentucky, Missouri) were all allowed to keep their slaves throughout the war while staying in the union. I mean maryland is right next to DC, Lincoln literally had to pass by slavery very often in his own country while waging war against the south.
@@ryanash4681 They couldn't afford losing the border states, especially since that would have left D.C. completely surrounded by the confederacy.
@@wta1518 I agree. Lincoln always said his priority was preservation of the union. It makes me wonder how his presidency would’ve played out if the south didn’t decide to secede before he even took office.
I hope you do understand Lincoln had arrested many people because the Maryland Governor and majority of the State assembly wanted to secede. And Lincoln did express wanting to reform Indian affairs, of course something else happened
@@ryanash4681 Yea it was a war measure, it allowed the army to free people in the south. Lincoln didn’t want to piss off the northern states which were still in the Union.
I find these somewhat excusable in the context of him having to deal with a grisly conflict that’s tearing the country apart. You can’t assess Lincoln the same as a Monroe or Clinton.
Fair point
i can’t really look past the abuses of native americans though
@@basilmetroulas4622 uhh native americans were already doing human sacrifices and enslaving each other soo
@@thisguy6177 does that make it okay to approve mass executions of them and forcibly sell their land?
@@basilmetroulas4622 you are 100% right. But I can’t think of a president who did more for the country while in office.
The thing about Habeas Corpus is that there were circumstances where the government _could_ suspend it, but bare minimum it needed Congressional approval, which Lincoln didn't seek before suspending it (probably because he knew he wouldn't get it).
On top of that, Lincoln also mishandled the secession crisis once in office. Remember, at the time of his swearing in the Upper South hadn't seceded yet. They wouldn't secede until Lincoln called up the state militias to crush the secessionist states.
Had he handled the situation better he could've potentially avoided at least some if not most (possibly even all) of the Upper South from seceding and maybe even could've succeeded in negotiating a peaceful end to the crisis. The Deep South could've been brought back in with time and effort.
Thank you for comment. Way too many sheep in this comment section.
This video demonstrates one of the flaws in our educational system: we romanticize our national heroes to the point of depicting them as flawless. Thank you, Mr. Beat, for showing me a fuller, realistic picture of Abraham Lincoln.
Nobody said he was flawless. It’s just ridiculous to act like he’s not a great president all because of the huge important scandal of locking up confederates during a time of civil war🤣🤣what a horrible thing he did by locking up traitors to the nation
That's what happens when you let the government run your education system.
That's not what's wrong with the education system, what's wrong with it is the government is involved. Lincoln is a good president and should be highly regarded, but he was not an evil man.
@@spookyfool No one said AL was evil.
@@seekinggodfirst754 I'm guessing you never been to the South. (Joke)
The grandson of Francis Scott Key, Francis Key Howard, the editor of the Baltimore Exchange, was arrested for writing against Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus. He was imprisoned at Ft McHenry 47 years after his grandfather had witnessed the bombardment of that same fort by the British and compelling Francis Scott Key to write the words which would later be sung in our national anthem.
Francis Key Howard later wrote about his ordeal in the book, 'Fourteen Months in American Bastilles.'
That's wild. Just curious, what lines written by Key have since been dropped from the song?
@@r.j.macready I don't know. I do know the song has 4 stanzas, which happens to be my username.
Either it was truly ironic that he was jailed there or some judge had a twisted sense of humor.
God forbid you suspend habeas corpus in the middle of a civil war
But that's making it acceptable to do it. Then what? What else is it okay under? And if it's okay to suspend...then why have it at all, in the first place...just 'most' of the time?
If you appreciate history, why do you call it the Civil War?
He did it BEFORE getting approval from Congress. He broke the law.
The ends do not justify the means, basic ethics 101.
@@noahhyde8769 The Constitution literally allows for it. I'm sorry, but when society breaks down social norms go out the window. Sometimes you got to do what you got to do.
