Thanks for asking the question😊 Ans- As every group has Only one identity element and these are Subgroups of this group so the identity element is common.
Because she made a mistake on assuming all “p-SSG” has prime order, forgetting the p here indicates the group has order of a power of p, not that group has prime order.
@@dr.upasanapahujataneja1707 by this you are claiming 8 is a prime number, again, “2-SSG” is a group with order being powers of 2, in this video every 2-SSG has order 8, by no ways you can restrict it to just a cyclic subgroup or order 8.
Mam, here in 2-SSG order is 2 1 is identity common in all H1,.....H7 and rest contains one more element in total 1+7 = 8 (you took 48 here) And 7 SSG is 48 In total giving 56 which divides 56 Am I right ????
This prove fails at 7:49 here the number of “2-SSG” is 7 and number of elements in every “2-SSG” is 8, we know nothing about these subgroups of order 8 and you just assumes they are all isomorphic to cyclic group of order 8 and trivially intersects. THIS IS SIMPLY FALSE. The same problem arises multiple times in your videos, and you have refused to address this issue.
NICELY EXPLAINED MA'AM
Very nice explanation mam 😊
thank you!
1lk
Beautifully explained
Thank you❤🌹 so much mam
Beautifully explained, Ma'am, thank you so much
Mam,why are you take such as n1,n7 .which method ,please explain
Nyc Explanation🎉🎉
Mam isme jo 7 or 8 order ka group h Usme common elements bi to ho sakte h
Muchas gracias. Saludos desde México.
Ma'am if last condition was hold then will what??
Good presentation my friend
Mam Kya sirf identity common ha or koi elements common nahi Ho sakta.
Thank you mam for this presentation, it is so helpful.
Many Thanks....please refer to other Videos of modern Algebra and real analysis...
Thanks mam 🙏🙏🙏
Thank you
Very nice explanation mam❤
Thanks di
Mam pls make a video on group of order 30 .
What will be the cases?
Ma'am why there is only identity element common between two p-ssg?
Thanks for asking the question😊
Ans- As every group has Only one identity element and these are Subgroups of this group so the identity element is common.
@@dr.upasanapahujataneja1707 the question here is not why identity is a common element between two p-ssg, but the “only common”.
Because she made a mistake on assuming all “p-SSG” has prime order, forgetting the p here indicates the group has order of a power of p, not that group has prime order.
Thank You so much ma'am!!😭
You are so welcome!
Keep watching
Thank you so much ma'am
Thank you 😊
@@dr.upasanapahujataneja1707 Ma'am is it possible to personally contact with you ??
Mail me at upasna.pahuja@gmail.com
@@dr.upasanapahujataneja1707 okk thank you ma'am
thanks mam
Most welcome 😊
Thank you mam
Mam there can b more elements common in two Sylow p subgroups...why are we taking only identity element in intersection?
They Will not have any element common other than identity as they are groups of prime order...
@@dr.upasanapahujataneja1707 by this you are claiming 8 is a prime number, again, “2-SSG” is a group with order being powers of 2, in this video every 2-SSG has order 8, by no ways you can restrict it to just a cyclic subgroup or order 8.
Please make a video on "group of order 120 is not simple"
Hii..have u ans for tiz question?? Explain it..
Mam, here in 2-SSG order is 2
1 is identity common in all H1,.....H7 and rest contains one more element in total 1+7 = 8 (you took 48 here)
And 7 SSG is 48
In total giving 56 which divides 56
Am I right ????
The order of 2-ssg is not 2. It is 2^3 = 8
Very usefull
Thank you...😊
Mam ssg ki full form btana
Sylow subgroup
Mam in case of group of order 30,
n2 = 1,3,5,15
n3 = 1,10
n5= 1,6
Now how to proceed further?
What will be the different cases?
Is (1, 2) a simple group ?
Write me on mathsclasses87@gmail.com
This prove fails at 7:49 here the number of “2-SSG” is 7 and number of elements in every “2-SSG” is 8, we know nothing about these subgroups of order 8 and you just assumes they are all isomorphic to cyclic group of order 8 and trivially intersects. THIS IS SIMPLY FALSE. The same problem arises multiple times in your videos, and you have refused to address this issue.
Will definitely look into this and will revert asap
English please? Can't understand Indian
Please stop giving such wrong solutions...