#4: He didn't kick the south's ass hard enough 😎
Chose Andrew Johnson as vp, allowing him to destroy so much of what could have been achieved under Reconstruction before the Radical Republicans managed to stop him.
I will always stand by the north should have razed the south and killed alot more slavers because this, modern America, is what happens when you just let the slavers live and keep all their money and power and expect them to not treat the people they don't think sre people better
There's a reason the southern states are the poorest in the nation
Yeah the raping and pillaging and decades of oppression weren't hard enough for his alleged fellow citizens and brethren lmao
@@billyboy4283 they lacked the industrial power of the coastal states
i loved the nuanced take on this.
Yeah, I disagree with Mr Beat still but I get *why* he slightly disfavors Lincoln
To me, his greatest accomplishments (emancipation and keeping the country together) is enough to outweigh the above to the degree I still have him as Number 1
@@warlordofbritanniathen you dont really know about Lincoln. you should do some research, he was a very bad guy.
So, we just gonna forget the first two were during the civil war?
Doesn't matter.
@@ChrisKimbro-k7zwell no, it does, especially when your comparing it to peace time presidents
@@kelpermoon23 civil war is no reason to violate the constitution. In fact, he's fighting the civil war to uphold the constitution, it would be really hypocritical to violate it at the same time
@@lik7953 Civil war is actually a pretty big reason, which is why I think it’s unfair…
@@kelpermoon23 Disagree. There is no situation in which any government actor or group of government actors has any authority to violate the Bill of Rights. If you are aware or such authority, which would have to be described in the Constitution (including the amendments), your instruction would be most appreciated.
Though I see your points and reasoning (and respect you for sharing your opinion on this), I still think he was a very good president. But thanks to you, I will look at Lincoln with a more complete view. And it's okay that you don't think he was the best. At the end of the day, we are all people and are entitled to our own opinions.
For what it's worth, I still think he was a very good president as well. :)
He literally committed genocide. He's Hitler.
I think he was pretty bad
I think Daniel Day Lewis was ass portraying Lincoln, I didn't buy it, the movie was ass too
@@ManiacMayhem7256well at least he was better than Davis at the time
It’s okay, Mr. Beat. Even though I’m not your favorite president, I am still a huge fan of your UA-cam channel nonetheless.
He also didn't want to ban slavery until he was worried that European powers might get involved on the side of the confederacy, so he pledged to outlaw slavery if the Union would win therefore Europe stayed out of it.
He wanted slavery banned but didnt think it was the right time. He preferred a slower route of starving the institution out by refusing its expansion.
Many factors involved with Emancipation. It was doubtful that anyone would actually go to war. Not cost-effective.
Idk if you can change the title on shorts but I think “Why I hate Abraham Lincoln” would appeal to a wider audience. Great video!
Thanks for the suggestion. I changed it to "Why Abraham Lincoln is not the Greatest President"
@Jar Jar Binks That's the point, views.
@Jar Jar Binks reminded me of when JJ McCullough talked about why he hates Wilipedia
Fair enough. I mean, sure Lincoln had his problems. Every President has (In fact I dare Mr Beat to say one thing about George Washington he disagrees with). But in the end, he still led the country through the civil war, preserved the Union, and deserves a lot of the credit for ending slavery, even if he was initially a moderate on the issue.
I think people were also confused as to why FDR wasn’t on that list.
Perhaps I will make the FDR video next then! Oh, and I do have criticisms about Washington. I laid them out in my video about him, albeit briefly.
@@iammrbeat FDR was pure trash
@@TheSpiritof1861 just like all US Presidents except JFK
@@Bobbythrasher69 lol
Don't apologize. You are being honest in your evaluation of the presidents. We need more people who will be completely honest when it comes to who their favorites are, and when it comes to all history, not just ours or theirs.
I have zero problem with what you said.
Will, I guess I just learned something new
Press is free.
Boston media people. Like me.
Page 1 US HISTORY.
FakeNewZ was sent everywhere.
Two men wanted it. They didnt get it.
“Keep your information out your god dam mouth!”
-Will Smith
He also didint see black people as equal to whites he beleved that slavery was bad but he thought whites were superior
Those three things make me want to dig deeper to know why it was done. What was the logic or reasoning. Moreover, how much of it is true?
I do think it's hard to argue Lincoln wasn't the greatest president in terms of sheer political ability.
True
Yea, reading about how he went from like one term as a US representative to President was a trip lol. To say nothing of all the political bullsh*t he had to deal with during his actual presidency. Lyndon B. Johnson was pretty talented at that too
That's no way to measure greatness in a real sense, especially in what is supposed to be democratic countries. In the same breath you could utter that most of the 20th century dictators were the greatest politicians ever. Lincoln was a tyrant, just like any political actor would be in his position, wars are terrible things for freedom. I am an Englishman, and I know for Americans, Lincoln is a hero on many levels. I have seen American media present him as a saint. In my perspective, if I'm to compare him to a great British politician, it would be Churchill. Both men faced a war, and both men sent young men to die in pointless battles during said war. I will say this, both men made the situation worse then it should have been, and if they did nothing in response to the wars, the world would be a much better place today. It's a hard thing to swallow but, I cannot find it to be untrue. Lincoln should have let the south be subjected to the huge slave population when they inevitably have had enough. Churchill should have not given the political power to Hitler to wage his total war.
A genius in that respect. Despite these three things, I’m still a huge Lincoln fan, but Mr Beats reasons are tough to argue-but it’s still important we remember the great things he did as well. Washington still the OG, and also Ulysses S Grant is underrated!
@@OuroborosAlchemist I respectfully disagree. Neville Chamberlain who had a philosophy similar to this is what allowed Hitler to grow so powerful in the first place. Sometimes pure democracy is just not the answer to strenuous situations.
Very, very based. It's like nobody is allowed to criticize Lincoln without being called unsavory names
Yes, because to take him out of his Greek temple, his Memorial, would cause a lot of uncomfortable truths about the rationale for pursuing actions that led to over 620,000 dirt naps and the destruction of half the country while doing in the We st. exactly the opposite of what he claimed to be doing in the So. uth
Man was literally thrown head first into a civil war and expected to solve everything, of course not everything would be perfect.
There's not being perfect and then there's war crimes and genocide
To be Fair, he did have to try to return the southern states into the Union, meaning he needed to take Drastic Actions
Did he?
@@AA-bn7tf you think if he said "please join back into the union" the south would return?
@@AA-bn7tf Yes he did. And you know that.
I just don't think he had to take such drastic actions
@@iammrbeat Constitution says that Habeas Corpus can be suspended if there is an invasion or insurrection.
Abraham Lincoln had a terrible Native American policy
Every US president, before and after him, had terrible indigenous policy because America itself only exists because its origins of Europeans ethically cleansing land of the indigenous population and settling people deemed the "right race". The US never be a state for indigenous people because it was explicitly created to exclude them, no matter how much you try to reform and we really haven't, like the government sterilized like 1 in 4 indigenous women in the 70s or 80s. This also applies to Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Israel.
Based
It wasn’t really his Native American policy it was established policy for years but he didn’t change it. Like how Obama and Biden are continuing with deportations and with the broken system of immigration down there we have because they are distracted by other things are this is not enough political points to change it. Although it is worth pointing out that Lincoln asked for changes to the Indian system in his last two state of the union addresses.
Good job Lincoln
@@squid.com8927
Yet he continued it anyways. That makes him an evil man. Theres a good reason his statue was defiled in protests
Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus is specifically allowed in the Constitution, in the event of rebellion or invasion.
What the Constitution does not mention is who can do it. There’s a valid argument for Congress, rather than the President, having that authority.
It's about time somebody said it!
The Legislative Branch Article 1 Section 10 Sub Section 3 Says;
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of Delay.
The fact that Lincoln is only 10th is, and I think Lincoln would agree with me here, mind blowing.
Waiting for the Lincoln Stan's in the comments.
The criticisms that Mr. Beat made are fair. But there’s a reason why Lincoln is always highly rated. Previously Mr. Beat said that if he was looking at it from a technical standpoint and not objective, Lincoln would be along side Washington.
Thanks Rata, and I also think it's important to recognize that I still feel like Lincoln is one of the best
Here
He stopped the vampires he’s a hero in anyone’s book
Thanks for posting this. History books should tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. The version of Lincoln history that I got as a child was like saying “Diddy saw all these individuals that could benefit from his social connections, so he made a lot of introductions that might never have happened without his aid. Countless people remember his famous words `Now, what y'all wanna do? Wanna be ballers, shot callers, brawlers? Who be dippin' in the Benz with the spoilers?’ He changed the lives of a lot of people”. Smh, Leaves too much out. Leaves students thinking “this person was a cool lyricist and benevolent figure”.
Lincoln never went to war to stop slavery, as a matter of fact there's a letter he wrote saying he could care less about them. He was more worried about keeping the country together
Lincoln was morally opposed to slavery and he said so publicly. He was consistently anti-slavery for his entire political career. One letter doesn’t negate an entire career of opposition to slavery.
@@SimonBellaMondo morally opposed to slavery doesn't mean he's anti slavery all together. He still allowed slavery in Union states where slavery was legal for understandable reasons, his emancipation proclamation applied to the 'rebel' states. The civil war for him was more about preserving the union, he just didn't want slavery to expand further.
@@ExPraetorianGuard-dl1pz He had to do that to keep the support of southern states that were on the union side. Lincoln was a strong supporter of the 13th amendment freeing all slaves which passed in December of 1865 the same year he died.
As a cool person once said "The North wasn't always fighting to end slavery. But the south was always fighting to preserve it."
We need free speech even in time of war.
We need to limit the cult speech that divides us and racist language that kill people.
Words like actions have consequences. Bad speech start wars.
Especially during times of war.
A civil war is unique, in that it is people vs people within one nation. The government must necessarily pick one side. Which side is arbitrary, but it must have a clear position. It therefore can treat certain citizens as effectively enemies of the state, and restrict their rights to prevent further harm to the country. FYI, we do this with domestic terrorists, felons etc. Being a threat to the public DOES reduce your rights.
Everyone sucked in the past. This obsession of looking at everything with today lens is an injustice. Keep in mind how miserable Lincoln life was from just serving the public. Lincoln was a miserable man and he took on the full weight of his decisions. Not only did Lincoln keep the country together he was assassinated for his efforts
Can you elaborate on what “mass executions” you’re talking about for point 3? From what I recall, large amounts of warriors were slated to be executed after the Eastern Sioux Massacre, but Lincoln’s influence actually led to far fewer receiving the death penalty
As a matter of fact. Lincoln ordered that no natives should be executed without his approval. Later, Lincoln personally read the case files of the 300 or so charged men to determine if they deserved death. Most of those men were not killed and only around 20 were executed.
@@cornballfungus yeah, I usually love Mr. Beat, but somehow he failed to research this point fully and just bought into a trendy narrative, which is a bit disappointing
@@beachboysandrewI’m amused that you think you’ve debunked something because you found someone else that agrees with you.
@@gravesidepoet5405 it has nothing to do with who agrees with whom, a quick Internet search about the Eastern Sioux Massacre and five minutes of reading would confirm we’re right
@@gravesidepoet5405 he thinks he's debunked it because he trusts the details that "someone else" has brought in, details which do in fact debunk something.
you are SPOT ON, Matt - and you made a big acknowledgement which far outweighs the need for any apology. Once again, I salute you.
Well thanks for understanding. I know this is a controversial one!
I'll also add a few of my issues with Lincoln.
1. He "freed" the slaves not on a humanitarian basis but to prevent the possibility of Britain siding with the confederates
2. He was a strong believer in segregation, to such a degree, he tried to send them to Africa or the west cost like in Oregon/ Washington state.
He didn't free people out of the kindness of his heart. And his reconstruction policies were destroyed before they could even have a chance to do anything by a dixiecrat.
Lincoln is mindblown by this
I’m early on a Mrbeat video
Thanks for being here early :)
To he fair, he only suspended habeas corpus on railways so congress could convene, which, while certainly a dangerous precedent to set, is also understandable given that it protected congress during a rebellion.
First 2 we’re not too bad purely cause of circumstances of the time. The third one isn’t brilliant tho but he is still probably the best US president
I get that argument
Dude general Pope said he was going to personally annihilate the Sioux in Minnesota. Lincoln personally intervened and reduced the number of condemned Indians from over 300 to 38. The 38 who had indiscriminately killed women or children during the uprising.
Thats what i said
Yeah, and a lot of the mass executions he is talking about are of Natives who had committed heinous crimes in the name of the confederacy they were allied with
Did LINCOLN suspend Habeas Corpus? The Constitution gives only Congress that power, under Article I, Section 9.
This states:
“The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”
Article 1 is explicitly an outlining of Congressional authority. You may go back and research this a little more.
He also viewed blacks as an inferior race and also had a plan to send freed slaves to Haiti. Also, to those trying to justify Lincoln's war efforts, Lincoln started the war. Other European countries negotiated upon ended slavery and compensation for former slave owners. Lincoln went to war using slavery as an excuse to mask the real reason. To establish a tyrannical rule over the country. Sort of explains why Boothe shouted "Sic Temper Tyrannus" (Death to tyrants) before shooting him.
#1 he was going to send the slaves back to africa, specifically a colony in Liberia. #2 the south started the war by firing shot at fort Sumter. No amount of, "he goaded them into it" will ever change this fact. #3 the south left the union before Lincoln was even inaugurated. As a matter of fact Jefferson Davis was inaugurated before Lincoln. They left because someone who said many times "I do not want to free the slaves," took office. Do you really think they wouldve negotiated a peaceful end to slavery? They were even promised constitutional protection for slavery where it already existed, and they said no because they werent guaranteed the ability to spread slavery to new states. #4 as a matter of fact no, Lincoln didnt fight the war to end slavery. As he said many times, including the greely letter, he fought to preserve the union in anyway he could.
@@robertmonroe7930Ignoring that the South only fired on Ft Sumter because the armed Union soldiers refused to leave and that armed Union warships were sent to further reinforce it.
They already tried to peacefully negotiate an end to slavery multiple times. I don't recall the Confederates desiring to spread slavery, merely that each state should be allowed to choose. Given that the Confederate Constitution expressly forbade the further importation of slaves, it stands to reason that they didn't desire that at all.
@dethblade4836 very off-base. #1 fort Sumter was built by the state of South Carolina but the deed was shortly thereafter given to the United States. It was not property that they owned. The US should be able to resupply a fort they rightfully own.
#2 The confederacy absolutely and unequivocally wanted to spread slavery. They had plans to invade Mexico and other Latin American countries after the Civil War if they succeeded at fighting the US. Banning the importation of slaves was overall good for the plantation owners because the slaves were a lot more expensive and they could (as horrible as it was) breed them to make more to sell at auction. Its the whole reason they rejected the Crittenden Compromise. The US was ready to give them the constitutional guarantee to the right to own slaves but it was rejected because it specifically only allowed slavery in States where it was already legal.
1. Gorge Washington
2. Abraham Lincoln
3. Jhon F. Kennedy
4. Franklin D. Roosevelt
5. George W. Bush
I don’t know who is greater or greatest, but they r the most famous American President across the whole globe at least as an Asian I can confirm that.
George W Bush? For what?
@@randomtraveler9854 Bro. plz read my full comment.
I made this list only regarding their popularity and their legacy in world's history. Especially if we talk about George W Bush he is 21st century's one of most influential and controversial figure. I mean his declaration of "War on Terror" change the game forever.💀Atleast as a Muslim (confused) I can confirm that.
@@randomtraveler9854for Iraq🇮🇶 war
i can understand 1 and 2, in every single revolution and civil war often times these policies must be implemented to maintain stability in crisis. the third one on the other hand, well, uh-
I didn’t notice but it does explain why he isn’t on your top 10 list, thank you for sharing. I still think Lincoln was one of the best presidents we have had and to be fair no president in history was perfect.
hell, most weren't even decent
There was an hour or so long video by The Rageaholic. Changed everything about Lincoln for me. Man was a tyrant.
Now hold on for a moment, because I've been there. I used to love those spicy takes, that are so true, but the rest of the population are indoctrinated sheeps. But then I did my own research and guess what... I discovered that those same guys that were "redpilling" me were lying to me. Rageaholic lies in that video Lincoln. It's not because you are stupid. It's because he is a grifter. They all are. They hope you will not check what they are saying because it sounds nice, or cool or edgy. But it will get better. Whatever dark stuff you are going in life will get better. You will get better.
Watch Vlogging Through History's response to The Rageaholic. Lincoln wasn't a tyrant.
@@andrewtc95
He absolutely was. Ive seen vlogging's videos, and they in every way fail to retort Rage's video. Its exact proof to never make an unscripted response. He fails to make a good excuse for the suspending of corpus, the draconian response to draft riots, the war crimes of Sherman including against slvs, the arrest of thousands of political opponents, and more. He instead tends to straw man and is a master of rambling without making a point. You can visibly and audibly hear him struggle to come up with excuses. Lincoln was a tyrant, he oppressed Natives, and theres a good reason native protestors defiled his statue
@@ManiacMayhem7256 He was fighting a rebellion. No other president had to deal with the issue on the same scale so OF COURSE he had looks like a tyrant in comparison. Did he overreach with his power? Maybe. But that's nothing uniquely evil. The question of Federal control limitations is as old as America itself. Had Lincoln been too lenient towards opponents of the war effort he might have not been able to hold the nation together. These weren't easy decisions with clear clean-cut answers.
Vlogging perfectly explained why Sherman abandoned the slaves in that one battle. There simply was no better option. I don't see what else needs said.
Lincoln wasn't exceptionally cruel with Native Americans. In fact, on one occasion he saved many from execution despite the fact it may have cost him votes.
Also, Lincoln the "tyrant" was the one repeatedly calling for the Southern states to stay in the Union while affirming the limitations of his power as president. As he said in his first inaugural address, the monumental issue of Civil War was in the South's hands.
@@andrewtc95
George Washington did, and he violated less human rights and his own values far less than Lincoln did. It ain't a maybe that Lincoln was a tyrant, it's a definite. Arresting any and all dissidents, implementing a draft rich people can dodge but the poor cannot, persecuting natives, the works. He could've won the war without doing this, as all these actions only worsened criticism of him. Streisand effect. "He needed to hold the nation together" I despise the CSA but the world would've been better had USA balkanized. No Vietnam War, no Iraq War, no drug war, no CIA toppling of governments around the world. Lincoln sought to preserve capitalist power and US imperialism. There's no excuse persecuting dissidents. Wilson and Bush did the same thing and we condemn them.
Vlogging's excuse was poor, and seemingly never ponders "hey instead of leaving the slaves to die, doing war crimes against slaves as well as making another group feel so helpless they jumped in a river, he could've at the very least tell them to go north like abolitionists had been doing for decades"
He ran the biggest mass execution of natives in US history and signed away millions of acres of their land. He was criticized for it even at the time. Your distortion of history is easily exposed. He didn't pardon these men, not in the traditional sense, he simply changed their sentences from a death penalty to imprisonment. They still faced their unjust sentences by the hands of the US government. There's a reason native protestors recently defiled his statue.
"Affirming the limitations of his own power" and contradicting that statement at every turn. Lincoln was a tyrant, and he was put in office by capitalists who wished to preserve and expand their industrial institutions. They were scared that the small scale rebellions of Nat Turner and the like would expand to anti capitalism, so they needed a war to make things more favorable for them. Slavery didn't end after Lincoln btw. See Knowing Better's video on neoslavery. Howard Zinn, a Marxist, proves my points on Lincoln
In the last thing did you mean he was bad for all Native Americans or just the ones fighting for the Confederacy
#1 it was wartime
#2 it was wartime
#3 what’s new? Typical 19th century American president
Being at war doesn’t give Presidents excuses to violate your rights with unconstitutional policies, and neither do emergencies of any kind.
@@sunshineimperials1600 it’s been upheld as constitutional to suspend some civil liberties during wartime. Schenk v US?
@@salutic.7544 being "legal" just proves the law is bad.
all you need to have happen is someone declare something wartime and you've got a despot on your hands
case and point Canada and Mr. I'm going to call a peaceful protest an emergancy and use wartime measures to for them to disperse.
@@sunshineimperials1600It’s been done many times, by multiple presidents.
@@DarthVader_1977 Still doesn’t make it right that Presidents can “suspend” your civil rights. If your “rights” can be written away by somebody, they’re not rights just privileges.
The suspension of Habeus Corpus is clearly permitted in the constitution in the case of a crisis, particularly a rebellion. Insane to me that this is seen as a “Gotcha Lincoln!” argument.
The first point while true, was done to keep support for the war going. If he lost support for the war, it would have damned all those living in bondage in the south to a lifetime of slavery and severely weakened the union and states that seceded. Remember that the Confederacy just needed to fight until the North lost the will for the war, and the war was extremely unpopular at first (even though the traitors shot first). It was a drastic measure but it was also a time of unprecedented crisis in the country.
The third point is the only one I consider fair, but even here it must be said that the man was dealing with a extreme crisis of national security. During times like this it is common for governments to make a show of force to potential threats to illustrate they are not an easy target. We did the same thing after Pearl Harbor and 9/11.
All of this is not even considering the personal struggles this man went though. He saw our nation through it’s very darkest hour AND cured us of our original sin. The worst thing this nation has ever done was categorically terminated by way of constitutional amendment.
He lost his youngest son to illness during his presidency, and even when buried in grief and unimaginable stress, he knew he had a responsibility to the American people to put that aside and lead.
He was a man of incredible strength and willpower, a brilliant politician and orator, and a champion of equality. And at the end of it all, he was thanked with a bullet to the back of his head.
I understand if he’s not your favorite, but it seems self evident to me that he is the greatest American president.
Hard times and tough decisions make great men. I really do think Lincoln pulled the trigger to end slavery in America. And I’ll disagree with Mr. Beat, he and Washington are tied. Nope, scratch that. Abe takes the cake. I can just think of so many things he did that resulted from his heart. Just like the men in ww2, losing wasn’t a option.
Don’t be sorry. These are great arguments.
Personally I view the first one as part of his political genius. In times of war you do some bad and ugly things to win, but that may be one of my few radical beliefs.
I must concede he was a political genius
I don’t care about those things he saved the Union RAAAAAHHH 🦅 🇺🇸 Lincoln on top 😎
Was there a way to end slavery that didn't infringe on the First Amendment and habeas corpus?
I love how you always give reasoning and express your opinion civilly. If only the world had more Mr. Beats.
All good criticisms.
Also the public sympathy for assassination victims is a factor.
Mr Beat, I thought that the President is allowed to suspend the writ of Habeas Corpus during times of War, yeah?
This is actually debated by legal scholars. In my humble opinion, I think it is unconstitutional.
@@iammrbeat
Tbf, it is in the Constitution-Section 1 Article 9: “…Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, *unless* when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it” (emphasis my own)
The Habeas Corpus Suspension Act of 1863 backs this up by further authorizing the president to do so.
@@warlordofbritannia That law is unconstitutional in my opinion.
@@iammrbeat
Probably, but that’s irrelevant to this discussion isn’t it? In absence of a contradicting decision from the Supreme Court it would remain the law of the land (especially in the time frame under question).
Either way, while I too believe it is unconstitutional, you’d have a heck of a time making that argument legally-you’d essentially have to argue Congress doesn’t have the power to legislate some of its assumed powers.
Wow I wasn’t aware of any of these three things! Thanks Mr. Beat!
I don’t agree with you often, but I completely agree with this.
A time of extreme emergency, none of these measures were meant to be permanent.
nothing more permenant then a temporary governemnt program
Imagine dealing with literal treason and having to answer to someone who wasn't there... 💀 💀 💀
i think James Madison did a much better job of still respecting constitutional rights during war time than Abraham Lincoln did
Who didn’t hate the Native Americans then
When he suspended habeas corpus the first time, it was to protect the railroads so members of Congress could get to washington. When he did it the second time, he had Congress’s full support
When it comes to #1 and #2, this is a right that tends to go out the window during any civil war, let alone during most regular conflicts. Its hard to hit Lincoln with a fair enough penalty considering that those are fairly normal consequences in those circumstances.
#3 pretty rough though ngl
So basically Lincoln was Based?
yeah being a dictator to beat the south is pretty cool
Not to mention he gets all the credit for ending slavery when the 13th was passed after he died. The emancipation proclamation was an empty gesture that only freed slaves in states that he wasn’t in control of, to turn the war into a moral war against slavery. It worked tho
He was going to sign the Emancipation Proclamation even later than he did, the only reason he signed it so early was because Cassius Clay forced him into signing it
Definitely think that Lincoln, FDR, and Reagan (Usually one or more is in a top 10 list) are way overrated if you look past things that were out of there direct control (Civil War, WW2, and 80s economic boom)
I would never put Reagan near the top of my list, because of how he handled other things (namely the AIDS epidemic)
Reagan took our full-autos
@@ErinS06 Considering how homophobic the Republican Party is, I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if Reagan intentionally mishandled the AIDS epidemic. He probably saw it as a way to get rid of homosexuals without directly opening a concentration camp for them.
@@AA-bn7tf the one good thing he did
Reagan is my second least favorite president, second only to Andrew Jackson.
And thus: sic semper tyranus
I now understand why people don’t like Lincoln damn
Lincoln violated peoples rights waaaay too many times to have a real claim to a top ten. The standards of presidents are pretty low so i could understand a ranking of 15-20
To be fair, when your entire country is killing itself and law and order has been thrown out the window, the first amendment has to get stepped on to some regard
Yoo congrats Mr Beast on 200 subscriber 👍
Nobody's perfect like how Jefferson and Washington were both slave owners
They didn't "own" those slaves the banks did hence why they coudlnd't free them in the way we all expect them too
certainly easier pill to swallow then Abe voting against anti slavery bills when he still held office in his home state of Illinois
And he was also a vampire slayer that prolly killed off the last remaining few vampires there’s a documentary about it I believe it’s called Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter it’s pretty good released back in 2012 most of the documentary shows a reenactment
@@Grabthembypussycat That movie sucks. I liked it as a kid, before I realised it was some anti-vampiric propaganda.
Can't commend you enough for this -- thank you! And thank you for leaving a couple of items out I figured you'd include.
Ultimately, his good out weighed the bad. No President was flawless.
Screw Lincoln, I m all about Thomas Jefferson.
Why not Jefferson Davis? :D
@@AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA4AAAAAAAAAAAAA the Pandora's box shall not me opened by me nor under my comment
@@AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA4AAAAAAAAAAAAA Because fuck him, that’s why
Now now now....Jefferson clearly had his faults, too
It’s a good thing Thomas Jefferson is completely unproblematic…
*just don’t look up what he was doing with his dead wife’s slave half sister*
I love how well you do your homework Mr.Beat! Ty friend.